Join Mikko Hyppönen and security leaders from the NFL, CHANEL, and Atlassian for a two-hour digital summit on what AI-speed attacks change, what defenders should stop doing, and how to validate, decide, fix, and re-validate at machine speed.
Tech
Twin tech founders who left Seattle for Alaska bet on an AI agent named ‘Walter’ to cover local news

Several years after leaving Seattle’s startup scene to build a “tech outpost” in the Alaskan wilderness, serial entrepreneurs and twin brothers Lee and Lucas Brown have set their sights on a new frontier: replacing the traditional newsroom with artificial intelligence.
The duo made their mark in Seattle with Tune, a marketing technology and mobile attribution platform originally founded in 2009 as HasOffers. In 2017, they migrated north to Valdez, Alaska, establishing “Geeks in the Woods” — a remote startup factory and technology outpost designed to incubate new digital ventures away from traditional tech centers.
Now they’re part of the leadership team behind Alaska News, a new platform that relies on AI agents — including a primary AI reporting persona named “Walter” — to ingest public meeting transcripts, filings, and notices to draft thousands of local news stories.
Walter — named in homage to famed television anchor Walter Cronkite — relies on AI products from multiple companies, including Anthropic, OpenAI, Google and xAI, to generate stories. The agent has written over 4,500 stories since its inception earlier this year, according to a profile and Q&A published Thursday by the Anchorage Press.
Walter works alongside human editor Cale Green, who provides oversight in a model the founders frame as a nonpartisan solution to Alaska’s dwindling local news coverage.
The founders maintain that their approach is strictly civic-minded.
@media (max-width: 600px) {
aside.callout { float:none !important; max-width:100% !important; margin-left:0 !important; margin-right:0 !important; }
aside.callout .callout-img { display:none !important; }
}
“We don’t impose judgment on the things we’re reporting,” co-founder Lee Brown told the Anchorage Press. “We try to provide both sides.”
On its about page, the site argues it can be trusted because it replaces traditional institutional authority with complete operational transparency — explicitly linking every claim to searchable primary sources, clearly labeling AI content and its level of human editing, and operating on a reader-funded model without corporate or algorithmic incentives to push rage bait.
When questioned directly about its boundaries and operational limits, Walter offered a surprisingly clear self-assessment of its place in the newsroom.
“I’m not a person, and I should not be mistaken for one. I do not make phone calls, attend meetings or interview people directly,” Walter told Anchorage Press Executive Editor Nathaniel Herz in a Discord chat. “My lane is record-based reporting: public notices, government filings, meeting materials, transcripts, prior coverage and other documents that can be checked.”
When asked if it possessed a personality, Walter insisted it was purely a utility, though it conceded that “if I have a sense of humor, it’s strictly dry, record-based, and probably unintended.”
On Friday morning, stories on the site written by Walter included a report on a Fairbanks committee considering a rezone for 51 housing units, a federal task order awarded to an Idaho firm for snow removal at the Alcan border port, and a breakdown of state federal notices clearing 46 Alaska Native ancestors for return from museums.

The Browns are no strangers to unconventional tech setups or building tools off the beaten path.
After bootstrapping HasOffers in its early years, growing Tune into an $80 million business with over 300 employees, and taking on venture funding from firms like Accel Partners, the twins deliberately stepped away from the traditional startup treadmill in late 2018.
They relocated permanently to Valdez — a town of less than 4,000 residents known more for backcountry skiing than software development — where they set up Geeks in the Woods. Framed as an incubator operating far from Seattle in “the quiet space between code and wilderness,” the project builds software and infrastructure for a world where AI agents act as “first-class participants.”
Alaska News is just one piece of that experiment; their Valdez outpost also touches patent discovery, election-integrity research, agent-focused identity infrastructure, and AI-assisted music.
The Browns are part of a five-person founding team behind Alaska News. Alongside editor-in-chief Green, the project’s masthead includes Matt Larkin, a longtime Alaska pollster and political operative, and Grant Robinson, a former television reporter who serves as a spokesperson for Alaska Gov. Mike Dunleavy.
“Lee and I love being entrepreneurs and taking things from 0-to-1, turning crazy ideas into legit business concepts that can grow and scale,” Lucas Brown told GeekWire in 2019.
Tech
Daily Deal: MOGICS Power Bagel Travel Power Strip
The MOGICS Bagel has 5 international AC sockets, dual USB ports, 3ft integrated length-adjustable power cord, and an ergonomic AC plug. Unlike ordinary power strips, the bagel design makes it easier to charge multiple devices giving ample space for each plug. It has a LED power indicator that emits brilliant blue light when power is connected. With a rolling mechanism developed by MOGICS, AC cord storage has never been so compact. The adjustable cord comes with auto-lock stoppers to keep it all neat and organized. It’s on sale for $37.
Note: The Techdirt Deals Store is powered and curated by StackSocial. A portion of all sales from Techdirt Deals helps support Techdirt. The products featured do not reflect endorsements by our editorial team.
Tech
Space hardware startup plans $125M stock offering and Nasdaq listing through shell company merger

Marysville, Wash.-based Gravitics, which is developing orbital carriers for government and commercial customers, is getting ready for a reverse takeover that could lead to a $125 million public offering.
The arrangements are being made with Non-Invasive Monitoring Systems, a Florida-based shell company, with the goal of getting Gravitics listed on the Nasdaq stock exchange.
The two ventures have been discussing the deal for months. The terms for the public offering were announced last month, and this week, a notice filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission revealed a previously unreported $17 million funding round that was completed earlier this year. The filing appears to be part of the preparations for the reverse takeover.
Similar to a SPAC merger, a reverse takeover offers a faster route for a private company to go public by acquiring a less active shell company and taking control of the combined operations. Non-Invasive Monitoring Systems is a prime example: It stopped manufacturing motorized therapeutic platforms in 2019 but retained its OTC listing. The plan envisions “uplisting” the merged company from OTC to NASDAQ.
