Connect with us

Politics

Supreme Court Shows A Willingness To Deny Trump’s ‘Emergencies’ — At Least For Now

Published

on

Supreme Court Shows A Willingness To Deny Trump's 'Emergencies' -- At Least For Now

WASHINGTON – Does the Supreme Court’s rejection of President Donald Trump’s claim that no one can challenge tariffs he imposed under an “emergency” mean that those same justices who placed the presidency above the law two years ago are now prepared to block his other, even more autocratic impulses?

Critics of Trump’s efforts to expand his powers are cautiously optimistic following Friday’s 6-3 decision in which Chief Justice John Roberts and Trump appointees Neil Gorsuch and Amy Coney Barrett joined with the court’s three justices appointed by Democratic presidents to rule against Trump, noting it shows a willingness to limit Trump’s claims of “emergency” authorities.

“The Supreme Court’s decision provides a roadmap for how the new left-right court majority intends to check Trump’s unlawful abuses of power,” said Norm Eisen, a lawyer in Barack Obama’s White House. “The opinion resoundingly rejects Trump’s contention that courts cannot review a president’s declaration of an emergency.”

Robert Kagan, a neoconservative scholar who served in Ronald Reagan’s State Department and stands among the most strident voices warning of a Trump dictatorship, was less sanguine.

Advertisement

“The fact that they were willing to do this is better than if they had gone the other way. Does it mean they are ready to step in on something like an election dispute?” he wondered. “If the administration claims foreign involvement and national security? If there are disputes about ballots? I can still see them delaying or punting on those questions.”

From the day he took office, Trump set off on a spree of declaring “emergencies” that he claimed allowed him to set aside laws or rules to push policies he wanted. An “energy” emergency, for instance, enabled him to open Alaska for fossil fuel drilling notwithstanding environmental laws and regulations. A “border” emergency has been the pretext for curtailing the refugee program, among many other actions.

Friday’s ruling was the first Supreme Court decision to block actions Trump has taken citing his “emergencies,” in this case tariffs he imposed because of fentanyl trafficking and a trade imbalance with the rest of the world.

“There is no exception to the major questions doctrine for emergency statutes,” the summary of the opinion states, citing a framework the court has in recent years used to invalidate programs it believed went too far beyond what laws had authorised. “Nor does the fact that tariffs implicate foreign affairs render the doctrine inapplicable.”

Advertisement

While a defiant Trump announced in a news conference three hours after the court’s decision that he would simply replace the struck-down tariffs with different ones, the probability of that happening and import taxes continuing was never really a primary concern for those worried about the future of the republic.

A tariff regime set by one president can be modified or eliminated by another president. The biggest worry of Kagan and others remains whether there will even be another president.

A worst-case scenario, some Trump critics posit, is that during the run-up to a national election, Trump issues an executive order declaring that the nation’s voting systems have been corrupted by malign foreign actors and that he is declaring a state of emergency, postponing elections until he determines the threat has ended and deploying troops to enforce his order.

Indeed, Trump has already hinted at such circumstances. He constantly lies that elections have been stolen from him through illegal voting, and he has multiple times spoken of taking over elections in states he dislikes.

Advertisement

Under the traditional legal framework, presidential findings in the areas of foreign affairs or national security are not subject to review by the courts, which have worked from the principle that they lack access to the intelligence agencies that presidents have and therefore cannot second-guess their decisions.

Friday’s ruling offered the first hint that a majority of justices are willing to challenge Trump if they believe he is overreaching.

“This was a clear-cut case, but it does establish a helpful baseline,” said Amanda Carpenter, a former aide to Texas GOP Sen. Ted Cruz and now a researcher with the nonprofit Protect Democracy.

Gorsuch, in a concurring opinion, wrote that all presidents seek to maximize their power, which is why the framers of the Constitution specifically gave so much of it to Congress.

Advertisement

“Our founders understood that men are not angels, and we disregard that insight at our peril when we allow the few (or the one) to aggrandize their power based on loose or uncertain authority,” he wrote.

