Connect with us

Politics

Mark Carney shows he’s an imperialist at heart

Published

on

Mark Carney shows he's an imperialist at heart

Mark Carney, prime minister of Canada, has put out a bullshit statement in support of the US and Israel’s strikes on Iran.

Of course, he completely fails to mention the illegality of the unprovoked strikes. Instead, he spouts bullshit about Iran’s instability and ‘terror’. More like, he’s a racist muppet who disapproves of black and brown people having free will and being able to live their lives away from imperialist control.

Carney is a liberal through and through

Canada’s position remains clear: the Islamic Republic of Iran is the principal source of instability and terror throughout the Middle East, has one of the world’s worst human rights records, and must never be allowed to obtain or develop nuclear weapons.

What he also failed to mention was that Iran was attending peace talks. Additionally, Netanyahu has been claiming Iran is ‘days away‘ from nuclear capabilities for over 30 years.

Advertisement

Meanwhile, Israel DOES have nuclear weapons and hasn’t signed up to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). Israel is the only one that’s been breaking international law and invading multiple countries, all at the same time.

Plus, Carney’s idea of ‘Iran-related hostilities’ is simply the US and Israel’s bullshit, imperialist aggression against Iran.

‘Imperialist running dog’

It seems like only yesterday the Canadian PM told the US to suck it. In fact, it kind of was – he gave a surprisingly blistering speech in Davos at the end of January.

During his speech, he called the old “rules-based” order an illusion.

Then, he made a completely unexpected set of remarks. He described the idea that Canada’s ties with the US bring “mutual benefit” as a “lie”.

Advertisement

As the Canary previously reported:

Carney’s remarks came as EU nations started to move troops into Greenland for ‘exercises’ that were really preparations to fight a US invasion. But Canada’s military was also doing the same – Trump has frequently expressed his lust to make Canada a 51st US state, according to Canadian Daily the Globe and Mail.

Of course, Carney is only against the US’s imperialism when it isn’t working in his favour.

In one powerful moment, he noted how:

there is a strong tendency for countries to go along to get along, to accommodate, to avoid trouble, to hope that compliance will buy safety.

Of course, fighting against the economics of the US’s imperialism only goes so far for a spineless liberal. After all, he was governor of the Bank of Canada and the Bank of England, after spending 13 years at Goldman Sachs.

Advertisement

The rich for the rich, and all that.

Carney has now made it abundantly clear that he was only referring to rich, white nations. Obviously, he only meant Canada and Greenland when he stood up to Trump:

A settler colonial conquest

Of course, the statement is about what you’d expect from another settler colonial nation, which is dripping in its own genocidal history. Its complicity with Israel’s genocide undoubtedly does a lot of the heavy lifting with that crappy IsRaEL HaS ThE rIGhT tO DEfeND ITseLF bullshit.

Like the UK, the US, and several other European Zionist muppets, Canada has also been supplying arms, cutting funds to UNRWA, and laying cover for Israel. The Canadian government even grants tax relief to donors funding a notorious Zionist propaganda organisation: NGO Monitor.

But why are we surprised? Carney stood idly by whilst Israel committed genocide for two and a half years, the US kidnapped Venezuela’s president, and he said fuck all about Cuba for weeks. It’s perfectly in tune with his morals that only appear when rich white people might get their feelings hurt.

Featured image via HG

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

Churchill statue branded ‘zionist war criminal’ in Whitehall

Published

on

Churchill statue branded ‘zionist war criminal’ in Whitehall

Conservatives and fascists got two absolute spankings last night. First, their man lost in the Gorton and Denton by-election. Then an activist graffitied Churchill’s statue in Whitehall — and not for the first time. That’s a tough 24hrs for people who think they’re living in the movie Zulu because they once saw an Asian person in Big Asda.

Here’s the Canary’s news report on the incident.

You can see the ‘damage’ — I mean, it does just wash off — below:

Poor Winston got called a ‘Zionist war criminal’. Another part of the graffiti said ‘stop the genocide’. Thing is… Churchill was a proud Zionist and a key architect of several British imperial genocides. So while it is a bit naughty to spray that stuff on his statue… what was said isn’t technically inaccurate. The graffiti also said ‘free Palestine’, which doubtless added to the right-wing meltdown.

