We hope you love the products we recommend! All of them were independently selected by our editors. Just so you know, HuffPost UK may collect a share of sales or other compensation from the links on this page if you decide to shop from them. Oh, and FYI – prices are accurate and items in stock as of time of publication.

When I was a teenager, the pinnacle of high street shopping was undeniably Topshop.

I could (and did) while away hours browsing row upon row of stylish shoes and clothes with my pals of a Saturday afternoon.

And when I first experienced the massive flagship Oxford Street branch? Let’s just say I got lost in there, but I didn’t mind in the slightest.

After the pandemic did a major number on already struggling in-person retail, which saw the closure of Topshop’s stores, shopping on the high street just hasn’t looked the same.

But now, 32 John Lewis stores across the nation have given Topshop a high street home once more.

It’s like 2010 all over again – except the clothes are fit for 2026.

From edgy leather jackets to trendy barrel-legged jeans to elegant dresses and more, here are the best bits to shop before they’re gone.

And (unsurprisingly) this latest collection is already going fast…

Bryan Mbeumo has scored 10 goals since joining Manchester United from Brentford and has been praised for his impact at Old Trafford

Bryan Mbeumo’s influence at Manchester United has hugely benefited his teammates, according to Louis Saha. United brought in Mbeumo last summer from Brentford in a transfer worth up to £65million with the possibility of an additional £6million in add-ons.

Since his arrival at United, Mbeumo has netted 10 goals in all competitions, including nine in the Premier League. That performance has helped the Red Devils in rising to fourth position in the Premier League standings, with securing Champions League qualification being the primary objectivefrom now until the end of the campaign.

Mbeumo has delivered some crucial strikes for United in recent weeks following Michael Carrick’s appointment as the club’s interim head coach, with goals in the victories against Manchester City, Arsenal and Tottenham Hotspur. With Mbeumo making a significant impression during his debut campaign at Old Trafford, former United forward Louis Saha has outlined why such an impact can influence the entire squad.

READ MORE: Man United told to sign ‘two monsters’ as Casemiro replacements identifiedREAD MORE: Marcus Rashford learns Barcelona transfer plan as star gives agent ‘clear instructions’

FOLLOW OUR MAN UTD FB PAGE! Latest United news and more on our dedicated Facebook page

“Mbeumo has definitely had an impact, and this is a player who embodies the confidence, the drive, and the combativity of the team,” Saha told AceOdds.

“Every player has to understand this quickly when signing for a new club. He showed that straight away, but he’s also a quality player. He’s very balanced. When he makes a mistake, he comes back straight away. There’s no second thought.”

“It’s an obligation for forwards to give that effort and tempo because if the forward is lazy, it brings a similar feeling across the team and spreads like a virus. It’s important to have committed players up front who work hard.

“When you have Mbeumo, Cunha, and Bruno Fernandes, who show commitment, it spreads, and you get rewarded.” Saha’s assessment of Mbeumo follows similar glowing praise from his United teammate Matheus Cunha, who also sung the Cameroon international’s praises.

“He’s very intelligent, he’s very clever,” Cunha told Premier League Productions earlier this month. “So he can use his strength very, very good, like going to space, he shoots so well, so good. This is the kind of number nine we need to have.

“Of course, he’s someone that helped us so much and it’s a pleasure to play with him. He’s more than the position that he plays. Being around him in the pitch, we know he can create something special.”

Ensure our latest sport headlines always appear at the top of your Google Search by making us a Preferred Source. Click here to activate or add us as Preferred Source in your Google search settings.

“While speculative, if the US judges that further action is needed to deal with that specific threat, and if again we believe such action is in our national interest and to protect vital UK security interests, then we should grant the use of our bases if and where required, including RAF bases in the UK, and Diego Garcia.”

Persistent concerns about poor behaviour in UK secondary schools have led to the widespread implementation of disciplinary behaviour management strategies. These include the use of isolation rooms, where children are sent to work alone.

In some schools, it may also include zero-tolerance sanction systems such as “Ready to Learn”. This is an approach in which a graduated sanction system is applied for non-compliance: any minor rule-breaking gets a warning, and any further infractions mean going to isolation.

