Ethan Nwaneri and Myles Lewis-Skelly have both struggled for game time at Arsenal this season (Picture: Getty)
Perry Groves believes the emergence of Max Dowman will prompt the departures of several big-name Arsenal players in the summer transfer window.
The intense competition for places in Arsenal’s midfield and forward line has already prompted Mikel Arteta to sanction Ethan Nwaneri’s loan to Marseille.
Captain Martin Odegaard’s place in the team is far from secure give his questionable form allied to Eberechi Eze’s brace in last weekend’s north London derby.
Dowman, meanwhile, became the youngest player in the club’s history earlier this season when he made his debut against Leeds United but an ankle injury has ruled the teenager out of action for the past few months.
Advertisement
Whether the 16-year-old, who returned to training earlier this month, will play a part in the run-in remains to be seen but Groves is confident his undeniable talent will eventually force other players out of the club.
‘The thing is though, you won’t have to fit them all in,’ Groves told talkSPORT when contemplating the selection headaches Mikel Arteta is facing on a weekly basis.
‘Because there will be a few that will be gone at the end of the season.
Your football fix
Metro‘s Head of Sport James Goldman delivers punchy analysis, transfer talk and his take on the week’s biggest stories direct to your inbox every week.
‘The squad is that strong, and there will be new faces that come in, so there will be a few that will be surplus to requirements.’
Advertisement
Groves continued: ‘They all want to go and play.
‘Like you mentioned, Nwaneri, if you’re talking about the inside where he wants to play…
‘You’ve got Eze, Odegaard, then Max Dowman who is unbelievable, trust me.
‘So then Nwaneri quite rightly will be thinking, ‘I want to go and play.”
Advertisement
Ethan Nwaneri is currently on loan at Marseille (Picture: Reuters)
Viktor Gyokeres, meanwhile, believes Arsenal’s statement derby win against Tottenham was the ‘perfect response’ to silence the club’s critics.
Gyokeres and Eberechi Eze both scored twice to secure a 4-1 triumph over Spurs just four days after Arsenal were rocked by a 2-2 draw at Wolves.
The dropped points at Molineux led to questions about Arsenal’s title mentality. However, their performance against Tottenham – which took them five points clear of Manchester City at the top of the Premier League – went some way to silencing the doubters.
Viktor Gyokeres scored twice in Arsenal’s 4-1 win over Tottenham (Picture: Getty)
And Gyokeres, who extended his league tally to the season for 10, said: ‘It’s always going to be difficult when you get a result like we had at Wolves, but it’s how you handle that, and how you respond to it, and today we showed that it in a good way.
‘To get this result and this performance, it was the perfect way to respond. So, it’s a good sign.
‘The thing is, that we have to keep showing it in the next game and the game after that.
Advertisement
‘There’s a lot of games to go. But if we perform like this, it’s going to be good, for sure.’
Polanski has called for the UK to leave the defence alliance, urged Britain to wean itself off its reliance on the United States and consider expelling American forces from British bases.
Meanwhile prime minister Keir Starmer is trying to hold the alliance together just one month after Nato-sceptic Donald Trump threatened to invade Greenland.
European leaders are also relying on the strength of Nato to deter Vladimir Putin from attacking countries beyond Ukraine, where the alliance’s eastern flank is.
Advertisement
But Polanski told HuffPost UK: “The prime minister has moved much closer to my position [on Nato].
“In fact, the speech he gave in Munich last week could have easily been a speech I gave six months to a year ago.”
Starmer told the Munich security conference that it was time to “build a stronger Europe and a more European Nato” to combat Russian aggression at a time when Trump is turning away from the alliance.
The PM also used the speech to hit out at “the peddlers of easy answers” who who are “soft on Russia, weak on Nato” – an attack on both the Greens and Reform UK.
Advertisement
Polanski said Starmer appeared to be “ridiculing me for my Nato position,” even though he wants to set an alternative alliance which has British security “at the heart”.
“It feels he’s accepting the fundamentals of what I was saying but at the same time still trying to use desperate political attacks rather than actually deal with the substance, which is Trump is unpredictable and dangerous,” he said. “He’s not an ally at this point.”
