Connect with us

Politics

Trott supports removal of Andrew from royal succession

Published

on

Trott supports removal of Andrew from royal succession

The post Trott supports removal of Andrew from royal succession appeared first on Conservative Home.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

Tucker Carlson claims Netanyahu threatened his family

Published

on

Tucker Carlson claims Netanyahu threatened his family

Right-wing US commentator Tucker Carlson has claimed that Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu threatened him and his family:

Carlson is an outspoken critic of the relationship between the US and Israel.

Tucker Carlson — Amalek

Carlson was speaking about trying to arrange a meeting with Netanyahu:

Advertisement

I really pushed hard for this meeting. And I called a lot of people who know him and who are in regular contact with him. In fact, I went to go see some of those people directly.

‘Please, can you help me get a sit down for five minutes with Benjamin Netanyahu?’

And I probably called or met with six, seven, eight, maybe more people on this question. People in official capacities, people in the Israeli government. I know a number of people in the Israeli government – people in Israel – a friend of mine in California who knows him. I mean, I really, really tried. And I did so for two reasons.

One, because there was a threat to my family. The Israeli government, and Netanyahu himself, tried to punish two members of my family. I won’t be more specific, but actually punished two members of my family. Because he, as he has said in public many times, believes in blood guilt, Amalek. You know, when someone commits a crime against you, you punish not just him, but his family, his bloodline.

The following video shows Netanyahu referencing ‘Amalek’:

Advertisement

James Wright reported the following on this for the Canary in October 2024:

Another striking example of genocidal intent was Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu himself stating in November “you must remember what Amalek has done to you, says our Holy Bible. And we do remember”.

This is a genocidal dog-whistle established on Israel’s far right. The Old Testament reads: “Now go, attack the Amalekites and totally destroy all that belongs to them. Do not spare them; put to death men and women, children and infants, cattle and sheep, camels and donkeys”.

Carlson has also said the following about Netanyahu and his influence over the US:

Advertisement

Featured image via WEF (Flickr) / Gage Skidmore (Wikimedia)

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and CNN’s Clarissa Ward on the state of the war | The Conversation

Published

on

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and CNN’s Clarissa Ward on the state of the war | The Conversation

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and CNN’s Clarissa Ward on the state of the war | The Conversation

lead image

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Maine has a long track record of electing moderates. Enter Graham Platner.

Published

on

Maine Gov. Janet Mills speaks to supporters in Brunswick, Maine, on Jan. 28.

BRUNSWICK, Maine — The fireplace crackled as Democratic Gov. Janet Mills laid out her vision for beating Susan Collins to a room of supporters in late January. Then came the questions about her primary opponent, Graham Platner.

Platner, one attendee noted, was very successful on social media. A second pointed to his support among young people and asked Mills whether she would support him if he became the party’s nominee.

“I am a Democrat,” Mills answered, before pivoting to how she sought as governor to make the state more affordable for young Mainers.

Mills’ Democratic primary opponent isn’t her favorite subject. She would rather talk about how she expanded Medicaid, bolstered protections for reproductive rights, and, most recently, challenged President Donald Trump over the surge of immigration enforcement in the state — issues that conveniently allow the governor to draw contrast with Collins, the five-term Republican who Democrats must unseat in order to take back control of the Senate.

Advertisement

Maine Gov. Janet Mills speaks to supporters in Brunswick, Maine, on Jan. 28.

But Platner, a political newcomer, has made himself all but unavoidable in conversations about the Maine Senate race. The 41-year-old oyster farmer and combat veteran is unlike any other recent popular candidate the state has seen: He is brash. He is progressive. He has drawn crowds of hundreds of people, national attention and millions in campaign dollars.

Platner’s meteoric rise reflects a growing frustration with the Democratic establishment and voters’ interest in a new generation of leaders. He is campaigning not just against Collins but against a “billionaire class,” running a campaign in the style of Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), who endorsed him.

His battle with Mills comes at a moment when the stakes for Democrats could hardly be higher. Though the Maine Democratic Party doesn’t take positions in primaries, some establishment figures like Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer have backed the moderate governor, who they believe is their best shot at defeating Collins to win back the Senate in 2026.

The challenge for Platner is that he is running on a vision of disruptive progressivism and generational change in Maine, the oldest state in the nation and one with a long track record electing senators perceived as moderates within their parties. Mills would largely fit that image; Platner would blow it up entirely. But he is betting that voters now want what he is offering — and his early support makes it hard to ignore the possibility.

