Connect with us

Technology

Apple iPhone 16 Plus vs OnePlus 12R

Published

on

Apple iPhone 16 Plus vs OnePlus 12R

This time around we have a rather interesting comparison for you. We’re not comparing phones that have similar price tags, not at all. In this article, we’ll be comparing the Apple iPhone 16 Plus vs OnePlus 12R. The former costs twice as much, actually. The OnePlus 12R is shooting above its price range in terms of what it offers, and this comparison could actually surprise you. Apple did omit some features that it shouldn’t have, as it usually does, like a high refresh rate display.

It will be interesting to pit these two together and see what we come up with. As per usual, we’ll first list their specifications, and will then get down to comparing them across a number of other sections. These two devices are immensely different in pretty much every way, including design. So… it should be fun. Let’s get to it, shall we?

Specs

Apple iPhone 16 Plus vs OnePlus 12R, respectively

Screen size:
6.7-inch Super Retina XDR OLED ( flat, 60Hz, HDR, 2,000 nits)
6.78-inch LTPO4 AMOLED display (Curved, 120Hz LTPO, HDR10+, 4,500 nits)
Display resolution:
2796 x 1290
2780 x 1264
SoC:
Apple A18 (3nm)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
RAM:
8GB
8GB/16GB (LPDDR5X)
Storage:
128GB/256GB/512GB (NVMe)
128GB/256GB (UFS 3.1)
Rear cameras:
48MP (wide, f/1.6 aperture, 1/1.56-inch sensor, 1.0um pixel size, sensor-shift OIS), 12MP (ultrawide, f/2.2 aperture, 120-degree FoV, 0.7um pixel size, PDAF)
50MP (f/1.8 aperture, 24mm lens, 1.0um pixel size, OIS, PDAF, Laser AF), 8MP (ultrawide, f/2.2 aperture, 16mm lens, 1.12um pixel size), 2MP (macro, f/2.4 aperture)
Front cameras:
12MP (f/1.9 aperture, PDAF, 1/3.6-inch sensor size,)
16MP (f/2.4 aperture, 26mm lens, 1.0um pixel size)
Battery:
4,674mAh
5,500mAh
Charging:
30W wired, 25W MagSafe wireless, 15W Qi2 wireless, 7.5W Qi wireless, 4.5W reverse wired (charger not included)
100W wired (charger included)
Dimensions:
160.9 x 77.8 x 7.8 mm
163.3 x 75.3 x 8.8mm
Weight:
199 grams
207 grams
Connectivity:
5G, LTE, NFC, Wi-Fi, USB Type-C, Bluetooth 5.3
Security:
Face ID (3D facial scanning)
In-display fingerprint scanner (optical) & facial scanning
OS:
iOS 18
Android 14 with OxygenOS 14
Price:
$899+
$429+
Buy:
Apple iPhone 16 Plus (Apple)
OnePlus 12R (Best Buy)

Advertisement

Apple iPhone 16 Plus vs OnePlus 12R: Design

The moment you see these two devices you’ll realize the different approaches these companies had. The iPhone 16 Plus is made out of metal and glass, and it’s a lot flatter overall. It has a flat front, flat back, and flat frame all around. Only its corners are rounded. The OnePlus 12R is made out of metal and glass too, but its front and back are curved. Yes, it has a curved display. Its frame is far from being flat.

The iPhone 16 Plus has a pill-shaped cutout on the front and uniform bezels. The OnePlus 12R includes a display camera hole, which is centered, so a much smaller cutout. It also has thin bezels, but they’re not uniform. However, the OnePlus 12R does have a higher screen-to-body ratio, hence thinner bezels. On the back, you’ll find two vertically-aligned cameras on the iPhone 16 Plus, in the top-left corner. OnePlus’ handset has three cameras which are a part of a camera oreo, in the top-left corner too.

Apple’s handset has more buttons overall. It includes a power/lock button on the right, along with a Camera Control button. On the left, it includes volume rocker keys and an Action Button. The OnePlus 12R has a power/lock key on the right, right below the volume up and down buttons. On the left, you’ll find an alert slider. Both phones are water and dust-resistant, but the iPhone 16 Plus comes with a better IP68 rating, compared to the IP64 rating the OnePlus 12R offers.

