Connect with us

Business

Housing crisis needs more supply, not more taxes

Published

on

Housing crisis needs more supply, not more taxes

The familiar sound of the call for changes to Australia’s Capital Gains Tax (CGT) discount is again increasing in volume, with a Senate Select Committee on the Operation of the Capital Gains Discount likely to recommend a reduction in the discount, which translates into higher taxes.

Based on what’s been floated by the government in the press, it feels almost inevitable that a reduction from the current 50 per cent discount is coming. The extent of it we don’t know, but it’s possible it will be restricted to residential property.

The government talks about intergenerational equity and focusing on making housing affordable, especially for the next generation of homeowners. 

Those are important aspirations but the illusion that increasing taxes on investors will unlock supply or reduce prices is just misleading. 

Advertisement

Data from leading industry analysts like PropTrack and Cotality tells us that investor activity is primarily a response to our tight rental market, not the root cause of unaffordability. 

In many places around Australia, rental vacancy rates are at or near historical lows, which is translating into higher rental prices. 

What will reduce rents is more supply of rental properties, not less. You don’t solve a supply problem by penalising those who provide homes to rent.

The push for CGT changes is fundamentally based on the premise that a higher tax burden will result in a more affordable housing market, as investors reduce their appetite for property, allowing more homeowners to enter the market.

Advertisement

But even the Grattan Institute, which is hardly a pro-investor lobby, conceded that such a change would reduce house prices by just 1 per cent. 

The real drivers of price growth are far more fundamental; the undeniable imbalance between demand and supply. 

Homes aren’t suddenly going to become more affordable because investors have to pay a higher rate of tax when they profit on a sale. The outcome is likely to be the opposite of what’s intended. 

Advertisement

Property, for a vast majority of investors, isn’t a get-rich-quick scheme; it’s a long-term wealth building strategy. 

Treasury research shows property investors are long term holders. WA Treasury commentary shows that residential investment property in WA is predominantly held long term, not traded frequently. 

NSW Treasury goes into more detail, with the mean holding period for investors being 13.7 years.  

This is a clear indication that most property owners are long-term asset holders. So, what happens when you hit them with a higher CGT? You don’t encourage more sales. 

Advertisement

You incentivise investors to hold onto their properties for even longer to avoid paying a higher tax on exiting the asset. 

Already some investors have stated to me that they will hold their properties until they retire and sell when they are in a much lower tax bracket.

Australian property owners are already forking out an estimated $67 billion annually through stamp duty, land tax, and capital gains tax alone. This asset class already pays more than its fair share. 

We have a clear, pressing target to build 1.2 million homes over five years. If we are genuinely serious about intergenerational equity and getting more people into home ownership, then our focus must be on supply-side solutions. 

Advertisement

That means tackling planning bottlenecks, addressing infrastructure shortfalls, and particularly the labour shortages in the construction industry.

Increasing a tax that impacts long-term investors, whose role is often to meet rental demand when supply is scarce, is nothing more than a distraction from the real work that needs doing.

Let’s stop talking about penalising property owners and start talking about how we get more homes built. That’s the only path to genuine housing affordability.

Advertisement

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

Broadcom Stock: AI Capex Panic Is Your Opportunity (NASDAQ:AVGO)

Published

on

Broadcom Stock: AI Capex Panic Is Your Opportunity (NASDAQ:AVGO)

This article was written by

I am a fundamental investor and writer who specializes in forensic analysis of company financials. My research blends deep financial-statement work with industry context to identify both overlooked winners and trends in development. I want the story behind the numbers, not just talking points. My primary sector focus is technology and large caps, and I also cover select consumer and industrial names where market trends create opportunity. My investing approach is long-term and evidence-driven: I prioritize cash-flow sustainability, conservative balance-sheet analysis, and buying with a margin of safety. I bring professional experience in financial advice and formal education in accounting to my research. I write on Seeking Alpha to translate my research into readable, actionable insight so readers can make better, risk-aware decisions. Follow for high-conviction idea write-ups.

Analyst’s Disclosure: I/we have a beneficial long position in the shares of AVGO either through stock ownership, options, or other derivatives. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Seeking Alpha’s Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business

US trade deficit in goods reaches record high with Thailand, Vietnam, and Taiwan

Published

on

US trade deficit in goods reaches record high with Thailand, Vietnam, and Taiwan

The United States trade deficit in goods reached an all-time record of $1.24 trillion in 2025, driven by a surge in imports that outpaced export growth despite the imposition of heavy tariffs.

While the widening trade gap contributed to a downward revision of fourth-quarter GDP growth estimates, the high volume of capital goods imports—particularly those related to artificial intelligence and data center infrastructure—indicates sustained business investment.

Key Points

  • The U.S. goods trade deficit hit a historic high of $1.24 trillion in 2025, with the December trade gap widening 32.6% to $70.3 billion, far exceeding economist forecasts.
  • Record-breaking goods trade deficits were recorded with several nations, including Mexico, Vietnam, Taiwan, Ireland, Thailand, and India.
  • In contrast to the global trend, the goods trade deficit with China narrowed significantly, falling to $202.1 billion from $295.5 billion the previous year.
  • Import growth was driven primarily by capital goods such as computers, telecommunications equipment, and computer accessories, largely fueled by the construction of data centers to support artificial intelligence.
  • Despite protectionist trade policies, U.S. manufacturing did not see a resurgence; factory employment decreased by 83,000 jobs between January 2025 and January 2026.