Met Police said a man was arrested at the scene at 4am on 27 February. It’s striking that he was detained for “racially aggravated criminal damage”:

Proud Zionist

Churchill was a racist, Zionist and imperialist to his core. In fact to be fair to him he never said he wasn’t. He held these views proudly and loudly. The only people who have an issue with this basic fact are his weird cultists. Who, perversely, are often also racists.

Left-wing writer Tariq Ali wrote a (bloody good) book about the cult of Churchill and the reality of the man’s views. He told Current Affairs in May 2022:

He was a supporter of the Spanish fascist dictator Francisco Franco. He supported Franco like Hitler and Mussolini did in the Spanish Civil War.

Churchill was also “a terribly open admirer” of Italian fascist leader Benito Mussolini:

Advertisement

He said, what a great role Mussolini was playing in Italy. [“I could not help being charmed by his gentle, simple bearing,” Churchill said of Mussolini.

Then we have the 1943 Bengal famine, which may have killed 3mn people. A British-manufactured horror which:

Churchill refused, explicitly, to intervene to stop that famine.

And don’t forget Churchill’s 1944 crushing of the Greek resistance in favour of fascism:

the order given to the British commander, who the resistance had allowed to enter Athens, that if the resistance doesn’t do as we say, treat Athens as a colonial city. And the bloodbath that occurred in Greece as General Scobie tried to crush the Greek resistance.

Churchill’s views, as you can imagine, on Palestine flow quite naturally from these.

Churchill and Israel

Churchill, like so many imperialists in his day and ours, was both a supporter of Zionism AND an antisemite.

Advertisement

He supported the Balfour Declaration (the colonialist Middle East carve-up which helped get us where we are today) as British colonial secretary:

 I am in full sympathy with the historical traditional aspirations of the Jews.

And said:

Jerusalem must be the only ultimate goal. When it will be achieved it is vain to prophesy; but that it will some day be achieved is one of the few certainties of the future.

Yet he wrote in 1940 that Jews

have been partly responsible for the antagonism from which they suffer.

And that:

Advertisement

there are times when one feels instinctively that all this is only another manifestation of the difference, the separateness of the Jew.

Of the Palestinians and their claim on their homeland, he had absolute contempt:

I do not admit that the dog in the manger has the final right to the manger even though he may have lain there for a very long time.

He also denied that:

a great wrong has been done to the Red Indians of America, or the Black people of Australia.

Churchill said such people had just been replaced with “a higher grade race.”

Nice bloke…

Advertisement

Now vandalising public monuments these days is going to get you in trouble — whether the politics are agreeable or not. In this case it seems to have been Dutch pro-Palestine activists. But if we’re talking about the graffiti itself, the claims made aren’t inaccurate. So maybe it’s time butthurt Churchill fans stop pretending and own their hero’s legacy as a racist and bigot.

Featured image via the Canary

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Pakistan declares ‘open war’ as fighting with Afghanistan rages

Published

on

Pakistan declares ‘open war’ as fighting with Afghanistan rages

Fighting on the Afghanistan-Pakistan border has intensified. One Pakistani minister has described it as a state of “open war”. And Pakistan has hit the Afghan capital Kabul with airstrikes.

Afghan forces launched attacks across the British-created Durand line on 26 February. And Pakistan has called the Taliban regime — which replaced the US-led occupation in 2021 — illegitimate and accused it of harbouring militants.

Information Minister Attaullah Tarar said on 27 February:

Afghan soil is not being used; but, the Afghan Taliban regime is fully aligned with these terrorists and is completely backing these terrorists.

Al Jazeera reported on 27 February:

Advertisement

Pakistan launched air strikes on Afghanistan’s capital, Kabul, as well as on Kandahar and Paktia, early on Friday. The attacks targeted Taliban military installations as Islamabad declared “open war” on the group’s government, in the most serious military confrontation between the two neighbours in years.

One Kabul resident described her terror:

Then we heard gunfire. When we looked out of our apartment window, we saw bullet-like flames going up in the sky.

Al Jazeera said the airstrikes:

came hours after Afghan forces launched coordinated cross-border attacks on Pakistani military positions in six border provinces late on Thursday. Kabul claimed 55 Pakistani soldiers were killed and 19 outposts captured.

