Connect with us

Politics

What Can You See The Pharmacist About: Explained

Published

on

What Can You See The Pharmacist About: Explained

Most (87% of) doctors say this winter has been busier than usual for minor health concerns, according to research commissioned by Asda Pharmacy, with nearly a third (31%) spending more than an hour every day treating conditions that could be safely managed in pharmacies.

The same survey found 77% of GPs say minor conditions are putting unnecessary pressure on surgeries.

The issue isn’t patients seeking help unnecessarily, the pharmacy suggested, but instead that they just don’t know where to go for their ailments other than their GP.

It makes sense: NHS England’s Pharmacy First initiative only started in January 2024, and if people have had no reason to go to the doctors in this time, they may not be aware that there are other options available to them for minor ailments and prescription-only medications.

Advertisement

What is Pharmacy First?

Pharmacy First enables people to get certain prescription medications directly from a pharmacy, without the need for a GP appointment.

This initiative frees up GP appointments for those who needs them most, as well as improving access to safe and quality healthcare.

NHS England explained: “Community pharmacies offer a more convenient way to access healthcare that includes support with healthy eating, exercise, stopping smoking, monitoring your blood pressure, contraception, flu and covid vaccinations.”

Advertisement

If you’re feeling nervous about seeing a pharmacist or even just a little unsure, rest assured that it is often a very reliable, helpful service and in fact, the public perceptions of community pharmacy survey found that over 90% of patients who sought guidance from a community pharmacy within the past year reported receiving good advice.

What are the conditions you can see a pharmacist for?

Asda Pharmacy have launched ISSUE IS, an awareness campaign designed to help families quickly recognise when Pharmacy First is the right choice.

‘ISSUE IS’ is a simple, memorable acronym covering common conditions pharmacists can treat:

Advertisement

I – Infected insect bites

To help drive change, Asda has partnered with TV doctor Dr Hilary Jones to encourage the public to rethink where they go first when everyday illness strikes.

Dr Hilary Jones said: “Too many people still don’t realise how much their local pharmacy can do. Pharmacists are trained healthcare professionals who can assess symptoms and provide NHS treatment for common conditions.

“Pharmacy First helps patients get seen faster and reduces pressure on GP surgeries – and Asda’s ISSUE IS campaign makes it easier than ever to know where to go first.”

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

Shapiro tests Democrats’ data center strategy

Published

on

Construction of the future Amazon data center site in Fairless Hills, Pennsylvania, on Dec. 17, 2025.

PHILADELPHIA — Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro, a bellwether Democrat on AI and data centers, is tempering his message ahead of his reelection campaign.

Shapiro, a swing-state Democrat and a 2028 presidential prospect, has staked his state’s economic fortunes on the tech industry. He wooed a $20 billion investment from Amazon along with major investments by Microsoft and Google. Shapiro has backed President Donald Trump’s call for more nuclear and natural gas plants to power new tech hubs.

He’s now trying to hedge his bet as data centers absorb a nationwide backlash from voters increasingly concerned about their impact on electricity bills.

“Pay for your own power, so it’s not saddling local businesses or homeowners with higher costs,” Shapiro said in an interview with POLITICO earlier this month from a union hall in Philadelphia.

Advertisement

It’s an unmistakable pivot by a leading practitioner of data center politics who along with other Democratic governors has been trying to bring under control rising electricity prices that could be political kryptonite for both parties. Household electricity bills are rising at twice the rate of inflation. In recent weeks, Shapiro has joined Arizona Gov. Katie Hobbs, New York Gov. Kathy Hochul and other Democrats who are sharpening their tone and putting new policies in place to try to claw back taxpayer expenses, increase pressure on utility companies and address local backlash against development.

“Too many of these projects have been shrouded in secrecy, with local communities left in the dark about who is coming in and what they’re building,” Shapiro said in his annual address to the Pennsylvania General Assembly earlier this month.

Shapiro, who is riding high in the polls as he launches his reelection campaign, is pitching the AI and data center boom as a source of union jobs during the yearslong construction phase — but also trying to manage the boom’s potential to alienate other voters.

Christopher Borick, a political science professor at Muhlenberg College in Allentown, said Shapiro’s “get stuff done” political brand runs into trouble if voters tie energy affordability concerns to data center projects.

Advertisement

“People have started to connect the demand for AI and data centers to pricing,” he said.

Construction of the future Amazon data center site in Fairless Hills, Pennsylvania, on Dec. 17, 2025.

Jobs and energy

Few Democrats have anticipated the data center zeitgeist as deftly as Shapiro. Shortly after taking office in 2023, he ordered an analysis of where the state and U.S. economies were headed. AI jumped out as a key opportunity, a top adviser said.

“Not just because we thought it was cool, but because we have strengths,” said Rick Siger, a former Obama staffer who serves as Shapiro’s secretary of community and economic development.

Carnegie Mellon University, a top engineering and technology school, was a selling point. So was the state’s manufacturing base, which makes hardware for data centers and boasts tech companies that will deploy advanced AI. Shapiro’s team fixated on what major developers were after. “Speed matters, in particular to companies that are competing in AI,” Siger said.

Advertisement

In June 2025, Shapiro announced Amazon’s $20 billion investment in two data center complexes: one in the Philadelphia suburbs of Bucks County and another south of Wilkes-Barre.

