John Lewis Partnership has abandoned its build-to-rent housing ambitions, retreating from a high-profile property diversification strategy as the group pivots back towards its core retail business.

The employee-owned retailer confirmed it would withdraw from the rental housing scheme first championed by its former chair, Sharon White, who had sought to reduce reliance on retail by generating 40 per cent of profits from non-retail ventures by 2030. That target was later scrapped.

The build-to-rent initiative, launched in partnership with Aberdeen, aimed to deliver around 1,000 rental homes across sites in Ealing and Bromley in London and Reading in Berkshire. Aberdeen had pledged to raise £500m from institutional investors to fund the developments.

However, John Lewis said that the funds were never secured due to shifting macroeconomic conditions.

“Our rental property ambition was based on a very different financial environment: one with more stable investment returns, lower borrowing costs and more affordable construction costs,” a spokesman said. “The current climate, higher interest rates, inflationary pressures and a more cautious property market, means the model no longer meets our investment criteria.”

The decision marks a significant strategic reset under Jason Tarry (pictured), the former Tesco executive who became chair in 2024. Tarry has sought to restore the partnership’s focus on retail performance after several years of financial strain and cancelled staff bonuses.

The group is now pursuing an £800m investment programme aimed at revitalising its department stores, alongside a £1bn investment in its Waitrose estate of 320 shops. Recent initiatives include a high-profile partnership to bring Topshop concessions into John Lewis stores as it seeks to win back younger customers.

The build-to-rent strategy had originally been positioned as a way to unlock value from surplus Waitrose land and car parks while creating a more stable, long-term income stream less exposed to retail volatility.

However, the proposals were controversial from the outset. Local communities and planning authorities raised concerns over building heights, density and the proportion of affordable housing. Although several schemes ultimately secured planning approval, in some cases after appeals and intervention by government inspectors, the projects required significant upfront investment.

While John Lewis has not disclosed how much has been spent to date, it is understood that several million pounds were invested in design, planning and legal costs before the scheme was halted.

The withdrawal underlines the pressure facing retailers that diversified into property during the era of low interest rates. Higher borrowing costs have eroded returns on residential development, while construction inflation has increased project risk.

For John Lewis, the move signals a return to fundamentals after what some critics inside and outside the partnership viewed as a distraction from its core business.

With the cost-of-living crisis squeezing consumer spending and competition intensifying across both fashion and grocery, the partnership is betting that renewed focus on shopkeeping, rather than landlord ambitions, offers a clearer path to restoring profitability and rebuilding confidence among its employee-owners.

Jamie Young

Jamie is Senior Reporter at Business Matters, bringing over a decade of experience in UK SME business reporting.
Jamie holds a degree in Business Administration and regularly participates in industry conferences and workshops.

When not reporting on the latest business developments, Jamie is passionate about mentoring up-and-coming journalists and entrepreneurs to inspire the next generation of business leaders.

NVIDIA Corp. faces one of its most anticipated quarterly reports on February 25, 2026, after market close, as investors scrutinize whether the AI chip leader can sustain explosive growth amid soaring expectations and a stock trading near $197 ahead of the release.

As of February 25, 2026, NVIDIA (NASDAQ: NVDA) shares traded around $196-$197 in pre-earnings activity, up modestly from the prior close of $192.85 on February 24. The stock has gained significantly in 2026, building on 2025’s massive rally driven by AI infrastructure demand. Market capitalization exceeds $4.7 trillion, making NVIDIA the world’s most valuable company by a wide margin.

The company is scheduled to release fiscal fourth-quarter 2026 results (ended January 25, 2026) after the bell, followed by a conference call at 5:00 p.m. ET. Wall Street consensus, compiled from Bloomberg, LSEG, and other sources, projects adjusted earnings per share of $1.53 and revenue of approximately $65.9 billion to $66.2 billion—a 68% year-over-year increase from $39.3 billion in the year-ago quarter. Data center revenue, the primary growth engine, is expected to reach $60.36 billion or higher, reflecting continued hyperscaler spending on AI accelerators.

Analysts anticipate another strong beat-and-raise quarter, marking potentially the 11th consecutive period of growth exceeding 55%. Gross margins are projected at around 75%, with adjusted operating income near $44.56 billion. The report arrives at a pivotal time for the broader market, where NVIDIA’s performance has become a proxy for the AI boom’s health. A solid beat could reinforce confidence in AI infrastructure plays, while any shortfall in guidance might spark volatility across tech stocks.

