Connect with us

NewsBeat

He had an obvious tattoo, a withered calf from his Army days – and blue eyes, not brown. The clues that Nicholas Brandram’s family say prove the soldier-turned-banker found dead this week was NOT the ‘Putney Pusher’

Published

on

Nicholas Brandram at City of London Magistrates’ Court in October 2013, where he pleaded guilty to driving without due care and attention and failing to stop following an accident, after knocking a female cyclist off her bike while riding his Harley-Davidson past Hyde Park Corner

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

NewsBeat

The Original Meaning Of The Word Quick

Published

on

The Original Meaning Of The Word Quick

“Quick” is a word people say all the time as a synonym for fast. But most probably don’t realise that the word used to mean something very different.

Like “nice” and “awful” (which used to mean “ignorant” and “worthy of awe”, respectively), the word quick has travelled some distance from its original meaning. But it does manage to hold onto a little bit of the old and new at the same time.

“Quick originally meant alive, not fast,” Sophie Vignoles, a linguist and head of learning content at the language learning app Babbel, told HuffPost.

“It comes from the Old English ‘cwic.’ That older meaning survives in the phrase ‘the quick and the dead,’ which means ‘the living and the dead.’”

Advertisement

Indeed, earlier translations of the Bible and the Nicene Creed include “the quick,” and even some versions of the creed used to this day include the line “he shall come again with glory to judge both the quick and the dead.” There are also multiple Westerns with the title “The Quick and the Dead,” drawing from those Christian origins.

Farm animals also used to be called “quickstock” before “livestock” took over.

So how did “quick” evolve from “alive” to “fast”?

“The shift toward speed follows a simple logic,” Vignoles said. “Living things move, and dead things do not, so a word meaning alive naturally came to describe liveliness and motion. By the medieval period, quick was already being used for fast movement, and that became its dominant sense in everyday English.”

Advertisement

In many ways, it feels like a clean semantic chain from alive to animated to moving to fast. But what makes quick particularly interesting is how many traces of its original meaning are still hiding in plain sight. Take, for example, the words “quicksand” and “quicksilver” and the term “quickening” in pregnancy.

“Quicksand is sand that behaves as if it has a life of its own, shifting and pulling things under,” Vignoles said. “Quicksilver was the old name for mercury, called that because its constant, restless movement made it appear alive. Quickening in pregnancy refers to the first moment a woman feels the baby move, historically understood as the point at which the baby became alive. Each one is a small fossil of the word’s original meaning, preserved inside modern English.”

Matt Mawson via Getty Images

The original meaning of “quick” makes much more sense in the context of the word “quicksand,” since quicksand isn’t actually fast at all.

Those terms preserve the older sense of alive, rather than fast. Quicksand is basically “living sand” – which makes more sense than “fast sand,” given it’s actually a rather slow-moving phenomenon (unlike depictions in movies). And quicksilver is “living silver.” In fact, Pliny the Elder described the substance of mercury as “argentum vivum,” which literally means “living silver” or “quicksilver” in the earlier English translation.

Advertisement

“Cut to the quick” is another surviving phrase linked to that earlier meaning of quick. The phrase refers to the idea of piercing straight to the heart of something or causing someone hurt on a very deep level. In other words, to cut to the quick can mean to cut to the very core of what makes you a living being.

In the context of this phrase, quick can also refer to the sensitive, living flesh beneath your fingernails, which can hurt intensely if you cut your nails deep. In this sense, it might be that you’re cutting into tender skin that’s alive versus a fingernail, which is made up of dead cells.

For Vignoles, the story of “quick” illustrates something broader about how languages carry their histories.

“It shows that old meanings rarely disappear. They survive in fixed phrases long after the main sense of a word has moved on,” she said, pointing to Babbel’s research on the way American English has evolved in honor of the United States’ 250th anniversary this year.

Advertisement

The evolution also points to how deep some of these connections can run, she added.

“The root behind quick is the same one that produced Latin words like vivid and revive, and it is also related to the root behind the Hindi word jeevan, meaning ‘life,’” Vignoles said. “Babbel’s research found Hindi has only entered the American dictionary in the past two decades, through words like yoga and karma, but the deeper connection between English and Hindi at the root level goes back much further than that.”

She believes the word quick is a clear case of a word maintaining its original and modern meaning side by side in everyday language.

“The same root shows up even further afield,” Vignoles said. “Russian zhivoy, meaning alive or lively, comes from the same ancient source, and so does the Greek bios, the root behind words like biology and biography. It is a reminder that a single ancient idea, the idea of being alive, has quietly seeded vocabulary across English, Hindi, Russian and Greek alike, even though most speakers of those languages would never guess the words are related.”

Advertisement

Now perhaps next time you ask someone to be quick with something, you’ll remember that you are invoking a word whose original meaning was a reminder to all that we are alive.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Decades of male-focused medical research could bias healthcare AI

Published

on

Decades of male-focused medical research could bias healthcare AI

Many people will learn CPR using a flat-chested manikin. A 2024 study of 20 models of CPR manikins sold worldwide found that three quarters were described as male or had no sex specified. Of the 20, only one offered a breast overlay.

The manikins reflect a wider tendency in medical teaching and research to treat the male body as standard. The terms “male and female” and “men and women” in this article reflect the sources, which often fail to distinguish sex from gender or say whether gender-diverse people were included.

The lack of female representation can have consequences. In a US study of 19,331 out-of-hospital cardiac arrests, 39% of women who collapsed in public received bystander CPR, compared with 45% of men.

For CPR, even a short delay can affect survival. Another US study found that people who received bystander CPR four to five minutes after a witnessed cardiac arrest had 27% lower odds of surviving to hospital discharge than those who received it within one minute. In England, fewer than one in 12 patients for whom ambulance services attempted resuscitation survived 30 days, according to figures reported in 2024.

Advertisement

If bystanders hesitate to perform CPR on women because of the presence of breasts, training on more representative manikins could help. Historical gaps in representation now have another consequence. Healthcare increasingly uses artificial intelligence trained on medical records and research data produced when male bodies were often treated as the norm.

When old data trains new systems

Healthcare AI learns associations from health data. But medical records reflect clinical decisions as well as biology. If women and men with similar symptoms have historically been assessed differently, an algorithm may learn that pattern without knowing why it exists.

For example, an experimental study of medical students and residents found that when coronary heart disease symptoms were presented alongside psychological stress, women received fewer coronary heart disease diagnoses and cardiology referrals than men, and their symptoms were more likely to be interpreted as psychogenic. An AI system trained on records shaped by such decisions could treat that pattern as though it reflected disease itself.

