Connect with us

Politics

Netflix Announces Harry Styles Concert Special One Night In Manchester

Published

on

Netflix Announces Harry Styles Concert Special One Night In Manchester

If you missed out on tickets to any of Harry Styles’ upcoming shows, we have good news for you.

If you didn’t win the ticket lottery and score a spot in the crowd, fear not, because it’s now been confirmed that Netflix is recording the show.

In celebration of the release of his new album, Kiss All the Time. Disco, Occasionally, the Aperture singer will perform a special One Night Only concert in Manchester’s Co-Op Live, where he is expected to perform all 12 tracks from his upcoming fourth album.

Advertisement

Fortunately, those who weren’t able to snag tickets won’t have to wait long to watch the concert in the comfort of their own homes in a new Netflix special.

Titled Harry Styles: One Night In Manchester, the concert movie will be available to stream on Netflix from Sunday 8 March, marking the first time fans can watch a Harry Styles solo show on their own TV.

Following this show in Manchester, the former One Direction star will embark on a global tour in support of his album, which includes a record-breaking 12-night run at Wembley this summer.

Advertisement

Over the weekend, the Grammy-winning artist gave his first live performance in three years at the 2026 Brit Awards.

Joined by a group of back-up dancers, Harry performed his recent number one hit Aperture, which was accompanied by an eccentric dance routine.

Harry Styles: One Night in Manchester debuts globally on Netflix at 7pm on Sunday 8 March.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

Kelly Osbourne Doubles Down On Appearance Critics After Brit Awards

Published

on

Kelly Osbourne Doubles Down On Appearance Critics After Brit Awards

Over the weekend, Kelly joined her mum Sharon Osbourne at the Brits, where they delivered a speech in honour of Ozzy Osbourne’s posthumous Lifetime Achievement prize.

On Monday, Kelly reposted another message from fellow rock star’s daughter Mia Tyler, which admonished those who would “dissect someone’s appearance instead of honouring their courage” while they are grieving.

Public grief is not public property,” the original post read. “Grief can change a person. That doesn’t make their body a topic for debate. Before you comment on someone’s body, consider the possibility that they’re carrying something heavier than your opinion.

“It takes real strength to stand in the public eye, accepting accolades for their late iconic father and hold themselves together in front of the world. The least we can do is show the same grace in return. Kindness costs nothing. Cruelty costs character.”

Advertisement

Mia’s post concluded: “It’s unsettling how quickly people will dissect someone’s appearance instead of honouring their courage. If you have the energy to comment, you have the energy to be kind. Choose accordingly.”

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Ties to Israel plague Democrats in top primaries post-Gaza

Published

on

Ties to Israel plague Democrats in top primaries post-Gaza

Israel, after a long, devastating war in Gaza, has become so unpopular among many voters in the Democratic base that major candidates in top primaries are using even small connections to the country’s political leaders to hit their opponents.

One Illinois Democratic operative involved in this year’s primaries has dredged up a 2019 trip that Illinois U.S. Senate candidate Juliana Stratton took to Israel to meet with the then-leader of the Israeli opposition Tzipi Livni. The operative, who was granted anonymity because they feared getting blacklisted from future political campaigns, went even further back citing a decade-old plus arrest warrant a British court issued related to a weeks-long conflict with Gaza that started in December 2008. And one of Stratton’s opponents has gone on the record criticizing the trip.

Livni, of course, is one of Netanyahu’s top critics and is solidly on the left in Israel. She is a vocal advocate of a Palestinian state aside a secure Israel despite support for a two-state solution in Israel falling precipitously in recent years. And she has met with numerous Democratic politicians over the years, including Joe Biden in 2010, Barack Obama in 2013 and a congressional delegation led by Nancy Pelosi in 2018.

Despite that record, Illinois Senate primary opponent Rep. Robin Kelly (D-Ill.) said that Stratton’s 2019 meeting with Livni raises questions about her leadership.