Roberts went perhaps even further by making a factual, common-sense assertion ― without bothering to cite evidence gathered from lower courts, as is usually the case ― to contradict Trump’s claim of an emergency: “The United States, after all, is not at war with every nation in the world.”

Roberts criticized Trump’s ability to impose, reduce, increase and eliminate tariffs on a whim under that claimed authority.

“All it takes to unlock that extraordinary power is a presidential declaration of emergency, which the government asserts is unreviewable,” he wrote, quoting later from a 1952 decision: “And as the framers understood, emergencies can ‘afford a ready pretext for usurpation’ of congressional power.”

Advertisement

Democracy advocates have been leery of the current Supreme Court since its 2024 decision giving broad immunity from prosecution for presidents’ “official” acts taken in office. The ruling delayed movement in the criminal prosecution of Trump based on his Jan. 6, 2021, coup attempt. Trump won his office back in the November 2024 election, and the case was dismissed under standing Department of Justice policy to not prosecute a sitting president.

Ty Cobb, a former prosecutor who served in Trump’s first-term White House Counsel’s Office, said he was glad Roberts could manage to build a six-vote bloc in the tariffs case.

“The Kavanaugh dissent is very discouraging, however,” he said of Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s 61-page opinion that found novel ways of siding with the president who pushed through his controversial nomination. “Roberts and Barrett, though, and Gorsuch to a lesser extent, seem to understand the stakes now, which is a good thing. The chief justice was direct and forceful on this.”

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

Trott supports removal of Andrew from royal succession

Published

on

Trott supports removal of Andrew from royal succession

The post Trott supports removal of Andrew from royal succession appeared first on Conservative Home.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Phillipson Refuses to Say US Could Use UK Military Bases to Hit Iran

Published

on

Phillipson Refuses to Say US Could Use UK Military Bases to Hit Iran

Phillipson Refuses to Say US Could Use UK Military Bases to Hit Iran

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Jenrick: The Country is Going Bankrupt, Reform Has Got to be Responsible

Published

on

Jenrick: The Country is Going Bankrupt, Reform Has Got to be Responsible

Jenrick: The Country is Going Bankrupt, Reform Has Got to be Responsible

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Phillipson Grilled as Teacher Numbers Fall Year-on-Year

Published

on

Phillipson Grilled as Teacher Numbers Fall Year-on-Year

Phillipson Grilled as Teacher Numbers Fall Year-on-Year

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Keir Starmer’s war on democracy

Published

on

Keir Starmer’s war on democracy

spiked is funded by readers like you. Only 0.1% of regular readers currently support us. If just 1% did, we could grow our team and step up the fight for free speech and democracy.

Become a spiked supporter and enjoy unlimited, ad-free access, bonus content and exclusive events – while helping to keep independent journalism alive.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Boris Johnson: UK Should Now Send Troops to Ukraine to ‘Flip a Switch’ in Putin’s Head

Published

on

Boris Johnson: UK Should Now Send Troops to Ukraine to ‘Flip a Switch’ in Putin’s Head

Boris Johnson: UK Should Now Send Troops to Ukraine to ‘Flip a Switch’ in Putin’s Head

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

HMO housing quality used as rallying cry for racist protest

Published

on

HMO housing quality used as rallying cry for racist protest

The notoriously racist and Islamophobic group, the Official Protestant Coalition (OPC) is at it again, this time advertising a protest entitled “Local home for local people”. The intention here is clearly to signal that houses should not be reserved for migrants.

As has been the case for other protests they’ve promoted, the group seems to be adopting the plausible deniability approach when it comes to taking responsibility for organising the hate fest. The loyalist group say:

We have been informed. This protest is organised for the people by the people and everybody and every group no matter who they are is welcome time to make a stand. We have been asked to share this. We have not organised it, but we support it God bless.

