Connect with us

News

Independent Journalism: Countering Corporate Media Propaganda

Published

on

Independent Journalism: Countering Corporate Media Propaganda

The Project Censored Show

The Official Project Censored Show

The Importance of Independent Journalism in Fighting Censorship and Countering Corporate Media Propaganda



Loading




Advertisement


/

Advertisement
Advertisement

In the first segment, Mickey speaks with Professor Raza Rumi, director of the Park Center for Independent Media at Ithaca College, who explains the declining relevance of “legacy” media and the essential work of a truly independent press. They go on to talk about media censorship and propaganda around Israel and Hamas and what appears to be an unfolding genocide Gaza. They also discuss the coming 16th Annual Izzy Awards at the Park Center (named after the late great muckraking reporter, I.F. Stone), which honors the best independent journalism in the public interest. Later in the program, Mickey and Eleanor deconstruct how establishment media are slanting Gaza coverage in Israel’s favor, including at the New York Times, which has gone so far as to control language and censor their own journalists to further a their bias while demonizing those who offer counter narratives based on transparently sourced factual reports from the region.

Notes:
Raza Rumi is Director of the Park Center for Independent Media at Ithaca College in upstate New York, and has held a variety of other academic appointments in his career, including at Cornell University and the Roosevelt House Public Policy Institute at Hunter College.

 

Video of the Interview with Raza Rumi

Advertisement

 

Below is a Rough Transcript of the Interview with Raza Rumi

Mickey Huff: Welcome to the Project Censored Show on Pacifica Radio. I’m your host, Mickey Huff. Today, in this segment of the program, we are honored to welcome back to the program, Raza Rumi, a policy analyst, journalist, and author. He is Distinguished Lecturer at Roosevelt University house Public Policy Institute at Hunter College, New York.

He is the director of the Park Center for Independent Media and teaches in the journalism department. He is also faculty at Brooks School of Public Policy at Cornell University. During the 2015 through 2017 years, Raza was a scholar in residence at Ithaca College and taught courses in journalism and writing departments, as well as the Gallatin School of Individualized Study, New York University.

Raza has been a fellow at the New America Foundation, United States Institute of Peace, and a member of the think tank at Laboratory for Global Performance and Politics at Georgetown University. Raza Rumi, welcome back to the Project Censored Show.

Advertisement

Raza Rumi: Thank you. Thank you. It’s a pleasure. Always.

Mickey Huff: it’s always wonderful to catch up with you.

And again, we, Project Censored, of course, are acutely aware of the very fine work you do at the Park Center for Independent Media at Ithaca College. one of the many reasons we, know about you, your work, and of course, the, Park Center at Ithaca founded by you. the great Jeff Cohen from Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting.

You’re the second director, there over the years. You do something every year that I think is very interesting to our audience, and it is the Izzy Awards, named after the late, great, independent, muckraking journalist, I. F. Stone. and Project Censored’s been around long enough, since 1976, that We actually have a blurb from IF Stone supporting the work of Project Censored back in the day.

Advertisement

We of course are big fans of the things you’re doing. Raza, could you tell our audience, just briefly, what exactly is the Izzy Awards? This is the 16th year that you’ve all been doing those awards, and you recently announced, this year’s winners. There’s going to be a ceremony at the end of April, and of course this program is pre recorded, but We’ll be airing this show right around May 3rd, which is International Press Freedom Day.

So you and I have a lot to talk about, in this segment. Raza Rumi, the Izzies.

Raza Rumi: Yes, thank you so much. the Izzy Award, started, as you mentioned, in, 2008, that is when the Park Center for Independent Media was set up at Ithaca College. One of its kind, perhaps the only such media In an academic space across the nation, which directly and exclusively, focuses on non corporate, independent nonprofit media and media streams, that of course includes, publications, includes, documentary, And other forms of, communications, but in, in largely in the non corporate zone, because as, like the world media, the American media ecosystem is corporate controlled.

a few handful of corporations own what 90 percent of media, millions consume here and overseas. so the idea is to honor and, recognize the important work that independent journalists do despite so many hurdles, financial difficulties, small budgets, et cetera. So each year we have been, of all, giving this award to, to those who have made an impact and, It includes really, remarkable names like Amy Goodman, for example, of Democracy Now.

Advertisement

it includes many journalists from, The Intercept, from Mother Jones, from The Nation, from Inside Climate News, groundbreaking stuff, which people don’t find on, Washington Post or New York Times or CNN. And, So how do we get it out? And the award is also a way to promote this kind of media.

So that’s in brief what the purpose is. But, because it is set up in a, college, in an academic space. So the idea is also to demonstrate to students. in the communication school, in journalism department, as to this is also a possible career choice. You don’t have to join Fox News the moment you graduate, or your local corporate channel, peddling, the interests of a few over the many, you can choose a path.

And, I think that’s what, What we have successfully done over the years, at the Center for Independent Media at Ithaca College.

Mickey Huff: Yeah, absolutely. Raza, this year’s, this year’s winners you recently announced, and again, at Project Censored, there was such overlap, with the missions and, the interest that you all have at the Park Center.

Advertisement

we honor independent media every year with our top under reported stories, meaning that these people do amazing work, these organizations do fantastic work, and like you just said, it’s often, under adverse situations, these are often underfunded, these are really often labor of love kind of organizations, non profits, that’s not to say that there’s no money or no career path there, but It’s not the easy way to do things, Raza Rumi, and I particularly am struck by the educational components.

Again, at Project Censored, we’re strong, strong, promoters of critical media literacy education, and the fact that this is housed at a college where you are teaching students about the importance of independent journalism, this is a stellar and fantastic thing. And this year, of course, the winners are no strangers to us here at Project Censored.

the people, the good folks over at Indies Times out of Chicago, amazing labor reporting. I know you have a special mention this year, recognition for the coverage of Democracy Now. this is, again, the kind of work that you’re, putting up as Journalism in the public interest, right? So could you talk a little bit, maybe just briefly, can you talk a little bit about, just how you, I know you accept nominations and so forth, but could you talk a little bit more about why these groups and these individuals are doing such important work?

could you tell us a little bit maybe about some of this year’s winners? just so our listeners can just what you said a moment ago, just so they can go and become more familiar. And if they’re not familiar with these sources, they really should be.

