Connect with us

Business

Kaput by Wolfgang Münchau — Germany’s great decline

Published

on

The German car industry has long been seen as a metaphor for the state of Europe’s largest economy. The recent announcement by Volkswagen, the country’s biggest carmaker, that it plans to close plants and lay-off workers, has quickly become a symbol of Germany’s current political and economic malaise — and its ever dimming future.

Volkswagen — founded by the Nazis, later a symbol of Germany’s postwar economic miracle — is no stranger to scandal and strategic mis-steps. Its corporate misbehaviour, manipulating exhaust data in the diesel scandal, and then its shortsighted neglect of electric cars, now provides a case study of how everything German messed up. The German legend has become a German albatross.

The car industry plays a central role in Kaput, Wolfgang Münchau’s eloquent and comprehensive deconstruction of the German model. “I am not peddling a conspiracy theory when I say that the car industry is running Germany,” is his dramatic verdict on the impact of the automobile. And, “when the industry starts to decline, so will the country.”

As if on cue, since the book went to press, Intel’s plan to build a semiconductor facility, in eastern Magdeburg, subsidised by the German taxpayer to the tune of €10bn, stalled because it involved building the wrong kind of semiconductor. In the western Saarland, a semiconductor factory planned by Wolfspeed and the German automotive supplier ZF has also been postponed. Now the German export economy faces a renewed onslaught from a second Trump administration, and the government too is tearing itself apart with disputes about the right economic response. The bad news keeps on coming.

Advertisement

Münchau, a former FT columnist, paints a picture of an economy, political system, and society dysfunctional to the point of being terminally broken, ie kaput. Germany faces a choice, but is unable to summon the political and intellectual resources to make any decisive response.

This extends beyond the boardroom and factory floor. After Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine shook all the assumptions of the old German foreign policy, Chancellor Olaf Scholz announced a complete rethink of his country’s basic model to suit a new age of geopolitics. It was, Scholz proclaimed, a Zeitenwende, or epochal turning point. Münchau is rightly sceptical and sees that as mostly rhetorical, smoke and mirrors.

His tale is entertainingly interspersed with personal stories of inadequacies, from poor or absent mobile telephony capacity, the anti-technical bias of school education (and more generally of German culture), the lagging universities, the unwieldiness of public bureaucracy, and a poor capacity to make use of the resources and skills brought by immigrants.

Münchau starts with “dodgy banks,” including another German icon, Deutsche Bank, but also the once powerful state-owned banks (“a slush fund to circumvent taxpayers”), then takes an automobile drive (taking in along the way “friends of Gerhard”, a clique of business pals of the former chancellor), before excoriating economic appeasement of Russia and China. Angela Merkel’s neo-mercantilism, when German exports “took off like never before,” provided an export vent to compensate for low investment during her 16-year chancellorship. The notorious debt-brake that limited public expenditure, including investment, has now become the cause of the collapse of the coalition government.

Advertisement

Although Schröder is lacerated, and Merkel mocked, no political figure emerges unscathed from Münchau’s diagnosis of a truly systemic problem. Thus “Neo-mercantilism is not a policy. It is a system. And everyone in Germany was supporting it.” Economic interests shaped the political culture, and no political party escaped, or could escape.

The two major political parties, the Christian Democrats and the Social Democrats, are equally guilty. The small, liberal Free Democratic party is obsessed with a fiscal rule that restricts public investment. Meanwhile, the Greens drove a senseless push to exit clean atomic energy that left Germany more dependent on carbon energy and on dirty coal. Nobody questioned the basic industrial model.

And Germany, Münchau argues, is ruining the EU. At the moment when Mario Draghi, the former ECB head, produced an important report on European competitiveness that emphasised, as does Münchau, the need for a capital markets union, Berlin pushed back ferociously against the attempt of the Italian bank UniCredit trying to take over Germany’s second-largest lender, Commerzbank. A new German hostility to technology is poisoning EU strategy, notably in AI regulation, where the EU is “delusional to think of itself as a global regulator in an area in which it has no experience”.   

