Connect with us

Technology

Nodal connects hopeful parents with surrogates as reproductive freedom hangs in limbo

Published

on

Nodal, Close up of baby's feet, used in post about Hannah Life Technologies

Many people who want to have children can’t, or shouldn’t, carry a pregnancy for a variety of reasons. Gestational surrogacy can be a great option for those individuals — if they can endure the lengthy wait times and afford to pay for the costly service. New York-based Nodal looks to make the process less expensive, more transparent, and faster.

Nodal is a marketplace for prospective parents to get matched with vetted surrogates. Nodal founder and CEO Dr. Brian Levine told TechCrunch that his company wants to fix the industry’s supply-and-demand problems.

Dr. Brian Levine is the founder and CEO of Nodal. Image Credits:Nodal

Nodal takes the same technology-driven approach as life insurance companies to vet potential surrogates, Levine said, which speeds up the process and allows for more surrogates to be available. The marketplace approach also provides transparency for parents to have more control over which surrogate they work with. Nodal also cuts out middleman costs and works with fertility benefit companies like Carrot, Maven, and Progyny to lower the costs for prospective parents.

Levine said Nodal is designed to help lower costs, even for people who are paying out of pocket. Users pay a $500 monthly fee until they find a match. Facilitating the match is $15,000, and those monthly payments chip away at that total. If users want Nodal to serve as a case manager, those services start at an additional $10,000. While still expensive, Levine said prior to launching Nodal, his patients were spending up to $180,000 for all of this.

“We have saved our intended parents over $5 million in fees,” Levine said. “We have saved them over a century of waiting time because we are running 45 days on average to match. The average in America is nine to 18 months. You can have a baby on the Nodal platform before you get off the waitlist at a Nodal competitor.”

Advertisement

Levine knows the space well as a still-practicing physician with a speciality in obstetrics and gynecology. He got the idea for Nodal back in 2021 when New York became the 48th state to legalize gestational surrogacy; only Louisiana and Nebraska still don’t allow the practice. While Levine originally was excited that the ruling would open up opportunity for his patients in the state, that’s not exactly what happened.

“I was totally jazzed by this whole thing,” Levine said. “Very quickly I realized that it was truly a broken system. The cost had gone from $75,000 to $150,000 overnight. The reason it got so expensive is because supply and demand took hold. We are the largest fertility market in America; it literally drove up the price all over the country.”

The price increases weren’t benefiting the surrogates but rather padding the pockets of the matching agencies. Levine thought there must be a way to make this process better for both sides using technology, which led him to work on Nodal; it’s named after the protein that must be present in the uterus to be able to carry a baby.

The product officially launched in September 2022, is available in all 50 states, and has since matched 108 hopeful parents with a surrogate. The average clinic matches 25 a year, Levine said.

Advertisement

Now the startup is announcing a $4 million seed extension round led by NFX that gives the company a $15 million post-money valuation. The round also included Amplo, Liquid 2, and Myelin VC, among others. The company has raised $8.7 million in total.

Levine said that Nodal wanted to hit $10 million in annual recurring revenue before it raised their Series A round. He added that they didn’t really need to raise this round but thought it made sense as a reproductive health company amid the uncertainty surrounding the results of Tuesday’s U.S. presidential election.

“I didn’t know how this election was going to sway,” he said. “It would be myopic to not raise for women’s healthcare before the world potential changes into what could be a very challenging time for reproductive health.”

The company will invest the funds entirely into the technology, Levine said. Nodal wants to increase its partnerships with fertility clinics, too, so that more people can easily get referred to Nodal when they are looking to build a family.

Advertisement

Despite demand, there seemingly aren’t any direct competitors for Nodal beyond traditional surrogacy agencies, which are still just scratching the surface. Levine estimated that the current system fulfills less than 10% of overall demand for surrogates, which means Nodal can grab substantial market share. But it has a long way to go.

“From a big picture perspective, what I hope people take away is this is a company that is completely focused on transparency, speed, and safety,” Levine said. “It’s unfortunate that the industry has gotten where it is today. It’s opaque, analog, and clunky. We recognize that we have the opportunity to really help people.”

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Technology

Nintendo says its Switch successor will be backward compatible with Switch games

Published

on

What’s this new mystery Nintendo device?