Advertisement

“Illinois voters believe that judgement matters,” she said in a statement to POLITICO when asked about Stratton’s Livni meeting. “Juliana Stratton owes them an explanation.”

Kelly sees her stance on Livni as one of her progressive bona fides.

“When I first ran for office I made a promise that nothing would compromise my ability to look myself in the mirror each day, and I’ve spent my career standing up and speaking out against injustice,” she said. “I’m the only candidate to call what happened in Gaza a genocide, reject AIPAC money, and refuse ICE-contractor cash.”

Kelly’s views on Israel’s conduct in Gaza have also shifted since she entered the Senate race in May. Kelly and Stratton, who is backed by Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker, are facing Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-Ill.), the frontrunner in the March 17 primary. Less than a year ago, Kelly even accepted donations from pro-Israel lobby AIPAC, and she’s been to Israel numerous times as part of congressional trips. In January, Kelly said she wouldn’t take AIPAC money again.

Advertisement

Even tangential ties to the longtime U.S. ally are likely to become campaign issues across the country as the conflict with Iran intensifies into a regional conflagration. All three candidates following the strikes on Iran were quick to condemn the joint U.S.-Israeli action, citing what they believed was Trump’s overreach and swift action without congressional approval. Other Democrats have voiced concern that Trump’s decision could plunge the U.S. into another protracted war in the Middle East.

A Gallup poll released Friday found that around two-thirds of Democrats sympathize more with the Palestinians with only around 20 percent saying they are aligned with Israelis, down from half of Democrats being pro-Israel in 2016. Nearly 50 percent of Democrats even had an unfavorable view of the Israeli people, while the same amount had a favorable view, according to a Pew poll taken in September.

Stratton is not the only Democratic candidate who has been criticized by rivals for ties to Israel. In the Michigan Senate race, Abdul El-Sayed has blasted rival Rep. Haley Stevens (D-Mich.) for being a vocal advocate of Israel and protesters have shown up to her office to denounce donations she’s received from AIPAC. Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-Texas), whose Senate primary is Tuesday, has also been forced to defend herself for voting to fund defensive weapons for Israel.

Stratton, the current lieutenant governor of Illinois, went to Israel as part of the “2019 Influential Women in Leadership Delegation” organized by the America-Israel Friendship League and the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs. A video from the organization shows her meeting with Livni, the former vice prime minister and foreign affairs minister.

Advertisement

In 2009, a British court issued an arrest warrant for Livni over accusations of war crimes in Gaza for her role during Operation Cast Lead. She was a member of the Israeli war cabinet during the conflict, which Palestinian authorities and an Israeli human rights organization said killed hundreds of Palestinian civilians.

She was supposed to give a speech in London at the time but later cancelled her trip. The warrant was withdrawn after the court found out that she wasn’t in the U.K. and the British government formally apologized to her for the arrest warrant.

She also had told Palestinian counterparts in 2007 during negotiations that even though she was the justice minister, “I am against law – international law in particular” and that “Palestinians don’t really need international law.”

Livni’s office has said she was “proud of all her decisions regarding Operation Cast Lead” and that the conflict achieved its objectives to protect Israel and restore Israel’s deterrence from Hamas rocket attacks from Gaza.

Advertisement

The America-Israel Friendship League, the Israeli Foreign Affairs Ministry and Livni didn’t respond to requests for comment.

Although Israel has yet to become a leading issue in the campaign, at a recent debate Stratton said she wanted to “see the suffering end” in the region and said that Netanyahu should step down.

Asked about the trip, a Stratton campaign spokesperson said in an email that the Livni meeting was “a group meeting that took place on a delegation trip promoting women in leadership coordinated by a third party – Juliana did not arrange the meeting and was one of several participants.” The spokesperson reiterated that she supports a two-state solution and “wants to see lasting peace in the region.”

