Crypto World
If War With Iran Is Almost Certain, How Might Bitcoin Price React?
Bitcoin price is on the edge again.
Price swings are getting crazy, and it’s sitting around $67,400 like it’s not sure which way to jump. Traders are nervous. Really nervous.
On Polymarket, bettors now put the odds of a U.S. strike on Iran this month at 61%. Crypto felt it fast. Liquidations rolled in. Risk-off mode kicked on. And suddenly, everyone’s playing defense.
Key Takeaways
The Signal: Polymarket bettors price in a 61% chance of imminent US military action.
The Risk: Short-Term Holder SOPR has dipped below 1.0, indicating panic selling at a loss.
The Impact: Bitcoin risks breaking critical $65,000 support if conflict escalates this weekend.
Why Is This Happening Now?
Tensions between Washington and Tehran feels almost certain now.
Reports say the Pentagon has strike options ready after nuclear talks stalled. That kind of headline pushes investors straight into gold and cash. Risk assets get dumped first.
On chain data backs it up. The Short Term Holder SOPR is below 1. That means recent buyers are selling at a loss just to get out.
Add in uncertainty around possible Fed policy tweaks and you get a messy mix. Geopolitics plus macro pressure. While the US Iran story dominates, Bitcoin is trading like a classic risk asset, with sharp intraday drops and fragile sentiment.
What Does This Mean for Bitcoin Price?
Bitcoin is leaning hard on the $66,000 to $65,729 support zone. Lose that on a daily close and $60,000 comes into focus fast.
The short term Sharpe ratio has flipped negative, showing ugly risk adjusted returns during the panic. Nearly $80M in longs have already been wiped out since the drop from $70,000.
While retail is dumping, some political insiders are floating massive long term targets. That hints whales may see this dip as opportunity. Arthur Hayes also pointed to Treasury liquidity dynamics that could support crypto once the dust settles.
Volatility into the weekend looks guaranteed. But talks in Oman on Friday could change the tone. If tensions cool, a sharp relief rally could trap late shorts.
Discover: Here are the crypto likely to explode!
The post If War With Iran Is Almost Certain, How Might Bitcoin Price React? appeared first on Cryptonews.
CME Group will run cryptocurrency futures and options on CME Globex around the clock starting May 29, 2026, after recording $3 trillion in notional volume across its crypto derivatives in 2025.
Why it matters:
- Traders can react to breaking news on weekends, eliminating the price gap risk that builds when crypto markets move while CME is closed.
- Institutions managing crypto exposure via CME derivatives gain continuous hedging access, reducing overnight risk accumulation.
- The move signals CME’s direct response to demand from TradFi firms scaling into digital assets.
The details:
- CME Group announced the 24/7 schedule on February 19, 2026, pending regulatory approval, per an official press release.
- Crypto derivatives average daily volume (ADV) hit 407,200 contracts year-to-date in 2026, up 46% year-over-year.
- Futures ADV reached 403,900 contracts, up 47% year-over-year, per CME Group data.
- Average daily open interest stands at 335,400 contracts, up 7% year-over-year.
- CME confirmed the launch date of May 29, 2026, via its official X account.
The big picture:
- CME’s 2025 crypto notional volume of $3 trillion confirms institutional demand for regulated derivatives now rivals spot market activity.
- The 24/7 schedule aligns CME with native crypto exchanges, which have always traded continuously, narrowing a structural gap between TradFi and DeFi.
- Continuous trading on a regulated venue could pull institutional volume away from offshore perpetual futures markets.
The post CME Launches 24/7 Crypto Futures Trading Starting May 29 appeared first on BeInCrypto.
Tether’s USDT, the world’s largest US dollar-pegged stablecoin, is heading for its steepest monthly decline in years as large holders step up redemptions, according to blockchain data.
The circulating supply of USDt (USDT) fell by about $1.5 billion so far in February, following an $1.2 billion decrease in January, according to Artemis Analytics data reported by Bloomberg. This puts USDT on track for the biggest monthly drop in three years, weeks after the collapse of cryptocurrency exchange FTX in November 2022.
The USDT supply logged a $2 billion decrease in December 2022 after the collapse of FTX and its 150 subsidiaries sent shockwaves through the crypto industry.
The decline may signal a contraction in crypto market liquidity, as Tether’s USDT is the primary on-ramp for crypto investors. Its $183 billion market capitalization accounts for about 71% of the total stablecoin market, according to CoinMarketCap.
Cointelegraph reached out to Tether for comment on what is driving the February supply drop, but had not received a response by publication.
Related: BlackRock enters DeFi as institutional crypto push accelerates: Finance Redefined
Total stablecoin market cap flat in February
The pullback in USDT has not translated into a broader contraction across dollar-linked stablecoins.
The total market capitalization of stablecoins across all exchanges has risen 2.33% so far in February, from $300 billion to $307 billion, according to DeFiLlama data.
While the two leading stablecoins, USDT and Circle’s USDC (USDC), both decreased by 1.7% and 0.9%, respectively, the Trump-family-linked World Liberty Financial’s USD1 (USD1) stablecoin recorded a 50% increase in market capitalization over the past month and was valued at $5.1 billion as of Friday, according to DeFiLlama.