Advertisement

“If you look at everyone from Bill Cohen to Angus King to George Mitchell to Susan Collins and Olympia Snowe, there’s a strong, moderate streak there when it hits November,” said Adam Cote, a Maine lawyer and veteran who ran for governor in 2018, coming in second to Mills in the Democratic primary. “In the primary, I don’t know.”

A woman films a Homeland Security Investigations agent at a parking lot in Portland, Maine, on Jan. 23.

While public polling in the race has been relatively scarce, an internal poll released by Platner’s campaign last month had him up by double digits over Mills. He has 283,000 followers on Instagram compared to 61,000 for Mills and 25,000 for Collins. His campaign boasts of a 15,000-person strong volunteer network. Through the end of December, he raised $7.8 million to $2.7 million for Mills, enough to begin running TV ads more than four months in advance of the June primary.

“My wife makes this joke. I’ve been just saying the same bullshit for years, ranting on about structural inequality, ranting on about, like, American history and how we need to reconnect with things. Nobody cared about me because I was a random dude in Sullivan, Maine,” Platner said in an interview. “I’m now running for United States Senate, and I get to have this conversation at a national level.”

Both in style and substance, Platner is unlike any candidate who has risen to the highest levels of Maine politics in recent decades. Even before he faced a litany of controversies in the fall — including a series of offensive old Reddit posts for which he apologized and a tattoo of a Nazi symbol that he had covered up — the Sullivan oysterman was building an operation different from any Maine Democrat.

Advertisement

Platner does not like the label of progressive, but where he differs with Mills on policy, his positions are largely to her left. He has backed progressive priorities like Medicare for All, described Israel’s military actions in Gaza as a genocide, and favors abolishing Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

Asked whether progressives can win in Maine, Platner pointed to polling showing Sanders’ popularity despite his finishing narrowly behind Joe Biden in the 2020 presidential primary.

Supporters packed a gymnasium during a campaign event for Platner in Damariscotta, Maine in October 2025.

Although more progressive state lawmakers have been elected from southern Maine over the past few election cycles, further-left candidates finished far behind the more moderate ones in statewide primaries for governor in 2018 and Senate in 2020.

“There’s a reason why [Rep. Chellie] Pingree never ran for governor,” said Mark Brewer, a political science professor at the University of Maine. “She recognizes it would be very difficult for someone that’s as far to the left as she is to win statewide in Maine. And when we look at the Democrats who do win statewide, they look like Janet Mills.”

Advertisement

Some of Platner’s appeal may come less from his specific progressive stances than from his ability to capture the energy of Democratic voters upset about the state of the country — and at their own party for not doing enough to stand up to it. Trump’s second term led even people who were not previously politically active to show up for protests, with many aligned with Platner’s style of economic populism, said Andy O’Brien, a Maine writer and activist supporting Platner.

“The Trump administration has just been so extreme that I think it’s really radicalized average, ‘normie’ voters,” O’Brien said.

In an interview, Platner recalled going to a local Democratic party meeting in early 2025 and coming away frustrated that attendees were talking about bylaws, not Trump. In his view, there was pent up grassroots energy to fight the administration — shown, for example, by large No Kings protests in the state — but few organized outlets to turn it into action.

His campaign proved one outlet for that energy. Following a surge in ICE activity in Maine in January, Platner led a protest at Collins’ offices in Portland and Bangor, calling on the senator to cut funding to the agency. Dozens of supporters showed up in single-degree temperatures.

Advertisement

“I’m a supporter of Graham Platner because we need a U.S. senator to represent Maine who will be honest with us, who will be truthful with us, and will work for us,” said Laura Neal, a Bar Harbor resident who attended the protest with a sign reading “My Cat Hates ICE.”

Laura Neal stands with her poster during during an anti-ICE protest outside Susan Collins' office in Bangor, Maine, on Jan. 29.Platner speaks with attendees during the protest.Dozens of protesters showed up in single-degree temperatures, calling on Collins to cut funding to the agency.

Like many Platner backers, Neal doesn’t dislike Mills, but thinks it is time to move on. “I think Governor Mills has done a great job, and it’s time for new energy,” she said.

In much of the national conversation about the Maine Senate race, Mills has been the less talked about candidate. It’s an odd position for a well-vetted two-term governor.

Her diagnosis for why Maine Democrats have not been able to knock off Collins is straightforward: Past nominees have been “untested.” The GOP senator has never had to face a Democrat who has won statewide before. If Collins has won in part because of her deep history in the state, Mills matches her.

Advertisement

“Each of us probably knows everybody in Maine, one way or other,” Mills said in an interview.

In much of the national conversation about the Maine Senate race, Mills has been the less talked about candidate.