Advertisement

Raza Rumi: Yeah, certainly. Thank you as you also, mentioned, this is a labor of love.

A lot of these journalists and small outlets, are struggling all the time, they’re keeping the flame, going. And that is what we are really interested in because often what we see is that some of these stories. have a huge impact, ProPublica, for example, has become a leading, leading voice.

it is now cited before Congress testimonies and Senate hearings. it’s not even a publish, magazine, it’s a website. But look at its impact. And that is something that we, we really look for. For every year when we get countless dozens and dozens of nominations, and then we have a panel of judges and me who go through and plow through lots of material.

We don’t generally, do books, though. We also get many good submissions on books primarily because, what we want to do is, look at some of the, articles and podcasts and documentaries, which may, have a more public sort of appeal and, and engagement. So, this year in these times, as you noted, we recognize the outlet because they have done some stellar reporting, during 2023, in, and the focus was on the lives, livelihoods.

Advertisement

Struggles and voices of working class people, from the meatpacking laborers in Iowa to coal miners in Appalachia, poor women in Mississippi and the employees of a high end, of high end resorts in Montana and Colorado who can’t afford housing anywhere near their jobs. And, these are the stories you don’t hear on media.

CNN or New York Times hardly Talk about these issues, and so who is going to talk about people and working people, especially in america where we know that, high inflation and rising inequality And you know declining incomes has put the working people in a real tight spot and the purpose of independent journalism has to be give voice to these, voiceless, groups and they are large groups in, in rural and semi-urban areas of America.

that’s the other problem with the media bias here. and Mickey, it’s well known. I’m just repeating that, it is so much, focused on big cities, like on the, and, especially on the east coast and the West Coast, and there’s a clear bias, that’s the universe.

Exactly. So New York is the universe. that’s an entire America. What about the middle America, Southern America, all these other places where people are struggling. So that’s why in these times was recognized. And then we also, gave this award to, to, remarkable reporters in Chicago, one from invisible Institute and the who’ve done this seven part investigative series called Missing in Chicago, basically where they’ve exposed, the mismanagement, mishandling of Chicago’s police on, of missing person cases.

Advertisement

And surprise, Most of these, affect black women and girls. they, these reporters were plowed through so much material. there were 30, 000 complaints remove filler wordsed, which identified buried patterns of misconduct and marginalized homelessness, substance abuse, mental disorder, health disorders.

And, and they looked at how, basically the police was mis, Completely mismanaging these. And, certainly, this had a lot of impact within, the Chicago area and within the communities. And so we thought that this was something that ought to be given its due recognition. And then to avoid, the nation has, Yes.

In Palestine, Mohammed el-Kurd. Yes. who’s basically written these, lyrical and powerful essays in the nation, basically about the Palestinians, people’s right to speak for themselves, and how Western media rarely amplifies their voices and actually attributes their voices to them, puts words in their mouth and doesn’t really talk about, it’s a, so it’s a larger pattern of dehumanization of the Palestinian people.

And that is why democracy now also gets a special mention, because they have consistently since October, 2023 reported on what was happening in Gaza, in particular, in Gaza. the kind of blockades and the civilian, targets, Geneva conventions, international humanitarian law, international law of the armed conflict prohibits, targeting civilians and civilian installations like hospitals, schools.

Advertisement

But we have seen everything has happened in broad daylight in front of our eyes. And for, months and weeks, the mainstream corporate media, especially in the U S was denying it. Absolutely. was only putting across the, official version by the Israeli military or the government and democracy now, as as always, they’re brave, to, put out, the version of people who live in that region.

Mickey Huff: Yeah, and actually, it’s, you can learn more at parkindymedia. org, and the list is there. Mohamed El Kurd from The Nation, whom you were just speaking about, is the first Palestine correspondent in The Nation’s 160 year history as an independent magazine. Very significant to point that out. as well, and you link to the pieces here, the pieces that you were just speaking about, and Raza Rumi, that obviously opens up, the topic of, Gaza and media coverage of Gaza, and that’s certainly something that, you and I are going to talk about.

I wanted to, however briefly, just pause to remind our listeners that you’re tuned to the Project Censored Show on Pacifica Radio. I’m your host, Mickey Huff, and we are speaking to the director of the Park Center for Independent Media at Ithaca College. We are speaking with Professor Raza Rumi. We will be back and continue our conversation after this brief musical break.

Stay with us. Welcome back to the Project Censored Show on Pacifica Radio. I’m your host, Mickey Huff. In this segment today, we are honored to welcome back to the program, Raza Rumi. Raza is the second director at the Park Center for Independent Media. He’s a distinguished lecturer at Roosevelt House Library Institute, he’s an author. He has done many things, and you can check out his work. Of course, you can learn more at the Park Center site. It’s parkindymedia. org. Also teaching, again, as I mentioned, at Hunter College in New York now. Also has taught at Cornell. And many other places. Raza Rumi, you were just telling us about the very important Izzy Awards that really call attention to the important voices in independent media.

Advertisement

You were just talking about some of the winners, that were just announced and is going to be celebrated at the end of April. Gaza, the issue, and you and I have talked in between. about some of the just absolute atrocious media coverage that’s gone on in the United States in particular in the West, and so let’s talk about that just briefly. I know you mentioned it before the break. I want to talk a little bit about just the absolutely shameful and disgusting kind of coverage that we’ve been seeing, but. I also want to talk to you about and hear your views about how you maybe see some of that coverage changing, in the West.

It’s painful to watch places like the New York Times try to, do mental gymnastics and bend over backwards to just not state the obvious, but let’s, talk a little bit about this. you well know, as you just talked about the amazing work, that other independent journalists are doing, especially Mohamed Elkurd.

we can certainly talk about, others, whether it’s Electronic Intifada, Mint Press News, Rania Khalek. There’s a lot of people that are covering what’s going on, in Gaza. But as you pointed out, they’re not at the New York Times, they’re not at the BBC, they’re not on CNN.

these places. So your assessment. what’s your assessment of the Western media coverage? And have you seen a shift at all?