Polanski continued: “Starmer has realised banging on about the special relationship with a president who is so clearly uninterested in the UK and our security was no longer tenable. So I think he’s moved to the right position.”
A Labour spokesperson rejected these claims, calling the remarks “delusional”.
Advertisement
They said: “Zack Polanski’s claim is delusional and is just further proof that the Greens cannot be trusted with our national security.
“While Putin wages an illegal war in Ukraine, the Green Party wants to take Britain out of Nato and leave our country isolated and exposed.
“Labour will always stand firm with our allies, uphold our commitments to Nato, and defend democracy and the rule of law.”
Polanski also claimed that his previous claims that the UK should negotiate directly with Putin over Russia’s nuclear powers have been “mischaracterised as sitting down and having a friendly chat”.
Advertisement
Insisting that he does care about national security, he said: “Sanctions are a part of diplomatic relationships. I think there’s still more we could be doing around showing global leadership in terms of the rest of Europe.”
“I think there’s still more we could be doing around sanctions,” Polanski said. “Once you’ve exhausted every possible option, then you ask for the further military question too.”
“I think there’s a principle at stake here that is we should never rush to more war, we should never rush to more weapons, we should never look at saying we’re done with diplomacy, because actually there’s been lots of times in the past where it’s felt like hope has totally been lost with other countries.”
I have watched two sides of the same Democratic party navigate this exact issue (Picture: Nathan Posner/Anadolu via Getty Images)
For years, Democrats have leaned on Michelle Obama’s famous line, ‘When they go low, we go high.’
As an ethos, it’s noble and dignified, but it’s also politically nullifying – because in the current climate dynamic, those who live by it may occupy the moral highground, but they don’t control the battlefield.
Thus for so many years now we’ve seen Donald Trump’s Republicans define the narrative, while Democrats take solace from the fact that they’re playing by the rules.
That ‘go high’ mentality confers moral superiority, sure, but it does not confer power. And as we all know, power is basically all that matters in politics.
Advertisement
For the best part of a decade, I have watched two sides of the same Democratic party navigate this exact issue.
Because what we witnessed on Tuesday was not about a speech, Trump’s strongman leadership, or even the USA.
Last night’s rambling, record-breaking State of the Union Address brought the divide between those two sides into sharp focus (Picture: Andrew Caballero-Reynolds / AFP via Getty Images)
It was about a Democratic party at a crossroads. One side committing to the ‘We go high’ rules. The other embracing the chaotic liberation of ‘When they go low, we raise hell’.
Advertisement
Treading a well-worn path was Chuck Schumer and Elizabeth Warren, applauding at points, rising politely, behaving as though this were just another presidential address.
Except it wasn’t. It really wasn’t.
Because blazing an unrepentantly contrarian trail were Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Ilhan Omar and Rashida Tlaib refusing to play Trump’s game – choosing instead to respectively boycott, protest, and reject the absurd spectacle.
But parts of the Democratic Party still responded as though this were a serious policy address delivered in good faith.
Vice Chair of the Senate Ethics Committee and senator of almost 16 years, Chris Coons, said he hoped for a ‘brief and unifying speech’.
Advertisement
To expect brevity and unity from Donald Trump is like expecting to win a gunfight with a bunch of flowers.
He attempted to speak solemnly – for a record-breaking 107 minutes in total – about law and order, and the threat of immigrants poisoning American communities.
It’s pretty galling to hear a man with 34 criminal convictions who’s been found liable for fraud and sexual abuse lecturing the country about morality.
American citizens have been caught up in raids by Trump’s aggressive Immigrations and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers (Picture: John Moore/Getty Images)
And when he declared that the first duty of the American government is to protect citizens, I could only speculate about who exactly that applied to.
A situation where armed federal agents in tactical gear and balaclavas turn up at homes before dawn, plunging entire communities into paralysing fear and sometimes targeting the wrong people.
More than 68,000 people have been taken into custody. More than 30 have died.
I could go on, but the point is that the gap between his rhetoric and reality is – and always has been – titanic.
What approach should the Democratic Party take to address Donald Trump’s political tactics?