OnePlus’ handset has a slightly larger display, and the phone is taller, narrower, and thicker than the iPhone 16 Plus. It’s also 8 grams heavier, by the way. The in-hand feel between the two is vastly different, though both are quite slippery.

Advertisement

Apple iPhone 16 Plus vs OnePlus 12R: Display

There is a 6.7-inch 2796 x 1290 Super Retina XDR OLED display included on the iPhone 16 Plus. That panel is flat, and it has a 60Hz refresh rate, so not a high refresh rate. It supports HDR10 content, and Dolby Vision too. The peak brightness here is 2,000 nits, and the screen-to-body ratio is 88%. The display aspect ratio is 19.5:9, while the Ceramic Shield glass protects this display.

AH OnePlus 12R Review (6)

The OnePlus 12R, on the flip side, has a 6.78-inch 2780 x 1264 LTPO4 AMOLED display. That panel is curved, and it offers a 120Hz refresh rate. It can project up to 1 billion colors, and it supports HDR10+ content and Dolby Vision. The peak brightness here is 4,500 nits, while the screen-to-body ratio is around 91%. The Gorilla Glass Victus 2 from Corning is here to protect this panel.

Both of these displays are vivid and have great viewing angles. Both of them are also more than sharp enough and have good touch response. The thing is, the OnePlus 12R’s panel does get a bit brighter, and it also offers a high refresh rate. If you notice the difference between refresh rates, and the vast majority of people do, that will be a considerable jump. Do note the display curvature difference here too. The OnePlus 12R technically has a better display out of the two. Apple, for some reason, decided to stick with a 60Hz panel, which is difficult to understand considering the price tag here.

Apple iPhone 16 Plus vs OnePlus 12R: Performance

Apple’s handset is fueled by the Apple A18 processor, the company’s 3nm chip. Apple paired that with 8GB of RAM and NVMe flash storage. The OnePlus 12R, on the flip side, is fueled by the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chip, a 4nm processor. The phone also includes up to 12GB of LPDDR5X RAM and UFS 3.1 flash storage. Apple’s handset does have a more powerful chip here.

Advertisement

The performance between the two is basically on par in terms of everyday use. Both phones are very snappy regardless of what you do with them. It’s actually a real chore getting either phone to slow down. They’re great for general app use, browsing, multimedia consumption, messaging, and so on. The iPhone 16 Plus will have an edge when it comes to truly demanding games, but in all honesty, we did not really notice much of a difference.

The OnePlus 12R was able to run basically any game that we threw at it from the Google Play Store, without a problem. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 may be inferior, but it’s still an outstanding processor capable of running basically any game, with ease. So… even though the iPhone 16 Plus will likely have a longer shelf life, at the moment, the two phones are on par in terms of performance feel when you actually use them.

Apple iPhone 16 Plus vs OnePlus 12R: Battery

Apple’s handset has a 4,674mAh battery on the inside. The OnePlus 12R, on the other hand, includes a 5,500mAh unit. Apple’s iPhones usually have smaller batteries than their Android counterparts, so don’t pay too much attention to the capacity itself. With that being said, both of these smartphones are battery monsters. The OnePlus 12R offers outstanding battery life, but the iPhone 16 Plus is a tough competitor.

The iPhone 16 Plus has one of the best battery life results out there at the moment, so it does trump the OnePlus 12R. However, regardless of which of the two phones you end up getting, chances are you’ll be more than happy. Even if you’re a power user both of these phones have enough juice to get you through the day. Getting over 7 hours of screen-on-time is not much of a problem, especially on the iPhone 16 Plus, at least from what we’ve seen.

Advertisement

In terms of charging, the iPhone 16 Plus is more versatile, but the OnePlus 12R wipes the floor with it in terms of sheer charging speed. The OnePlus 12R supports 100W wired charging, while the iPhone 16 Plus offers 30W wired, 25W MagSafe wireless, 15W Qi2 wireless, 7.5W Qi wireless, and 4.5W reverse wired charging. Do note that only the OnePlus 12R ships with a charger, though.