OPC’s other recent posts include an example of how the far-right will find a way to bash Muslims regardless of the circumstances. They show a mocked-up headline featuring a picture of alleged rapist Andrew Windsor, with the words:

Prince Andrew converts to Islam; police immediately drop all charges

HMO dog whistle an excuse to bash migrants

The poster for the protest indicates it will take place on March 27 outside the planning offices for Belfast City Council. It also urges supporters to “Say no to HMOs”. HMO stands for House in Multiple Occupation, and has become a form of dog whistle for racists wanting to whip up anti-immigrant sentiment, under the guise of demanding better housing.

Advertisement

It can be an effective tactic, given that HMOs often are low-quality dwellings, suffering from mould and cramped rooms. Landlords will frequently convert a large home designed for a family and split it into separate flats. This increases what they term ‘yield’; i.e. you can cram a lot more people in than would previously have been the case, and make more money.

Often this ends up with unsuitable living conditions, such as kitchens or bathrooms without windows leading to the aforementioned issues with damp. In an article on how housing issues wrecked his mental health, Novara journalist Aaron Bastani described them as:

…shoeboxes with a focus on nothing but value extraction.

The other issue often raised is the issue of transience, in that HMOs are typically populated by young, single people who don’t stay long. This has led to complaints about a breakdown in “community cohesion“. In reality, they’re probably moving out quickly in most cases because the tiny damp flat they’re boxed into is unliveable.

The point about dire quality is doubly true for migrants, who typically end up in the worst places around. A recent report entitled Hostile Housing – The Health Impacts of Housing for People Seeking Asylum looked at the devastating impact shitty housing had on asylum seekers.

Advertisement

The vile reality — worst housing is reserved for asylum seekers

These are people who have typically had to flee their homes in horrendous circumstances, escaping persecution and war. Yet we disgracefully fail them by focusing on what the report terms “containment over care”. The authors found that:

Four key themes emerged from the survey data: inadequate housing conditions, loss of autonomy and rights, privacy and safety concerns, and food insecurity.

On housing quality, respondents described widespread problems including overcrowding, damp, mould, poor ventilation and persistent noise. These conditions were linked by participants to respiratory problems, skin conditions and deterioration in mental health.

One woman said:

Yes, I’m suffocating a lot, I’m 31 weeks pregnant in very small room where there is no ventilation… I have breathing issue because of this.

The likes of Serco, Mears Group and Clearsprings Ready Homes — who provide accommodation for asylum seekers — have attempted to have HMO legislation watered down.

Advertisement

The issue of housing should be the ultimate low hanging fruit for the left. Under a project of “more — and better quality — housing for all”, we could ensure better homes for everyone, and cut off an easy rallying point for the far-right.

The organisers of these protests are likely bile-filled racists, and some attendees will be too. That won’t be true of everyone going, however. Some will be angry people stuck on the obscenely long list for social housing, others will be people living in crap rentals under dodgy landlords. It’s a lot easier to scapegoat asylum seekers for social problems when those social problems are real.

The trick is to fix those problems, and show that it’s the likes of landlords, massive corporations, and their political lackeys who are to blame, not vulnerable people seeking protection after fleeing their home abroad.

Featured image via Belfast Media

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Trott: Labour is Trying to Tear Down the Performance of Those at the Top

Published

on

Trott: Labour is Trying to Tear Down the Performance of Those at the Top

Trott: Labour is Trying to Tear Down the Performance of Those at the Top

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

10 Cheeses You Can Still Eat If You’re Lactose Intolerant

Published

on

Knowing which cheeses contain lower percentages of lactose could open up a whole world of opportunities.

During an icebreaker game in college, one of my classmates confessed that she wasn’t allowed to eat cheese in her apartment.

Her fiancé couldn’t stand the sight or smell of cheese. Personally, that would be a relationship dealbreaker, but for others, avoiding cheese isn’t just a personal preference.

Lactose intolerance occurs when the small intestine produces too little lactase, the enzyme that digests lactose, which is the natural sugar in milk,” explained Michelle Routhenstein, a preventive cardiology dietitian and certified diabetes educator at Entirely Nourished.

