​The MPs for Scarborough and Whitby and Thirsk and Malton, as well as councillors, have reacted to the findings of investigators that the blaze, which burned for more than 40 days, was likely started by someone using a campfire or gas burner.

​At its height, the fire covered 10 sq miles (26 sq km) of moorland, reaching close to RAF Fylingdales in the North York Moors National Park, and was declared a major incident.

​Whitby MP Alison Hume and Malton’s Kevin Hollinrake called for a rethink of wild camping rules and said that there “should be consequences”.

The leader of North Yorkshire Council has said the authority will continue to support those affected, while a Green Party councillor said efforst should be focused on fighting climate change which was “the real cause of the moor fires”.

​Ms Hume said: “No one should be wild camping in our precious national park.

​“It’s clear the status quo, that discreet wild camping is ok as long as campers ‘leave no trace’, has failed with catastrophic consequences.

​“We were so fortunate that, thanks to the heroic efforts of fire crews and the farmers, no lives were lost.”

​The Labour MP told the Local Democracy Reporting Service (LDRS): “I hope Forestry England, the North York Moors Authority and landowners will be putting up dozens of new signs now warning people not to light fires or disposable barbecues.”

​It was only on 23 September that North Yorkshire Fire Service confirmed it was no longer being treated as a major incident.

​Part of the affected area had been used as a tank training ground during World War Two, and there were more than 18 explosions as the fire burned.

​Conservative party chairman and Thirsk and Malton MP Mr Hollinrake said: “The confirmation that this devastating wildfire is believed to have been caused by someone cooking over a naked flame is frankly infuriating.

​“This was entirely avoidable. The fire caused serious environmental damage, put livelihoods at risk and imposed significant economic costs on the local community.

​“That makes it even more angering given the extraordinary efforts of local volunteers, farmers and emergency services who worked around the clock to limit the destruction.”

​Speaking to the LDRS, he said that “where reckless behaviour is suspected, there must be consequences. Rural communities should not be left to pick up the bill for acts of carelessness.”

​He said: “I pay tribute once again to North Yorkshire Fire and Rescue Service, alongside the farmers, gamekeepers and residents who stepped forward without hesitation to protect homes, land, and wildlife.

​Commenting on the findings of the “in-depth” 150-hour investigation, chief fire officer Jonathan Dyson said: “The Fylingdales Moor fire was one of the most complex multi-agency incidents the Service has ever attended. I would like to once again thank local communities, farmers, gamekeepers and our colleagues from other fire and rescue services for the vital support they gave us.

“The fact that this fire is believed to have been started by cooking using a naked flame, such as a campfire or gas burner, is a stark reminder of how quickly wildfires can take hold, particularly in hot, dry and windy conditions.”

Responding to the publication of the cause of the worst wildfire in North Yorkshire’s history, North Yorkshire Council’s leader, Cllr Carl Les, said: “The result of the very detailed fire investigation states that the cause of this major incident is believed to be cooking using a naked flame, such as a campfire or gas burner.

“This milestone moment may trigger reflection and memories which may be difficult for the communities and businesses most impacted by what was without doubt a terrifying blaze.”

However,  the Green Party’s Cllr Andy Brown, who represents Aire Valley, said: ”The real cause of the moor fires that inflicted so much damage to local people and the local environment was not some unidentified possible camp fire as the Leader of North Yorkshire Council has stated.

“It was an exceptional period of dry weather leaving moors so tinder dry that the very ground caught fire.

“That was the product of climate change and serious action is going to be needed to rewet more of our uplands if we are going to limit the damage fossil fuel companies and oil states are doing to our community and our landscape.”

​

Earlier today (Thursday), North Yorkshire Fire and Rescue Service revealed the conclusions of an in-depth fire investigation into the fire on Flyingdales Moor last summer.

Following extensive enquiries, including the taking of witness statements, the review of footage and videos, detailed inspection of the site and analysis of fire patterns, the cause of the fire is believed to be cooking using a naked flame, such as a campfire or gas burner.

The fire was declared a major incident on August 13 due to its proximity to RAF Flyingdales, described as a Critical National Infrastructure. At its peak on 25 August, it covered an area of up to 25km².

A spokesperson for North Yorkshire Police said: “The findings of the Langdale Moor fire investigation are being thoroughly reviewed by North Yorkshire Police. We will issue an update in due course.