Apple iPhone 16 Plus vs OnePlus 12R: Cameras

The iPhone 16 Plus comes with a 48-megapixel main camera (1/1.56-inch sensor) and a 12-megapixel ultrawide unit (120-degree FoV). The OnePlus 12R, on the flip side, includes a 50-megapixel unit (1/1.56-inch sensor), an 8-megapixel ultrawide camera (112-degree FoV), and a 2-megapixel macro shooter. Both phones do a good job with photography, but neither is close to competing with the very best.

AH OnePlus 12R Review (2)

The OnePlus 12R misses Hasselblad’s color calibration, but despite that, it manages to provide really good results. There’s not much to complain about its main camera performance, across different scenarios, the images end up looking really good, and somewhat contrasty. The iPhone 16 Plus does provide images with warmer tones, though it also does a good job across the board. The images do end up looking different, and the ones in low light, a hair darker.

In regards to the ultrawide camera, the iPhone 16 Plus wins. It simply provides better images in almost every way. They end up providing more details and end up being better-balanced. The macro camera on the OnePlus 12R is forgettable, 2-megapixel macro cameras should not be a thing, at all. In regards to video, that’s an easy win for the iPhone 16 Plus, even though the OnePlus 12R can shoot solid video content.

Advertisement

Audio

Both of these smartphones have a set of stereo speakers. Those speakers are actually rather good, and more than loud enough. In fact, they’re very close in terms of overall loudness, and output quality too.

There is no audio jack on either phone. You can, however, hook up your audio headphones to the Type-C port on either devices. If you prefer wireless audio, Bluetooth 5.3 is supported by both smartphones.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Technology

You’ll be able to play your Nintendo Switch games on its successor

Published

on

You'll be able to play your Nintendo Switch games on its successor

You don’t have to take great pains to preserve your Switch to ensure that you can still play your favorite games on it years and years from now. Nintendo has revealed in its earnings report that the upcoming successor to the Switch will have backwards compatibility and will be able to run games made for the current console. In addition, Switch Online will also be available on the Switch 2, which means your saves stored on the cloud will be carried over and you’ll be able to play NES, SNES and Game Boy titles on the new console.

Nintendo explained that it’s making Switch Online available on the upcoming console, because it thinks it’s important for the company’s future to “carry over the good relationship” it has built with its more than 100 million annual playing users to the new device. The main way to do so is to make use of the Nintendo Account, which ties a user’s history to one account and enables the company to “maintain a continuous relationship” with them across console generations. Before the Nintendo Account was introduced, Nintendo had no easy way to carry a user’s history and purchases over to the next console. “As a result, our relationship with the consumers was interrupted when a new system was purchased,” it said.

The company promised to reveal more information about the Switch 2 “at a later date,” though it didn’t say when exactly. In a recent event where we thought the new Switch could be announced, Nintendo launched an alarm clock instead. Based on its earnings results, it looks like people could be choosing to wait for the new console instead of buying the current Switch: The company had to downgrade its sales forecast for the fiscal year due to a big decline in console sales compared to the same periods last year.

Source link

Continue Reading

Technology

Microsoft’s new Magnetic-One system directs multiple AI agents to complete user tasks

Published

on

Microsoft's new Magnetic-One system directs multiple AI agents to complete user tasks

Join our daily and weekly newsletters for the latest updates and exclusive content on industry-leading AI coverage. Learn More


Enterprises looking to deploy multiple AI agents often need to implement a framework to manage them. 

To this end, Microsoft researchers recently unveiled a new multi-agent infrastructure called Magnetic-One that allows a single AI model to power various helper agents that work together to complete complex, multi-step tasks in different scenarios. Microsoft calls Magnetic-One a generalist agentic system that can “fully realize the long-held vision of agentic systems that can enhance our productivity and transform our lives.”

The framework is open-source and available to researchers and developers, including for commercial purposes, under a custom Microsoft License. In conjunction with the release of Magnetic-One, Microsoft also released an open-source agent evaluation tool called AutoGenBench to test agentic systems, built atop its previously released Autogen framework for multi-agent communication and cooperation.