Related: Wells Fargo sees ‘YOLO’ trade driving $150B into Bitcoin and risk assets
Whales and smart money traders offload USDT, but fresh wallets stepping in
Whales, or large cryptocurrency investors, have been cutting their USDT holdings, but new participants are bringing fresh demand for the leading stablecoin.
Whale wallets sold $69.9 million USDT across 22 wallets over the past week, marking a 1.6-fold increase in the selling rate of this cohort, according to crypto intelligence platform Nansen.
The leading traders by returns, tracked as “smart money,” have also been net sellers of USDT. At the same time, new wallets created in the past 15 days bought roughly $591 million worth of USDT over the week, according to the platform.
The mixed flows highlight a market split between large holders redeeming or reallocating capital and new entrants stepping in to take the other side, even as overall stablecoin issuance remains broadly steady.
Magazine: Crypto wanted to overthrow banks, now it’s becoming them in stablecoin fight
Crypto World
As Ethereum staking surges, SolStaking expands the opportunity for scalable crypto returns
Disclosure: This article does not represent investment advice. The content and materials featured on this page are for educational purposes only.
With over half of all ETH now staked, platforms like SolStaking are positioning themselves to serve investors shifting from short-term trading toward structured yield strategies.
Summary
- More than 50% of Ethereum’s circulating supply is locked in staking, signaling a market shift toward long-term participation and reduced liquid supply.
- SolStaking offers fixed-term automated staking plans executed via smart contracts, targeting predictable returns and hands-off participation.
- Its infrastructure emphasizes institutional safeguards, including audits by PwC and custody insurance from Lloyd’s of London, alongside asset segregation and encryption.
Ethereum has quietly crossed a major threshold.
More than half of its total supply is now locked in staking. Even as ETH trades below recent highs, participation continues to increase. Over 50% of the network’s circulating supply is committed to validation rather than short-term trading.
That shift matters.
When supply tightens and long-term participation rises, market dynamics begin to change. The focus moves from daily volatility to sustained yield generation.
For many investors, the conversation is no longer just about price appreciation. It’s about capital efficiency.
That is where SolStaking positions itself.
About SolStaking
SolStaking is a multi-asset cryptocurrency staking platform operating under its U.S.-registered entity, Sol Investments, LLC.
The platform operates through automated smart contracts. Once a plan is activated, distributions are executed according to predefined contract terms without manual intervention.
Participation plans currently include:
Trial Plan — $100 — 2 Days — ~$108
TRX Income Plan — $3,000 — 15 Days — ~$3,585
XRP Flagship Plan — $30,000 — 30 Days — ~$44,400
BTC Flagship Plan — $300,000 — 50 Days — ~$630,000
Complete plan details are available on the official website.
Institutional-grade infrastructure
SolStaking operates with a framework designed for operational clarity and asset oversight:
- U.S.-registered entity: Sol Investments, LLC
- Separation of user assets and corporate operating funds
- Independent audits conducted by PwC
- Custody insurance provided by Lloyd’s of London
- Enterprise-grade encryption and continuous system monitoring
This infrastructure supports consistent smart contract execution and platform integrity.
Real-world asset integration
Beyond digital staking, SolStaking integrates real-world assets into its broader ecosystem, including:
- AI data centers
- Sovereign and investment-grade bonds
- Physical gold and commodities
- Industrial metals
- Logistics infrastructure
- Agriculture and clean energy projects
These components contribute to the platform’s operational ecosystem while smart contracts manage on-chain settlement processes.
Getting started
- Register on the official SolStaking platform.
- Deposit supported assets (XRP, BTC, ETH, SOL, USDT, USDC, LTC, DOGE).
- Select a smart contract plan.
- Activate participation.
Users can monitor balances and settlement progress in real time.
Conclusion
As digital asset markets mature, participation models are evolving.
For many investors, capital deployment is no longer limited to directional trading. Automated smart contract participation provides an alternative approach focused on predefined timelines and programmed execution.
SolStaking delivers fixed-term staking participation within a framework designed for transparency, automation, and operational structure.
To learn more about SolStaking, visit the official website. Email: [email protected]
Disclosure: This content is provided by a third party. Neither crypto.news nor the author of this article endorses any product mentioned on this page. Users should conduct their own research before taking any action related to the company.
For years, crypto markets have operated with a clear gap. DeFi introduced open and transparent trading, while centralized exchanges continued to handle most price discovery. The difference came down to infrastructure. Most blockchains focused on running applications, not high-speed trading. Order books, tight spreads, and real-time hedging demand fast execution and low costs, and that level of performance is now becoming non-negotiable.
At these volumes, the pressure on infrastructure becomes obvious. According to DeFiLlama, decentralized perpetual futures markets are now clearing roughly $20–30 billion in daily volume, with monthly volumes regularly approaching the $1 trillion range depending on market conditions.
As this trend accelerates, MegaETH, a high-performance Ethereum Layer 2 built around ultra-low latency and high throughput, has gone live. Among the first flagship applications to launch on this Layer 2 network on February 17 was World Markets – a decentralized trading platform that unifies spot trading, perpetual futures, and lending under a single account.
As one of the first full trading platforms on the network, it effectively serves as an early test of whether performance-focused chains can support institutional-style market structure on-chain.
