(Alamy)

5 min read4 hr

Under the plans, announced by Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson on Monday, only those children with the most severe and complex needs will receive an education, health and care plan (EHCP). This is the current legal document that identifies the specific needs and sets out tailored support.

In practice, it means fewer children will be given ECHPs than would have been under the current system.

There is a cross-party agreement that the current SEND system is not sustainable, as it is putting extreme pressure on councils and resulting in long waits for parents trying to secure support for their children. The Labour government pledged to fix the system when it was elected in July 2024.

Speaking to reporters today, Phillipson said the changes would be a “really careful and phased transition” and would be a “decade-long reform”.

“I know that parents’ confidence is low in the system. That’s why the fact we’re taking our time to get this right is essential,” she said.

Why is SEND being reformed?

SEND has been a growing talking point in Westminster in recent years as pressure on the system has increased to extreme levels.

Under the current rules, pupils requiring extra support can be issued an EHCP, a legal document that identifies the specific needs and sets out tailored support.

Since 2018, the number of pupils with EHCPs has increased by almost 80 per cent, while funding to deliver the service has failed to keep pace, putting local government finances under significant pressure.

Nearly 80 per cent of local authorities told a recent Local Government Association survey that they would become insolvent in the next few years without reforms to the system.

At the same time, some parents are waiting months and sometimes years to secure support for their children.

What has the government announced?

Speaking today, Phillipson stressed that EHCPs for children with the most complex needs will remain.

However, fewer children will be granted EHCPs overall under the reforms.

The Department for Education estimates that around one in eight children and young people who currently have an EHCP will shift to new support between 2030 and 2035.

Instead, three layers of support will be available to those with additional needs, set out as “Targeted”, “Targeted Plus” and “Specialist”, the latter of which will be the basis of EHCPs.

The government has pledged £4bn over three years to improve SEND support in mainstream education settings.

Millions of children will also have access to a new, digital ‘Individual Support Plan’ (ISP), which will be put on a statutory footing, provided by the school and developed alongside parents. 

The ISP will set out what support a child with additional needs requires from the school, and could include support from health professionals. 

Phillipson insisted that the changes were about “improving” support, not removing it”.

The reforms announced on Monday will not come into effect until 2030 at the earliest.

The government is hopeful that the period of transition, in which the focus will be on training and investment to build capacity in the system, will allow for a smooth changeover.

What is the reaction so far?

The government had originally planned to publish the planned SEND reforms last year. 

However, as PoliticsHome reported at the time, there was nervousness within government about a potential Labour MP backlash similar to the rebellion that forced Prime Minister Keir Starmer to abandon plans to reduce welfare last year.

In a bid to ensure Labour MPs feel that their concerns and points of view are being listened to throughout the process, Phillipson and minister Georgia Gould have held many meetings with Labour MPs in recent months to discuss the reforms.

Asked by PoliticsHome on Monday what message she had for MPs worried about the changes, the Education Secretary said: “This is a once-in-a-generation opportunity to deliver a better system for children”.

“Opportunities like this really only come around once, and it’s a big responsibility on all of us to reassure parents, to explain the process of change that we’re embarking upon, and it’s a responsibility that I take incredibly seriously.”

Labour MPs will now take time to study the proposals in detail, while ministers will hope that they can win the support of as much of the Parliamentary Labour Party as possible.

One government source told PoliticsHome that they are not seeing this as the end of the conversation, and the Labour MP outreach that Phillipson has carried out in recent months will continue.

Paul Whiteman, general secretary of school leaders’ union NAHT, said that he was “cautiously optimistic” that the White Paper published today “contains the foundation of a successful new approach to SEND education”.

However, there are concerns that the funding announced may not be adequate. 

Matt Wrack, general secretary of teachers’ union NASUWT, said that it was “absolutely ridiculous to suggest that SEND provision can be adequately overhauled with this low level of funding”.

Dani Payne, head of education and social mobility at the Social Market Foundation think tank, said that it was “good to see government take on an area that is both complex and politically challenging”.

“The government’s planned approach, of prioritising mainstream inclusion for pupils with SEND and strengthening universal support offers, is the right one.”

The Metropolitan Police have arrested Peter Mandelson on suspicion of misconduct in public office.

Police escorted Mandelson from his home in Camden at around 5pm on Monday, 23 February.

He has been under investigation over allegations of his links to – and insider trading with – paedophile and child rape trafficker Jeffrey Epstein whilst he was a serving government minister.

This comes after the Met Police confirmed earlier this month that it had launched an investigation into Mandelson. This was for allegations of misconduct in public office.