The reverse takeover strategy has been used by several prominent companies, including Berkshire Hathaway, Burger King and Bellevue, Wash.-based T-Mobile US. Gravitics plans to follow up on the merger with an offering of 8.1 million shares priced between $14 and $17, which averages out to $125 million.
Because the offering has been registered with the SEC, the parties to the transaction are in a quiet period that restrains them from commenting on the arrangements.
Gravitics was founded in 2021 by CEO Colin Doughan, chief architect Gary Hudson and chief marketing officer Michael DeRosa. Over the past five years, it has secured some high-profile contracts for the design and manufacture of orbital carriers and space station modules.
Although Gravitics hasn’t yet put any spacecraft in orbit, several projects are underway. In 2024, the company won a $125 million contract from Axiom Space to provide a pressurized module for Axiom’s yet-to-be-launched space station. Last month, NASA said it would issue an award of up to $225,000 to support Gravitics’ work on a hangar facility for orbital cargo vehicles.
Gravitics is also receiving funding from the U.S. Space Force for multiple projects. The company said last month that it was selected by Lockheed Martin to support a “contract of national importance,” reportedly involving the development of orbital carriers for the Pentagon’s Golden Dome missile defense initiative.
Tech
Almost 86% of Japanese game developers are using AI in their workflows, up from 51% in 2025
In context: With AI coding assistants becoming an integral part of the software development process for professional programmers, many video game devs are reportedly using generative AI regularly in their workflows. A new report released at the 2026 Tokyo Game Show reveals just how widespread the practice has become.
According to a survey conducted by the Computer Entertainment Suppliers Association (CESA), there has been a massive surge in AI adoption among video game developers in Japan, with 85.8% of respondents reporting that they use generative AI as part of their game development process. While 63% of surveyed developers said they use AI tools daily, 22.8% said they use them only occasionally.
The survey results indicate that generative AI usage in the Japanese video game industry has increased by more than 70% since last year, when 51% of surveyed developers reported using AI in their workflows either regularly or occasionally.
The findings also point to a broader trend of AI adoption among software engineers across industries, reinforcing the growing belief that AI tools have become an increasingly important part of efficient app and game development.
It is worth noting that CESA has only released a preview version of the full survey, with the detailed report scheduled to be published in December. While the preview does not reveal exactly how developers are incorporating AI into their workflows, the most commonly cited benefits include “improved operational efficiency and productivity,” followed by “shorter development cycles” and “reduced development and operational costs.”
Almost all respondents denied using AI-generated output in their code, saying the tools are largely restricted to debugging, error correction, and automated testing. They added that all AI usage is “confirmed, modified, and supervised” by human developers to prevent abuse. The studios also reportedly restrict which AI tools can be used and how extensively, ensuring that humans remain responsible for creative decisions and final quality assessments.
The survey was conducted earlier this year among developers at Capcom, Sega, Level-5, Konami, Square Enix, Koei Tecmo, Sony, and other CESA member companies. In a statement, CESA Executive Director Tsutomu Masuda noted that this year’s report highlights the increasing use of generative AI in development environments but cautioned that the adoption of new technologies must not compromise intellectual property rights.
Tech
Teaching Google’s Fruit Fly Brain to Play Balatro Results in MaleCNS Beating Ante 8

Google Research and HHMI Janelia’s FlyEM team released MaleCNS v1.0 earlier this month, a complete wiring diagram of an adult male fruit fly’s brain and ventral nerve cord. More than 166,000 neurons and about 125 million synapses sit in that public map, rebuilt from electron-microscope slices of a real Drosophila with machine-learning reconstruction. Hobbyists spent the next two weeks pointing those cells at DOOM, Beat Saber, Minecraft, a Rubik’s Cube, crypto tickers, and a parallel-parking drill. Then someone pointed them at Jimbo from Balatro.
Reddit user ActualAerie1011 posted a clip of a finished run on the default Red Deck at the lowest stake. Balatro, LocalThunk’s poker roguelike from Playstack, asks a player to build poker hands, buy Jokers, manage money, and survive eight antes before the blinds outrun the score. Shops, packs, and bosses change with every seed. Clearing Ante 8 on White Stake with Red Deck is the first real finish most people chase, and that is the bar the poster set.
Sale
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Unlocked Android Smartphone, 256GB Graphite
- CREATED FOR YOUR CONTENT: Any way you turn it, the new Galaxy Z Fold8 gives you a fuller viewing experience. Designed with your content in mind, this…
- WORLD’S LIGHTEST FOLD¹: Galaxy Z Fold8 is the newest foldable phone for content on the go. Unfolded, it fits movies and books for an immersive…
- THE BRIGHTEST DISPLAY ON A GALAXY PHONE: Our brightest smartphone display² provides you with a comfortable view, whether you’re inside or outside…
ActualAerie1011 had already put in the effort to upgrade a custom seed finder. This was a tool he had built before, to see if the high-score seeds people posted were actually reachable. That tool became a teacher. Then, they let the simulated Fly play through the same seeds as the teacher. The only difference was this: instead of just looking at the end game chip total, the Fly would get rewarded or punished based on how closely the Fly’s hand plays, discards, and shop buys matched the teacher’s play throughs.

According to the poster, the reward and punishment were based on how close the Fly was to the teacher’s exact choices, rather than the raw chip amount. Millions of games were being trained for. So far, the results look promising: a 20% chance of winning at Ante 8 with a completely random seed, and that’s at the softest setting. There’s also a video flying around that demonstrates a full clear. Of course, training hasn’t ended yet, so the outcomes could change. People have been begging for a repository, especially because so many people are skeptical, yet as of September 18th, there is still none. The poster even defined it as a test to determine if the Fly can learn this card game any faster with a real connection pattern, or if it’s just a generic reinforcement learner.