Border war

Border fighting broke out in October 2025. A subsequent Turkey and Qatar-brokered ceasefire has now broken down.

The origins of the fighting are complicated. Ahram Online reported:

Advertisement

Islamabad argues that the authorities in Kabul, led by the Taliban, have failed to curb the activities of Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan, a separate but ideologically aligned group that has intensified attacks inside Pakistan since 2021.

The Taliban deny this is the case. Kabul-based political analyst Obaidullah Baheer said:

Pakistan claimed that it was doing that in response to TTP attacks based on the bogus claim that the Taliban are supporting the TTP, an insurgent group operating within Pakistan.

Drop Site News posted a timeline of the breakdown in diplomatic relations since January 2026:

The Pakistan has also banned personal drones after Afghan forces used unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) in their attack:

The ban is effective nationwide immediately and will remain in place until further directives are issued. All provincial governments and chief secretaries have been asked to ensure strict enforcement of the directive.

Vast US arsenal

A vast arsenal of US military equipment and weaponry was left behind in 2021. Those weapons are now fuelling the war. As the Canary reported on 4 February:

those weapons have flooded neighbouring Pakistan

The Foundation for Economic Education broke down some of the numbers involved. They said the giant arsenal included:

Advertisement

includes up to 22,174 Humvee vehicles, nearly 1,000 armored vehicles, 64,363 machine guns, and 42,000 pick-up trucks and SUVs.

There were mind-boggling amounts of small arms — and even artillery:

the list of allegedly abandoned weaponry includes up to 358,530 assault rifles, 126,295 pistols, and nearly 200 artillery units.

CNN reported that the border region holds vast quantities of copper and other minerals and metals which the US craves:

Pakistan says there is much more wealth beneath its soil –– an estimated $8 trillion in copper, lithium, cobalt, gold, antimony and other critical minerals.

This reality has:

oiled an unlikely friendship with US President Donald Trump, who has put mineral acquisition at the heart of US foreign policy

Pakistan and Afghanistan’s colonial underpinnings

The colonial nature of the conflict zone can’t be ignored either. National Geographic describes the Durand Line as:

Advertisement

part of a long history of colonizing countries establishing borders that serve their own political purposes while ignoring the cultures and ethnicities of the people living there.

As Ahram Online explained:

The roots of the crisis trace back to 1893, when British diplomat Sir Mortimer Durand signed an agreement with Afghan ruler Abdur Rahman Khan to demarcate a frontier between British India and Afghanistan. That line split Pashtun tribal lands between two political entities.

After independence in 1947, Pakistan:

inherited the Durand Line as an international boundary under the principle of state succession. Successive Afghan governments, however, avoided formally recognizing it as a permanent border. The dispute has simmered for decades, occasionally flaring but rarely disappearing.

The neighbours view the border very differently:

Pakistan views the border as legally settled and central to its territorial integrity. Afghanistan’s position has historically been more ambiguous, shaped by ethnic ties, nationalist sentiment, and resistance to what many Afghans see as a colonial imposition.

This explosive combination of competing territorial visions and competition for vast mineral resources is compounded by colonial history and the presence on both sides of the border of vast arsenals of lost American weapons. And ordinary people of the region aren’t without agency, yet to some degree they remain hostage to imperialisms both old and new.

Advertisement

Featured image via the Canary

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Brit Awards 2026: What Geese Star Max Bassin Said In His Censored Speech

Published

on

Brit Awards 2026: What Geese Star Max Bassin Said In His Censored Speech

It’s fair to say that the censors had plenty to keep them busy during this year’s Brit Awards.

Saturday night’s Brits broadcast saw the sound being pulled on numerous occasions due to a variety of comments that were made over the course of the event.

One such moment came during musician Max Bassin’s acceptance speech, after he accepted the International Group Of The Year prize on behalf of his band Geese.

Choosing to keep things short, he began his speech by stating simply: “What’s up, ‘the Brits’? I just want to say, free Palestine…”

Advertisement

However, after Max said the word “free”, the audio was pulled, resulting in the rest of what he had to say being cut from broadcast.

It later emerged that Max concluded his speech: “Fuck ICE, go Geese.”

Many Brits viewers were quick to voice their upset at what appeared to be ITV censoring Max’s politically-charged speech right as the drummer was about to speak out in solidarity with Palestine.