Advertisement

Raza Rumi: Yeah, certainly I think that is something that merits, I mean we can go on and on for hours, but I think The problem, here is that we know that the Western media and corporate media in particular is very much a veritable arm of the military industrial complex.

Now, deliberately, wittingly, unwittingly, I don’t want to sound like a conspiracy theorist. Maybe it’s, maybe it just so happens that, rich people have common interests and common friends in DC or wherever, it, could very well be that, right. Yeah, it could be you know just to give them a little benefit of the doubt but you know So so I guess we can see that, Okay, october 7th was definitely a terrible day in our recent history You know what hamas did to israeli civilians can certainly not be condoned by any means I know there are many arguments and theories about that and i’m not going to go into that because I think attacking and hurting civilians or taking them as hostages is certainly not the done thing.

It doesn’t solve anything. It only aggravates the issue. Having said that, the disproportionate response by Israeli government and the military, on, an already occupied and subjugated and, ill treated people is what makes it worse. And the media itself Instead of looking at the larger picture, the history of why Palestinians are there, why does Hamas exist in the first place?

why, why is Hamas getting that kind of support? Okay. Not by, not all Palestinians, but a sizable number of why do people, support them? And I think it, it hasn’t really gone into those questions. because it wants to highlight the, and, regurgitate the question. The strong security relationship that the Israeli government and the American government have.

Advertisement

And that is what has been narrated through and through months, in the corporate media. And so much so that when the hospitals were attacked, justifications were made as to their underground terrorist cells, our schools were being attacked, aid workers, journalists, more than a hundred, who kills aid workers?

Humanitarian workers. I know we, I know human beings are, have a terrible history and I know there’s been lots of barbarity, but we are in the 21st century. If you haven’t learned that from our history and from what has happened in the past centuries, then obviously we have not learned enough.

and and that is where, so first of all, I think it has to do with the dehumanization of Palestinian people and civilians. Because that is something that is, if we are concerned about Israeli civilians, then Palestinian lives have an equal value and an equal measure of reporting and coverage, and, to inform the publics, both in the United States and around the world.

But, in the U. S., it’s even more important because billions of dollars from the U. S. taxpayers can go to Israel. Now, who is the government supporting? And that is what a lot of activists and young people say in America, that, it is our tax dollars. And certainly we have a right to check and ask the government.

Advertisement

So, with this one sided, biased reporting, the parallel was, social media, venues like TikTok, venues like Instagram that were presenting an alternative to. picture of what was going on and actually, citing voices from Palestine. So Palestinian content makers, ordinary people, they’re vloggers, they’re young people on TikTok until the internet was shut down, or later on, they moved to a secure place, they were reporting in a far better way. And that led to this outrage, this historic movement. on campuses on, in almost every city of America. And now today the polls show that majority of Americans, oppose this war in Gaza and not due to the corporate media, all the citizen journalism is remarkable I know I’m not doing a blanket sort of eulogy of social media because their problems of disinformation. Yes. Lack of fact checking. Misinformation. Propaganda. Yes, it’s there. And Israelis have also been doing that. we saw Israeli Tiktokers making fun of Palestinian people in siege, you know that they don’t have water.

How would they put on makeup or how would they cook food? Oh, they’re starving, they were actually making fun of that and that really hurts you because obviously I can’t blame them. They are victims of propaganda within Israel as well about the Palestinian people and about the whole conflict, because often young people, just like in America, a large number of people are kept ignorant or misinformed or, subjected to propaganda.

for the imperatives of a national security state. And I think that is what is happening in Israel as well. Because, you have to create a very obedient, a very pliant public. And media is the tool. Media is the tool. Media, cinema, mainstream corporate, communications are the tool to keep masses in the dark.

Mickey Huff: Absolutely. And, last month we had a opportunity to do a great event with Roger Stahl and Robin Anderson. Fatuma Saad and Manar Adlai on, Roger’s great remove filler wordsm, Theaters of War, that talks about how the CIA and the Pentagon have long controlled these narratives through entertainment, quote, unquote, right, invotainment, mis again, literally script writing censoring the whole nine yards, the hundreds and thousands and then thousands of shows and so forth.

Advertisement

So it’s not just the corporate media. It’s all these, this information ecosystem. And I find it very interesting, Raza, that around the same time we see this decline in trust. in the legacy press in the US and we see these statistics as you said going from full scale support for what was happening with Israel to now I’m a majority of Americans have said no, this is not something that we approve of this is not something that we support this is not who we are.

At the same time, we see the Biden administration trying to get rid of TikTok or ban TikTok, because it’s allegedly a foreign company, it’s foreign propaganda, but don’t worry about Meta or Google or Alphabet or Facebook or Fang or the rest of the big tech companies, right? It’s just TikTok.

Raza Rumi, your thoughts on that.

Raza Rumi: No, that is again, that, that was remarkable, in a country which is, of course, world’s oldest company. at least in this part of the world, that’s part of the globe, but, to muzzle, a social media platform used by so many millions.

Advertisement

Yeah. And especially young people was remarkable. It was, of course, couched in this national security excuses that, the Chinese are planting and so on. Spying on people or blah, blah, blah. And yes, if they are, who, the US has the best, techies, in the world. who can check this app as to what kind of data, et cetera, and you can put on those remove filler wordsters.

But that outright idea to censor and muzzle this platform was very much related to what was happening on Gaza. And, I’ll tell you, Mickey, what really, upsets me, you talked about cinema. So I remember, once I, I used to teach a course at Indica college and, we looked at film and, I don’t know if you remember this Hollywood blockbuster, American sniper.

Mickey Huff: Oh yes.

Raza Rumi: that, that talks about this, the PTSD of a soldier, of a veteran from Iraq casually brushes aside all the people that he shot and all the. All the tragedy that, fell upon Iraqi people, they, were, they were remarkable for the lack of presence in that remove filler wordsm. And that remove filler wordsm was about Iraq war.

Advertisement

about, about conflict and that, and the toll that it takes. And similarly, A lot of these cinematic productions, over time have inculcated this necessity of war. Now look at the treatment of the Ukrainian people as opposed to the Palestinians, right? Yes. Yes, absolutely. So I don’t want to go deeper into that, because Ukraine has been targeted by Russia, which in the cold war mindset, which persists in America, refuses to go away.