“Undigested lactose passes into the large intestine, where bacteria ferment it, causing bloating, gas, cramps and diarrhoea.”

Advertisement
Knowing which cheeses contain lower percentages of lactose could open up a whole world of opportunities.

Mint Images via Getty Images

Knowing which cheeses contain lower percentages of lactose could open up a whole world of opportunities.

Despite these unpleasant symptoms, you don’t have to write off cheese entirely if you’re lactose intolerant. As it turns out, there are several types of cheese you can still enjoy, even if you’re sensitive to lactose.

Below, we consulted registered dietitians about what to look for in a cheese and which cheeses you can eat in moderation if you’re lactose intolerant.

Should you avoid lactose?

“Many people with lactose intolerance can tolerate about 1 to 4 grams of lactose per serving, especially when eaten with other foods, though individual thresholds vary,” Routhenstein said.

Advertisement

“Sticking to roughly 1 ounce of cheese, enjoying it as part of a meal, and spacing servings throughout the day can help improve tolerance.”

She also explained that lactose intolerance differs from a true milk allergy. “Anyone with a dairy allergy should avoid these cheeses entirely,” she said.

But if you’re sensitive to lactose or concerned about it affecting your digestion, you don’t need to avoid cheese completely. “Most of the lactose is strained out with the whey when making cheese,” Amanda Sauceda, a registered dietitian and gut health nutritionist, told HuffPost.

Let’s back up a second. There are two main proteins in milk: whey and casein. Whey is the cloudy liquid that is expelled from cheese curds during the process of making cheese or yogurt. “The remaining lactose gets broken down during fermentation as the cheese ages,” Sauceda said.

Advertisement

That means the older the cheese, the lower the lactose. “Aged or fermented cheeses contain very little lactose and are often easier to tolerate than milk or fresh dairy products,” Routhenstein said.

Some softer cheeses, such as feta, are lower in lactose. There are also dairy-based cheeses that are lactose-free, as well as plant-based cheeses that don’t contain lactose, Sauceda said.

Cheeses that are lower in lactose

Cheeses that are higher in lactose are those with more than 3 grams of lactose per 100 grams. Examples include softer cheeses like mascarpone, which contains 4% lactose, and ricotta, which can have as much as 5% lactose.

Advertisement

Even your favourite bagel spread can upset your stomach, as cream cheese contains between 4-4.6% lactose.

Some cheeses are lower in lactose, making them a good choice for people with lactose intolerance. Here are the cheeses our experts recommended.

Parmesan contains less than 0 grams of lactose per 1-ounce serving.

Martin Steinthaler via Getty Images

Parmesan contains less than 0 grams of lactose per 1-ounce serving.

Parmesan

Naturally low in lactose, Parmesan has less than 0 grams of lactose per 1-ounce serving, Sauceda said. Parmesan is also a source of vitamins and minerals, such as calcium and magnesium, which are important for bone health.

Advertisement

“I love to sprinkle Parmesan on soups because it adds depth of flavour,” she said. This dry cheese has a golden rind, which you can grate and sprinkle on your pizza or pasta for a zesty crunch.

Cheddar

As an aged, hard cheese, cheddar is naturally low in lactose. Along with adding texture and flavour, the cheese ripening process results in the production of proteins with anti-inflammatory effects.

Cheddar contains less than 1 gram of lactose per 1.5-ounce serving or less than 2% lactose, Sauceda said. “For reference, one cup of milk has 12 grams of lactose.”

Advertisement

She recommended keeping a block of cheddar on hand to pair with fruit like pears and grapes. “Shred the cheese for an easy topping on veggies you may not love,” she said. “Cheddar gets me more excited about broccoli.” This food hack isn’t just for kids.

Goat’s cheese

Made from goat’s milk, goat cheese has about 0.5 to 1 % lactose, Routhenstein said. “Its fat structure and mild acidity make it gentler on digestion,” she said.