This reporting first appeared in Illinois Playbook. Sign up to receive it in your inbox every weekday.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Starmer strong man act falls flat

Published

on

Starmer strong man act falls flat

UK PM Keir Starmer gave his best attempt to tell Trump off in the House of Commons. This comes in response to Trump’s recent jab at the British government’s supposed delay to jump on board with the war in Iran. Trump said that Starmer “took far too long” to allow the US military to use a UK base in Cyprus.

Of course, just hours after Starmer publicly announced that permission had been granted, the base was attacked in retaliation for facilitating the US invasion of Iran. And, it must be noted, this is a war which many ex-military officials in the US have already labelled “illegal.”

So, when Starmer’s ‘rebuke’ of Trump did come, it fell rather flat.

Starmer strong man act falls flat

Stating that the US President has ‘expressed his disagreement’ with the UK, the weak PM attempted to look strong by justifying his decision as one of British national interest. Starmer said:

Advertisement

The lessons of history have taught us that it is important when we make decisions like this, that we establish there is a lawful basis for what the United Kingdom is doing.

That is one of the lessons from Iraq, and that there’s a viable thought-through plan with an objective that can be achieved or has a viable prospect of being achieved.

He continued:

This government does not believe in regime change from the skies.

But, it does believe in assisting US-led regime change via supplying airbases?

This belated ‘strong man’ impression offered by Starmer has been received as the damp squib it is. After all, the human rights barrister-turned-leader has had no problem supporting his allies in their numerous war crimes. He has been perfectly happy shielding war criminals responsible for a genocide against Palestinians.

Advertisement

Pressure from MAGA

However, this bravado exposes how impossible it is to have a diplomatic relationship with the demagogue US President. It is well known how Trump uses economic and military warfare to get his own way, highlighting the terrifying precedent being set by the rogue president for ‘diplomacy’.

Now our government is under pressure by the MAGA administration to get involved with their illegal war on Iran, it is more important than ever that we demand a divergence from the US. It cannot be understated that this aggression threatens chaos and suffering across the region, a chaos will undoubtedly and deservedly reach our shores.

It’s clear Starmer is going to great pains to differentiate between offensive and defensive military actions. But, the fact the UK is involved at all makes Starmer’s so-called ‘challenge’ to Trump look pathetic.

Iran has the right to retaliate under international law to threats posed against its sovereign territory. With our diplomatic cover and spineless behaviour, the UK is supporting the existential threat Iran faces from the US and Israel. Ignoring that, the UK Prime Minister appears to apply international law selectively – invoking and interpreting it in ways that shield the United States and Israel from accountability.

Advertisement

“Special relationship” under strain

Like a child throwing his toys out of the pram as per usual, Trump has already retaliated. He stated today that our relationship is now strained, indicating the cost that comes through legitimising Trump’s rogue, illegal and escalating decisions:

Our own Joe Glenton wrote in February about just how occupied we are by the US, signaling the tightrope and danger we are in if Trump is allowed to keep ignoring the rule of law. He wrote:

Advertisement

The UK is even more of a US military colony than we thought. New documents found in the US War Department’s website show that Britain hosts double the number of American military facilities previously reported.

Glenton finished with a vital rallying cry:

The truth is that Britain is a vassal state and colony of the United States. We say the UK would better off if it was not. US bases, troops and spies need to go.

Ordinary people thankfully can recognise legality better than our barrister PM. One X account commented on Starmer’s woefully manipulative speech, pointing out the legally obvious:

I’m just gonna leave this here.

UN Charter:
“Under international law, the UK can be held responsible if it permits its territory to be used by another state to commit an “internationally wrongful act” (such as an illegal war) if it has knowledge of the circumstances.”

It’s hard to believe Starmer doesn’t know this is illegal, especially due to his maneuvering and apparent discomfort with involvement in offensive actions. Maybe the UK PM is only happy with one illegal bombing campaign at a time, having been complicit in the genocide and heavily funded by the Israel lobby. Needless to say, his pushback to Trump is really just semantics and wordplay.