However, a new wave of research is challenging the long-standing dominance of punitive strategies. My ongoing research with colleagues has shed light on the perspectives of young people, school staff and behaviour experts, revealing the need for a critical reassessment of school behaviour management policies and practices.

Our study on behaviour in schools was initiated by members of our Young People’s Advisory Group, which provides a way for young people aged between ten and 18 to contribute to health and care research. The young people raised deep concerns about the impact of disciplinary behaviour management strategies being used in secondary schools.

We systematically reviewed the evidence to investigate the impact of disciplinary strategies on students, and found they may have a negative impact on mental health and wellbeing and behaviour. We then interviewed 15 young people and 17 secondary school staff and experts in behaviour to understand their views and experiences.

The young people we worked with felt that disciplinary behaviour management strategies, particularly isolation use, were ineffective at addressing poor behaviour. They also believed that it had a negative effect on their mental health and wellbeing, as well as their academic and social lives. They described the Ready to Learn approach as harsh, confusing, and inconsistent. One said:

If you had the wrong-coloured socks on or something like that you’d get a warning or a detention. Then that would lead to you getting angry and you’d get an isolation.

Another commented that: “They don’t try to find out why you’ve done it or anything like that. They just put you in isolation. They don’t really care.”

Addressing causes

The young people voiced a preference for disciplinary approaches rooted in relationships and understanding. Approaches that seek to address the causes of behavioural issues, rather than those that rely on sanctions and exclusionary practices. One suggested:

People would go to a room and sit down on a table with everybody, work together to work out what they did wrong in the lesson, how they could be better next time. And not only what and how, but why. Why is this occurring and then that would also create a platform for anyone to seek help and support of any needs that they had as well.

We also talked to school staff. Some described Ready to Learn as beneficial due to its clarity, consistency, and ability to reduce classroom disruption. Its centralised structure, affordability, and simplicity were seen as advantages. However most expressed the desire for a more therapeutic approach alongside Ready to Learn.

One teacher said:

What we’re missing, is a complementary or alternative narrative at whole-school level to RTL [Ready to Learn]. So, the idea of RTL sitting as a structure but alongside therapeutic or trauma-informed, more relational approaches to dealing with behaviour.

Interestingly, both school staff and experts in behaviour agreed on what encourages positive behaviour. They mentioned clarity, consistency, fairness, and – crucially – positive communication and relationships. They described what works: a supportive school culture that is warm and structured with predictable routines and boundaries, and high expectations delivered with empathy and support.

Here, the use of relational practices is key. This approach recognises behaviour as a form of communication, and aims to build relationships with students to help them understand their emotions and behaviour rather than punishing them.

One student described how this could work:

Talking to the student, trying to help them. Even if they’ve got anger issues and they’re being rude all the time, they could have something that’s causing them to be like that. I think that would be more beneficial.

But relational practices are rarely used. “We aren’t trained, we don’t have that expertise,” a deputy headteacher explained. “So even if we had time for it, we can’t necessarily implement it because we don’t know what we’re doing if I’m honest.”

Schools face significant structural and cultural barriers. Government and most school policies encourage disciplinary behaviour management strategies and a focus on academic outcomes. They are embedded in schools and staff fear change and loss of control. Some school staff see their role as to impart knowledge, not provide pastoral care. Most lack training and expertise in relational approaches and schools face resource constraints.

Disciplinary behaviour management strategies offer an illusion of control but are failing to improve behaviour in meaningful and lasting ways. With growing evidence, especially from those directly affected, suggesting that they may be doing more harm than good, a rethink is needed.

This isn’t about going soft on behaviour. It’s about creating compassionate, inclusive schools that are smart about how they view and respond to poor behaviour.

The female driver was arrested while collecting children from school

Police in Co Tyrone arrested a suspected drink driver who was collecting children from school on Thursday afternoon.

Officers responded to a report of the suspected drunk driver and quickly located the vehicle before making an arrest of a female on suspicion of driving whilst unfit through alcohol/drugs, endangering children and for failing to provide a roadside sample.

Once in custody, the driver provided a reading nearly four times the legal limit.