When Markets Outgrow the Infrastructure
For most of DeFi’s first wave, the focus was composability. Protocols stacked on top of each other, liquidity moved across AMMs, and lending markets thrived.
However, serious trading is different from yield farming.
Order books require constant updates. Market makers need predictable fees. High-frequency traders need execution that doesn’t lag behind centralized venues by seconds. Even small inefficiencies compound when leverage is involved.
That’s where many general-purpose chains struggled.
Gas fees on networks like Base or Arbitrum can fluctuate dramatically during congestion. Latency, even if acceptable for swaps or NFT mints, becomes a real issue when managing leveraged derivatives.
Kevin Coons, founder of World Markets, speaks candidly:
“There has yet to be a successful DEX on a general purpose chain. Two simple reasons are gas and speed. Gas costs can be close to 100x higher. High gas costs prevent market makers from being able to quote tight spreads meaning on-chain exchanges can’t be competitive with Binance, until now.”
Whether or not one agrees with the 100x comparison, the broader point resonates: tight spreads and fast execution aren’t optional features in capital markets. They’re the foundation.
Coons adds:
“Speed matters to an extent. Being within range of Binance is important for getting price discovery on-chain. MegaETH is the first chain where price discovery is possible.”
That statement speaks to a larger trend. If decentralized markets want to compete, they can’t just be transparent but efficient as well.
MegaETH and the Rise of Performance Chains
MegaETH has positioned itself differently from earlier Ethereum scaling efforts.
Instead of focusing only on cheaper gas, it emphasizes performance metrics closer to centralized systems, targeting very high throughput and low confirmation times. The project has publicly referenced stress tests processing billions of transactions ahead of mainnet launch.
Official docs and ecosystem materials emphasize execution speed specifically for latency-sensitive use cases like order books and gaming.
This approach aligns with a pattern seen elsewhere. Hyperliquid, another trading-focused environment, has become one of the most active perpetual futures venues onchain, frequently clearing billions in daily volume.
The takeaway is that markets seem to gravitate toward infrastructure built specifically for trading workloads. General-purpose chains aren’t disappearing but capital markets are starting to migrate toward environments designed for financial throughput.
What World Markets Is Trying to Change
World Markets enters this environment with a structural design choice: unified margin.
Instead of forcing traders to separate capital across spot markets, perpetual futures, and lending platforms, the system keeps everything under a single portfolio.
On paper, that sounds straightforward. In practice, it opens the door to strategies that were previously difficult on-chain, including basis trades that exploit the structural gap between borrow rates and perpetual funding rates.
Traditional DeFi often leaves capital fragmented and heavily overcollateralized, forcing traders to split borrowing, hedging, and execution across separate platforms, with billions in capital sitting idle or locked inefficiently because the infrastructure never unified those functions.
World Markets attempts to consolidate all of that. The platform’s ATLAS risk engine enables portfolio-level margining and undercollateralized lending – mechanics more common in prime brokerage models than in early DeFi protocols.
In traditional finance, hedge funds operate under consolidated accounts where risk is assessed at the portfolio level. DeFi historically hasn’t worked that way.
World Markets is effectively attempting to replicate prime brokerage-style capital management on-chain, giving traders access to structures that have traditionally been reserved for institutional desks.
Rethinking Liquidations and Risk
Liquidation mechanics are one of the most controversial parts of leveraged trading.
Most exchanges, both centralized or decentralized, rely on automated systems that close positions once thresholds are breached. While necessary for solvency, those systems can override trader discretion.
World Markets frames its model differently. In Coons’ view:
“Sophisticated traders have highly leveraged portfolios. They reduce risk by hedging… Exchanges currently socialize these losses to their users by closing out their positions. On World Markets you have ultimate control over your risk. We don’t decide your risk for you.”
The idea is to give traders more direct control over counterparty exposure rather than relying entirely on exchange-imposed forced liquidations.
Whether that model scales will depend on adoption and liquidity depth. But structurally, it signals a move away from rigid, siloed liquidation logic toward portfolio-based risk management.
Where On-Chain Markets Are Heading
Zooming out, this moment is bigger than any single platform. Decentralized markets are beginning to outgrow the general-purpose infrastructure they were originally built on. DeFi’s first phase focused on access and composability. The next phase is about capital efficiency, execution quality, and market structure that can handle real trading volume.
According to Messari’s 2025 derivatives research, perpetual futures have become one of the largest segments of DeFi by volume, accounting for a significant share of total on-chain activity.
At that scale, performance stops being optional. Competing with centralized venues requires tighter spreads, faster execution, and deeper liquidity, all of which depend on infrastructure designed specifically for financial workloads.
MegaETH is aligning itself with that change, and World Markets’ launch represents one of the earliest attempts to run a fully integrated trading stack, including a central limit order book, on infrastructure designed specifically for high-speed financial execution. It signals a maturing phase for DeFi, where the chain itself becomes a strategic choice aligned with the demands of capital markets.
This Friday, we examine Ethereum, Ripple, Cardano, Binance Coin, and Hyperliquid in greater detail.
Ethereum (ETH)
Ethereum had a mostly flat week, closing up only 1%. This means buyers managed to defend the key support at $1,800. The sell momentum is also fading, which could hint at a possible reversal soon.
