Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Politics

When Political Tribes Splinter | Iain Dale

Published

on

I understand why so many people are disillusioned with politics and politicians, but that being said, politics never fails to amaze, even if it doesn’t inspire. We live in an age of political fluidity, where party allegiances no longer mean an awful lot. Political parties have always been quote tribal. Many is the time I’ve knocked on a door to be told “We’re a Labour family. Always have been, always will be”, or “My Dad was a Conservative, so was his Dad, and so are we”. This is happening increasingly less as political barriers are broken down. You can date it back to 1970 when Margaret Thatcher offered traditional Labour voters the chance to buy their own council houses. This was psephologically transformative. As the years went on, Labour morphed from a party of the working classes to a party of middle class intellectuals. I exaggerate to make a point.

Margaret Thatcher made the Tory Party an acceptable home for previous Labour votes, just as Tony Blair created a New Labour narrative, which appealed to traditional centrist Conservatives. David Cameron did the same, with many Labour voters finding him a more appealing alternative to Gordon Brown. In more recent years, Boris Johnson attracted swathes of Brexit supporting Labour voters in 2019, who subsequently became disillusioned with his failure to deliver on his Levelling Up promises.

The thing is once you’ve voted against your traditional voting home once, it’s much easier to do it a second time. Parties now have to earn votes, rather than just rely on them. And when they fail to meet expectations, voters feel liberated to look elsewhere. This is what Keir Starmer is finding out at double quick speed. It’s something Rishi Sunak couldn’t fight against, because by the time he became prime minister voters had made up their mind that time was up for his party.

This is why the May elections are set to be the most exciting of recent decades, right across Great Britain. Traditional party allegiances will mean nothing. I predict that Wales is going to provide the biggest stories, with Scotland not being far behind. It is a shame – and a scandal – that local elections have been cancelled by the government in 29 areas across England, but it won’t save them from an electoral drubbing. The expectation is that the Conservatives will also have a terrible night, but I wonder if the growing reputation of Reform UK as being a home for failed Tories, might save a few Tory seats in some areas.

Advertisement

These elections also provide an opportunity for the LibDems and Greens to show us what they’re made of. My guess is that in England they will both make big progress.

But the big question is whether Reform can make a big breakthrough or will they flatter to deceive?

International affairs may be dominating, but domestically, our politics are certainly not going to be boring.

This article first appeared on my Substack. Subscribe HERE,

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Politics

Senior MP Delivers Brutal Reality Check To Trump As He Slates Nato

Published

on

Senior MP Delivers Brutal Reality Check To Trump As He Slates Nato

A senior MP has called out Donald Trump after he again accused Nato of not supporting the US in its time of need.

The US president has lambasted the defence alliance repeatedly as its member states have refused to get involved in his offensive action against Iran.

He has repeated his false claim that Nato has never been there for the US and threatened to pull out of the alliance altogether.

Actually, the only time the mutual defence clause of Article 5 has been activated was following the 9/11 attacks in New York.

Advertisement

Multiple countries, including the UK, sent troops to war in Afghanistan on America’s behalf for nearly 20 years.

So Tory MP Alicia Kearns, who sits as the shadow national security minister, nit out at the president on X.

She wrote: “As a British MP I can tell you what ‘showing up’ looks like.

“It looks like 457 British soldiers who died in Afghanistan.

Advertisement

“Nato has only ever gone to war for one country. Yours.

“The question isn’t whether Nato showed up, it’s whether we forgive you for pretending otherwise.”

Her remarks come after Trump provocatively claimed on Friday: “Nato made a terrible mistake when they wouldn’t send a small amount of military armaments, just even acknowledge what we were doing for the world taking on Iran.”

He continued: “I think a tremendous mistake was when Nato just wasn’t there. They just weren’t there.

Advertisement

“They take a lot of money from the United States.

We spend billions of dollars a year on Nato.

“Hundreds protecting them! We would have always been there for them.

“But, now, based on their actions, I guess we don’t have to be, do we?”

Advertisement

He added: “Why would we be there for them if they’re not there for us?”

As a British MP I can tell you what “showing up” looks like.

It looks like 457 British soldiers who died in Afghanistan.

NATO has only ever gone to war for one country. Yours.