Advertisement

What an indictment! Yet Germany was once a model, in the 19th century when it dominated scientific and industrial advance, but also recently when a commitment to workers’ rights and job security looked more appealing than the ruthless US version of capitalism. In the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, John Kampfner’s Why the Germans Do It Better (2020) gave us an overly rosy analysis of how the postwar wunderkind had grown into a mature country, with a harmonious corporate model, good labour relations, an appreciation of leisure and a high degree of tolerance. That was only a few years ago, but now everything appears changed.

What has gone wrong has an economic root, but is above all the product of a long-term political culture. The economic cause is the same story as the past triumphs when a focus on high-quality engineering was exemplified by the automobile. Improvements occurred through incremental tweaks, not through radical rethinking. There was no Schumpeterian creative destruction.

Not all the German story is as bleak as Münchau suggests. Is terrible industrial devastation always needed for rebirth and new development, or does incrementalism have some role? An often reported story, not presented by Münchau, takes the case of BioNTech’s miracle mRNA vaccine that is now being applied to the treatment of common cancers. BioNTech’s entrepreneurs were Uğur Şahin, born in Turkey, whose father came to Germany to work in the Ford automobile works, and his wife Özlem Türeci, born in Germany, to a surgeon of Turkish origin.

Despite the rise of the radical right Alternative for Germany party, which is not likely ever to be in power at the federal level, and notwithstanding horrifying incidents of political violence, most of Germany is still a civilised and decent place to live. There are still areas of scientific excellence; and also areas where immigrants play a transformative role. 

It is also difficult to imagine a large advanced industrial country that might serve as a better model. Britain or the US, with deeply dysfunctional politics? The Volkswagen story has a neat parallel in the travails of the American icon Boeing.

Advertisement

And ultimately, what will happen to Germany? The model of focusing on powerful export industries is German, but as Münchau acknowledges not uniquely so. This is the story of Japan, but also of modern China, and China is becoming the testing ground for the German model. China is replacing Germany, as the world’s manufacturing and export dynamo, because it was able to leapfrog to new technologies, notably in electric vehicles. There is also political capture there, leading to a neglect of new technologies.

What happens when the growth models collapse? Japan after the bubble burst in the 1990s, with an ever more striking ageing problem, had very slow growth, but no political or social, let alone a civilisational collapse. It still plays an important foreign policy role, and it still leads in some areas of design. Maturing is not the same thing as sudden death. A future Münchau may write a parallel analysis of Chinese stagnation, where the political fallout is likely to be much more destructive. The EU provides a protective framework for a broken wunderkind, and there is dynamism elsewhere, notably to the north and to the east, where the likes of Denmark and Poland have become the new economic exemplar.

Kaput: The End of the German Miracle by Wolfgang Münchau Swift Press £20, 256 pages

Advertisement

Harold James is the author of ‘Seven Crashes: The Economic Crises That Shaped Globalization’

Join our online book group on Facebook at FT Books Café and subscribe to our podcast Life and Art wherever you listen

  

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Business

Was the Polymarket Trump whale smart or lucky?

Published

on

Unlock the White House Watch newsletter for free

The Wall Street Journal today has an interview with “Théo”, the mystery prediction-market trader who says he’ll make nearly $50mn on Polymarket by betting on Donald Trump winning the US presidency.

It offers some interesting new information about his apparent edge:

Advertisement

Théo argued that pollsters should use what are known as neighbor polls that ask respondents which candidates they expect their neighbors to support. The idea is that people might not want to reveal their own preferences, but will indirectly reveal them when asked to guess who their neighbors plan to vote for.

Théo cited a handful of publicly released polls conducted in September using the neighbor method alongside the traditional method. These polls showed Harris’s support was several percentage points lower when respondents were asked who their neighbors would vote for, compared with the result that came from directly asking which candidate they supported. 

To Théo, this was evidence that pollsters were—once again—underestimating Trump’s support. The data helped convince him to put on his long-shot bet that Trump would win the popular vote. At the time that Théo made those wagers, bettors on Polymarket were assessing the chances of a Trump popular-vote victory at less than 40%.