ITV bleeped out Geese’s speech saying Free Palestine😒😒

— James (@jamesIipa) February 28, 2026

Advertisement

seeing ITV censor Geese saying free Palestine in real time feels so gross and dystopian

— brodie / knox (@brodiecantskate) February 28, 2026

itv muting geese saying “free palestine” embarrassing !!

— paige (@SSN0WGL0BE) February 28, 2026

itv blanking out geese saying free palestine im sooo tired of the censorship in this wretched country my god

— bec ☄️ (@lokiislit) February 28, 2026

However, in response to this backlash, the broadcaster has indicated to HuffPost UK that Max’s speech was censored due to his language after his pro-Palestine message – in other words, his use of the word “fuck” – rather than because of his political statements.

Advertisement

Earlier in the night, the Brits also pulled the sound when Jack Whitehall made a seemingly unscripted joke about Peter Mandelson, after spotting Manchester mayor Andy Burnham and Labour minister Lisa Nandy in the awards show’s audience.

“I wonder who else is here,” he quipped. “I think I saw Peter Mandelson on the list. Oh wait, that was another list…”

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

US citizens’ support for Israel plummets, new data confirms

Published

on

US citizens' support for Israel plummets, new data confirms

Israel’s Gaza genocide and constant demands for money and military support have caused its popularity to nosedive among US citizens. A new Gallup poll shows a dramatic about-turn in the colony’s standing across the board, especially among Democrats and unaligned voters, but reaching even to the Republican party.

The change is even more dramatic considering how stubbornly Americans held onto their support for Israel through decades of its abuses and slaughter of Palestinians. Almost two and a half years of ongoing genocide have finally shifted things in a healthier direction and the change has Israel and its lobby flailing.

Before 7 October 2023, more than half of Americans favoured Israel over Palestine, while less than a third felt the opposite. Now, 41% say their sympathies are with the Palestinians and support for Israel is barely over a third:

US support for Israel plummets

The fall has been accelerating. In May 2025, Gallup found that support for Israel among Americans was 46%, a figure that was already significantly down. Since then, Israel has lost almost a quarter of the support it still had at that point.

Advertisement

However, Gallup’s data show that the change was already underway before the 7 October 2023 raid into southern Israel, though it accelerated markedly after that. This is almost certainly indicative of the US right’s growing dissatisfaction with what it perceives as an “Israel first” approach of US government and many politicians. Even the late right-wing icon Charlie Kirk had disavowed his support for the colony and rejected its money before he was publicly murdered in September 2025, though the Israel lobby moved quickly to try to hide it after his death.

The fall has been sharpest among registered supporters of the US Democratic party. Ten years ago, half of Democrats supported Israel; now, that has fallen to just 17%:

In a sane world, or even a genuine democracy, such a shift in support would have a profound effect on US foreign policy. That the US continues to pursue war on Israel’s behalf — with Democrat lawmakers scarcely less supportive than Republicans — shows just how diseased, bought and corrupted US politics is under the Israel lobby, like its counterpart in the UK.

Featured image via the author

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Campaign Against Antisemitism wrist slapped for ‘mismanagement’

Published

on

Campaign Against Antisemitism wrist slapped for 'mismanagement'

The Charity Commission has found what it described as “mismanagement” by the misnamed ‘Campaign Against Antisemitism’ (CAA) for political activities at odds with its status as a ‘charity’. The CAA claims to combat antisemitism, but is in fact an Israel-funded lobby group that specialises in “defaming Palestine solidarity campaigners.”

CAA has been under scrutiny since September 2024, when it attacked as “obscene” the Starmer government for daring to make even a phantom reduction in arms licences to Israel. A further complaint was lodged with the Commission by human rights group CAGE in 2025. CAGE describes CAA, along with its fellow lobby group ‘UK Lawyers for Israel,’ as “Britain’s apartheid lobby” for their vexatious attacks on support for the Palestinian people against occupation, oppression and genocide.

However, the Commission’s announcement falls far short of the appropriate step of stripping a political lobbying group of its charitable status. This is hardly surprising: the Commission has been investigating CAA since at least 2018 without effective action.

