U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs have lost $462.7 million during the September 8–11 trading week, while Ethereum funds have gained $196.9 million and Solana funds have drawn a smaller $9.7 million inflow.

Farside Investors’ Bitcoin ETF data shows that the funds lost money each day from Tuesday through Friday. U.S. markets were closed Monday, September 7, for Labor Day, leaving four sessions in the reporting week. Farside’s separate tables put Ethereum and Solana funds in positive territory, while Hyperliquid funds ended with outflows.

Bitcoin ETF losses peaked on Thursday

Bitcoin funds began Tuesday with $46.6 million in net outflows. The daily loss rose to $120.2 million Wednesday and $282.7 million Thursday before easing to $13.2 million Friday, according to Farside. The four sessions erased part of the $986.7 million that the same funds had gained in the previous trading week.

ARK 21Shares’ ARKB had the largest weekly outflow among individual Bitcoin funds at $234.2 million. Its $164.3 million loss on Thursday accounted for much of that amount. Grayscale’s GBTC followed with $129.1 million in weekly outflows, including $65.5 million on Tuesday and $36.4 million on Thursday.

BlackRock’s IBIT lost a net $52.5 million over the week. After taking in $10.7 million on Tuesday, it posted outflows of $19.5 million on Wednesday, $24.5 million on Thursday, and $19.2 million on Friday. Fidelity’s FBTC finished the week down $50.7 million, while VanEck’s HODL lost $13.1 million.

A few products still drew money. Morgan Stanley’s MSBT gained $19.7 million across the four sessions, with inflows recorded each day. Bitwise’s BITB ended with a $1.9 million gain after its $14.5 million Tuesday inflow was largely offset by a $12.6 million Thursday outflow.

The weekly flow figures describe subscriptions and redemptions in U.S.-listed funds. They do not show whether a particular holder bought or sold Bitcoin directly. In August, crypto.news reported Jane Street held more than $1 billion in spot Bitcoin ETF shares at the end of June, including roughly $828 million in IBIT. The regulatory filing showed an earlier quarter-end position, not the firm’s holdings during the September trading week.

Ethereum ETFs turned positive after Friday’s inflow

Ethereum funds entered Friday with a combined $19.5 million net outflow for the week. Farside recorded a $24.3 million loss Tuesday, a $34.7 million gain Wednesday, and a $29.9 million loss Thursday. Friday’s $216.4 million inflow took the weekly result to a $196.9 million gain.

BlackRock’s ETHA supplied most of Friday’s inflow, adding $148.8 million. The fund finished the week with $139.9 million in net inflows after a $18.6 million outflow on Thursday, which partly offset its gains on Wednesday and Friday. BlackRock’s staked Ethereum fund, ETHB, added $55.1 million for the week, with $22.9 million arriving Wednesday and $18.3 million Friday.

Bitwise’s ETHW gained $29.1 million, all on Friday. VanEck’s ETHV drew $3.7 million the same day. Fidelity’s FETH moved the other way: a $25.2 million outflow on Thursday left it with a $3.9 million weekly loss despite inflows on Tuesday and Friday.

Grayscale’s ETHE lost $17.3 million over the four sessions. Its smaller ETH fund lost $11.8 million after a $24.6 million Tuesday outflow outweighed later gains. Ethereum ETFs brought in $215.3 million in the previous week, based on Farside’s daily totals, making the latest four-session gain slightly smaller despite Friday’s large inflow.

The listed products give U.S. investors a way to trade exposure to Bitcoin or Ethereum through fund shares. Earlier crypto.news covered Morgan Stanley’s holdings in BlackRock’s Bitcoin ETF, which its second-quarter filing put at about 16.5 million shares after a 23% increase. The report also described its exposure to Ether and Solana; those quarter-end holdings cannot be used to identify who drove this week’s ETF flows.

Solana ETFs gained $9.7 million

Solana funds posted their only positive day on Wednesday, when Farside recorded $11.2 million in net inflows. Smaller losses of $0.7 million Tuesday, $0.5 million Thursday, and $0.3 million Friday reduced the weekly total to a $9.7 million gain.

