It might have been more than a decade since the last episode of Scrubs aired, but fans are as excited to watch the new reboot which got announced last year.
Advertisement
To make matters even better, UK viewers can binge every single episode ahead of its release on Disney Plus tomorrow..
Given it’s been 25 years since the first series aired, you’d be forgiven for forgetting how the series started and then developed.
Advertisement
Thankfully, viewers in the UK can watch the show that premiered on NBC in 2001 for free, after all nine series were added to the streamer ITVX.
Most of the iconic cast look set to return for the revival (Picture: ITV)
Fans spotted a clue which they think means the janitor isn’t coming back (Picture: Danny Feld/Disney General Entertainment Content via Getty Images)
Together, they start as medical interns at the hospital. Through the years we see them develop personally and professionally against a backdrop of hilarious plotlines and emotionally charged moments.
The ninth season still features the iconic cast, but the focus shifts to med school and its students in a move which wasn’t popular with the show’s following.
In a Reddit discussion titled ‘Why is season nine so hated?’, users posted their grievances.
Sal101 said: ‘Scrubs had a fantastic ending, better by far than every sitcom I’ve ever watched.
Advertisement
‘But they reversed so much character development and progression with the majority of the OG cast.’
Viewers like Kakashi168 admitted it would’ve been better if it was a spin-off. He said: ‘There’s not that big of a connection to the original show.’
The show ran from 2001 – 2010 (Picture: Paul Drinkwater/NBCU Photo Bank/NBCUniversal via Getty Images)
Elliot, J.D. and Turk all began as interns on the show (Picture: NBC/Getty Images)
Metfan722 defended it in part: ‘It’s definitely not as bad as people say but it’s not the Scrubs we had all known and loved for 8 seasons up to that point.’
Although the revival series will feature new talent, Scrubs veterans Aseem Batra and Tim Hobert will serve as showrunners and executive producers.
Top five American sitcoms to binge after Scrubs
If you’re searching for more comedy with a similar feel to Scrubs, we’ve got you covered with these five shows…
Advertisement
St. Denis Medical, BBC iPlayer
Shrinking, Apple TV
Community, NOW
Brooklyn 99, Netflix
Arrested Development, Netflix and Disney+
When is the new season of Scrubs out in the UK?
The highly anticipated new season of Scrubs will be available to watch for viewers in the UK with a Disney+ subscription from February 26.
It will air via ABC on February 25 in the US, before being added to the streamer the following day.
Chalke, who plays Dr Elliot Reid, told the Independent before the show’s release: ‘We were new and we were scared as interns and scared in this new element of medicine and insecure and unsure of what we were doing.
‘So to get to come back, we really have grown and really become great leaders and great teachers.’
Advertisement
Meanwhile, Braff, noted that the aim of the new reboot was ‘to ground it again and start back with the based-in-reality thing that we had in the first couple years of the show’.
Discussing the cast, Ted Lasso creator Lawrence also added: ‘They’re still 12 years old every time they’re together, but they’re also still both leading very big, responsible adult lives. It just felt like it was time to revisit the old gang.’
This article was originally published on February 13, 2026.
The revival of Scrubs will be available to watch from February 26 on Disney+.
Advertisement
Got a story?
If you’ve got a celebrity story, video or pictures get in touch with the Metro.co.uk entertainment team by emailing us celebtips@metro.co.uk, calling 020 3615 2145 or by visiting our Submit Stuff page – we’d love to hear from you.
You can use your current bills to calculate what your future bills will be
The cost of energy is set to fall from April after Ofgem announced its new energy price cap. The typical dual fuel household will now pay £1,641 a year for their energy from April 1, 2026. That’s down from £1,758 based on the cap set on January 1, 2026.
Advertisement
That’s the typical household, however. You can use your current bills to estimate how much your bills will change by using our interactive calculator.
The price cap sets the maximum you can be charged for unit rates and standing charges – so your bill can be higher or lower than the price cap figure.
