Connect with us

Sports

50 Stats That Explain the First Three Rounds of the 2026 Six Nations

Published

on

Three rounds into the 2026 Six Nations and the numbers are already shaping the storylines: France look the most clinical, Scotland the most efficient, England are living off territory, Ireland are still chasing precision, while Wales and Italy have quietly put up some fascinating underlying metrics.

Below are 50 stats from the opening three rounds that show what’s working, what’s wobbling, and what might decide the championship run-in.

France: the benchmark (and the risk)

  1. Total metres gained: France lead the tournament with 1,972m.
  2. First-phase tries: France have scored 9, the most in the championship.
  3. 22m efficiency: France convert 40.9% of 22m entries into tries.
  4. Chip kicks: France lead with 11.
  5. Box kicks: France have used 40, second only to Wales.
  6. 50/22 success: France are one of only two teams with a successful 50/22.
  7. Lineout errors: France have a perfect record with 0.
  8. Maul-to-try: France are one of only two teams to convert a maul into a try.
  9. Early momentum: France have scored 3 tries inside the opening 10 minutes.
  10. Turnovers conceded: France have conceded a tournament-high 59.

France look the most dangerous side in the competition — but that turnover count is the one number that can keep others in touching distance.

Ireland: pressure without polish

  1. Scrum offences: Ireland have conceded the most with 12.
  2. Lineout errors: Ireland lead the tournament with 3.
  3. Tackle success: Ireland sit at 75.00%.
  4. Turnovers conceded: Ireland have conceded 43.
  5. Rucks won in opposition 22: Ireland have recorded 30.
  6. 50/22 success: Ireland are one of the two teams to execute one successfully.
  7. Restart retention: Ireland have retained 1 restart kick.
  8. Early momentum: Ireland have scored 2 tries inside the opening 10 minutes.

The underlying pressure is there for Ireland, but set-piece errors and scrum discipline are leaving points on the pitch.

Scotland: efficiency, accuracy, composure

  1. Tackle success: Scotland lead the tournament at 85.22%.
  2. Turnovers conceded: Scotland have conceded 32.
  3. Maul-to-try: Scotland are one of only two teams to convert a maul into a try.
  4. Restart retention: Scotland lead with 2 retained restart kicks.
  5. Chip kicks: Scotland have attempted 5.
  6. Rucks won in opposition 22: Scotland have recorded 12.
  7. Early momentum: Scotland have scored 2 tries inside the opening 10 minutes.

Scotland aren’t topping every “power” category, but their efficiency stats are screaming “hard to beat”.

England: territory kings, ball security worries

  1. Territorial kicking metres: England lead with 2,893m kicked.
  2. Box kicks: England have used 26.
  3. Tackle success: England sit at 79.06%.
  4. Turnovers conceded: England have conceded 56.
  5. Chip kicks: England have attempted 6.
  6. Rucks won in opposition 22: England have recorded 14.
  7. Early momentum: England have scored 2 tries inside the opening 10 minutes.

England are controlling where games are played — but that turnover figure is the red flag.

Wales: high work-rate, strong retention, blunt edge

  1. Box kicks: Wales lead the tournament with 43.
  2. Turnovers conceded: Wales are the best in the championship with just 26.
  3. Rucks won in opposition 22: Wales lead with 33.
  4. Tackle success: Wales sit at 76.37%.
  5. Turnover profile: Wales have conceded 33 fewer turnovers than France (26 vs 59).
  6. Territory approach: Wales are the most committed to contestable-kick pressure (box-kick volume No.1).
  7. Red-zone presence: Wales have spent plenty of time in the 22 (rucks won No.1) but haven’t matched France’s conversion rate.
  8. Ball security: Wales’ retention is better than every other nation after three rounds.

Wales’ numbers suggest a side that can build pressure and keep the ball — the missing piece is turning that work into tries.

Italy: competitive in spells, still chasing cutting edge

  1. 22m efficiency: Italy convert just 16.7% of 22m entries into tries.
  2. Tackle success: Italy sit at 78.86%.
  3. Turnovers conceded: Italy have conceded 52.
  4. Chip kicks: Italy have attempted 3 (lowest in the tournament table shown).
  5. Rucks won in opposition 22: Italy have recorded 13.
  6. Early momentum: Italy have scored 1 try inside the opening 10 minutes.