Campaign Against Antisemitism guilty of mismanagement

The Charity Commission criticised CAA’s ‘failure’ to retain records relating to its 2024 political attack as “mismanagement”, said it had doubts that CAA’s statement “furthered the charity’s [supposed] objectives” and said it had issued the CAA with a “remedial Action Plan”. This treats CAA as if its conduct were merely shoddy and in need of improvement, rather than in line with its real, Israel-supporting goals — even though the Commission admitted it had received other complaints about its behaviour.

Advertisement

The Commission views failing to retain records relating to this decision making as mismanagement in the administration of this charity.

Further complaints have also been raised about CAA’s attack on the UK’s judicial system because a jury had dared to declare the Starmer regime’s ‘terror’ ban on anti-genocide group Palestine Action unlawful. CAA has boasted of its role in securing the ban.

CAA boss Gideon Falter is one of the central figures in the Israel lobby’s attacks on the Labour left during the Corbyn era. In 2024, as hundreds of thousands protested peacefully against Israel’s genocide in Gaza, he tried to claim that police had prevented him from ‘crossing a road’ because of the threat posed by a ‘hateful’ anti-genocide march. In fact, he had turned up with a security detail — not to ‘cross’ the road but to try to barge through the demo in the opposite direction.

Jewish anti-genocide group JVL lodged a 2020 complaint that CAA is a “highly politically partisan organisation which does not deserve charitable status”. JVL welcomed the Commission’s action against CAA as “not before time”. However, in reality it amounts to nothing more than a light slap on the wrist for one of the Israel lobby’s worst offenders. It evidences once again how spineless UK institutions are against the genocide lobby.

Featured image via the Canary

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Arrested At The SOTU… For Standing

Published

on

Arrested At The SOTU... For Standing

!function(n){if(!window.cnx){window.cnx={},window.cnx.cmd=[];var t=n.createElement(‘iframe’);t.display=’none’,t.onload=function(){var n=t.contentWindow.document,c=n.createElement(‘script’);c.src=”//cd.connatix.com/connatix.player.js”,c.setAttribute(‘async’,’1′),c.setAttribute(‘type’,’text/javascript’),n.body.appendChild(c)},n.head.appendChild(t)}}(document);(new Image()).src=”https://capi.connatix.com/tr/si?token=19654b65-409c-4b38-90db-80cbdea02cf4″;cnx.cmd.push(function(){cnx({“playerId”:”19654b65-409c-4b38-90db-80cbdea02cf4″,”mediaId”:”a8b1493a-8194-46b7-9354-6895828cf102″}).render(“69a3841be4b008ee6ce24eb6”);});

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Netanyahu reportedly abandons Israelis

Published

on

Netanyahu reportedly abandons Israelis

War criminal Benjamin Netanyahu has fled and flown to Greece – like he did in last year’s ’12-day war’ – as retaliatory Iranian missiles batter Israel.

What else would the butcher of Gaza, Netanyahu, do but display his wide yellow streak, turn tail and run – leaving ‘his’ country and its occupying population to burn behind him.

Genocidal Netanyahu is a coward

And how it showed. While Netanyahu ran away, Iran’s missiles skipped past Israel’s defences as easily as they did in June 2025 and wrought havoc. There were scenes of utter panic at Israeli ports and shelters:

This is not even Iran’s full response yet. Whereas last year it used swarms of drones and missiles to overwhelm Israel’s defences, now it apparently needed just thirty:

Advertisement

US news station NBC broadcast one major strike:

A Mossad-run call centre was hit, according to not yet confirmed reports:

Israeli TV was broadcasting live as a missile struck:

Footage showed other missiles breaching Israel’s ‘dome’:

Advertisement

Some of the missiles, though not all, were ballistic – though not yet apparently Iran’s most effective hypersonic types:

Israeli propaganda account ‘Stand With Us’ has just reported ‘red’ warnings across Israel, showing the scale of danger and panic:

Advertisement

And new footage posted by an ABN News producer shows that the attack continues to intensify:

Locally-shot footage showed devastation where the missiles struck:

Advertisement

The coward Netanyahu and his colony love to bomb and murder children and the defenceless. They run away when a victim can strike back.

Featured image via the Canary

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Brit Awards 2027: All The Must-See Moments You Might Have Missed

Published

on

What a smile, what a suit, what a shoe choice

The biggest night in British music was an especially big one this year.