Bitwise’s BSOL accounted for $9.5 million of the weekly inflow. The fund received $11.2 million on Wednesday, then lost $1.4 million on Thursday and $0.3 million on Friday. VanEck’s FSOL added $0.9 million Thursday, and its TSOL fund gained $0.5 million Tuesday. Grayscale’s GSOL recorded a $1.2 million outflow Tuesday and no further net movement in the Farside table.

Hyperliquid funds lost money in three sessions

Hyperliquid ETFs recorded $26.5 million in weekly net outflows. Farside listed a $13 million loss Tuesday, followed by $5.3 million Wednesday and $8.2 million Friday; its table showed no net flow Thursday.

Bitwise’s BHYP accounted for $20.2 million of the weekly loss. It lost $8.1 million Tuesday, $5.3 million Wednesday, and $6.8 million Friday. The 21Shares THYP fund lost $6.3 million across Tuesday and Friday, while Farside recorded no net movement for HYPG during the week.

Japan’s Digital Agency has disclosed a cyberattack on a government network that may have exposed personal information belonging to approximately 246,000 public servants, contractors and other people involved in government work.

The Digital Agency said on Sept. 11 that an investigation into its Government Solution Service, or GSS, found that an outside attacker exploited a vulnerability in a virtual private network device and gained unauthorized access to files containing personal data.

The agency first detected unusual activity on June 25, when a maintenance and operations account was used to access a large number of files stored on its servers. An investigation later established on July 9 that a third party had entered the system through the VPN vulnerability.

Officials disabled the affected maintenance account that day and blocked communications between the compromised network equipment and external systems to prevent further unauthorized access. A subsequent investigation carried out with outside security specialists found that some files may have been taken from the network.

Japan data breach may have exposed 246,000 records

The potentially compromised information belongs to employees of government ministries and agencies using GSS, public servants who worked with those organizations, and businesses and individuals involved in their operations.

Around 189,000 records concern employees of GSS member organizations and other public servants involved in their work, including employees of incorporated administrative agencies. Another roughly 57,000 records relate to businesses and individuals that worked with GSS organizations.

The affected files contained approximately 236,000 names and 231,000 email addresses. Roughly 94,000 phone numbers and about 1,000 addresses were potentially exposed, with some records containing more than one type of personal information.

Japan’s Digital Agency said the affected data did not contain My Number identification numbers, bank account details or pension numbers. It has confirmed that the personal information of members of the general public was not included in the potentially leaked files.

No misuse of the affected personal information has been identified so far, according to the agency. Officials are working to identify the people whose information may have been compromised and plan to contact them individually.

The agency warned that exposed contact details could potentially be used for impersonation or phishing attempts. It advised affected people not to open unexpected links or attachments or provide passwords, authentication information and credit card details in response to suspicious emails, calls or text messages claiming to come from government bodies.

VPN vulnerability gave attacker access to government systems

The intrusion involved a vulnerability in network equipment used for VPN access, while the large-scale file activity was carried out through an account belonging to maintenance and operations personnel.

The Digital Agency has not identified the attacker publicly or disclosed whether the intrusion was financially motivated. Its statement did not attribute the incident to a ransomware group, state-backed actor or other known hacking organization.

Following the investigation, the agency said it would review how vulnerabilities are managed and improve methods used for external connections to its systems.

The incident emerged during a period of elevated cybercrime activity in Japan. National Police Agency figures cited in local reporting showed the country recorded 123 ransomware attacks during the first half of 2026, the highest total for any six-month period since authorities began tracking the figure.

Security incidents involving compromised access and infrastructure have remained a concern outside government systems as well. A July crypto security report previously covered by crypto.news found that 212 verified crypto incidents caused $1.1 billion in losses during the first half of 2026, with 74% of stolen funds linked to operational security failures instead of exploited smart contract code.

A separate CoinGecko security study published in August calculated that crypto platforms lost $3.63 billion across 245 documented incidents between January 2025 and July 2026. The 10 largest attacks accounted for more than 72.5% of the total amount stolen during that period.