Reviews of AI in medicine warn that unbalanced datasets can produce uneven performance. It can also be difficult to assess performance: a 2024 review of 692 AI-enabled medical devices approved by the US Food and Drug Administration found that demographic information and details of performance studies were often missing from public documents.

Advertisement

Understanding that risk requires looking at how the medical evidence AI may draw on was created.

How men became the medical default

Females are consistently underrepresented in medical studies. Hormonal changes across the menstrual cycle have historically been viewed as a source of unwanted variation. After the thalidomide tragedy of the late 1950s and early 1960s, the US Food and Drug Administration in 1977 recommended excluding women who could become pregnant from early drug trials. The policy was reversed in 1993 amid concern that it was limiting knowledge about how medicines affected women.

Women of childbearing potential were routinely excluded from industry-sponsored trials. Male animals have also been favoured in laboratory research, despite evidence that females are no more biologically variable, and many studies fail to report the sex of cells used in experiments.

These gaps can affect treatment. Women clear the sleeping drug zolpidem more slowly than men, and in 2013 regulators recommended halving the starting dose for women. A 2020 analysis found that women experienced adverse drug reactions nearly twice as often as men, with differences in how drugs move through the body explaining many of them.

Advertisement

Representation has improved. The 2016 Sex and Gender Equity in Research (SAGER) guidelines encourage researchers to consider and report sex and gender. But equal participation does not guarantee equal understanding. A 2026 review of 574 papers found that 61% included both sexes, yet only 44% of those analysed results by sex.

Biological sex and gender can both affect health, and separating their effects is difficult. Sex-related biology may influence drug metabolism, while gendered experiences may affect access to healthcare and how symptoms are interpreted. Yet many health databases collapse both into one binary category, limiting what researchers can conclude.

Biology or bias?

Heart-attack symptoms show why precision is needed. An analysis of more than one million people with acute coronary syndromes found that 74% of women and 79% of men experienced chest pain, but women had higher odds of reporting other symptoms including neck or jaw pain, fatigue and shortness of breath.




À lire aussi :
Women are at a higher risk of dying from heart disease − in part because doctors don’t take major sex and gender differences into account

Advertisement

Stroke care presents a similar problem. An Australian study of more than 202,000 people admitted with stroke found that among those under 70 arriving by ambulance, women were less likely than men to be assessed as having a stroke by paramedics and less likely to be managed under the pre-hospital stroke protocol.

Finding a difference is only the starting point. A study of 6.9 million people in Denmark found that women were older at their first hospital diagnosis for most conditions examined. That does not necessarily mean doctors took longer to diagnose them: disease onset and use of healthcare may also vary.

Medical research is becoming more representative, but much of today’s evidence was collected when male bodies were more often treated as standard. Careful design could help AI identify patterns that older research missed. As tomorrow’s healthcare is built from yesterday’s records, researchers must ask whether an apparent difference reflects biology or the way patients encountered healthcare. Otherwise old assumptions could become embedded in new technology.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

My Mom Pressured Me To Have Kids, But I Had A Secret

Published

on

My Mom Pressured Me To Have Kids, But I Had A Secret

As a little girl, my favourite doll was Betsy Wetsy, a 1950’s “drink and wet” toy that resembled an infant. I fed her water through a baby bottle, and moments later, she wet her diaper, the water dripping down her plastic, chubby legs.

“Oops! She has to be changed,” I shouted to my mother.

Taking care of Betsy made me feel like a mom, and like so many girls on my Brooklyn block, I dreamed of becoming one in the future. But that was not meant to be.

I was married to Steve, the love of my life, for 45 years, but we did not have children.

Advertisement

My mother pressured me to have a baby throughout my life. “You’re selfish,” she said. “You care more about your lifestyle and work than you do about having children.”

My cousin Susan, a Southern Baptist and mother of two, came at me from a different angle. “It’s against the Lord’s will. You must have a child,“ she said.

My mother’s second husband asked, “Why did you ever get married if you had no intention of having children?”

When I was nearing the end of my childbearing years, my mother told me, “When you’re older, you’ll be sorry, just like my Aunt Laura. She’s alone. I don’t want that to happen to you.”

Advertisement

Steve and I had discussed having a child. In fact, we almost had one. Three months after our wedding, I found out I was pregnant. It was unplanned, and we decided it was not the right time to be parents.

Our Greenwich Village apartment was in a tenement, up four flights with no elevator. I had just started a master’s degree program, and my husband hated his new teaching job. “It’s just too soon for us now,” he said.

The author and Steve getting married in West Nyack, New York, in 1976.

Abortions had recently become legal in New York. The decision seemed easy. I made a phone call to Planned Parenthood, secured an office visit and paid $175 in cash.

“It’s the right thing to do,” we told each other. “We’ll have other opportunities.”

Advertisement

There were no other opportunities.

A year after the abortion, my gynaecologist discovered huge fibroids were pressing against my uterus. “Your uterus is heart-shaped,” he said. “You’ll have problems carrying a fetus to full term and will probably have a miscarriage.”

Some couples might be devastated by the news, but Steve and I were ambivalent. He always said, “I don’t have a burning desire.”

Did I have a burning desire? Not then.

Advertisement

When I turned 37 in 1985, and Steve was 36, my childbearing clock began ticking loudly. I suddenly, desperately wanted a child. Our jobs were secure, and we were happy together. If not now, then when? I wondered. However, the universe had other ideas.

The author and Steve in St. Martin in 2004.
The author and Steve in St. Martin in 2004.

That year, AIDS was beginning to pop up in national headlines more and more frequently. No one in our circle knew much about it or how it was contracted, but as the months went by, we became more concerned.

“Do you get it from having sex?” I asked my doctor. It seemed like there were no definitive answers. Still, no matter how someone became sick with the disease, the telltale signs were visible at some point.

Soon, the West Village was filled with skeletons slowly making their way down the cozy streets. People with AIDS were grappling not only with the deadly disease, but also a huge stigma. There was very little information available at that time and no medications; a blood test to detect HIV had just become available.

An internist we knew was one of the first doctors to get access to the screening. Since Steve and I had both had other partners before and occasionally during our marriage, we decided to be tested before trying to have a child.

Advertisement

We took the test in 1986. I tested negative. Steve didn’t. From that moment on, he was labeled HIV+, a status he lived with for the rest of his life. It’s impossible to know when he contracted it. The test only indicated he was positive and nothing else.