“Our thoughts remain with all those affected by this devastating blaze. We also praise the firefighters, volunteers, and members of the community who worked tirelessly to bring it under control.”

WASHINGTON (AP) — A federal judge on Thursday rejected a preservationist group’s request to block the Trump administration from continuing construction of a $400 million ballroom where it demolished the East Wing of the White House.

U.S. District Judge Richard Leon ruled that the National Trust for Historic Preservation was unlikely to succeed on the merits of its bid to temporarily halt President Donald Trump’s project. He said the privately funded group based its challenge on a “ragtag group of theories” under the Administrative Procedure Act and the Constitution, and would have a better chance of success if it amended the lawsuit.

“Unfortunately, because both sides initially focused on the President’s constitutional authority to destruct and construct the East Wing of the White House, Plaintiff didn’t bring the necessary cause of action to test the statutory authority the President claims is the basis to do this construction project without the blessing of Congress and with private funds,” the judge wrote.

The preservationists sought an order pausing the ballroom project until it undergoes multiple independent reviews and wins approval from Congress.

Trump used his social media account to hail the ruling as “Great news for America.” The Republican president said the project was ahead of schedule and under budget and “will stand long into the future as a symbol to the Greatness of America.”

The preservationists did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The White House announced the ballroom project over the summer. By late October, the Republican president had demolished the East Wing to make way for a ballroom that he said will fit 999 people. The White House said private donations, including from Trump himself, would pay for the planned construction of a 90,000-square-foot (8,400-square-meter) ballroom.

Trump proceeded with the project before seeking input from a pair of federal review panels, the National Capital Planning Commission and the Commission of Fine Arts. Trump has stocked both commission with allies.

The arts panel approved the project at a meeting last week. The planning commission is set to discuss it further at a March 5 meeting.

During a preliminary hearing in December, Leon warned the administration to refrain from making decisions on underground work, such as the routing of plumbing and gas lines, that would dictate the scope of future ballroom construction above ground.

The group challenging the project argued that Trump could be emboldened to go further — and possibly demolish the White House’s West Wing or Executive Mansion — if the court did not intervene.

“The losers will be (the) American public, who will be left with a massive ballroom that not only overwhelms what is perhaps the nation’s most historically important building, but will have been built in violation of an astonishingly wide range of laws,” plaintiffs’ attorneys wrote.

The administration said in a court filing that above-ground construction on the ballroom would not begin until April. In the meantime, government lawyers argued, the preservationist group’s challenge was premature because the building plans were not final.

The administration also argued that other presidents did not need congressional approval for previous White House renovation projects, large and small.

“Many of those projects were highly controversial in their time yet have since become accepted—even beloved—parts of the White House,” government lawyers wrote.

Leon, who was nominated to the bench by Republican President George W. Bush, said the White House office behind the project is not an agency covered under the jurisdiction of the Administrative Procedure Act. The judge also said the preservationists, who argued that the ballroom usurped the authority of Congress, did not have the basis to invoke the power of the courts.

As a result, “I cannot reach the merits of the National Trust’s novel and weighty statutory arguments” at this time, Leon said.

___

Associated Press writer Will Weissert contributed to this report.

Leading criminal defence lawyer Marcus Johnstone, managing director of PCD Solicitors who specialises in representing those accused of sexual offences, said: “I am not remotely surprised that Ian Huntley has been attacked in prison, four months since Ian Watkins was murdered by a fellow prisoner at HMP Wakefield.

David Vasey vowed to refund the former owners of the Teesdale Mercury after admitting a single charge of fraud at a plea hearing at Durham Crown Court on Wednesday (February 25).

The 63-year-old defendant committed the offence between June 2012 and September 2016 when he was initially financial manager and then financial director of the Barnard Castle-based weekly.

Vasey, said to be living in Normandy, France, appeared before the court last week, facing several counts of fraud by abuse of position.

Defendant David Vasey will be sentenced at Durham Crown Court in April for defrauding the Teesdale Mercury of £75,000 (Image: The Northern Echo)

His counsel, Chris Knox, said both he and his prosecution counterpart, Martin Towers, hoped to satisfactorily resolve the case prior to a provisional sentencing hearing, then set for March 19.

On the defendant’s return to court, on Wednesday, Mr Knox asked if the charges could be put to the defendant.