The question isn’t whether NATO showed up, it’s whether we forgive you for pretending otherwise. https://t.co/tu5RAHzRdP

Advertisement

— Alicia Kearns MP (@aliciakearns) March 28, 2026

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

UK Adults Increasingly Spend On Ageing Parents

Published

on

UK Adults Increasingly Spend On Ageing Parents

Chances are you’ve heard of “the bank of mum and dad,” or adults relying on their parents for anything from house down-payments to holidays.

But the “reverse bank of mum and dad,” which sees adult children spending on their ageing parents, is a growing phenomenon, says James Mulvaney, Head of Digital at Clifton Private Finance.

Already, 55% of UK adults with living parents financially help, or expect to help, them in retirement. Only 45% of adults in midlife (45-54 years old) are optimistic about their parents’ finances, a figure that drops to 2% among 18-24-year-olds.

Why has the “bank of mum and dad” reversed?

Advertisement

“Several factors are driving this shift,” Mulvaney said.

“Rising care costs and the wider cost of living crisis have made retirement much more expensive, while many older homeowners are discovering that their pensions may not stretch as far as they once expected.”

Then, investment platform Ageon noted, there’s the fact that people are living longer lives. That means that savings, investments, and pensions may have to go further than expected.

“At the same time, families are recognising that housing decisions can play a major role in supporting older relatives,” Mulvaney added.

Advertisement

While the parents of over-50s may have benefited from lower house prices in their youth, parents of younger adults may have been part of a pricier housing market, which offers less return on investment.

Housing is the biggest source of household wealth in the UK (40%), followed by private pension wealth (35%).

“For many households, helping parents navigate retirement is becoming just as important as helping younger generations onto the property ladder,” said Mulvaney.

“And with housing playing such a central role in family finances, property is likely to remain at the heart of how families support one another for years to come.”

Advertisement

How can I prepare for these costs?

Mulvaney told us communication is key.

“One of the most effective steps you can take to help your older parents is reviewing their retirement finances together,” he shared.

That could involve reviewing their monthly outgoings, planning for care costs, and/or a simple budget.

Advertisement

It might also be worth discussing downsizing, which can “release equity from a larger home while also reducing maintenance costs and household bills”.

Lastly, Mulvaney said, “It’s also worth checking whether parents are claiming all the financial support they are entitled to. Recent DWP figures suggest almost one million pensioner households are missing out on an average of around £2,600 a year in Pension Credit, so checking eligibility can be one of the most valuable steps families take.

“Benefits such as Pension Credit, Housing Benefit, Council Tax Reduction, and Winter Fuel Payments can make a meaningful difference to retirees on lower incomes.”

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Minister Slams Questions About Morgan McSweeney Phone Saga

Published

on

Minister Slams Questions About Morgan McSweeney Phone Saga

Bridget Phillipson has claimed questions around the theft of Morgan McSweeney’s phone are drifting into “conspiracy theory territory”.

The cabinet minister was defending Keir Starmer’s former chief of staff as the government is facing further pressure to disclose all of its communications around Peter Mandelson’s appointment as ambassador to Washington.

McSweeney phoned the Metropolitan Police on October 20 last year to say his iPhone had been snatched out of his hand in Westminster.

In a transcript released by the police, McSweeney did not tell them who he was or why the phone contained highly-sensitive information.

Advertisement

He also mistakenly gave the call handler the wrong street name for where the theft took place.

The phone’s disappearance meant it was not possible to access any potential communications between the PM’s former top aide and his close friend Mandelson, who is in disgrace over his association with late paedophile Jeffrey Epstein.

The theft has triggered intense scrutiny across Westminster about the timing of events.

On Sky News, presenter Trevor Phillips asked Phillipson: “Why is Morgan McSweeney the only person in the modern world who doesn’t have his messages automatically backed up to the cloud so we could recover them and see what traffic there was between him and our former ambassador to the United States?”

Advertisement

Phillipson said the “question was a bit of a reach”, adding: “It’s hyperbole and you know it.”

Phillips insisted the question was “perfectly straightforward”, before asking if she backed up her own messages.

“I follow all of the guidance on what is required,” the minister said. “What happened here, which we all know, is that Morgan McSweeney was mugged, reported that to the police, followed all of the processes that was asked of him.

“I do think some of this wider coverage is drifting into conspiracy theory territory here.”