The larger-than-expected trade deficit prompted the Atlanta Federal Reserve to lower its fourth-quarter GDP growth estimate from a 3.6% to a 3.0% annualized rate. While the labor market remains relatively stable, economists noted that hiring has become sluggish due to tariff-related uncertainty and the impact of artificial intelligence.

Ultimately, the data suggests that the aggressive tariff policies failed to reduce overall trade imbalances or spark a manufacturing renaissance, as evidenced by declining factory employment and record deficits with multiple trading partners.

Advertisement

Furthermore, these policies led to increased costs for consumers and businesses, as tariffs raised the prices of imported goods and materials. Many industries reliant on global supply chains faced disruptions, further hampering their competitiveness in international markets. Instead of fostering economic growth, the measures appeared to exacerbate tensions with key trading partners, resulting in retaliatory tariffs that compounded the challenges for exporters.

Continue Reading

Business

Asos co-founder dies after Thailand balcony fall

Published

on

Asos co-founder dies after Thailand balcony fall

Quentin Griffiths co-founded Asos in 2000 and remained a significant shareholder after leaving the firm five years later.

Continue Reading

Business

Garmin Stock Is Surging. There’s More to Its Move Than Solid Earnings.

Published

on

Garmin Stock Is Surging. There’s More to Its Move Than Solid Earnings.

Garmin Stock Is Surging. There’s More to Its Move Than Solid Earnings.

Continue Reading

Business

Closing factory workers paid to help at food bank

Published

on

Closing factory workers paid to help at food bank

Dutch coffee-making giant Jacobs Douwe Egberts (JDE) will close its plant in Banbury this year.

Continue Reading

Business

UK government finances better than expected in January

Published

on

UK government finances better than expected in January

Chief Secretary to the Treasury, James Murray said: “We know there is more to do to stop one in every £10 the government spends going on debt interest, and we will more than halve borrowing by 2030-31 so that money can be spent on policing, schools and the NHS.”

Continue Reading

Business

Fundamentals intact but markets search for fresh triggers, says Karthikraj Lakshmanan

Published

on

Fundamentals intact but markets search for fresh triggers, says Karthikraj Lakshmanan
Indian equities appear to have moved past several key uncertainties — from trade developments to recent earnings — yet the market continues to search for its next catalyst. Speaking to ET Now, Karthikraj Lakshmanan from UTI AMC said the macro backdrop remains supportive, noting that “macros are quite good… Q3 earnings were in line… fundamentals look good,” even though sector-specific corrections have weighed on the index in recent sessions.

He acknowledged the disconnect between positive fundamentals and subdued market performance, as the anchor observed that “on paper everything looks okay… but it is not reflecting on the ticker.” Lakshmanan responded that “flows are difficult to predict… if fundamentals and earnings accelerate, markets will follow,” adding that the environment is increasingly becoming a bottom-up market where stock selection matters more than broad liquidity trends.

Looking ahead, he struck an optimistic tone on growth, pointing out that “FY25–FY26 saw single-digit growth… FY27 could see double-digit GDP and earnings growth,” which he believes should support equities even without major earnings upgrades. On valuations, Lakshmanan said “large caps look more attractive… private banks have reasonable valuations,” highlighting financials as one of the more compelling pockets after recent corrections.

Discussing capital goods, he noted that while “business has done well post-COVID… government capex continues,” valuations in several names remain elevated, making selectivity important for investors. On broader markets, he reiterated that “diversification is a must,” adding that although indices may not show deep cuts, many individual mid- and small-cap stocks have undergone “silent corrections,” creating selective opportunities.

Advertisement

In the consumption space, Lakshmanan said “discretionary and durables have better growth prospects,” while within staples, foods appear structurally stronger. On autos, he observed that “PV growth remains strong… valuations must be watched,” and described the electric vehicle opportunity as evolving gradually rather than offering immediate pure-play opportunities.


Turning to primary markets, he said the “pipeline is strong,” suggesting that muted subscriptions and listings are largely cyclical and reflect market conditions rather than a lack of quality issuers.
Overall, Lakshmanan’s message was clear: while near-term triggers may be elusive, improving growth prospects and steady fundamentals should continue to underpin markets, with disciplined stock selection and valuation awareness remaining key for investors.

Continue Reading

Business

Vita Coco Stock Will Bounce Back From Earnings Slump. Here’s Why.

Published

on

Vita Coco Stock Will Bounce Back From Earnings Slump. Here’s Why.

Vita Coco Stock Will Bounce Back From Earnings Slump. Here’s Why.

Continue Reading

Business

Alamos Gold Inc. 2025 Q4 – Results – Earnings Call Presentation (TSX:AGI:CA) 2026-02-20

Published

on

OneWater Marine Inc. (ONEW) Q1 2026 Earnings Call Transcript

Q4: 2026-02-18 Earnings Summary

EPS of $0.74 beats by $0.05

 | Revenue of $788.06M (47.40% Y/Y) misses by $20.87M

This article was written by

Seeking Alpha’s transcripts team is responsible for the development of all of our transcript-related projects. We currently publish thousands of quarterly earnings calls per quarter on our site and are continuing to grow and expand our coverage. The purpose of this profile is to allow us to share with our readers new transcript-related developments. Thanks, SA Transcripts Team

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business

Japan stocks lower at close of trade; Nikkei 225 down 1.07%

Published

on


Japan stocks lower at close of trade; Nikkei 225 down 1.07%

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025