Nintendo hasn’t announced its Switch successor yet, but we do know one thing for sure: it will be able to play current Switch games and have carryover for your Nintendo Switch Online services and account. The news was announced during Nintendo’s midyear policy briefing, with further information promised “at a later date.”

Nintendo also talked about numbers for the current Switch (PDF), noting that it sold 4.72 million units in the past three months, a drop of 31 percent compared to the same period last year but well above previous consoles eight years after they launched.

That adds up to 146 million Switch units sold and a new record for software sales on a Nintendo platform, which reached 1.3 billion units as of September 30th, 2024. It also noted that Switch Online subscriptions dropped slightly from last year to about 34 million members. At the same time, the number of people opting for the pricier version with the Expansion Pack library of games continues to increase.

According to the presentation, “More software has been played on Nintendo Switch than on any other Nintendo hardware.”

Advertisement

All three of the major console manufacturers have had spotty records with backward compatibility. Both the Xbox Series X and the PS5 are mostly backward-compatible. But since the transition from the Wii U involved going from discs to cartridges, the Switch is not. Playing a game from previous Nintendo consoles at the moment is a function of optimism, involving the hope that either Nintendo releases a remastered Switch port or brings the game to its Switch Online library, but that won’t be the case this time around.

According to Nintendo, the Switch 2 (or whatever it’s actually called) is still on schedule to be revealed during this fiscal year, which runs until the end of March 2025, without interrupting Nintendo’s existing connection with over 100 million annual Switch players.

The conversation about backward compatibility isn’t just about player satisfaction but also video game preservation. A report from the Video Game History Foundation found that over 87 percent of games released before 2010 are “critically endangered” or unavailable for purchase. While Nintendo has brought some of its back catalog to the Switch, there are still a lot of inaccessible games. Nintendo also directly contributed to the increasing scarcity of older games by shutting down the Wii U / 3DS e-shop last year.

Update, November 5th, 2024: Added additional details.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Technology

NYT Strands today — hints, answers and spangram for Wednesday, November 6 (game #248)

Published

on

NYT Strands homescreen on a mobile phone screen, on a light blue background

Strands is the NYT’s latest word game after the likes of Wordle, Spelling Bee and Connections – and it’s great fun. It can be difficult, though, so read on for my Strands hints.

Want more word-based fun? Then check out my Wordle today, NYT Connections today and Quordle today pages for hints and answers for those games.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Technology

Apple iPhone 16 Plus vs OnePlus 12R

Published

on

Apple iPhone 16 Plus vs OnePlus 12R

This time around we have a rather interesting comparison for you. We’re not comparing phones that have similar price tags, not at all. In this article, we’ll be comparing the Apple iPhone 16 Plus vs OnePlus 12R. The former costs twice as much, actually. The OnePlus 12R is shooting above its price range in terms of what it offers, and this comparison could actually surprise you. Apple did omit some features that it shouldn’t have, as it usually does, like a high refresh rate display.

It will be interesting to pit these two together and see what we come up with. As per usual, we’ll first list their specifications, and will then get down to comparing them across a number of other sections. These two devices are immensely different in pretty much every way, including design. So… it should be fun. Let’s get to it, shall we?