Goat’s cheese has a tangier flavour and less lactose than cheeses made from cow’s milk. “It can be spread on salads, roasted vegetables, or whole-grain toast, adding flavor and heart-healthy fiber,” she said.

Advertisement

Havarti

If you’re looking for a delicious and creamy cheese, look no further than Havarti, which contains 1% lactose.

“It needs to be aged enough to reduce remaining lactose,” Kristen Carli, a registered dietitian from WOWMD, told HuffPost. If the label doesn’t indicate the cheese is aged, visually inspect it for a darker yellow colour or a crumbly texture.

Havarti has a buttery flavour which becomes more intense and tangier with age. Enjoy it with fruit and wine or shred some Havarti on your favourite breakfast omelette.

Advertisement

Gouda

“Aged Gouda contains 1% lactose,” Carli said. It has a sweet, nutty flavour and a crumbly texture that’s similar to Parmesan when it’s aged. “Gouda is best enjoyed with fruits and nuts on a cheese board,” she said.

Creamy brie only contains about 1-2% lactose.
Creamy brie only contains about 1-2% lactose.

Brie

Known for its buttery flavour and white rind, brie tends to be low in lactose, containing 1 to 2%.

“Most of the lactose is removed early when the whey is drained, and the bacteria in the cheese keep breaking down the rest as it ages,” Routhenstein said. “So, even though it’s creamy, brie doesn’t have much lactose and is easier to digest for those who are lactose intolerant.”

Advertisement

You can enjoy brie at room temperature on a cheese plate. Or add it to flat bread or grilled cheese for melt-in-your-mouth deliciousness.

Swiss

With its holey appearance reminiscent of the moon, Swiss is a long-standing favourite. During fermentation, bacteria produce carbon dioxide and trap gas bubbles, resulting in the formation of eyes or holes.

Swiss contains 1% lactose, Carli said. Her advice was to enjoy it melted in French onion soup. Since Swiss is less salty than other cheeses, you can enjoy it with cured meats like bacon or prosciutto or crunchy snacks like crackers and pretzels.

Advertisement

Feta

At 1% lactose, feta is another option for lactose-weary cheese lovers. It’s made from sheep’s milk.

“When it’s aged enough to reduce remaining lactose, sheep’s milk is even lower than cow’s milk versions,” Carli said. She recommended sprinkling feta on a Mediterranean salad, which usually contains a mixture of cucumbers, olives, tomatoes, red onions, and feta cheese tossed in olive oil or a lemon vinaigrette.

Farmer’s cheese

Advertisement

You can find American-style farmer’s cheese in grocery stores. It’s made from pressing cottage cheese to remove the water.

“Farmer’s cheese contains slightly more lactose, around 2 to 3%, but small portions are usually well tolerated,” Routhenstein said. “As a fermented dairy, farmer’s cheese provides probiotics that support gut health and may help protect the heart.”

She recommended mixing farmer’s cheese into fruit or sprinkling it on cucumbers with a dash of black pepper for a savoury, heart-healthy snack.

Cottage cheese

Advertisement

“With about 3 to 4% lactose, cottage cheese is a little bit higher in lactose but is still a good option when eaten in moderation,” Sauceda said. “A 100-gram serving, which is about half a cup, will have some lactose because it’s a fresh cheese with some of the whey remaining.”

Her advice is to start with a quarter cup of cottage cheese and see how your stomach feels. “Lately, I’ve been using cottage cheese, oats, and egg to make a pancake scramble,” she said. “Cottage cheese is really an MVP in the kitchen because you can bake with it, add it to pasta sauces to punch up the protein, or just enjoy it as is.”

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Phillipson on Trump Tariffs: We Want to Secure the Best Deal for British Businesses

Published

on

Phillipson on Trump Tariffs: We Want to Secure the Best Deal for British Businesses

Phillipson on Trump Tariffs: We Want to Secure the Best Deal for British Businesses

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025