Advertisement

The idea behind generalist agentic systems is to figure out how autonomous agents can solve tasks that require several steps to finish that are often found in the day to day running of an organization or even an individual’s daily life. 

From the examples Microsoft provided, it looks like the company hopes Magnetic-One fulfills almost mundane tasks. Researchers pointed Magnetic-One to tasks like describing trends in the S&P 500, finding and exporting missing citations, and even ordering a shawarma. 

How Magnetic-One works

Magnetic-One relies on an Orchestrator agent that directs four other agents. The Orchestrator not only manages the agents, directing them to do specific tasks, but also redirects them if there are errors.

The framework is composed of four types of agents other than the Orchestrator:

Advertisement
  • Websurfer agents can command Chromium-based web browsers and navigate to websites or perform web searches. It can also click and type, similar to Anthropic’s recently released Computer Use, and summarize content. 
  • FIleSurfer agents read local files list directories and go through folders.
  • Coder agents write codes, analyze information from other agents and create new artifacts.
  • ComputerTerminal provides a console where the Coder agent’s programs can be executed. 

The Orchestrator directs these agents and tracks their progress. It starts by planning how to tackle the task. It creates what Microsoft researchers call a task ledger that tracks the workflow. As the task continues, the Orchestrator builds a progress ledger “where it self-reflects on task progress and checks whether the task is completed.” The Orchestrator can assign an agent to complete each task or update the task ledger. The Orchestrator can create a new plan if the agents remain stuck. 

“Together, Magentic-One’s agents provide the Orchestrator with the tools and capabilities that it needs to solve a broad variety of open-ended problems, as well as the ability to autonomously adapt to, and act in, dynamic and ever-changing web and file-system environments,” the researchers wrote in the paper. 

While Microsoft developed Magnetic-One using OpenAI’s GPT-4o — OpenAI is after, all a Microsoft investment — it is LLM-agnostic, though the researchers “recommend a strong reasoning model for the Orchestrator agent such as GPT-4o.” 

Magnetic-One supports multiple models behind the agents, for example, developers can deploy a reasoning LLM for the Orchestrator agent and a mix of other LLMs or small language models to the different agents. Microsoft’s researchers experimented with a different Magnetic-One configuration “using OpenAI 01-preview for the outer loop of the Orchestrator and for the Coder, while other agents continue to use GPT-4o.”

The next step in agentic frameworks

Agentic systems are becoming more popular as more options to deploy agents, from off-the-shelf libraries of agents to customizable organization-specific agents, have arisen. Microsoft announced its own set of AI agents for the Dynamics 365 platform in October. 

Tech companies are now beginning to compete on AI orchestration frameworks, particularly systems that manage agentic workflows. OpenAI released its Swarm framework, which gives developers a simple yet flexible way to allow agents to guide agentic collaboration. CrewAI’s multi-agent builder also offers a way to manage agents. Meanwhile, most enterprises have relied on LangChain to help build agentic frameworks. 

Advertisement

However, AI agent deployment in the enterprise is still in its early stages, so figuring out the best multi-agent framework will continue to be an ongoing experiment. Most AI agents still play in their playground instead of talking to agents from other systems. As more enterprises begin using AI agents, managing that sprawl and ensuring AI agents seamlessly hand off work to each other to complete tasks is more crucial. 


Source link
Continue Reading

Technology

Swiggy IPO nets $606 million from institutional investors

Published

on

Invesco raises its valuation of Swiggy to $13.3B

Swiggy has raised around $606 million from a set of more than 75 anchor investors as part of its $1.35 billion initial public offering, as the Indian food delivery and quick commerce startup prepares for the country’s second-largest listing of the year next week.

The Bengaluru-based startup, which is seeking an $11.3 billion valuation in the IPO, received bids worth $15 billion for the $600 million portion. Indian institutional investors received about 56% of the overall anchor allocation, sources familiar with the matter said. Eight of the top 10 Indian mutual funds have invested in the anchor round.