Steve’s diagnosis affected our marriage in ways we could have never anticipated.

“We can’t tell anyone,” my husband pleaded. “I’ll tell my brothers I have a blood disorder, so if I start having symptoms, I can blame it on that.”

I nodded my head yes. My life felt like a nightmare.

Advertisement

We decided to tell our personal doctors. “Promise me you won’t tell anyone else,” Steve said.

“Yes. Yes. I promise.”

“And we can’t have sex.”

The author with Steve and Cassie in Woodstock, New York, in 2006.
The author with Steve and Cassie in Woodstock, New York, in 2006.

There would be no babies for us, even though my mother continued to try to coax us into having one.

“Why don’t you have children?” she asked repeatedly.

Advertisement

“It’s just not right for us,” I’d answer.

When I shared Steve’s diagnosis with my gynaecologist, his face fell, and his usual cheery disposition faded. He told me of a young doctor friend who, when he found out he was HIV+, jumped off his roof.

“You know, Ann, the life expectancy rate is five years after a diagnosis,” he told me.

I had heard that figure and other rumours about HIV and AIDS, but I didn’t know if they were true.

Advertisement

My therapist told me to have affairs, reasoning, “You’re too young not to have sex.”

“You could look into artificial insemination,” my gynaecologist suggested. Then he paused, shook his head, and said, “Actually, it’s probably not a good idea – you have to consider that you might wind up a single mother.”

I could play the odds of whether or not I would miscarry, but I could not fathom my life without Steve. As I got older and understood that my chances of getting pregnant were decreasing, I fantasised even more about being a mother, but the path forward felt unbearably difficult.

We thought about adopting, but after speaking with several agencies, we learned we’d have a hard – if not impossible – time being accepted. Nobody wanted to risk placing a baby in what could become a single-parent household.

Advertisement

So, we focused on our careers and bought a house in the country. From the outside, it appeared we had the perfect life. We even rescued a dog from a local animal shelter: a cute brown and white cocker spaniel named Cassie. Though she wasn’t a child, we adored her, and in so many ways, she was our baby.

Thanks to experimental medications, a diligent diet, a healthy lifestyle and good luck, Steve’s HIV+ status never progressed to AIDS.

The author and Steve at the New York City Marathon.
The author and Steve at the New York City Marathon.

Our dog Cassie passed away right before Covid-19 hit. In 2022, when I was 71, Steve was admitted to the ICU with a highly contagious strain of pneumonia that developed after he had surgery for cancer. While he was in the hospital, he used his iPad to search the internet for a puppy.

“Annie, you need a dog,” he typed. “I found one – Romeo.”

Several weeks later, the night before Steve passed, I held his hand as the nurses were getting ready to disconnect him from life support.

Advertisement

“I love you,” I told him. “I would not have chosen any other life than the one we’ve had together.”

A smile came to his lips.

I meant every word. Did I wish I had married someone else? Never. I had a wonderful life with Steve despite his health challenges and the resulting hardships we endured because of them. And through it all, we always had each other.

The author with Romeo in Riverside Park in New York City in 2023.
The author with Romeo in Riverside Park in New York City in 2023.

Would I have liked to have had a child? Of course. But just because I don’t have any children doesn’t mean that I’m alone. My brother and stepsister have children and now grandchildren. They have been a huge part of my life. I’ve watched them grow, and we care deeply about each other. And I have a wonderful group of friends and a vibrant community.

I also have Romeo. I met him a few weeks after Steve passed. He’s an adorable mini goldendoodle, and he’s always by my side – literally, following me from room to room.

Advertisement

He has brought me such joy in the midst of so much grief. He was Steve’s parting gift to me, and one more example of how even in the worst of times, he was always looking out for my happiness in whatever ways he could.

Yes, my mother was right – sort of. I would have loved to have had a child, but it wasn’t meant to be. I realise now she was just doing what she thought would be best for me. When she was near death, I told her the truth about Steve’s diagnosis. She looked at me with tears in her eyes, and whispered, “I understand.”

Even though my life turned out differently than what she expected – or I once desired – I’ve had a beautiful life. I got to spend 45 years with a man who truly loved me, and though I’m not a traditional mother, I’ve found ways to feel motherly love and be connected.

Ann Gorewitz is a writer. Her debut memoir, You, Me, & The Dog: An Unconditional Love Story (Heliotrope Books), is now available at Amazon, Barnes & Noble, Bookshop, iBooks, Kobo, Booktopia, and other eBook platforms. Ann can be contacted on Instagram @gorewitzann, Facebook @ann.gorewitz, and her website.

Advertisement

Do you have a compelling personal story you’d like to see published on HuffPost? Find out what we’re looking for here and send us a pitch at pitch@huffpost.com.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Perth shark attack: Beaches shut as deadly attack prompts rare kill order

Published

on

Police officers stand on Sorrento Beach while a police boat patrols offshore during search and recovery operations after a fatal shark attack

A rare catch-and-kill order has been issued for a great white shark off the coast of Western Australia, after a man was killed while on a morning swim at a popular beach on Friday. His body has still not been found.

Authorities have said that beaches along the state’s coast, including in the capital Perth, will remain closed until at least Sunday as the search for the shark continues.

It is the second shark attack in Western Australia (WA) this week, and the third fatal attack in the state this year.

The incident, at Sorrento Beach in Perth’s north, has reignited debate about how to keep beachgoers safe in Australia.

Advertisement

The swimmer has been identified as 63-year-old Greg O’Neill, the Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) has reported.

“Greg loved the ocean and was known as a passionate swimmer, sports lover, dedicated worker and an all-round generous, witty guy,” his family said in a statement to the broadcaster.

Witness Jacqui Rapaic told the ABC that two men were swimming, but only one made it back to shore, and that she could see “a pool of blood” in the water.

Another witness told WAtoday that she saw the man being “mauled” as the shark “tossed him around like a fish”.

Advertisement

Members of the public reported seeing a 2.5m-long (8ft 2in) shark at around the same time.

Authorities in Perth’s Joondalup area, where Sorrento is located, said all beaches were closed “as a precautionary measure” and would remain so until at least midday on Sunday.

Pictures on Saturday showed the coastline being patrolled by a police boat and helicopter.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Joanne Sheen’s close friend says ‘nothing can prepare you’ as missing mum found seven years after disappearance

Published

on

Manchester Evening News

The mum-of-three was last seen in Southampton in December 2019

A close friend of a mother-of-three whose remains were found nearly seven years after she disappeared said “nothing could prepare” her for the tragic news.