Vasey denied six counts of fraud but pleaded guilty to a seventh charge alleging that he made unauthorised payments to himself, of funds belonging to the Teesdale Mercury, between 20212 and 2016.

Mr Knox told the court: “We have been endeavouring to resolve this through discussion.

“He accepts fraudulently taking funds while working for the company and will pay £75,000 by the sentencing hearing.

“We have taken a long time to get to it and the complainant had to be consulted.

“What we are now anxious to do is that there should be acknowledged repayment before he is sentenced.”

Mr Knox also asked if a Probation Service background report could be prepared on the defendant in time for the sentencing hearing.

Judge Jo Kidd asked if the defendant had a fixed address in this country where he could live as a condition of his bail.

The court was given an address in Daisy Fields, Longframlington, Northumberland.

Read next … more court stories from The Northern Echo by clicking here

“Paying back what you stole would assist.”

He was bailed to return to the court for the new date for the sentencing hearing which was re-fixed for Thursday April 23.

A prosecuting lawyer told the court there were no booster seats, no child seats and some were “sharing seat belts.”

A man who had four unrestrained children in the back seat when he was doing over 100 mph on the motorway was handed a three-year driving ban today.

Ballymena Magistrates Court heard that on 27 May last year, police on the Rathbeg roundabout on the M2 spotted a vehicle travelling at 106 mph, 36 over the limit.

When the car was pulled over and officers spoke to 31-year-old Martin Christopher Stokes, they found a total of seven people in the car, including four children in the back seat, none of whom were properly restrained.

A prosecuting lawyer told the court there were no booster seats, no child seats and some were “sharing seat belts.”

“So there were seven people in a car, four of which were children not properly restrained, and he was doing 106 mph,” District Judge Nigel Broderick queried and the lawyer confirmed that was the case.

Stokes, with an address at Harmin Drive in Newtownabbey, entered guilty pleas to each of the five offences, including using a vehicle in a condition causing danger to passengers, excess speed, and three of carrying a child under 12 without proper restraint.

Defence counsel Grant Powles said while it was no excuse, Stokes had received news of a relative who was “very ill” in hospital, so he was on his way there.

Stokes himself was not present in court but Mr Powles conceded that he has previous driving convictions and that having been convicted of driving while unfit, he is subject to a three-year driving ban until 2028.

The barrister further conceded there were aggravating features in the case, but the judge told him “that is an understatement.”

In addition to the three-year driving ban, Judge Broderick imposed fines totalling £500.

Want to see more of the stories you love from Belfast Live? Making us your preferred source on Google means you’ll get more of our exclusives, top stories and must-read content straight away. To add Belfast Live as a preferred source, simply click here.

North in Seaburn, Sunderland, opened in December 2022 in a converted storage shelter at the far end of the promenade, and has since earned national recognition for its food.

The restaurant is now looking for a new owner, though the team has assured customers it will remain open until a suitable new owner has been chosen to takeover.

The restaurant is known for its small plates, brunches and seafood. (Image: North, Seaburn)

The team behind North, also responsible for Mexico 70, Koji, Ship Isis and The Kings Arms in Deptford, said: “We have decided to look for a new owner for North restaurant.

“Most importantly, in the meantime, we are not closing and are in no rush to.

“It’s business as usual and we will remain open until a suitable new owner has been chosen to takeover.”

This Sunday (March 1) will see the return of Sunday lunch with the arrival of a new oven. (Image: North, Seaburn)

North is one of just two restaurants in Sunderland included in the Good Food Guide, alongside Ember in Sheepfolds Stables, and has also been named among the guide’s top 100 local restaurants.

The restaurant is known for its small plates, brunches and seafood, all served with a view.

The team said: “We’ve had a fantastic three years in Seaburn and are so, so proud of the team’s achievements.

“Firstly, being listed in The Good Food Guide but then secondly discovering a month later that we’d also been chosen as the only Sunderland restaurant to have ever made The Good Food Guide’s Top 100 local restaurants was a real honour.”

They added that this Sunday (March 1) will see the return of Sunday lunch with the arrival of a new oven, and that brunch and evening menus will continue as usual.

The team also reassured customers with outstanding gift vouchers that they remain valid, and offered refunds should the restaurant change hands before vouchers are redeemed.

They said: “If you’ve enjoyed dining with us over the past three years it’d be great to see you again before we go, if you’ve not dined with us before, now is your chance.”