When it comes to the other MaleCNS toys, they function by mapping pixels to visual neurons and keys to motor cells, and then tipping in dopamine cells once the avatar gets damage or misses a beat, but Balatro deviates from that. A run is about reading shop, building up your hand, and recognizing when to skip forward to the next pack, which is a completely different type of struggle. It’s unclear whether the 166,000 cells they’ve put up are doing anything that a smaller network couldn’t, as the code has yet to be made public. For the time being, the claim is rather straightforward: on White Stake, Red Deck, and random seeds, one out of every five Balatro runs makes it to Ante 8. That’s already better than many humans do in their first play through.
[Source]
Tech
US NAND factory could reshape storage supply for Apple
SK Hynix-owned Solidigm is considering a U.S. factory for the storage chips used in phones, computers, and data centers, a move that would reduce its dependence on China as Washington pressures foreign chipmakers to manufacture in America.
Upstate New York has emerged as the leading candidate, Reuters reported Friday, citing three people familiar with the discussions. No agreement has been reached, and the location, investment, capacity, and construction schedule remain undecided.
Solidigm said it regularly evaluates options to improve its long-term competitiveness but hasn’t chosen a course of action. SK Hynix similarly confirmed that it is reviewing options without committing to the factory.
The proposed project would be separate from SK Hynix’s discussions about producing memory chips at Intel’s planned Ohio facility.
Solidigm currently relies on one NAND production site, the Dalian facility in China. Adding a U.S. factory would reduce Solidigm’s dependence on Dalian while limiting its exposure to potential tariffs and restrictions on chipmaking equipment exports to China.
Washington and Seoul are pulling chipmakers in opposite directions
The Trump administration wants South Korean and Taiwanese chipmakers to expand production in the United States. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick has threatened chip tariffs as high as 100% on companies that don’t make sufficient American investments.
South Korea wants SK Hynix and Samsung to continue investing at home. Seoul has urged both companies to accelerate construction of a domestic semiconductor cluster that could attract hundreds of billions of dollars in spending.
South Korean President Lee Jae Myung acknowledged Friday that the U.S. and South Korean demands remain controversial. Lee said his government would protect South Korean interests while respecting decisions made by the companies.
One person familiar with Solidigm’s discussions said NAND is viewed as less strategically sensitive in South Korea than DRAM and high-bandwidth memory. NAND’s lower strategic sensitivity could make a U.S. factory more politically acceptable to Seoul than moving advanced memory production to Intel’s Ohio site.
A U.S. factory would still be more expensive to operate than one in South Korea. SK Hynix must weigh higher U.S. operating costs against tariff protection, access to American customers, and reduced reliance on Chinese manufacturing.
New York already has a growing chip industry
Upstate New York isn’t an arbitrary candidate. New York offers up to $10 billion in performance-based Green CHIPS incentives to attract semiconductor factories and suppliers.
Eligible projects must generally create at least 500 jobs and invest at least $3 billion during each 10-year project term. The available reporting doesn’t indicate that Solidigm has requested incentives or selected a specific New York site.
Micron is already developing a planned $100 billion memory-chip complex in Clay, near Syracuse. The workforce and supplier network developing around Micron could make upstate New York more attractive to another memory manufacturer.
New York also has semiconductor operations and research facilities connected to companies including GlobalFoundries, IBM, and Wolfspeed. New York promotes its workforce, research facilities, and available industrial sites as it competes for federal and private chip investment.
Solidigm’s business is focused on AI storage
The AI boom is usually discussed in terms of GPUs and high-bandwidth memory, but data centers also need persistent storage. Solidigm specializes in enterprise SSDs, including high-capacity drives intended for AI infrastructure.
A NAND factory would address a different part of the AI supply chain than SK Hynix’s existing U.S. project. SK Hynix broke ground in August on a more than $4 billion HBM packaging and testing facility in West Lafayette, Indiana.
The Indiana facility will receive wafers manufactured in South Korea and is scheduled to begin mass production during the second half of 2029. A Solidigm factory would add U.S. NAND fabrication outside China rather than perform only packaging and testing.
NAND stores data in phones, computers, and data centers, while HBM provides high-speed working memory for AI accelerators. The proposed factory’s product mix hasn’t been determined, making it too early to predict which markets or customers would receive its chips.
The report doesn’t identify Apple as a Solidigm customer or suggest that the plant would make storage for iPhones, iPads, or Macs. Any Apple connection remains indirect through the wider NAND market.
SK Hynix formed Solidigm after agreeing to acquire Intel’s NAND and SSD business for $9 billion. The first phase closed in 2021 and included Intel’s SSD operations and the Dalian factory.
Solidigm later endured years of losses during a prolonged NAND downturn. AI data-center spending has since strengthened memory demand, but construction would take years.
The factory wouldn’t provide dependable capacity as soon as construction ended. Solidigm would still need to install equipment, raise production to commercially viable yields, and qualify the factory’s output for customers.
A U.S. factory would shift Solidigm’s risks rather than eliminate them. Solidigm would gain geographic redundancy and reduce its exposure to China, but it would accept higher production costs and the execution risks of bringing a new semiconductor factory online.
Tech
Samsung Galaxy S26 FE Review
Verdict
The Galaxy S26 FE is a solid phone with a great screen, reliable performance and seven years of updates, but ageing cameras, limited storage and strong competition make it hard to recommend. With little changed from the S25 FE, it’s only worth considering with a hefty discount.
-
Good quality large display
-
Decent everyday performance
-
Solid main camera
-
Seven years of software updates
-
Basically the same as the S25 FE
-
Only 128GB storage
-
Ultra-wide and telephoto cameras are subpar
-
One UI takes a while to tame
-
Competing mid-range phones cost less
SQUIRREL_PLAYLIST_10208713
Key Features
-
Review Price:
£699
-
High-quality 6.7-inch display
The high-res 6.7-inch screen remains one of the best in the mid-range phone market.
-
Triple rear cameras
A combination of main, ultrawide and telephoto lenses on the rear.