Russia, still the enemy Russia. Is as is nothing compared to the U. S. it is a country with a economy almost the size of Spain far inferior to the US, the Russian military is not a superior military machine to The U. S military spending and the machine is far larger, but Russia is blown and created as such a huge threat.

And yes, I’m not denying that Russians would be up to no good. They will do that. And we know Putin is a dictator and a, yes, but these threats are amplified because you have to create for the imperatives of a national security state. And, similarly, for the continued military assistance to Israel and all the money that, is given out by both Democrats and Republicans.

There’s a bipartisan consensus when it comes to the killing of Palestinian people. And, so obviously, the reaction by the Biden administration and the Congress has been, how do we fix this? Fix this problem. Our young kids are being misled by all these TikToks and these videos. Oh my God, what a threat to national security.

Advertisement

But, I also would like to add that I think what has also happened is that the Democrats have been badly exposed. we knew. We knew that already. we knew from Obama years from earlier, but in this particular conflict, President Biden’s, conduct and his, vacillation, his refusal to smell the coffee.

His refusal to acknowledge the public opinion has been a major blow, to, for them, Biden will suffer in this election. Uncommitted.

Mickey Huff: The primaries, people uncommitted voting in these, states. Over 20 percent in places like Minnesota, D. C. just did it. it’s a trend and they’re pretending it’s not connected, but it’s directly connected to the Gaza policy.

Raza Rumi: Oh, absolutely. And so they’re uncommitted, but it is also terrible for the United States role as a, it calls itself as the sort of global leader in democracy and someone, invested in the idea of exporting democracy and democratic values and American values and human rights, et cetera.

Advertisement

All of that has been exposed. in the academia, which is the so called bastion of free speech, intellectual freedom, we have seen how professors have been targeted. There’s a, they’ve been suspended.

Mickey Huff: Yes.

Raza Rumi: Students in Ivy League, Columbia University was suspended. three of them. Can you imagine for the, for holding a particular set of views?

Mickey Huff: Oh my God. And students are being attacked all over and just happened in sleepy Claremont at Pomona College. They just called in what looked like a military occupation of the place. It’s unhinged, man. and again, yeah,

Advertisement

Raza Rumi: people are scared, and so that has been deeply disappointing for me, Mickey, because, I moved, I moved into academia nearly a decade ago because I thought, I’m in the U.S. This is the great intellectual space.

I would have all the freedom in the world. And so this is, I’ve realized, no, that was a. a mirage because there’s freedom on everything except Palestine or perhaps except the military industrial complex to to have it exposed directly this has been really sobering you know the political elites the corporate media elites and the higher education, again, corporate higher education elite,

Mickey Huff: neoliberal managerial class.

Raza Rumi: Yes, all the classes get into the class. They all seem to be invested into this violent project in the Middle East and the people hats off to young people of America Who are really challenging that and resisting that and hats off to organizations like jewish Voices for peace and other groups who said not in our name.

Advertisement

Don’t do this killing. Don’t violate all laws, international laws and, ethics, that keep the, world going. in our name. So I think what has happened is that, the, the corporate media. in the last six or seven months has further fallen from grace. It already had been losing its credibility, but I think after this experience, it’s, they will find themselves in a, greater, crisis.

Mickey Huff: Yeah. We’re even seeing that at NPR, where they’re a voice of conscious comes out and says, look, we haven’t been covering issues well, and the public has caught on. Right. And the public realizes that we’re not really reporting in the interest of people. And that’s really part of the crisis of journalism.

And we’re back to independent media, the independent muckraking press, which really, it really, I think it’s leading the where it’s where the, so called industry part of the problem there, but that’s really where journalism is thriving. And that’s where these stories matter so much.

so much. We’ve seen the New York Times literally producing fake news, bogus stories, and repeating them over and over, whether it’s beheadings or rapes or other things. it’s right, it’s WMD level, deception and chicanery going back over 20 years at the Times. And in Israel, we see similar issues.

Advertisement

They’re banning news outlets.

Raza Rumi: Oh, yeah. Oh, yeah, absolutely. I mean about the, about the role of Indy Press, I was startled. I didn’t really know. Puerto Rico, for example, has only one pediatric, heart surgeon. it’s, I thought it was part of America.

one for the entire region. and of course the nation reported on it. I didn’t read it in the Washington Post, because they don’t care who, why Puerto Rico, they’re not going to buy all the goods that we sell and all the advertising that we have to do. so, a lot of important stories, and that is why we need the independent media and a bigger and more a more, financially stronger Independent media in this country

Mickey Huff: Raza Rumi. There’s obviously a connection here, too I know you do a lot around human rights. And of course, we’re actually talking about critical media literacy the knowing of like why why wouldn’t the Washington Post right? About some of these stories or why what does compel them to do the things they do write about or publish.

Advertisement

And again, that’s the media literacy, the critical media literacy angle, looking at the owners, the advertisers, right? Looking at all the other forces. You mentioned the commercial forces, right? Just moments ago. Those are very real. And when I was saying that we’re talking about a quote, news industry, and I quit, but that’s part of the problem is that it is the privately owned for profit model that’s really failed the public interest at large Bob failed the public repeatedly.

And it’s failing Gazans. It’s failing Palestinians. It’s failing. It’s failing on some of the most fundamental and important issues of our time around war and peace, life and death, and these are no laughing matters. And we have all these resources and things at our disposal, and it is further disgusting to see it used to promote more violence, to promote disinformation, and to actually encourage censorship and try to silence the voices of others.

Raza Rumi, the work you do at the Park Center, is so important. We have a couple minutes left here. I just wanted to give you the last words to talk about any of the other things that you’d like to bring up or promote anything or actually also remind people where they can find you or where they can follow the important work that you do.

Raza Rumi: Oh, thank you so much. as you already mentioned parkindymedia. org is our website of the Park Center for Independent Media. You can find out about our events, all the Izzy award and other things that we do on that site. And, my personal website is razarumi. com, R A Z A R U M I. com, where my writings are archived.

