Edge-lit LEDs appear to develop visible problems very early
Problems are particularly obvious with larger-sized displays
Shop around for discounts on better-quality panels
Late last year, we published a warning for Black Friday TV buyers: avoid big TVs with cheap edge-lit panels. The main reason was the visual quality, as edge-lit panels aren’t great for big sizes. But a new report suggests another reason you should steer clear. Big edge-lit panels appear to fail more quickly than other types of TV displays.
That’s according to Rtings’ ongoing TV longevity tests, as reported by FlatpanelsHD.com. The tests feature 100 different TVs from multiple brands and with multiple technologies – edge-LED, direct LED, full array local dimming, and OLED – and the results for edge-LED aren’t great.
What’s the problem with edge-lit panels?
There are multiple problems, though. First, they don’t generally deliver great uniformity in how they light up the display. That’s because their backlight is usually positioned at the bottom with a diffuser film to spread the light over the panel. The bigger the panel, the more obvious the design’s shortcomings become.
According to Rtings, over 25% of the LCD TVs they tested exhibited visible light uniformity issues. But among edge-LED LCD TVs, that figure rocketed to 64% – so you’ve got a one in three chance of getting a TV with consistent lighting.
To be fair, the number of sets affected is small: seven out of 100 TVs. However, three of those seven started showing problems before or after 2,200 hours of testing. That’s the equivalent of one year’s viewing in the typical US household.
Advertisement
According to Rtings, the results of their tests demonstrate that “edge-lit TVs are inherently prone to significant durability issues, including warped reflector sheets, cracked light guide plates, and burnt-out LEDs due to concentrated heat.”
That’s the bad news. But the good news is that with Black Friday nearly here, you won’t necessarily have to plump for edge-lit if you want a nice big TV that fits your budget: this is, of course, one of the best times to buy a new TV because they’re a big part of every Black Friday, and even high-spec models such as LG’s C4 OLED get big discounts.
Sign up to be the first to know about unmissable Black Friday deals on top tech, plus get all your favorite TechRadar content.
ByteDance’s new AI tool, X-Portrait 2, transforms still photos into realistic video animations of famous movie scenes with uncanny detail, raising questions about the future of AI-driven animation and digital content creation.Read More
Apple is showing some love to Android users by finally displaying their message reactions correctly. Now when an Android user reacts to an RCS message from an iOS user, the selected emoji will appear in line with the message bubble on iOS — instead of archaically appearing as a separate line like this: “💀 to ‘that wasn’t supposed to happen.’”
The Verge sent test messages and emoji reactions between iPhones running iOS 18.1 and different Android phones, confirming both devices now display reactions as intended. It’s unclear when this change happened or whose side — Google or Apple — had to make adjustments to get it working.
When RCS first launched widely on iOS in September, message reactions from Android users still weren’t being displayed correctly on the iPhone, even though they worked the other way around. We reached out to both companies for comment but did not hear back before publication.
Us casually discovering that message reactions work correctly now.Screenshot: The Verge
Advertisement
Apple’s quiet improvement to RCS messages comes as a surprise. Apple for years ignored Google’s campaign to get the company to adopt the standard, ultimately complying only after a mix of pressure in both China and the EU. Basic support for RCS was included in iOS 18.
Within the Messages app, Apple officially supports the basic RCS standard known as the RCS Universal Profile. Emoji reaction support is part of RCS version 2.7, which should also include the ability to edit a sent message — but we could not make that work on iOS. Of course, Apple will keep as many exclusive features as possible for its blue bubble iMessage service, at least as long it isn’t forced to change.
Strands is the NYT’s latest word game after the likes of Wordle, Spelling Bee and Connections – and it’s great fun. It can be difficult, though, so read on for my Strands hints.
SPOILER WARNING: Information about NYT Strands today is below, so don’t read on if you don’t want to know the answers.
Your Strands expert
Advertisement
Your Strands expert
Marc McLaren
NYT Strands today (game #250) – hint #1 – today’s theme
What is the theme of today’s NYT Strands?