Japan has faced major crypto-linked cyberattacks

Japan has previously dealt with large cyber thefts targeting its cryptocurrency sector, including the attack on DMM Bitcoin that ultimately forced the exchange to wind down its operations.

The DMM Bitcoin breach resulted in the theft of more than 4,500 Bitcoin worth roughly $307 million at the time. Japanese authorities and the FBI later connected the operation to TraderTraitor, a North Korean-linked group associated with other cryptocurrency thefts.

Investigators found that the DMM Bitcoin operation began through social engineering targeting an employee at Ginco, a Japanese cryptocurrency wallet software company that provided services to the exchange. An attacker posing as a recruiter sent the employee a malicious Python script during what appeared to be a pre-employment test.

Access obtained through Ginco was later used to manipulate a legitimate DMM Bitcoin transaction request, according to authorities. The stolen Bitcoin was subsequently traced to wallets controlled by the attackers.

North Korean-linked groups have continued targeting cryptocurrency infrastructure outside Japan. Bybit said in August that its security systems blocked more than 30,000 suspicious withdrawals during the first half of 2026, preventing more than $700 million in potential user losses after the exchange suffered a $1.46 billion theft in February 2025.

The exchange said it had expanded continuous onchain monitoring following the attack, while its security teams processed more than 100,000 alerts with AI assistance during the first half of this year. Bybit’s monitoring systems identified 10 security incidents affecting listed token projects during the period without losses to the exchange.

Other recent breaches have centered on personal information rather than direct theft of digital assets. Israeli crypto broker Bits of Gold began investigating a customer data breach in August after unauthorized access to a third-party system potentially exposed names, identification numbers, email addresses, phone numbers, IP addresses and some banking information.

Bits of Gold said cryptocurrency, customer funds, passwords, identification document scans and full payment card details were not compromised in that incident. The company traced the exposure to third-party software affected by a larger breach and said it began investigating after receiving information about the incident.

In September 2026, Bitcoin (BTC) is fluctuating near the $78,000 mark. Recent market data shows BTC trading at approximately $77,300, with the market keeping a close watch on the Federal Reserve’s upcoming interest rate decision and its potential impact on the cryptocurrency sector. 

Since the start of September, Bitcoin has experienced a notable, rapid rebound—hitting a new high since May—before the rally slowed, causing the price to retreat and consolidate below the $80,000 level. The market is currently characterized by a tug-of-war between bulls and bears. On one hand, the recent rebound has revitalized market confidence; on the other, the Fed’s interest rate decision on September 16 and the impending release of US inflation data could still trigger fresh volatility in the crypto market.

However, for the many holders who do not intend to trade frequently, the question is more straightforward: if BTC fails to resume its upward momentum in the short term, are there ways—beyond simply waiting for price appreciation—to enhance asset utilization efficiency and explore avenues for generating consistent returns?

CPI and the Federal Reserve have become key variables for short-term market trends.

The market is currently awaiting the latest US CPI data, preferring to wait for new macroeconomic figures to confirm the direction for the next phase. Consequently, for long-term BTC investors, repeatedly chasing rallies and panic-selling in the short term is not necessarily the optimal strategy. Traditional BTC holders are accustomed to a straightforward investment logic: buy, hold, and wait for the price to rise. However, this approach entails inconsistent returns, high market volatility risks, and the need for significant time and effort to monitor the market. As a result, BTC holders are shifting their focus from mere price appreciation to asset efficiency; the mining services offered by FTMINING enable BTC holders to engage in new yield-generating models while retaining their digital assets.

Mining services provided by FTMINING

This model involves participating in digital asset mining through remote computing power. Users do not need to purchase mining rigs, deploy hardware, or maintain mining facilities themselves; instead, they simply select a suitable computing power plan. Professional mining facilities handle equipment operation, maintenance, and the actual mining process, while users receive mining returns based on the computing power they have purchased.