Mills started as district attorney in rural, more conservative western Maine before being elected to the state legislature, then served as attorney general for much of Republican Paul LePage’s tenure as governor, frequently clashing with him. In 2018, she became the first gubernatorial candidate in Maine in 20 years to win the general election with at least 50 percent of the vote, as well as the state’s first female governor. Four years later, when LePage attempted a comeback, she beat him by 13 percentage points.

Governing with a Democratic trifecta, Mills expanded Medicaid and enacted a string of other priorities, including free community college, universal school meals and expanded abortion access following the Dobbs decision.

Since Trump’s return to office, Mills has faced off with him several times. In a White House confrontation last year, the president threatened to withhold funding from Maine over the state’s continued allowance of transgender participation in youth sports, Mills fired back: “See you in court.” The Trump administration paused certain agriculture department funding to Maine; the state sued and the money was restored.

Advertisement

The episode provided a theme that underlies the governor’s Senate campaign: Collins has not stood up to the president, but Mills will. Her latest TV ad describes her as “the one who took on Donald Trump and won.”

“Susan Collins is formidable,” said Trish Riley, a retired health policy expert who hosted Mills in her Brunswick home last month. “And the only person who can beat a formidable candidate is another formidable candidate, and that’s Janet.”

Mills, then a state representative, pours over documents with fellow lawmakers during a session at the State House in Augusta in 2005.

Mills’ tenure as governor has not been free from conflict with other Democrats. She at times disagreed with progressives in the legislature, issuing more than 50 vetoes, with the most prominent conflicts around labor and tribal sovereignty. That created openings for Platner to hit her record from the left, and his prominent endorsers have included several labor unions.

The bigger challenge for her in the primary may be the support from national Democrats like Schumer. Sara Gideon’s 2020 loss to Collins, despite strong national Democratic support which helped her far outspend the Republican, led to a sense in the state that the national Democratic actors did not use money wisely and did not understand Maine. For some, that distrust has only compounded since Trump returned to office.

Advertisement

“There’s a reaction among a lot of Democrats to what they see as the weakness of the establishment leaders in Washington,” said Amy Fried, a retired political science professor from the University of Maine and longtime Collins critic. “The fact that Chuck Schumer is the one who recruited Mills — maybe she would have run anyway, but he’s definitely associated with her. And then you have a lot of people who are on the Left who are really unhappy with what Democratic leadership has done when it comes to pushing back on Trump.”

Mills maintains that she made no promises to Schumer, and the decision to run was hers. She bristles at the idea that she would be considered part of the political establishment.

“I got elected to the legislature, not because somebody said, ‘You should be anointed to his job.’ I worked for it, I ran for it, and I won,” she said in an interview. “When I ran for district attorney, I defeated three guys for the primary, and then another guy for the general. Nobody ever gave it to me on a silver platter. Again, when I ran for governor: Seven-way primary. And I won. I’m used to that. Bring it on.”

Mills arrives to a meeting with mayors from across Maine at City Hall in Portland on Jan. 28, to discuss the impact of ICE operations on local communities.Mills started as district attorney in rural, more conservative western Maine before being elected to the state legislature, then served as attorney general.

Republicans have been gleeful at the prospect of a grueling primary.

Advertisement

“Maine Democrats are in a race of extreme vs more extreme — the only question is which of their candidates will run farther to the left to claim victory in this messy primary,” Republican National Committee spokesperson Kristen Cianci said in a statement.

Whoever prevails in June will have to take on the electorally resilient Collins. If Democrats fail to knock off the GOP senator, there will be recriminations from whichever side loses the primary that their candidate would have been able to defeat her.

Most supporters of Platner and Mills say they would back the eventual Democratic nominee regardless, with defeating Collins the most important priority. But a nasty primary could still risk alienating some voters, when every vote will count in November.

“The differences are really pretty big between the two candidates, and I think it’s probably going to get strongly oppositional towards the end,” said Cote, the former gubernatorial candidate. “And how the victor is going to unite the party afterwards is going to be a huge challenge.”

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

‘If we can win here, we can win anywhere’

Published

on

‘If we can win here, we can win anywhere’

The post ‘If we can win here, we can win anywhere’ appeared first on spiked.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Middle East furious after Trump ally says Israel should own them

Published

on

Middle East furious after Trump ally says Israel should own them

On 21 February, we reported on disturbing comments from the US ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee. Our focus was that Huckabee wants the world to pay Israel reparations for the genocide it inflicted upon Gaza. It’s another comment from Huckabee which has caused international controversy, however, especially in the Middle East:

The Middle East United

As we reported yesterday, Huckabee is an American evangelist:

Many American evangelicals support Israel, but not because they like Israelis. In actuality, they think the creation of Israel is a signifier that the end times are approaching, and that Israel will trigger the Rapture.