Advertisement

Rachel Roussel, from Southampton, said the discovery of the remains of Joanne Sheen – affectionately known as “Little Jo” – was “absolutely devastating”.

The Metropolitan Police were called on the evening of August 12 after bones, thought to belong to a woman aged between 25 and 45, were found at shrubland known as The Pits near Padstow Walk in Feltham after the area was affected by a blaze. Detectives had launched a murder probe, but Hampshire and Isle of Wight Constabulary have taken over the investigation after the remains were identified as those of Ms Sheen.

Click here to get the biggest stories straight to your inbox in our Daily Newsletter

A 56-year-old man from Southampton was arrested on suspicion of conspiracy to commit murder on Thursday (17 September).

Advertisement

Of the police update, Ms Roussel told the Press Association (PA): “It’s something that everybody’s heavily anticipated, and you kind of get yourself ready and prepare yourself for it. But nothing could prepare you for that, nothing at all.”

The 47-year-old said the years of uncertainty had been particularly difficult for Ms Sheen’s three daughters, two of whom she said have since become mothers themselves.

“Her daughters are mums themselves now, so they’ve had their babies, and their mum wasn’t there for that,” she said. “To have to go through something like this and to have to be going through it for so long, seven years, is just unfathomable.”

Ms Roussel, who met Ms Sheen in 2003, has launched a fundraiser on GoFundMe to help give her friend “a send-off that she so rightly deserves”.

Advertisement

“Now we can focus on helping the girls, bringing her home, and set about laying her to rest finally, which is what they’ve wanted to do,” she said. The two became close while raising their children in Townhill Park in the Hampshire city, with Ms Roussel describing her friend as a “devoted mum” with a “wicked sense of humour”.

“She was just lovely, she’d do anything for you, if you needed to nip to the shop, she’d stay and watch the children,” she told PA. “If you needed to borrow some money, and all she had was £5 in her pocket until the next income support payment dropped, she’d lend it to you.

“She was just lovely, and a devoted mum, a completely devoted mum, every ounce of her energy went into those girls, it was amazing.”

Advertisement

Ms Roussel continued: “Jo was just so much fun to be around, she had a personality that was a bit crazy, but you loved her for it. She had a wicked sense of humour, a fantastic laugh that I’ll never forget, she could make you belly laugh until your belly hurt.”

Ms Roussel recalled them celebrating birthdays, Halloween and New Year’s Eve together. Explaining why she set up the fundraiser, Ms Roussel said she had found herself asking: “What can I do?”

“She was my friend and I loved her very much and I wanted to do something to help the girls,” she said. Ms Roussel said she wanted Ms Sheen to be remembered above all as a mother and friend.

Advertisement

Ms Roussel added: “She was just an amazing human being who’d light up a room, I know that’s a very cliche thing to say about people but she really was. She was a big, big personality, an amazing friend, and she will be very sadly missed, very greatly missed by lots of people.”

The 44-year-old had not been seen since travelling from Fareham towards her home city of Southampton on December 5, 2019.

A Hampshire and Isle of Wight Constabulary spokesperson said more than 4,000 lines of inquiry have been raised, more than 300 statements taken, and detailed searches carried out at more than 10 addresses and on numerous vessels.

Advertisement

Detective Chief Inspector Toby Elcock said the identification of Ms Sheen’s remains is a “significant development” in a “long and complex investigation”. Crimestoppers has reinstated a £20,000 reward for information.

A Metropolitan Police spokesman confirmed that the remains were found by a member of the public after the nearby land was affected by a recent wildfire. The site is close to Bedfont Lakes Country Park.

Shrubbery appeared to have been burned at a woodland area close to where the police crime scene was in place last month and a large patch of the ground was charred.

An incident log on The London Fire Brigade’s website showed that four fire engines and about 25 firefighters had tackled a grass fire in the area on August 5. About two hectares of shrubland were damaged in the blaze.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Earl Spencer’s Diana book opens old wounds royals would rather forget

Published

on

Princess Diana, wearing a light blue dress and hat, sits in between a young Prince William on the left (holding his hand to his mouth) and Harry to the right. Diana is looking into the distance to the left.

At issue is Earl Spencer’s account of a conversation with the then Prince Charles after the death of Diana, with the prince accused of telling Earl Spencer: “We’ll forget her soon enough.”

He is accused of sounding “giddily elated” and like a “lottery winner” after the news of her death.

Buckingham Palace hit back with a response, which although dressed in courtier-like politeness, was essentially saying the conversation had never happened like that.

The King was said to be “mindful that the pain of fraternal grief can cloud reason, affect judgment and colour memory in ways that others do not recognise”.

Advertisement

Anyone who has lost someone knows how feelings can run high, people can hear different things about the same conversations – and families can fall out, or come together, in the wake of a death.

Psychotherapist Nick Hatter says he doesn’t have a view on which version of events is correct, but he says that during traumatic events memories can be “distorted”. A phone call doesn’t have any of the visual clues or body language to give a fuller picture, he adds.

Hatter says there can be very different and unpredictable responses to grief, including a condition known as “bereavement mania” where someone can seem inappropriately hyper or even euphoric after the loss of a loved one.

The first opinion poll on who to believe has been published by YouGov – and it suggests a very split view, with 31% believing Earl Spencer’s allegations, 36% suspecting it’s not true and 33% saying they don’t know.

Advertisement

Low thinks the book is unlikely to change many opinions, as “people have settled into their camps about how they regard Charles, how they look back on the Diana years”.

There could also be a feeling that it’s “tawdry” to rake up these claims so many years later, he says.

That’s echoed by historian and author Sir Anthony Seldon who says Earl Spencer showed great courage at the time of Diana’s funeral, but says his memoir is a “sad and unnecessary publication”.

Royal commentator Richard Palmer says the book threatens to take the royals back to the difficult days of 1997.

Advertisement

“This book and the run-up to next year’s 30th anniversary of Diana’s death threaten to undermine the Royal Household’s three decades of work to rehabilitate Charles and Camilla’s image,” he says.

Veteran broadcaster David Dimbleby, who led the BBC’s coverage of Diana’s funeral, said it seemed “odd” Earl Spencer would release the book now.