As Théo celebrated the returns on Election Night, he disclosed another piece of the analysis behind his successful wager. In an email, he told the Journal that he had commissioned his own surveys to measure the neighbor effect, using a major pollster whom he declined to name. The results, he wrote, “were mind blowing to the favor of Trump!” 

Théo declined to share those surveys, saying his agreement with the pollster required him to keep the results private. But he argued that U.S. pollsters should use the neighbor method in future surveys to avoid another embarrassing miss.

Advertisement

“Public opinion would have been better prepared if the latest polls had measured that neighbor effect,” Théo said.

Théo’s hunch has been proved right, but does the methodology stack up? According to the experts, it’s impossible to know.

“Unless the evidence is put into the public domain with tables (often missing for many US polls) it is frankly impossible to comment,” Sir John Curtice, professor of politics at Strathclyde University, told FTAV.

Though only a few papers have been published that test the accuracy of so-called nominative opinion polls, the wisdom of crowds remains an active area of research. James Surowiecki’s 2004 pop-sociology bestseller of the same name sets out the argument that decentralised groups of independent, diverse thinkers can provide unbiased estimates of reality. More recent work — such as this paper from Roni Lehrer, Sebastian Juhl and Thomas Gschwend of Mannheim University — has applied to elections the principle that crowds are fairly good at guessing what “share of the population has [a] socially undesirable characteristic”.

Advertisement

Building on the theme is Predicting Elections: a ‘Wisdom of Crowds’ Approach by Martin Boon, co-founder of Deltapoll. His study concludes that while know-thy-neighbour polling can be more accurate than conventional surveys, the method is “more than capable of producing seriously misleading predictions”.

Crowd-wisdom polling outperformed the best conventional poll for the UK 2010 general election, Boon finds, but was a notably poor predictor when applied to the outcomes of the 2011 Welsh referendums on devolution powers and voting reform.

Wisdom polls struggle when a high proportion of the electorate doesn’t understand the question, he suggests:

When our general election prediction proved accurate, most people had the advantage of both a basic understanding of British politics at general election time, and a prompted understanding of how each party had fared at the previous election. In short, they had enough information to be smart. However, this may not have been the case in the referenda; both were characterised by the electorate’s limited understanding.

Making people take a view about whether the public would prefer proportional representation to first-past-the-post delivered superficial answers that grouped like a coin flip around the median point of 50 per cent, Boon finds. Their predictive powers improved in all cases when given information around which to frame an answer, such as the result of a previous vote, the trade-off being that prompted questions introduce potential biases. And even then, given a difficult question, voting-intention polling methods still won out.

Advertisement

How informed and engaged the US electorate was in this year’s presidential election is being explored at length elsewhere, as is the possibility that systematic biases skewed conventional polls. Whether one trader’s private polling tapped sentiment more accurately than the publicly available surveys, or whether statistical noise just happened to reinforce his confidence to buy a dollar for 40c, can’t be known without seeing the data.

Whichever way, the bet on Trump winning the popular vote was not quite as contrarian as the risk-and-reward of a binary market makes it appear. “A 40 per cent chance is quite high!” said Curtice:

In any event the polls were not far off. [They] probably underestimated Trump relative to Harris by 4 points and by less than that in most of the swing states. Nobody would have noticed such errors if the election had not been as close as it was.

That’s not to deny that the polls still have a bit of a problem estimating Trump — but finding the source of an error as small as the one this time around will not be easy.

Further reading:
Take political betting markets literally, not seriously (FTAV)

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Money

Halifax reports house prices hit record high in October

Published

on

Halifax reports house prices hit record high in October

House prices increased by 0.2% in October, the fourth monthly increase in a row, the report found.

The post Halifax reports house prices hit record high in October appeared first on Property Week.

Source link

Continue Reading

Business

The fight for the future of chips

Published

on

There’s a battle going on for control of the global semiconductor industry – the chips that are in virtually every piece of electronics we use from our phones to our cars to the latest AI software. For the past half century, chips have quietly powered the technological revolution. In this series, James Kynge goes deep into the miracle of modern chip manufacturing and the struggle over who commands its future.