Advertisement

I try and keep up. Sometimes it takes a bit of effort to update that. But, as you mentioned, Mickey, I moved to New York City now last, last fall, and I’m now, teaching at the Public Policy and Human Rights program, at Hunter College. And, certainly this is a transition, I would now be engaged, come this fall with independent media.

I’ll of course stay engaged in a different form. I’ll probably write more and less of administration or management. But, but I do want to highlight, we talked about the problems of, independent media. So I think, many, academics like Victor Picard, who’s also one of our judges.

Is he, they have been proposing an alternative model to the for profit media. And even because, even the for profit media is in decline and it’s seriously endangered. we saw what happened with BuzzFeed. We saw the layoffs at Washington Post. LA Times, we read them.

we read that all the time and what is now required is a fundamental media reform we also need a Larger public media because the United States Is among the advanced countries of the world advanced in terms of income and wealth is that is a country that spends the least on public media? Canada spends more than the US even though it’s lower the Scandinavian countries, western European countries, even some of the developing countries spend more on public media. And that is perhaps what we need because we have this corporate, corporatization, but we also have the drying out of local journalism where counties are turning into news deserts with no local publication, they are going out and that also then helps these big tech companies spread misinformation or doctored truths, through their platforms like, like Meta and X now also right winger now. I, it doesn’t do, it doesn’t really bode well for democracy in the U S. And so that is why media literacy has to emerge as a kind of a central pillar of education at the high schools.

Advertisement

I would say earlier, but perhaps high school, you have to start from that level and then should be a mandatory component of journalism curricula, of communications curricula, and perhaps all liberal arts curriculum. And I think we need to make a concerted effort and bring in, the curricular designers and all the other.

But, that’s the other problem that, dealing with sometimes with the academics is also a tough call because, they think they already know everything and they’re more than, and they know more than you because, they, they have three PhDs or two, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera.

but what they need to realize is that, what is happening, we as practitioners of media know what is happening because we on a daily basis deal with readers. We look at the comments, we engage with them. We engage with writers and editors and reporters and citizen journalists. And so we see this gaping hole, this gaping huge need, need for media literacy, better education.

And I think that is, that should be our, future agenda.

Advertisement

Mickey Huff: I could not agree more. Raza Rumi, of course at Project Censored, we’ve done the media and me one of the very few if only, critical media literacy books for young people, written for young people. There’s only five states in the U. S. That are mandating media literacy education at this juncture, which is paltry.

California just came online, but they’re, they just don’t have the plans that and the curriculum is not all even and all equal. NATO has gotten into the media literacy game. Corporations are all into the media literacy game, but that’s not critical media literacy. It’s more advocacy for the same kind of top down managed news propaganda.

That’s really that permeates that landscape. So Raza Rumi as ever, it’s always fantastic to talk to you and catch up. And I’m very happy that you talked about the important work of people like Victor Pikard, the need for a strong public media, right? We, the hedge fund newspapers and the news deserts that we see are certainly not good for us.

And here we are in another election year. It’s like a really bad rerun of, of a tragic comedy or something, the same two older candidates that nobody can really not many people, a majority of people don’t like either of the major corporate party candidates. The third parties have been derailed because of the way the system operates, right?

Advertisement

The way it keeps out voices. So I’m with you. I really think that media literacy education, critical media literacy education is really a serious core of the solution. You called it a pillar. And I can’t think of a better term for it, Raza. So again, as ever, your wit, your wisdom and your brilliant observations are always welcome here at the Project Censored Show.

Can’t thank you enough for the important work that you do. Raza Rumi is a policy analyst, journalist and author, a distinguished lecturer at Roosevelt House Public Policy Institute, Hunter College, also the director of the Park Center for Independent Media. Raza Rumi, as ever, thanks for joining us on the Project Censored Show today.

Raza Rumi: Thank you, Mickey

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

News

Man, 32, arrested on suspicion of murder after man, 25, stabbed to death in Bristol street

Published

on

Man, 32, arrested on suspicion of murder after man, 25, stabbed to death in Bristol street

A MAN has been arrested on suspicion of murder after the death of a man in Bristol, police have said.

Avon and Somerset Police arrested a 32-year-old man in the Eastville area of the city at about 5.45pm on Saturday following a manhunt.

Crime scene investigation on Stapleton Road area of Bristol, following the fatal stabbing

3

Crime scene investigation on Stapleton Road area of Bristol, following the fatal stabbingCredit: SWNS
Avon and Somerset Police arrested a 32-year-old man

3

Advertisement
Avon and Somerset Police arrested a 32-year-old manCredit: SWNS
Police in the area began administering first aid and called for backup

3

Police in the area began administering first aid and called for backupCredit: SWNS

He remains in custody.

The arrest follows the death of a 25-year-old man who was stabbed on Stapleton Road at about 5.40pm on Friday.

Police in the area began administering first aid and called for backup.

Advertisement

The man received emergency care from paramedics at the scene before being taken to Southmead Hospital, but was pronounced dead later that evening.

A murder investigation was launched, with extensive searches of the Bristol on Friday night, with assistance from the National Police Air Service.

Police have also arrested two women, aged 36 and 47, on suspicion of assisting an offender. They both remain in custody.

A man who was arrested on suspicion of the same offence on Friday has been released with no further action.

Advertisement

Detective Inspector Mark Newbury, senior investigating officer, said: “The arrest of a man this afternoon on suspicion of murder marks a significant development in our investigation.

“He is in custody and will be interviewed by detectives from our major crime investigation team in due course.

“We are in contact with close friends of the man who died and have updated them this evening of this news and continue to offer them support.

“Stapleton Road was reopened this afternoon following the conclusion of our inquiries at the scene and we are grateful for the public’s understanding while that necessary work was undertaken.

Advertisement

“The community can continue to expect to see an increased high-visibility police presence over the next few days as we look to help anyone who has concerns following this tragic incident.”

Bristol Commander, Superintendent Mark Runacres, said earlier on Saturday: “There is no place for violence on Bristol’s streets and we are committed to working with partners around this issue.

“We want the community to understand that we are here to help them.

“We understand such tragic news is hugely distressing and therefore there will be an increased police presence in the area over the coming days with more patrols carried out, not because we’re aware of any increased risk, but because we want to make sure you can approach us to raise any concerns.