Specs

Apple iPhone 16 Plus vs OnePlus 12R, respectively

Screen size:
6.7-inch Super Retina XDR OLED ( flat, 60Hz, HDR, 2,000 nits)
6.78-inch LTPO4 AMOLED display (Curved, 120Hz LTPO, HDR10+, 4,500 nits)
Display resolution:
2796 x 1290
2780 x 1264
SoC:
Apple A18 (3nm)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
RAM:
8GB
8GB/16GB (LPDDR5X)
Storage:
128GB/256GB/512GB (NVMe)
128GB/256GB (UFS 3.1)
Rear cameras:
48MP (wide, f/1.6 aperture, 1/1.56-inch sensor, 1.0um pixel size, sensor-shift OIS), 12MP (ultrawide, f/2.2 aperture, 120-degree FoV, 0.7um pixel size, PDAF)
50MP (f/1.8 aperture, 24mm lens, 1.0um pixel size, OIS, PDAF, Laser AF), 8MP (ultrawide, f/2.2 aperture, 16mm lens, 1.12um pixel size), 2MP (macro, f/2.4 aperture)
Front cameras:
12MP (f/1.9 aperture, PDAF, 1/3.6-inch sensor size,)
16MP (f/2.4 aperture, 26mm lens, 1.0um pixel size)
Battery:
4,674mAh
5,500mAh
Charging:
30W wired, 25W MagSafe wireless, 15W Qi2 wireless, 7.5W Qi wireless, 4.5W reverse wired (charger not included)
100W wired (charger included)
Dimensions:
160.9 x 77.8 x 7.8 mm
163.3 x 75.3 x 8.8mm
Weight:
199 grams
207 grams
Connectivity:
5G, LTE, NFC, Wi-Fi, USB Type-C, Bluetooth 5.3
Security:
Face ID (3D facial scanning)
In-display fingerprint scanner (optical) & facial scanning
OS:
iOS 18
Android 14 with OxygenOS 14
Price:
$899+
$429+
Buy:
Apple iPhone 16 Plus (Apple)
OnePlus 12R (Best Buy)

Advertisement

Apple iPhone 16 Plus vs OnePlus 12R: Design

The moment you see these two devices you’ll realize the different approaches these companies had. The iPhone 16 Plus is made out of metal and glass, and it’s a lot flatter overall. It has a flat front, flat back, and flat frame all around. Only its corners are rounded. The OnePlus 12R is made out of metal and glass too, but its front and back are curved. Yes, it has a curved display. Its frame is far from being flat.

The iPhone 16 Plus has a pill-shaped cutout on the front and uniform bezels. The OnePlus 12R includes a display camera hole, which is centered, so a much smaller cutout. It also has thin bezels, but they’re not uniform. However, the OnePlus 12R does have a higher screen-to-body ratio, hence thinner bezels. On the back, you’ll find two vertically-aligned cameras on the iPhone 16 Plus, in the top-left corner. OnePlus’ handset has three cameras which are a part of a camera oreo, in the top-left corner too.

Apple’s handset has more buttons overall. It includes a power/lock button on the right, along with a Camera Control button. On the left, it includes volume rocker keys and an Action Button. The OnePlus 12R has a power/lock key on the right, right below the volume up and down buttons. On the left, you’ll find an alert slider. Both phones are water and dust-resistant, but the iPhone 16 Plus comes with a better IP68 rating, compared to the IP64 rating the OnePlus 12R offers.

OnePlus’ handset has a slightly larger display, and the phone is taller, narrower, and thicker than the iPhone 16 Plus. It’s also 8 grams heavier, by the way. The in-hand feel between the two is vastly different, though both are quite slippery.

Advertisement

Apple iPhone 16 Plus vs OnePlus 12R: Display

There is a 6.7-inch 2796 x 1290 Super Retina XDR OLED display included on the iPhone 16 Plus. That panel is flat, and it has a 60Hz refresh rate, so not a high refresh rate. It supports HDR10 content, and Dolby Vision too. The peak brightness here is 2,000 nits, and the screen-to-body ratio is 88%. The display aspect ratio is 19.5:9, while the Ceramic Shield glass protects this display.

AH OnePlus 12R Review (6)

The OnePlus 12R, on the flip side, has a 6.78-inch 2780 x 1264 LTPO4 AMOLED display. That panel is curved, and it offers a 120Hz refresh rate. It can project up to 1 billion colors, and it supports HDR10+ content and Dolby Vision. The peak brightness here is 4,500 nits, while the screen-to-body ratio is around 91%. The Gorilla Glass Victus 2 from Corning is here to protect this panel.

Both of these displays are vivid and have great viewing angles. Both of them are also more than sharp enough and have good touch response. The thing is, the OnePlus 12R’s panel does get a bit brighter, and it also offers a high refresh rate. If you notice the difference between refresh rates, and the vast majority of people do, that will be a considerable jump. Do note the display curvature difference here too. The OnePlus 12R technically has a better display out of the two. Apple, for some reason, decided to stick with a 60Hz panel, which is difficult to understand considering the price tag here.