The current resistance levels are found at $2,000 and $2,400. Given the price closed in the red over the last four weeks, a relief rally appears likely and could test these key levels.
Looking ahead, Ethereum may be completing its second leg down in an ABC correction. If so, bulls may soon make their presence known on the order book. That starts once the $2,000 level is reclaimed.
Ripple (XRP)
XRP closes the week up 5%. However, this was not sufficient to turn the chart bullish. That’s because the attempt to break the resistance at $1.6 was rejected sharply by sellers.
Such a rejection is a bearish signal that the downtrend may still continue for some time. If so, a retest of support at $1.4 and even $1 is likely in the future.
Looking ahead, the sell momentum continues to dominate, which can lead to lower price levels. Watch closely how the price reacts at $1.4 for a good indication of where XRP will go next.
Cardano (ADA)
ADA is hanging close to the support at $0.28, but appears to struggle and may lose this level again. If so, expect lower prices in the future, with key support at $0.24. This comes after a 6% gain to close the week.
Cardano’s price action mirrors somewhat the one from XRP. The momentum remains bearish, but sellers and buyers are still fighting for dominance at the key support. Either way, a decisive move can be expected soon.
Looking ahead, ADA had a very disappointing year so far and this will not change until it reclaims a price above 50 cents. That’s the moment when bulls could hope for sustained gains.
Binance Coin (BNB)
Binance Coin has been hugging the $580 support level over the past week and closed with a 3% gain. Sellers also appear to be taking a break, but that does not mean the selloff is over.
The current resistance is at $690 and has not tested to date. This shows buyers are still hesitant to return here, but the signs are promising since the selling volume has decreased substantially lately.
Looking ahead, if BNB can hold here, then buyers may gather enough courage to push higher and challenge the resistance at $690. If, however, sellers return in force, the price could fall to $500 next.
Hype (HYPE)
HYPE closed the week in the red with a 5% loss. This comes after a sharp rejection at the $36 and $30 resistance levels. Buyers are on the defensive, which could see the price fall lower up to the key support at $26.
If $26 is lost later as well, that will be an extremely bearish signal, which could see HYPE make new lows this year. On the other hand, if that level holds, then it could be interpreted as a higher lo,w which will encourage buyers to return once more.
Looking ahead, this cryptocurrency is found in a pullback that may last a while. Best to be patient here and wait for bulls and bears to show their intention around $26 first.
SECRET PARTNERSHIP BONUS for CryptoPotato readers: Use this link to register and unlock $1,500 in exclusive BingX Exchange rewards (limited time offer).
Disclaimer: Information found on CryptoPotato is those of writers quoted. It does not represent the opinions of CryptoPotato on whether to buy, sell, or hold any investments. You are advised to conduct your own research before making any investment decisions. Use provided information at your own risk. See Disclaimer for more information.
Metaplanet’s chief executive Simon Gerovich pushed back against criticisms from anonymous accounts alleging that the company misrepresented its Bitcoin treasury strategy and disclosures. Critics on X argued that Metaplanet delayed or withheld price-sensitive information about large BTC purchases and options trades funded with shareholder capital, and that losses from its derivatives program were not fully disclosed. In a detailed public post on X, Gerovich contends that the company has consistently reported all Bitcoin purchases, option strategies and borrowings, and that readers have misinterpreted the financial statements rather than uncovering any misconduct.
Key takeaways
- Metaplanet disclosed four Bitcoin purchases in September 2025 totaling 11,832 BTC (1,009 on Sept. 1; 136 on Sept. 8; 5,419 on Sept. 22; 5,268 on Sept. 30), with the company asserting prompt disclosure for each move.
- The firm’s public dashboard corroborates the September buys, and Bitcointreasuries.net also lists the transactions along with related announcements and filings.
- Gerovich said selling put options and put spreads were designed to acquire BTC below spot and monetize volatility for shareholders, rather than betting on short-term price swings.
- Metaplanet reported fiscal 2025 revenue of 8.9 billion yen (about $58 million), up roughly 738% year over year, but posted a net loss near $680 million due to a decline in the value of its Bitcoin holdings.
- As the debate around Bitcoin treasury strategies grows, Metaplanet’s disclosures and borrowing activities—including a credit facility set up in late 2025—remain under scrutiny by investors and regulators alike.
- Beyond Metaplanet, the sector faces broader questions about the sustainability of BTC-heavy treasuries, with peers such as Strategy posting large quarterly losses despite signaling a long-term outlook.
Tickers mentioned: $BTC
Sentiment: Neutral
Market context: The controversy surrounding Metaplanet’s Bitcoin treasury approach unfolds as crypto markets experience liquidity shifts and ongoing scrutiny of corporate crypto holdings. The sector’s dynamics are further colored by notable market moves and annual results from other BTC holders, including Strategy, which reported a $12.4 billion net loss in Q4 2025 as Bitcoin declined, highlighting the tension between revenue opportunities from BTC-related activities and material impairment risks tied to price swings.