“Why 30 years later for god sake you should do it, well again you have to ask him,” he said, adding he wished the appetite for the “cycle of gossip” would decline and instead focus would shift to what kind of monarchy the country needs.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Cardiff City v Charlton Athletic LIVE: TV channel, kick-off time and team news

Published

on

Ipso logo

Cardiff City return to Championship action this lunchtime as they welcome boyhood Bluebirds fan Nathan Jones and his Charlton Athletic side to Cardiff City Stadium.

The Bluebirds are still searching for their first league win of the season, having drawn four and lost three of their opening seven games under Brian Barry-Murphy. Charlton, meanwhile, are also looking to end a four-game winless run after making a strong start to the campaign.

Kick-off is at 12.30pm, with the game being shown live on Sky Sports+.

We’ll have all the build-up, team news, action and reaction from Cardiff City Stadium right here.

Advertisement

Scroll down for live updates…

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Manchester United co-owner Sir Jim Ratcliffe says he has ‘no confidence in the UK’ and country is ‘on the slide’

Published

on

Manchester Evening News

‘The risk you’ve got this winter is that we run out of gas’

The co-owner of Manchester United FC, Sir Jim Ratcliffe, has said he has ‘no confidence in the UK’ and that the country is ‘on the slide’

Advertisement

One of Britain’s wealthiest businessmen, Sir Jim said Britain was in decline because of high taxes and immigration.

The founder of chemicals giant Ineos, who moved to Monaco from the UK in 2020, told the BBC’s Big Boss Interview: “I think the UK, unfortunately, it was a fantastic place. We had the greatest empire in the world. We were a great people. We won two world wars. We’re good, honest folk.

Click here to get the biggest stories straight to your inbox in our Daily Newsletter

“But unfortunately, at the moment, I think the UK is on the slide. It’s quite difficult to see how we arrest it. Two things: we need politicians who are tough enough to deal with some very difficult problems, and we know what the problems are.

Advertisement

“And we need politicians who will make decisions which are good for the country, not good for themselves and their party. And we haven’t had one of those for a long time.” Asked what issues politicians should focus on, Sir Jim said immigration was ‘clearly one’, as well as high taxes.

Earlier this year, Sir Jim told Sky News the UK had been ‘colonised by immigrants’ before he said he was sorry if those remarks had ‘offended some people’.

The billionaire also said failing to invest further in North Sea resources by handing licences for the Jackdaw and Rosebank oil and gas fields amounted to “insanity”, and warned the UK’s reliance on energy imports meant the country could “run out of gas” if there was a cold spell this winter.

He said: “The risk you’ve got this winter is that we run out of gas. If we have a really sharp cold spell, then there is conceivably the possibility that we’ll run out of gas and have to switch the industry off.”

It comes after Andy Burnham insisted he was “determined” to reach net zero by 2050. The Prime Minister faces pressure from both sides over looming decisions on whether to approve the controversial Jackdaw and Rosebank fields.

Climate campaigners have urged him to block the proposed new developments in the North Sea while the oil and gas industry and opposition politicians have argued they would create thousands of jobs and cut bills. Permission for one or both would throw his commitment to net zero into question.

Sir Jim also said the UK had “a bit of a green eye towards wealth at the moment”, “encouraging” the wealthiest to relocate.

Advertisement

He told the podcast: “In America they applaud people who create wealth. And the good thing about those people who create wealth is that they then spend that wealth in the economy in which they’re resident. Unfortunately, the UK has got a bit of a green eye towards wealth at the moment.

“And, unfortunately, with the things that they’ve been doing, they’ve been encouraging the people who have created wealth to leave the UK because it’s just become uncomfortable for them for tax reasons or whatever. Also, crime on the streets has gone up as well, which doesn’t help.”

Asked if he was planning on returning to the UK, the businessman said: “Not at the moment, no. I don’t see growth being tackled. “I would like to see the benefits bill cut in half and all the savings spent on robotics and AI.”

Asked whether AI would have an impact on the job market and leave many jobless, Sir Jim said: “No, no. I mean, you think about the two biggest industries that are going to change our lives, at the moment, is AI and robotics. “I mean, it’s going to have fundamental changes to the way in which we live, the way in which we work, and the UK is nowhere at the moment in those two technologies.”

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Ed Sheeran protegees Katseye UNFOLLOW star… days after Macklemore was dropped from his tour over Free Palestine remarks

Published

on

Katseye have unfollowed Ed Sheeran on Instagram days after Macklemore announced that he¿d been dropped from the British singer¿s tour - Katseye members Daniela Avanzini, Lara Raj, Yoonchae and Megan Skiendiel pictured September 11

Katseye have unfollowed Ed Sheeran on Instagram days after Macklemore announced that he’d been dropped from the British singer’s tour.

Eagle-eyed fans noticed that members Megan Skiendiel, Manon Bannerman, Yoonchae, Daniela Avanzini, Sophia LaForteza and Lara Raj were no longer in Sheeran’s followers list this week – amid a firestorm enveloping the British singer, with all his opening acts dropping out of his tour in the wake of the drama.

Raj then began following Macklemore on Instagram, while both she and Skiendiel liked the post the rapper shared revealing he was removed from the remaining Loop tour dates he was scheduled to perform at.

Now fans are speculating the girl group could boycott Sheeran, 35, on a larger scale.

Advertisement

Sheeran co-wrote Katseye’s single, Animal, which was released in July. 

The Shape of You hitmaker reached out to the group to collaborate after their 2025 single Gnarly.

Katseye have unfollowed Ed Sheeran on Instagram days after Macklemore announced that he’d been dropped from the British singer’s tour – Katseye members Daniela Avanzini, Lara Raj, Yoonchae and Megan Skiendiel pictured September 11

Advertisement
Sheeran co-wrote Katseye¿s single, Animal, which was released in July - pictured December 2025

Sheeran co-wrote Katseye’s single, Animal, which was released in July – pictured December 2025

It comes after Macklemore announced that he¿d been dropped from the British singer¿s tour after making a 'Free Palestine' speech - pictured July 2025

It comes after Macklemore announced that he’d been dropped from the British singer’s tour after making a ‘Free Palestine’ speech – pictured July 2025

But many social media followers are calling on Katseye to cut ties with Sheeran completely.

One X user posted: ‘Also now that Ed Sheeran has been proven that he stands against palestine. A reminder for eyekons that he wrote a song called ‘Animal’ for KATSEYE.

Advertisement

‘Stop streaming it because he also gains from it since he is credited as the songwriter. #Edsheerandisband’

A third chimed in: ‘Streets saying Katseye is removing Animal from the Wild World Tour set list! Ed Sheeran, you’re toast!’