-
Cheaper than the S26 and S26 Plus
The S26 FE offers the same flagship Galaxy S26 formula, in a cheaper package.
Introduction
The Galaxy S26 FE is Samsung’s sixth attempt at watering down its flagship S series phone into a cheaper version that offers premium features at a more reasonable price. At £699/$699, it’s the most expensive FE to date, but remains good value in the context of the prices of the S26 and S26 Plus, which start at £879 and £1,099 respectively.
The S26 FE has the same size 6.7-inch display as the Plus, so it’s a great option if you want a large, performant Samsung phone with decent cameras and lengthy software support.
Its value proposition falls down when compared to cheaper mid-range smartphones that offer similar or equivalent specs and performance, but for the most part, the S26 FE looks, feels and performs much in the same way as the pricier S26 phones – which is to say it has an iterative design and comes with cluttered software that at times verges on bloatware.
Maybe it’s because I review phones for a living, but the S26 FE is also just a tad dull, when competitors such as Nothing are charging less but launching more exciting handsets.
Design
- Glass back with aluminium sides
- IP68
- Very similar to S25 FE
The S26 FE looks at first glance like the S26 Plus thanks to their similar sizes and dimensions. The FE is pleasingly slim to hold at a svelte 7.4mm thick, but it’s a shame it has a glossy glass back. This does make it less slippery to hold than a matte finish, but it shows fingerprints, especially on the darker cobalt and blueberry colours.
I reviewed the pistachio colour, which I veered between liking and thinking it looks like gaudy 1970s ceramics. Overall though, the design is plain, with three cameras on the back in a matte finish bump, with silver aluminium side rails. Besides the addition of the bump to house the cameras, this is the same design as the S25 FE.


Unlike the Galaxy S26 and S26 Plus, the phone’s frame is not made from Samsung’s stronger Armor Aluminium, and the FE’s glass on the front and back is Gorilla Glass Victus+, not the Victus 2 found on its pricier S-series siblings.
The only other design features of note are a volume rocker on the right edge above the power button, and a USB-C port on the bottom next to the speaker grille and SIM card slot. If you asked me to draw a generic smartphone, I’d probably draw this phone. It’s not one to get if you value interesting design in your personal tech purchases.
Another couple of niche but disappointing downgrades over the S25 FE are USB 2.0 transfer speeds instead of USB 3.2. Moving files to and from the phone to a drive or computer will be slower, and it means the phone does not support wired DeX, Samsung’s desktop mode, only wireless.
The phone also loses DisplayPort video out, so you can no longer use the phone to output video to a monitor. These seem like cynical things to shave off the phone when it surely does not cost too much more to include them.
Screen
- 6.7-inch 120Hz AMOLED
- Optical fingerprint sensor
- Non-uniform bezel
While the S26 FE’s screen is the same 6.7-inch size as the display on the S26 Plus, Samsung had to cut some corners somewhere. That means the cheaper phone has a lower resolution of 2340 x 1090 and has a lower peak brightness of 1900 nits.
Though it has a 120Hz refresh rate, it does not have the LTPO technology that allows the screen to dynamically drop down to 1Hz for things such as the always-on display, meaning it’s a little less power efficient, only able to switch between 60Hz and 120Hz.


But the good news is that this is still an excellent screen, and one of the reasons to go for this phone compared to others in its price vicinity. Samsung knows how to fine-tune a display, and for my money this looks better than the £499 Nothing Phone 4a Pro and is as good as the £799 Xiaomi 17T Pro.
Apps scroll smoothly by, and video looks great thanks to support for HDR10+. The panel is only interrupted by a punch-hole selfie camera at the top, and each corner of the screen is gently curved.
One other thing that gives away the cheaper build here is the screen’s black bezels, which are not uniform the whole way round. This probably won’t bother most people, but it is noticeably thicker at the bottom than the top and sides.
The optical fingerprint sensor, another downgrade, is noticeably slower to read my thumbprint than the ultrasonic version in the pricier S26 models, but it worked reliably enough.
Cameras
- Identical cameras to the S25 FE
- Disappointing 8MP telephoto lens
- Dull colour profile for selfies
In keeping with Samsung making barely any upgrades over the S25 FE, the S26 FE has the exact same camera hardware as its predecessor: a 50MP main camera, 12MP ultra-wide and 8MP telephoto. On paper, this is also the same as 2024’s S24 FE and 2023’s S23 FE.
The main lens takes good, sharp photos in daylight. Samsung is known for its punchy, sometimes oversaturated colours in its smartphone photos, and the S26 FE generally falls in line. But in some images I found the colours washed out, which was disappointing.


Photos also fall down in low light, where the small sensor size shows its shortcomings. Focus is tough to find, and images become noisy. That said, this is a camera that will please most users who just want a reliable point-and-shoot for WhatsApp photo sharing and Instagram Stories posts.
Less fun to use are the ultra-wide and telephoto, both of which lack quality. An ultra-wide is handy to take in more of an outdoor scene, but the 12MP sensor can’t capture much detail, so shots are more demonstrative than pleasing to look back on.
The telephoto is also nothing to write home about, but photos are fine in a pinch, and I do commend Samsung for including an optical telephoto lens on its £699 phone when Apple’s £899 (thanks to a September 2026 price rise) iPhone 17 doesn’t include one. If you’re not too bothered by mobile photography, the S26 FE’s cameras are solid enough, especially given I was not overly impressed with the S26 and S26 Plus’s cameras, despite their apparently better hardware.
The 12MP selfie camera is also not much to get excited about, unable to cope with light levels and capturing mostly dull coloured images. It’ll do for well-lit selfies and for video calls though.


Samsung needs to up its game in this area, but I will admit these are not offensively bad cameras. That said, I would pick the £499 Google Pixel 10a on main camera quality over the S26 FE, even though that phone has no telephoto lens. You can also pick up the Xiaomi 17T from £649, which has much more impressive triple sensors.