The average unit rate for gas is falling from 5.93p per kilowatt hour (kWh) to 5.74p per kWh, while the standing charge is decreasing from 35.09p a day to 29.09p. The average unit rate for electricity is falling from 27.69p per kWh to 24.67p per kWh. The standing charge is rising from 54.75p a day to 57.21p a day.
Tim Jarvis, Director General, Markets, at Ofgem, said: “Today’s announcement will be welcome news for many households. Wholesale energy prices have fallen in recent months, and we’re investing in our network to safeguard the future energy system. The main driver of today’s reduction is the change to policy costs announced by the Chancellor in the budget.
Advertisement
“Our focus at Ofgem remains on bearing down on the costs within our control, and unlocking the investment needed to support the transition to a more stable energy system over the longer term.
“We’re also seeing encouraging signs of greater engagement and competition, with switching increasing by almost 20% year on year. More households are choosing time‑of‑use tariffs that offer cheaper off‑peak rates, and suppliers are offering a wider range of products, including deals with savings at evenings or weekends.
“The price cap protects households from overpaying for energy, but it’s a safety net. Last year, consumers on fixed deals paid around £115 less than the cap on average, so we’d encourage people to speak to their supplier about the options available and consider whether a different tariff or payment method could help bring their bills down further.”
At the 2026 Bafta awards, big wins for independent British film I Swear and American horror film Sinners were overshadowed by a regrettable moment. Activist John Davidson said the N-word – arguably the most offensive slur in the English language due to the centuries of violence and oppression it carries – while Sinners’ stars Michael B. Jordan and Delroy Lindo were presenting an award.
Davidson, on whom the film I Swear is based, has Tourette syndrome – including coprolalia which causes the involuntary use of obscene and socially inappropriate words and phrases.
Jordon and Lindo looked shaken and have since expressed their discomfort and disappointment with Baftas’ handling of the situation. In an apology letter to Bafta members, the academy said it was launching a “comprehensive review” into the incident.
Since the incident, Davidson has received extensive online abuse, including accusations that he is a racist – an accusation that fails to consider that this was an involuntary audible compulsion. Davidson has stressed there was no intention behind the word, stating he was “deeply mortified if anyone considers my involuntary tics to be intentional or to carry any meaning”.
Advertisement
Two things can be true at the same time. While this incident was involuntary, that does not lessen the hurt or offence that Jordan, Lindo and members of the viewing public felt. No one could have prevented Davidson’s involuntary compulsion in the moment.
However, it could have been edited out of the delayed broadcast. In fact, a second slur was removed, but this one was missed. Doing so would have spared viewers from hearing the slur and helped protect Davidson and others with Tourette’s from the abuse that followed. It also could have reduced the spread of misinformation about the condition, which directly undermines the mission of I Swear to teach empathy and kindness towards people with Tourette syndrome.
By broadcasting the Baftas on a two-hour delay in a condensed format, the BBC assumes greater editorial responsibility than with live transmission. It must therefore meet higher standards and be able to justify its editing choices. The BBC failed to do that in this instance, causing undue harm to both black and disabled people.
Advertisement
There are two main reasons why the Baftas are broadcast at a delay. The first is engagement. The award ceremony lasts three hours, so to help make it less tedious, the broadcast is edited down to two hours.
The second is political. The BBC’s editorial guidelines require them to prevent harm and offence to viewers. Award shows are considered high-risk because they are live and broadcasters cannot control what winners say.
This is often called “the tyranny of live”. As media and communications scholar Paddy Scannell wrote, in live broadcasting “if something goes wrong, the best you can do is damage limitation, for once the words are out of your mouth they are in the public domain and they cannot be unsaid”.
Yet, by broadcasting at a delay to mitigate “the tyranny of live”, broadcasters open up a new can of editorial worms – “the tyranny of the edit”.
Advertisement
In live broadcasting, when things go wrong, they can often be blamed on live conditions. While this does not necessarily reduce any harm caused, it can reduce culpability. Once a programme has been edited, this no longer applies, raising the editorial standards and making broadcasters accountable for every word spoken and removed.