The anchor investors include BlackRock, Fidelity, Norges Bank, BNP Paribas, HSBC, Nomura, Jane Street, Citadel, Motilal Oswal, Kotak, and 360 One, as well as mutual funds and insurance units operated by Indian lenders SBI, ICICI, Kotak, and HDFC, the sources said, requesting anonymity.

In an exchange filing, following the publication of the story, Swiggy confirmed the fundraise.

Advertisement

Swiggy, which counts Prosus, SoftBank, Accel, and Coatue among its backers, competes with firms including Zomato and Nexus-backed Zepto.

Source link

Continue Reading

Technology

How to stop the Electoral College from invading your home screen

Published

on

How to stop the Electoral College from invading your home screen

Some iOS users with the Washington Post app installed may have looked down at their device tonight only to find an undismissable black toggle hovering on their screen, with electoral vote counts in the 2024 presidential race slowly ticking upwards. (On my own iPhone it appears as the dynamic island.) If you tap on it it merely expands to give you more information about the race, along with little drawn portraits of the candidates, which is decidedly not the content you want if you were just trying to find the button to make the whole thing go away.

It took me a little bit of jumping around to figure out how to get rid of it, but this is how to dismiss the Electoral College hell-toggle on iOS:

Go to your Settings. Select Apps towards the bottom. Scroll down to the Wash Post app. Click on Live Activities. Turn off the toggle Allow Live Activities. The hell-toggle should vanish.

Turn off “Allow Live Activities” if you want to get rid of the electoral count toggle.
Advertisement

If you want to bring it back, turn on Allow Live Activities again, and then go into the Washington Post app. Click on the gear wheel icon in the upper right to access your settings. Select Live Activity Settings and turn on the toggle to allow live updates from the presidential election. You may need to also click on “Start Presidential Activity” beneath that.

Apparently Apple News also has a hell-toggle, and it presumably can be dismissed in your iOS settings in a similar fashion. I am not plagued with the Apple News hell-toggle, so I wouldn’t know.

Source link

Continue Reading

Technology

Quordle today – hints and answers for Wednesday, November 6 (game #1017)

Published

on

Quordle on a smartphone held in a hand

Quordle was one of the original Wordle alternatives and is still going strong now more than 1,000 games later. It offers a genuine challenge, though, so read on if you need some Quordle hints today – or scroll down further for the answers.

Enjoy playing word games? You can also check out my Wordle today, NYT Connections today and NYT Strands today pages for hints and answers for those puzzles.

Source link

Continue Reading

Science & Environment

Solar stocks tumble overnight as Trump leads in election results

Published

on

Solar stocks tumble overnight as Trump leads in election results


Copper Mountain Solar in El Dorado Valley, pictured on Thursday, Sept. 5, 2024, in Boulder City, Nevada. (Bizuayehu Tesfaye/Las Vegas Review-Journal/Tribune News Service via Getty Images)

Bizuayehu Tesfaye | Tribune News Service | Getty Images

Solar stocks sold off overnight as investors see Donald Trump leading in the U.S. presidential election.

Solar stocks are falling on fears that a possible Trump victory would spell trouble for the Inflation Reduction Act, which has fueled a clean energy boom in the U.S. through tax credits to expand solar energy.

Advertisement

The benchmark Invesco Solar ETF was down 7% in overnight trading on brokerage Robinhood. The solar panel manufacturer First Solar tumbled 8% overnight. Residential solar stocks Sunrun and Sunnova fell 6% and 2.6%, respectively. Inverter manufacturer Enphase tumbled 5% and Nextracker was down nearly 5%.

Trump’s campaign platform calls for the termination of the IRA, which he refers to as the “Socialist Green New Deal.” The IRA is one of President Joe Biden’s signature achievements. The law passed on party-line vote in 2022 without any Republican support.

Trump is leading in the electoral college and is projected to win the key swing state of North Carolina, according to NBC News. The future of the IRA, however, will depend not only on whether Trump wins the White House, but whether Republicans also secure control of Congress.

Kamala Harris’ campaign chair Jen O’Malley Dillon told staff in an email Tuesday that the clearest path to victory for the vice president lies in the so-called Blue Wall states of Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 WordupNews.com