Maintain dignity and the ‘go high’ ethos
Advertisement
Adopt a more confrontational approach
Combine both strategies for balance
Stay up to date with the stories everybody’s talking about by signing up to Metro’s News Updates newsletter.
Advertisement
Donald Trump is a political force who thrives on rewriting the rules. The speed at which revered institutions have bent, broken, caved and capitulated in his second term has been breathtaking.
He has never operated within norms, nor does he fear outrage, or retreat when scolded – we have the whole of his first term to know that.
Anyone still clinging to the idea that behaving properly, respecting institutions and demonstrating civility will somehow restore normality are delusional.
Advertisement
It would be pure folly to think that a strongly worded letter, or a show of bipartisanship, might inspire him to change course.
It hasn’t worked up to this point. It’s not working now. It will never work.
They recognise that Trump is not an irregularity that can be corrected by etiquette and the modelling of good behaviour (Picture: Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
That was proven even before Tuesday’s speech, when Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer pleaded with Trump to ‘make his case’ on potentially striking Iran.
We all know that any action in the Middle East will mirror his Venezuela raid, and almost his entire foreign policy – chaotic, violent, and potentially illegal.
So to resort to cliché, it’s crunch time. This Democratic generational divide is undeniable, and it’s necessary. It’s not about style. It is about diagnosis.
Advertisement
Because while I have deep respect for the older guard of centre-left American politics, from Biden to Warren, who have contributed immeasurably, their time was forged in a different political era.
We need to recognise this cohort of younger Democrats for what it is (Picture: Tyrone Siu/REUTERS)
The younger generation of Democrats is often caricatured as theatrical, unserious and untested, but it instinctively grasps that standing up to applaud, nodding along to platitudes, and expressing disappointment at the lack of unity simply feeds the illusion that any of this is somehow normal.
They recognise that Trump is not an irregularity that can be corrected by etiquette and the modelling of good behaviour.
Instead, they understand that they need to match his force, clarity and narrative, upholding their principles while also getting down in the dirt to fight.
The rest of us have already realised that times have changed. The question has never been about whether Trump will change. It’s whether the Democrats will.
Advertisement
Don’t get me wrong, I am not arguing for a race to the bottom. Lord knows Trump has already kickstarted that.
But we need to recognise this cohort of younger Democrats for what they are: the only feasible route to success and the only realistic chance of strategic dominance the party so desperately needs.
The Democrats can keep the slogan. But in 2026, ‘when they go low’ cannot mean surrendering power to keep peace. It has to mean getting in the arena.
Bill Gates has apologized to staff at his charitable foundation over his past friendship with Jeffrey Epstein, also admitting to two extramarital affairs, according to a report.
“To be clear, I never spent any time with victims, the women around him,” Gates said while apologizing to foundation executives for introducing them into Epstein’s orbit.
“It was a huge mistake to spend time with Epstein. I apologize to other people who are drawn into this because of the mistake that I made,” he said.
Advertisement
The tech entrepreneur turned philanthropist explained that he first met the pedophile in 2011, three years after Epstein had pleaded guilty to soliciting a minor for prostitution in Florida, but that he had not looked into the financier’s background and was only dimly aware of an “18-month thing” that limited his travel.
Bill Gates has expressed his regret at ever knowing Jeffrey Epstein and says he ended contact with him in 2014 (AP)
He acknowledged that his then-wife, Melinda Gates, had expressed concern about Epstein in 2013, but that he had ignored her caution and continued to see him socially.
“Knowing what I know now makes it, you know, a hundred times worse in terms of not only his crimes in the past, but now it’s clear there was ongoing bad behavior,” Gates said, according to the WSJ.
Advertisement
Alluding to his ex-wife, he added: “To give her credit, she was always kind of skeptical about the Epstein thing.”
Gates continued to map out the course of their relationship, saying he had met with Epstein in 2011, taken trips on his private jet and spent time with him in Germany, France, New York, and Washington, but “never stayed overnight” at his properties or visited Little St James, his now-notorious private Caribbean island.
He said he did not see Epstein again after 2014, although there were “ancillary issues” that Epstein continued to email him about, but Gates said he chose not to respond to them.