• Today’s NYT Strands theme is… 👋👏🤝🤏✌️☝️✊🙏
NYT Strands today (game #250) – hint #2 – clue words
Play any of these words to unlock the in-game hints system.
Advertisement
NYT Strands today (game #250) – hint #3 – spangram
What is a hint for today’s spangram?
• Finger talking
NYT Strands today (game #250) – hint #4 – spangram position
What are two sides of the board that today’s spangram touches?
First: right, 4th row
Last: left, 6th row
Right, the answers are below, so DO NOT SCROLL ANY FURTHER IF YOU DON’T WANT TO SEE THEM.
Advertisement
NYT Strands today (game #250) – the answers
The answers to today’s Strands, game #250, are…
SHAKE
WAVE
CLAP
PRAY
PINCH
FIST
POINT
PEACE
SPANGRAM: HANDGESTURES
My rating: Easy (but pointless)
My score: Perfect
It seems a shame that the NYT didn’t mark the 250th Strands game with a better, more interesting puzzle than this, but here we are. Today’s game is essentially a case of ‘Say what you see’. All eight standard answers are shown in emoji form, with only the spangram to work out on your own. So you get the likes of POINT, PRAY, WAVE and CLAP, plus the spangram HANDGESTURES to describe them all. The only remotely difficult answer was PINCH, which was a rare ‘crossover’ answer, where the letters formed a knot. It was all a bit of a waste, really, with no brain power required.
Sign up to be the first to know about unmissable Black Friday deals on top tech, plus get all your favorite TechRadar content.
Yesterday’s NYT Strands answers (Thursday, 7 November, game #249)
TWEET
POST
SHARE
LIKE
FOLLOW
COMMENT
REPORT
SPANGRAM: SOCIALMEDIA
What is NYT Strands?
Strands is the NYT’s new word game, following Wordle and Connections. It’s now out of beta so is a fully fledged member of the NYT’s games stable and can be played on the NYT Games site on desktop or mobile.
I’ve got a full guide to how to play NYT Strands, complete with tips for solving it, so check that out if you’re struggling to beat it each day.
NASA astronaut Don Pettit already has a long-held reputation for creating stunning space photography, and his latest effort will only bolster it.
Shared on social media on Thursday, the image (top) shows Earth as a blaze of streaking light, an effect created by using a long and multiple exposures to capture cities at night across several continents.
But the photograph, captured from the International Space Station (ISS) where Pettit arrived in September on his fourth orbital mission, also features lots of other goodies, including perhaps the first ISS image to show both a sunset and sunrise in a single frame. Circular star trails above Earth are also visible, and if you look closely enough you might also be able to see lightning flashes and aurora.
New star trails photography is back!
This 30-minute time exposure through orbital night with our new 15mm wide-angle lens was able to capture sunset (on the left) all the way to sunrise (on the right). I have never been able to capture this before but our new fast (14mm f1.4 and… pic.twitter.com/H6uV9GGEK1
“This 30-minute time exposure through orbital night with our new 15mm wide-angle lens was able to capture sunset (on the left) all the way to sunrise (on the right),” Pettit, at 69 NASA’s oldest serving astronaut, wrote in a post on social media. “I have never been able to capture this before but our new fast (14mm f1.4 and 15mm T1.8) wide-angle lenses are opening up observations previously not possible.”
Pettit added: “Visible are circular star trails above the earth limb created not from Earth rotation but from our orbital motion (pitch axis of ISS), cities streaking by (again due to orbital motion), lightning flashes, aurora, [and] atmospheric airglow (both strong green and fainter red).”
The American astronaut used a powerful Nikon Z9 camera with an Arri-Zeiss 15mm T1.8 master prime lens to capture the image, opening the shutter for 30 seconds at T1.8 for individual exposures that were assembled using Photoshop into a composite equivalent to a 30-minute exposure.