“The employees will be making, in some cases, double the average wage in that county,” Siger said, “to work in a high-tech job and be able to stay home and raise their kids in their hometown.” The data center piece of the AI juggernaut also works well for Shapiro’s union-heavy constituency. He toured Steamfitters Local Union 420’s training center in Philadelphia earlier this month, which is training apprentices to install cooling systems for the computer chips packed in wall-to-wall racks inside the cluster of AI factories being developed in Bucks County.

Rory Carroll, a 42-year-old steamfitter who was among the trainees greeting Shapiro, said he’s “tried everything” to make a living. “I sold cars, delivered pizza, managed a supermarket.” Now, he says he’s on a rising tide.

Local officials in Bucks County — which Trump flipped red in 2024, for the first time since 1988 — are wary but welcoming.

Advertisement

“Do I think the trend of technology replacing jobs will continue with the data centers? Of course I do,” said Erin Mullen, vice chair of the Falls Township Board of Supervisors. But she said the temporary construction jobs were worth pursuing. “This is a blue-collar township,” Mullen said. “So even though the jobs are temporary, a lot of families here survive on temporary jobs, and this is huge for the trades.”

Data centers’ demand for energy also works for Shapiro, who’s been touting the state’s large natural gas reserves in talks with tech companies. Last summer, he joined Trump and the state’s Republican senator, Dave McCormick, in Pittsburgh to announce multibillion-dollar commitments for restarting aging hydropower and expanding electricity generation from nuclear and natural gas.

Now, after cuts to federal renewable energy tax credits, he’s still touting Pennsylvania energy — with a partisan edge.

“I’m an ‘all-of-the-above’ energy governor,” Shapiro said in the POLITICO interview. “Unfortunately, the president of the United States has cut hundreds of millions of dollars from clean energy development in this commonwealth, which has cost us 26,000 union trade jobs who were set to work on these projects.”

Advertisement

“I don’t think it’s an either-or — it’s a both-and,” he continued. “We need to generate more power. Yes, it will rely in part on Pennsylvania natural gas. We also need to generate more power with renewables.”

Power politics

Shapiro’s call for data center developers to pay for electricity infrastructure that could drive up utility bills echoes the Trump administration’s recent rhetoric exhorting them to “pick up the tab” — but Shapiro’s focus on power bills was a long time coming.

In July 2024, as Shapiro was chasing Amazon, mid-Atlantic ratepayers were hit with a $14.7 billion, one-year charge from PJM Interconnection, the region’s electricity grid manager. The double-digit cost increases in utility bills came as a result of projections that electricity supplies could fall short of demand across the 13-state region stretching from northern Virginia to Chicago.

Shapiro demanded a price cap in December 2024 on the fastest-rising part of PJM customers’ electricity bills — a headline-grabbing event in Pennsylvania. And he’s threatened to pull Pennsylvania out of the PJM market all together, a major uprooting of the way power is delivered in the region. He’s attacked PJM for its byzantine utility-heavy leadership structure that leads to a sclerotic response to rising power prices.

Advertisement

Top: Construction of the future Amazon data center site, in Fairless Hills. Bottom: An industrial facility near the same site, in Morrisville.

According to federal data, electricity prices in Pennsylvania rose roughly 20 percent between November 2024 and November 2025 — the highest rate in the country. And PJM has warned that states could face power shortages by the end of the decade if the construction of new data centers race ahead of the energy supply.

“PJM is broken,” Shapiro said in December. “They’re too damned slow. And the needs we have in this country to produce more energy to support everything from data centers to more manufacturing need to be met. And we are being held captive.”

The enormously complex market rules that affect power prices in Shapiro’s state are outside average Americans’ conversations. But Shapiro and Trump have tied a rising part of their political parties’ credibility to the outcome of their pledges to make data centers pay their own way.

In January, Shapiro went to the White House alongside other East Coast governors of both parties to call for PJM to control power prices — and for data centers to “bring their own power” through long-term contracts with new generation developers.

Advertisement

Big tech companies are starting to sign on. Trump used a Truth Social post in early January to announce the White House was working with tech companies to get more agreement on containing the public cost of energy infrastructure. Microsoft then pledged to shoulder more of those costs.

Shapiro’s tack could work for him, according to recent polling.

A POLITICO poll released last week showed an electorate still wrestling with the data center question. Respondents’ top concerns surrounding data centers were power prices and the risk of blackouts — yet they were generally willing to support a new data center in their area evenif it hikes their power bills.

In his address to lawmakers, Shapiro proposed a three-pronged strike against rising energy costs — proposing new rules for data center developers, electric utilities and the regional grid PJM. He pledged to “hold data center developers accountable to strict standards if they want our full support.”

Advertisement

Last week, PJM agreed to extend price controls on future electricity production into 2030.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Andrew reported to police by Gordon Brown

Published

on

Andrew reported to police by Gordon Brown

Former PM Gordon Brown has said that he dobbed former prince Andrew into “several UK police forces”.

Brown wrote a five-page letter to various forces, including the Met, Sussex and Thames Valley, which he says contained “new and additional” information from the Epstein files. The ex-royal was arrested this morning on suspicion of ‘misconduct in public office’ — which carries a potential life sentence but does nothing for Andrew’s and Epstein’s victims.