Apple iPhone 16 Plus vs OnePlus 12R: Performance

Apple’s handset is fueled by the Apple A18 processor, the company’s 3nm chip. Apple paired that with 8GB of RAM and NVMe flash storage. The OnePlus 12R, on the flip side, is fueled by the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chip, a 4nm processor. The phone also includes up to 12GB of LPDDR5X RAM and UFS 3.1 flash storage. Apple’s handset does have a more powerful chip here.

Advertisement

The performance between the two is basically on par in terms of everyday use. Both phones are very snappy regardless of what you do with them. It’s actually a real chore getting either phone to slow down. They’re great for general app use, browsing, multimedia consumption, messaging, and so on. The iPhone 16 Plus will have an edge when it comes to truly demanding games, but in all honesty, we did not really notice much of a difference.

The OnePlus 12R was able to run basically any game that we threw at it from the Google Play Store, without a problem. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 may be inferior, but it’s still an outstanding processor capable of running basically any game, with ease. So… even though the iPhone 16 Plus will likely have a longer shelf life, at the moment, the two phones are on par in terms of performance feel when you actually use them.

Apple iPhone 16 Plus vs OnePlus 12R: Battery

Apple’s handset has a 4,674mAh battery on the inside. The OnePlus 12R, on the other hand, includes a 5,500mAh unit. Apple’s iPhones usually have smaller batteries than their Android counterparts, so don’t pay too much attention to the capacity itself. With that being said, both of these smartphones are battery monsters. The OnePlus 12R offers outstanding battery life, but the iPhone 16 Plus is a tough competitor.

The iPhone 16 Plus has one of the best battery life results out there at the moment, so it does trump the OnePlus 12R. However, regardless of which of the two phones you end up getting, chances are you’ll be more than happy. Even if you’re a power user both of these phones have enough juice to get you through the day. Getting over 7 hours of screen-on-time is not much of a problem, especially on the iPhone 16 Plus, at least from what we’ve seen.

Advertisement

In terms of charging, the iPhone 16 Plus is more versatile, but the OnePlus 12R wipes the floor with it in terms of sheer charging speed. The OnePlus 12R supports 100W wired charging, while the iPhone 16 Plus offers 30W wired, 25W MagSafe wireless, 15W Qi2 wireless, 7.5W Qi wireless, and 4.5W reverse wired charging. Do note that only the OnePlus 12R ships with a charger, though.

Apple iPhone 16 Plus vs OnePlus 12R: Cameras

The iPhone 16 Plus comes with a 48-megapixel main camera (1/1.56-inch sensor) and a 12-megapixel ultrawide unit (120-degree FoV). The OnePlus 12R, on the flip side, includes a 50-megapixel unit (1/1.56-inch sensor), an 8-megapixel ultrawide camera (112-degree FoV), and a 2-megapixel macro shooter. Both phones do a good job with photography, but neither is close to competing with the very best.

AH OnePlus 12R Review (2)

The OnePlus 12R misses Hasselblad’s color calibration, but despite that, it manages to provide really good results. There’s not much to complain about its main camera performance, across different scenarios, the images end up looking really good, and somewhat contrasty. The iPhone 16 Plus does provide images with warmer tones, though it also does a good job across the board. The images do end up looking different, and the ones in low light, a hair darker.

In regards to the ultrawide camera, the iPhone 16 Plus wins. It simply provides better images in almost every way. They end up providing more details and end up being better-balanced. The macro camera on the OnePlus 12R is forgettable, 2-megapixel macro cameras should not be a thing, at all. In regards to video, that’s an easy win for the iPhone 16 Plus, even though the OnePlus 12R can shoot solid video content.

Advertisement

Audio

Both of these smartphones have a set of stereo speakers. Those speakers are actually rather good, and more than loud enough. In fact, they’re very close in terms of overall loudness, and output quality too.

There is no audio jack on either phone. You can, however, hook up your audio headphones to the Type-C port on either devices. If you prefer wireless audio, Bluetooth 5.3 is supported by both smartphones.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Science & Environment

Crypto’s $245 million campaign finance operation funded non-crypto ads

Published

on

Coinbase-backed lobby urges ABC to ask Trump, Harris about crypto


Stand With Crypto’s bus tour through five battleground states kicked off last week in Phoenix and Las Vegas.