Advertisement

Curtis Daly pointed out on X just how easy this decision should have been:

Careful the company you keep, Starmer

This horrific war of aggression that has already killed hundreds of Iranians and wounded hundreds more has to be the wake-up call for allies of the US. The US is falling, it is in its final days after repeatedly decimating any respect previously afforded to it. It being allowed to maintain control of the world order will put all countries on the backfoot, whilst prioritising the interests that Trump serves: the super-rich and powerful.

This aggressive US world order will undoubtedly escalate, and it has never been more objectively clear that a thug sits in the White House. If we don’t want Trump’s angry, bloodthirsty glare to fall on the UK we must urge our spineless PM to actually object to the US and Israel’s unaccountable war on Iran.

Advertisement

Featured image via the Canary

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

‘Hold the Line on Rosebank’ – campaigners target parliament as oil field decision looms

Published

on

‘Hold the Line on Rosebank’ - campaigners target parliament as oil field decision looms

Campaigners from Fossil Free London formed a human red line along the riverbank directly across from Westminster on 3 March. All dressed in red, they held a long red ribbon and signs reading ‘Hold the Line’ and ‘Stop Rosebank’.

The demonstration comes as the government prepares to decide the fate of the Rosebank oil field. It’s the largest undeveloped oil field in the North Sea. However, the Scottish courts overturned its original approval in January 2025.

The court ruling demanded that the project’s primary owner, Norwegian state oil giant Equinor, provide a fuller assessment of the project’s climate impacts before any approval could proceed. Critics argue that burning Rosebank’s total reserves would produce more carbon dioxide than the world’s 28 lowest-income countries emit in a year combined. Also, the vast majority of the oil would go for export. So it wouldn’t be lowering UK energy bills or improving energy security.

The Rosebank development would also hand substantial tax relief from the public purse to Equinor. Equinor’s profits flow largely into Norway’s sovereign wealth fund. A share of profits would also go to the Delek Group, an Israeli fuel conglomerate. The UN has flagged this company for human rights violations in Palestine.

Advertisement

Joanna Warrington, spokesperson for Fossil Free London, said:

Whilst people across the country are watching their bills skyrocket and extreme weather events and climate disasters fill their phone screens: our government stands at a crossroads.

At this point in climate collapse, approving any new oil and gas project is tantamount to climate denial. It is like a doctor diagnosing a patient with lung cancer and handing them a cigarette.

A red line must be drawn. Kier Starmer, stop Rosebank.

Featured image via Fossil Free London

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Frictionmaxxing: What It Means, And How To Try It

Published

on

Some spring catkins on the left: goslings on the right

If TikTok is anything to go by, it seems the kids are “frictionmaxxing” (and by the kids, I mean gen Z – a generation of people anywhere from 14-29 years old).

The term, which was coined by author Kathryn Jezer-Morton in an article for The Cut, has gained some fans online.

And it ties into younger people’s increasingly analogue habits, like writing letters to one another and making reading cool again.

Though the term is new, a decades-old interview with author Kurt Vonnegut seemed to echo its principles. So, I gave it a try.

Advertisement

What is “frictionmaxxing”?

It’s about taking away the, well, frictionless ease of digital life and deliberately replacing it with less convenient, but more “human”, options.

The author wrote, “Friction-maxxing is not simply a matter of reducing your screen time, or whatever.

“It’s the process of building up tolerance for ‘inconvenience,’” which she stresses usually isn’t actually a lack of control over the problems of living among other people.

Advertisement

Some examples include not sharing your location with friends, so they have to ask where you are instead, not using large language models to answer your questions, and loosening the reins on your kids.

Jazer-Morton argued that friction is different to suffering. Joy is part of the point.

“An orientation toward friction is really the only defence we have against the life-annihilating suction of technologies of escape,” she wrote.