CEO Jensen Huang and CFO Colette Kress are expected to provide commentary on Blackwell GPU ramp-up, demand from major cloud providers (Microsoft, Google, Meta, Amazon), and the upcoming Rubin architecture. Blackwell orders have reportedly crossed $350 billion in some estimates, with hyperscaler capex projected to hit $600 billion for 2026—much of it flowing to NVIDIA chips. The company faces scrutiny on whether AI spending remains robust or shows signs of moderation.

NVIDIA’s third-quarter fiscal 2026 results (reported November 19, 2025) set a high bar: record revenue of $57.0 billion (up 62% year-over-year), data center revenue of $51.2 billion (up 66%), and strong guidance for Q4 at $65.0 billion plus or minus 2%. That outlook has held firm, with some analysts raising estimates slightly in recent weeks.

The earnings call will also address supply chain dynamics, competition from AMD and custom silicon efforts by hyperscalers, and any updates on energy-efficient designs for next-generation AI workloads. Options markets have priced in a potential 5-6% stock swing post-earnings, reflecting the high stakes for a company whose moves often influence the S&P 500 and Nasdaq.

Analyst sentiment remains bullish overall. Consensus price targets sit well above current levels, with many firms highlighting NVIDIA’s dominance in AI accelerators and long-term secular tailwinds. However, valuation concerns persist—trading at around 41 times forward earnings in some calculations—amid worries about potential AI spending slowdowns or execution risks on Blackwell ramp.

NVIDIA’s trajectory in 2026 hinges on proving the AI supercycle endures. With the GTC 2026 event approaching in March, where major announcements are expected, the February 25 report serves as a critical checkpoint. A beat-and-raise scenario could propel shares higher, reinforcing the narrative of sustained hyperscaler demand, while any cautious guidance might trigger a pullback in a market increasingly sensitive to AI-related developments.

As the closing bell approaches, all eyes remain on NVIDIA to deliver clarity on the pace of AI infrastructure buildout and its implications for the broader tech sector.

Aston Martin has confirmed it will cut 20% of its workforce after annual losses widened sharply, as the luxury carmaker battles weak global demand and the impact of US trade tariffs.

The Gaydon-based manufacturer said net losses jumped 52% last year to £493.2m, while operating losses reached £259.2m. The company employs about 3,000 people globally, meaning around 600 roles are expected to go, with the majority of cuts understood to affect UK operations.

Aston Martin said the restructuring programme would generate annual savings of approximately £40m, with most of those savings realised during 2026. It did not provide a detailed timetable for the redundancies but confirmed that roles across the business, including factory positions, would be affected.

The carmaker blamed “extremely disruptive” US tariffs introduced under Donald Trump, as well as subdued demand in China, the world’s largest automotive market. The company has already warned that tariffs have significantly affected sales in the US, one of its key territories.

In a statement, Aston Martin said: “Having undertaken at the start of 2025 a process to make organisational adjustments to ensure the business was appropriately resourced for its future plans, we had to take the difficult decision at the end of 2025 to implement further changes. This latest programme will ultimately see the departure of up to 20% of our valued workforce.”

The job cuts form part of a broader effort to stabilise the company’s finances after years of volatility. Alongside the workforce reduction, Aston Martin has trimmed its five-year capital expenditure plan to £1.7bn, down from £2bn, by delaying investment in electric vehicle development.

The move signals a shift in strategy as the company prioritises short-term cash preservation over accelerated electrification. It comes amid a wider slowdown in EV demand across the luxury segment and mounting pressure on automakers from rising borrowing costs and trade uncertainty.

Aston Martin said it expects further cash outflows in 2026 but forecast a “material improvement” in financial performance, supported by the launch of its Valhalla hybrid supercar. Around 500 deliveries of the £850,000 model are expected to contribute to improved margins.

The company is targeting gross margins in the high 30% range and adjusted earnings before interest and taxes close to break-even.

In a separate effort to bolster its balance sheet, Aston Martin last week agreed a £50m deal to sell perpetual branding rights to its Formula One team.

Despite the cost-cutting measures and asset disposals, the company faces continued scrutiny from investors over its long-running turnaround plan, as it attempts to rebuild profitability in a turbulent global market.

Paul Jones

Harvard alumni and former New York Times journalist. Editor of Business Matters for over 15 years, the UKs largest business magazine. I am also head of Capital Business Media’s automotive division working for clients such as Red Bull Racing, Honda, Aston Martin and Infiniti.