Brown doesn’t seem to have been asked quite why he had information from the Epstein files not previously available to police. Keir Starmer has helpfully added ‘What the king said’, insisting like Chuck that the “law must take its course”.

The whole establishment now seems to be getting in on the Andrew act as some kind of ritual hand-washing of its own metastatic part in Epstein’s decades of child-rape, trafficking and spying for Israel. Which isn’t how they’re describing it, of course — especially the Israel bit.

Advertisement

For more on the Epstein Files, please read the Canary’s article on the way that the media circus around Epstein is erasing the experiences of victims and survivors.

Featured image via the ScottishGreens

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Greens Say They’re 73 Votes Behind Reform In By-Election Run-Up

Published

on

Greens Say They're 73 Votes Behind Reform In By-Election Run-Up

The Green Party believes it is only 73 votes behind Reform in run-up to the Gorton and Denton by-election, HuffPost UK understands.

The party came to that conclusion after more than 13,000 doorstep conversations, according to an internal Green Party WhatsApp group seen by HuffPost UK.

Campaigners in the constituency believe the Greens are now just 0.2% behind Reform, equating to just 73 votes.

The activists described the vote as being on a “literal knife edge”.

Advertisement

Voters in the Greater Manchester seat will head to the ballot box next Thursday for the crunch contest.

The seat has traditionally been Labour so it will be a significant test of Keir Starmer’s authority and approval among the electorate.

The Greens and Reform UK have both soared in popularity over the last 18 months and are hoping to boost their seat numbers in the Commons.

The outsider parties have also insisted they are now locked in a race with each other, while Labour has told HuffPost UK that it is only between their party and Reform.

Advertisement

Meanwhile, the UK Polling Report’s website is currently predicting Labour will hold the seat.

It claimed Labour candidate Angeliki Stogia will win with 35.47% of the vote, while Reform’s Matt Goodwin will come in second place with 29.17%.

The Greens’ Hannah Spencer is expected to come in third with 20.83%, according to the data.

Reform UK and Labour have been contacted for comment.

Advertisement

Green activists also used their WhatsApp group to warn they are “seriously short of campaigners for the final stretch of the campaign”.

The party believes that they need 300 people every weekday to campaign across the remaining week, with more 1,000 activists on the trail this weekend and 2,000 people on polling day.

In a message to campaigners, warns that the party is “not even close” to reaching that number right now.

When approached for comment on a potential shortage of campaigners, a party source told HuffPost UK: “That’s campaigns, campaigning. We have hundreds of volunteers out every day and we are expecting Saturday to be the largest action day the party has ever had.

Advertisement

“Our data shows we’re neck and neck with Reform and every extra volunteer out on the streets from now till next Thursday could make the difference to stop Reform.”

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

How Do Olympians Cope With Performance Anxiety

Published

on

How Do Olympians Cope With Performance Anxiety

I don’t know about you but suddenly all of my friends are experts on skiing, figure skating and snowboarding – and it’s all thanks to the 2026 Winter Olympics completely captivating them all.

I mean, who can blame them?

The drama, the skill, the absolutely terrifying risks they take as athletes — these sports are not for the faint-hearted and for us, the audience, they make for an incredible viewing experience, even for those who don’t usually care about sports.

All of this got me thinking, though, how do they cope with performance anxiety?! I struggle to keep it together for a Zoom presentation to 12 people. Can you imagine knowing the world has its eyes on you and the country you represent is depending on you to win?

Advertisement

What Olympians can teach us about performance anxiety

Writing about the mental health impacts of being an Olympian back in 2021, Dr David M. Lyreskog, of the Department of Psychiatry at the University of Oxford, said: “In elite sports teams, the prevalence of depression and anxiety is sometimes as high as 45%, and in adolescent elite sports the prevalence of eating disorders is approximately 14%. The pursuit of performance – of excellence – does not appear to be a healthy one.”

Among the wider population, mixed anxiety and depression is Britain’s most common mental disorder, with 7.8% of people meeting the criteria for diagnosis, according to the Mental Health Foundation.

So, how do almost half of Olympians cope with anxiety when they’re supposed to be at the top of their game? And what can we learn from them?

Advertisement

Writing for the official Olympics website, four-time swimming Olympian-turned-sports psychologist Markus Rogan shared how he had been an anxious athlete and had learned four key lessons to get him through bouts of anxiety.

1. ‘Growing through anxiety’ and connecting with loved ones you trust

“It’s easy to surround yourself with people when you’re amazing, but maybe you can explore relationships with those who are there with you when you’re down,” he said.

2. Facing tough questions

Advertisement

When your brain is racing with ‘what if’ questions, ask yourself why you’re worried about this. Is the worry founded or are you just having anxious thoughts?

3. Asking people for their opinions

Sometimes, our anxiety simply comes from the unknown. Ask your loved ones to help. Ask them what you’re afraid to hear and trust them to protect you as they do so.

4. Not ignoring your thoughts

Advertisement

Sometimes bad thoughts are just bad thoughts, but once you label them, you can work on them. “Don’t forget that even the most profound thought is still just a thought,” he assured.

Speaking to Psychology Today, Dr Cindra Kamphoff, who has worked with professional and Olympic athletes for two decades, shared how she supports them following Olympic performances.