In other words, broadcasters must be able to justify every editorial choice to their audience, especially when those choices cause harm or censor a political perspective.
Reaction and lessons for the BBC
The BBC has apologised for broadcasting the slur and re-edited the programme for BBC iPlayer. Producers overseeing the coverage told the Guardian that they did not hear the N-word from the broadcast truck due to a technical issue. That would hardly be a reassuring defence of their actions.
Davidson later said that he was assured by Bafta that any swearing would be edited out of the broadcast, and that he felt “a wave of shame” over the incident. He also questioned the decision to seat him so close to a microphone.
Advertisement
The BBC has also offered no explanation for the post-production removal of sections of My Father’s Shadow director Akinola Davies Jr’s acceptance speech, including a statement of solidarity with “the economic migrant, the conflict migrant, those under occupation, dictatorship, persecution and those experiencing genocide” and the remark “free Palestine”.
Labour MP Dawn Butler has written to the BBC seeking a full explanation for these decisions.
Beyond the immediate fallout, this episode carries wider lessons for the BBC about learning from past errors. Last summer, the BBC was found to have broken harm and offence standards after airing “death, death to the IDF” chants in Bob Vylan’s Glastonbury set. After this incident, they promised to review their protocols around the livestreaming of “high-risk” events. Yet a similar misjudgement happened again.
To maintain public trust and support, the BBC must be more responsive in explaining their editorial choices – and more forthcoming when they get things wrong.
Cuba claims its military fired on a US speedboat that entered territorial waters, killing four people and injuring six in a confrontation on Friday
Antonio Scancariello and Laura Hill
20:05, 25 Feb 2026Updated 20:06, 25 Feb 2026
Cuban military forces have shot at an American boat, resulting in four fatalities and six casualties, according to emerging reports.
Cuba’s Ministry of Interior (MININT) announced today (February 25) that a US speedboat bearing the Florida registration FL7726SH was spotted approximately one nautical mile northeast of the El Pino Channel, near Cayo Falcones in Corralillo Municipality, Villa Clara.
Advertisement
According to the Home Office’s official account, hostilities erupted when the “violating” craft opened fire on Cuban border personnel, wounding the commander, after Border Guard Troops moved in to identify the vessel.
The statement confirmed the “offending boat opened fire against the Cuban personnel, causing the commander of Cuban vessel to be injured. As a result of the confrontation, at the time of this report, on the foreign side, four aggressors were killed and six were injured, who were evacuated and received medical assistance”.
Cuba’s Home Office further declared: “Cuba reaffirms its commitment to protecting its territorial waters, based on the principle that national defence is a fundamental pillar for the Cuban State in order to protect its sovereignty and stability in the region. Investigations are continuing by the competent authorities to fully clarify the facts.”, reports the Express.
The exchange of gunfire occurs against a backdrop of escalating tensions between the United States and the communist nation, separated by merely 100 miles (160 kilometres) of the Florida Straits, AFP reported. This development follows Washington’s decision to ease the near-total oil embargo on the island, initially imposed by President Donald Trump in January following the U.S. removal of Cuba’s key ally, Nicolas Maduro of Venezuela.
Advertisement
The agency further reported that prior to Maduro’s apprehension by U.S. forces on January 3, Cuba had depended on Venezuela for approximately half its fuel requirements.
In response to concerns from Caribbean leaders, who feared that depriving Cuba of oil would rapidly lead to economic collapse, Washington announced it would permit shipments of Venezuelan oil for “commercial and humanitarian use,” according to AFP.
Daniel Dubois refused a fist bump from world champion Fabio Wardley as the pair came face-to-face at a lively news conference in London.
The world title fight between two of Britain’s biggest punchers takes place at Manchester’s Co-op Live Arena on 9 May.
After some long-winded bickering between the two camps, the fighters – relatively restrained until that point – finally sparked into life.
