Apple’s iPhone 16 lineup is here. Though the base model iPhone 16 has taken a lot of the spotlight this year with the redesigned camera layout and amazing colors, the iPhone 16 Pro is a bit more iterative in terms of upgrades.
I personally bought an iPhone 16 Pro to upgrade from my iPhone 15 Pro. To be honest, though, if the iPhone 16 had a 1TB storage option, I would have gone that route. Since it doesn’t, I had to go with the iPhone 16 Pro, as much as I wanted a pink phone. But storage wasn’t the only reason — I also wanted the improved telephoto camera that I missed out on last year.
So, was going to the iPhone 16 Pro from the iPhone 15 Pro worth it? Let’s find out.
For one, the iPhone 16 Pro now has the 5x optical zoom that was previously only on the iPhone 15 Pro Max model last year, as Apple made the camera systems on both models equal this time.
Apple also improved the ultrawide camera on the iPhone 16 Pro, going to 48MP from the previous 12MP. This should mean better detail and resolution in your ultrawide shots, and macros can now be in full 48MP, too.
Advertisement
Though the main camera on both phones remains at 48MP, Apple rebranded the main camera on the iPhone 16 Pro to a “Fusion” camera rather than just “main” like it did before. Does this actually mean anything? We’ll see.
Since Apple made no improvements to the TrueDepth front camera (still 12MP and f/1.9 aperture on both), we’ll just be looking at the triple-lens camera system in this comparison. Ready? Let’s get started.
Again, the main camera on both the iPhone 16 Pro and iPhone 15 Pro is 48MP. But it’s now called the Fusion camera on the iPhone 16 Pro, rather than just the “main” camera like on the iPhone 15 Pro.
Let’s look at this image of a cute pumpkin carriage display at the Anaheim Majestic Garden Hotel. The most obvious difference between the two is the blue lights on the pumpkin carriage. With the iPhone 15 Pro image, the blue light bleeds into the orange of the pumpkin, making it look more blue than it actually is. The iPhone 16 Pro handles the light better, as the blue light doesn’t bleed out to the orange, and there’s more contrast.
The leaves at the bottom of the carriage and the green stem on top are also more vibrant in the iPhone 16 Pro, but the glittery leaf is more textured with the iPhone 15 Pro.
Advertisement
1.
iPhone 16 Pro
2.
iPhone 15 Pro
Here’s a cute little Halloween tree display at the hotel. Honestly, there isn’t a big difference between these two images. The iPhone 16 Pro may have captured a bit more of the tree detail in the shadows at the bottom of the tree (the silver specks) and have less bleeding for the lights, but the iPhone 15 Pro did a better job of making the colors at the top of the tree a tad more vibrant. Otherwise, they’re both pretty equal.
1.
iPhone 16 Pro
2.
iPhone 15 Pro
This is a fancy chef’s omakase plate I got for my wedding anniversary dinner at Hanagi Japanese Restaurant (highly recommend!) in Anaheim. Both images are very similar, but when you look closer, the iPhone 16 Pro is better. More of the nigiri sushi pieces are sharper and in focus, making it easier to see the texture. The color is also better with the iPhone 16 Pro, as evident with the tuna and salmon roe. But again, the differences are minimal unless you really scrutinize them.
1.
iPhone 16 Pro
2.
iPhone 15 Pro
This is a low-light shot featuring a serene little koi pond in the garden area of the Anaheim Majestic Garden Hotel. I took the photo around 8 p.m., and there were only a few of those lamps outside. Both images look good, but the iPhone 16 Pro is a bit more vivid with the color, especially the greenery in the background. Overall, they’re pretty equal.
This year, Apple made big improvements to the ultrawide camera, bumping it up to 48MP, which is what many flagship Android phones have nowadays. Apple also improved the sensors, which means it should be able to capture better ultrawide shots in low light. But does it really?