Advertisement
Pettit hit the headlines shortly after arriving at the ISS last month after capturing a remarkable image showing the Polaris Dawn crew heading back to Earth at high speed aboard a SpaceX Crew Dragon spacecraft at the end of a history-making mission. He also recently shared some sublime shots that look more like works of art than photos of Earth.
This time around we’ll be comparing two foldable smartphones, one from Google, and one from HONOR. These are the best foldables these two companies have to offer, and they launched a couple of months ago. This is a comparison between the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs HONOR Magic V3. Both of these smartphones have their upsides, but they’re vastly different despite the fact they’re both book-style foldables.
The two companies took completely different approaches here. The HONOR Magic V3 is actually the thinnest and lightest book-style foldable on the market. The Pixel 9 Pro Fold has some catching up to do in that department. In any case, we’ll first list their specifications, and then we’ll move to compare them across a number of different categories. With that being said, let’s get down to it.
Specs
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold & HONOR Magic V3, respectively
– Screen size (main): 8-inch Foldable LTPO OLED display (120Hz, HDR10+, 2,700 nits) 7.92-inch Foldable LTPO AMOLED (120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 1,800 nits) – Screen Size (cover): 6.3-inch OLED (120Hz, 2,700 nits) 6.43-inch LTPO OLED (120Hz, 5,000 nits) – Display resolution (main): 2076 x 2152 2156 x 2344 – Display resolution (cover): 2424 x 1080 2376 x 1060 – SoC: Google Tensor G4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 – RAM: 16GB (LPDDR5X) 12GB/16GB (LPDDR5X) – Storage: 256GB/512GB (UFS 3.1) 256GB/512GB/1TB (UFS 4.0) – Rear cameras: 48MP (wide, f/1.7 aperture, OIS), 10.8MP (ultrawide, 127-degree FoV), 10.5MP (telephoto, 5x optical zoom, OIS) 50MP (wide, f/1.6 aperture, 1/1.56-inch sensor size, OIS, PDAF), 40MP (ultrawide, f/2.2 aperture, 112-degree FoV), 50MP (periscope telephoto, 1/2.51-inch sensor size, OIS, 3.5x optical zoom) – Front cameras: 10MP (main display, f/2.2 aperture), 10MP (cover display, f/2.2 aperture) 20MP (main display, f/2.2 aperture), 32MP (cover display, f/2.4 aperture) – Battery: 4,650mAh 5,150mAh – Charging: 21W wired, 7.5W wireless (no charger) 66W wired, 50W wireless, 5W reverse wired (charger included) – Dimensions (unfolded): 155.2 x 150.2 x 5.1 mm 156.6 x 145.3 x 4.35 mm or 4.4 mm – Dimensions (folded): 155.2 x 77.1 x 10.5 mm 156.6 x 74.0 x 9.2 mm or 9.3 mm – Weight: 257 grams 226/230 grams – Connectivity: 5G, LTE, NFC, Wi-Fi, USB Type-C, Bluetooth 5.3 – Security: Side-facing fingerprint scanner – OS: Android 14 Android 14 with MagicOS 8.0.1 – Price: $1,799+ €1,999 – Buy: Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Best Buy) HONOR Magic V3 (HONOR)
Advertisement
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs HONOR Magic V3: Design
Both of these smartphones are made out of metal and glass. The Magic V3 does come in a variant with a vegan leather backplate too, though. The Pixel 9 Pro Fold’s design seems like it was inspired by the OnePlus Open, at least to a degree. It is flat on the front and back, and even its sides are flat. The HONOR Magic V3’s back is mostly flat, but it has rounded corners. The phone kind of curves into the sides a bit, which makes it feel even thinner.
Speaking of which, the HONOR Magic V3 is noticeably thinner and lighter than the Pixel 9 Pro Fold. It measures 4.35-4.4mm when unfolded (depending on the variant), and 9.2-9.3mm when unfolded. The Pixel 9 Pro Fold measures 5.1mm when unfolded, and 10.5mm when folded. HONOR’s smartphone weighs 226 or 230 grams, while the Pixel 9 Pro Fold weighs 257 grams. The difference in weight is especially pronounced, but you’ll feel both the added weight and thickness in comparison.