Presented by James Kynge. Edwin Lane is the senior producer. The producer is Josh Gabert-Doyon. Executive producer is Manuela Saragosa. Sound design by Breen Turner and Samantha Giovinco, with original music from Metaphor Music. The FT’s head of audio is Cheryl Brumley. Special thanks to Tim Bradshaw.

View our accessibility guide.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Money

A Guide to Finding The Best Investment Properties for Sale in UAE (2025) – Finance Monthly

Published

on

What is the Average Credit Score in the UK

UAE is undoubtedly one of the best places to find properties with the highest return on investment. Over the years, things have become really investor-friendly. In 2023, the country saw a massive boost in foreign direct investment, reaching $30.69 billion, which marks a 34.97% increase from the previous year. This upward trend underscores the growing confidence in the market, showcasing why finding the best investment properties for sale in UAE remains a lucrative opportunity for investors.

But what makes a property an attractive investment opportunity in UAE? And what are some of the top investment properties currently available in the country? Let’s dive in and guide you through finding the best investment properties in UAE that will bring you high returns in 2025 and beyond.

Signs of the Best Investment Properties for Sale in UAE

Here are some key signs to look out for when searching for the best investment properties for sale in UAE:

Location

Location is the most important factor when hunting for top investment properties in the UAE. But with so many options available, how do you choose the best location? Well, if it’s your first time, then we’ll recommend Dubai Marina. It is a stunning residential area known for its calming vibe, glamorous lifestyle, and towering skyscrapers. Called “The Tallest Block in the World,” Dubai Marina offers amazing marina views with various properties, from high-rise apartments to luxurious hotels.

Advertisement

Then, there’s Downtown Dubai, filled with energy and home to the iconic Burj Khalifa. Here, property choices range from cozy studios to spacious 5-bed townhouses. Prices for these high-end apartments start from AED 3,570,373. Downtown Dubai is perfect for those who want easy access to shopping malls, schools, and great entertainment like the Dubai Mall and Dubai Fountain.

And don’t forget about Palm Jumeirah, a jaw-dropping man-made island shaped like a palm tree. This fascinating island offers everything you need, from fun leisure activities to delightful dining options and pristine private beaches. If you invest in a property here, expect to get a very high rental return, especially during peak tourist seasons.

Infrastructure Development

The UAE’s property market has flourished in the last few years, driven by strategic investments and supportive government policies. The increase in foreign direct investment is living proof of the confidence investors have in this ever-evolving landscape. Key to this growth is the solid infrastructure development across the nation. 

The Ministry of Energy and Infrastructure has implemented 129 development projects worth approximately AED 11.8 billion as part of the ministry’s five-year plan (2018-2023). This extensive development has increased demand for properties, making UAE one of the hottest investment spots globally.

Advertisement

Market Trends

Staying updated with the latest market trends is crucial when searching for top investment properties in UAE. One noteworthy trend is the growing popularity of off-plan properties or projects that are still under construction. These offer attractive payment plans and flexible options, making them a preferred choice for many investors. In 2023 alone, Dubai recorded 57,360 off-plan property transactions, a 48% increase from 2022. The success of these off-plan projects shows a promising future for investors looking for high returns.

Rental Yields

When it comes to rental yields, the UAE is shining bright! In the first quarter of 2024, the average gross rental yield was 5.16%, which is an amazing increase from 4.93% in the third quarter of 2023. This rise shows how strong and exciting the property market is becoming in the UAE. For investors, such high rental yields mean more money in their pockets. It’s like getting a bigger piece of a delicious pie! So, if you’re looking to invest, the UAE is the place to be for exciting rental returns.

3 Best Investment Properties for Sale in UAE

Now that you know what makes a property an attractive investment opportunity and the key signs to look out for, let’s take a look at the 3 best investment properties for sale in UAE.

Number 1. Apartment in TIGER SKY TOWER

How wonderful would it be to start your day in a stunning 2-bedroom apartment located right in the bustling heart of Dubai’s Business Bay? Welcome to the TIGER SKY TOWER. With its generous 144.87 square meters of living space, this apartment is designed for comfort and relaxation.