Advertisement
Epstein died in a New York City jail cell in August 2019 (New York State Division of Criminal Justice)
Gates also said the women pictured with him in the files were Epstein’s assistants, whom the billionaire had asked to pose with him.
He said he had been drawn to Epstein initially because he “talked about the kind of intimate relationship he had with a lot of billionaires, particularly Wall Street billionaires,” whom, he said, could help Gates with his fundraising goals, which “made it easier for me to feel like this was a normalized situation.”
“It definitely is the opposite of the values of the foundation and the goals of the foundation,” Gates admitted. “And our work is very reputation-sensitive. I mean, people can choose to work with us or not work with us.”
A Gates Foundation spokesperson told The Independent: “This was a scheduled town hall with employees, which Bill does twice a year. In the conversation, Bill answered questions submitted by foundation staff on a range of issues, including the release of the Epstein files, the foundation’s work in AI, and the future of global health.
Advertisement
“In the town hall, Bill spoke candidly, addressing several questions in detail, and took responsibility for his actions.”
Gates posing for a photograph with a woman whose identity has been redacted, as seen in the recent Department of Justice release of files pertaining to Epstein (DOJ)
During the town hall, the billionaire also admitted to two affairs.
“I did have affairs, one with a Russian bridge player who met me at bridge events, and one with a Russian nuclear physicist who I met through business activities,” he said.
Advertisement
Melinda Gates spoke to NPR’s Wild Card podcast earlier this month about the release of the Epstein files and told host Rachel Martin that the scandal “brings back memories of some very, very painful times” in her marriage.
The couple, who have three children, divorced in 2021 after 27 years together.
Martin asked her guest about one of the emails released by the DOJ that suggested her former husband had sought treatment for a sexually transmitted infection and planned to supply it to his ex-wife too without her knowledge, asking what her “dominant emotion” was when she first heard about it, to which she answered: “Just unbelievable sadness.”
Advertisement
Melinda Gates speaking to NPR’s ‘Wild Card’ podcast earlier this month about the Epstein scandal and the end of her 27-year marriage (NPR)
A spokesperson for Bill Gates has vehemently denied the allegations in question and previously told The Independent: “These claims are absolutely absurd and completely false.
“The only thing these documents demonstrate is Epstein’s frustration that he did not have an ongoing relationship with Gates and the lengths he would go to entrap and defame.”
Unlike other powerful men linked to Epstein, Gates has shown a commendable willingness to speak frankly about his past mistakes.
“Every minute I spent with him, I regret, and I apologise that I did that,” he recently told Australia’s 9News, adding that he was “foolish to spend time with him” and is “one of many people who regret ever knowing him.”
Advertisement
“The more that comes out, the more clear it will be that, although the time was a mistake, it has nothing to do with that kind of behaviour,” he added.
A federal judge reprimanded Donald Trump’s administration for claiming that an immigrant seeking his release from custody was convicted for marijuana possession in 2009 — when he was 4 years old.
To support arguments for the man’s ongoing detention and removal from the country, government lawyers attached a document from Immigration and Customs Enforcement that they “indicated” was related to his criminal history.
They submitted the document in court filings “despite the differences in birthdate, birthplace, parents’ names, and immigration status,” West Virginia District Judge Irene Berger noted in her order to release him on Tuesday.
“This sloppiness further validates the Court’s concerns about the procedures utilized by the Respondents depriving people present in the United States of their liberty,” she wrote.
ICE officials submitted a document purporting to show an immigrant seeking his release was convicted for marijuana possession — when he was 4 years old (Getty Images)
Judges within the last week have held at least two government attorneys in civil contempt for failing to follow orders in immigration cases, according to documents reviewed by The Independent.
Last week, Minnesota District Judge Laura M. Provinzino held a federal prosecutor in civil contempt for “flagrant disobedience of court orders” in the case of a noncitizen swept up in Trump’s surge of immigration officers in the state.
Advertisement
Provinzino ordered Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Matthew Isihara to pay $500 a day until the government returned a man’s identification documents after his release. The contempt was purged after his documents were returned.
This week, Trump appointee Judge Eric C. Tostrud of Minnesota found the administration in civil contempt for transferring an ICE detainee to Texas in violation of his order and then releasing him without his belongings.