He then resigned from the House of Lords.

In a statement shortly after his arrest, the Met Police said:

Officers have arrested a 72-year-old man on suspicion of misconduct in public office.

He was arrested at an address in Camden on Monday, 23 February and has been taken to a London police station for interview.

This follows search warrants at two addresses in the Wiltshire and Camden areas.

Advertisement

For more coverage of the Epstein files that centres victims and survivors please click here.

Featured image via Sky News/YouTube

The term ‘woke’ is sometimes hard to define, and that’s become more true over time. Initially, the term was used to describe things like equality laws, charity, and activism. Now, right-wingers have overused it to the point that ‘woke’ is basically anything which doesn’t reflect them personally:

Can you guess their band name? pic.twitter.com/V0AvEtUHqA

— Anti Woke Memes (@AntiWokeMemes) February 20, 2026

The right will also describe anything to the left of their current position as ‘woke’. And this is a big problem for Reform UK, because the new party Restore is to their right.

In other words, Farage & co are the woke mob now.

And the right are gunning for London mayoral candidate Laila Cunningham in particular:

Difficult to see the difference between Laila and a typical leftist.

-Attacks the right
-Attacks Christianity
-Gets basic facts wrong
-Shouts a lot

It’s all there.pic.twitter.com/hCoEuq6j2F

— Nick Dixon (@NickDixon) February 22, 2026

Advertisement

Reform go woke

Firstly, we should point out that we don’t agree with any of the people we’re going to be referencing in this article. We’re enjoying watching them fight, though.

We should also say that we do think there’s a big difference between Cunningham and a “typical leftist”. In fact, we covered her debate with arch leftist Lowkey just yesterday – a debate in which Cunningham literally fled the scene. And if there’s any doubt if that was to do with her debating skills, here’s a quote from her argument:

And!?

And!?

Has he done any wrongdoing!?

Advertisement

And!?

And!?

Feel free to read the article, but the additional context doesn’t make her look better.

Getting into it, the right are mad at Cunningham because she said this:

Laila Cunningham slams Rupert Lowe: “British people will not vote for a party that believes you can only be British if you are WHITE and CHRISTIAN.”

Kevin O’Sullivan: “Rupert Lowe did NOT say that.”

🚨 PLANK OF THE WEEK: https://t.co/LceoDsDbgt@TVKev @policylaila @PCBarnes123 pic.twitter.com/6pFbRNWiU2

— Talk (@TalkTV) February 22, 2026

Regardless of the finer details, when Reform politicians like Cunningham attack Restore for being too far right, what they’re saying is Rupert Lowe & .co need to be more woke.

Her accusation comes from a point made by Restore spokesperson Charlie Downes:

Bad news if you’re white, British, and of no faith – according to this new political party, not even you are actually British. pic.twitter.com/C5vQCifgpU

— Ash Sarkar (@AyoCaesar) February 17, 2026

Although you can read what Downes said above, he has claimed he didn’t say it (or didn’t mean it?):

I actually can’t believe she’s doubling down on all this.

[Cunningham] has once again asserted that I said you have to be “white and Christian” in order to be British.

Advertisement

I have never said this, on TalkTV or elsewhere, and this is not Restore Britain’s position. If you want to know where we stand on these matters, look at our page.

Reform have again shown themselves to be incapable of engaging in good-faith debate, instead resorting to name-calling. Truly pathetic.

They should sack whoever is briefing Cunningham to stay these things. Dreadful messaging strategy.

There’s a problem for the Reform lot, though, and it’s that lots of people on the right agree that only white people can be British. Take weirdo Jess Gill for instance:

Charlie Downes said if you don’t have British ancestry then you’re not British.

I’m sorry but if I go to Japan and get really into Japanese culture, I’ll never be Japanese. That isn’t an insult. It’s just reality.

What do Reform actually believe in?

pic.twitter.com/1KQLWym5De

— Jess (@jessgill03) February 18, 2026

Advertisement

Carl ‘milkshake’ Benjamin described Reform as “fake meat”, which must burn if you’re a carvery warrior like Farage:

Reform YooKay is just a tepid, watered-down, weak sauce version of Restore Britain. They know what needs to be done, hence this containment policy, but lack the guts to actually do it.

Why would I choose fake meat when steak is on the menu? https://t.co/DH5WrFE074

— Carl Benjamin 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 (@Sargon_of_Akkad) February 22, 2026

Cunningham also labelled Restore ‘neo-Nazis’, which led to GB News apologising on her behalf:

I will not tolerate such vile lies about my team.

