One of the most important changes in Samsung’s new phones is a simple one: when you long-press the side button on your phone, instead of activating Samsung’s own Bixby assistant by default, you’ll get Google Gemini.
Technology
A Samsung integration helps make Google’s Gemini the AI assistant to beat
This is probably a good thing. Bixby was never a very good virtual assistant — Samsung originally built it primarily as a way to more simply navigate device settings, not to get information from the internet. It has gotten better since and can now do standard assistant things like performing visual searches and setting timers, but it never managed to catch up to the likes of Alexa, Google Assistant, and now, even Siri. So, if you’re a Samsung user, this is good news! Your assistant is probably better now. (And if, for some unknown reason, you really do truly love Bixby, don’t worry: there’s still an app.)
The switch to Gemini is an even bigger deal for Google. Google was caught off guard a couple of years ago when ChatGPT launched but has caught up in a big way. According to recent reporting from The Wall Street Journal, CEO Sundar Pichai now believes Gemini has surpassed ChatGPT, and he wants Google to have 500 million users by the end of this year. It might just get there one Samsung phone at a time.
Gemini is now a front-and-center feature on the world’s most popular Android phones, and millions upon millions of people will likely start to use it more — or use it at all — now that it’s so accessible. For Google, which is essentially betting that Gemini is the future of every single one of its products, that brings a hugely important new set of users and interactions. All that data makes Gemini better, which makes it more useful, which makes it more popular. Which makes it better again.
Right now, Google appears to be well ahead of its competitors in one important way: Gemini is the most capable virtual assistant on the market right now, and it’s not particularly close. It’s not that Gemini is specifically great; it’s just that it has more access to more information and more users than anyone else. This race is still in its early stages, and no AI product is very good yet — but Google knows better than anyone that if you can be everywhere, you can get good really fast. That worked so well with search that it got Google into antitrust trouble. This time, at least so far, it seems like Google’s going to have an even easier time taking over the market.
It’s not that Gemini is specifically great; it’s just that it has more access to more information and more users than anyone else
For years, there were three meaningful players in the virtual assistant space. Amazon’s Alexa, Google’s Assistant, and Apple’s Siri all offered similar features and were similarly accessible through speakers and phones and wearables. But now? The much-hyped, AI-first “Remarkable Alexa” is, by all accounts, massively delayed and massively underpowered. The latest versions of Siri shipped with a wackier animation and seemingly no new smarts or capabilities.
There are other ascendant AI assistants, of course. ChatGPT, Claude, Grok, and Copilot all have strong underlying models, and some share the same multimodal capabilities as Gemini. There are lots of good reasons to pick them or even something like Perplexity over Gemini. But they’re missing the most important thing: distribution. They’re apps you have to download, log in to, and open every time. Gemini is a button you can press — and that’s a big difference. There’s a reason OpenAI is reportedly working on everything from a web browser to a Jony Ive-designed ChatGPT gadget: the built-in options usually win.
The built-in options are also the ones that tend to have the best integration across the platform, which might be the whole ball game. Gemini can already change settings on your phone and, with new upgrades, can even do things across apps — grabbing information from your email and dumping it into a text message draft, just to name one example. Because of the way iOS and Android are architected, no other assistant has this kind of access — and again, there’s no indication that Siri’s ever going to be as good as it needs to be. If the future of assistants is this kind of agentic, using-your-apps-for-you behavior, Google’s inherent advantage might be insurmountable.
Google is practically spoiled for places to put Gemini
Meanwhile, Google is practically spoiled for places to put Gemini. The company recently announced that all paying Workspace customers will get Gemini access. You can access Gemini with one click from your Gmail inbox or summon it with one keystroke in Docs. And the underlying tech is even more pervasive. You can use Gemini to find stuff on YouTube and in Drive, and practically every time you search, a Gemini-powered AI Overview appears at the top of your results. “Today, all seven of our products and platforms with more than two billion monthly users use Gemini models,” Pichai said on Google’s earnings call last fall. (Fun fact: the word “gemini” appears 29 times in that earnings call transcript, only three fewer than “search.”)