Advertisement

The presenter said he was not questioning any of that, but was “just wondering how it is this particular set of exchanges seems to be the only thing in the 21st Century that isn’t backed up somewhere”.

“Again, that’s hyperbole and you know it,” Phillipson said, visibly irritated. “Come on, to say he’s the ‘only person’ – it’s ridiculous and you know that.”

She said McSweeney is providing any material required, while the government “is complying with the humble address, providing information that isn’t needed, has been asked”.

“All ministers will also be complying with what is asked of us,” she added.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

The House | The government is realising the power to change the system lies in its own hands

Published

on

The government is realising the power to change the system lies in its own hands
The government is realising the power to change the system lies in its own hands

Cabinet Office Minister Nick Thomas-Symonds (Alamy)


4 min read

Initiatives from the Cabinet Office this week to cut “sludge” in government are not a plan for a rewired state – but they might be the start.

Advertisement

A spring clean is underway in Whitehall. A government press release on Thursday announced a set of measures intended to strip away bureaucracy and speed up decision-making, the start of a wider programme to cut the “sludge” that slows down the state.

We have, for some time now, been receiving different messages about process in government.

The first message is the vision: mission-led government was set to make Whitehall “decisive” and “innovative”, with a “productive and agile state” being the goal of the Prime Minister’s promise to “tear down the walls of Whitehall”.

Advertisement

The second is the frustration that more hasn’t happened on this front, with Keir Starmer last year criticising a “cottage industry of checkers and blockers” and then using his Liaison Committee appearance in December to lament the long delivery chain between lever and action.

In theory, the frustration should be fuel to realise the big vision. But, in practice, the two streams have felt oddly disconnected.

Ministers have continued to promise a more effective state, but rather than setting out a plan to get there, they seem to be more likely to throw their arms up in frustration that it doesn’t work. Then comes more vision, followed by more frustration, and the two feed off each other without making much difference to reality.

Advertisement

This week’s announcement, however, feels different.

We now have a list of things which the government is going to look at: reporting and consultation requirements, equalities impact assessments, environmental impact assessments, and the processes around collective cabinet agreement. Having a list is not radical, and nor are the items on this one. This list is, however, specific. It might not stir your heart, but effective reforms are in the detail, and in the hard work of changing that detail.

We also have the words of Attorney General Richard Hermer, writing in PoliticsHome earlier this week about the changes: “governing through the law does not mean blindly following endless procedures. Governing through the law means assessing these duties, asking whether they still serve us, and, where they don’t, changing them”. This is an explicit argument from Hermer that the government of the day has the power and the agency to change the system that so frustrates them.

What makes this announcement feel different is the specificity of the reforms, as well as the positive agency with which ministers are talking about the change. This is neither lashing out in frustration nor a big, bold vision. It has the texture of something that might just link the two.

Advertisement

This is obviously no finished product. The announcement includes vague plans to “take action” to ensure proportionality of equalities impact assessments, for example. Nor should it be seen as anything close to the scale of reform needed in the civil service and the wider state – it is focused on a very narrow slice of policy making and process.

But it is nevertheless a specific and positive start. The key thing now is to translate this into something that at least a core group of civil servants and ministers can feel is working, and to do so quickly. This means sustained effort to work through the detail of the duties and procedures that the government has identified, making changes where possible, and accepting the risks and downsides of those changes.

Ministers and civil servants will gain three clear wins if they succeed.

Improvements to the state, even if those are relatively minor. A cohort of leaders who really know they can change the system they work in, and the morale boost and sense of agency that comes from that success. And finally, a blueprint for the type of plans, detail and projects that provide the missing link between general frustration and big vision. That momentum and practice must then be taken to the wider work of state reform.

Advertisement

Hermer described himself and Cabinet Office Minister Nick Thomas-Symonds as being tasked with creating a “modern and agile” state, working alongside Cabinet Secretary Antonia Romeo, “whom the Prime Minister has tasked with rewiring the state to turbocharge delivery”. Those are in themselves empty and already tired phrases. The agile state was the Labour promise of 2024.

Romeo’s task is the same as her predecessor Chris Wormald’s, with the addition of “turbocharging delivery”. Both petered out because what they meant was never defined. This announcement is not that definition, and ministers and civil service leaders still urgently need to set out a proper plan for reform. But it is a genuine start, and one which holds the seeds of bigger change.