Posting on Facebook, the PSNI said: “This afternoon, Police in Cookstown received a shocking report of a suspected drink driver collecting children from school.

“Officers quickly located the vehicle and arrested the female driver on suspicion of driving whilst unfit through alcohol/drugs, endangering children and for failing to provide a roadside sample.

“Once in custody, the driver provided a reading of 132 — nearly four times the legal limit of 35.

“This is not just irresponsible — it is profoundly reckless and could have had devastating consequences for those children, other road users, and pedestrians.

“Driving under the influence is never acceptable. If you suspect someone is driving while impaired, report it. Your call could save a life.”

Want to see more of the stories you love from Belfast Live? Making us your preferred source on Google means you’ll get more of our exclusives, top stories and must-read content straight away. To add Belfast Live as a preferred source, simply click here

Women are more likely than men to be diagnosed with dementia. While researchers have some idea of the factors that elevate risk, it’s still not entirely clear why this happens. But a recent study suggests that the menopause could play a key role in increased vulnerability to Alzheimer’s disease.

Researchers at the University of Cambridge analysed brain scans from nearly nearly 125,000 women. They found the menopause is associated with measurable reductions in grey matter (brain areas where information is processed and analysed). They also identified volume reductions in brain regions involved in memory, emotion, attention and decision-making.

These changes were also linked to poorer sleep, increased anxiety and depression and slower reaction times. Importantly, the affected regions overlap with those most vulnerable in Alzheimer’s disease (the most common form of dementia).

This does not mean, however, that menopause causes dementia. But it does suggest that menopause may represent a critical neurological transition – one that can influence brain health trajectories for years or even decades afterwards.

These findings have brought the influence of biological sex on brain health into sharper focus. These findings may also bring us closer to understanding why women are not only at greater risk of Alzheimer’s disease, but a range of other neurological conditions – including multiple sclerosis and depression.

Factors affecting women’s dementia risk

Although women face a higher risk of dementia, their brains often show remarkable resilience.

Throughout much of life, women tend to outperform men on certain verbal memory tasks, and often show greater resistance to early cognitive decline.

But this resilience could be a double-edged sword, masking underlying brain changes for longer.

In Alzheimer’s disease, women often show fewer symptoms early on, despite accumulating signs of the disease in the brain. When symptoms do emerge, decline can appear faster and more dramatic – partly because the brain has already been compensating for damage for years.

There are many other crucial social and biological differences between men and women that may explain why brain health outcomes can vary so broadly, as well.

Cognitive reserve, for instance. This is the brain’s ability to adapt and maintain a certain level of function, even when faced with damage (including that caused by dementia and Alzheimer’s). Education, intellectually demanding work, being socially and physically active and lifelong learning all help build cognitive reserve.

Not only is cognitive reserve shaped by biology, it’s also shaped by social realities. For instance, many women have experienced interrupted education, chronic stress or limited access to healthcare. These factors can quietly erode cognitive reserve over time – even while women continue to function at a high level.

At the same time, strong social networks, emotional intelligence and adaptability, qualities often reinforced in women, may enhance resilience and delay the appearance of symptoms.

Another key factor in dementia risk lies in immune function differences between sexes.

Women generally have stronger immune responses than men. While this protects against infections, it can also increase vulnerability to autoimmune conditions (where the immune system becomes overactive). The immune response can particularly become overactive as women age or during periods of hormonal change.

This heightened immune activity extends to the brain. Chronic neuroinflammation, often caused by a dysregulated immune system, is increasingly recognised as a contributor to Alzheimer’s disease, as well as multiple sclerosis and mood disorders. Women’s stronger immune activation may therefore raise risk for certain brain conditions, especially during periods of hormonal instability – such as menopause.

Chromosomes also matter.

Women have two X chromosomes, while men have one X and one Y in most cases. Many immune-related genes are located on the X chromosome. But some of these genes are able to escape the usual process that switches off their activity in women.

This can lead to higher expression of immune system and inflammatory genes – potentially increasing susceptibility to autoimmune and neuroinflammatory disorders.

The menopause link

One of the most important insights from the recent Cambridge study concerns brain metabolism.

The brain is an energy-hungry organ. It primarily uses glucose (sugar) as it’s main source of energy.