When it comes to how people actually encounter and interact with these models, though, the phone is still the AI device of choice. And that’s where Google has maybe its largest advantage. “Gemini’s deep integration is improving Android,” Pichai said on that earnings call. “For example, Gemini Live lets you have free-flowing conversations with Gemini; people love it.” For now, smartphones are the most compelling AI devices, and Google can integrate its systems unlike any other. Apple, scrambling to play catch-up with the iPhone, had to launch an awkward handoff with ChatGPT just so Siri could answer more questions.
All of these assistants, including Gemini, still have lots of limitations. They lie; they misunderstand; they lack the necessary integrations to do even some of the basic things Alexa and Assistant have been able to do for years. The Gemini models still occasionally do ridiculous, deal-breaking things like tell people to eat rocks and generate diverse founding fathers. But if you believe the AI era is coming, or is maybe even here, then there is nothing more important right now than getting your AI platform in front of users. People are developing new habits, learning new systems, developing new relationships with their virtual assistants. The more entrenched we become, the less likely we will be to dump our AI friend for another one.
ChatGPT had the first-mover advantage and captured the world’s imagination by showing just how compelling an AI chatbot could be. But Google has the distribution. It can put its sparkly icon in front of practically the entire population of the internet every single day, across a huge range of products, and get the kind of data and feedback it needs to eventually do this well. Even as it fights in court over how powerful its default status made it in search, Google is executing the same playbook with AI. And it’s working again.
Technology
Psychology Can Be Harnessed to Combat Violent Extremism
This prediction is based on several decades of research that my colleagues and I have been undertaking at the University of Oxford to establish what makes people willing to fight and die for their groups. We use a variety of methods, including interviews, surveys, and psychological experiments to collect data from a wide range of groups, such as tribal warriors, armed insurgents, terrorists, conventional soldiers, religious fundamentalists, and violent football fans.
We have found that life-changing and group-defining experiences cause our personal and collective identities to become fused together. We call it “identity fusion.” Fused individuals will stop at nothing to advance the interests of their groups, and this applies not only to acts we would applaud as heroic—such as rescuing children from burning buildings or taking a bullet for one’s comrades—but also acts of suicide terrorism.
Fusion is commonly measured by showing people a small circle (representing you) and a big circle (representing your group) and placing pairs of such circles in a sequence so that they overlap to varying degrees: not at all, then just a little bit, then a bit more, and so on until the little circle is completely enclosed in the big circle. Then people are asked which pair of circles best captures their relationship with the group. People who choose the one in which the little circle is inside the big circle are said to be “fused.” Those are people who love their group so much that they will do almost anything to protect it.
This isn’t unique to humans. Some species of birds will feign a broken wing to draw a predator away from their fledglings. One species—the superb fairy wren of Australasia—lures predators away from their young by making darting movements and squeaky sounds to imitate the behavior of a delectable mouse. Humans too will typically go to great lengths to protect their genetic relatives, especially their children who (except for identical twins) share more of their genes than other family members. But—unusually in the animal kingdom—humans often go further still by putting themselves in harm’s way to protect groups of genetically unrelated members of the tribe. In ancient prehistory, such tribes were small enough that everyone knew everybody else. These local groups bonded through shared ordeals such as painful initiations, by hunting dangerous animals together, and by fighting bravely on the battlefield.
Nowadays, however, fusion is scaled up to vastly bigger groups, thanks to the ability of the world’s media—including social media—to fill our heads with images of horrendous suffering in faraway regional conflicts.
When I met with one of the former leaders of the terrorist organization Jemaah Islamiyah in Indonesia, he told me he first became radicalized in the 1980s after reading newspaper reports about the treatment of fellow Muslims by Russian soldiers in Afghanistan. Twenty years later, however, nearly a third of American extremists were radicalized via social media feeds, and by 2016 that proportion had risen to about three quarters. Smartphones and immersive reporting shrinks the world to such an extent that forms of shared suffering in face-to-face groups can now be largely recreated and spread to millions of people across thousands of miles at the click of a button.