Wardley said he would “flatten” the challenger. “My power is proven. If there’s time left on the clock, I’m taking you out of the fight,” he added.
Advertisement
The 31-year-old – with 19 stoppages in 20 wins – will make the first defence of his WBO crown, having claimed the ‘interim’ title against Joseph Parker before being upgraded to full champion when Oleksandr Usyk vacated the belt.
Former IBF champion Dubois, 28, is coming off a devastating knockout loss to generational great Usyk last summer.
“If you look back, when it gets dicey, he’s not up for it,” Wardley said of Dubois, who has faced accusations of folding too easily in his three stoppage defeats.
Wednesday’s news conference took place at Dutch Hall, a converted 16th-century church tucked away in the heart of the city.
Advertisement
Dubois – never one for lengthy monologues – kept his answers short and matter of fact.
But the Londoner was clear in his intention. “Victory by knockout, by any means necessary,” he said.
When the fighters eventually stepped forward for the obligatory face-off, Dubois looked away first as Wardley smirked.
Moments later Wardley extended his fist in a gesture of respect, but Dubois shook his head and refused to engage.
The former glamour model visited an aesthetics clinic on Tuesday with her husband Lee Andrews, where she splashed the cash on course of beauty treatments
20:04, 25 Feb 2026Updated 20:05, 25 Feb 2026
Katie Price has showed off her new face after booking in for a series of tweakments in Dubai. The former glamour model visited an aesthetics clinic on Tuesday with her husband Lee Andrews, where she splashed the cash on course of beauty treatments.
On Wednesday evening she posed for a glamorous selfie in front of the Burj Al Arab, telling fans she had enjoyed a “gorgeous dinner with a gorgeous view”. Katie wore her hair up and showed off her tan in a white dress, accessorising with some gold jewellery.
Ensure our latest headlines always appear at the top of your Google Search by making us a Preferred Source. Click here to activate or add us as your Preferred Source in your Google search settings.
The newlyweds both underwent aesthetic tweakments, with the clinic claiming on Instagramthat they have set out a “treatment plan” for Katie “over time” – suggesting she isn’t planning on coming back from her honeymoon any time soon.
Advertisement
Sharing a snap with Katie and Lee on Instagram, aesthetic practitioner Max McNiel wrote: “It was lovely to see you today @katieprice. It was great to have you both in clinic today & was lovely to meet you both!
“Thank you for trusting me to carry out your treatments & I look forward to seeing you both again soon. A full treatment plan for Katie has been set out to achieve best results overtime.”
It’s not yet known what the Pricey has done to herself, however the clinic says it specialises in ‘lip contouring’.
The mum-of-five, 47, promised fans she would come back to Blighty last week with her new husband, Lee, 43, who hasn’t stepped foot in the country since their bombshell wedding in Dubai.
Advertisement
After the shock nuptials, the former glamour model returned home to the UK on her own just days later – as her new husband explained she needed to see her children .
She then flew back out to Dubai for their ‘honeymoon’ after the businessman claimed he would come to the UK several times. However, the couple have now been in Dubai for several weeks.
Advertisement
Last night, the Pricey admitted she’d put on half a stone in weight since meeting Lee, who she teased was a “feeder”. Taking to her Instagram Stories on Tuesday evening, Katie told fans: “I have a confession to make. He is a feeder. I’ve been to the doctors and everything, asked them why… everyone’s saying how I’ve lost weight.”
“I’ve got to sort you out, I’m sorry,” Lee replied. “I’ve actually put on half a stone,” Katie continued. “You’ll be pleased to know I’ve put on half a stone because I can’t stop eating. And you’re eating for one, that’s the truth,” Lee said, referencing recent speculation that Katie was pregnant. She has since confirmed she isn’t. “I’m just comfy,” Katie concluded as the couple enjoyed their meal in Dubai.
Firefighters were called to the property in Church Lane, Thornton le Dale, at 12.45pm on Wednesday (February 25).