The HONOR Magic V3 is slightly taller and considerably narrower than the Pixel 9 Pro Fold. HONOR’s phone has a larger cover display and a slightly smaller main display. Both phones have a display camera hole on both their cover displays and main displays. The location on the main displays is different, though. Their rear camera islands are also different. The Pixel 9 Pro Fold’s is pill-shaped and horizontal. The HONOR Magic V3 has a camera oreo on the back, which is centered.
Both devices also come with an IPX8 certification for water resistance. The HONOR Magic V3 also supports a stylus, unlike the Pixel 9 Pro Fold. These are two completely different approaches to design. The HONOR Magic V3 does feel a lot more like a regular phone when folded, though.
Advertisement
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs HONOR Magic V3: Display
The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold has an 8-inch Foldable LTPO OLED main panel. That display offers a refresh rate of up to 120Hz (1-120Hz), and it supports HDR10+ content. The peak brightness here is 2,700 nits. The display offers a 2076 x 2152 resolution. Its cover display measures 6.3 inches, and it’s an OLED panel. It offers a 120Hz refresh rate, and HDR content is supported. The Corning Gorilla Glass 2 protection is also a part of the package, while the resolution here is 2424 x 1080. The peak brightness is also 2,700 nits.
The HONOR Magic V3, on the flip side, has a 7.92-inch Foldable LTPO AMOLED main display. That panel can project up to 1 billion colors, and HDR10+ content is supported. Dolby Vision is also supported here, and the display offers an adaptive refresh rate of up to 120Hz (1-120Hz). The peak brightness here is 1,800 nits. The resolution it offers is 2156 x 2344. The cover display measures 6.43 inches, and it offers a resolution of 2376 x 1060. That is an LTPO OLED panel that can project up to 1 billion colors and offers an adaptive refresh rate of up to 120Hz (1-120Hz). Dolby Vision is also supported, and the peak brightness here is 5,000 nits. This display is protected by nanocrystal glass 2.0.
All four of these displays are great, actually. They’re vivid, have great viewing angles, and are more than sharp enough. They also get bright enough under all conditions, basically, even though there are some differences. It’s worth noting that the HONOR Magic V3 does have the advantage of having a less visible crease, even though Google did improve in that aspect compared to the Pixel Fold. The HONOR Magic V3’s main panel also supports a stylus input.
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs HONOR Magic V3: Performance
The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold is fueled by the Google Tensor G4 processor. The company also includes 16GB of LPDDR5X RAM here, and UFS 3.1 flash storage too. The HONOR Magic V3, on the flip side, is fueled by the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 processor. It includes up to 16GB of LPDDR5X RAM and UFS 4.0 flash storage. Do note that the storage is not expandable on either phone.
The Magic V3 does have a more powerful processor and faster storage. The Tensor G4 is not about sheer power, though, and it’s well-optimized to work with Pixel phones, it’s also a flagship chip. With that being said, both smartphones work really well on a day-to-day basis. Regular tasks are a piece of cake for both phones, and there’s no lag to talk about here, none at all. That may change over time, of course, and create some differences between the two phones. At the moment, however, you’ll be happy with the performance they both offer.
Advertisement
The HONOR Magic V3 does have the upper hand when it comes to gaming, though. It can play the most demanding titles from the Play Store without a problem, at the highest graphical settings. Games like Genshin Impact, for example. The Pixel 9 Pro Fold can do the same, but the experience is not as good. You’ll have to tone down the graphical settings a bit in order to get the very top performance. Any other game, however, that is not a top graphical title, will play great on either phone. Neither phone ended up overheating for us.
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs HONOR Magic V3: Battery
The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold includes a 4,650mAh battery. HONOR’s foldable, on the flip side, has a 5,150mAh battery on the inside. HONOR is using a silicon-carbon battery, unlike Google, which allowed the company to fit a lot more capacity in a smaller space. The thing is, however, the Pixel 9 Pro Fold did offer better battery life overall, at least during our testing. The difference was not huge, but still, it’s there. Google manages to pull out more battery juice from a smaller battery in this case.