Why it matters
For investors tracking crypto-native treasuries, Metaplanet’s disclosures illuminate how such firms balance disclosure requirements with the volatility of digital assets. The company’s strategy—using option structures to monetize volatility while seeking BTC below spot via puts—shows a deliberate approach to acquiring exposure without entirely relying on directional bets. The earnings mix, where revenue from Bitcoin-related activities rose substantially while the balance sheet reflected non-cash losses tied to price movements, underscores a broader accounting challenge: treating asset impairments as business costs can mask underlying revenue growth and cash-generation potential.
From a governance standpoint, the incident underscores the importance of transparent, timely disclosures as markets increasingly scrutinize how corporate treasuries operate in real time. The availability of data on Metaplanet’s public analytics dashboard and third-party trackers adds a layer of accountability, but it also raises questions about the sufficiency of disclosures for complex derivatives programs and loan facilities tied to crypto assets. The sector’s trajectory will hinge on how well such disclosures align with investor expectations and how regulators interpret leverage and protections within crypto-backed borrowings.
For builders and users in the crypto space, this episode reinforces the need for robust risk management and clear accounting treatment for digital assets. As platforms experiment with diversified revenue streams tied to BTC, including options income and structured borrowings, maintaining clarity around valuation, impairment, and liquidity is essential to sustain investor confidence during periods of price volatility.
What to watch next
- Updates to Metaplanet’s disclosures page detailing borrowing terms, collateral, and facility conditions following the October 2025 credit line.
- New BTC purchase or sale disclosures that align with the September timeline and any subsequent months, including any changes to the company’s public dashboard.
- Additional commentary from Metaplanet’s leadership on X and any subsequent investor communications clarifying accounting treatment of asset impairments.
- Public trackers like Bitcointreasuries.net updating holdings in response to new disclosures or market moves.
- Regulatory or market developments affecting crypto-treasury strategies, including any updates to lending terms or disclosure requirements for listed BTC-holding vehicles.
Sources & verification
- Metaplanet analytics page: https://metaplanet.jp/en/analytics
- Bitcointreasuries.net listing: http://bitcointreasuries.net
- X post by Metaplanet on September purchases: https://x.com/Metaplanet/status/1962340921049309536
- Gerovich’s explanatory post: https://x.com/gerovich/status/2024646152877133907
- September BTC purchases previously disclosed: https://x.com/tenb1/status/2024099604044890455
- Metaplanet revenue and impairment discussion: https://cointelegraph.com/news/metaplanet-revenue-jumps-738-percent-bitcoin-generates-95-percent-revenue
- Impairment-related revenue context: https://cointelegraph.com/news/metaplanet-raises-revenue-forecast-bitcoin-impairment
- Bitcoin-backed borrowings and disclosures: https://metaplanet.jp/en/shareholders/disclosures
- Related coverage of BTC treasury strategies and performance: https://cointelegraph.com/news/strategy-reports-12b-loss-q4-2025
- Big questions on macro and gold references: https://cointelegraph.com/magazine/china-stockpiling-gold-yaun-global-reserve-us-dollar/
Metaplanet defends Bitcoin treasury strategy amid investor scrutiny
Bitcoin (CRYPTO: BTC) sits at the center of Metaplanet’s corporate strategy, a fact that has drawn sharp questions from observers about disclosure timeliness, asset valuation and the company’s approach to risk management. In a detailed post on X, Simon Gerovich laid out the sequence of events that led to September 2025’s Bitcoin purchases and the accompanying derivative strategies designed to generate income while controlling entry points for BTC exposure. He emphasized that the company’s real-time dashboard and public disclosures provide a transparent view of the purchases, option strategies and borrowing activity that underpin the treasury program.
According to Metaplanet, the September buys were executed in four distinct transactions: 1,009 BTC on Sept. 1; 136 BTC on Sept. 8; 5,419 BTC on Sept. 22; and 5,268 BTC on Sept. 30. The total of these maneuvers equates to 11,832 BTC acquired over the month, a figure the company asserts was promptly disclosed. The public dashboard, which is accessible to investors and researchers alike, corroborates these entry points and offers a transparent ledger of the company’s Bitcoin holdings and related activity. The Bitcointreasuries.net tracker, which aggregates corporate BTC holdings and their disclosures, also reflects these transactions and the accompanying public announcements.
Gerovich defended the use of put options and put spreads as a mechanism to acquire BTC at levels below the spot price while monetizing volatility in a way that benefits shareholders, rather than speculating on sprint-to-the-close price moves. The approach, he argued, is aligned with a risk-managed treasury strategy that seeks to build a long-term Bitcoin position through measured, disclosed steps rather than abrupt, undisclosed trades. He further highlighted that the company has historically disclosed all relevant purchases, borrowings and option strategies, urging readers to examine the financial statements with this context in mind.
Beyond operational disclosures, Metaplanet’s 2025 financial results painted a mixed picture. The company reported revenue of 8.9 billion yen (roughly $58 million), a surge of about 738% year over year, reflecting the strength of its Bitcoin-related activities. Yet the firm also recorded a net loss of approximately $680 million, attributed to the marked impairment in the value of its Bitcoin holdings as prices slumped. Gerovich contended that non-cash impairment charges are an accounting consequence of asset valuation rather than a reflection of trading missteps or misalignment with the treasury plan. In other words, the revenue line demonstrates activity and monetization potential, while the impairment line reflects the price-driven realities of holding a volatile asset.
