Business
CLSA flags margin recovery ahead for HDFC Bank, predicts 27% headroom despite weak start to the year
Addressing investor concerns around slower deposit growth and the lack of immediate margin improvement post-merger, CLSA believes these issues are either temporary or misunderstood.
It expects FY27 to be a “bounce-back year” for the bank, supported by improving operating dynamics and cost rationalisation.
Valuations, according to CLSA, are now attractive, with HDFC Bank trading at a 10–12% price-to-book (PB) discount to ICICI Bank. The brokerage believes this valuation gap may not be justified in the long term, especially as cost discipline improves.
Core operating expenses (opex) are expected to grow at 5–7% year-on-year, compared to 10% growth in loans. CLSA adds that slower hiring and reallocation of staff to customer-facing roles are signs of operational tightening.
The brokerage forecasts HDFC Bank’s core pre-provision operating profit (PPOP) to grow at high-teens levels over the next two years, supported by operational efficiency and loan book expansion. Although return on equity (ROE) is currently lower than ICICI Bank’s, CLSA notes that at 1.7x FY28 PB, the risk-reward for HDFC Bank appears “extremely favourable.”
HDFC Bank share price history
Over the past six months, the stock of HDFC Bank has seen a decline of 4.74%, reflecting a gradual downward drift in sentiment. In the last three months alone, it has slipped by 3.39%, while the one-month performance has been even more subdued, with a sharper drop of 5.54%.
Technical charts indicate weakness in HDFC Bank shares
On charts, the shares of HDFC Bank are currently placed below all their significant daily exponential moving averages. The RSI for the stocks stands at 25.6, according to the Trendlyne data.
An RSI below 30 is typically considered to indicate an oversold condition, suggesting the stock may be poised for a potential rebound.
Also read: TCS shares slip marginally after Q3 profit drops 14% YoY. What should investors do?
(Disclaimer: Recommendations, suggestions, views and opinions given by the experts are their own. These do not represent the views of The Economic Times)