Many travellers who are British citizens and nationals of another country have been thrown into confusion and anxiety over complex new rules for travel to the UK.

Passengers can no longer use their foreign passport with an electronic travel authorisation (ETA) for visits to the UK.

The Home Office says British people who are citizens of a second country must travel to the UK using either a valid British or Irish passport, or a valid passport from any other country that has a “certificate of entitlement” – a digital verification that the holder has the right of abode in the UK.

But many people who are British citizens by birth or descent are concerned that imminent trips may be impossible. Obtaining either official document will take weeks. A passport will cost £94.50 and the certificate of entitlement £589.

At the 11th hour, the Home Office said that airlines could accept, at their discretion, an expired British passport issued at any time since 1989 along with a valid foreign passport.

Crucially, the biographic details – full name, date and place of birth – must match exactly. This will prove a problem for someone whose name has changed since the now-expired UK passport was issued.

Having the expired British-plus-valid foreign passport combination does not guarantee the holder will be allowed to travel

The Home Office stresses: “It is an operational decision whether carriers accept alternative proof, and if so, what alternative proof they will accept.”

In other words, airlines have the discretion to decide whether or not to allow the two-passport combination.

The Independent has been seeking urgent confirmation from leading carriers as to whether they will accept the combo if it meets the requirements: an expired document issued no earlier than 1989, and matching the biographical data on the valid passport.

These airlines have confirmed that they will allow travel:

Qantas is reported in the Australian media to be accepting expired UK passports. Air New Zealand is reportedly not accepting the current/expired passport combo. But since the carrier no longer flies to the UK, partner airlines may accommodate travellers.

Singapore Airlines has responded, enigmatically, by indicating the decision rests with the British authorities. A spokesperson said: “The UK Home Office may accept proof of citizenship if customers have an expired British passport issued 1989 or later and a valid non-visa-national third-country passport, with their personal particulars matching (eg full name, date of birth).”

Passengers flying with other carriers can check directly with the airline. In turn, ground staff can contact the Home Office Carrier Support Hub (CSH).

A Wizz Air spokesperson said: “As directed by the Home Office, we will consider each passenger on a case-by-case basis and if needed would contact Carrier Support Hub to establish the passengers’ circumstances and which combination of documents they are presenting.”

The Independent is waiting to hear from other airlines, but the evidence so far is that a large majority will accept the expired passport.

The government says the new rules constitute “a more streamlined, digital immigration system” that it claims “will be quicker and more secure for the millions of people who pass through the UK border each year”.

Read more: Aer Lingus demands passports from passengers between Ireland and Great Britain

The report doesn’t break down the loss into its component parts, but there are clues.

Uefa’s figures show Chelsea’s overall revenue was significantly lower than some of their Premier League rivals.

The Blues brought in £511m, compared to £746m for Manchester City and £744m for Liverpool.

That difference comes from a few key areas.

Chelsea’s income from ticket sales was the ninth-highest in Europe but still £28m less than Liverpool, one place ahead of them.

The average amount Chelsea made per matchday was £1.2m less than Liverpool, who again were one spot ahead.

Chelsea’s matchday revenue is restricted by the capacity of Stamford Bridge, which at 41,798 is only the 11th-biggest ground in the Premier League, 34,000 smaller than Manchester United’s Old Trafford.

The Blues also made far less in commercial revenue than some of their rivals.

They were ranked 11th for commercial revenue in Europe last year, making £207m – £5m down on the previous year.

That puts their commercial revenue £66m lower than Tottenham – the next-highest English club – and £165m lower than Manchester City, who brought in more than anyone else in the Premier League.

Chelsea also made far less from merchandising and kit sales than the five other wealthiest Premier League clubs.

They generated £83m from that revenue stream – no improvement on the previous year. That is £46m less than Spurs and £82m less than top-ranked Manchester United.

The only area in which Chelsea performed impressively in comparison to their rivals was broadcast revenue, with participation and victory in the Fifa Club World Cup boosting income to £192m, putting them second-highest on the list in Europe, behind Manchester City.

There are other actors, such as Lewis Pullman as Lee’s ever-faithful brother William, but this is Seyfried’s show. With her huge doe eyes, she’s perfect for Lee’s enraptured, possessed fervour. With her body swirling and contorting, it’s a ferociously physical performance.