She said: “After the Olympics, we debrief. We evaluate what worked, what didn’t, and how to grow from the experience. Then we reset goals and begin preparing for the next competition.

“Confidence and mental performance are ongoing processes, not event-specific interventions.”

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Andrew’s arrest was met with relief from Virginia Giuffre’s family

Published

on

Andrew's arrest was met with relief from Virginia Giuffre's family

Disgraced Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, the former prince, has finally been arrested in connection with revelations from the Epstein files.

Among those who have responded are the family of Virginia Giuffre. Giuffre accused Windsor of sexual abuse:

Nevertheless, it hasn’t escaped attention that the arrest is regarding misconduct in public office and apparently not in connection with Giuffre’s allegations.

Andrew arrest: ‘at last’

On 19 February 2026, Thames Valley Police arrested Andrew on suspicion of misconduct in public office. This came after they reviewed documents from the Epstein files which suggest he shared information from his time as a UK trade envoy with the late convicted paedophile.

Advertisement

Mountbatten-Windsor is currently in police custody amid searches of multiple properties as part of the criminal inquiry. The Epstein files have raised serious concerns about the scale of this sinister web of elitist men. This has prompted widespread demands for full transparency and accountability for sexual abuse against women and girls.

However, this pattern underscores how far more precedence is given to economic interests and institutional power over justice for victims and accountability for abusive men.

The statement from Giuffre’s family reads in full:

At last.

Today, our broken hearts have been lifted at the news that no one is above the law, not even royalty.

Advertisement

On behalf of our sister, Virginia Roberts Giuffre, we extend our gratitude to the UK’s Thames Valley Police for their investigation and arrest of Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor.

He was never a prince.

For survivors everywhere, Virginia did this for you.

Virginia Giuffre

Virginia Giuffre accused Andrew of sexually abusing her when she was just 17 years old. She became a prominent advocate fighting against sex trafficking, in light of her own experience being sexually exploited by Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. She died by suicide in April 2025 leaving her loved ones and survivors across the world devastated and heartbroken. Giuffre’s push for accountability has been continued by advocacy groups across the West. Many have joined the call in demanding powerful men face consequences for the abuse they have evidently inflicted.

Advertisement

We wrote about Andrew’s arrest shortly after it happened:

If former royal, and mate of serial child-rapist Jeffrey Epstein, Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor was hoping for any public sympathy after his arrest this morning – on his birthday – he’s going to be sorely disappointed.

The family of Virginia Giuffre, Andrew’s most well-known victim, welcomed the arrest as a sign that no one is above the law:

“At last, today, our broken hearts have been lifted at the news that no one is above the law, not even royalty,” Giuffre’s family said in the statement given to CBS News.”

However, Windsor was arrested on suspicion of ‘misconduct in a public office’. Knowing the British state, this was more likely linked to his leaking of secrets to Epstein than his abuse of trafficked and potentially under-age girls. But the offence carries a potential life sentence, so there’s that.

Advertisement

Giuffre had long pursued seeing the suspected paedo-prince face accountability for his abuse against her. Obviously, Andrew has always denied these claims, which is no surprise as it’s damn rare to find a man actually hold his hands up in disgust at the abuse he has inflicted.

Because of this, she was denied the justice she deserved over the allegations against Windsor, after Epstein and Maxwell allegedly trafficked her to him. Giuffre also shared in her memoir even more sinister allegations against former Israeli PM Ehud Barak.

We wrote in October:

Virginia Giuffre, one of the most prominent survivors (but now a victim) of serial child rapist and trafficker – and almost certain Israel intelligence asset – Jeffrey Epstein, was repeatedly left battered and bloodied after being beaten and raped by a man she describes, in a new memoir published after her death earlier this year, as a “well-known prime minister”.

Adding:

Advertisement

Giuffre said that she called the man ‘the Prime Minister’ and did not name him, because she was afraid he would come after her and cause her harm if she did. Before Epstein’s death, however, she named former Israeli PM Ehud Barak – also a close friend of Epstein’s ardent fan Peter Mandelson – as one of the many men to rape her, an accusation he has denied.

Virginia Giuffre wrote in horrific detail about the violence inflicted on her by the ‘PM’, whom she met when she was just eighteen:

“He repeatedly choked me until I lost consciousness and took pleasure in seeing me in fear for my life. Horrifically, the Prime Minister laughed when he hurt me and got more aroused when I begged him to stop. I emerged from the cabana bleeding from my mouth, vagina, and anus. For days, it hurt to breathe and to swallow… [He] raped me more savagely than anyone had before.”

King’s ‘concern’

The King chose his words carefully – and choice matters here, because men can choose to amplify victims’ voices and examine allegations critically. Rather than doing so, he voiced his “deepest concern” about his brother’s arrest and stated that “the law must take its course,” adding:

What now follows is the full, fair and proper process by which this issue is investigated in the appropriate manner and by the appropriate authorities.

This statement is reported to have the full support of Will and Kate, the Prince and Princess of Wales. Queenie Camilla had nothing to offer but a wave when asked for her feelings on the arrest. We can’t help but feel the Royal family’s concern here lies solely with Andrew, the man-child sex-pest, rather than the countless victims across the world who fell victim to powerful, privileged men and their sick fancies.

