Connect with us

Crypto World

Custodia CEO Caitlin Long Says Trump Family Crypto Ties Are Blocking the CLARITY Act in the Senate

Published

on

Nexo Partners with Bakkt for US Crypto Exchange and Yield Programs

TLDR:

  • Custodia CEO Caitlin Long called Trump family crypto ties the “big showstopper” blocking the CLARITY Act in the Senate.
  • Long described the bill’s Senate passage as a “coin flip,” with seven Democratic votes still needed to reach cloture.
  • Trump-linked projects like World Liberty Financial have made securing bipartisan Senate support significantly more difficult.
  • Long warned that without legislation, crypto regulations remain vulnerable to reversal by any future incoming administration.

Custodia Bank CEO Caitlin Long has identified Trump family crypto ties as a central obstacle to the CLARITY Act’s Senate passage.

Speaking at ETH Denver on Wednesday, Long said meme coins and ventures linked to President Donald Trump have eroded bipartisan support for the bill.

She described its chances as a “coin flip.” The legislation passed the House in July 2025 but remains stalled in the Senate over ethics concerns and stablecoin disputes.

Long Points to Trump-Linked Crypto as the “Big Showstopper”

Long did not hold back when asked about the bill’s Senate difficulties. She called the Trump family’s involvement in crypto “the big showstopper in the CLARITY Act.”

Projects like World Liberty Financial and Trump-associated meme coins have drawn sharp Democratic opposition. That opposition has made the 60-vote cloture threshold increasingly difficult to reach.

Advertisement

Senator Elizabeth Warren has been among the most outspoken critics of Trump’s crypto activities. Long noted that even Senator Cynthia Lummis, a leading crypto advocate, admitted the controversy has complicated her efforts. “It created controversy,” Long told Decrypt.

“Lummis herself has said it made her job harder.” The ethics dimension has shifted the debate away from policy and toward politics.

Seven Democratic votes are needed to advance the bill past the Senate cloture threshold. So far, that number has proven hard to secure. Long acknowledged that an agreement satisfying both Congress and the White House remains possible.

“There is a possibility they reach an agreement on something the White House can live with, and Congress is comfortable with,” she said, “but they’ve got to be able to get the cloture vote.”

Advertisement

Meanwhile, negotiations are still active. White House officials, lenders, and the Crypto Council for Innovation met on Thursday to discuss stablecoin reward provisions.

That issue has emerged as another major sticking point alongside the ethics controversy. Both problems must be resolved for the bill to move forward.

Long Warns Against Relying on Rulemaking Over Legislation

Beyond the political obstacles, Long raised a broader concern about regulatory durability. She warned that rules established through agency rulemaking carry no permanent weight.

“When a new administration comes in, those rules can be reversed through new rule-making,” she said. A statutory framework, by contrast, requires a much harder process to undo.

Advertisement

Passing the CLARITY Act would lock in a regulatory structure that is far more resistant to political change. “If Congress puts it in statute, it doesn’t mean it can’t be changed,” Long said.

“It’s just a lot harder to change.” That durability is precisely why she believes congressional action matters more than regulatory guidance alone.

Long also addressed the current market downturn with measured perspective. She noted that a 50% drawdown is familiar to anyone who has been in crypto for years. “Those of us who’ve been around for a long time, a 50% drawdown is nothing,” she said.

Bear markets, she added, are an opportunity to build knowledge, with her consistent advice remaining the same: “Bear markets are the best time to get self-educated.”

Advertisement

 

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Crypto World

Crypto Treasury Execs Say Basel Risk Weights for Crypto Need Updating

Published

on

Banking, Banks, Basel

Crypto treasury executives are calling on the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS), an international banking regulatory body, to revise the 1,250% risk weight for Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies under the Basel III framework.

The 1,250% capital requirement means that banks must back any Bitcoin (BTC) on their balance sheets at a 1:1 ratio with approved collateral, making BTC holding more costly than other asset classes.

For comparison, cash, physical gold and government debt carry a 0% risk weight under the Basel III framework.

Banking, Banks, Basel
Basel III risk weights for different asset classes held by banking institutions. Source: Jeff Walton

“If the US wants to be the ‘crypto capital’ of the world, the banking regulations need to change. Risk is mispriced,” Jeff Walton, chief risk officer at Bitcoin treasury company Strive, wrote on X.

The capital rules under Basel III discourage banks from holding BTC and crypto because of the relatively high cost of holding digital assets vis-a-vis reserve requirements, which lowers a bank’s return on equity, a critical metric for bank profitability, according to Chris Perkins, president of investment company CoinFund.

Advertisement

Related: Banks can’t seem to service crypto, even as it goes mainstream

Basel responds to growing backlash and pressure from the crypto industry

The Basel Committee proposed the current risk weightings in 2021, placing BTC and other cryptocurrencies in the highest risk category and imposing a 1,250% risk weight on digital assets.

In 2024, the committee finalized the capital requirements outlined in the 2021 proposal, which drew heavy backlash from the crypto industry.

Banking, Banks, Basel
Phong Le, CEO of Strategy, the largest Bitcoin treasury company, urges reform of the current Basel III crypto risk weighting. Source: Phong Le

The current rules represent a “different type of chokepoint” than the overt debanking of crypto companies in what some industry insiders dubbed Operation Chokepoint 2.0, Perkins told Cointelegraph in August 2025.

“It’s a very nuanced way of suppressing activity by making it so expensive for the bank to do those activities,” Perkins said.

Advertisement

In October 2025, reports emerged that the committee was considering easing the capital requirements for digital assets in response to the surge in the stablecoin market cap, which is nearing $300 billion, according to data from RWA.xyz. 

The following month, Erik Thedéen, chair of the BCBS, said the international banking regulator may need a “different approach” to the 1,250% risk weight for cryptocurrencies, signaling a potential change in reserve requirements.

Magazine: Crypto wanted to overthrow banks, now it’s becoming them in the stablecoin fight