Fusion based on shared suffering may be powerful, but is not sufficient by itself to motivate violent extremism. Our research suggests that three other ingredients are also necessary to produce the deadly cocktail: outgroup threat, demonization of the enemy, and the belief that peaceful alternatives are lacking. In regions such as Gaza, where the sufferings of civilians are regularly captured on video and shared around the world, it is only natural that rates of fusion among those watching on in horror will increase. If people believe that peaceful solutions are impossible, violent extremism will spiral.
Technology
Samsung Unpacked: Samsung teased an extra-thin S25 model at Unpacked
Samsung Unpacked’s “one more thing” was a bit of a weird one. After the presentation ended, the company rolled a brief pre-packaged video of the Galaxy Edge — not to be confused with the “Star Wars” theme park of the same name.
Though limited, the reveal was confirmation of earlier rumors that the hardware giant is working on an extra-thin version of its new S25 flagship. The Galaxy S25 Edge is, presumably, another tier for the line, slotting in alongside the S25, S25+, and S25 Ultra.
Key details, including pricing, availability, and actual thickness were not revealed, though the company did showcase what appeared to be dummy models at Wednesday’s event. Early rumors pointed to a 6.4 mm thickness, a considerable reduction from the base Galaxy S25’s 7.2 mm.
Samsung clearly wanted to avoid taking too much wind out of the Galaxy S25’s sails during the event, so it opted instead for a more cryptic reveal. Even so, the mere appearance of the device at Unpacked may be enough to keep early adopters from preordering the S25 ahead of its February 7 release.
After all, those are precisely the folks who get excited by things like a 0.8 mm profile reduction.
Technology
This obscure vendor is challenging mighty HP to the title of most powerful mini PC ever with a Ryzen AI Max+ 395 product
- GMKTec joins HP with a Ryzen AI Max+ 395 workstation mini PC
- The Max+ 395 is currently the world’s most powerful APU and could be a nuisance to Nvidia’s DIGITS GB10
- Expect products based on the 395 to roll out later in Q2 2025 after Chinese New Year
GMK, an emerging Chinese brand in the mini PC market, has announced (originally in Chinese) the upcoming launch of a new product powered by the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395.
The company claims this will be the world’s first mini PC featuring the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 chip. It also plans to offer versions with non-Plus Ryzen AI Max APUs.
According to ITHome (originally in Chinese), the device is part of GMK’s “ALL IN AI” strategy and is expected to debut in the first or second quarter of 2025.
AMD’s Ryzen AI Max+ 395 chip
The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 processor boasts 16 Zen 5 cores, 32 threads, and a 5.1 GHz peak clock speed. Additionally, it integrates 40 RDNA 3.5 compute units, delivering solid graphics performance via the Radeon 8060S iGPU.
According to benchmarks, the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 outpaces the Intel Lunar Lake Core Ultra 9 288V in CPU tasks by threefold and surpasses NVIDIA’s GeForce RTX 4090 in AI performance tests.
With a configurable TDP of 45-120W, the processor balances efficiency and performance, positioning itself as a competitive choice for AI workloads, gaming, and mobile workstations.
This platform adopts LPDDR5x memory, achieving a bandwidth of up to 256GB/s. It also integrates a 50TOPS “XDNA 2” NPU, providing impressive AI performance tailored towards Windows 11 AI+ PCs.
The Max+ 395 specs suggest that the new GMK mini PC will likely surpass the performance of the current Evo X1 model, which features a Ryzen Strix Point HX 370 APU and is priced at $919.
You might also like
Technology
Microsoft’s relationship with OpenAI cracked when it hired Mustafa Suleyman, rival Marc Benioff says
Salesforce CEO Marc Benioff was literally chuckling when talking to CNBC from Davos about the new rift in Microsoft’s relationship with OpenAI. As part of OpenAI’s plans to team up with SoftBank and Oracle on a $500 billion data center project called Stargate, Microsoft is no longer the exclusive cloud provider for OpenAI.
“I think it’s extremely important that OpenAI gets to other platforms quickly because Microsoft is building their own AI and I don’t think Microsoft will use OpenAI in the future. They’ll have their own frontier models,” Benioff predicted, laughing. “That’s why they hired Mustafa Suleyman. And Mustafa Suleyman and Sam Altman are not best friends.”