Logan Dobson/Stand With Crypto Alliance

Advertisement

LAS VEGAS — In Nevada’s 4th Congressional District, a crypto PAC spent nearly $2 million on ads this cycle to support the reelection of Steven Horsford, a Democratic congressman who’s voted in favor of some major pro-crypto bills.

But watching the ads, you’d learn nothing about that agenda.

“He’s leading on jobs, bringing good paying union jobs to Nevada and rebuilding our infrastructure,” one 30-second commercial says. “He capped insulin prices at $35 a month,” and “worked multiple jobs to support his hard working single mother and siblings in Congress.”

The ad wraps up with the disclosure, “Fairshake is responsible for the content of this ad.”

Advertisement

Fairshake was the largest crypto-aligned super PAC in the 2024 election cycle, spending piles of cash to support crypto allies and vote out antagonists across the country. The group brought in $170 million, accounting for a huge chunk of the amount raised by crypto-related PACs and other groups, which totaled more than $245 million, according to Federal Election Commission data.

Crypto has accounted for nearly half of all corporate money flowing into the election, according to a report from nonprofit watchdog Public Citizen. No other sector is close. That includes oil companies and banks, which have historically been big political contributors. Crypto even outpaced Elon Musk, the world’s richest person, who spent tens of millions of dollars to try and get Republican nominee Donald Trump back in the White House in his contest against Democratic Vice President Kamala Harris.

A big part of the crypto industry’s strategy when it came to distributing cash was to identify key races and then flood the zone.

Industry advocacy group Stand With Crypto Alliance, launched by Coinbase last year, developed a grading system for the presidential race and for House and Senate candidates across the country, helping it determine where to spend.

Advertisement
Bitcoin hits three-month high as bipartisan support of crypto industry fuels spot ETF inflows

Horsford received an A grade based on his public comments and his voting history while in office. His campaign received money from Fairshake as well as individual donations from Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong, Ripple co-founder Chris Larsen, venture capitalist and longtime crypto investor Reid Hoffman and billionaire twins Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss.

Nevada is home to two of the thirteen “critical elections” singled out by Stand with Crypto, a designation the group defines as races that are “critical to the future of crypto in America.” In addition to Horsford’s election, the other Nevada race is the Senate contest between Democratic incumbent Jackie Rosen and Republican challenger Sam Brown. Both candidates received an A grade.

According to data shared by Stand with Crypto, 385,000 Nevadans are crypto owners, and more than 16,000 people in the state have signed up to be advocates for the group, which made a stop in Las Vegas in September as part of a multi-state tour.

The other races deemed critical were for Senate in Montana, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Arizona, Massachusetts, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Maryland, and for specific House contests in Colorado, Iowa and Oregon.

To reach potential voters, Fairshake isn’t talking a lot about crypto. Nor are its affiliate PACs, which have names like Defend American Jobs and Protect Progress. They’ve collectively spent more than $135 million this cycle, mostly on ads.

Advertisement

“Not mentioning crypto assets explicitly is probably a savvy move to avoid alienating voters who prefer traditional currencies and might be put off by connections to crypto,” said David Nickerson, an associate professor of political science at Temple University who worked in the analytics department for President Barack Obama’s re-election campaign in 2012.

The biggest single target of crypto money this cycle was Ohio Sen. Sherrod Brown, the Democratic chair of the Senate Banking Committee. Brown backed Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., in holding hearings on whether digital tokens were tied to terrorism.

In December, Brown told journalists that he wasn’t concerned about the crypto industry’s rumblings against him.

“Bring em’ on,” Politico quoted Brown as saying to a crowd of reporters.

Advertisement

Some $40 million of crypto money has been directed at defeating Brown, and one PAC has paid for five ads designed to boost awareness of Republican rival Bernie Moreno, a blockchain entrepreneur. The race is crucial in determining which party will control the Senate.

Protect Progress, a PAC affiliated with Fairshake, has given more than $10 million apiece to Senate candidates in Arizona and Michigan. In Arizona, the group favors Democrat Ruben Gallego, who is vying for the seat being vacated by Kyrsten Sinema. In Michigan, the preferred choice is Elissa Slotkin, who is currently a Democratic House member.

Democratic Rep. Katie Porter lost in the primary for the California Senate after Fairshake spent over $10 million in ads against her. Defend American Jobs spent more than $3 million to support Republican Jim Justice in West Virginia, who has been declared the winner in West Virginia, replacing exiting Democratic Sen. Joe Manchin.