While another fan sarcastically quipped: ‘Palestinians are finally free bc they unfollowed Ed Sheeran. thank you Katseye, they’re so brave.’

The Daily Mail has reached out to representatives for Katseye and Ed Sheeran for further comment but has yet to hear back.

Advertisement
Lara began following Macklemore on Instagram while both she and Megan liked the post the rapper shared revealing he was removed from the remaining Loop tour dates he was scheduled to perform at

Lara began following Macklemore on Instagram while both she and Megan liked the post the rapper shared revealing he was removed from the remaining Loop tour dates he was scheduled to perform at

Many social media followers are calling on Katseye to cut ties with Sheeran completely

Many social media followers are calling on Katseye to cut ties with Sheeran completely

Advertisement

Macklemore has made it clear that he won’t be curtailing his pro-Palestinian activism after being dropped as Sheeran’s opener after making a ‘free Palestine’ statement.

Macklemore, real name Benjamin Haggerty, called out New England Patriots owner Robert Kraft, whom he has accused of conspiring with other stadium owners to get him blackballed from Sheeran’s tour, and challenged the billionaire to match his $1million donation.

The tactic appears to have been successful, as shortly after Macklemore announced his donation on Instagram, the billionaire shared a statement on X announcing that he planned to match a $2 million donation from Sheeran.

The latest development comes after Sheeran suffered massive blowback in the wake of Macklemore’s ouster as fans unfollowed him on social media in waves and every one of his remaining opening acts withdrew from his tour.

Advertisement

In his post, Macklemore announced that he would be donating to six organizations serving Palestinians: Anera, Gaza Soup Kitchen, HEAL Palestine, Medical Aid for Palestinians, Palestine Children’s Relief Fund and the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA USA).

‘With everything that has happened over the last 48 hours, I want to bring the conversation back to where it belongs: to the Palestinian people who are still being killed, still living under military occupation, and still fighting for their freedom,’ Macklemore began his statement on Instagram.

‘I will be donating the entire $1 million of my net earnings from Ed Sheeran’s Loop Tour to six organizations working directly to support the Palestinian people,’ he continued. ‘And I invite Robert Kraft to match my donation.

‘Whatever we disagree about, perhaps we can agree on this: Palestinian lives are worth protecting,’ Macklemore stated. ‘A Palestinian life is no less valuable than any other life on this earth.’

Advertisement
After Macklemore announced on Wednesday that he would be donating $ 1million ¿ which he earned from Ed Sheeran's tour ¿ to Palestinian aid groups, Ms Rachel is doing the same; Sheeran and Macklemore seen above in 2013 in Brooklyn

After Macklemore announced on Wednesday that he would be donating $ 1million – which he earned from Ed Sheeran’s tour – to Palestinian aid groups, Ms Rachel is doing the same; Sheeran and Macklemore seen above in 2013 in Brooklyn

Macklemore announced his donation in a statement to Instagram
He said he would be donating his 'net earnings from Ed Sheeran's Loop Tour to six organizations working directly to support the Palestinian people'

Macklemore announced his donation in a statement to Instagram. He said he would be donating his ‘net earnings from Ed Sheeran’s Loop Tour to six organizations working directly to support the Palestinian people’

Macklemore then tried to move the focus away from his professional setbacks to the people he hoped to help.

‘That is what this has always been about. Not me. Not a tour. Not the headlines or the controversy,’ he continued. It is about Palestinians’ right to freedom, dignity and safety in their homeland.’

Advertisement

He added that Palestinians living amid the destruction wrought by Israeli forces faced far greater setbacks and dangers than himself.

‘I want to center the parents carrying their children into hospitals without the basic resources to treat them, and the physicians, paramedics, journalists and aid workers who keep going back in,’ Macklemore said. ‘I want to center the organizers and activists who have paid real costs for standing with Palestine. Their risk is of a far different order than mine.’

‘Just yesterday, 15-year-old Muhammad al Zinati was killed in an Israeli strike while rushing to help aid worker Sherif Lubbad, who had already been injured,’ the performer wrote. ‘He was a child. Both were murdered. Both should be alive.’

Macklemore added that countless more Palestinians’ names might never be remembered, as their families may have been wiped out.

Advertisement

The Same Love rapper admitted that ‘Writing a check is one of the least costly forms of solidarity available to me.

‘I am doing it because I can, and because these organizations are doing the work while much of the world debates it.’

But he went on to caution that ‘aid alone’ could not solve the crisis affecting Palestinians.

‘This is a manmade injustice, and I believe it requires immediate political change. Palestinians have lived for decades without basic rights and should not have to wait another day to be free,’ Macklemore wrote. ‘That is where my focus will remain. I will continue to stand with the Palestinian people and their fight for liberation.’

Advertisement

He then warned his fans: ‘When the news cycle moves on, which it will, don’t move with it.’

Macklemore concluded his post by simply stating: ‘Free Palestine.’

Macklemore has accused Robert Kraft of conspiring with other stadium owners to get him blackballed from Sheeran's tour, and challenged the billionaire to match his donation

Macklemore has accused Robert Kraft of conspiring with other stadium owners to get him blackballed from Sheeran’s tour, and challenged the billionaire to match his donation

Macklemore and Kraft announced their donations just a day after Sheeran’s opening acts on his tour all dropped out in protest over Macklemore being removed from the live dates.

Advertisement

The rapper was due to open for Sheeran at eight of the remaining ten shows on his tour in America, which continues on Friday in Philadelphia, but on Tuesday it was announced that he had been dropped.

The American rapper had faced a boycott petition to remove him after he delivered a politically motivated speech in support of Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank during his performances at MetLife Stadium in New Jersey on September 4 and 5.

Sheeran has now lost his remaining support acts – Billie Eilish’s brother and music partner Finneas, his close friend Myles Smith, Aaron Rowe, Lukas Graham and Beoga – who have all put out separate statements announcing that they will not continue with their dates on the Loop Tour.

Responding with an Instagram statement after the news he had been dropped, Macklemore claimed that Sheeran told him billionaire Robert Kraft, whose company owns the Gillette Stadium in Massachusetts where Sheeran is set to play later this month, orchestrated the move after ‘rallying stadium owners and issuing an ultimatum.’

Advertisement

Later that day, Sheeran, 35, addressed the 43-year-old rapper being removed from the tour with his own statement, which said that Macklemore’s speech had upset the owners of venues they were set to play while reminding fans he will never personally take a publicly political stance.