 

Hannah Keenan is an associate director at the Institute for Government

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

MP Says ‘We Must Act Against Those Who Seek To Divide Us’

Published

on

MP Says 'We Must Act Against Those Who Seek To Divide Us'

In every generation of British society, we have a responsibility to leave the next generation with a better world.

The 60s and 70s, under Harold Wilson’s government, saw Britain take decisive steps towards becoming a more open and equal society. Central to these changes was the decriminalisation of homosexuality, a landmark reform that helped lay the foundations for the rights many now take for granted.

The 80s through to the early 2000s brought fundamental questions about the role of the state in our communities across the four nations. Devolution sparked debate on whether Westminster should hold majority control over local communities in Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland, and we saw the creation of the Scottish Parliament and the Senedd in 1999. In London, we saw the Greater London Authority established – comprising the Mayor of London and the London Assembly Members, who play a crucial role to our Capital’s continued prosperity.

From the 2010s, we’ve shifted the conversation towards systemic injustices, fair policing and fairness of our institutions with respect to ethnic minority groups and the LGBT community. Here in the Cities of London and Westminster, a constituency with such historic ties to the LGBT community in Soho; home to London Pride, G-A-Y and the City of Quebec, we know the impact this has had. And we continue to welcome individuals from all over the world representing a wide range of backgrounds and religious beliefs into our community.

Advertisement

What underpins the issues that previous generations have responded to is the preservation of our liberal democracy. How do we define this? At its core, it is simple: the idea that we are all free to express our opinions, without fear of being targeted or harmed for doing so and that we all have the chance to vote for candidates who we believe best represent us, based on information available to us.

It has been covered at length that far-right rhetoric is once again finding its way into communities across the country. Many of these far right views are designed to incite division, spread hatred, and revive ideas that should have been rejected decades ago.

We have all discussed how to confront many of these views, and rightly so, but what tends to slip out of the conversation is the legal framework that governments can implement to actively defend and strengthen our democracy.

“Trust in politics, and crucially politicians, is at an all-time low.”

The Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government introducing the Representation of the People Bill before the House is not just another piece of legislation, it is a clear statement of intent. With the growing complexity of the current state of our society, there is a growing demand to reflect and reconsider how we reinvigorate democratic values within our grassroots. This Bill shows this government is prepared to act. Trust in politics, and crucially politicians, is at an all-time low. This Bill is an opportunity to begin rebuilding that trust, with measures including transparency over political donations, preventing foreign interference in our elections and stronger sanctions on serious malpractice.

Advertisement

We are extending the right to vote to 16- and 17-year-olds. For many young people, this is long overdue. This will be music to the ears of many sixth form and college students that I have been talking to across the Cities of London and Westminster. Many of whom remind me they can begin their first job, pay taxes into the state, or even enlist themselves into the army, but cannot yet make a decision on their futures.

We must also take on the challenge of donations in the form of crypto assets. There are no mechanisms in place to identify whether the sources of these donations are lawfully approved, due to the anonymity crypto provides.

And crucially, while current laws are designed to ensure transparency during the election, the government must consider the impact of undeclared political donations outside of the regulatory period. Influence is not limited to the campaign period, it is persistent and lacks the transparency necessary to regain public trust in our institutions.

The Representation of the People’s Bill is about more than process, it is about protecting our democracy, rooting out foreign interference and taking action against those who seek to divide us.

Advertisement

Future generations deserve to look back at this point in time as the moment we chose to act to protect and strengthen our democracy, not stand by while it was tested.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

The disturbed mind of the anti-Israel activist

Published

on

The disturbed mind of the anti-Israel activist

Anti-Semitic art exhibition this way’, announces a sign, held up by a cutesy self-drawn picture of the artist next to a bike. Follow it, and you’ll find that Matthew Collings’s new show in Margate stays true to its word.