1.
iPhone 16 Pro
2.
iPhone 15 Pro
I used the ultrawide camera to capture the full spooky armor and dress display. Both photos look the same on the surface, aside from the slight difference in overall tone. The details are similar even when you zoom in to examine it closer. I was expecting more from the iPhone 16 Pro here, but that didn’t turn out to be the case.
1.
iPhone 16 Pro
2.
iPhone 15 Pro
This is a better case for the improvements to the ultrawide camera on the iPhone 16 Pro. I snapped this ultrawide shot of the koi pond at the hotel at night, and the iPhone 16 Pro version captured more light. The iPhone 16 Pro also handles the light better, as it doesn’t appear blown out like the iPhone 15 Pro image.
1.
iPhone 16 Pro
2.
iPhone 15 Pro
Here’s an ultrawide shot of Monstro on the Storybook Canals ride at Disneyland. Both iPhones handled the scene similarly, but the colors are a bit more vibrant in the iPhone 15 Pro image than the iPhone 16 Pro. It’s evident in the trees, the water, and Monstro himself. In terms of detail, both are about equal.
1.
iPhone 16 Pro
2.
iPhone 15 Pro
Now, let’s try some macro photos. Here’s a closeup of a flower’s pistil. The iPhone 16 Pro image is much clearer and brighter with the color. However, the iPhone 15 Pro version handled the contrast better, which I prefer a bit more. But as far as how everything is in focus, the iPhone 16 Pro takes the cake.
1.
iPhone 16 Pro
2.
iPhone 15 Pro
Let’s try another macro shot of a different flower. The difference between these two images is much more apparent. Once again, the iPhone 16 Pro version is crystal clear and in focus, while the iPhone 15 Pro image has a lot of distortion and blurriness. You can even see a bug on the bottom petal much more easily with the iPhone 16 Pro.
Last year, only the iPhone 15 Pro Max got the 5x optical zoom telephoto camera, as the iPhone 15 Pro had just up to 3x. But this year, Apple made the two Pro models equal in terms of camera features, so does that 5x optical zoom really make that much of a difference?
Advertisement
1.
iPhone 16 Pro
2.
iPhone 15 Pro
Here’s a 5x zoomed-in shot of some buildings I can see across the street from the park. Since the iPhone 15 Pro uses a digital crop for its 5x zoom, the loss of detail is pretty clear when you look closely at it. For example, the texture in the wall of the beige townhomes is barely visible, whereas you can clearly see it with the iPhone 16 Pro’s 5x zoom. Other details, like the tree, also appear soft in the iPhone 15 Pro, while they’re clear with the iPhone 16 Pro.
1.
iPhone 16 Pro
2.
iPhone 15 Pro
I snapped another quick 5x zoom shot of some palm trees in my neighborhood. Both images look similar, but if you look a little closer, you’ll be able to see the sharpness of the leaves in the iPhone 16 Pro version, whereas they appear softer in the other. It looks like the iPhone 15 Pro also made the sky appear a more vibrant blue, which you may or may not prefer.
1.
iPhone 16 Pro
2.
iPhone 15 Pro
A half-moon was still out this morning, so I decided to try to see how well the zoom on both iPhones would do with it. Of course, the 5x zoom doesn’t give you a ton of detail of the moon, but you can at least make out the moon’s surface as best you can on the iPhone 16 Pro. With the iPhone 15 Pro, it’s much more fuzzy and harder to make out the different surface shades.
1.
iPhone 16 Pro
2.
iPhone 15 Pro
This is an interesting one. I decided to try a 3x zoom image since that’s the maximum optical zoom range for the iPhone 15 Pro. Since the iPhone 16 Pro only has 2x or 5x optical zoom, but up to 25x digital zoom, it uses digital zoom for 3x. For the iPhone 15 Pro, it has 3x optical zoom but not 5x. So this time, the tables have turned — the iPhone 16 Pro’s digital 3x zoom is not great compared to the iPhone 15 Pro’s 3x optical zoom. The left side of the rose garden looks dull and lifeless on the iPhone 16 Pro but is vibrant and crisp on the iPhone 15 Pro.
