Conservative leadership contender Kemi Badenoch has said she will tone down her approach – after some of her colleagues suggested she can be rude.

Badenoch is widely seen as the favourite to replace Rishi Sunak as Tory leader when the results of the party membership vote are revealed on Saturday.

Earlier this month she was branded “disrespectful” by her rival Robert Jenrick for failing to set our her leadership policies more clearly.

Quizzed on a perception that she can seen as abrasive, Badenoch agreed she may need to take a more softly-softly approach.

“I think this is one of the manifestations that I don’t think I’m being rude,” she told the BBC’s Newscast podcast, as she put her demeanour down to “having a higher threshold for stress”.

“I just think I’m saying something that I wouldn’t mind hearing back, so I treat people how I treat myself and, you know, I’ve had even some of my advisors saying, why did you say that?

“I have to be mindful that I have a higher tolerance for things than others, and I think part of being a leader is being able to calibrate so that you can help manage other people.”

Asked if she would adopt a more softly-softly approach from now on, she said “yes, but that’s fine”, adding “I’m not perfect, you know, I’ve never said that I was perfect”.

She continued: “We keep wanting people who will give the perfect interview and have the perfect policies look perfect.

“There’s nobody like that. Everybody’s coming with pluses and minuses.”

Badenoch, who has done very few interviews with journalists compared to her rival Jenrick, also suggested there was a low turnout of Tory members voting for their new party leader.

“I’m doing more media this week specifically because people aren’t turning out to vote as much as we would have expected,” she said.

Chatting to Conservative members at events, Badenoch said, she would ask whether people had voted and be told “well, no, they haven’t. We’re going to wait till the last minute.”

But the former business secretary said she wasn’t worried Tory party members weren’t voting for her and claimed to be “sanguine” about the results.

“I don’t know if I will win,” she said.

“The bookies have me ahead, but I think it’s actually neck and neck.

“Robert could win. Anyone could win. Either of us could win.”

Perhaps party members didn’t like the choice they were presented with, Badenoch was asked.

She responded: “Well, there’s nothing I can do about that. That’s politics.”

The full interview will be available at 6am on Tuesday on BBC Sounds.

BBC

‘Fixing economy’

Commons Speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle has reprimanded Chancellor Rachel Reeves for giving interviews to reporters in the US about her upcoming Budget.

Parliamentary rules say major government announcements should be made to MPs in the Commons, ahead of journalists.

An exasperated Sir Lindsay said failing to do so was a “supreme discourtesy to the House” and he was “very, very disappointed” with Reeves.

Responding to the criticism, the prime minister’s spokesman said it was “entirely routine for government to make announcements in the run-up to Budgets and spending reviews”.

He added that Parliament would have “all the requisite time to scrutinise measures clearly”.

Reeves will deliver her first Budget on Wednesday in the Commons.

Last Friday, she outlined her plan to “change the way that we we measure debt” during a meeting of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) in Washington.

She explained she planned a technical change to loosen self-imposed limits on borrowing, to free up billions of pounds extra for infrastructure spending on projects such as roads, railways and hospitals.

The government has promised to get debt falling as share of the economy during the course of this parliament, rather than over a rolling five-year period.

Speaking in the Commons on Monday, Sir Lindsay said the policy changes “could hardly be described as a leak” when she had given on-the-record interviews, including to the BBC.

He said: “Ministers should expect to face proper, sustained scrutiny when these announcements are made to the elected members of this House and not the American news channels.”

This was because Reeves’ comments were major new policy announcements with “significant and wide-ranging implications for the government’s fiscal policy and for the public finances”, he added.

The Speaker said this was “totally unacceptable” and asked why Reeves expected MPs to wait “almost a week” simply to hear her repeat her announcements in her Budget statement.

MPs might be wondering, he added, “how they will get a seat on Wednesday. Well, to be honest the way it’s going you won’t need to – we’ll have all heard it.”

With Treasury minister Darren Jones making a statement to the House on “fiscal rules” later on Monday, the Speaker remarked: “Perhaps no coincidence.”

Alluding to previous breaches of parliamentary rules, Sir Lindsay noted that, when in opposition, Labour would complain about the previous Conservative government behaving in a similar manner, and demanded: “Get your acts together, all sides, treat Members with respect.”

Three Just Stop Oil activists have been banned from protesting in London ahead of their trial for allegedly throwing soup at two Vincent Van Gogh paintings at the National Gallery.

Mary Somerville, 77, Stephen Simpson, 71, and Phillipa Green, 24, are each charged with two counts of damaging the frames of Sunflowers 1889 and Sunflowers 1888 by dousing the artwork in soup.

The three appeared at Southwark Crown Court earlier and pleaded not guilty before being released on conditional bail.

The judge banned them from protest action within the boundary of the M25 until their trial – which is scheduled to begin in January 2026.

Mr Simpson, of Shipley, West Yorkshire, and Ms Somerville, of Bradford, West Yorkshire, attended court in person, while Ms Green, from Penryn in Cornwall, appeared by video link.

Their lawyer, Raj Chada, argued the ban was a “disproportional” infringement on their right to protest because London is “the seat of government”.

But Judge Alexander Milne said: “The application of the defendants’ right to protest is a relative one – and there seems to be a great deal of blurring between the exercise of that right and the commission of criminal offences.

“This court is not banning them from lawful protest anywhere else in the UK, but I will ban them from participating in any protest within the M25.”

The bus fare cap in England will be raised to £3 in the upcoming Budget, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has announced.

It is an increase on the current limit of £2 which was introduced under the previous Conservative government to help with the cost of living.

The existing cap was due to expire at the end of December.

Sir Keir said: “I do know how much this matters, particularly in rural communities where there is heavy reliance on buses.”

The new £3 cap will run until the end of 2025.

There had been speculation in recent days that the chancellor would announce in the Budget on Wednesday that the current cap would be scrapped.

This would have meant that some passengers faced a steep hike in fares following two years of help.

Around 3.4 million people in England use buses. The Confederation of Passenger Transport said raising the cap from £2 has avoided travellers facing a “cliff edge” at the end of this year.

But it said: “An increase to £3 will still present challenges for many passengers, particularly those who rely on buses as their primary means of affordable travel.”

Greenpeace said it was a “‘tough decision’ the government didn’t need to make”.

“It makes no political, economical or environmental sense whatsoever,” said Paul Morozzo, Greenpeace’s UK’s senior transport campaigner.

He said buses are a “critical lifeline to millions of people, particularly those on lower incomes”.

“A government that was truly prioritising the needs of the poorest in society would rethink this decision at the first opportunity,” he said.