Metaplanet has not shied away from highlighting the non-cash nature of certain losses, arguing that the accounting treatment of digital assets does not imply strategic failure. The company underlined that it established a credit facility in October 2025 and disclosed subsequent drawdowns in November and December, including information on borrowing amounts, collateral and general terms on its disclosures page. The lender’s identity and specific rates were kept confidential at the counterparty’s request, Gerovich noted, but he stressed that the borrowing terms were favorable and that the balance sheet remained strong despite Bitcoin’s movements.
The broader industry backdrop adds another layer of context to Metaplanet’s defenses. A cluster of Bitcoin treasury plays has come under scrutiny as investors weigh the sustainability of long-term BTC-based financing strategies. Strategy, historically the largest corporate holder of BTC, reported a substantial quarterly loss in late 2025 as Bitcoin’s price deteriorated, even as the company emphasized a longer horizon and a robust capital structure. This juxtaposition—strong revenue streams from BTC activities against sizable impairments in asset values—helps explain why market participants are closely scrutinizing disclosure practices, risk controls and governance around crypto treasuries.
As Metaplanet continues to publish data and respond to scrutiny, the industry will likely watch not only for new purchases or borrowings but also for the consistency and clarity of its accounting disclosures. The balance between revenue growth from Bitcoin-derived activities and the non-cash losses tied to asset valuations will remain a focal point for investors evaluating the viability of BTC-heavy treasury models in a volatile market environment.
Longtime Bitcoin critic Peter Schiff has reignited debate over the cryptocurrency’s outlook, warning that a break below $50,000 could trigger a steep drop toward $20,000, an 84% decline from its all-time high.
Summary
- Peter Schiff warned that if Bitcoin breaks below $50,000, it could fall to $20,000 — an 84% drop from its all-time high — urging investors to “sell Bitcoin now.”
- Schiff argued that while Bitcoin has suffered similar drawdowns before, the current market carries greater risk due to increased leverage, institutional ownership, and overall market size.
- His comments sparked backlash on X, with users pointing to his long history of bearish calls and defending Bitcoin’s long-term value proposition as a censorship-resistant, globally liquid financial network.
Sell Bitcoin now, says Peter Schiff
In a post on X, Schiff argued that “if Bitcoin breaks $50K, which looks likely, it seems highly likely it will at least test $20K,” adding that such a move would mirror previous drawdowns but unfold under very different market conditions.
“I know Bitcoin has done that before,” he wrote, “but never with so much hype, leverage, institutional ownership, and market cap at stake. Sell Bitcoin now!”
Schiff, a prominent gold advocate and frequent crypto skeptic, has long maintained that Bitcoin’s price cycles resemble speculative bubbles fueled by liquidity and investor enthusiasm. His latest warning comes amid renewed volatility in digital asset markets, where traders are closely watching key technical levels.
An 84% retracement would echo past bear markets. Bitcoin has previously suffered drawdowns exceeding 70% following euphoric rallies, including after its 2017 peak and again following its 2021 high. However, the asset’s structure has evolved significantly, with spot exchange-traded funds, corporate treasuries, and institutional allocators now holding sizable positions.
Schiff’s latest warning quickly drew pushback on X, where critics accused the longtime gold advocate of repeating a decade-old bearish script.
One user claimed investors who followed his past calls on silver were left “stuck in it for 20 years,” referencing the metal’s prolonged stagnation after previous peaks. Others pointed to Schiff’s history of urging investors to sell Bitcoin at far lower levels, noting that he has been issuing similar warnings since the asset traded near $100.
A separate response argued that Bitcoin’s “intrinsic value” lies in its censorship-resistant settlement network, global liquidity, and lack of gatekeepers, framing its volatility not as a flaw but as the market’s process of pricing a new financial system in real time.
The exchange shows the entrenched divide between Schiff and Bitcoin advocates, with critics portraying his latest $20,000 forecast as a continuation of a long-running skepticism that has so far failed to derail the cryptocurrency’s broader upward trajectory.
Still, Schiff’s comments highlight a persistent divide in the investment community: whether Bitcoin’s growing institutional footprint makes it more resilient or more vulnerable in the event of a sharp downturn.
Aztec (AZTEC) surged about 82% in 24 hours to around $0.035 after South Korean exchanges Upbit and Bithumb both moved to list the token with local currency pairs, triggering a wave of KRW-denominated buying into a thinly traded market.
Korean listings still matter because they flip a token from being crypto-only to something a huge retail base can buy directly with local currency.
South Korea consistently ranks among the top three countries by crypto trading volume relative to population, and Upbit alone regularly matches or exceeds Coinbase in daily spot turnover during active sessions.
A KRW pair cuts out the extra hop through USDT, plugs into Korea’s unusually active spot trading culture, and puts the token on the screens people in the region actually watch. And that kind of exposure can be transformative for smaller-cap tokens like AZTEC.
Traders often treat new Upbit and Bithumb listings as momentum events, rushing in before liquidity deepens and before the initial premium fades. The pattern has played out repeatedly — tokens like VIRTUAL have printed double-digit moves on Korean listing announcements alone, regardless of what the underlying project was doing at the time.