Inside the gallery are hundreds of Collings’s furiously hatched colour-pencil drawings, all of them with some connection to Israel or Gaza. One shows Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu naked, with blood pouring from his mouth and hands, his cock erect, as he hypnotises the world. UK prime minister Keir Starmer is shown meekly taking orders from the Star of David. A pot-bellied and yellow-faced trio called ‘The Lobby’ – the Israeli or Jewish lobby, he presumably means – is sketched above the words, ‘They are nuts but utterly in control’. A scaly green lizard vomits blood with the slogan, ‘Stop Apartheid Demon’. A blood-stained Donald Trump is marked ‘Death’, ‘Epstein’ and ‘Israel’, and is surrounded by hollow-eyed monsters. The caption explains: ‘Trump thinks: “Hmm… Epstein… better invade Iran and murder Muslims”.’ The moment you walk into the gallery, you feel like you’re in that scene in a slasher film, when the victim stumbles into her kindly helper’s man-cave, only to discover his crazy, violent drawings that tell you he’s the villain.

You might have heard of Collings before. He was a critic before he was an artist (if you can really call him that), editing Artscribe magazine and presenting on BBC’s The Late Show in the 1990s. He wholeheartedly embraced the Young British Artists wave, writing Blimey! – From Bohemia to Britpop: London Art World From Francis Bacon to Damien Hirst. He went on to present This Is Modern Art on Channel 4. Collings, like so many tiresome critics, made a name for himself by praising modern art, claiming it to be too complex for the public to understand, while at the same time attacking the Old Masters who most people tend to like. All of this was done in a mockingly cynical manner. He would express his disapproval with a pretentiously raised eyebrow to the camera. It was all a bit glib.

Advertisement

Now that he’s moved from critic to artist, Collings seems to want his artworks to speak to what he considers profound, leading him to embrace the tragedy and horror of Gaza. Like many ageing Boomers, Collings has rediscovered the youthful radicalism he turned away from in his early career, largely with the help of the Palestinian cause. He has grown angrier and more certain in his beliefs, too. Even the grotesque pogrom of 7 October 2023 gave these artist-cum-activists no pause for thought. They had already decided that the Jews were the baddies and the Palestinians the long-suffering martyrs. So when Hamas’s thugs raped, slaughtered and kidnapped Israelis, all the pro-Gaza crowd saw was an act of righteous rebellion.

Collings’s turn from Britpop-loving centrist dad to an uncloseted Israelophobe took him into Jeremy Corbyn’s Labour Party, and then straight out again. He was adopted as the parliamentary candidate for South West Norfolk in 2019. Within a day of his selection, he was suspended from the party for having dismissed allegations of anti-Semitism in Labour as a ‘witch-hunt’, and for calling the late chief rabbi, Jonathan Sacks, a ‘hate-filled racist’. He also shared conspiratorial diagrams on social media, purporting to reveal the ‘influence’ of Jewish businessmen on British politics. That’s right – Collings took things too far, even for the Corbynistas.

Advertisement

Enjoying spiked?

Why not make an instant, one-off donation?

We are funded by you. Thank you!

Advertisement




Please wait…

Advertisement
Advertisement

The Margate exhibition is laughably titled Drawings Against Genocide. The artworks look childish and this is deliberate. Collings is trying to strip away all artifice to let the unalloyed feelings shine out. The trouble is that, in letting us see directly into his soul, what we see there is repulsive.

Collings would no doubt argue that his ‘art’ is in the tradition of the anti-Vietnam War art of the 1960s radicals, like Michael Sandle’s Mickey Mouse at the Machine Gun (1972) or Leon Golub’s paintings of torture and killing, even though his Margate show is entirely misanthropic and hate-filled.

Advertisement

Some have called for the exhibition to be banned, but that would be a mistake. On the contrary, Matthew Collings has done us a great service by showing us the disturbed mind of the anti-Israel activist. It is good that we all see the depravity that lies at the heart of this movement.

James Heartfield is the author of Britain’s Empires.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

JD Vance Responds To Joe Rogan Insulting MAGA ‘Dorks’

Published

on

JD Vance Responds To Joe Rogan Insulting MAGA 'Dorks'

Vice President JD Vance brushed off manosphere podcaster Joe Rogan’s comment about MAGA followers being “dorks.”

“It becomes a movement of a bunch of fucking dorks because a lot of them are dorks,” Rogan told guest Dave Smith on Thursday’s episode of his podcast. “A lot of them, these really weird, fuckin’ uninteresting, unintelligent people that have got something they cling to — and there’s a lot of people that are just real genuine patriots, and they’re all lumped into this one group and you got to accept the dorks, too? Fuck that!”