GB News did the right thing clarifying.

— Rupert Lowe MP (@RupertLowe10) February 22, 2026

It’s going to keep on kicking off too, because Farage is also calling these people ‘extremists’:

🧵Let me explain what is really going on:

Nigel Farage’s selective criticism of ethno nationalism is the stick with which he hopes to beat Rupert Lowe’s Restore Britain. It threatens to split the Reform UK vote – esp following Elon Musk’s endorsement of Restore/Lowe. 1/ https://t.co/FWCbgUn0yi

Advertisement

— Sangita Myska (@SangitaMyska) February 23, 2026

The following account is not someone we trust, but what they’re suggesting does feel like what’s happening. GB News have avoided talking about Restore, and the right wing host in the video below is clearly terrified she’ll be called ‘woke’ next:

I’m told GB News is in a bit of a panic about what to do with Restore Britain.

Many of their viewers support Restore but their cash cow @Nigel_Farage has previously all but banned coverage and platforming of @RupertLowe10 at GBN.

GBN are caught in a mess of their own making. https://t.co/6yFL1lPnEe

Advertisement

— Wolf 🐺 (@WorldByWolf) February 22, 2026

Making problems for Nigel

Gobshite Tommy Robinson has also spoken out against Reform, and what he’s pointing out isn’t wrong:

You see what happens when there is a party on Nigel’s arse, he’s forced to change . But I don’t believe a word reform say pic.twitter.com/FGnbsodIki

— Tommy Robinson 🇬🇧 (@TRobinsonNewEra) February 22, 2026

Reform can’t stand the thought of being the woke party, so they’re copying Restore. Restore will respond by moving even further right, and eventually Reform will have to accept that they’re woke now, or they’ll have to go so far right they become unelectable.

In the meantime, pass the popcorn.

Featured image via The Canary

What are the benefits of incline walking?

What about running?

So, which is best for me?

Reform UK have unveiled their new multi-pronged pledge to ‘restore Britain’s Christian heritage’. The far-right party plans to introduce a ‘patriotic’ Christian curriculum, as well as attaching listed status to church buildings to prevent them being turned into mosques.

Quite apart from this pointless reactionary nostalgia, the plans would spell the death of those same churches that Reform claims to value. Which is unsurprising really, given that the pack of liars and conmen that make up the party couldn’t actually give a fig about Christianity – beyond its usefulness in stirring up Islamophobia, of course.

‘More things to take pride in’

Reform presented its plans through newly appointed home affairs spokesman Zia Yusuf, as his first speech in the new role. In an interview with the Times beforehand, Yusuf – himself a Muslim born to Sri Lankan immigrants – called Christianity:

core to the history and the DNA of the country.

However, he went on to complain of the UK losing its Christian values:

What we’ve seen is that sense of high-trust society eroded quite rapidly, actually, and that’s in no small part because of the vast numbers of people who have arrived over a short period of time from low-trust societies. Some people might wince at that phrase, but it’s just obviously true.

To counter this perceived issue, Yusuf declared that his party would institute a “patriotic curriculum” centered on Christianity. This, he argued, would give children “more things to take pride in again”:

I think if politicians play their part, then I’m optimistic that over time … they will have more things to take pride in as they are made to feel proud of their history again, rather than being taught that they should be ashamed of [it].

As such, this curriculum would presumably be incredibly restricted. If children are meant to take pride in patriotic Christianity, they’ll presumably have to skip over the litany of atrocities committed by the British church.

This includes, but is by no means limited to, the witch hunts, the forced indoctrination of colonised peoples (and the legacy of homophobia it left behind), numerous pogroms against Jewish people in the UK, and, of course, all those crusades against Muslim nations in the Middle East?

Actually, who am I kidding? Reform would probably think all of that shit was something to be proud of.

Listed status

Along with this festering lump of a policy proposal, Yusuf also stated that Reform would thrust automatic listed status onto church buildings. This would both require their upkeep and prevent changes in their use.

The home affairs spokesman explained that this would prevent churches from being turned into mosques. Yusuf claimed he’d received emails from “anxious residents” complaining about this very phenomenon, and said that:

Regardless of whether somebody is of faith or not, or which faith they follow, I think the Christian heritage of this country is very important and protecting our heritage and our culture is important, otherwise the country is not a country, it’s just an economic zone.

And so, as one step in pursuit of that, we will end the incendiary practice of converting churches into mosques or any other places of worship by granting listed status automatically to all churches and prohibiting that.