Benioff said their dislike was visible at the year-ago Davos show, “where Sam and Mustafa were on panels together and not getting along.”
The end of Microsoft exclusively hosting OpenAI was destined to happen. Microsoft invested $1 billion in OpenAI in 2019 — years before OpenAI released ChatGPT at the end of 2022. Now, OpenAI appears bound for its own tech giant status, perhaps one day to rival Microsoft. OpenAI has also blamed a lack of available compute for product delays, indicating it needs more data center capacity than Microsoft can (or perhaps wants to) provide. And OpenAI’s exclusive agreement with Microsoft was to end whenever OpenAI achieved what they both agreed was AGI. To hear Sam Altman tell it, AGI is possible now.
Some reports indicate tension between the two companies has been building since at least mid-2023, after OpenAI released its own, competing enterprise product. After Altman was fired and reinstated as OpenAI CEO in late 2023, employees from both companies told Business Insider they really don’t like working together. OpenAI’s folks tended to look down on those at Microsoft, some employees said.
Just a few months later, in early 2024, Nadella thumbed his nose back by hiring DeepMind and Inflection co-founder Mustafa Suleyman to lead Microsoft AI. (Microsoft has not yet responded to our request for comment.)
While Benioff may hope that Microsoft will fully abandon OpenAI in the future, that could be wishful thinking, although Microsoft is reportedly working on its own LLM called MAI-1. Still, when Microsoft announced earlier this month a new AI group led by Jay Parikh that will build AI agents and apps, the post didn’t even mention OpenAI.
This latest fissure in the partnership is good news for Benioff. Salesforce also uses OpenAI’s enterprise models, and is an investor in OpenAI rival Anthropic.
Even so, Benioff’s observations about Suleyman aren’t completely off. Suleyman has been known to dismiss Altman’s vision especially around AGI, and admitted last month in an interview with The Verge that the OpenAI partnership has “little tensions here and there.”
TechCrunch has an AI-focused newsletter! Sign up here to get it in your inbox every Wednesday.
Technology
The importance of understanding your minimum viable operations
Amid the Cold War, the possibility of a nuclear attack was deeply feared, yet at the same time, weirdly unimaginable. The stark terror of nuclear disaster persisted for years, highlighted in the 1984 BBC drama film “Threads”.
The film explored the hypothetical event of a nuclear bomb being dropped on a British city, and the societal breakdown that followed. People were horrified by the film, and it showcased everyone’s deepest and darkest fears around nuclear fallout.
Fast-forward nearly 40 years, and while nuclear fear still abounds, cybersecurity catastrophe is the new background dread – and in July 2024 we received our first major warning sign.
The CrowdStrike outage highlighted the widespread chaos that could ensue if millions of computers crashed simultaneously – reminding many people of the fear instilled during the Y2K bug.
Now imagine this chaos, but instead of a software update gone wrong, it’s a cybercriminal targeting critical systems within a power station, resulting in a city losing power for a week. Or perhaps a vulnerability in a piece of fintech software triggering a 2008-style financial meltdown.
Whilst such an event may be difficult to envisage, the interconnectedness of modern systems makes it a real possibility. Achieving operational resilience must be the goal and this means prioritizing keeping business-critical functions running in the event of a serious incident. But to do so organizations first need to understand their minimum viable operation (MVO).
Director of Critical Infrastructure at Illumio.
What is MVO?
MVO refers to the absolute minimum number of systems a business needs to remain operational or continue delivering services. This includes mapping out detailed rebuild protocols and establishing recovery measures to minimize downtime.
Many organizations have come to realize that simply reducing the probability of a cyberattack to zero is impossible. Regardless of how much money organizations spend on security, it doesn’t make their systems or data less attractive to cybercriminals.
Whilst money can’t reduce the probability, it can reduce the impact of an attack when spent correctly. Instead of focusing solely on breach prevention, organizations are increasingly shifting their investments to prioritize breach containment and impact mitigation, ensuring they can maintain their MVO.
In the power station example mentioned earlier, the organization’s MVO would include the SCADA and ICS systems that control energy creation, monitoring, and distribution. By identifying their MVO, the power station can build a cyber resilience strategy that protects these critical systems and keeps the power on when the inevitable breach occurs.