This idea might not be entirely new

Advertisement

“Frixtionmaxxing” reminded me of Kurt Vonnegut’s envelopes.

Speaking to PBS, the writer spoke about the time his wife asked why he went out to buy individual envelopes instead of just buying a stack to keep on hand.

“I pretend not to hear her. And go out to get an envelope because I’m going to have a hell of a good time in the process of buying one envelope,” he said.

“I meet a lot of people. And, see some great-looking babes. And a fire engine goes by. And I give them the thumbs up.”

Advertisement

The inconvenience, for him, was not just the point, but the joy of the trip.

For her part, Jazer-Morton said that “frictionmaxxing” should increase our tolerance of effort that isn’t strictly necessary, “reaching even toward enjoyment”.

Years before mass AI use, Vonnegut said, “the computers will do us out of that”.

Some spring catkins on the left: goslings on the right
Some spring catkins on the left: goslings on the right

I took a small step towards “frictionmaxxing” and was instantly convinced

All of which to say, I began “frictionmaxxing” by getting bits and bobs from my local store throughout the week rather than relying on an online order.

Advertisement

Not only did that mean I got to enjoy some of this month’s sunshine (finally!), but it also meant I felt much more connected to the world around me than I would otherwise.

I overheard some interesting arguments on the street and saw a terrible first date. I saw some very sweet goslings (picture above), noticed some heartening blossoms, and even got inspiration for an article about chocolate theft.

Since then, I’ve got my screen time down, begun reading more, and gotten back into crochet. I’ve even penned some letters and planned more IRL meetups.

Studies tell us that spending more time outdoors, having even surface-level interactions with other people, reading, and creating everything from meals to blankets, is good for us.

Advertisement

But I don’t think anyone who tries “frictionmaxxing” will need all that much proof. Already, I feel my self-esteem and sense of connection growing.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

LIVE: Spring Statement 2026

Published

on

LIVE: Spring Statement 2026

Guido will be live-blogging throughout, so refresh the page for the latest updates. Not a pretty economic picture as Reeves stands at the despatch box… 

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Kesha Blasts Donald Trump Administration For Using Her Song On Social Media

Published

on

Donald Trump pictured outside the White House last month

Kesha has taken aim at Donald Trump and his administration after the White House used her song in a video “to invite violence and threaten war”.

Last month, a video was uploaded to the official White House TikTok account soundtracked by Kesha’s hit Blow, depicting a jet launching a missile, which then destroys a ship.

Addressing her X followers on Monday night, the Grammy nominee wrote: “It’s come to my attention that The White House has used one of my songs on TikTok to incite violence and threaten war.

“Trying to make light of war is disgusting and inhumane. I absolutely do not approve of my music being used to promote violence of any kind.”

Advertisement

“Love always trumps hate,” Kesha continued. “Please love yourself and each other in times like this.

“This show of blatant disregard for human life and, quite frankly, this attack on all of our nervous systems is the opposite of what l stand for.”

She then turned her attention to the president, calling on fans not to “let this distract us” from the recent allegation that Donald Trump is mentioned in the unredacted Epstein files “more than a million times”.

The Trump administration’s director of communications Steven Cheung later reposted Kesha’s message, saying on his own X account: “All these ‘singers’ keep falling for this. This just gives us more attention and more view counts to our videos because people want to see what they’re bitching about.

Advertisement

“Thank you for your attention to this matter.”

Half an hour later, the Praying singer posted simply: “Stop using my music, perverts.”

Of course, Kesha is far from the first musician to call out Trump and his fellow right-wingers for using their music without permission.

Donald Trump pictured outside the White House last month
Donald Trump pictured outside the White House last month

“We demand that the amateurs in control of the ICE social media account take it down,” they wrote. “It ain’t funny, this song means a lot to us and other people, and you don’t get to appropriate it without a fight. Also, go fuck yourselves…”

Last year, chart-topper Jess Glynne and US singer-songwriter Sabrina Carpenter were irked to find their music being used in social media posts by the White House.