Italy’s defence is not miles off, but their 22m conversion number explains why strong periods aren’t becoming scoreboard pressure.

Set-piece & discipline: the hidden swing factors

  1. Scrum discipline: Ireland have conceded the most scrum offences (12), while England and Wales are the most disciplined (5 each).
  2. Maul strategy: England have attempted the most mauls (24), but only France and Scotland have converted a maul into a try.
  3. Lineout accuracy: Ireland lead lineout offences (3), while France have made 0 lineout errors.
  4. Defensive danger-zone penalties: Wales have conceded the most in defence (23), closely followed by England (22).

What the numbers really mean after three rounds

France have the most clinical attack, Scotland have the cleanest efficiency profile, England are living off territory, and Ireland’s underlying pressure is being undermined by set-piece and discipline issues.

But don’t ignore Wales and Italy. Wales are leading the tournament for red-zone rucks and ball retention — those are foundations you can build on quickly if the attack clicks. Italy’s conversion rate tells you exactly why they’re not turning competitiveness into wins.

Two rounds remain. If one side improves a single lever — France reducing turnovers, Ireland cleaning up scrum/lineout, or Wales sharpening 22m conversion — the table can still shift fast.

Advertisement


LiveScores Now Available at IrishScores.com

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sports

Vikings Chat with Defender at Scouting Combine

Published

on

Advertisement

Aug 31, 2024; Atlanta, Georgia, USA; Clemson Tigers defensive lineman DeMonte Capehart (19) reacts after tackling Georgia Bulldogs running back Branson Robinson (not pictured) during the first quarter of the 2024 Aflac Kickoff Game at Mercedes-Benz Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Ken Ruinard-USA TODAY Sports

The Minnesota Vikings continued their pre-draft evaluations at the Scouting Combine, reportedly meeting with a defensive prospect who fits a clear roster need in the trenches.

The decision-makers met with Clemson defensive tackle Demonte Capehart, the player announced at the Combine. He’s scheduled to fly off the board on Day 3 of the NFL Draft in a couple of months.

Capehart spent six years at Clemson and appeared in 57 games with the ACC program. In those appearances, he logged 72 tackles, 13.5 tackles for loss and 3 sacks. He can provide strength and power in the middle of the defensive front.

Advertisement

In a recent report, Draft Huddle summarized his skill set, “DeMonte Capehart is a large, experienced interior defensive tackle with strong anchor ability, rotational experience, and a power-driven play style developed within Clemson’s defensive line system. He wins with size, strength, and gap discipline rather than elite explosiveness or pass-rush production. While his limited statistical output and pass-rush ceiling cap his overall upside, his durability, frame, and interior toughness provide a reliable floor as a rotational NFL defensive tackle in a multi-front defensive scheme.”

demonte capehart
Clemson defensive linemen, top to bottom, Cade Denhoff (44), Vic Burley (45) DeMonte Capehart (19), and defensive end Jahiem Lawson (15) play Troy during the first quarter at Memorial Stadium in Clemson, S.C. Saturday, September 6, 2025.

According to PFF, Capehart produced an elite run-stopping rate of 8.6%. His play in the ground game is undoubtedly his best attribute.

And that’s where the Vikings enter the conversation. The defense led by defensive magician Brian Flores lacks some oomph in that area.

Last season, Flores coordinated one of the league’s elite units, but the ground game left some room for improvement. The Vikings ranked 9th in run DVOA and 14th in rush EPA. Sure, that’s not bad by any means, but it didn’t quite match the success against the pass.

Advertisement

There were also a couple of alarming games in which opponents ran over them with little resistance. Contests against the Los Angeles Chargers, Pittsburgh Steelers, and Green Bay Packers come to mind when backup-caliber runners (Kimani Vidal, Kenneth Gainwell, and Emmanuel Wilson) were unstoppable.

Minnesota’s defensive line room still includes the two expensive veterans the franchise added a year ago. There’s a decent chance that one of Javon Hargrave and Jonathan Allen won’t be on the team when the Draft kicks off, however. Too enticing are the potential salary-cap savings for a team in the red.