Advertisement

You will have two elegant bathrooms to complement the luxurious living space, and being just 450 meters from the sea, the location couldn’t be more ideal for those who love the ocean breeze. Priced at 4 771 665 AED, this property not only provides you with modern living but also great value, situated close to Dubai’s vibrant city centre.

Number 2. Apartment in Beach Walk

Imagine living in a cozy apartment in the beautiful Beach Walk area of Dubai. This fabulous place features 2 bedrooms and 2 bathrooms, offering a comfortable living space of 93 square meters. It’s close to the sea, just 350 meters away, making it perfect for anyone who loves the beach.

The apartment is priced at 3,300,000 AED, giving you a chance to invest in a valuable property in a prime location in Dubai. If you invest in this property, you’ll also enjoy a range of amenities such as gymnasiums, restaurants and cafes, and breathtaking views of the surrounding area.

Number 3. Apartment in Beach Walk

Discover the stunning Apartment in Beach Walk, Dubai, UAE, a remarkable investment opportunity with elegant features and a prime location. This luxurious property contains 2 bedrooms and 2 bathrooms, providing a generous living space of 93 square meters. Strategically located just 350 meters away from the beautiful sea, this apartment offers both comfort and convenience.

Advertisement

With its exquisite design and access to various amenities, this property promises a harmonious lifestyle in one of Dubai’s sought-after areas. Priced at 3,300,000 AED, it represents an exceptional investment potential.

Conclusion

So, there you have it! A complete guide to finding the best investment properties for sale in UAE. Who doesn’t want to invest in a booming real estate market that offers high rental yields, incredible infrastructure development, and a wide range of property options? Be it the luxurious Palm Jumeirah or the lively Downtown Dubai, you just can’t go wrong with any investment in the UAE. Happy investing!

Want to know more? Visit https://emirates.estate/.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Travel

Protection of Human Rights Against Violations of Religious Freedom

Published

on

Protection of Human Rights Against Violations of Religious Freedom

South Korean local government cancels international event with 30,000 participants from 78 countries, causing international damage.

On 29 October, an administrative decision by a South Korean government agency triggered international controversy, raising concerns over religious freedom and resulting in considerable financial loss.

The “Religious Leaders Forum and Graduation Ceremony,” a joint initiative by two prominent religious organisations, was scheduled to take place in Paju, South Korea. The event was anticipated to attract over 30,000 participants from 57 countries, including 1,000 religious leaders representing Christianity, Buddhism, Islam, and Hinduism.

However, the Gyeonggi Tourism Organisation, a public entity under Gyeonggi Province, abruptly cancelled the venue rental without prior notice. This last-minute decision has led to significant financial damage for the international event. Organisers of the event stated that the cancellation constitutes an unconstitutional act of discrimination against a particular religion, violating religious freedom, human rights, and due process of law.

Advertisement

The hosting organisations, the Association for Buddhist National Unification of Korea and the Shincheonji Church of Jesus, reported that they had received official confirmation on 23 and 28 October that there was no plan to cancel. They also claimed that the unilateral cancellation was an unreasonable administrative action targeting a specific religious group. They further emphasised that other events scheduled for the same day were unaffected, suggesting that the cancellation was “an administrative decision influenced by opposition from a specific religious group,” which “violates the principle of separation of church and state guaranteed by the Constitution.”

The Gyeonggi Tourism Organisation cited security concerns related to recent North Korean actions and the planned activities of a North Korean defector group as reasons for the cancellation. However, it was noted that other events, such as civilian bike rides and foreign tourist visits to the DMZ, were allowed within the same designated area.

The incident has reignited international debate about religious freedom and tolerance in South Korea. The U.S. State Department’s International Religious Freedom Report has previously raised concerns such as the prosecution of the Shincheonji Church of Jesus and the government’s refusal to approve the construction of a mosque.