The platform utilizes renewable or clean energy sources—such as hydropower, wind power, and solar power—to improve energy efficiency, lower operating costs, and reduce carbon emissions. Compared to the traditional model of building and managing one’s own mining facility, cloud mining offers a lower barrier to entry, ease of use, and no need for equipment maintenance, making it accessible even to beginners.

How should BTC holders use FTMINING?

Step 1: Visit the official website: https://ftmining.com

New users receive a $15 sign-up bonus, plus a $0.75 daily login bonus.

Step 2: Diverse digital asset management experience

The platform supports BTC, ETH, LTC, USDT, USDC, XRP, SOL, DOGE, and BCH, eliminating the need for cumbersome currency conversions and making deposits and withdrawals more convenient.

Step 3: Choose the best contract plan

FTMINING offers a variety of contracts to suit different budgets and goals. Whether you are seeking short-term gains or long-term returns, there is a suitable option for you. (Please visit the official website for more contract details.)

Step 4: Manage the mining process via the platform.

Simply register online and select your hash rate to start mining; once the contract is activated, earnings are automatically deposited into your account, and you can track your returns in real-time on your mobile phone—significantly lowering the barrier to entry for mining.

Reasons to choose FTMINING

Corporate Credibility: FTMINING is an innovative platform specializing in digital asset management and cloud computing services. It operates within UK and EU regulatory frameworks, adhering to principles of compliance, security, and transparency, while undergoing regular financial and security audits by third-party institutions.

Technical Capabilities: The platform utilizes the latest generation of mining hardware to ensure stable hash rate output. Even during periods of global hash rate fluctuation, my earnings have remained relatively stable, demonstrating the platform’s technical reliability.

Fund Security: The platform employs multiple security mechanisms—including bank-grade firewalls, cloud security certifications, multi-signature cold wallets, and asset segregation systems—to provide multi-layered protection for user funds.

From “waiting for a price rise” to “exploring yield”—the value proposition of BTC assets is shifting.

For long-term BTC investors, the traditional approach often involves waiting for market appreciation to generate returns. As the digital asset market evolves, investors are increasingly looking for ways to unlock additional revenue streams alongside their long-term holdings. FTMINING’s cloud mining services offer a unique way to participate in the ecosystem—distinct from simply buying and selling BTC. By leveraging remote computing power for mining operations, investors can explore diversified income models and enhance the value of their idle assets.

Conclusion: Long-term strategies require greater focus during periods of sideways movement.

With BTC fluctuating around $78,000, the market awaits the next directional move. For BTC holders, rather than obsessing over the next candlestick on the chart, it is more productive to focus on a long-term perspective: how to maximize the value of their holdings? FTMINING cloud mining offers a clear solution—enabling holders to participate in mining while retaining their BTC, thereby improving the utilization efficiency of idle digital assets. By shifting from merely waiting for price appreciation to exploring mining-based returns, BTC holders can adopt a more proactive approach to asset management with FTMINING.

Official Website:https://ftmining.com

Customer Support Email: [email protected]

UniCredit has begun exploring an expansion of its digital asset business that could give clients access to crypto custody, brokerage, tokenized investments and stablecoin services.

People familiar with the plans said the Italian bank is selecting a technology provider that could supply the infrastructure needed to hold digital assets and support their purchase and sale, although discussions remain at an early stage and no final decision has been made.

The work could take UniCredit beyond the individual crypto-linked products it has offered professional investors and give the bank technology for a larger set of digital asset services.

Potential uses under consideration include tokenized investment products and fixed-income securities, according to the people. UniCredit is examining how clients could use stablecoins and gain exposure to cryptocurrencies through the infrastructure.

A UniCredit spokesperson declined to comment.

UniCredit considers crypto custody and brokerage infrastructure

The technology provider under consideration would give UniCredit the systems required to custody digital assets and facilitate trading, creating infrastructure that could support several products rather than a single investment offering.

Specific services have yet to be decided, and the bank could change or abandon parts of the plan while discussions continue.