Granted, getting to really high screen-on-time levels with both phones is possible. That will largely depend on your usage, but if you’re not utilizing processor-intensive tasks, such as gaming, getting over 7 hours of screen-on-time on both phones is possible. That will also depend on how much you use their main displays compared to cover displays, and many other factors. What I’m trying to say is, your mileage may vary. Both phones offered really, really good battery life during our usage.
When the charging is concerned, however, the HONOR Magic V3 completely destroys the Pixel 9 Pro Fold. Google’s handset supports 21W wired and 7.5W wireless charging. The HONOR Magic V3, on the other hand, supports 66W wired, 50W wireless, and 5W reverse wired charging. It charges much faster both via a wire and wirelessly, it’s not even close. It also comes with a charger in the box, which is not something we can say for the Pixel 9 Pro Fold.
Advertisement
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs HONOR Magic V3: Cameras
Both of these phones have three cameras on the back, but their setups are different. The Pixel 9 Pro Fold has a 48-megapixel main camera (1/2.0-inch sensor, OIS), a 10.5-megapixel ultrawide unit (127-degree FoV), and a 10.8-megapixel periscope telephoto camera (1/3.2-inch sensor, 5x optical zoom). The HONOR Magic V3 includes a 50-megapixel main camera (1/1.56-inch sensor, a 40-megapixel ultrawide unit (112-degree FoV), and a 50-megapixel periscope telephoto camera (1/2.51-inch sensor, 3.5x optical zoom).
The HONOR Magic V3 does have the advantage when it comes to camera hardware. Its sensor sizes are bigger, and that does show in the final results. If you take a closer look at the images, you’ll see the difference. The Pixel 9 Pro Fold is not on the same level as its Pixel 9 Pro and Pro XL flagships in terms of camera prowess, unfortunately. Google attempted to save space and this is what we got.
Don’t get me wrong, the pictures look great, but it’s also at the same time obvious that they’re not on the same level as the ones provided by its siblings, not even close. The HONOR Magic V3 did win this comparison for us. Overall it took better pictures, even though the Pixel 9 Pro XL did swing back at times. In low light the Magic V3 offered superior performance, even though Google’s image processing made sure that the Pixel 9 Pro Fold is not that far behind. Both phones offer vivid images, with emphasized colors. Neither is aiming to bee too realistic, as both phones are trying to make images look appealing via processing. Also, it’s worth noting that the Magic V3 offers a lot better camera performance than the Magic V2.
Audio
There are stereo speakers included on both of these phones. This is where the Pixel 9 Pro Fold has a huge advantage, actually. Its speakers are notably louder than the ones from the Magic V3, it’s not even close. The sound quality is good from both sets, but the Pixel 9 Pro Fold does have the edge in that regard too.
Advertisement
Neither hone comes with an audio jack, though. You can plug in your headphones into their Type-C ports if you need a wired connection, though. If not, Bluetooth 5.3 is on offer on both smartphones.
Voice assistants have a reputation for finicky activation, such as responding to their prompts that are spoken in an ad. Apple may have a fix for that in the works. 9to5Mac spotted this element in the tvOS 18.2 beta. A part of code called AdBlocker appears to use the Shazam API to match audio captured by a device’s microphones against audio fingerprints downloaded from Apple. When there’s a match, the usual Siri trigger command is disabled. In theory, this means Apple could have devices not react to the “Hey Siri” prompt when it’s spoken as part of the company’s keynote presentations or TV advertisements.
The publication only found this feature in the current developer beta of tvOS, which it suggests means that HomePod smart speaker will be the first device to potentially ignore those “Hey Siri” commands. However, iOS 18.2 is also in developer beta and is bringing more Apple Intelligence features to Apple’s smartphones, as well as possibly integrating ChatGPT subscriptions with Siri.
You must be logged in to post a comment Login