On Saturday night, the 2026 Brit Awards took place in Manchester for the first time, in a night that delivered glittering performance, a few surprise wins and plenty of moments that kept ITV’s censors busy.

If you missed this year’s broadcast and want to catch up (or, indeed, if you were only half-watching, and you’re wondering if there were any bits that completely passed you by), then you’re in luck, because we’ve rounded up X of the top must-see moments from the 2026 Brit Awards…

Before the ceremony was even underway, Harry Styles made us smile on the red carpet with this business suit/ballet pumps combo

Anthony Harvey/Shutterstock

Rosalía got her night off to a suitably dramatic start with this complete serve

Anthony Harvey/Shutterstock

And it was a strong showing all-round from some of our fave celeb couples, including Jade and Jordan Stephens

Anthony Harvey/Shutterstock

…and darts icon Luke Littler and his long-term girlfriend Faith Millar

Advertisement

Comedian Jack Whitehall kicked off his sixth time hosting the Brits with a skit paying homage to his love of Harry Styles

The man himself then opened the show properly with a performance of Aperture, complete with a lot of hand-ography and bum-wiggling

Jack Whitehall pulled absolutely no punches with his introductory Brits monologue, coming for everyone from Alex Warren (‘what you get if you order Ed Sheeran on Temu’), Lily Allen (‘her album was launched into the charts like a torpedo – only this torpedo didn’t sink a ship, it destroyed a Harbour’), Robbie Williams (‘he’s had more comebacks than his hairline’) and Noel Gallagher (‘Songwriter Of The Year… 1996’)

Oh, and he also delivered this jibe at the expense of the BBC

Jack Whitehall dings the BAFTAS at the #BRITAwards: “There may be some swearing but don’t worry, we’ve got the best in the business on the bleep button. It’s the guy who did the BAFTAS. Nothing gets past him” pic.twitter.com/qeNewZyYQm

— Deadline (@DEADLINE) February 28, 2026

Advertisement

The voices of Huntr/x brought the joy with a performance – a pre-recorded one, we should add – of their hit Golden

And Olivia Dean’s rendition of Man I Need was similarly just… absolutely lovely, to be honest

Raye’s vocals on her renditions of Where Is My Husband! and Nightingale Lane were truly jaw-dropping

I need non raye stans to know how crazy the nightingale lane brits performance is, she’s been sick for WEEKSSSSS like she really gave this one her all omfg pic.twitter.com/SswFYVgV7O

— MⱯRGⱯUX 🦇 (@LUCIDNIGHTM4RE) February 28, 2026

…and they were similarly quick to censor an introduction by Angry Ginge, to (he was jokingly calling London a ‘shithole’ if you’re interested)

Jack Whitehall then told us we were about to have ‘our minds blown by the incomparable Rosalía’ and he was absolutely not wrong

Advertisement

Oh and yes, Rosalía actually managed to get Björk back performing at the Brits for the first time in more than 30 years

The sound was pulled once again after Geese musician Max Bassin declared ‘free Palestine, fuck ICE’ during his International Group Of The Year speech

Jack Whitehall’s exchange with Shaun Ryder and Bez started off chaotic and only ventured into increasingly surreal territory

Alex Warren’s performance included a surprise guest spot from James Blunt because hey why not?

Noel Gallagher kicked off his Songwriter Of The Year speech by thanking his brother and Oasis bandmate Liam

Mark Ronson’s Outstanding Contribution performance featured some lovely tributes to Amy Winehouse

…as well as a surprise(-ish) appearance from Dua Lipa

Rosalía’s special night just kept getting better as she was crowned International Artist Of The Year, beating some seriously stiff competition including Taylor Swift, Chappell Roan, Bad Bunny, Bruno Mars, Sabrina Carpenter and Lady Gaga

And CMAT had some fun with the cameras at losing out in this category for the second time

The night’s top winner Olivia Dean was visibly elated to pick up the Brits’ top honour, Album Of The Year

And finally, following a speech by Sharon Osbourne and her daughter Kelly, Robbie Williams was absolutely spot-on with his musical tribute to Ozzy Osbourne, which closed the show

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Tel Aviv gets a taste of its own medicine

Published

on

Tel Aviv gets a taste of its own medicine

In maybe the only good news of the year so far, Iranian ballistic missiles have struck both Tel Aviv – including Mossad HQ – causing major damage.