Advertisement

“Stapleton Road is a busy place at the best of times, especially early on a Friday evening.

“We are grateful to those people who have already spoken to police and told us what they saw and we’d urge anyone else with information to please contact us as soon as possible.”

Mr Runacres said he was aware that people were filming in the area, and they would like to hear from anyone with footage relevant to their investigation.

However, he asked that out of respect for the man’s friends and family no insensitive footage is published on social media.

Advertisement

Anyone with information is asked to call 101 and quote reference number 5224248976.

Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Israel deals Hizbollah its worst ever week

Published

on

Two days after a devastating sabotage operation stunned Hizbollah and plunged its communications network into chaos, one of the militant group’s most senior military leaders called a clandestine meeting of at least 15 elite officers in southern Beirut.

By nightfall the men were dead, killed along with at least 10 civilians in an Israeli air strike on Friday that targeted the residential building in Hizbollah’s heartland where they were meeting in an underground room. The attack dealt a crushing blow that rounded off probably the most calamitous week in the Iranian-backed, Lebanese group’s 40-year history. 

Coming so soon after suspected back-to-back Israeli attacks on Tuesday and Wednesday that caused thousands of Hizbollah’s pagers and walkie-talkies to explode, killing at least 37 people and wounding thousands, it reinforced the group’s vulnerability to Israel’s intelligence agencies. 

Not only had Israel been able to strike successfully at the heart of Hizbollah’s command and control structures, it also delivered a stinging psychological blow, spreading panic across Lebanon and undermining the credibility of the nation’s dominant political and military force. 

Advertisement

“It’s definitely the hardest moment for the organisation since the 1990s,” said Emile Hokayem, director of regional security at the International Institute for Strategic Studies. “Militarily, it’s the biggest blow they’ve suffered so far.”

The question facing Hizbollah, battered and humiliated, is how it responds. 

The group has been locked in an intensifying conflict with Israel since it first fired rockets into the Jewish state a day after Hamas’s October 7 attack triggered the war in Gaza. Those clashes, however, have largely been contained to the Lebanese-Israeli border region. Hizbollah has made clear it does not want to be drawn into an all-out war with Israel’s far better equipped military. 

Advertisement

But Israel said this week that it was entering a “new phase” of the conflict as it launched the audacious attacks in Beirut and pounded the border region with the heaviest air strikes of the conflict. 

Analysts said Hizbollah is facing mounting pressure from its supporters, whose sense of security has been severely diminished, to change tactics and more forcefully repel Israel in a bid to restore its deterrence. 

Yet at the same time it is grappling with the aftermath of its most serious security breach in recent history, a severely disrupted communications network and the loss of some of its most senior commanders. 

“Hizbollah’s flank is exposed and they know it,” said a person familiar with the group’s thinking. “I don’t think they’ve ever been in such a vulnerable position before and it’s sowing enormous fear and panic. Everyone is wondering at all times, ‘what does Israel have in store for us next?’”

Advertisement

Hizbollah’s response has been muted, with its leader Hassan Nasrallah vowing a familiar refrain of retribution and ordering only a slight uptick in rocket fire at Israel. 

The group has acknowledged that two top commanders — including Ibrahim Aqil, the founder of its Radwan Force — were among those killed on Friday.

Israel said it killed the “senior chain of command” of the Radwan, the arm of Hizbollah responsible for cross-border operations into Israel and defending southern Lebanon against a ground invasion. 

Aqil’s death means that there are now only two out of the seven original members of the jihad council, Hizbollah’s top military body, left alive, according to two people familiar with the group’s operations. 

Advertisement

On top of that, hundreds of their fighters were maimed by the exploding pagers and walkie-talkies.

Experts said that Hizbollah would probably need time to recuperate and therefore may not significantly immediately escalate the conflict.

The group, Iran’s main proxy and one of the world’s most heavily armed non-state actors, still boasts a vast arsenal of rockets and increasingly accurate precision-guided missiles, and tens of thousands of fighters.

During the past 11 months of conflict, it has only deployed a fraction of its capabilities, experts said. 

Advertisement

But Israel has spent months targeting its fighters and rocket and missile launchers along the border.

“Hizbollah may be battered and weakened but it is not dead,” said Hokayem. “It’s still a disciplined, motivated organisation with an ethos and an ideology. They can survive.”

The choices facing the group includes raising the stakes with Israel to restore its credibility

“The other option is to suck it up, but Nasrallah was very clear about it, he’s not going to let go of the linkage between [supporting Hamas in] Gaza and Lebanon, because he knows it’s about his political perception and credibility,” he said.

Advertisement

“There’s an additional element, essentially all your detractors no longer see you as all powerful.”

In a front-page story on Saturday, Al Akhbar, a pro-Hizbollah Lebanese newspaper that often reflects the group’s thinking, said the militants would be forced to change tactics.

“What the enemy did yesterday was like closing the curtain on any political chapter related to the ongoing war in the region, and opening the door to a new level of confrontation that will force the resistance [Hizbollah] to adopt new methods,” Al Akhbar wrote. 

However, Amal Saad, an academic and Hizbollah expert, said: “No response will restore deterrence, that ship sailed a while ago”.

Advertisement

“The next phase will now be about denying Israel its strategic objectives,” she said, by preventing some 60,000 Israelis displaced from their country’s north from returning home.

“We’re talking about a new way to fight now because it’s a new paradigm, and a new stage in the war,” Saad said, adding that Hizbollah doesn’t have the intelligence capabilities to do respond in kind. “They will probably do something qualitatively different than what they’ve done before.”

That would involve keeping up the tempo of daily cross-border attacks, while trying to avoid mass civilian casualties to avoid giving Israel a pretext to trigger a full-scale war, she said.

Michael Milshtein, a former Israeli intelligence officer, said he believed Israel wanted to push Hizbollah to accept a diplomatic settlement that would force them back from the Israeli border. But he added that it “seems Israel is preparing itself for a broader escalation”.

Advertisement

“Israel really wants to cause damage to the functional and military sphere in Hizbollah,” Milshtein said. 

But there are also risks for Israel, particularly if it slid into “a broad escalation, even a regional one, not only in the north, without a strategy”.