Advertisement

How the mighty have fallen, thus proving that powerful men can be brought to task if the political will is there:

Accountability NOW

Don’t get us wrong, it is bloody wonderful to see the disgraced prince brought to task and finally facing a criminal investigation. A potential life sentence is equally refreshing to see. Nonetheless, many wish to see this go further. Despite the long relationship with Epstein, there has never been a thorough investigation into his involvement in the apparent trafficking ring instrumentalized by Epstein and co.

Enough must be enough. Andrew is now in a police station with more than enough evidence to legitimise a full investigation into allegations of sexual abuse. Yet powerful men have shown us that the protection of young girls will never be as important as protecting power.

Advertisement

Shame on them. Down with the monarchy.

For more on the Epstein Files, please read:

Featured image via the Canary

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Huntsman convicted for illegal hare-hunting

Published

on

Huntsman Saunders with his pack of beagles and hunting horn, looking upset.

Hunt Saboteurs Association (HSA) is celebrating the legal victory, with another huntsman brought to justice. Northampton magistrate’s court has found Philip Saunders guilty of illegal hunting on Wednesday 18 February. Saunders is one of the arsehole huntsman for criminal gang, the Pipewell Foot Beagles.

Huntsman Saunders with his pack of beagles and hunting horn, looking upset.
Leg it lads, we’ve been seen

Another one?

The conviction is the second time these bloodthirsty arseholes have been caught out illegally hare-hunting.

And it beautifully landed just before the 21st anniversary of the Hunting Act.

The court heard how Saunders led his pack to kill a hare at the Boughton Estates on Kettering. Richard Scott is the current Duke of Buccleuch and one of the largest land owners in Scotland. It’s no shock that he would allow an illegal hunt to take place on ‘home turf.’

Courageous wildlife photographer Emma Reed was on the scene and captured the entire incident.

Advertisement
A lone hunter looking annoyed on a mobile phone
Rumbled again

Reed’s video clearly shows Saunders encouraging the hounds to kill. The huntsman was heard growling “Get onto it!” at the dogs. This is a specific hunting term which incites animal cruelty and it proves the hunt intended to pursue the hare.

A dead hare which has fallen victim to the hunt laid on a table
A previous victim of the hunt

As per usual, the HSA provided names to the police at the time, but they failed to act on the evidence. Again.

Losing the horn

The magistrate fined Saunders £1,000 for his role in the illegal hunt. He also has to pay £3,600 in costs and a £400 victim surcharge.

In the landmark move, the court also ordered the destruction of Saunders’ hunting horn. Saunders must surrender it to the police by 5pm Thursday 19 Feb.

Destroying the horn is beautifully symbolic as this is the primary tool a huntsman uses to control the hounds. The HSA believe this should be common practice in all cases as it effectively strips the bloodthirsty wankers of the ability to lead.

Reed expressed her satisfaction with the guilty verdict stating:

Advertisement

“I am pleased with the guilty verdict as justice has been served. The judge was strong in his summing up of sending a message to the hunting community that these illegal actions will not be tolerated and are totally unacceptable.”

Justice for wildlife

The Judge was strong in his summing up of the case, making it clear that illegal hunting of hares is totally unacceptable and it sends a clear warning to the hunting community.

Simon Russell, chair of the HSA spoke to the Canary about this landmark victory:

Hare Hunts always pack up and go home when sabs find them, this is what they are really doing when they’re not under observation, killing our public wild Hares. A good hunting horn is hard to come by, the really decent ones rack in at £300 plus and we would suggest that future convictions have the horns donated to the Hunt Saboteurs Association. We would put them to good use saving wildlife.

Images via Emma Reed

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Heat rises for Iran as Trump ramps up military pressure

Published

on

Heat rises for Iran as Trump ramps up military pressure

An American attack on Iran appears imminent. US president Donald Trump has deployed massive military force to the Persian Gulf while negotiations between the two counties seem to have stalled. Media reports the attack could start as soon as Saturday 21 February.

Iran’s leadership has said that the principles of the negotiations — centring on Iran’s nuclear plans (or lack thereof) — were understood but that no agreement had been reached. The US has said military options are very much ‘on the table’ while Iran now says it’s open to international nuclear inspections.

Iran closed large areas of its airspace on 19 February. It’s aviation authority said it was:

to allow a planned missile launch exercise tomorrow. It specified danger zones where flying will be completely banned due to military activity.

Anonymous Iranian security officials said it was a show of force, and the US aviation authority has followed suit:

Advertisement

warning that uncoordinated missile launches could pose catastrophic risks, including endangering civilian flight paths.

The closure was enough to active alarm bells for some countries. Poland urged its citizens to leave Iran. Prime minister Donald Tusk said:

In a few, a dozen, or several dozen hours, evacuation may no longer be possible.

Behind the scenes, US military aircraft have been moving into the region for days.

Tankers inbound

Sky News reported that American refuelling planes have passed through the UK as part of the build-up. Starmer’s Britain, it appears, is happy to serve as checkpoints for Trump’s march to war.

Military expert professor Michael Clarke was on Sky on 18 February. Using open source air traffic mapping, he showed how on 16 February six US tankers passed through the UK on their way to Greece. On 18 February, a further ten tankers passed through the UK on their way towards the Mediterranean:

Advertisement

You can hear his analysis from around 1.55 in this report:

And Drop Site News journalists Jeremy Scahill and Murtaza Huzzain reported:

the largest buildup of firepower in the Middle East since President Donald Trump authorized a 12-day bombing campaign against Iran last June that killed more than 1,000 people.