If you’re still using an iPhone 15 Pro, this isn’t a recommendation to replace it right now with an iPhone 16 Pro. While the cameras are an improvement over last year, it’s still a pretty iterative upgrade, and unless you really care about the tiny details, it’s probably not worth it (for most people).
However, if you really want the 5x optical zoom that was missing last year and you enjoy taking ultrawide and macro shots, then the iPhone 16 Pro is worth considering. But for the main camera, which is likely to be the one that most people use the most, there’s very little difference, and not enough to justify the money to upgrade.
So, what’s the conclusion? If the telephoto and ultrawide cameras are your top priority, there’s a case for upgrading. But if you can do without those upgrades, and the main camera is your main concern, you can safely sit this one out.
Around the corner is perhaps one of the most important elections this nation has ever seen, yet many people are still unaware of the details needed to cast informed ballots.
It’s not necessarily their fault — some voting information can be quite hard to find, especially when it comes to learning about, say, the political stances of judges up for recall or what a certain new amendment might mean for everyday life. In a very Silicon Valley way, there is an app looking to help with that called MyBallot AI, an interactive mobile platform to help make voting information more accessible.
All a user has to do is type into a chat box what they want to know about any upcoming elections and they will receive real-time answers to their questions.
The app, founded by Mark Larman, was publicly launched on Friday. It is powered by Google Gemini and sources its data from the Google Civic API and the BallotReady API. A little noteworthy feature is that the app reveals its sources when responding with information, perhaps as a way to avoid the plagiarism accusations that have plagued other chatbots.
Advertisement
On MyBallot, users can also fill out a sample ballot so they can start to familiarize themselves with the language on the ballot. Larman said he hired a developer back in February and “it just feels like a blessing to have it finally ready in time for the election.”
This app comes at a critical time. Misinformation remains a concern among voters this election and one person in particular is causing a stir for election officials: Elon Musk. CNN reports that states are trying to fact-check the billionaire to stop him from spreading claims that will “mislead voters.” Meanwhile, Axios reported that Facebook users are falling for AI images of fake people giving endorsements, with a flood of AI-generated content — including video and audio — taking hold over the internet. All of this, paired with the fact that search engines have deprioritized news, makes it hard for the average voter to find credible information about voting.
Mark Larman, founder of MyBallot AI. Image Credits:Courtesy of Mark Larman
Larman says he’s wanted to build an app like this since the 2020 election. He spent time that year protesting the murder of George Floyd and, when he found himself in the voting booth, he recalled looking at the ballot and not recognizing who any of the judges were.
“I was out there protesting and then when it came time to vote I didn’t even know which of these judges was for us or against us,” he said.
He spent the next three years thinking about creating a product that could effectively educate voters. When access to artificial intelligence was democratized, he took that opportunity to start building MyBallot AI. Now, he’s in the process of fundraising and still works at his day job as he builds the app.
Advertisement
“The app is especially important now to exist as a verifiably non-biased source for information,” he continued, adding that voters feel like news right now is biased. “If people weren’t so uninformed and knew more about the issues and candidates they were voting for instead of just voting for the team, they’d feel less like they got cheated or lied to.”
Many young people are also taking to the polls for the first time. Efforts are made each election to engage young voters, who are less likely to vote than older people. Tufts estimates that in 2020, 50% of young people (considered between the ages of 18 to 29) voted in the presidential election, an increase from 39% in 2016.
Larman thinks young people are going to come out this election, pointing out that the youth are very active in politics, “but, on the other hand, they may be the least likely to take the effort to navigate the existing non-user friendly websites to learn about state and local elections and they certainly aren’t interested in reading any 100-page voting manuals sent to their house.”