Finneas wrote: ‘Artists must not be silenced when they speak up for the oppressed. I have decided to withdraw from my upcoming tour dates with Ed Sheeran. I stand with Palestine and its people.’

And Irish singer Aaron Rowe took a strong stance as he wrote: ‘Ed has been a friend to me and has changed my life. I could never thank him enough for this.

‘But as Irish people, we know all too well about genocide, forced famine and violent occupation.’

Advertisement

The Hey Ma hitmaker continued by saying he ‘cannot stand by and allow billionaires to use their position of power to silence the rightful voices of those who speak up.’

The third support act who pulled out was the group Lukas Graham who wrote: ‘We should be able to speak about war, about civilians being killed, about children who deserve to grow up. Wherever they live. Whatever flag flies over them.’

It remains uncertain how the Loop Tour will proceed with zero openers scheduled and 18 dates still set through the end of the year.

Ed Sheeran's opening acts on his tour have all dropped out after Macklemore was kicked off the live dates following a 'free Palestine' speech; Sheeran is seen in December 2025 in Boston, Massachusetts

Ed Sheeran’s opening acts on his tour have all dropped out after Macklemore was kicked off the live dates following a ‘free Palestine’ speech; Sheeran is seen in December 2025 in Boston, Massachusetts

Advertisement

Sheeran broke his silence on Macklemore on Tuesday. The singer, who is a father of two, said that his audience is often young people ‘from different backgrounds,’ who do not expect his shows to be a political forum.

Sheeran assured his followers that Macklemore’s removal would not affect his tour, as he told them ‘I would never let down the fans who had made plans’.

In his reaction, which came two days after Macklemore’s own statement, he said: ‘I am appalled by the conflict between Israel and Palestine.

‘The suffering and pain caused on both sides is a human tragedy. There are too many wars across the world causing immeasurable pain, none of which should be tolerated.

Advertisement

‘Macklemore asked to join my tour last year and I agreed, because I respect him as an artist. As with all my support acts, I agree that they play a setlist of their choosing.

‘After Macklemore’s performances at my New Jersey shows, venues on my upcoming tour dates communicated that they would pull the shows if he was still supporting.’

Kraft has defended his decision to block Macklemore from performing, saying the rapper ‘crossed a line.’

‘Gillette Stadium has a longstanding commitment to providing a welcoming environment for all guests and ensuring that events held at our venue do not provide a platform for hate speech,’ Kraft said in a statement.

Advertisement

‘Based on Macklemore’s recent actions, material shared from the stage during Ed Sheeran’s shows in New Jersey, and a broader history of antisemitic rhetoric and imagery that we believe has been deeply offensive and hurtful to the Jewish community, we determined that his participation in the September 25 and 26 concerts at Gillette Stadium would cross that line.’

The promoter for the American side of Sheeran’s Loop Tour, Messina Touring Group, said in a statement that they were told by venues of future dates on the tour that ‘they will not allow a concert to take place with Macklemore on the lineup.’

‘Which would result in the cancellation of the tour and impact hundreds of thousands of fans,” a spokesperson continued to Rolling Stone. ‘After discussions with stakeholders, Macklemore will not be performing on the remaining support dates.’

As seen in fan-taken footage from his September 5 performance in New Jersey, Macklemore wore a keffiyeh at one point during his set and also performed his 2024 song Hind’s Hall with footage of Gaza on the massive screen behind him.

Advertisement

In the lyrics for Hind’s Hall, the rapper criticises actions in Gaza. Proceeds from the song go toward humanitarian efforts from the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East.

‘One of the reasons why I wanted to come on this tour was because I wanted to stand up here on stages in stadiums across America and say two words that are very near and dear to my heart: Free Palestine. I said, Free Palestine!’ he told the attendees.

‘I want those words to be loud and clear so that people from Gaza, all the way to the occupied West Bank know that we have not forgotten them.’

He then introduced Hind’s Hall, stating that it ‘was inspired by the bravery of Columbia University students who led an encampment movement that mobilized the entire world. Opened up hearts, myself included.’

Advertisement

‘So thank you to those students that risked their diplomas, that risked their tuition, that risked their scholarships, that stood up and said, “No.” CUAD students, Students for Justice in Palestine, and Jewish Voice for Peace. Thank you guys.’

He addressed the Jewish community, stating: ‘To all of my Jewish brothers and sisters: Criticism of Israel, criticism of apartheid, being against genocide in no way is a criticism of you.’

‘My message is for peace. Love. For all human beings to be treated with dignity, respect, and equality. So I say free Palestine. I say free Lebanon. I say free Cuba. I say free Congo, free Sudan, free all people in America living in fear over this terrorist organization ICE. None of us will be free until we are all free.’

Macklemore went on to post a video of his speech on social media with the caption: ‘Wanting all humans to be treated equal should never be controversial.’

Advertisement

In 2014, Macklemore issued an apology after wearing a disguise on stage in Seattle that many condemned as an anti-Semitic Jewish caricature.

In his apology after the Jewish caricature controversy, he said: ‘There is no worse feeling than being misunderstood, especially when people are hurt or offended… I respect all cultures and all people.

‘I would never intentionally put down anybody for the fabric that makes them who they are. I love human beings, love originality, and… happen to love a weird outfit from time to time.’

Macklemore added that he never thought he looked Jewish. ‘Some people there thought I looked like Ringo, some Abe Lincoln. If anything, I thought I looked like Humpty Hump with a bowl cut,’ he said.

Advertisement

Macklemore’s statement in full  

I’m not sure how to start this. So I’m going to speak from the heart and share the truth. 

Ed Sheeran and his team have made the decision to remove me from The Loop tour.

But before I get into it, I want to say something that should be obvious.  In this moment I think it matters. I am not a victim. Ed Sheeran is not a victim. Pink is not a victim. We have careers, money, opportunities, safety and audiences around the world. Whatever consequences any of us face for what we say, we get to go home to our families.

The victims are the Palestinian people. The men, women and children who have been killed, starved, displaced and forced to live through unimaginable violence. 

Advertisement

More than 20,000 children have been killed in Gaza alone. People are being killed today, and people will be killed tomorrow. I want to make sure that as I tell this story, we don’t lose sight of that.

Ed is my friend. I’ve known him for 13 years. We’ve shared late nights, studio sessions and stages. He has this infectious magic about him that I’ve grown to love. I consider him a brother. And because of that, we’ve had some difficult conversations this past week. 