WATCH: Jay Clayton on regulation

Advertisement
Jay Clayton on regulation: This is the biggest difference between each candidate's policy



Source link

Continue Reading

Technology

New report details ‘vast spying’ by China-linked telecom hackers

Published

on

New report details ‘vast spying’ by China-linked telecom hackers

New details are continuing to surface about the hacking of US telecom companies by a China-linked group that US officials and campaign staffers. Now, The Wall Street Journal that the hackers’ access was even greater than what’s been previously reported, and that the communications of “potentially thousands of Americans” may have been impacted.

Last week, The New York Times reported that FBI investigators suspected call logs and SMS messages had been accessed by the hacking group, known as “Salt Typhoon.” The group reportedly targeted the phones of diplomats and government officials, as well as people associated with both presidential campaigns.

Now, The WSJ is reporting that the hackers, who were “likely” working for a Chinese intelligence agency, spent “eight months or more” in US telecom infrastructure, and that they may have been able to scoop up the data of thousands of people who were in contact with the targeted individuals.

The Journal confirms earlier reports that the hackers “limited their targets to several dozen select, high-value political and national-security figures.” But the hackers, who reportedly exploited routers used by telecom firms, had “the ability to access the phone data of virtually any American who is a customer of a compromised carrier — a group that includes AT&T and Verizon.” Both AT&T and Verizon declined to comment on the report.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Technology

Take This clinical director resigns from mental health for game devs nonprofit

Published

on

Take This clinical director resigns from mental health for game devs nonprofit

Raffael “Dr. B” Boccamazzo, the clinical director of Take This, will leave the nonprofit for gaming mental health at the end of this year.

Take This made the announcement after Boccamazzo posted the change on his LinkedIn account.

“It’s been a year of transition at Take This, and it is with bittersweet sentiment that we share that Dr. B, Take This’ clinical director, will be leaving at the end of this year,” Take This said on its web site. “We want to express our heartfelt appreciation for Dr. B’s decade of dedication to Take This. His kindness, insight, and knowledge has been invaluable, and his impact on the Take This team and community will not be forgotten. Below is a heartfelt letter from Dr. B about the upcoming change.”

Boccamazzo joined Take This as a volunteer/staffer in 2014. It was started to serve the game industry in 2012 by Russ Pitts and Mark Kline after the suicide of game journalist Matt Hughes. Kline served as the founding clinical director and Boccamazzo replaced him after Kline left. Boccamazzo’s pending departure comes just a week after Eve Crevoshay, longtime executive director, also resigned from Take This. Kelli Dunlap filled Crevoshay’s role.

Advertisement
Eve Crevoshay received the Vanguard Award from Games for Change.
Eve Crevoshay received the Vanguard Award from Games for Change.

“There’s so much I’m proud to have done with the org,” Boccamazzo said. “However, the truth is that nonprofit life is hard. Since I became a dad earlier this year, I find my focus is more on my family. I can’t commit to all the extra hours required of being a director at a small nonprofit organization while maintaining the focus on my family that they deserve.”

He added, “I’d end up underserving everyone on both sides of that coin. As my schedule allows, I’d eventually like to find ways to support the org in a more limited capacity, but for now I need to focus on me and my family.”

Both Crevoshay and Boccamazzo were frequent speakers at game industry events where they stressed the importance of mental health for game developers. And they both spoke at GamesBeat events. Boccamazzo spoke in 2021 in a virtual GamesBeat event on how to avoid burnout as well as a panel on employee mental health in 2022. Crevoshay received the Vanguard Award from Games for Change and she also received our Up-and-Comer Award for GamesBeat.

Boccamazzo said he looked forward to the remaining staff at Take This to take the organization and continue its mission.

“I don’t entirely know what’s next for me, other than focusing on my family and the psychology practice I run,” Boccamazzo said. “I’d like to keep at least one toe dipped in games. If you might need a psychologist with a decade of experience working within the game industry on things like burnout, mental health representation in media, content creator mental health, tabletop roleplaying games, crunch culture, and other things, I’ll be around, and I’d love to hear from you.”

Advertisement

Source link
Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 WordupNews.com