Vance dismissed Rogan’s comments in an interview with right-wing podcaster Benny Johnson that aired on Saturday.

Advertisement

“I think we have many, many fewer dorks than the far left, but everybody’s got some dorks. We love our dorks. We love our cool kids. We love anybody who wants to save the country,” Vance told the MAGA mouthpiece, who has been criticised online for being “cringe as fuck” and has referred to Trump as “Daddy.”

Benny Johnson: Joe Rogan says MAGA is full of dorks. What do you think? Do you consider yourself a dork?

JD Vance: Ha ha ha ha. I, uh, I think we have many, many fewer dorks than the far-left pic.twitter.com/kWuzy6iUoM

— FactPost (@factpostnews) March 27, 2026

The vice president also responded to Rogan’s suggestion that Hillary Clinton’s immigration stance made her “more MAGA than MAGA.”

Advertisement

“I did not see Joe say this. I’m going to text Joe, because that is that is definitely wrong,” Vance said.

Rogan’s criticism of MAGA comes amid an onslaught of White House social media posts that promote the administration’s agenda, particularly the war in Iran, through pop culture, sports, or video game references. A senior White House official called the posts “cringe” and embarrassing in an interview with MS Now published on Friday.

Vance himself has also faced cringe allegations, as has Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., whose workout video with Kid Rock was met with mockery.

Trump jokingly admitted at a Saudi-backed investment conference in Miami Friday that he that he likes to “hang around with losers.

Advertisement

Trump: I hang out with losers because it makes be feel better. I hate guys that are very, very successful and you have to listen to their success stories. I like people that like to listen to my success. pic.twitter.com/OYNXspphxo

— Acyn (@Acyn) March 27, 2026

“It’s a good thing to have a lot of losers. I always like to hang around with losers, actually, ’cause it makes me feel better,” Trump said. “I hate guys that are very, very successful and you have to listen to their success stories. I like people that like to listen to my success.”

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

US Taxpayers’ Tab For Trump’s Golf Habit Crosses $100 Million

Published

on

US Taxpayers’ Tab For Trump’s Golf Habit Crosses $100 Million

WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump’s golf habit has now cost US taxpayers at least $101.2 million in travel and security expenses since his return to office, a figure that is two-thirds of his first-term golf total and has him on track to spend $300 million by the end of his second term, according to a HuffPost analysis.

Trump’s arrival at his golf course in West Palm Beach, Florida, on Saturday morning marks his 56th visit there since his 2025 inauguration and his 110th day on a golf course that he owns — meaning he has played golf on more than one-quarter of his days since returning to the presidency.

“At a time when gas prices are spiking and Americans across the country find themselves in an ever-worsening affordability crisis, the president has burned through over $100 million in taxpayer money in order to make promotional appearances at his golf courses and hobnob with millionaires and billionaires,” said Jordan Libowitz with the Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington watchdog group. “If his goal were to help struggling Americans out, one thing he could try is stop spending their money going to his golf courses.”

Trump needed two full years to hit the $100 million mark in his first term, during which he played golf a total of 293 days at his own courses at a cost to taxpayers of $151.5 million. HuffPost has based its figures for transportation and security for Trump’s golf trips on a report to Congress during his first term in office.

Advertisement

In this second term, Trump has made 17 trips exclusively to his Mar-a-Lago country club home in Palm Beach, which is close to his courses in West Palm Beach and Jupiter. He has made seven more trips to Mar-a-Lago that included at least one additional stop. Last weekend, for example, Trump flew from Florida to Memphis for a speech before returning to Washington.

He has made eight trips to his course in Bedminster, New Jersey, at a cost of $1.1 million each and five to his resort in Doral, Florida, which cost $2.7 million each.

Of his regular golf destinations, Mar-a-Lago is by far the most expensive for him to visit, at $3.4 million a trip, because of the expense of patrolling both the Atlantic Ocean off the Palm Beach coast, as well as the Intracoastal Waterway that separates the barrier island from the mainland. When Trump is present, a Coast Guard ship is stationed offshore, and smaller law enforcement vessels with guns mounted on their bows are in the Intracoastal.

His most expensive trip to date has been the $9.7 million one he took to his resorts in Scotland last summer, which included participation in the grand opening of a new course at his Aberdeen property — an event for his for-profit business that the White House’s government staff helped promote.

