Connect with us

Crypto World

Is the Pi Network Dream Over? Core Team’s Anniversary Post Met With Fury From Pioneers

Published

on

Growth, Challenges, and What’s Ahead


“What reason is there to celebrate,” asked one of the popular Pioneers below the Core Team’s post.

The team behind the controversial project posted a celebratory message a few days ago, marking the first anniversary of the Open Network’s launch.

However, many users questioned the project’s actual use case once again and lashed out at the lack of migration progress.

Advertisement

Open Network Celebrates 1st Birthday

In its blog post, the team began by outlining some of the achievements reached even before the official launch of the Open Network on February 20, 2025.

“Prior to Open Network, the Pi community collectively built out the ecosystem over six years to ensure Pi’s readiness and sustainable utility. This developmental period allowed Pi to create real apps and utilities for Pioneers to engage with, and verify the identities of millions of Pioneers to prepare the network for real-world assets and production processes.”

They explained that the main idea of Pi is to be a freely accessible, allowing “anyone to mine without technical or financial barriers.” The team added that this design allowed wide distribution and inclusivity, and also enabled the network and all participants to “afford the patience to engage in the difficult work necessary to establish a fully functional ecosystem predicated on utility.”

The post doubled down on the network’s progress, which aligns with the team’s long-term vision and strategy – to create an inclusive, utility-driven, and widely-adopted cryptocurrency that is broadly accessible.

Pioneers Lash Out

Perhaps it was some of those claims that triggered a significant backlash from numerous Pioneers on X under the Core Team’s post. YouLong/PiNetwork – a popular Pioneer with 27,000 followers, raised a few valid questions about the network’s state and the performance of the underlying token:

Advertisement

“What reason is there to celebrate? To celebrate the fact that compliant users have not migrated? Or to celebrate the steady decline in coin prices over the past year since its launch? Please approach the genuine concerns of long-time miners with objectivity.”

It’s worth noting that the PI token has been in a free-fall state for nearly a year. It peaked at $2.99 on February 26 last year, but has plunged by 94.5% since then and now sits inches above $0.16.

You may also like:

Other users echoed the previous statement, with one adding, “We are tired of waiting for the second migration,” while others said they have been waiting for five or six years for that coin migration.

SPECIAL OFFER (Exclusive)

SECRET PARTNERSHIP BONUS for CryptoPotato readers: Use this link to register and unlock $1,500 in exclusive BingX Exchange rewards (limited time offer).

Disclaimer: Information found on CryptoPotato is those of writers quoted. It does not represent the opinions of CryptoPotato on whether to buy, sell, or hold any investments. You are advised to conduct your own research before making any investment decisions. Use provided information at your own risk. See Disclaimer for more information.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Crypto World

OpenClaw Bans Bitcoin and Crypto Mentions on Discord After Fake Token Scare

Published

on

OpenClaw Bans Bitcoin and Crypto Mentions on Discord After Fake Token Scare

The developer behind the fast-growing open-source AI agent framework OpenClaw has confirmed that any mention of Bitcoin or other cryptocurrencies on its Discord server can lead to removal.

In a Saturday post on X, a user revealed that they were blocked from OpenClaw’s Discord simply for referencing Bitcoin block height as a timing mechanism in a multi-agent benchmark.

In response, OpenClaw creator Peter Steinberger confirmed the action, writing that members had accepted “strict server rules” upon joining and that the community maintains a “no crypto mention whatsoever” policy.

OpenClaw confirms ban on crypto. Source: Steinberger

Steinberger later agreed to re-add the user, asking them to email their username so he could restore their access to the server.

Related: Ethereum’s Trustless Agents standard is the missing link for AI payments

Advertisement

OpenClaw’s crypto problem began with a fake token

Trouble began during a rebrand after Steinberger received a trademark notice related to the project’s original name. In the short window between releasing old social accounts and claiming new ones, scammers seized the abandoned handles and promoted a Solana-based token called $CLAWD.

The token surged to roughly $16 million in market capitalization within hours before collapsing more than 90% after Steinberger publicly denied involvement. Early buyers accused the developer.

Steinberger responded at the time by warning users he would never launch a cryptocurrency and that any token claiming association with him was fraudulent. Security researchers later identified hundreds of exposed OpenClaw instances online and dozens of malicious plug-ins, many designed to target crypto traders.

OpenClaw has expanded rapidly since launching in late January, surpassing 200,000 GitHub stars within weeks and attracting a wide developer audience interested in autonomous agents.

Advertisement

Related: Deel taps MoonPay to roll out stablecoin salary payouts in UK, EU

Crypto firms bullish on AI agents

Industry leaders increasingly see crypto as the default payment rail for AI. Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire predicted that billions of agents will use stablecoins for routine payments within a few years