Oestrogen plays a significant role in how brain cells use glucose. Oestrogen helps brain cells use glucose efficiently, supporting the energy needed for thinking and memory.

But when oestrogen levels fall during the menopause, the brain may become less efficient at generating energy from glucose. This can create a mild, chronic energy shortfall in vulnerable brain regions. Over time, this metabolic stress may increase susceptibility to processes linked to Alzheimer’s.

This metabolic aspect could also help explain why symptoms such as brain fog, fatigue, mood changes and sleep disruption are common during the menopause.

It also offers a possible biological bridge between menopause and later-life neurological conditions, including Alzheimer’s.

Alzheimer’s and other brain disorders develop under different biological conditions in women and men. Studies on brain health, as well as tests, treatments and prevention strategies, must reflect that reality.

Factors such as hormones, metabolism, lifestyle and immune function not only affect how Alzheimer’s and other brain disorders develop, but also how they interact with and affect each other.

But for decades, research has ignored women, with studies investigating women’s issues being underfunded. Clinical trials on brain health have also failed to acknowledge sex as a potential modifying factor.

Some studies have completely excluded women – with peri- and post-menopausal women particularly overlooked. As a result, many of the treatments available (including those which slow dementia) are developed and prescribed without considering how hormonal changes may alter drug metabolism.

The result is a healthcare system poorly equipped to recognise early brain changes in women or to intervene at the most effective time.

Everything we currently know is pointing towards an important message: women’s brains are complex, adaptive and shaped by forces (such as hormonal transitions throughout the lifespan) that medicine is only beginning to acknowledge. Recognising both the risks women face and the resilience they carry is the first step toward more equitable, effective brain care.

The inaugural meeting of Donald Trump’s board of peace in Washington on February 19 caps a busy week for US diplomacy – though, not necessarily for the country’s professional diplomats. These people have been largely sidelined in the close-knit circle of the US president’s personal envoys, his former real-estate business partner Steve Witkoff and son-in-law Jared Kushner.

Earlier in the week, Witkoff and Kushner attended two separate sets of negotiations in the Swiss city of Geneva. They first sat down for indirect talks with Iran before then leading negotiations between Russia and Ukraine. They then dashed back to Washington to attend the board of peace meeting.

At best, Witkoff and Kushner have a mixed track record of diplomatic success. Kushner was a key mediator in the Abraham accords during Trump’s first term in office. Designed to normalise relations between Israel and other states across the Middle East, the accords have failed to create sustainable momentum for regional peace and stability.

So far, only the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, Morocco and Sudan have established full diplomatic relations with Israel. Saudi Arabia, an influential player in the Middle East, has not followed suit.

Witkoff has been credited with playing a key role in mediating the January 2025 ceasefire between Israel and Hamas and the Gaza peace plan later that year. This latter plan, with endorsement from the UN security council, gave rise to Trump’s board of peace.

Both men have also been at the centre of efforts to end Russia’s war against Ukraine. Witkoff has been involved from the start of Trump’s second term, with Kushner joining more recently at the end of 2025.

Yet, neither Kushner’s addition or a greater focus on a parallel track of negotiations between Washington and Moscow focused on the mutual economic opportunities that peace between Russia and Ukraine would create have brought the warring sides closer to a deal.

Taken together, the outsized roles that Witkoff and Kushner are playing in US diplomacy despite their limited success expose a fundamental misunderstanding of peacemaking at the heart of Trump’s approach to international affairs.

Peace deals are generally complex. To get one across the line usually requires mediators and support teams that are deeply knowledgeable of the conflict in which they are mediating and have broad knowledge of how a plethora of issues can be resolved in a technical sense.

Above all, they need to understand what has driven the parties to conflict and what might induce them to cooperate. While material incentives such as the promise of economic development in exchange for peace are important, warring parties often also have symbolic and psychological needs. These also need to be addressed to ensure the parties sign on the dotted line.

Having just two people with little prior experience of diplomacy and almost no expertise on either of the two conflicts they are currently mediating simultaneously is a recipe for failure. It is likely to lead to a deal being pushed that is simply unattainable in the short term because at least one party will not sign.