The problem here (or one problem at least) is that it’s a policy designed to whip up the idea of Muslims rocking up and turfing out a bunch of active Christians from an in-use church. This couldn’t be further from the truth.

In the last decade alone, over 3500 churches have closed their doors. In turn, they’ve become pubs, clubs, gyms, apartments, and yes – other places of worship. The reasons behind the closures include declining attendance, falling income, and, in particular, the high cost of building maintenance.

In the 2021 census, the number of self-described Christians in England and Wales fell by 13% compared to the previous decade. This meant that Christians made up less than half of the population for the first time in the history of the census.

Empty, expensive and unused

However, for anyone who has attended church regularly in the last few decades, that decline has already been plainly visible. Whilst just under half of the population identify as Christian, only around 5% actually attend church.

Churches are closing, not because of Muslims immigrating to the UK, but because the buildings are old, expensive, and empty. What’s more, I think any representative of the church could have told Reform that, if they’d bothered to ask

Instead, the far-right party plans to burden an already-failing institution with the financial costs of maintaining listed churches. All the while, the buildings still sit idle, when they could instead gain new life and new use in the community – as places of worship or otherwise.

The move marks another step in Reform’s descent into a grim imitation of US-style Christofascism, nakedly motivated by Islamophobia. It’s a vain attempt to appeal to an imaginary, idealised, bygone era of a more homogeneously (white) Christian UK.

Oh, and it would be utterly ruinous to the very institution that Reform is paying lip-service to, to boot.

Featured image via the Canary

The Polanski-led Green Party will soon be voting on whether they should embed support for Palestinian resistance in their politics.

While Palestine is a distant country, it’s suffering is the direct result of actions taken by a close UK ally. Never mind Balfour, Britain’s ongoing involvement – from arms deals, bilateral trade, and media endorsements of Israel – means it’s responsible for the violence Palestinians experience daily.

Now, Israel has responded to the Green Party’s vocal opposition to its genocide in Gaza, condemning its leader. And its leader Zack Polanski has now let them know exactly what he thinks:

For years we’ve seen an ongoing genocide.

It’s been backed by right wing papers, the US President and by this Labour Government. pic.twitter.com/ESynwd21Ct

Advertisement

— Zack Polanski (@ZackPolanski) February 23, 2026

Anti-Zionism

As we reported on 28 January:

Pressure group Greens for Palestine is urging the Green Party to declare itself “an anti-Zionist party”. The group has issued a statement in support of a motion which it calls “groundbreaking”. The motion also supports the boycott, divestment and sanctions movement and calls for the de-proscription of Palestine Action.

The Green Party motion is ‘Motion A105: Zionism is Racism’, which calls for:

– The Green Party to declare itself an Anti-Zionist Party
– The Green Party rejects attempts to normalise the racist subjugation and oppression of Palestinians; to equate anti-Zionism with antisemitism; to deny or minimise Palestinian human rights; to create hierarchies of racism; and to normalise or attempt to justify apartheid, ethnic cleansing or genocide.
– To reject the IHRA and JDA definitions which have been weaponized to silence legitimate criticism of the state of Israel.
– Full Boycott and Divestment from Israel.
– The Green Party calls for the release of all Palestinian prisoners of conscience (including Marwan Barghouti)
– The Green Party to declare support for a single democratic Palestinian State with Jerusalem as its capital.
– The Green Party calls for the de-proscription of Palestine Action.
– The Green Party calls for the release of all political prisoners detained for non-violent direct action in support of Palestinian rights.

Independent journalist Matt Kennard has endorsed the motion:

Lubna Speitan—Palestinian Green Party member and a member of the Greens For Palestine Steering Group—has proposed this important motion for the Spring Conference.

I endorse all of it. It should all be Green Party policy. Basic stuff for a progressive party.

Motion A105:…

— Matt Kennard (@kennardmatt) January 26, 2026

The Zionist response

As reported by the Telegraph, Israeli foreign minister Sharren Haskel described the Greens’ proposal as “horrific”. They also called the Greens “a racist and hateful political party”, stating:

This Green Party motion is one of the most hateful and racist documents I’ve ever read. It calls for the destruction of Israel and seeks to justify terrorism against Israel.

Its intent is to justify the destruction of the Jewish homeland and deny the right of Jews to a national home. The double standards are extraordinary as they demand a national home for Palestinians but not Jews.

The other way to look at this is that the Greens aren’t calling for an end to Israel; they’re calling for an end to the Israel caging the Palestinians in an open air prison.

And as Polanski himself said, it’s hard to take the Israeli government seriously when we just watched them commit a genocide.

Featured image via the Canary