Vikings defenders agains the new York Giants in 2025
Dec 21, 2025; East Rutherford, New Jersey, USA; Minnesota Vikings defensive lineman Jalen Redmond (61) reacts with linebacker Eric Wilson (55) during the first half at MetLife Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Vincent Carchietta-Imagn Images

Scheduled to become an exclusive rights free agent, Jalen Redmond is widely expected to return for another year after his breakout campaign. Behind that top trio, the Vikings employ 2024 and 2025 draftees Levi Drake Rodriguez and Tyrion Ingram-Dawkins, who have played rotational roles.

Pre-draft meetings at the Combine do not automatically signal strong draft interest, but they are a key part of a team’s evaluation process. Franchises typically use these conversations to gauge football IQ, personality, and scheme fit as much as on-field production. For a veteran college player like Capehart, who has extensive experience in a high-level defensive system at Clemson, those interviews can be especially important.

The Vikings, in particular, have shown a willingness in recent drafts to target interior defenders on Day 3 who can contribute early while developing into more consistent contributors over time.

Advertisement

Adding another Day 3 pick could complete the room, especially if that guy can perform against the run. Capehart fits that profile and could be on Minnesota’s list of intriguing players. He is expected to perform well at the Combine to boost his stock.

Editor’s Note: Information from PFFOver The Cap, and Sports Reference helped with this article.

avatar
Janik Eckardt is a German sports nerd, who likes numbers and stats. He chose the Vikings to be his … More about Janik Eckardt

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Sports

IS SHE IN HERE RIGHT NOW?”- Nick Fuentes reacts to Candace Owens claiming she can “astral project

Published

on

Nick Fuentes reacted publicly on X after Candace Owens claimed Charlie Kirk had a “third eye” and said they had discussed astral projection.

Owens made the remarks during a livestream on February 5, 2026, titled An Open Letter to Erika Kirk. In the broadcast, she discussed conversations she said she had with Kirk about supernatural experiences, including what she described as his “third eye,” sleep paralysis, and astral projection.

After clips from the livestream circulated online, Fuentes responded later that month. On February 25, 2026, the fan-run X account Fuentes Updates posted a summary of his reaction. The post stated:

“Once Candace Owens said she can astral project, Nick started getting freaked out 😳 ‘IS SHE IN HERE RIGHT NOW???’”

The quoted remark was presented as Fuentes’ immediate response to Owens’ claim that she could astral project. No additional written explanation was included in the post cited. His reaction focused specifically on her assertion about astral projection rather than the broader set of claims discussed in the livestream.

Candace Owen’s YouTube podcast served as the backdrop to the exchange. During that episode, she described past discussions with Charlie Kirk that she said involved paranormal and metaphysical topics.

Those comments drew attention on social media in the weeks that followed, including the February 25, 2026, post referencing Fuentes’ reaction.

Advertisement

Candace Owens’ claims about a “third eye” and astral projection

In the February 5, 2026, livestream titled An Open Letter to Erika Kirk, Owens detailed conversations she said she had with Kirk regarding what she described as unusual childhood experiences and metaphysical subjects.

She stated:

“Charlie and I spoke a lot about his third eye. That’s why that sentence caught my attention in the article. He spoke about the street lamps that would go off when he would run, about the special school that he had to go to.”

Candace Owens added that they discussed the testing they both underwent during childhood. Owens further said:

“We spoke about the fact that we could both astral project. You know all of this, of course, you have his phone.”

She also referenced sleep paralysis and similar experiences, stating:

Advertisement

“When we learned that not everybody does that naturally. Sleep paralysis, you name it. We had conversations about it.”

Third eye must mean something totally different

In addition to her livestream statements, Candace Owens had previously made similar remarks in an earlier podcast episode published on October 8, 2025. In that episode, she described what she called a vivid dream involving Kirk, stating that he appeared to her and told her he had been betrayed. She said:

“I had a vivid dream this weekend and Charlie came to me and he told me that he was betrayed.”

Candace Ownes further added:

“You don’t have to believe that, but I do believe that… I also felt in the dream that it is soon going to be revealed… that there is nothing and no one that is going to stop the truth from coming out and it is going to have international consequences.”

She concluded that statement by adding:

Advertisement

“Take that to the bank. Quote me on that. Women tend to have a stronger intuition about people, I would say.”

Charlie Kirk’s passing on September 10, 2025, marked a widely noted moment within conservative political media. Since then, public discussion surrounding his life and work has continued, with Candace Owens’ recent claims and the reaction that followed becoming part of that broader conversation.


Stay tuned for more updates.