This approach is not an admission that cybercriminals have beaten us, but an acceptance of the reality that it’s impossible to guarantee immunity from breaches. Instead, it’s about limiting the impact when they do occur. There’s no shame in being breached; however, a lack of preparedness is inexcusable, especially for businesses in critical sectors.
Putting the MVO approach into practice
So where should you start? The first step in understanding your MVO is identifying the systems critical to maintaining operations, and this is unique to each business. For example, the systems considered part of an organization’s MVO will be completely different in retail compared to energy.
Once these have been identified, you need to then identify the risks surrounding or linked to these systems. What are they communicating with and how? Consider risk vectors, the supply chain, and any third parties connecting to your MVO systems.
Like most organizations, it’s likely you rely on a significant number of third parties to operate – just look at the vast number of suppliers and contractors keeping the NHS running, and the impact of the attack on pathology supplier Synnovis. It’s critical that you understand which third-party systems are connected to your networks and limit and control what they have access to. Best practice is to enforce a policy based on least privilege to limit connectivity to the bare minimum required.
This is also where having an “assume breach” mentality is essential. Assume breach shifts the focus from solely trying to prevent unauthorized access to ensuring that, once inside, attackers’ movements are severely restricted and their impact is minimized. This not only helps you to strategically manage and mitigate risks, but also safeguard MVO assets and critical operations.
How Zero Trust supports an MVO approach
One of the best ways to adopt an assume breach mindset and protect MVO assets is by embracing Zero Trust.
Zero Trust is a security strategy based on the principle of “never trust, always verify.” It enforces stringent least-privilege principles at all access points, minimizing the risk of unauthorized access. This approach significantly reduces the impact of attacks and aligns with a MVO approach by identifying critical assets, their usage, and data flows within the network.
Micro-segmentation technologies like Zero Trust Segmentation (ZTS) are foundational to Zero Trust as they divide networks into isolated segments with dedicated controls. With Micro-segmentation in place, you can restrict user access, monitor traffic, and prevent lateral movement in case of unauthorized access, isolating and safeguarding your critical assets.
Not all cyberattacks need to result in suspension of operations
The UK government has warned about the economic disaster that could unfold if a cyberattack on critical infrastructure was successful. However, for the reality is that the impact could be catastrophic for any enterprise or business that fails to safeguard its critical operations.
In Richard Horne’s debut speech as the NCSC CEO, he spoke about the increasing hostility faced by the UK, with attackers wanting to cause maximum disruption and destruction. And while a cyberattack might not immediately seem as scary as the nuclear attack in “Threads,” its disastrous impact on society is as significant as that of a weapon of mass destruction.
Therefore, securing the assets that keep society and businesses running is essential. Not all cyberattacks need to end in business or operational failure. By prioritizing an MVO approach with Zero Trust and micro-segmentation at its core, you can ensure your organization avoids catastrophic fallout from attacks.
We’ve compiled a list of the best identity management software.
This article was produced as part of TechRadarPro’s Expert Insights channel where we feature the best and brightest minds in the technology industry today. The views expressed here are those of the author and are not necessarily those of TechRadarPro or Future plc. If you are interested in contributing find out more here: https://www.techradar.com/news/submit-your-story-to-techradar-pro
Technology
Rent-to-own startup Divvy Homes selling to Brookfield for about $1 billion
After a turbulent few years for companies operating in the real estate market, Divvy Homes announced Wednesday that it is getting acquired by a division of Brookfield Properties for “a total consideration” of about $1 billion.
The outcome may not be the fire sale as previously described in other reports, although it is less than the $2.3 billion that Divvy was last publicly valued at in 2021. The deal is expected to close in mid-February. (Reporter’s note: After this story was published, TechCrunch learned that some Divvy shareholders may not receive proceeds from the acquisition, according to a letter from CEO and co-founder Adena Hefets that was viewed by TechCrunch.)
Divvy operated a rent-to-own model in which it worked with renters who wanted to become homeowners by buying the home they wanted and renting it back to them for three years while they built “the savings needed to own it themselves,” it said.