If you’re unfamiliar with the term, the ‘Rapture’ is the time when God calls his faithful back to heaven. Said ‘faithful’ will not include the Jewish men and women who live in Israel, even if they do play an instrumental role in jump starting the Armageddon.

While it’s perfectly possible for faithful people to serve in government, it’s a different story for zealots. The response to Huckabee’s comments demonstrate why that is.

The following is what Huckabee said:

Advertisement

In the clip, Carlson makes it clear that Huckabee’s vision of an expanded Israel would mean the overthrow of every sovereign country in the Middle East. Huckabee says he would be “fine if they took it all”.

Just imagine the response if a Chinese ambassador said he would be fine with Mexico taking over all 50 US states.

Advertisement

The problem for Donald Trump is that he’s sought to have good relations with the wealthier Middle Eastern countries. Now, Saudi Arabia and others have made it clear they’re furious with the Trump regime’s messaging:

Alliances

Obviously it’s a problem that the West is most comfortable with the wealthy Middle Eastern countries which use literal slaves. At the same time, Huckabee’s comments have just made it more difficult for the US to wage another devastating war in the Middle East:

Much like in Europe, Middle Eastern countries may be realising that the US only looks out for itself.

Featured image via Trade Mark Room

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Muslims back democracy more than the general public, poll finds

Published

on

Muslims back democracy more than the general public, poll finds

A new poll conducted by Opinium has wrecked the far-right myth that Muslims in the UK and US are determined to impose Sharia law on everyone else. Opinium shared the results with Zeteo, who report:

The survey of 1,000 American Muslims and 500 British Muslims, conducted by Opinium for the Concordia Forum, a transatlantic thinktank and networking group, in October 2025, measured views on democracy, equality, and the intersection of religion and country.

85% of Muslims across Britain and the North of Ireland voted for democracy when asked:

Do you believe democracy is the best system of government for the country you live in or do you think another system would be better?

This compares to 71% of the general population giving the same answer to the question. In the United States, the figures were 81% for Muslims and 67% for the general population. Opinium asked a range of other questions too, including querying Muslims as to whether they had:

…changed [their] routine or avoided certain places due to concerns of anti-Muslim hate or violence.

Survey also finds Muslims are changing lifestyle to avoid threat of violence

Alarmingly, only 15% said they never change their routine. 32% of UK respondents said they “often or “always” make adjustments due to concerns of violence. This fear is rational given the huge rise in Islamophobia in recent years. Tell Mama, a group that measures anti-Muslim prejudice, said in February 2025 that cases of hatred towards practitioners of the faith were at an all-time high. They reported:

Advertisement

…a large rise in the categorisation of ‘threatening behaviour’ in street based cases. This amounts to a 715% increase in such cases between 2023 and 2024.

They also describe a:

…surge in rhetoric that falsely portrays Muslims as terrorists or terrorist sympathisers.

This has accelerated during the Gaza genocide, amidst rhetoric from so-called ‘Israel’ and its supporters that cast the Zionist entity as being at the forefront of a battle between a supposedly civilised ‘Judeo-Christian’ axis and a regressive Muslim world. The whole concept of a single Judeo-Christian ideology is a myth, just as much as the ‘clash of civilisations’ narrative.

US political scientist Samuel Huntington concocted the latter concept as a cynical ploy to unite the US against an external enemy. This too was driven by his bigoted fears that a diverse US population would end up internally divided. Huntingdon said:

There can be no true friends without true enemies. Unless we hate what we are not, we cannot love what we are.

Our current ruling class are intent on ensuring we have someone to hate, to distract from the fact they continue to rob us blind. Muslims are still the main fall guy for this tactic. US president Donald Trump attempted to maintain the pretence that Muslims are subverting democracy when he said:

Advertisement

I look at London, where you have a terrible mayor, terrible, terrible mayor, and it’s been changed, it’s been so changed. Now they want to go to sharia law. But you are in a different country, you can’t do that.

This sort of shite seems to be having an effect. A 2024 Hope Not Hate survey of Conservative Party members:

…found that 52% believed parts of European cities were under sharia law and were no-go areas for non-Muslims.

Billionaires are the true haters of democracy

In reality, the people who have the greatest disdain for democracy are authoritarian politicians like Trump and the billionaire class they serve. Trump famously goaded his supporters into an insurrection in 2021, and has ranted to his military about the need to purge an “enemy within”. The brownshirts of his personal paramilitary force ICE have been murdering dissenters around the US.