The judge ordered the administration to refund him $568 for the cost of a plane ticket home.
Advertisement
Lawyers defending Kristi Noem’s DHS are battling an overwhelming number of immigration lawsuits and failing to keep up with court orders (REUTERS)
The administration’s attempts to arrest and deport tens of thousands of people from the country — without giving them much of a chance to fight their cases before they’re indefinitely jailed in immigration detention centers — have triggered an avalanche of lawsuits that are overwhelming courts and prosecutors.
Dozens of new habeas corpus petitions — the lawsuits immigrants have filed to challenge the constitutionality of their arrest and detention — are hitting court dockets every week. Government attorneys are overwhelmed or quitting in droves under pressure to fight them at an unsustainable pace.
Judges have argued that it’s a crisis of the administration’s own making.
Officials “have chosen to avail themselves of these exact circumstances of which they now complain,” wrote California District Judge Sunshine Sykes, whose order this month commanded the government to let detainees challenge their detentions.
Advertisement
In New Jersey, government lawyers recently admitted to violating roughly 50 orders stemming from more than 500 cases.
Julie Le, a lawyer for ICE who was drafted to help with the caseload in the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Minnesota, was removed from that detail days after her outburst in court.
The same month, Minnesota’s chief federal judge ripped into the administration after he found ICE violated nearly 100 court orders stemming from the recent surge of officers into the state, or “more court orders in January 2026 than some federal agencies have violated in their entire existence.”
Advertisement
“ICE has every right to challenge the orders of this court,” wrote Judge Patrick J. Schiltz. “But, like any litigant, ICE must follow those orders unless and until they are overturned or vacated.”
Officials at the Justice Department and DHS have labeled judges “activists” and “rogue” members of the judiciary in public statements criticizing the decisions but have rarely appealed them.
If you’re a nervous solo traveller, it could help ease your mind (Picture: Getty)
Cabin crew travel for a living, so we tend to trust their advice on making the most of our trips.
And this flight attendant’s top tip could be an invaluable one, especially if you’re travelling alone.
Esther Sturrus, who works for Dutch airline KLM and shares TikToks about her journeys, recommends always throwing a water bottle under the bed when you get into a hotel room.
Although unlikely, tourists can be targeted by thieves or intruders, with some travellers choosing to be vigilant in certain countries or in rooms on lower floors.
Advertisement
According to Esther, her hack lets you ‘check that no one is under the bed without looking’, easing your mind if you’re wary.
She advises rolling the bottle under the bed, adding in her video that it ‘has to come out on the other side’. If it doesn’t, you may want to exercise caution.
Best of Metro Deals
Get exclusive discounts with Metro Deals – save on getaways and spa days. Powered by Wowcher
Bannatyne Spa: Spa day for two with treatments, lunch & prosecco — save up to 57% off.
Bear in mind that an obstruction doesn’t necessarily mean there’s someone hiding underneath your bed.
Advertisement
It could just as easily be where spare sheets are stored, or you didn’t throw the bottle hard enough to get it right across to the other side.
That said, it doesn’t hurt to check, and you’ll sleep better knowing you’ve done your due diligence.
Esther’s followers praised the tip, including one person who called it ‘super useful’. Another said that a new fear had been ‘unlocked’ by the revelation, while a third called it a ‘crazy’ though.
The rest of the flight attendant’s hotel hacks were more lighthearted, though, from using a hairdryer to clear a steamed-up mirror to turning over a paper cup and poking a hole in the bottom to hygienically hold your toothbrush.
Advertisement
Metro previously asked cabin crew for their insider tips on having the best possible flight. This is what we found out.
How to get upgraded on a flight
‘As far as travel tips are concerned, my number one tip for those looking to get upgraded (and treated like royalty) on a flight is to be lovely to the cabin crew,’ Hannah Murphey, former flight attendant and director of Globe Fit Ltdtold Metro.
‘A smile and eye contact upon boarding goes a long way. Chat to the crew and ask them about their job. I used to love it when passengers showed an interest in me and were kind opposed to demanding.
‘I wanted to then go out of my way to ensure that they have the very best flight, so I would move their seats if there was a better one available – and I would give them extra drinks etc. purely because they had showed me kindness.