Performance
- Exynos 2500
- 8GB RAM
- Can cope with most graphically intense games
One upgrade over the S25 FE is the use of Samsung’s own Exynos 2500 chipset, which is based on a more powerful 3 nanometer (nm) process than the 2400 used last year, but has less oomph than the 2nm Exynos 2600 found in the S26 and S26 Plus (for most buyers – Samsung’s flagships use the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 in the US and Korea).
I found performance on the S26 FE absolutely fine for daily use, although I do not tend to push my phones to the absolute limit. Apps loaded quickly and I could flick between them without any noticeable slowdown.


The phone comes with 8GB RAM across the board, and the £699/$699 base model I tested has 128GB storage. That’s not a lot, and prices creep up if you want 256GB or 512GB. There’s no expandable storage or headphone jack, alas, but Samsung does still include dual physical nano SIM card slots, and the phone is also eSIM compatible.
Graphically intense games such as Asphalt 8 and even Call of Duty: Mobile run well. Casual and mid-level interest mobile gamers will be suited fine, but this is not the handset to get if you want to play Genshin Impact with full settings activated. For that, Samsung buyers will want to bump up to a regular S26 for the more capable hardware.
Software & AI
- One UI 9 is competent but cluttered
- AI stays out of your way if you want it to
- Seven years of software updates is excellent
Samsung’s One UI Android software is much better than it was a decade ago or so when it was known as TouchWiz, but in its evolution through the years it has become a bit of an overstuffed beast. Yes, Samsung phones are customisable and can do a lot – part of the appeal of Android – but I find One UI 9 overstuffed with options.
It took me a solid couple of days to wrestle the software to my liking. Samsung by default only displays notification icons on the lock screen rather than full previews with text. This setting to change is surprisingly difficult to find, and it’s possible new owners wouldn’t realise they could even change it.
Samsung Keyboard is also the keyboard out of the box on this phone, and it is far inferior to Google’s Gboard. Its autocorrect is worse, and suggestions aren’t as useful. I switched to Gboard quite fast despite trying to give Samsung’s version a good go.
Samsung has at least finally stopped shipping its phones with Samsung Messages, so Google Messages is the texting app here, but you still get a Gallery app that sits alongside Google Photos, and Samsung Browser as well as Google Chrome. There’s other cruft preinstalled like Samsung’s Global Goals app, as well as Facebook, Instagram, TikTok and Perplexity. These are popular apps, but it irks me that they are there when you set the phone up.


More annoying is Samsung’s AI, even though it can be tamed. The Now brief widget on the home screen (which can be removed) is very useless. It’s meant to be a personalised feed of your day, but it mostly just shows the weather, your calendar and, if you let it, recommended YouTube videos and Netflix shows. Hardly AI.
Google Gemini is the main assistant here, alongside a smattering of Bixby, Samsung’s own fading voice assistant brand. The most useful touch is being able to type things like “bigger font” in the search bar in the settings app and have the ‘Font size’ setting come up in results. Typing natural language to search for settings is clever, and works well here.
I personally do not want to use Galaxy AI to help draft my emails, but I do like that it can transcribe recordings from the native recorder app. Samsung also offers AI like Photo Assist to edit images, but again, you can also do this in Google Photos. The doubling up of AI tools across Samsung and Google apps goes some way to having this phone feel cluttered, along with the splitting of the notification shade and control centre to be more like iOS – though this is a setting you can change.
I prefer Google’s cleaner version of Android, though once you’ve chipped away at the initial annoyances, One UI is stable and reliable. Best of all, the S26 FE will get seven years of software updates, keeping buyers up to speed until 2033. That’s as good as flagship Samsung and Google phones get, and is a big plus point when compared to phones like the Xiaomi 17T Pro that beat the S26 FE on hardware, but will only get five Android version updates.
Battery life
- Can stretch into a second day with minimal use
- A fair bit of standby drain
- Can fully charge in 75 minutes
The aforementioned Xiaomi 17T series was one of the first to use newer, more energy-dense silicon-carbon batteries that offer longer battery life, but the S26 FE has a traditional lithium-ion cell. At 4,900mAh, it is sizable, but it only results in one full day of battery life in my testing.
It can stretch into a second day with moderate use – with lower power mode employed – but this is not the phone to get if you value longevity. It never lasted me a full two days. I also found there was a steady trickle of battery drain when not in use, which is disappointing.
You do get relatively fast 45W wired charging and 15W wireless, but no charger in the box.
Using a Samsung 45W charger I already had, I charged the phone from 1% to full in 75 minutes, and it reached 50% in 25 minutes. Although pricier phones can charge much faster if you shop around, this is more than acceptable if you have the right charger for the job.
SQUIRREL_PLAYLIST_10208713
Should you buy it?
You want a large-screen Samsung phone but don’t want to spend a lot
At £699/$699, the S26 FE brings an almost-flagship feel.
The S26 FE’s triple lenses suggest versatility, but amount to middle-of-the-road results.
Final Thoughts
The Samsung Galaxy S26 FE is a solid phone in a vacuum. It’s cheaper than the S26 and S26 Plus but maintains those phones’ design traits, and has its own good quality screen, more than adequate daily performance, and the same seven years of software updates.
But its cameras are very long in the tooth, it can’t play top-tier games, you only get 128GB of storage, and when you take into account cheaper options such as the Google Pixel 10a, which has superior cameras, or the Nothing Phone 4a Pro, which has a much more interesting design and cleaner software, the S26 FE looks less appealing.
It’s also practically the same design and specs as the S25 FE, aside from the processor upgrade. It means it’s a good phone that you probably shouldn’t buy unless it’s on sale, or if you can find a particularly good contract deal.
How We Test
We test every mobile phone we review thoroughly. We use industry-standard tests to compare features properly and we use the phone as our main device over the review period. We’ll always tell you what we find and we never, ever, accept money to review a product.