Billionaires like Peter Thiel loathe the notion that his ilk ought to be constrained by the popular will. He has talked about a desire:

…to find an escape from politics in all its forms.

He also declared:

Advertisement

I no longer believe that freedom and democracy are compatible.

This, of course, is a conception of liberty in which ‘freedom for the pike is death for the minnows‘. Ultra-rich paedo Jeffrey Epstein viewed most people with total disdain, pondering that:

Maybe climate change is a good way of dealing with overpopulation.

His eugenicist fantasies included vile breeding programs to populate the world with his own supposedly superior genetic material. Elon Musk also has a similar disdain for democracy, illustrated by the fact he is a literal Nazi. He likewise shares Epstein’s belief in diluting the world’s gene pool with clones of his deeply flawed self.

Through their overt belief that they are uniquely qualified to rule, these people show us who are the true opponents of democracy. In the case of billionaires, despite never being elected, they reckon they have the right to determine the future of the species. If we want democracy to survive, it’s not Muslims we need worry about — it’s concentrations of extreme wealth and the economic system that makes it possible.

Featured image via MiddleEastEye

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

The Tories are to blame for the student loan system, Phillipson insists

Published

on

The Tories are to blame for the student loan system, Phillipson insists

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Government Not Ruling Out Removing Andrew From Succession Line

Published

on

Government Not Ruling Out Removing Andrew From Succession Line

A cabinet minister has promised the government is “not ruling anything out” when it comes to the possibility of removing Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor from the line of succession.

The former prince was already stripped of his titles last autumn over his connection to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

Fresh details about their relationship saw police arrest Andrew, formerly a UK trade envoy, over allegations of misconduct in public office on Thursday.

He was released under investigation. The former Duke of York has always vehemently denied any wrongdoing.

Advertisement

The developments have sparked widespread calls for the government to take further action against the former prince, who remains eighth in line to the throne.

Doing so would require an act of parliament, meaning it would need approval from MPs and peers before going to the King for royal assent.

It would need to be supported by 14 Commonwealth countries where King Charles is still the head of state, too.

Andrew is also still part of the Privy Council, a formal body of advisers to the monarch, which acts as a key link between the monarchy and the government.

Advertisement

So Sky News presenter Trevor Phillips asked education secretary Bridget Phillipson: “When can we expect to see draft legislation, excluding the form of Prince Andrew from the line of succession?”

She replied: “So we’re not ruling anything out, around this, but we have obviously got a live police investigation underway, so we’ll not be setting out further steps until the police have been able to do their work.

“And wherever that investigation, wherever the evidence takes them.”

Phillips said: “But so you’re up for this and also presumably advising the King to remove him from the Privy Council?”

Advertisement

“So we’ve said that we have to keep all of these options available to us,” the cabinet minister replied. “But you’ll appreciate that because we have a live police investigation underway.

“It’s right that the police are allowed to do their job.

“Once that is concluded, then of course we’ll consider in discussion, with the royal family, with the King, what further action is needed.

“But I do just think as well, in all of this, we really shouldn’t lose sight of where this began.

Advertisement

“And where this began was with young women and girls being exploited over an extended period of time by a network of very powerful men and we can’t ever forget that.”

Her remarks come after defence minister Luke Pollard told BBC Radio 4 that the government has “absolutely” been working with Buckingham Palace to stop Andrew “potentially being a heartbeat away from the throne.”

He said he hoped the idea would receive “cross party support” but warned that something like that could only happen when the police investigation concludes.

Lib Dem leader Ed Davey said last week that the monarchy must work to make sure Andrew can “never become king”, while Green leader Zack Polanski said “when necessary” people should be “removed” from their positions.

Advertisement

Andrew was detained for 11 hours on Thursday, which was his 66th birthday.

Police searched his property on the Sandringham estate on the day and are in the middle of a five-day search of his Windsor home, Royal Lodge.

Several other police forces are allegedly considering launching an investigation into the former prince based on the Epstein files.

It comes after the US Department of Justice released more than three million documents about Epstein and his connections around the world last month, including his contact with Andrew.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Jenrick says Badenoch ‘got very riled’ by his defection to Reform

Published

on

Jenrick says Badenoch 'got very riled' by his defection to Reform

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Phillipson Refuses to Say US Could Use UK Military Bases to Hit Iran

Published

on

Phillipson Refuses to Say US Could Use UK Military Bases to Hit Iran

Phillipson Refuses to Say US Could Use UK Military Bases to Hit Iran

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025