Advertisement
‘When passengers are rude and expectant it has the opposite effect.’
Essentially, a little kindness really does go a long way.
Choose the best seats
If you’re in a position to choose where you’re sitting on the plane – make sure you think about that decision.
‘Go for a seat just forward of the wing for a comfier flight and don’t sit near the toilets or galleys – because it can be smelly and noisy,’ suggests Daisy White, a former flight attendant.
Advertisement
Sit at the front of the plane for your choice of food
If you can choose your seats, opt for the front of the plane. Not only do you tend to feel turbulence less at the front compared to the tail of the plane, but there’s also a perk during mealtimes.
Kamila Jakubjakova, a flight attendant, told Metro: ‘The food service usually starts from the front of the airplane, so you’ll get to dine first if you sit in the very first rows of an aircraft. Sitting in the front rows also means you’re more likely to get your preferred choice of meal if two options are available.’
However, the cut is less than previously promised.
At the November budget, Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves said: “I can tell you today that for every family we are keeping our promise to get energy bills down and cut the cost of living with £150 cut from the average household bill from April next year.”
Britain’s energy debts have been pushed to record levels, partially due to inflated gas market prices as gas by tanker is imported from the US and Middle East, and also because of the greater costs of the UK’s energy transition.
On the energy bill cut, Tim Jarvis, the director general of markets at Ofgem, said: “Today’s announcement will be welcome news for many households.
Advertisement
“Wholesale energy prices have fallen in recent months, and we’re investing in our network to safeguard the future energy system. The main driver of today’s reduction is the change to policy costs announced by the chancellor in the budget.”
Here’s everything you need to know about the reduction in energy bills:
What is Ofgem’s price cap?
The energy price cap sets a maximum price that suppliers can charge customers in England, Scotland and Wales for each unit of gas and electricity they use.
Advertisement
It also sets a maximum daily standing charge – the cost of having your home connected to the grid.
The headline price cap figure provided by Ofgem indicates what a household using gas and electricity and paying by direct debit can expect to pay if their energy consumption is typical.
However, the cap does not limit a home’s total bills because people still pay for the amount of energy they use, so if it’s above the average they will pay more, and if it is below they will pay less.
When will energy bills be reduced?
Advertisement
The reduction in energy bills will begin in April.
Ofgem’s quarterly cap will reduce by 7 percent a year for the three months from April, from £1,758 to £1,641 for the average combined gas and electricity bill in Great Britain.
All households will benefit from the savings no matter which tariff they are on, however, savings will differ depending on how much energy is used.
However, critics say the energy bill cut doesn’t go far enough. Clare Moriarty, the chief executive of Citizens Advice, said: “A fall in energy prices is welcome but for many people bills remain stubbornly high. For millions of households this has stopped being a temporary hardship and become an ongoing threat to their financial stability.
Advertisement
“The government has taken steps in the right direction to bring down bills. However, planned changes to how warm home discount costs are recovered mean those who need it most – households on low incomes with the highest energy needs – could keep as little as half the support in practice.”
All participants will get their hands on this medal
Belfast City Marathon medal 2026
With just under 10 weeks to go until the Phoenix Energy Belfast City Marathon and Team Relay, the Belfast City Marathon has revealed this year’s medal to build excitement ahead of the big day on May 3.
The event gets underway at Stormont Estate and travels through each corner of the city across the 26.2-mile route. Team Relay participants taking on Legs A, B, C or D can collect their medal at the end of their legs at Montgomery Road, Boucher Road, Falls Road and Duncairn Gardens. Marathon runners and Leg E relay participants will receive their medals at the finish line at Ormeau Park.
If you would like to make your medal even more memorable, you can add an iTAB. This small metal insert fits neatly onto the back of your medal and can be personalised with your name or team relay name, along with your finish time. Participants can pre-order an iTAB by visiting eventmaster.ie, logging into their account and heading to the ‘Manage My Booking’ section to add it to their order.
If you missed out on securing an entry this year, there are still opportunities to take part through our Charity Places. Visit www.belfastcitymarathon.com/charity-places to find out more.