Of course, white Jewish Israelis will be running to their cosy little bomb shelters. Meanwhile, as we have seen previously, the illegal settlers exclude minorities.

And Netanyahu? The dickhead responsible for the chaos across the entirety of the Middle East flew out of Tel Aviv quicker than Donald Trump can post to Truth Social when new Epstein files drop.

IsNOTrael is getting a taste of its own medicine.

And I’m guessing all media broadcasts will be banned from Israel in 3, 2, 1…

Israel is finally getting an iota of what it deserves for murdering thousands of Palestinians.

Advertisement

Netanyahu and Trump bomb civilian areas, killing children in the process, and then run, hide or party. They give zero fucks about the lives they are taking.

Anyone who has chosen to stay in Israel after watching Netanyahu and his terrorist government wage war on Palestinians for the last two and a half years needs to give their head a shake. And quite frankly, I have zero sympathy that they now have bombs falling on them.

Featured image via the Canary 

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Defendant claims Zahwa Mukhtar’s death was “an accident”

Published

on

Hearing aid found at scene of Zahwa Mukhtar murder

The man on trial for the murder of 27-year-old Zahwa Mukhtar expressed his remorse that none of the six occupants of the car adequately checked she was conscious.

“She was still breathing”

During his final day giving evidence, Duane Owusu was quizzed on his defence statement, probed on how the car they’d been travelling in circled back twice towards Zahwa. The first time was within minutes of her receiving an “open-handed shove” by Owusu.

Another witness in the car said she was still breathing, but he didn’t look for himself. On Friday, the 36-year-old defendant said:

I didn’t even believe she was seriously injured, that’s honestly the truth. I didn’t think I caused a serious injury […] Nobody got out the car to check, that’s what I regret.

The defence statement continued:

Advertisement

The group then drove off unaware that [Zahwa] had sustained a life-threatening injury but shortly afterwards decided to return. Before they could do so the vehicle was stopped by police.

The stop, which was on suspicion of drugs, lasted about 50 minutes, during which time Owusu told jurors he thought Zahwa might appear and tell them herself what had happened.

Steering clear

He didn’t want to drive back to Zahwa, who was outside a care home in Chadwell Heath Lane, due to repeated altercations between her and two other women in the car, Paige Allen and Abigail Winter. Owusu believed returning would have risked reigniting those arguments if she re-entered the car, he told the court.

When Owusu learned Zahwa still hadn’t moved, he agreed with others to return to check on her. On route, he asked to be let out of the car, but the driver refused.

The defendant said:

Advertisement

I agreed, let’s go back, but as he’s done the u-turn, I just didn’t want to be involved with the fighting so I was going to remove myself from the whole group.

Henrietta Paget KC, prosecuting, suggested Owusu wanted to put as much distance as possible between himself and “the scene”.

“No,” he began.

The whole night I was preventing them from fighting, stopping the fights..I was just tired…I was basically being a peacemaker. I felt like the whole night I was just being a babysitter for people, which I don’t mind doing, but I’d just had enough of the fighting.

Defendant maintains his innocence

Evidence of altercations between all three women was mentioned in court, including one of Owusu’s conversations and reference to a cut on Paige’s nose from 16 August, before Zahwa’s death.

Before being struck in the neck, the prosecution’s case is that two kicks were aimed towards the finance assistant’s face.

Advertisement

Referring again to Owusu’s defence statement, Ms Paget read:

The kicking motions were not intended as strikes but were made to create distance and to move the deceased away from the vehicle as he was concerned that she would attempt to re-enter the car or place herself at risk.

He did not intend to, and did not, make contact with her and disengaged once she was clear and another female intervened.

She ask asked:

What does it mean, you didn’t mean to make contact with her?

Owusu replied that he didn’t mean to harm or hurt Zahwa.

Advertisement

On the advice of his legal team, Owusu answered ‘no comment’ to questions during his police interview and was arrested before he’d had a chance to hand himself in, he said.

Everything that happened was a total accident. I’m traumatised talking about that and I’m deeply sorry. That wasn’t how the night was supposed to go.

Owusu, of Althorne Way, Dagenham, denies murder and manslaughter.

The verdict is expected next week at the Old Bailey.

Featured image via the Canary

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025