- Used as main phone for over a week
- Thorough camera testing in a variety of conditions
- Tested and benchmarked using respected industry tests and real-world data
FAQs
The Galaxy S26 FE is a solid all-rounder, but its ageing cameras, limited storage and strong competition mean it’s best bought on sale or with a good contract deal.
Very little has changed beyond the processor upgrade, with the Galaxy S26 FE offering practically the same design and specifications as its predecessor.
Test Data
| Samsung Galaxy S26 FE | |
|---|---|
| Geekbench 6 single core | 1960 |
| Geekbench 6 multi core | 5768 |
| Geekbench 6 GPU | 18361 |
| Geekbench 7 single core | 2013 |
| Geekbench 7 multi core | 7537 |
| Geekbench 7 GPU | 7278 |
| 3DMark Solar Bay | 42.2 fps |
| AI performance | 4089 |
| Time from 0-100% charge | 75 min |
| Time from 0-50% charge | 25 Min |
| 30-min recharge (no charger included) | 59 % |
| 15-min recharge (no charger included) | 29 % |
| 3D Mark – Wild Life | 3767 |
| 3D Mark – Wild Life Stress Test | 71.4 % |
Full Specs
| Samsung Galaxy S26 FE Review | |
|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Samsung |
| Screen Size | 6.7 inches |
| Storage Capacity | 128GB, 256GB, 512GB |
| Rear Camera | 50MP + 12MP + 8MP |
| Front Camera | 12MP |
| Video Recording | Yes |
| IP rating | IP68 |
| Battery | 4900 mAh |
| Wireless charging | Yes |
| Fast Charging | Yes |
| Size (Dimensions) | 76.9 x 7.4 x 161.6 MM |
| Weight | 193 G |
| Operating System | One UI 9 (Android 17) |
| Release Date | 2026 |
| First Reviewed Date | 17/09/2026 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 |
| HDR | Yes |
| Refresh Rate | 120 Hz |
| Ports | USB-C port |
| Chipset | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
| RAM | 8GB |
| Colours | Blueberry, Graphite, Pistachio |
| Stated Power | 45 W |
| UK RRP | £699 |
| USA RRP | $699 |
Tech
Primebook 3 Max arrives with MediaTek AI chip and Built-In Microsoft Office alternative
After the success of the Primebook 2 Pro, the company has unveiled its third-generation laptop lineup, led by the new Primebook 3 Max, launching around October 1. The biggest upgrades include a new MediaTek Genio 720 processor with an integrated AI NPU, faster LPDDR5 memory, a metallic design, and a significantly expanded software experience through PrimeOS. Primebook has also confirmed that a Primebook 3 Pro model will join the lineup later.
Primebook 3 Max Gets Upgraded Internals
The biggest hardware change in the Primebook 3 Max is the move to the MediaTek Genio 720 octa-core processor. It features two Cortex-A78 performance cores clocked at 2.6GHz alongside six Cortex-A55 efficiency cores, paired with a Mali-G57 MC2 GPU. More importantly, the chipset includes an integrated Neural Processing Unit (NPU) that enables AI workloads to run directly on the device instead of relying entirely on cloud processing.
Primebook says the new platform delivers up to 40% better performance than the previous generation. The processor is paired with 8GB LPDDR5 RAM, replacing the earlier model’s LPDDR4X memory, while storage starts at 128GB UFS and can be expanded up to 1TB via external storage. The laptop also packs a 60.3Wh battery with support for 36W USB-C fast charging, and the company claims up to 12–14 hours of battery life depending on the model.
The Primebook 3 Max features a 15.6-inch Full HD IPS anti-glare display with a matte finish, while the upcoming Pro variant will also be available in a 14.1-inch configuration. Connectivity has also been upgraded to Wi-Fi 6 and Bluetooth 5.3, along with a full-function USB 3.2 Type-C port that supports charging, display output, OTG, and accessories. Additional ports include USB-A 3.2, USB-A 2.0, another USB-C 2.0 port, a microSD card slot, and a 3.5mm headphone jack. For online classes and meetings, the laptop includes a 5MP webcam that can record 1440p video at 30fps.
Microsoft Office Alternatives & Linux Support

One notable addition is PrimeOffice, Primebook’s productivity suite designed specifically for PrimeOS. Because Microsoft Office has limited functionality on Android-based platforms, Primebook developed its own offline-first alternative: PrimeDocs, PrimeSheets, and PrimePresent. The company claims the suite offers more than 90% of the functionality most users need for documents, spreadsheets, and presentations. Rather than recreating the complexity of traditional desktop office software, PrimeOffice focuses on a cleaner interface, keeping frequently used tools easily accessible.
Beyond Android applications, PrimeOS is expanding its software ecosystem by adding native Linux application support. Because PrimeOS is built on the Linux kernel, users can access a Linux terminal and run several popular desktop development tools without additional virtualization. Supported applications include Visual Studio Code, GIMP, LibreOffice, Firefox, Arduino IDE, DBeaver CE, TablePlus, and Postman. This makes the Primebook 3 Max considerably more appealing to engineering students, aspiring developers, and users who regularly work with coding tools or command-line workflows.
Primebook has confirmed that the Primebook 3 Max will start at ₹35,990 and will be available through Amazon, Flipkart, Primebook’s official website, and selected offline retailers.
Tech
Secure enterprise sharing with access reviews for Microsoft 365
Collaboration suites like M365 offer unparalleled convenience. Millions of teams rely on them to quickly share documents with coworkers, clients and business partners. Yet when sharing is this easy, data security becomes a lot harder.
Cloud sharing is so integral to the modern workplace that it’s difficult to imagine how offices ever got by without it. Dropping files in one-on-one chats. Spreadsheets that live in Teams channels so everyone can see the latest figures. Throwing project folders on SharePoint and sending out invite links.
Yet for all the ways that cloud sharing has revolutionized office life, remote work and long-distance collaboration, there is a downside.