In thin books, that dynamic creates the kind of vertical candle AZTEC printed. Once prices gap higher locally, arbitrageurs step in, buying on global venues and selling into the Korean bid, which helps drag prices up across the board. The so-called “kimchi premium” — the persistent spread between Korean and international prices — tends to widen sharply during these episodes before narrowing as arb flow catches up.
Aztec itself is pitched as an Ethereum-based, privacy-focused layer 2 that uses zero-knowledge proofs to enable encrypted transactions on a public chain. That gives the token a narrative beyond the listing event.
The premium had narrowed slightly by the Asian evening session as arbitrage flow caught up and the surge showed signs of exhaustion.
[PRESS RELEASE – GIG HARBOR, Washington, February 20th, 2026]
IP Strategy Holdings, Inc. (Nasdaq: IPST) (the “Company” or “IP Strategy”), the first company to adopt a treasury reserve policy centered on the $IP token, today announced the board of directors has authorized a share repurchase program whereby the Company may buy back up to 1 million shares of its outstanding shares of common stock through December 31, 2026.
As of February 18, 2026, IP Strategy had 10,259,226 shares of its common stock outstanding. Assuming the full execution of buying back 1 million shares, this would constitute a nearly 10% reduction in the number of outstanding shares of the Company. The Company may acquire shares through open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions, including through a Rule 10b5-1 plan, at the discretion of management and on terms that management determines to be advisable.
IP Strategy is the largest independent owner of $IP tokens – the native token of the Story Layer 1 blockchain – with a current holding of 53.2 million tokens. The Company also recently began the transition from self-custodied validator work to third-party custodied validator work, a move which is expected to effectively double its related yield to 10% or more annually for 2026.
“The Board’s decision to authorize a share repurchase program reflects its belief that the market does not currently take into account the inherent value of our 53.2 million $IP tokens, nor the growth in higher-margin recurring revenue anticipated in 2026 from the transition to third-party custodied validator services,” said Justin Stiefel, Chief Executive Officer of IP Strategy. “When combined with the previously-announced streamlining and cost reduction plans for 2026, the implementation of a share repurchase program at this time reflects a very high degree of confidence in our long-term strategy and growth potential.”
About IP Strategy
IP Strategy Holdings, Inc. (Nasdaq: IPST) is the first Nasdaq-listed company to hold $IP tokens as a primary reserve asset and operate a validator for the Story Protocol. The Company provides public market investors broad exposure to the $80 trillion programmable intellectual property economy in a regulated equity format. IP Strategy’s treasury reserve of $IP tokens provides direct participation in the Story ecosystem, which enables on-chain registration, licensing, and monetization of intellectual property.
About Story
Story is the AI-native blockchain network powering the $IP token and making intellectual property programmable, traceable, and monetizable in real time. Backed by $136 million from a16z crypto, Polychain Capital, and Samsung Ventures, Story launched its mainnet in February 2025 and has rapidly become a leading infrastructure for tokenized intellectual property. Story allows creators and enterprises to turn media, data, and AI-generated content into legally enforceable digital assets with embedded rights, enabling automated licensing and new markets for intellectual property across AI and entertainment.
Forward-Looking Statements
This press release contains forward-looking statements, including statements made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements may be identified by words such as “aims,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “could,” “estimates,” “expects,” “forecasts,” “goal,” “intends,” “may,” “plans,” “possible,” “potential,” “seeks,” “will,” and variations of these words or similar expressions that are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Any such statements in this press release that are not statements of historical fact may be deemed to be forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, the Company’s adoption of a share repurchase program and the number and percentage of outstanding shares it may repurchase, the timing of the implementation of the Company’s share repurchase program, the shift to third-party custody of its $IP tokens, the expected increased yield from the Company’s validator operations, and the effectiveness of the Company’s proposed cost-saving measures.
Any forward-looking statements in this press release are based on IP Strategy’s current expectations, estimates and projections only as of the date of this release and are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially and adversely from those set forth in or implied by such forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, risks related to the volatility of the Company’s common stock and any correlation between the Company’s stock price and the price of $IP tokens, the legal, commercial, regulatory and technical uncertainty regarding digital assets generally, and expectations with respect to future performance and growth. These and other risks concerning IP Strategy’s programs and operations are described in additional detail in its registration statement on Form S-1 initially filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on August 26, 2025, as amended by Amendment No. 1 filed on October 16, 2025, Amendment No. 2 filed on December 12, 2025 and Amendment No. 3 filed on December 19, 2025, its latest annual report on Form 10-K, subsequent quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, and any other subsequent filings with the SEC. IP Strategy explicitly disclaims any obligation to update any forward-looking statements except to the extent required by law.
SECRET PARTNERSHIP BONUS for CryptoPotato readers: Use this link to register and unlock $1,500 in exclusive BingX Exchange rewards (limited time offer).
Crypto World
ZKsync and Phylax Launch Bank Stack: A Full-Scale Institutional Architecture Built on Ethereum
TLDR:
- Bank Stack operates across three integrated planes: blockchain platform, money and assets, and services and governance layer.
- Prividium enables institutions to run private, compliant transactions while inheriting Ethereum’s security and global settlement guarantees.