The type of talks rooted in love and respect for one another that still end in a place of fundamental disagreement. Nothing I’m writing here is out of spite or because I want to tear down his character. But as I told Ed multiple times on the phone, our friendship can’t change my responsibility to tell the truth about what happened.

Last Monday, in the middle of all the media attention surrounding Pink and what I said at MetLife, Ed told me that Robert Kraft called him. 

Advertisement

We were scheduled to play Gillette Stadium later this month, which is owned by the Kraft Group. Ed told me that Kraft said I would not be allowed to perform in his stadium. 

Ed also told me that Kraft had rallied some of the other stadium owners and collectively they gave him an ultimatum: if Macklemore stays on the tour, you will not be allowed to play in our venues.

Ed was in a f**ked up position. He knew it. His typical apolitical stance was being challenged in a way it never had been before. He told me that the words “Free Palestine” and the image of the Palestinian flag were hurtful to a lot of people he spoke with. 

I told him that if those words were more offensive than tens of thousands of Palestinian children being killed by Israel, then there was a fundamental disconnect between where those people stood and where I stood. But he couldn’t get past his public facing, “I don’t take sides.”

Advertisement

And I get why people don’t. Taking a side can cost you. Money, brand deals, sponsorships, festivals, private shows, relationships and access. I’ve lost all of those things. But there is no neutral position between the oppressor and the oppressed. 

When one side has the bombs and bottomless financial and military support from America, refusing to take a side doesn’t leave you in the middle.

What I said at MetLife I have been saying on stages around the world for almost three years. So why is it an issue now? 

Because now I’m sharing a stage with one of the biggest artists in the world, in some of the biggest stadiums in America. 

Advertisement

At a certain level of exposure, “Free Palestine” becomes too much of a risk. If I kept doing the shows, saying Free Palestine, with Ed implicitly supporting it, the crowd getting loud and showing undeniable support for Palestinian liberation, what artist might speak out next? The stage becomes resistance. Maybe that’s why this time it became so important to silence me.

And one of the most effective ways to enforce that silence has been to weaponize the accusation of antisemitism. Antisemitism is real. And that is exactly why the word matters too much to be used as a shield against criticism of the Israeli state. 

When criticizing Israel, opposing Zionism or saying “Free Palestine” gets conflated with hatred of Jewish people, it doesn’t protect Jewish people. It protects Israel from accountability.

I hope this isn’t the end of my relationship with Ed. Thirteen years of friendship doesn’t disappear because of one painful disagreement. I hope we both continue listening, studying what is happening in Palestine and wrestling with what neutrality means in a moment like this. My door will always be open to continuing that conversation.

Advertisement

When my brother Omar was doing the subtitles for the video I posted from MetLife, I thanked him. He told me there’s a phrase in Arabic: لا شكر على واجب

“La shukra ala wajeb.” There is no thanks for a duty.

That stayed with me. Because that’s what this has become for me and millions of others around the world. A duty. Not something deserving of praise or gratitude. Not brave. Human.

Who is winning the internet, who is getting canceled, who gets to play the stadium and who doesn’t, all of it becomes so small when held against what we are actually witnessing in Gaza and the West Bank. 

Advertisement

An entire people being displaced, starved and killed while the world debates which words we are allowed to use to describe it, how those words make us feel, and whether our discomfort matters more than the people living through a genocide.

I didn’t need 10 shows from Ed. I needed 2. Two chances to stand in front of 90,000 people and say the words that somehow became too dangerous to say. 

Free Palestine.

But if those words cost me the stage, while turning the conversation back to Palestine, then it was the most successful tour I’ve ever been on.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Parents could face prison for child’s crimes under justice reforms, minister says

Published

on

A stock image of a police officer with his back to the camera

Parents could lose their benefits or face prison sentences for their children’s crimes under reforms to the youth justice system, a minister has said.

Youth Justice Minister Jake Richards told the Times newspaper the system “should hold parents to account in a proportionate way for ensuring that they play their role in keeping communities safe”.

His comments come after the government set out plans in May to strengthen and expand Parenting Orders, which can currently compel parents or guardians to address their child’s behaviour by attending counselling sessions or face fines.

Richards said prison sentences would only apply “in the most extreme cases” and would be up to judges’ discretion.

Advertisement

He described the proposed changes in England and Wales as part of a “carrot-and-stick” approach.

“Parenting orders are going to make sure that parents are more involved in the process by which we try to turn around young offenders,” Richards told the Times.

“Yes, that will have some stick. It could be custodial, or docking benefits – ultimately it will be up to a judge. But we want them to be more involved and that comes with responsibilities as well.”

Critics of the proposals say engaging with parents on a voluntary basis is generally more effective in building trusting relationships and providing support.

Advertisement

Jess Mullen, chief executive of the Alliance for Youth Justice which represents more than 70 organisations that advocate for children, previously questioned how putting parents in prison would provide “stability or support for the child”.

When the government white paper was announced in May, then Justice Secretary David Lammy said that strengthening parenting orders would mean “there are real consequences for parents and carers who wilfully fail to support efforts to address their children’s behaviour.”

He told BBC Breakfast at the time that if a parent was struggling, then the “judge can intervene to make sure that the young person is getting the support that they need and the parent is doing the best that they can”.

He also said he expected the power to jail parents to be used “very, very rarely”.

Advertisement

Courts are currently required to consider issuing a Parenting Order where a child under 16 has been convicted of an offence.

They can also consider an order for 16 and 17-year-olds if they believe this would help prevent further offences.

The term of the order must not exceed 12 months and breach of a parenting order is a criminal offence with a maximum £1,000 fine, according to the Sentencing Council.

However, government statistics show the use of parenting orders has declined in recent years, from more than 1,000 orders in 2009/10 to just 33 in 2022/23.

Advertisement

The government’s youth justice reform plans come after Phase One of the Southport Inquiry report found “catastrophic” failures by the parents of the Southport killer Axel Rudakubana and various agencies meant clear chances to prevent the 2024 child murders were missed.

In the interview with the Times, Richards also rejected calls from lawyers to raise the age of criminal responsibility from 10, saying it would undermine “public faith” in the justice system and it was “not a priority at all”.

In June, the Bar Council, the representative body for barristers in England and Wales, said the threshold should rise to 14 due to criminalisation at such an early age not being an “effective, proportionate or just response”.

The United Nations has previously pointed out the UK has some of the lowest ages of criminal responsibility in the world and that it should rise it to the UN recommendation of at least 14.

Advertisement

Additional reporting by André Rhoden-Paul

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025