MyBallot right now can be used anywhere in the U.S., though it says it has plans to expand to other countries soon.
Advertisement
Larman has other big plans for the app, too. He aims to build a networking component so that users will be able to directly ask questions to candidates running for office — he will start reaching out to representatives after the presidential election, just in time for the midterms. To boost engagement, Larman also hopes to add political quizzes that can then help give ballot recommendations and work with organizations and universities to reach even more voters.
“I want people to trust it as a tool that doesn’t necessarily care what you think, we just want you to think,” he said.
Epic Games is about to host big in-game event ahead of its next throwback season — and it could be pretty musical.
If you want to watch the event, here’s what you need to know.
The Remix: The Prelude event is set to kick off at 6:30PM ET / 3:30PM PT. Epic suggests logging in early so that you don’t miss the event; events have reached capacity in the past.
If you’re in the game, jump into a Battle Royale or Zero Build match ahead of the event’s start time and head to the Restored Reels location.
Advertisement
If you aren’t able to watch in-game, there will almost certainly be a bunch of streamers live-streaming the show, so check Twitch or YouTube to find one to watch.
Cybercriminals are attacking surveillance cameras from multiple manufacturers, leveraging two zero-day vulnerabilities to take over the endpoints, watch and manipulate the feeds, and more.
Cybersecurity researchers GreyNoise claim to have spotted the attacks after their AI-powered analysis tool Sift raised an alarm that crooks are attacking network device interface-enabled (NDI) pan-tilt-zoom (PTZ) cameras from multiple manufacturers.
The cameras can be found in different environments, including industrial and manufacturing plants, where they are used for machinery surveillance, and quality control. They can also be found in business conferences, used for high-definition video streaming and remote presentations, in healthcare (used for telehealth consultations and surgical live streams), state and local government environments, including courtrooms, and houses of worship, where they’re used for live streaming.
Waiting on patches
GreyNoise says the affected devices are typically high-cost, with some models costing several thousand dollars.
Advertisement
Affected devices use VHD PTZ camera firmware < 6.3.40 used in PTZOptics, Multicam Systems SAS, and SMTAV Corporation devices based on Hisilicon Hi3516A V600 SoC V60, V61, and V63.
The vulnerabilities in question are now tracked as CVE-2024-8956, and CVE-2024-8957. The former is deemed critical (9.1), and the latter high (7.2). When exploited, the vulnerabilities can be used to completely take over the cameras, view and manipulate video feeds, disable different camera operations, and assimilate the devies into a botnet.
While for some models, patches have already been released, others remain vulnerable. According to BleepingComputer, PTZOptics released a security update on September 17, but since multiple models reached end-of-life status (PT20X-NDI-G2 and PT12X-NDI-G2) not all were patched. Furthermore, PT20X-SE-NDI-G3, and PT30X-SE-NDI-G3 are still pending a fix.
Sign up to the TechRadar Pro newsletter to get all the top news, opinion, features and guidance your business needs to succeed!
Advertisement
Chances are, the list of affected models is a lot longer than what the researchers determined at this time. Users are advised to check with their manufacturer if they’ve released a fix for the abovementioned flaws.
You haven’t fully shopped the best headphone deals until you’ve had a look at everything Beats has to offer. It’s one of the most popular headphone brands on the planet, but unlike Bose headphone deals and even Sony headphone deals, Beats headphone deals often turn out some significant price drops. Whether you’re looking for an in-ear option or a set of the best wireless headphones Beats has you covered, and we’ve got you covered when it comes to the check-out line. Below you’ll find all of the best Beats headphone deals. They include some substantial discounts on the Beats Studio 3 and Powerbeats Pro headphones, but if you’d like to consider some other options be sure to check out what’s going on among today’s best AirPods deals, best AirPods Pro deals, and best AirPods Max deals.