- Phylax adds pre-committed assertions and circuit breakers that block unsafe transactions before execution, not after settlement occurs.
- Platforms like Fireblocks already integrate with Prividium, letting banks reuse existing policy stacks for new institutional networks.
Bank Stack is emerging as a new institutional architecture for on-chain finance. ZKsync and Phylax have jointly introduced this framework, anchored on Ethereum and powered by Prividium.
The architecture is designed to address fragmented payment rails, rising compliance costs, and security risks. Financial institutions are no longer debating whether blockchain matters.
They are now choosing which architecture will run their settlement, liquidity, and balance sheet operations.
A Three-Layer Architecture Built for Institutions
Bank Stack operates across three integrated planes. The blockchain platform layer combines Ethereum with Prividium for private execution, compliance primitives, and interoperability.
Above that sits the money and assets layer, which covers tokenized deposits, stablecoins, and real-world assets. The third plane handles services and governance, including identity, custody, policy enforcement, and reporting.
Prividium serves as the institutional transaction layer at the foundation. It is a private, compliant, ZK-powered blockchain that remains anchored to Ethereum.
Institutions run confidential transaction environments while inheriting Ethereum’s security and global interoperability. Execution and data stay private, while ZK proofs posted to Ethereum provide integrity and finality.
ZKsync’s L1 interoperability solution connects any ZK Chain to Ethereum natively. Institutions no longer need to sacrifice governance, privacy, or execution environments for access to public market liquidity.
Prividiums become the first architecture where both can coexist. This removes one of the largest structural barriers to institutional blockchain adoption.
Compliance is built into the infrastructure surface rather than added on top. Prividiums embed permissioned participation, KYC/AML enforcement, and auditability directly into the system.
This shifts compliance from an operational burden to an architectural guarantee. Policy becomes enforceable in production, not just observable.
Circuit Breakers and Onchain Money Primitives
ZKsync shared via its official channel: “The Bank Stack is not a product. It is an institutional architecture for on-chain finance.” Phylax adds execution-time controls through pre-committed assertions and invariant enforcement during block building.
Transactions that violate safety conditions are excluded before execution. This prevents catastrophic states rather than detecting them after settlement.
Phylax also supports on-premises deployment, colocated with block production. There is no critical-path SaaS dependency and no custody of keys or funds.
Private assertions keep internal controls confidential inside an institution. Risk teams, underwriters, and regulators can use verifiable evidence for governance and coverage workflows.
The monetary foundation of Bank Stack includes tokenized deposits, fiat-backed stablecoins, and tokenized cash equivalents. These primitives compose with identity and policy controls.
Real-world assets such as tokenized securities, funds, and collateralized instruments are also supported. Platforms like Fireblocks already integrate with Prividium, allowing banks to reuse existing policy stacks.
Together, Ethereum provides global settlement, Prividium provides private execution, and Phylax provides deterministic operational controls.
Don’t Wait for a Crisis: Start Financial Planning & Money Conversation Today
Normandy apple tart
Winton Land H1 FY26 slides: revenue drops 60% amid settlement timing
-
Video4 days agoBitcoin: We’re Entering The Most Dangerous Phase
-
Tech5 days agoLuxman Enters Its Second Century with the D-100 SACD Player and L-100 Integrated Amplifier
-
Crypto World3 days agoCan XRP Price Successfully Register a 33% Breakout Past $2?
-
Sports3 days agoGB's semi-final hopes hang by thread after loss to Switzerland
-
Video10 hours agoXRP News: XRP Just Entered a New Phase (Almost Nobody Noticed)
-
Tech3 days agoThe Music Industry Enters Its Less-Is-More Era
-
Business3 days agoInfosys Limited (INFY) Discusses Tech Transitions and the Unique Aspects of the AI Era Transcript
-
Video3 days agoFinancial Statement Analysis | Complete Chapter Revision in 10 Minutes | Class 12 Board exam 2026
-
Entertainment2 days agoKunal Nayyar’s Secret Acts Of Kindness Sparks Online Discussion
-
Tech2 days agoRetro Rover: LT6502 Laptop Packs 8-Bit Power On The Go
-
Crypto World6 days agoBhutan’s Bitcoin sales enter third straight week with $6.7M BTC offload
-
Sports1 day agoClearing the boundary, crossing into history: J&K end 67-year wait, enter maiden Ranji Trophy final | Cricket News
-
Crypto World7 days agoKalshi enters $9B sports insurance market with new brokerage deal
-
Entertainment2 days agoDolores Catania Blasts Rob Rausch For Turning On ‘Housewives’ On ‘Traitors’
-
Business2 days agoTesla avoids California suspension after ending ‘autopilot’ marketing
-
NewsBeat5 days agoThe strange Cambridgeshire cemetery that forbade church rectors from entering
-
Crypto World2 days agoWLFI Crypto Surges Toward $0.12 as Whale Buys $2.75M Before Trump-Linked Forum
-
NewsBeat5 days agoMan dies after entering floodwater during police pursuit
-
Crypto World15 hours ago83% of Altcoins Enter Bear Trend as Liquidity Crunch Tightens Grip on Crypto Market
-
NewsBeat6 days agoUK construction company enters administration, records show