The company ran into some hiccups when mortgage interest rates began to surge in 2022, conducting three known rounds of layoffs in a year’s time.
Founded in 2016, the once-buzzy startup had raised more than $700 million in debt and equity from well-known investors such as Tiger Global Management, GGV Capital, and Andreessen Horowitz (a16z), among others. Divvy’s last known funding occurred in August 2021 — a $200 million Series D funding led by Tiger Global Management and Caffeinated Capital. The Series D round was announced just six months after a $110 million Series C.
Maymont Homes, the Brookfield unit that is buying Divvy, operates in over 40 markets across the United States. In a written statement, Divvy said it has “created 2,000 homeowners to date.”
Want more fintech news in your inbox? Sign up for TechCrunch Fintech here.
Want to reach out with a tip? Email me at maryann@techcrunch.com or send me a message on Signal at 408.204.3036. You can also send a note to the whole TechCrunch crew at tips@techcrunch.com. For more secure communications, click here to contact us, which includes SecureDrop and links to encrypted messaging apps.
Technology
The brains behind our favorite VPN want to be your gateway to more than 200 AI models
- The team behind Nord Security, Tesonet, Hostinger, Oxylabs launches AI orchestration platform
- The orchestration platform aims to resolve a major pain point, deploying AI LLMs at scale seamlessly
- $8 million raised to help enterprises handle the mounting amount of LLMs, with more than 200 now supported
As artificial intelligence tools rapidly evolve, businesses face growing challenges in managing AI models, balancing costs, and ensuring reliable performance.
Nexos.ai, a new unified AI orchestration platform from the founders of business VPN vendor Nord is designed to help enterprises deploy AI at scale by addressing these challenges; providing access to over 200 AI models to simplify their integration into enterprise
The company has secured $8 million in funding from investors, including Olivier Pomel, CEO of Datadog; Sebastian Siemiatkowski, CEO of Klarna; Ilkka Paananen, CEO of Supercell; and Avishai Abrahami, CEO of Wix.com.
Nexos.ai launch
Tomas Okmanas and Eimantas Sabaliauskas, co-founders of Nord Security and now Nexos.ai, faced challenges in integrating AI across various companies even after spending over $100,000 on large language models (LLMs) in some cases.
Feedback from businesses also revealed a lack in infrastructure capable of supporting scalable, high-quality, and cost-effective AI applications. Nexos.ai also includes models from providers such as OpenAI, Google, and Meta, to assist enterprises in managing their AI operations.
“Companies know that AI is an operational and competitive necessity, but they’re drowning in the challenges of managing multiple models, controlling costs and ensuring accurate and reliable performance,” Okmanas said.
“At the same time, AI models are becoming increasingly autonomous and capable of handling complex tasks with minimal human intervention. We’ve built nexos.ai to be the enterprise-grade platform that makes working with AI as intuitive as working with human teams – providing the infrastructure and oversight to make sure these models perform at their best while remaining cost-effective and secure.”
Scheduled for release in early 2025, the platform is already being tested by international companies to cater for automated customer support.
You might also like
Technology
Therabody Promo Codes and Deals: 10% Off
I don’t know if you’re like me, but one of my favorite ways to treat myself is with products that I know will help me better my body and ease any pain. Therabody has a slew of truly great products to help with everything from sore muscles, to aches and pains, and even has a full-on total body recliner, eyemasks to relieve headaches, and a LED skincare mask to keep you looking your best. Although these products can be expensive, they are a truly invaluable way to keep yourself looking and feeling good (plus, this helps to avoid even more expensive hospital visits down the line). Not sure where to start? We have a Therabody tools guide to help you find which product is right for your needs. And lucky for you, once you’ve found the right product, you can save big with our Therabody promo code.
Get 10% Off Bestsellers With a Therabody Discount Code
Been eyeing a trendy TheraFace Pro or popular Theragun Pro, but getting cold feet about the price? I have good news for you. You can now get 10% off best-sellers with a Therabody discount code when you sign up for email and texts. First, input your information and sign up to receive emails. You’ll receive a discount code for 10% off in your inbox. Enter the discount code at checkout to receive 10% off, and watch the price melt away (just like your aches and pains!). The Therabody promo code expires 30 days following receipt of the discount code, so don’t forget to use it once received.
