The Eastern European country of Moldova is continuing efforts to attract overseas firms, as it tries to move past political uncertainty.
“I went with a backpack, and set up a business,” says Dutch entrepreneur Luc Vocks, recalling how he moved to Moldova in 2007.
Mr Vocks had first visited the former Soviet republic three years earlier, and recalls experiencing “the cliché that one would have of Eastern Europe at that time”.
“Everything was dirt cheap, and if you were a foreigner you’d get attention,” he says.
Advertisement
Today, Mr Vocks is the owner of a Moldovan company called DevelopmentAid. Based in the capital Chisinau, it employs 180 people in the country, and runs a website that lists job vacancies in the international development community.
Mr Vocks is one of a growing number of foreign entrepreneurs in Moldova. The government wants to attract more like him and hopes that low business tax rates will help.
The country’s standard corporation tax rate – the amount that firms have to pay on their profits – is just 12%. This compares with 25% in the UK, and 25.8% in the Netherlands where Mr Vocks had initially launched his company before relocating it to Moldova.
There’s an even better deal for tech firms. In 2018 the Moldovan government launched an initiative to grow the country’s IT sector – the Moldova IT Park (MITP).
Advertisement
This isn’t a physical business park. Instead it is virtual scheme open to all IT firms in the country – and those that wish to move there from overseas. Firms that sign up only have to pay a corporation tax rate of 7%.
The MITP is part of a wider effort by the Moldovan government to modernise and expand its economy ahead of a bid to join the European Union in 2030.
This drive is being led by Moldova’s pro-EU President Maia Sandu, who this week was re-elected for a second term. And last month Moldovans voted “yes” on pro-EU constitutional changes.
However, the vote was extremely close, with Yes getting 50.46% and No receiving 49.54%. Although Russia denied interfering in the vote, Moldova’s authorities said attempts had been made to buy up to 300,000 votes in what Maia Sandu described as an “unprecedented assault on freedom and democracy”.
Advertisement
Moscow is opposed to Moldova joining the EU, and supports Moldova’s breakaway region of Transnistria economically, politically and militarily.
Dumitru Alaiba, Moldova’s deputy prime minister and minister for economic development and digitalisation, is positive about where Moldova is heading.
“Moldova in the past 10 to 15 years has really proven that it’s a country that can change very fast,” he tells the BBC.
“This used to be a highly corrupt country, a country where, exactly 10 years ago, a billion dollars from our central banks just disappeared.”
Advertisement
“We are moving very fast towards joining the EU, and we are reforming our economy at top speed. Of course, we have a long way to go.”
He pointed to Moldova’s rise on the global Corruption Perceptions Index, produced by anti-corruption watchdog Transparency International.
Out of 180 countries – with a lower placing meaning that a country is less corrupt – Moldova is now in 76th place, up from 91st a year earlier.
“Now entrepreneurs can breathe freely without fear of repercussion, without fear of corrupt inspectors, without fear of a filthy justice sector that commits crazy abuses.”
Advertisement
Mr Vocks agrees that Moldova is now a much easier place in which to do business than when he first set up his company there back in 2007.
“Back then, it was extremely bureaucratic. It was hard to get a residence permit. It was painful to register a company, especially as a foreigner.
“It was painful intersecting with the tax agency. The banks were rough to work with.”
Member companies of the MITP don’t just benefit from the 7% corporation tax rate. They also don’t need to make employer social security contributions, and staff don’t have to pay income tax. Mr Volks signed up DevelopmentAid almost immediately.
Advertisement
The MITP has also simplified immigration procedures through the IT Visa program.
More than 2,000 companies are now registered with the MITP, 300 of which have come from overseas. The most common countries these have moved from being the US, UK, Germany, Netherlands, and Ukraine.
In the first half of 2024, MITP firms generated a combined €365m ($397m; £308m) in revenues, according to official figures. And now employing 22,000 people in general, they are said to contribute around 6% of the country’s GDP.
While the MITP scheme has worked to boost Moldova’s IT sector, the influx of foreign tech companies has driven up salaries in the industry considerably.