UniCredit has already tested crypto exposure through traditional investment products. In July 2025, crypto.news previously reported that the bank had introduced a structured product linked to IBIT for professional clients in Italy.

The five-year, dollar-denominated investment certificate was tied to BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF and offered full capital protection at maturity. It allowed eligible clients to participate in Bitcoin-linked returns without holding the cryptocurrency directly.

UniCredit has so far concentrated its digital asset activity on professional investors and corporate clients. Building custody and brokerage technology could give the lender another route for offering digital assets through its existing banking operations.

The bank has taken a similar approach to blockchain-based securities. Late last year, UniCredit issued Italy’s first tokenized minibond on a public blockchain, using blockchain infrastructure to issue and transfer a traditional financial instrument.

Its latest discussions cover tokenized fixed-income securities as one of the possible areas where the new infrastructure could be used.

Stablecoins form another part of UniCredit’s plans

Stablecoins are already part of UniCredit’s digital asset strategy through Qivalis, the Amsterdam-based company formed by European banks to develop a euro-denominated stablecoin.

The project initially brought together 10 banks, including UniCredit, BNP Paribas, ING, Banca Sella, KBC, DekaBank, Danske Bank, SEB, CaixaBank and Raiffeisen Bank International. Qivalis is targeting the second half of 2026 for the token’s launch, subject to regulatory approval. 

Its membership has since expanded sharply. In May, Qivalis expanded to 37 banks across 15 European countries after adding 25 institutions, including ABN AMRO, Rabobank, Nordea and Intesa Sanpaolo.

Qivalis plans to operate as an electronic money institution under supervision from the Dutch central bank. The group is seeking to issue a MiCA-compliant token backed 1:1 with euros, with its first uses centered on institutional settlement, treasury operations and tokenized assets.

In April, the banking group selected Fireblocks for infrastructure supporting the planned token. Fireblocks is providing tokenization technology, wallet infrastructure and lifecycle management tools, alongside systems for identity verification and sanctions screening.

UniCredit’s separate technology search could cover stablecoin use by its own clients, according to the people familiar with the bank’s plans. Details on how those services would operate or whether they would connect with Qivalis have not been finalized.

MiCA gives European banks a framework for crypto services

The plans are being considered as European banks increase their work with crypto assets, tokenized securities and blockchain-based settlement under the European Union’s Markets in Crypto-Assets regulation.

MiCA established a common regulatory framework across the bloc for crypto asset service providers and stablecoin issuers, replacing a system where requirements differed between national markets.

Several banks have since moved into areas such as custody, trading and stablecoin infrastructure. Italy’s Banca Sella, another Qivalis member, received Bank of Italy approval to provide crypto custody and transfer services through MiCA’s notification route for credit institutions.

The relationship between banks and stablecoin issuers has brought its own regulatory questions. UniCredit deputy vice chair Elena Carletti, who chairs the bank’s board risk committee, warned in May that Europe could face difficulties responding to stress involving crypto-linked bank deposits.

Carletti cited the 2023 collapse of Silicon Valley Bank, when Circle disclosed that $3.3 billion of reserves backing USDC were held at the failed lender. She said European authorities could have fewer options to provide similar protection because EU deposit insurance is capped at €100,000.

Her comments came while UniCredit was participating in the Qivalis stablecoin project and European lenders were preparing regulated blockchain-based payment and settlement services under MiCA.

Qivalis’ planned token remains scheduled for the second half of 2026, subject to authorization from De Nederlandsche Bank.

UniCredit builds out digital capital markets business

UniCredit has been developing its digital capital markets operations outside cryptocurrency products as well.

This week, the bank announced that it had acquired a minority stake in VC Trade, a German platform focused on lending markets. The investment is intended to expand UniCredit’s digital capital markets capabilities.

Its technology search would add another piece to that work by creating infrastructure capable of holding and trading digital assets directly.

The bank has not disclosed which technology providers are being considered, how much it could spend on the project or when a provider might be selected. Decisions on whether UniCredit will ultimately offer crypto brokerage, custody, stablecoin services or tokenized securities through the system remain under discussion.