One anonymous former Trump insider told the investigative outlet that:

Advertisement

based on his discussions with current officials, he assesses an 80-90% likelihood of U.S. strikes within weeks.

And retired Lt. Col. Daniel Davis said the level of build-up:

harkens back to what I saw ahead of the 2003 Iraq war.

Davis warned:

You don’t assemble this kind of power to send a message. In my view, this is what you do when you’re preparing to use it. What I see on the diplomatic front is just to try to keep things rolling until it’s time to actually launch the military operation. I think that everybody on both sides knows where this is heading.

And a key US command and control aircraft is now in the region…

Critical command and control aircraft

Former US Marine and State Department whistleblower Matthew Hoh said the presence of the E-3 command and control aircraft was an indicator Trump intended to pull the trigger:

Advertisement

The E3 is an incredibly important aircraft. For those unfamiliar, it is the large airplane that looks like an airliner, but with a revolving radar disc on top.

The airplane is loaded with an air crew whose job is to observe, manage and control the airspace in its area. It is especially important for directing fighters and ground/sea based missile interceptors against Iranian missiles and drones.

Renowned international relations scholar John Mearsheimer reminded us that barring UAE – which has close ties with the settler-colonial pariah state – the only country absolutely determined to have a war with Iran was Israel:

Advertisement

 

Drop Site broke down the scale of the build-up:

Two carrier strike groups—each built around one aircraft carrier, several guided‑missile destroyers armed with Tomahawk missiles, and at least one submarine—are also being stationed nearby, along with several additional U.S. destroyers and submarines in regional waters near Iran to defend against ballistic missile attacks, as well as more than 30,000 U.S. military personnel and numerous Patriot and THAAD anti-missile batteries spread across regional military bases.

The USS Gerald R. Ford is on its way to the Gulf from the Caribbean. The ship took part in Trump’s last ‘spectacular’ – the Caracas raid which snatched Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro on 3 January. The Ford is the biggest and most advanced carrier in the world.

Advertisement

Former Pentagon official Jasmine El-Gamal told Drop Site.

This is not a dress rehearsal. This is it. This is not the negotiations of last year or the year before or the year before that. They’re backed into a corner. There’s no off ramp.

El-Gamal said:

The fact that that carrier is there tells me that this isn’t just a routine kind of, ‘Hey, let’s flex some muscle.’ He didn’t need that. He didn’t need to send that second carrier to flex muscle.

But what would a US-Iran war actually look like?

Short intense war?

With negotiations deadlocked, one expert said that Iran and US might favour a short intense war followed by a return to talks.

Advertisement

Swedish-Iranian scholar Trita Parsi told Democracy Now:

We have a very dangerous situation, because both sides actually believe that a short, intense war may improve their negotiating position.

The US believes its overwhelming military capability will:

be able to take out Iran militarily rather quickly and then force it to capitulate.

Parsi said the Iranians have other plans:

They believe that they have the ability to inflict significant damage on the United States in the short term, including on civilian oil installations in the region, closing down the Strait of Hormuz, that would shoot up oil prices…

The Iranians were calculating that:

Advertisement

the initial cost of this to the United States would be so immense, and the United States would recognize that it would have to go for a longer war, which it cannot afford, and as a result, it would get the United States to back off.

Yes another Middle east war is looming. It would be a war which is not at all separate to the current genocide in Gaza and the legacies of the Iraq war. In fact, it would compound both. The best case scenario is that it doesn’t happen at all. Next best? The sort of ‘limited’ bombing we’ve seen in the past.

The third, most terrifying and not at all unlikely outcome is that the war escalates into something altogether more existential with profound impacts for the region and the world, and which sends violent shocks through the global economy. A number of experts and insiders are saying we’ll find out sooner rather than later.

Featured image via the Canary

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Mandelson’s Lobbying Firm Goes Into Administration

Published

on

Mandelson’s Lobbying Firm Goes Into Administration

City AM reports that Global Counsel, the embattled lobbying firm founded by Peter Mandelson, will go into administration as soon as tomorrow. Its CEO Ben Wegg-Prosser – close friend of Mandelson – stood down two weeks ago. Global Cancelled…

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

PETA again calls out uni over ‘cruel and pointless’ mice experiments

Published

on

PETA again calls out uni over 'cruel and pointless' mice experiments

Attendees at the Queen Mary University of London (QMUL) Postgraduate Open Day Event had a more memorable experience than expected on 18 February. A group of PETA supporters stormed the famous Octagon inside the Queens’ Building bearing signs that read, “QMUL: End Cruel Sepsis Experiments,” and chanting, “Sepsis experiments should be cruelty free.”

Cruel experiments

The action is part of PETA’s ongoing campaign calling on the university to stop tormenting mice in cruel and useless sepsis experiments, which consistently fail to lead to effective treatments for humans. Activists previously crashed a meeting of the QMUL Senate to draw the attention of university leadership.

PETA senior campaigns manager Kate Werner said:

Prospective QMUL students should know that the university is using their tuition fees to torture and kill terrified mice in cruel and pointless experiments that have done nothing to advance human health.