The Phoenix Energy Belfast City Marathon is sponsored by Phoenix Energy, Translink, Kukri Sports, Belfast Live, Daily Mirror, Q Radio, Better, Runna, Marathon Photos Live, iTAB, Deep RiverRock, Charles Hurst, Mac in a Sac, Steigen, Applied Nutrition, Linwoods Health Foods and Belfast City Council. The Official Charity Platform is Give2You.
Want to see more of the stories you love from Belfast Live? Making us your preferred source on Googlemeans you’ll get more of our exclusives, top stories and must-read content straight away. To add Belfast Live as a preferred source, simply click here.
The opponent, date and venue for Taylor’s final fight have not been confirmed.
August would be a more likely date for a Croke Park bout as the iconic Dublin stadium is hosting the latter stages of the All-Ireland Hurling and Football Championships throughout July.
In September, Taylor was named ‘Champion in Recess’ by the World Boxing Council (WBC) after informing the sanctioning body of her plans to take some time away from the sport.
Last week, Briton Sandy Ryan claimed the vacant belt with victory over Mexico’s Karla Ramos Zamora in Nottingham.
Advertisement
Taylor has a 25-1 professional record with her only defeat coming against Britain’s Chantelle Cameron in Dublin in 2023.
After avenging that loss to become a two-weight undisputed champion later that year, Taylor recorded wins over Serrano in November 2024 and July 2025 having already overcome the Puerto Rican in April 2022.
“I’m not sure who the opponent is or what the date will be,” added Taylor, who won an Olympic lightweight gold medal in 2012 before turning pro in 2016.
“I just know I’ll fight this year during the summer time and all the other details will be laid out in the coming weeks and months.
Advertisement
“Either way I’m in the gym for whenever and whoever it will be. I’m staying sharp and ready.”
Mary Berry has shared a variety of dishes over the years, including this ‘wonderfully comforting’ chicken pasta bake which has more than 170 four-star ratings on BBC Food.
Sophie Harris Senior Lifestyle Reporter and Isobel Pankhurst Audience Writer
13:41, 25 Feb 2026
Mary Berry has revealed numerous recipes throughout the years, including speedy weeknight meals, which are ideal for the entire household. This includes her chicken pasta bake, which boasts over 170 four-star reviews on BBC Food.
It can be made in advance, and even stored in the freezer for as long as three months. The recipe description stated: “A wonderfully comforting chicken pasta bake, this will go down well with the family.”
Advertisement
It feeds six to eight individuals, and whilst Mary opts for penne pasta, she notes that any pasta variety will be suitable.
Ingredients:
Butter, for greasing
250g penne
One onion, roughly chopped
Three skinless, boneless chicken breasts, cut into thin strips
One tablespoon of paprika
Two tablespoons of olive oil
Salt and freshly ground black pepper
For the sauce:
50g butter
50g plain flour
750ml hot milk
One teaspoon of Dijon mustard
100g Parmesan cheese, coarsely grated
Two large tomatoes, deseeded and cut into small cubes
Method:
Preheat the oven to 220°C/200°C Fan, then butter a shallow 1.75 litre ovenproof dish.
Cook the penne with the onion in boiling, salted water, then drain and refresh in cold water. Leave to drain again in the colander.
Put the chicken strips in a resealable freezer bag with the paprika and a little salt and pepper, seal the bag and shake to coat. Warm one tablespoon of oil in a large frying pan and swiftly sear the chicken over a high heat for two minutes until just cooked through.
Advertisement
Using a slotted spoon, transfer the chicken to a plate and leave to one side.
To prepare the sauce, melt the butter in a large saucepan, then incorporate the flour and whisk until smooth to create a roux. Cook for one minute, then gradually pour in the hot milk, whisking over a high heat until the sauce is smooth and thickened, allowing it to boil for four minutes.
Fold in the mustard and half the cheese, seasoning with salt and pepper.
Add the pasta and onion to the pan with the sauce, stirring well to combine. Spoon half of this mixture into the dish, lay the chicken strips on top, then spoon the remaining pasta and sauce over the chicken.
Advertisement
Scatter the tomatoes across the top, then finish with the remaining cheese. Place in the oven and bake for 20 minutes until piping hot and golden brown on top.