Advertisement
Sven Wiese, a German expat who has set up a small IT services business in the country called Trabia, says he is now finding himself priced out when it comes to employee pay.
He says that the biggest firms signed up to the MITP can offer IT specialists more than €100,000 a year, “because that is still cheaper than hiring people within a bigger country like the US or Germany”.
At the same time he says that many Moldovan IT sector workers still want to leave the country. “Fewer people are now leaving Moldova, but emigration is still high.”
Another negative issue is the continuing war in neighbouring Ukraine, which is likely making some Western IT firms think twice about investing in Moldova. Mr Alaiba says is confident that Moldova is safe “as long as the free world is supporting Ukraine”.
Advertisement
Marina Bzovii, MITP’s administrator and an assistant professor at the Technical University of Moldova, already sees Moldova as a regional business hub. “Moldova is connecting even Central Asia, countries like Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan, who are culturally much further from Europe.
“However, Moldova understands both of the cultures. So it’s the kind of business hub that Europe needs… and Chisinau is now really vibrant.”
Far from “protecting the family farm”, as claimed by Tom Bradshaw, president of the National Farmers’ Union (Opinion, FT.com, November 5), the inheritance tax loophole on farmland, introduced in 1984, simply pushed up the price of land without improving returns to active farmers.
This is because, like most agricultural subsidies, the value of the relief was capitalised into land values. As tax planners cottoned on to its role as a licence to avoid IHT, they advised their super-rich clients to buy land and take advantage of it. In the 20 years to 2012, the price of farmland increased fourfold.
This turned landowning farmers into millionaires but — especially since land represents a cost of production — did no good to the incomes of food producers. It created impoverished millionaires who claimed a need for more support. At the same time, because more expensive land had to be squeezed even harder for the last drop of revenue, the environmental damage caused by intensive agriculture was made worse. Taking at least some of this tax loophole away will do no harm to family farmers but will help both public revenues and the environment.
Just a shame the relief was not wholly abolished.
Advertisement
Paul Cheshire Emeritus Professor of Economic Geography London School of Economics, London N7, UK
Robert Lighthizer suggests that to reduce the trade deficit the US could impose a system of import-export certificates (Opinion, FT.com, Nov 1), legislate for a capital access fee on inbound investment, and use broad-based tariffs to offset the unfair industrial policies of rival states.
But this would ultimately harm US workers and threaten global financial stability and growth. Foreign countries would undoubtedly retaliate, and the cost of capital in the US would rise. He conveniently ignores a simple-to-implement measure which, by the logic of national income accounting, would help to reduce the trade deficit: an increase in federal taxes.
George Hoguet Chief Executive, Chesham Investments, Brookline, MA, US Former Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for International Affairs
I was relieved to read the article by Amy Borrett entitled “Hard times mean Gen Z finds life tougher than previous generations” (Report, November 5). It highlighted some very real challenges faced by this cohort that is now entering the workforce. And to be honest, more often than not, I am left feeling frustrated on their behalf at the negative narratives that can surround them.
From my own experience working with multiple generations, I have observed Gen Z coming into the workplace carrying genuine concerns about the pressures to reach certain financial milestones and the world around them. It weighs heavy on them.
Our own data has told us that among 18- to 24-year-olds, seven in 10 are worried about how long it will take them to earn a salary that enables them to get on the property ladder. Six in 10 are worried that they will be behind their parents in reaching those milestones.
But we also found a generation that is driven to succeed and accelerate their careers because of this. And I see examples of this every day.
Advertisement
Being a millennial myself, I of course suffered from several preconceptions about what I would be like to work with and what I would bring to a workplace. It happens with every generation.
But when we look at the world around us right now, perhaps we should be acknowledging there is a lot that is unique about what Gen Z is experiencing and tackling that we did not face.
Bee Patel Director of Marketing, AlphaSights London EC4, UK
Singapore Airlines is revolutionising luxury travel with the introduction of a four-seat first class on its Airbus A350-900 ultra-long-range aircraft. This bold move targets high-spending travellers on long-haul flights, including the 17-hour journey from New York to Singapore.
You must be logged in to post a comment Login