North Yorkshire Fire and Rescue Service said the crew from Pickering pumped the water out of the property and helped a Yorkshire Water engineer to isolate the burst main.
A service spokesperson said: “Crews used main pump, hard suction and a delivery pump to get water out of the property as well as a salvage sheet and small tools to assist a Yorkshire water engineer isolate the water.
Advertisement
“Once the water had stopped progressing into the property, crews left the incident.”
On 23 February 1981, a group of officers led by Tejero burst into the main chamber of the national parliament, wielding guns and threatening the politicians as a new government was being sworn in. Their aim was to return authoritarianism – six years after the death of the country’s dictator Francisco Franco.
York Central MP Rachael Maskell said the “web” surrounding child sex offender Jeffrey Epstein and his associates “must be brought to book”.
Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, whose royal titles were removed in October 2025, was a known associate of Epstein’s and stepped down from his role as UK trade envoy – a position he held from 2001 – in July 2011.
It came after details of his friendship emerged following Epstein’s 18-month prison sentence for soliciting a minor for prostitution in 2008.
Recommended reading:
Advertisement
Mr Mountbatten-Windsor was arrested on suspicion of misconduct in public office on Thursday (February 19).
He has since been released under investigation and has previously denied any wrongdoing.
Rachael Maskell MP has called for more to be made clear surrounding Andrew’s appointment and time spent as trade envoy, along with the
‘Privilege must not be protected’
In a parliamentary debate held on Tuesday (February 24), Ms Maskell said “unaccountable power must not hide, privilege must not be protected”.
The debate was brought to the House of Commons by the Liberal Democrats, who demanded all papers relating to the creation of Andrew’s role as trade envoy, along with minutes and communications on the vetting of the former prince, be made public.
Advertisement
The motion also requested correspondence relating to advice from – or provided to – Peter Mandelson, another associate of Epstein’s who was also arrested on suspicion of misconduct in public office on Monday (February 23).
‘This is the latest blow, in this shameful chapter’
The House passed the motion on Tuesday (February 24) without division.
Trade Minister Chris Bryant confirmed that the government will release the files “as soon as is practicable and possible within the law”.
He indicated that any documents potentially relating to the offence of misconduct in public office may be withheld.
Advertisement
Tom Gordon MP has welcomed the passing of his party’s motion in Parliament (Image: Supplied)
MP for Harrogate and Knaresborough, Tom Gordon, said he “welcomed” this news, which he said would “shine a light on Andrew’s dealings”.
He added: “This is the latest blow, in this shameful chapter.
“We’ll continue to call for transparency and restore trust in our political institutions.”
But Ms Maskell has called for more to be done.
Advertisement
She called the Liberal Democrats’ motion “narrow in scope”, adding: “Clearly the police investigation must take its course, and I am sure it will be deep and thorough because it runs so far, but ultimately, if we are just looking at the appointment, we must also ask about that period of time when Mr Mountbatten-Windsor carried out the role and the implications to wider networks.”
The death in Poynton is not being treated as suspicious
19:28, 25 Feb 2026Updated 19:28, 25 Feb 2026
Police sealed off a pathway and area of woodland on Tuesday night (February 24) after a woman was tragically found dead. Officers and paramedics attended the incident off Woodside Lane in Poynton, Stockport.
Emergency crews were called to the scene shortly after 7pm to concerns for welfare reports regarding a woman. A woman, aged in her 60s, was found dead at the scene.
A number of incident response units and police cars were seen stationed along Woodside Lane following the incident, with a walkway and wooded area also cordoned off by police who were standing guard amid investigations.
The death is not currently being treated as suspicious, Cheshire Constabulary said. A file is being prepared for the coroner.
A spokesperson for Cheshire Constabulary said: “At 7.05pm on Tuesday 24 February, police were called by paramedics to concerns for the welfare of a woman on Woodside, Poynton.
“Officers attended and sadly a woman in her sixties was declared dead at the scene. The death is not being treated as suspicious, and a case file will be prepared for the coroner.”