And if a deal is, against the odds, agreed because of high pressure on one or both sides, it is likely to be unsustainable in the long term as at least one of the parties will probably defect and violence will resume. This is particularly likely if a deal lacks sufficient guarantees, which lowers the threshold for defection for parties who are not negotiating in good faith.

Ukraine peace negotiations

It is easy to see how such calculations apply in the context of the war against Ukraine. The Ukrainian president, Volodymyr Zelensky, has repeatedly made it clear that the Kremlin’s demands – especially Ukrainian withdrawal from the territory in the east it has successfully defended against Russia’s aggression – are not something he will agree to.

Even if he did, such a deal would almost certainly be rejected in a referendum. It will be psychologically close to impossible for Ukraine and Ukrainians to accept the humiliation of giving up something they have not lost, to reward Putin’s aggression and to be sold down the river by Trump in his pursuit of an economic side-deal with his Russian counterpart.

Similarly, it is easy to see that Russia is not negotiating in good faith. Moscow is presenting Kyiv with an ultimatum while destroying as much as possible of the country, both to weaken Ukraine’s will to resist and to undermine its future recovery. Add to that Russian resistance to credible security guarantees and the true intent of Russia’s negotiation strategy is not to achieve sustainable peace but to prepare for the next war.

If and when negotiations on Iran or Ukraine break down or the agreements they might achieve collapse, there will also need to be supporting frameworks in place that can manage the consequences. Trump’s board of peace, which looks like a privatised version of the UN, is unsuitable for such a task.

Not only does it lack the legitimacy the UN has. There is also no indication that its members – be they the countries attending the inaugural meeting or the people serving at Trump’s pleasure in its executive structures – have the intent or capacity to take any actual peace-making role.

The board’s membership is, numerically at least, far below Trump’s aspirations. Only 24 of the 60 or so invitations sent out have been accepted, with traditional US allies in Europe and the G7 absent from the group. Among the attendees at the Washington meeting are the likes of Azerbaijan, Pakistan, Egypt and even Belarus, a country sanctioned by the US and Europe for its support of Russia’s campaign in Ukraine.

Trump’s board of peace may be able to establish a free economic zone here or there and generate some real-estate development. But much of that will be done to benefit its members’ wallets or egos – or both.

WASHINGTON (AP) — The U.S. trade deficit slipped modestly in 2025, a year in which President Donald Trump upended global commerce by slapping double digit tariffs on imports from most countries. But the gap in the trade of goods such machinery and aircraft — the main focus of Trump’s protectionist policies — hit a record last year despite sweeping import taxes.

Overall, the gap the between the goods and services the U.S. sells other countries and what it buys from them narrowed to just over $901 billion, from $904 billion in 2024, but it was still the third-highest on record, the Commerce Department reported Thursday.

Exports rose 6% last year, and imports rose nearly 5%.

And the U.S. deficit in the trade of goods widened 2% to a record $1.24 trillion last year as American companies boosted imports of computer chips and other tech goods from Taiwan to support massive investments in artificial intelligence.

Amid continuing tensions with Bejing, the deficit in the goods trade with China plunged nearly 32% to $202 billion in 2025 on a sharp drop in both exports to and imports from the world’s second-biggest economy. But trade was diverted away from China. The goods gap with Taiwan doubled to $147 billion and shot up 44%, to $178 billion, with Vietnam.

Economist Chad Bown, senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, said the widening gaps with Taiwan and Vietnam might put a “bulls eye’’ on them this year if Trump focuses more on the lopsided trade numbers and less on the U.S. rivalry with China.

In 2025, U.S. goods imports from Mexico outpaced exports by nearly $197 billion, up from a 2024 gap of $172 billion. But the goods deficit with Canada shrank by 26% to $46 billion. The United States this year is negotiating a renewal of a pact Trump reached with those two countries in his first term.

The U.S. ran a bigger surplus in the trade of services such as banking and tourism last year — $339 billion, up from $312 billion in 2024.

The trade gap surged from January-March as U.S. companies tried to import foreign goods ahead of Trump’s taxes, then narrowed most of the rest of the year.