“We have already seen in Gaza, the war started well by occupying almost half of Gaza, but now we are in a war of attrition,” Milshtein said.

“I am afraid that without a strategy, we will find ourselves in an unclear war, with heavy prices, a lot of crises with allies, and without very concrete goals. This would be a catastrophe.” 

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

News

BBC Strictly Come Dancing viewers say 'was not expecting that' as Chris sparks frenzy

Published

on

BBC Strictly Come Dancing viewers say 'was not expecting that' as Chris sparks frenzy


Shirley Ballas was in tears as she praised Strictly Come Dancing star and comedian Chris McCausland for his ‘unbelievable’ cha cha with professional partner Dianne Buswell

Source link

Continue Reading

Business

French prime minister takes rightward tilt with new government

Published

on

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

Michel Barnier, France’s new prime minister, picked a conservative senator for the key post of interior minister alongside figures from president Emmanuel Macron’s camp in an effort to forge a stable government that could survive in a hung parliament.

It took the conservative Barnier, the EU’s former Brexit negotiator, more than two weeks of difficult negotiations with the various parties in the National Assembly to come up with a government that he hopes will not fall to a no-confidence vote. The government faces tense budget negotiations that are expected to include unpopular spending cuts. 

Advertisement

Bruno Retailleau, a conservative senator from Barnier’s party known for his hard line on immigration and harsh criticism of Macron, will serve in the key post of interior minister, overseeing police and security. He replaces political heavyweight Gérald Darmanin. 

But centrists from Macron’s party or their allies were selected for key ministries in which the president traditionally holds more sway than the prime minister. The former Europe minister, Jean-Noël Barrot, is being promoted to head of the ministry for foreign affairs, while loyalist Sébastien Lecornu remains in charge at defence and the armies.  

“This is the most rightward-leaning government for more than a decade when Nicolas Sarkozy was president, and Retailleau is the only one real political heavyweight in the cabinet,” said political analyst and journalist Alain Duhamel on BFM TV.

The “real power” will lie in parliament, he added, where the opposition, stretching from the leftist Nouveau Front Populaire (NFP) to the far-right led by Marine Le Pen, will hold the fate of the Barnier government in their hands.

Advertisement

A little-known pair of deputies from Macron’s party has been named to serve in the crucial finance and budget ministries. Antoine Armand, a 33-year member of parliament who served on the energy commission, will take the all-important economy, finance and industry job. Another 39-year old lawmaker, Laurent Saint-Martin, will be in charge of the budget and public finances, reporting directly to Barnier. 

Replacing veteran finance minister Bruno Le Maire, the pair have the delicate task of crafting a new budget for 2025 that aims to redress deteriorating public finances with spending cuts.

The talks are expected to be contentious as Macron’s camp seeks to protect his pro-business legacy by holding off the left’s calls for tax hikes. The budget talks must grapple with a public deficit that is already expected to exceed the previous target of 5.1 per cent of GDP this year and reach at least 5.6 per cent.

With Barnier as premier, the cabinet will be operating more independently than at any time in Macron’s term in office. This could lead to tensions as the men hail from different parties and Macron is seeking to protect his legacy and retain his responsibility for defence and international diplomacy.

Advertisement

French politics have been in turmoil since Macron called snap elections in June that delivered a hung parliament where none of the three main blocs held enough seats to have a clear claim to the premiership.

Although Macron’s centrist alliance lost the most seats while the left and far-right expanded their ranks, the president selected Barnier to seal an alliance with the smallest faction, the conservative Les Republicains party that only won 47 seats.

In all, 38 portfolios including junior minister posts have now been allotted, with none going to the left-wing alliance NFP that won the most seats in the assembly. The NFP pushed hard for their own candidate to become prime minister, only to be rejected by Macron. Leftist activists held protests in Paris and elsewhere on Saturday against what they see as Macron’s choice to ignore the left’s election win.

“Why did Macron dissolve parliament if it’s to end up the same lot, just even more to the right?” former Socialist president François Hollande told France Bleu Radio on Friday after the ministerial appointments began to leak. 

Advertisement

Green party leader Marine Tondelier called the Barnier government “indecent” and “shameful” given the NFP’s strong result in the legislative election.

In a social media post on Saturday, Le Pen criticised the cabinet selection as not in keeping with “voters’ desire for change”. She said this would be “a transitional government”, hinting again that her Rassemblement National party could bring down Barnier’s government.

“The fact we did not block the government from the outset does not mean we don’t have the ability, depending on the budget, to back a no-confidence motion if we believe that the highest interests of the French are being trampled on,” Le Pen told Le Parisien newspaper last week. 

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Mike Lindell’s Latest Pillow Price Is Being Interpreted As A Nazi Dog Whistle

Published

on

On social media, Mike Lindell advertised his MyPillow products for $14.88.

Conspiracy theorist and pillow-pusher Mike Lindell is facing backlash online after his company marked down some of its pillows to $14.88, a figure seen as symbolic for white supremacists and neo-Nazis.

On Friday, Lindell and his MyPillow business advertised the discounted products on social media, promising consumers the “ultimate comfort upgrade.”

“Sleep like a dream with our Standard MyPillow for just $14.88!” the posts read in part.

On social media, Mike Lindell advertised his MyPillow products for $14.88.

On social media, Mike Lindell advertised his MyPillow products for $14.88. MyPillow / X

Below an image of Lindell holding two pillows is a large graphic prominently displaying the price.

Advertisement

The number “1488” is a common symbol used among hate groups. The “14” is shorthand for the “14 Words,” a stand-in for a white supremacist slogan, while “88” refers to an abbreviation of “Heil Hitler,” since H is the eighth letter of the alphabet.

The posts were shared on major platforms like Instagram, TikTok, Facebook and X, formerly Twitter. As of Saturday afternoon, the posts remained online, with hundreds of comments denouncing Lindell.

A spokesperson for MyPillow did not return a request for comment. Lindell could not be reached for comment.

Lindell, a staunch ally of former President Donald Trump, has repeatedly boosted conspiracy theories falsely claiming that the 2020 presidential election was stolen from Trump.

Advertisement

In 2021, Lindell offered $5 million to anyone who could win his “Prove Mike Wrong Challenge” by disproving data related to his election fraud claims.