Shop Therabody’s Gift Guide
Not sure about which Therabody products will be best for those on your Valentine’s Day or birthday gift lists (or let’s be honest, yourself)? Therabody’s got you. They’ve created gift guides for men, women, athletes, snoozers, and even have one for those who have everything. Be sure to peruse Therabody’s gift guide to get great ideas on the often stressful task of holiday shopping.
Other Ways to Save up to 30% at Therabody
There are additional ways to save at Therabody. You can even use your FSA/HSA card or dollars on some qualifying products. Military personnel, healthcare workers, and first responders all get a 20% off Therabody promo code; you’ll just need to verify your status through ID.me.
If you’ve been wanting to try these health-forward trendy devices, but don’t know where to start, shop at the Therabody Outlet, where you can get huge discounts on certified refurbished devices. They also have tons of last chance offers on a select few iconic early gen devices. At the outlet, you can find discounts of up to 30% off, including certified refurbished products like the Theragun, TheraFace, SmartGoggles, RecoveryAir Jetboots, and more top bestsellers.
Technology
WhatsApp wins reprieve in India over user data sharing
An Indian tribunal on Thursday suspended restrictions that would have barred WhatsApp from sharing user data with its parent company Meta, delivering a significant victory for Mark Zuckerberg’s social media empire in its largest market by users.
The ruling by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal temporarily lifts a five-year ban imposed by India’s antitrust regulator, which had accused WhatsApp of abusing its market dominance through its 2021 privacy policy.
India is the largest market for Meta and WhatsApp. More than 700 million users in India use WhatsApp each month, according to insights from Sensor Tower.
In November, the Competition Commission of India determined that WhatsApp’s “take-it-or-leave-it” privacy update constituted an abuse of Meta’s dominant position by forcing users to accept expanded data collection without an opt-out option.
At the time, the watchdog found Meta was dominant in two key markets in India: a so-called “over-the-top” messaging apps through smartphones, and online display advertising.
While staying the ban on Thursday, the tribunal ordered Meta to deposit about $12.35 million — half of a larger penalty — within two weeks. The court will next hear the case on March 17.
The tribunal, led by Justice Ashok Bhushan, expressed concern that the five-year ban could threaten WhatsApp’s business model, which provides the messaging service free to users.
Meta’s lawyers argued that India’s forthcoming digital privacy law, expected to go into effect later this year, should govern such matters rather than competition rules.
“We welcome the NCLAT’s decision to grant a partial stay on the Competition Commission of India’s (CCI) order. While we will evaluate next steps, our focus remains on finding a path forward that supports millions of businesses that depend on our platform for growth and innovation as well as providing high-quality experiences that people expect from WhatsApp,” a Meta spokesperson said in a statement.
The dispute began when WhatsApp required users to accept expanded data sharing with Meta’s platforms or risk losing access to the messaging service. While European users can opt out of such sharing, Indian users cannot — a distinction that regulators found problematic.
Technology
NYT Connections today — my hints and answers for Thursday, January 23 (game #592)
Good morning! Let’s play Connections, the NYT’s clever word game that challenges you to group answers in various categories. It can be tough, so read on if you need clues.
What should you do once you’ve finished? Why, play some more word games of course. I’ve also got daily Strands hints and answers and Quordle hints and answers articles if you need help for those too, while Marc’s Wordle today page covers the original viral word game.
SPOILER WARNING: Information about NYT Connections today is below, so don’t read on if you don’t want to know the answers.
NYT Connections today (game #592) – today’s words
Today’s NYT Connections words are…
- BETTER
- BLANKET
- SATCHEL
- PAGAN
- WIDEN
- COOLER
- WHIP
- SMARTER
- BASKET
- ECLIPSE
- BOMBER
- UTENSILS
- ТОР
- FEDORA
- SURPASS
- VIXEN
NYT Connections today (game #592) – hint #1 – group hints
What are some clues for today’s NYT Connections groups?
- YELLOW: Superior output
- GREEN: Alfresco dining
- BLUE: As seen in the Temple of Doom
- PURPLE: Sounds like White House residents
Need more clues?