“This video is evil and disgusting. Do not ever involve me or my music to benefit your inhumane agenda,” Sabrina wrote, while Jess said: “This post honestly makes me sick. My music is about love, unity, and spreading positivity – never about division or hate.”

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Scream 7 Star Anna Camp Apologises For Controversial Boycott Repost

Published

on

Scream 7 Star Anna Camp Apologises For Controversial Boycott Repost

Scream 7 actor Anna Camp has apologised for resharing a post about the film’s release that she said did not “reflect” her “personal beliefs”.

Shortly after this, the film’s director parted ways with the project, as did Melissa’s co-star Jenna Ortega.

After the film hit cinemas, and it was reported to have made around $100 million in its opening weekend, cast member Anna reshared a post from X on her Instagram page, which read: “The boycott didn’t work, the critics’ hate didn’t work, the pathetic leaks didn’t work.

“What worked was audiences coming out and making the film a success.”

Advertisement

She accompanied this with a blast of Taylor Swift’s Karma.

However, after facing backlash, Anna removed the post and shared an apology.

It has come to my attention that I reposted someone else’s story that does not reflect my personal beliefs,” the Pitch Perfect star told her X followers. “I have since deleted the repost because I absolutely meant no harm.”

Anna added: “I’m sorry to anyone who was affected.”

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

anti-war protest in Belfast sees powerful speakers

Published

on

anti-war protest in Belfast sees powerful speakers

Around 250 people gathered outside Belfast’s City Hall on Monday March 2 to voice their disgust at the illegal aggression launched against Iran by US/Zionist terrorists. They were met by a much smaller crowd of around 30 people voicing their support for Reza Pahlavi. The man they are backing is the son of the Shah of Iran deposed in 1979 during the Iranian revolution.

He has bravely been willing to fight to the last drop of someone else’s blood from his home in the United States. Earlier this year he encouraged desperate young people to their death in protests met with brutal force by the theocrats in Tehran. Now he’s happy for his own people to be butchered again by the thugs in Washington and Tel Aviv. All this so he can regain the 1,648,195 kmof Iran he sees as his personal property, along with the 90 million people within it.

Monarchists back alternate form of tyranny

Supporters of Pahlavi at times waded into the crowd of anti-war demonstrators to try and instigate confrontation. Some of the former group brandished ‘Israeli’ flags and were met with shouts of “Zionist scum, off our streets”.

A slightly larger group of monarchists gathered at the same location on Sunday after the murder of Iran’s supreme leader Ayatollah Khamenei. Many held the flag of the Zionist entity on that occasion too, indicating they are also happy for ordinary Iranian people to be treated as expendable in the name of installing the self-appointed “Shah II”.

Advertisement

Gerry Carroll, West Belfast MLA for People Before Profit was the first speaker, successfully able to drown out interruptions from the monarchists. He started by denouncing the massacre of school children carried out by Zionist savages.

I don’t know anybody who claims they’re for freedom and democracy and human rights, but then cheer a school in Iran being blown to bits and at least 160 children being killed. In my eyes, in most people’s eyes across the world, that is not democracy, human rights and dignity. And we’re here to stand against that quite clearly and loudly.

He also called out the hypocrisy of the US demanding an end to Iran’s nuclear program:

The International Atomic Energy Authority…have said…that Iran is compliant when it comes to nuclear weapons. Now, I don’t think there should be any nuclear weapons across the world, but [we] must remind ourselves: who is the country, the only country in the world that has used nuclear weapons? I’ll give you a clue. This, the United States government, they have used it on the people of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

Never trust Zionists

Palestinian Mohammad Samana told the Pahlavi supporters backing so-called ‘Israel’ to beware, based on the bitter experience of his people:

For our friends, there protesting: nobody experienced ‘Israel’ as much as the Palestinians. They came to our land claiming being the victims. We welcomed them. And they took our land and created their apartheid state.