With the usage of cloud platforms exploding over recent years, visibility into sharing is falling further and further behind. Many organizations no longer have any idea who their users are sharing potentially sensitive information with.
Sharing moves fast. How security can keep up
Unmanaged cloud sharing is a shockingly common problem in enterprise environments. Anywhere organizations use Microsoft 365 to share access, security teams struggle to identify and rein in problematic cloud access.
In a survey by Wire, 61% of security leads reported that access to shared files often remains active longer than intended. Over a third acknowledge difficulties in even identifying who has access to sensitive shared files.
One factor that makes cloud sharing difficult to evaluate from a security perspective is how context-driven the use of sharing features is. Employees share files with a specific purpose in mind, whether it’s to coordinate with a coworker or get approval from a client on a design mockup.
The problem is that shared access often outlives or outgrows its original purpose: A freelancer could be taken off a project, but never removed from the project folder in SharePoint. Members may invite new users into a Teams channel, forgetting that they will get access to every file hosted within it.
The highly contextual nature of cloud sharing means the only way to know for certain whether shared access is still needed is to ask the person who originally provided it. Access reviews are an essential safeguard, and looping file or channel owners into the review process leads to faster and more accurate audits.
The challenge is in how to implement this process with the available tools of the platform.
The problem with built-in governance tools
The lack of control over shared data presents a growing and often underappreciated security risk in enterprise environments. At the same time, you can hardly blame teams for making full use of sharing features, the central pillar that cloud suites are built around. The problem of unmanaged cloud sharing is not so much about user behavior as it is insufficient governance features built into Microsoft 365.
Microsoft 365 provides two reporting options that offer visibility into shared data, but both come with major limitations.
You can generate a global report on sharing links using SharePoint Advanced Management, but this only tells you which sites had the most new links created in the last 28 days. By itself, that figure does not give you enough context to draw any useful conclusions. A high number of new links could point to misuse, or it could simply be due to a project with outside involvement, such as onboarding a new supplier.
Similarly, you can create site-level sharing reports to get a CSV table showing every shared file within a site and everyone who has access to it. However, running this report across every SharePoint and OneDrive in your organization is incredibly time-consuming. So is manually sifting through these files to identify problematic sharing.
Ultimately, both reporting options require you to do most of the legwork, whether it’s piecing together site-level reports into a cohesive whole or investigating the spike in sharing links you’ve seen in a global activity report.
What Microsoft 365 is missing is a centralized dashboard for access governance that gives you the full picture without all this added effort – allowing you to zoom in or out on the fly. This is where dedicated Identity & Access Governance solutions like tenfold bridge the visibility gap left by native reporting tools.
Automate on- and offboarding, streamline access reviews and stay compliant – without complexity or custom scripting.
With a suite of ready-to-use plugins, tenfold provides seamless integration for Microsoft Cloud and on-prem environments.
tenfold: Full visibility and central governance for shared files
As part of its deep integration with the Microsoft cloud and on-prem ecosystem, tenfold offers purpose-built reporting tools that provide full visibility into shared files across Teams, OneDrive and SharePoint. Two standout features put tenfold’s shared content governance ahead of other IGA platforms:
- A central breakdown of all shared content that gives you both high-level insights and object-level details in one place. Filter by app, user, site or more to quickly identify issues. Notable details, such as files being shared outside their Team or channel, are marked with icons to clearly distinguish potential issues.
- A streamlined access review process for shared content, prompting data owners to check and confirm who has access to files they shared. Each reviewer receives a personalized review dashboard of shared items and who currently has access to them. This lets reviewers quickly confirm or revoke access, making it easy to delegate the review process even to users in non-IT roles.
With in-depth visibility into cloud sharing and an effective review process to stop shared access from outliving its intended purpose, tenfold allows you to make full use of cloud collaboration features without putting your data at risk.
Regain control of shared files with the leading no-code IGA solution. Book a personal demo with our team to learn more.
Sponsored and written by tenfold Software.
Tech
Gyazo server flaw exploited to steal 23.6 million user records
The Gyazo image-sharing platform has confirmed it suffered a data breach after hackers exploited a server vulnerability that allowed them to steal 23.6 million user records.
Gyazo is a cloud-based screenshot and screen-recording tool operated by Helpfeel that automatically uploads user screen captures to the cloud and gives them a shareable link to share on chats, forums, social media, etc.
It’s especially popular in gaming communities and claims 23 million users worldwide, who have submitted 3.1 billion media items.
According to an announcement by the company, the incident occurred on September 11, 2026, allowing attackers to access its database and obtain approximately 23.62 million user records.
The company has now taken the platform offline while it conducts maintenance.
“Currently, the Gyazo service is temporarily suspended for maintenance as a preventive measure. We sincerely apologize for any inconvenience caused. Please wait a little longer until recovery,” reads a post on X.
The company detected the suspicious activity on September 12 and fixed a vulnerability the attackers used to breach the platform, but by then, the data had already been stolen.
“Our subsequent investigation confirmed that the third party had accessed Gyazo’s database and that user information and metadata associated with uploaded images had been disclosed without authorization,” confirmed Gyazo in a statement published earlier this week.
Based on Gyazo’s investigation, the data that has been exposed varies per user and may include one or more of the following:
- Names/nicknames
- Email addresses
- Password hashes
- User and device IDs
- Login session IDs
- X integration tokens
- Google SSO email addresses
- Profile details
- Subscription information
- Billing status
- Usage statistics
The exposed dataset includes anonymous account records, though Gyazo did not share what percentage those represent.
The platform also stated that the incident exposed 490 million image metadata records, most associated with images uploaded to the service before January 2019.
These metadata include image IDs used to construct image URLs, upload IP addresses, User-Agent strings, EXIF location data, OCR-extracted text, image titles, source URLs, and hashed passphrases for private images.
Helpfeel notes that image IDs can potentially be used to access the corresponding content, which is why the company has temporarily disabled access to files whose records were exposed.