Trump’s tariffs are a tax paid by U.S. importers and often passed along to their customers as higher prices. But they haven’t had as much impact on inflation as economists originally expected. Trump argues that the tariffs will protect U.S. industries, bringing manufacturing back to America and raise money for the U.S. Treasury.

The former Wales captain was a master at dealing with referees – with the current side having frequently been on the wrong side of the officials

Wales coach Steve Tandy revealed his side have been taking advice from Sam Warburton in order to stay on the right side of referees in the Six Nations.

Discipline has been an early problem for Wales under Tandy. In his first five games in charge, Wales coughed up 65 penalties – receiving 10 yellow cards and one 20-minute red.

However, the 54-12 defeat to France last weekend, while one-sided on the scoreboard, did at least see Wales keep 15 players on the pitch for the full 80 minutes.

Last week, Tandy had suggested Wales’ lowly status in world rugby had perhaps led to a “natural bias” against his side from referees – a concern that Warren Gatland had also held in his second stint.

Having seen Wales take a step forward in terms of their discipline, conceding just nine penalties against France, Tandy again spoke about how his side are improving in that facet of the game.

“I think the referee’s interpretation has huge influence on games and again, we go back and forth, seeking clarification, a lot of things where probably on the weekend I thought the referee did really well,” said Tandy after naming his team to play Scotland. “I thought the team of five were really good really consistent.

Ensure our latest sport headlines always appear at the top of your Google Search by making us a Preferred Source. Click here to activate or add us as Preferred Source in your Google search settings

“I thought the manner they spoke to boys, but also we helped ourselves as well in large aspects. And again, I think there’s more that we could have been done.

“There’s interpretation, so you probably know there’s going to be four or five penalties that you’re not going to agree on, but that’s the game. You’ve got to be understanding that, but we’ve got to create clearer pictures.

“We still think there were probably three in the (France) game that we didn’t need to give away. But also it’s trusting the referees.

“Dewi (Lake) is growing as a captain. He interacted with the referee (for a French try that was disallowed), being really specific that France 14 was in front of the ball, asking ‘Can you please go and have a look at that?’

“I think the way we’re interacting is better. And I think it’s for us as coaches understanding we’ve got to control what we can do, but also the game is on the grass.

“It’s how you interact with referees and create the perception because we’re 11th of the world. We’re not refereed differently but there’s also that natural perception in games.

“Against England, there was a couple of harsh ones where you had Daf (Jenkins) going round, where you look at the next English lineout and the same thing happens.

“But that’s what we’ve got to live with too that’s we’ve got to be able to respond to those kind of things and adapt.

“That’s why we’re working heavily and it’s been really good to get teams of three referees in. We’ve been hard on the offside line but also interacting with referees or how they like to be spoken to the best.

“Because it’s not always going at referees for every moment, but rather picking and choosing (your moments) so that’s where Dewi, with all the leaders, have been working and reviewing that aspect of the performance too.”

Part of that has been leaning on Warburton for help.

Wales vs Scotland VIP tickets

This article contains affiliate links, we will receive a commission on any sales we generate from it. Learn more

from,£625

Seat Unique

Book tickets here

Seat Unique offers VIP hospitality tickets for Wales vs Scotland on February 21.

Advertisement

The two-time Lions captain was frequently praised for how he dealt with referees during his career, with the way he communicated with Romain Poite during the pivotal third Test against New Zealand on the 2017 Lions tour often pointed to as a perfect piece of ‘referee whispering’.

The former Wales captain said in a Times column before the tournament began that he had been in to visit Tandy’s team, with the Wales coach opening up more on what the former flanker had told his players.

“We’ve had Sam in, he was brilliant and we’ve spoken to him about his leadership,” said Tandy. “He was saying how he’d only go for the big things but he’d always speak really well.

“He could be firm but I think then you build a reputation when you only go to referees for a big moment. I thought James (Doleman, the referee for the France game) and Dewi’s relationship on the weekend (was good).

“Matt Carley, I think it’s his 50th game, which tells you everything about an international referee, he’s been in high-profile games and it’s making sure that we don’t give him pictures to come down on us, but also having that interaction and relationship that we can work a way through the game.”