The Association for Buddhist National Unification of Korea and the Shincheonji Church of Jesus are calling on the South Korean government to respect religious freedom, uphold human rights, and reverse this unjust decision. They urge international organisations to monitor the situation and take appropriate action to protect religious freedom.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Business

A Russian reprieve for JPMorgan?

Published

on

Line chart of Share price, pence showing JEMA jumped after Trump's win

Stay informed with free updates

Yesterday, we wrote about how Donald Trump’s resounding election victory sparked a rally in Russia’s Moex index, Austria’s heavily Russia-exposed Raiffeisen Bank International and various other Russia-linked assets.  

We missed a biggie — on Monday, JPMorgan’s Emerging Europe, Middle East and Africa Securities (JEMA) had jumped 18.3 per cent, its biggest daily rise in over two years.

Advertisement

Until 2022, the London-listed investment fund went by a slightly snappier name: JPMorgan Russian Securities.

Line chart of Share price, pence showing JEMA jumped after Trump's win

JEMA describes itself in marketing materials as a high-quality, dividend-focused equity fund. Launched in 1994, it was one of the first ever to invest in Russia’s then-newly-open market, and has been run by JPM’s Oleg Biryulyov ever since. 

Obviously everything changed for the fund after Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. And, perhaps, it’s important to take a longer view:

Line chart of Share price, pence showing Zoom out, however....

The eventual closure of the Russian market to Western investors meant the valuation of the 26 stocks JEMA held in Russia were marked down to nominal levels, with sanctions having trashed their valuations. One of JEMA’s Ukrainian directors stepped down shortly after the outbreak of war. 

JEMA remains a good way to play the prospect of Russia getting de-sanctioned, however.

Months after the invasion, the fund’s board swapped its original benchmark (Russia’s RTS Index) for the S&P EMEA BMI (ticker: SPEMAUT), which covers “stocks from developed and emerging markets in Europe, the Middle East and Africa”. On Monday, that index barely budged.

Advertisement

JEMA’s Russian securities now comprise roughly eight per cent of the net asset value of its portfolio. Lukoil and Gazprom remain two of JEMA’s top-five overweights. 

In the six months to last April, JEMA’s net asset value rose 6.9 per cent, marginally underperforming its new reference index. Chair Eric Sanderson blamed this on “high ongoing charges and its holding of Russian assets, which do not form part of the reference index”.

Post-tax revenue over the same period fell to £41,000. In the six months to April 2021, revenue was £4.3mn. At pixel time, the fund’s market cap stood just under $60mn.

“Separate and distinct” from JEMA’s market cap, as Grant’s Interest Rate Observer noted in August, “is £25.2mn in accumulated Russian dividends (with another £7.9mn expected), undistributed since the war began” and held in a custody ‘S’ account in Moscow.

Advertisement

Per Grant’s:

Whether the JEMA shareholders or Vladimir Putin will wind up pocketing the money is a good question. Decree No. 442, signed by the president of Russia on May 23, authorizes retaliatory compensation for Western seizures of Russian assets. Surely, if push came to shove, Putin would not overlook the JEMA dividend pile.

[ . . . ]

Accounting for the aforementioned writedown of Russian assets, JEMA’s NAV per share stands at £0.50. However, if one were to replace the marked-down value with current market value, the picture would instantly brighten — it could, in fact, dazzle. NAV per share would soar by 813% to £4.54.

In April, to complicate matters further, VTB Bank, one of Russia’s largest state lenders — and one of JEMA’s holdings — filed a lawsuit in Russia against nine JPMorgan legal entities, seeking to recover $493.5mn held with the US bank in New York. JPMorgan has challenged VTB’s claims.

Advertisement

On October 18, per a JEMA filing to the LSE, the Russian court granted VTB’s claim for $439mn in full against eight (including JEMA) of the nine JPMorgan entities named as defendants in the original claim.

The JPMorgan defendants have 30 days from the date of publication of the ruling to appeal. Under current Russian law, JEMA’s ‘S’ account assets cannot be used to satisfy the judgment. 

Has Trump’s election victory shifted the dial on any of this? Judging by JEMA’s share price jump on Monday, some investors seem to think the answer may be “yes”.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 WordupNews.com