Additionally, it stated that the hackers also obtained a list identifying private images, and the company cannot rule out that some were viewed.
The firm said its investigation has not found signs of data being deleted due to this incident.
The company also found no evidence that its other Helpfeel and Cosense services had data stolen.
The firm is notifying affected users directly as they conduct an investigation with external experts, and have contacted the authorities.
All Gyazo users are advised to change their passwords on the service and other platforms where they use the same credentials, and remain alert for suspicious communications.
Tech
Revolut plans a dual London and Nasdaq listing, Storonsky tells Les Echos
“In reality, we are currently planning a dual listing, on the London Stock Exchange and the Nasdaq,” Nik Storonsky told Les Echos.
The Revolut founder was in Paris on Monday. Gabriel Nédélec and Ingrid Feuerstein interviewed him for the French paper, which published on Thursday.
It is the first time he has pointed to a London listing. Revolut was valued at $115bn in a share sale in July, and a float at that level would make it one of Britain’s largest listed companies.
He spent two years saying the opposite
Storonsky has been dismissive of the London market for years. In 2024 he said it could not compete with the United States.
His objection was specific. Britain charges 0.5% stamp duty on share purchases, and he argued that made a London listing uneconomic.
“The UK is less liquid so it’s much worse compared to the US plus it’s much more expensive because you pay stamp duty,” he said at the time. He called listing in Britain “just not rational”.
The Telegraph reports that the stamp duty is still in place. What has changed is the size of the company and the state of the market he was dismissing.
London has lost more than it has won
The London Stock Exchange has been through a long drought of new listings. Companies have stayed private or gone public elsewhere.
Wise is the case that stings most. The money transfer firm left London for Nasdaq, moving its primary listing to New York this year.
AstraZeneca has been building up its New York presence while keeping its FTSE 100 place. A partial Revolut listing would be the first significant win London has had in a while.
Dual listings are also uncommon. The companies that run them tend to be among the largest and most heavily traded.
The interview was mostly about Europe
Storonsky was in Paris for a reason, and it was not the stock market. Revolut has just won a French banking licence, and France is meant to become the base for its European expansion.
The company counts 70 million customers worldwide. Just over 30 million of them are in Europe.
That French banking licence is not the full one yet. Les Echos reports that European authorities have set conditions before Revolut can offer mortgage lending.
Last week it added a sixth banking licence, in Colombia. It also received a full UK banking licence in March, having applied in 2021.
Why he still prefers New York
Storonsky was blunt about the arithmetic. The American market is simply bigger.
“We have the choice between selling in a small market with few buyers, or in a gigantic market with a huge number of buyers who will compete fiercely for our shares,” he told Les Echos. “Therefore, yes, we prefer the United States.”
He also made a retail argument. A strong consumer brand in the United States means customers buy into the offering themselves, which he said lifts the market capitalisation.
The venue he named in New York was the Nasdaq. That is the same exchange Wise moved to.
Nobody has set a date
Storonsky said earlier this year that a listing would not happen before 2028. In April he put it at roughly two years away and made it conditional on the market.
A person close to Revolut told The Telegraph that a float would be subject to market conditions. Nothing said this week changes that.
Revolut reached its $115bn valuation in a secondary share sale in July, up from $75bn in November 2025. It is the most highly valued fintech in Europe.
His own stake has been part of the preparation. In August the company moved to let him borrow against his own shares, up to $250mn.
Revolut was founded in London in 2013 and works out of Canary Wharf. Storonsky has called British regulators bureaucratic and said it is hard to do business in the UK.
-
Tech5 days agoThe Latest Weird Thing to Play Doom Is the Mapped-Out Brain of a Fruit Fly
-
Crypto World4 days agoKraken Lets xStocks Holders Earn Yield Through DeFi
-
Entertainment7 days agoNews Specials, Movies, Shows, More
-
Crypto World2 days agoUS Charges Robinhood Engineers Over Crypto Listing Trades
-
Crypto World6 days agoCan AI Build a Startup in 72 Hours? Elon Musk's Team Will Livestream the Test
-
Crypto World4 days agoElon Musk Drops a Bombshell: Grok 5 Could Be the AGI Breakthrough
-
Crypto World3 days agoWhat Is the Status of the U.S.-Iran Peace Talks? Here's What Both Sides Are Saying
-
Business6 days agoRivals Sam Altman and Elon Musk Rally Behind Dario Amodei’s Call for a Slowdown in AI Development
-
Crypto World7 days agoRobinhood Chain Never Stopped But its Blobs Did Stop Reaching Ethereum For 14 Minutes
-
NewsBeat4 days ago‘Sick conspiracy’: Trump says only guardrails AI needs is ‘a strong and smart (High IQ!) president’ in all-caps rant
-
Crypto World5 days agoNew Tesla Roadster Uses SpaceX Tech. Will It Impact the Stock Price?
-
Crypto World4 days agoNVIDIA Analysis: Attempted Rising Wedge Breakout Amid Pressure on the AI Sector
-
Entertainment7 days agoNew Horror Movie Officially Earns a Rare Stephen King Recommendation
-
Business6 days agoMarvell: Most Potent Setup Of The AI Factory Decade
-
Crypto World4 days agoRevolut Attackers Warn of Ongoing Daily Customer Data Leaks
-
Crypto World4 days agoDOJ Seeks to Seize $61M in Iran Oil Funds From Binance Accounts It Vouched For
-
Crypto World7 days agoBitcoin ETFs lose $462.7M as Ethereum funds gain $196.9M
-
Crypto World5 days ago3 Token Unlocks to Watch in the Third Week of September 2026
-
Crypto World4 days ago
Can Circle’s Arc Repeat Robinhood Chain’s Meme Coin Boom?
-
Business4 days ago
SK Hynix ADRs Fall More Than 6% as Memory Rally Breaks on Fears of Slower AI Spending






You must be logged in to post a comment Login