In February, a judge confirmed that Lindell had to pay $5 million to a computer forensics expert who successfully took on Lindell’s challenge. Lindell recently handed over financial documents in the case as the expert tried to collect the money.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Ed-Tech’s Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Deficit

Published

on

“University of Florida Eliminates all DEI-Related Positions,” read a March 2, 2024, New York Times headline. The article documented how Florida’s decision to terminate funds for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) related programs resulted in the University of Florida removing all DEI-related positions from their campus. This is but one of a series of stories about how states such as Alabama and Indiana are working to eliminate DEI programs and content in education. While the anti-DEI efforts have received much media coverage, little attention has been paid to how educational technologies (ed-tech) undermine the mission of DEI advocates.

DEI work is an outgrowth of affirmative action policies born of the 1961 Executive Order No. 10925, signed by President John F. Kennedy. The order and subsequent legislation resulted in schools largely voluntarily adopting affirmative action policies that, in education specifically, sought to increase the representation of historically underrepresented groups, such as women and people of color. Work done in the name of affirmative action never settled comfortably into the United States’ hyper-individualist culture. Since its passage, the courts wrestled with affirmative action, culminating in the 2023 Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard, which effectively outlawed affirmative action on the grounds that current policies “lack sufficiently focused and measurable objectives warranting the use of race, unavoidably employ race in a negative manner, involve racial stereotyping, and lack meaningful end points.”

Like affirmative action, DEI has been skewered by individuals who do not believe in its mission. What is rarely discussed is how DEI advocates are often bamboozled by the ed-tech rhetoric into adopting tools and platforms that undermine the mission of DEI. The biggest ed-tech platforms and companies claim that their products adhere to DEI principles, but in practice, they counter the mission of DEI.

Advertisement

Today, students and teachers are monitored—and monitor each other—by a complex set of surveillance tools found in common classroom software and hardware, such as Turnitin, ClassDojo, Illuminate Education and G Suite for Education, Chromebooks, and Apple tablets, that enable technology management, law enforcement, teachers, students, and families to monitor classrooms, school libraries, and reading lists. This, in addition to one’s personal devices which listen as well.

Rather than enhance education, these tools undermine the autonomy of students, teachers, and families and reduce them to data repositories to be mined by Big Tech corporations. Big Tech’s economic viability rests on tracking and surveilling users, then selling that data and its analysis to predict and modify human behavior. Entering classrooms, especially the classrooms of minors, enables unprecedented access to precious data. Despite this invasiveness, it is perfectly legal, thanks to 2012 changes to the student privacy rights bill, Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974 (FERPA), that allowed ed-tech companies to access the private information of enrolled students.

Because compulsory education makes the vast majority of young people in the United States a captive audience, the changes to FERPA transformed schools into a testing ground for new surveillance technologies. Often introduced under the guise of safety, surveillance technologies collect copious amounts of data beyond what might be needed for educational purposes. For example, Bark, a product specifically designed to monitor students’ communications, can read all student data, including emails, web searches, and social media posts made on their school-issued and personal devices.

In their pursuit of profit and access to data, ed-tech companies undermine equity, which refers to the campus commitment that all students receive the unique support needed to achieve student success. Due to algorithmic bias, the unfair and discriminatory outcomes that result from the bias coded into algorithms, ed-tech companies produce inequitable outcomes for historically marginalized communities. For example, research has shown algorithmic bias in ed-tech, such as admissions platforms incorrectly concluding that students of color and students with disabilities are more prone to criminality and diagnosing LGBTQ+ students with mental health problems. It is also worth noting that surveillance in schools is inequitable as poorer students’ economic challenges force them to depend on school-issued digital devices and platforms, while wealthy students can skirt school surveillance by purchasing personal devices.

Advertisement

In addition to being inequitable, ed-tech tools often undermine inclusivity. For example, school-issued devices can and do alert campuses to student web searches about sexuality and in the process, have outed students’ sexual preference. As a result, the school closed down one of the few spaces that could potentially be inclusive for these students to explore their identity. Similarly, when surveillance is a prerequisite for education, students whose migrant status is in question face the additional challenge of protecting their place of residence, including any relatives whose status may also be contested.

Despite their rhetoric, ed-tech companies seem disinterested in promoting diversity. For example, Proctorio, a browser extension used in remote learning situations to scan the room via facial and gaze detection to determine if a student is cheating, seems to have not been coded to account for students with disabilities. Indeed, there have been cases where a student with a disability is scanned, and the program inaccurately accuses them of cheating. This discriminatory accusation creates an extra challenge for students with disabilities, who not only have to complete their education but also clear their name for an offense they did not commit. Relatedly, school districts have used algorithms in an effort to diversify their student body. Still, research has revealed that algorithmic biases in these platforms promote homogeneity, especially in terms of class and race, in schools.

As critical scholars, we argue that it is imperative to analyze, assess, and evaluate ed-tech tools and acknowledge their complexity. We do not aim to eradicate digital technologies from schools. However, the research is clear: Ed-tech, in its current form, does not support DEI. As a result, in addition to combating the anti-DEI efforts, DEI advocates must reflect upon how their use and support for ed-tech contributes to anti-DEI outcomes.


Allison Butler is a Senior Lecturer, Director of Undergraduate Advising, and the Director of the Media Literacy Certificate Program in the Department of Communication at the University of Massachusetts Amherst in Amherst, MA, where she teaches courses on critical media literacy and representations of education in the media. She is a contributor to The Media And Me: A Guide To Critical Media Literacy For Young People (2022) and co-author with Nolan Higdon of Surveillance Education Navigating the Conspicuous Absence of Privacy in Schools (Routledge, 2024).

Advertisement

Nolan Higdon is a founding member of the Critical Media Literacy Conference of the Americas, Project Censored National Judge, author, and university lecturer at Merrill College and the Education Department at University of California, Santa Cruz. He is a contributor The Media And Me: A Guide To Critical Media Literacy For Young People (2022) and co-author with Allison Butler of Surveillance Education Navigating the Conspicuous Absence of Privacy in Schools (Routledge, 2024).

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2017 Zox News Theme. Theme by MVP Themes, powered by WordPress.