‘Israel’ told the world in 1993, that there will be a Palestinian state by 1998. But they used the agreement to steal more Palestinian land and ensured that they prevented the creation of a Palestinian state and colonised the West Bank and destroyed Gaza.

Advertisement

Crucially, Iranian Azedeh Sobout spoke too, saying:

I stand before you as an Iranian woman, one who opposes the men who rule my country now and the men who ruled it before. The current theocratic regime that massacred thousands of protesters in January and the monarchists backed up by U.S. standing at the other side. There is a space for people like me, [though] very little, in this current geopolitical script because we are constantly told that we must choose. Choose between a dictator and a bombing campaign. Choose between repression and destruction. Choose between submission and annihilation.

We reject that choice. This binary is false. It is coercive and it erases our political agency. It assumes that Iranians cannot imagine or build a future beyond the options imposed on us by empires and dictators. That logic is colonial. Their logic is colonial. That’s why they can only ally with the US, Israel and British colonial systems.

Regime change starts at home

She concluded:

Align your solidarity with our revolutionary philosophy: Jin, Jîyan, Azadî; woman, life, freedom. A vision rooted in Kurdish feminist struggle. A struggle [which] the monarchists are terrified of…because it’s based on feminist, working class resistance and democratic dignity.

And if you believe in regime change, begin it at home. Thank you.

Advertisement

Her last words are an essential message. We’re limited in the direct effect we can have on events thousands of miles away. What we can effect is that which happens right where we stand, in our own communities, town halls and parliaments. That means sweeping away any politician that shows the merest hint of sympathy towards the terrorist forces of the United States and so-called ‘Israel’.

Featured image via the Canary

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Green Party increasingly seen as opposition to Reform

Published

on

Green Party increasingly seen as opposition to Reform

A new YouGov poll has put the Green Party in second place, just two points behind Reform. This comes just after the Greens announced they have more than 200,000 members. And with Labour lagging five points behind Zack Polanski’s party, it seems voters now see the Greens as the main opposition to Reform.

Pollsters think the “seismic” Green by-election win on 27 February 2026, along with the public exposure surrounding it, has had a big influence on voter perceptions. In particular, it has shown the Green Party is a viable electoral choice which is fully capable of winning elections.

The result is the Greens’ highest with YouGov, and Labour’s lowest.

Despite Labour plummeting into the dustbin of history, however, Polanski has noted that Labour leader Keir Starmer is just doubling down on his failing strategy (which has already seen 25% of 2024 Labour voters go Green). And his tactics are continuing to backfire:

Times are changing, and the old order is dying

Sky News clarified that:

The Greens are now the most popular party in all age categories under 50.

Let’s emphasise that point again. *Every generation under the age of 50 prefers the Greens to any other party.* That includes almost 50% of 18-to-24-year-olds and 27% of people between the ages of 25 and 49.

Sky also reported that Greens are boosting their support levels in working-class communities, saying:

Advertisement

Those classified as doing “routine” jobs also vote Green in significant numbers.

The Green Party is now a mass party, not a niche one. And current polling already makes the potential electoral map look slightly more hopeful than it seemed a few months ago:

According to that projection, a far-right coalition of Reform and Tories would still win. But a centre-left coalition of the Greens, SNP, and Plaid Cymru would be hot on their heels. And if the centre-right Liberal Democrats preferred to back a Green-led coalition to stop the far right, the Reform-led coalition would lose.

Advertisement

As Polanski has emphasised, there is a massive section of society that clearly wants hope. These people want to stop the far right, get investment in their communities and public services, have lower bills, and protect the planet from the billionaire warmongers intent on destroying it:

The old order is rapidly fading away. Times are changing. And the Greens have placed themselves at the forefront of that struggle for a better country and a better world. There’s no hiding from that fact now, and Reform’s elitist hatemongers must be shaking in their jackboots.

Featured image via the Canary

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025