PETA urges QMUL to stop wasting animals’ lives on these cruel experiments and switch to cutting-edge, animal-free research that actually helps humans.

Advertisement

More than 150 drugs have successfully treated sepsis in mice, yet none have been effective in treating humans. Despite the well-documented failure in using mice to model human sepsis, QMUL experiments are cutting open terrified mice and puncturing their intestines to leak faecal matter into their bodies.

Experimenters noted that some mice experienced severe sepsis, which can include major organ failure and abject suffering. Data from some of these experiments has been published in papers that were later retracted by the publisher because data and conclusions were deemed ‘unreliable’.

Mice are intelligent, complex, and social individuals who experience a wide range of emotions. They become attached to each other, love their families, and easily bond with their human guardians – returning as much affection as they receive.

PETA encourages everyone to urge Queen Mary to heed the scientific evidence and join other institutions, including the University of Kent, that have committed to non-animal methods in sepsis research.

Advertisement

PETA – whose motto reads, in part, that “animals are not ours to experiment on” – points out that Every Animal Is Someone and offers free Empathy Kits. For more information, visit PETA.org.uk or follow PETA on X, Facebook, or Instagram.

Featured image via PETA

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Four Years In, Trump Remains On Putin’s Side In His Stagnated Invasion Of Ukraine

Published

on

Four Years In, Trump Remains On Putin’s Side In His Stagnated Invasion Of Ukraine

WASHINGTON – Four years after launching an invasion to seize neighboring Ukraine in a matter of days, Russian dictator Vladimir Putin can no longer replenish the tens of thousands of soldiers he is losing per month, has watched his ground offensive grind to a halt and has escalated a war-crime campaign to instead kill civilians. None of it has convinced President Donald Trump to drop his tacit approval of the invasion.

Rather than resume defensive weapons shipments to Ukraine that had existed under predecessor Joe Biden or further pressure Putin economically to end the biggest and deadliest conflict in Europe since World War II, Trump is instead still leaning on Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to give up the territory that Putin wants.

“Ukraine better come to the table fast, is all I’m telling you,” Trump told reporters Monday night on the flight back from his South Florida country club, Mar-a-Lago. It was a repeat of the warning he gave Zelenskyy on Friday as he left for his three-day golf weekend: “Well, Zelenskyy is going to have to get moving. Russia wants to make a deal, and Zelenskyy is going to have to get moving, otherwise he’s going to miss a great opportunity. He has to move.”

In reality, Zelenskyy has repeatedly accepted US calls for a ceasefire while negotiators work out a final peace agreement, while Putin has rejected that concept as he continues to kill and maim Ukrainian civilians with missiles and drones.

Advertisement

Those attacks and deaths have surged dramatically in the year since Trump took office last January. In Biden’s final year in the White House, there were 13,897 missiles and drones launched at Ukraine by Russia, or 38 on an average day, according to figures compiled by the Institute for the Study of War. In Trump’s first year back in office, there were 57,333 missiles and drones, or 157 per day – a 300% increase. The escalation coincided with the cutoff of new US military aid to Ukraine under Trump.

To experts and analysts, Trump’s choice to pressure Zelenskyy rather than Putin is simple: He sees Ukraine as weaker and therefore easier to coerce.

“Trump wants any kind of deal he can get that results in a ceasefire, hoping this will be evidence for his Nobel Peace Prize campaign,” said John Bolton, one of Trump’s national security advisers during his first term and now a target of Trump’s Justice Department. “He doesn’t care about the substance of an agreement, just getting one.”

Jim Townsend, who has worked at both the Pentagon and Nato and is now an analyst with the Center for a New American Security, said Putin knows Trump will never truly pressure him.

Advertisement

“Putin will keep stalling until he gets his way, either by Trump forcing Zelenskyy to the table or by some battlefield victory, which doesn’t look likely either,” Townsend said. “So he will always demand his maximalist position, knowing Zelenskyy will never agree and that irritates Trump, who squeezes Zelenskyy even more.”

To Russia With Love

Trump White House aides did not respond to HuffPost queries. At a news briefing on Tuesday, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt, asked about Zelenskyy’s comment that it was unfair to demand concessions of Ukraine but not Russia, repeated Trump’s frequent lie that the US was bankrolling Ukraine’s defense under Biden.

“The president views this entire situation as very unfair, not just for Russians and Ukrainians who have lost their lives, but also for the American people and the American taxpayer who were footing the bill for this war effort before President Trump put a stop to it,” she said.

Advertisement

In fact, America’s allies in Western Europe have provided more in both military and financial assistance to Ukraine since the invasion started four years ago.

Trump’s statement on Monday night was in keeping with numerous other remarks Trump has made since returning to office. During the infamous visit by Zelenskyy to the Oval Office a year ago, Trump essentially blamed Ukraine for getting invaded and chided Zelenskyy for starting a war against a larger and more powerful neighbor.

Last June, in response to a Ukrainian attack on a Russian airfield, Trump again sided with Russia.

“They gave Putin a reason to go in and bomb the hell out of them last night,” he told reporters.

Advertisement

Trump, who at the time of the invasion called Putin a “genius” and “savvy” and later claimed while campaigning for office that his great relationship with Putin would let him end the fighting on his first day back in the White House, has instead failed to convince the dictator to make any concessions.