We’re firmly in spoiler territory now, but read on if you want to know what the four theme answers are for today’s NYT Connections puzzles…
NYT Connections today (game #592) – hint #2 – group answers
What are the answers for today’s NYT Connections groups?
- YELLOW: OUTDO
- GREEN: PICNIC ACCESSORIES
- BLUE: PARTS OF AN INDIANA JONES COSTUME
- PURPLE: RHYMES OF U.S. PRESIDENT NAMES
Right, the answers are below, so DO NOT SCROLL ANY FURTHER IF YOU DON’T WANT TO SEE THEM.
NYT Connections today (game #592) – the answers
The answers to today’s Connections, game #592, are…
- YELLOW: OUTDO BETTER, ECLIPSE, SURPASS, TOP
- GREEN: PICNIC ACCESSORIES BASKET, BLANKET, COOLER, UTENSILS
- BLUE: PARTS OF AN INDIANA JONES COSTUME BOMBER, FEDORA, SATCHEL, WHIP
- PURPLE: RHYMES OF U.S. PRESIDENT NAMES PAGAN, SMARTER, VIXEN, WIDEN
- My rating: Hard
- My score: 3 mistakes
Oh my gosh I found today’s Connections difficult.
Maybe if the RHYMES OF U.S. PRESIDENT NAMES had included Chump I would have got there, but this wasn’t the only group I was mentally grappling with.
On my third attempt I managed to link BOMBER, FEDORA, SATCHEL, and WHIP, but it wasn’t because I thought they had anything to do with PARTS OF AN INDIANA JONES COSTUME – if I’m honest, I’d forgotten his bag preference.
Cluelessly, I thought they were accessories named after a person, based on the incorrect assumption that Fedora was someone famous in the 1920s. In fact, the history of the Fedora is much more interesting and culminates in a 2016 article that described the fedora hat as the world’s “most-hated fashion accessory”. Yes, this is the same year as a certain red cap rose to prominence.
Yesterday’s NYT Connections answers (Wednesday, 22 January, game #591)
- GREEN: RESULTS OF SOME DIGGING DITCH, HOLE, PIT, TRENCH
- YELLOW: TYPES OF ACADEMIC COURSES DISCUSSION, LAB, LECTURE, SEMINAR
- BLUE: ONES WEARING ROBES BOXER, JUDGE, MONK, WIZARD
- PURPLE: ___ UP BATTER, BOTTOMS, CHIN, LAWYER
What is NYT Connections?
NYT Connections is one of several increasingly popular word games made by the New York Times. It challenges you to find groups of four items that share something in common, and each group has a different difficulty level: green is easy, yellow a little harder, blue often quite tough and purple usually very difficult.
On the plus side, you don’t technically need to solve the final one, as you’ll be able to answer that one by a process of elimination. What’s more, you can make up to four mistakes, which gives you a little bit of breathing room.
It’s a little more involved than something like Wordle, however, and there are plenty of opportunities for the game to trip you up with tricks. For instance, watch out for homophones and other word games that could disguise the answers.
It’s playable for free via the NYT Games site on desktop or mobile.
-
Fashion8 years ago
These ’90s fashion trends are making a comeback in 2025
-
Entertainment8 years ago
The Season 9 ‘ Game of Thrones’ is here.
-
Fashion8 years ago
9 spring/summer 2025 fashion trends to know for next season
-
Entertainment8 years ago
The old and New Edition cast comes together to perform You’re Not My Kind of Girl.
-
Sports8 years ago
Ethical Hacker: “I’ll Show You Why Google Has Just Shut Down Their Quantum Chip”
-
Business8 years ago
Uber and Lyft are finally available in all of New York State
-
Entertainment8 years ago
Disney’s live-action Aladdin finally finds its stars
-
Sports8 years ago
Steph Curry finally got the contract he deserves from the Warriors
-
Entertainment8 years ago
Mod turns ‘Counter-Strike’ into a ‘Tekken’ clone with fighting chickens
-
Fashion8 years ago
Your comprehensive guide to this fall’s biggest trends
You must be logged in to post a comment Login