If you want to go for a pair of true wireless earbuds there are quite a few good options from Beats. There are some excellent deals on budget options, including some deals on refurbished Beats Studio Buds. One of the higher end options is the Beats Powerbeats Pro, which are seeing a great price drop right now.
If over-the-ear headphones are your listening preference, there’s plenty of savings in store on a new set of Beats. The Beats Solo 3 headphones are pretty much a regular when it comes to Beats deals, and that’s the case right now as well. You’ll also find some pretty impressive price drops on the Beats Studio 3 and Beats Studio Pro headphones.
What it all boils down to when picking either AirPods or Beats is what your budget is. In almost every straight comparison between an AirPods product or a Beats product, the AirPods will always win, like for example, when comparing the Studio Pro vs. Apple AirPods Max. That said, the AirPods Max is a couple of hundred dollars more expensive, and this will hold true of pretty much all AirPods to Beats comparisons. So, ultimately, if you can afford an AirPod, that’s generally the better audio quality, but if you feel that it’s out of your budget range, the Beats are cheaper and are essentially just as good.
In case you don’t know what Claude is, it’s one of the major competitors to ChatGPT and Gemini. Just like those two platforms, Claude has different models of varying capabilities. There’s the Sonnet model and the Haiku model. You can use the former model for free on the dedicated website. Haiku, on the other hand, requires a paid membership.
Claude now has a desktop app
Just recently, Anthropic announced that Claude now has the ability to perform actions on your computer by itself. Well, the desktop app doesn’t grant Claude that ability. What it does is give users a quick and easy way to access the chatbot. Just like the smartphone app, it provides a simple interface that lets you use the chatbot.
Claude’s interface isn’t very different from most other chatbot interfaces. The star of the show is the text field. You’ll see your conversation fill the screen as you write.
Advertisement
If you don’t have anything in the text field, you’ll see various other UI elements floating around. Right under the text field, you’ll see your recent conversations. The app will show up to six recent conversations unless you click on the View all button.
In between the text field and the recent conversations, you’ll see recent updates and news regarding Claude. Each bit of news will sit in a rounded rectangular button, and they’ll be stacked on one another. If you click on one of them, then you’ll be taken to a webpage on your default browser.
Just like most other chatbots, there’s a panel on the left of the screen that will list your recent conversations and let you access your account settings. To see your account settings, click on your name at the bottom of the panel.
Up top, you’ll see the menu that will have the File, Edit, View, and Help sections (if you’re using the Windows application). Clicking on the Settings button from the File menu will let you change the keyboard shortcut. This shortcut will summon a little floating text field.
Advertisement
The application is available for free. You’ll have to sign in to use it, but you’ll be able to use it even if you’re a free user.
There’s a new Star Wars show coming out in just over a month. Star Wars: Skeleton Crew premieres on December 3 with two episodes on Disney+. The streamer just released a brand-new trailer to prove it.
For the uninitiated, this is a live action show set during the same time period as and , or around ten years after the events of Return of the Jedi. We don’t know too much about the plot, other than it involves some suburban kids finding a spaceship and going on an adventure.
If that reminds you of some classic flicks from the 1980s, you aren’t alone. The whole thing seems to be an homage to Steven Spielberg, Amblin and the vast array of kid-friendly adventures from that decade. People have been calling it “Goonies in space,” but a more modern reference would be “Stranger Things in space.”
The trailer also showcases one of the things I’m personally most interested in with this show. Some of it is set in settled planets, likely core worlds such as Coruscant. There are suburban neighborhoods and schools. There are people going to work. We haven’t gotten many looks as to how regular people live in a galaxy far, far away. That’s my jam, right there.
Advertisement
The showrunners here are Jon Watts and Christopher Ford, who made the recent Spider-Man movies for the MCU. The cast is primarily composed of unknown kids, including an elephant alien who may or may not be related to Mos Espa band leader Max Rebo. However, Jude Law is in it. He’s likely playing a Jedi, though there could be a twist there.
You must be logged in to post a comment Login