Heading into an August meeting with Putin in Alaska, Trump claimed there would be “consequences” for Putin if he did not agree to a ceasefire. Trump literally rolled out a red carpet for Putin and honored him with a flyover of military jets. Putin did not agree to a ceasefire and suffered no consequences.

And last month, Trump boasted that Putin had agreed to his request not to attack Ukrainian cities and towns for a week because of the extreme cold weather. Putin continued the attacks throughout the entire period, after which Trump claimed Putin had honored his pledge.

Trump, nevertheless, continues to boast of his “relationship” with the murderous dictator whose actions in 2023 led to war crime charges by the International Criminal Court. In late August, he showed off a photo of himself and Putin that Putin had sent him. More recently, he has hung a large photo of the two of them in the West Wing.

Advertisement

“Trump looks more and more impotent,” said Fiona Hill, a Russia expert who served on the White House National Security Council in Trump’s first term. “Which is more why he wants Zelenskyy to give it up, to capitulate.”

The de facto tilt away from Ukraine and toward Russia was tacitly acknowledged by Secretary of State Marco Rubio’s visit to the Munich Security Conference last weekend, where he skipped a meeting to discuss Ukraine with traditional U.S. allies. His visit there was highlighted by a speech in which he emphasized a “blood and soil” Christian nationalist message regarding the bonds between the United States and Europe, rather than the one of shared values of individualism and freedom that sprang from the European Enlightenment that American leaders have historically praised.

That new approach was then punctuated by visits to Hungary and Slovakia, which are currently led by the most pro-Russia leaders in Europe. Rubio, who seven years ago warned about Hungarian leader Viktor Orban’s turn toward autocracy, on Monday gave him the endorsement of the U.S. government in his coming election.

His remarks and his itinerary worried Europeans and their leaders, who see Russia’s invasion of Ukraine not as a faraway problem, but a potential preview of what might happen to their own countries.

Advertisement

In response to a query, State Department spokesman Tommy Pigott insulted HuffPost but did not address why Rubio had visited only pro-Russia leaders after his Munich visit and why he had endorsed Orban.

“S.V. Date is a low IQ, anti-Trump clown masquerading as a blogger,” Pigott wrote in a statement. “The secretary met with dozens of leaders from all across the world last weekend in Munich, including Volodymyr Zelenskyy. To claim they were all pro-Russian is an idiotic and bizarre claim. In addition to his historic speech at the Munich Security Conference, Secretary Rubio visited European allies in the region.”

It was not immediately clear what made Rubio’s speech “historic.”

Putin’s Four-Year-Old Quagmire

Advertisement

Ironically, Trump’s continued insistence that Ukraine give away its territory to get a ceasefire comes as its army has increased the lethality of its strikes against Russian troops in Ukraine. According to both Zelenskyy and outside analysts, Ukraine’s military is now killing and injuring more invading soldiers each month than the 35,000 or so that Putin is able to conscript to replace them.

“Increased losses on the battlefield and declining, expensive recruitment likely contributed to the loss rate finally exceeding recruitment rate,” said Kateryna Stepanenko, a research fellow at the Institute for the Study of War.

In a report last month, the Center for Strategic and International Studies estimated that Russia, since the invasion began in 2022, has suffered 1.2 million military casualties, including as many as 325,000 deaths. In contrast, the United States lost 47,434 service members over a decade in Vietnam and 6,897 over two decades in Afghanistan and Iraq.

As a result, Putin has implemented an involuntary draft in some areas of Russia as well as increased his reliance on mercenaries from Central Asia, Cambodia, Pakistan and Africa, among other places.

Advertisement

“There are all kinds of people who are getting press-ganged into going to the front,” Hill said.

Leaders of several African nations, in fact, have publicly called for Putin to stop recruiting young men — who are frequently getting killed quickly after deployment — from their countries.

Last week, Kenya’s Foreign Minister Musalia Mudavadi, who called the recruitment of Kenyan nationals “unacceptable and clandestine,” announced a trip to Moscow to discuss the matter.

Experts also doubt that Putin’s decision to increase his attacks on civilians in their homes and workplaces will have the intended effect of wearing down their will.

Advertisement

“This is like the blitz bombing campaign… he wants to punish them and pummel them,” Hill said. “What it does do is make the people under bombardment more willing to resist.”

“His offensives don’t take much ground and the price is high for what he does take,” Townsend said of Putin. “So hitting Ukrainian civilians and the energy grid is his weapon to hit Zelenskyy domestically, hoping to get the people riled up and moving against Zelenskyy. That tactic didn’t work for Hitler against the Brits and I don’t think it will work with Ukraine either.”

Trump’s affinity for Putin, now manifesting itself in his war of conquest, is decades old. Trump publicly tried to befriend the dictator in 2013 and spent years, including the period when he ran for president in 2016, trying to build a Trump Tower in Moscow.

In that election, Trump willingly accepted and used Russian assistance as he campaigned against Democrat Hillary Clinton, even though he knew it was coming from Russia. He later stood beside Putin at a news conference in Helsinki and said he believed Putin’s denials of interfering in the election over his own intelligence agencies’ analysis.

Advertisement

To this day, Trump continues to call the investigation into that election interference a “hoax” that has also unfairly impugned Putin’s good name.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025