Advertisement

In recent weeks, the White House has begun categorising Trump’s golf outings as “executive time.” That phrase also appears in his public schedule almost daily.

When asked if that means that Trump is participating in some form of leisure activity in each of those instances, the White House press office responded with the unsigned statement: “Executive time refers to executive time.”

HuffPost’s analysis uses methodology and figures from a 2019 Government Accountability Office report on Trump’s golf trips early in his first term. That report found that four trips to Mar-a-Lago in early 2017 cost taxpayers $13.6 million, and then broke down that total into components like additional security expenses, the costs to fly Air Force One, and the need to transport motorcade vehicles using expensive C-17 cargo planes.

In his second term, the major drivers of the high cost for the president’s hobby ― the flights on Air Force One, the need for the Air Force C-17 transports, the salaries for those protecting the president ― have not diminished. Indeed, they have likely increased.

Advertisement

Because the salaries for military service members and law enforcement officers generally have not kept pace with the consumer price index, HuffPost did not inflate the figures to current dollars. The actual costs and totals, nevertheless, are certainly higher than HuffPost’s unadjusted 2019 numbers.

Prior to his election in 2016, Trump spent years criticising former President Barack Obama’s golf outings, and during his first campaign, he promised he would be too busy to play golf. Then, following his 2020 election loss and failed coup attempt, Trump repeatedly criticised his successor, Joe Biden, for his frequent weekend trips to his home in Delaware.

But Obama’s taxpayer golf tab was a small fraction of Trump’s because Obama mainly played the course at Joint Base Andrews, a short motorcade ride from the White House. And Biden’s trips home used either the smaller version of Air Force One or a Marine One helicopter. Both cost far less to operate than the $273,063 per hour the GAO found it costs to fly the larger, modified Boeing 747 that Trump takes on his Florida golf trips.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Zendaya Teases Acting Break After String Of Movies And Shows

Published

on

Tom Holland and Zendaya first officially confirmed their relationship in 2021.

Zendaya has been on one hell of a run lately, with a line-up of five massive movie and TV releases coming out in 2026 alone.

However, she revealed earlier this week that she’s looking to make a major change next year.

In a recent with Fandango, the Emmy winner said she’s planning to take a much-needed break from Hollywood after being booked and busy in 2026, after appearing in the upcoming projects The Drama, Dune: Part Three, Spider-Man: Brand New Day, The Odyssey and the third season of Euphoria.

Zendaya claimed: “I’ll tell you what, after this, I’m disappearing for a little bit. I’m going to have to go into hiding for just a little bit.”

Advertisement

Joking that she hopes “people don’t get sick of me” after her stream of releases, she warmly thanked her fans for their continued support.

“I really appreciate everyone who supports any of the movies or supports my career in any kind of way. I’m deeply appreciative,” she added.

Zendaya’s fans don’t have to panic about her hiatus, though, because she is already set to return to the big screen in 2027 for Shrek 5, alongside returning cast members Mike Myers and Cameron Diaz.

The announcement about Zendaya’s impending intermission comes amid swirling rumours that she recently quietly tied the knot with her fiancé and Spider-Man co-star Tom Holland.

Advertisement
Tom Holland and Zendaya first officially confirmed their relationship in 2021.
Tom Holland and Zendaya first officially confirmed their relationship in 2021.

Kevin Winter via Getty Images

The gossip further erupted earlier this month after Zendaya was spotted wearing what appeared to be a wedding band on her left hand at the 2026 Oscars and Paris Fashion Week. Zendaya and Tom have reportedly been engaged since late 2024.

While the Marvel stars have neither directly addressed nor confirmed the rumours about their nuptials, the couple’s reps also didn’t immediately respond to HuffPost’s request for comment.

Appearing on Jimmy Kimmel Live! earlier this month, the US talk show host told Zendaya that “the internet has gone berserk with stories” about her possibly being married to Tom.

The actor cheekily responded with a smile: “Really? I haven’t seen any of that.”

Advertisement

Zendaya then addressed the faux AI images depicting her supposed wedding ceremony that have been making the rounds online in recent weeks.

“Many people have been fooled by them,” she told the comic. “While I was just out and about in real life and people are like, ‘Oh my God, your wedding photos are gorgeous,’ and I was like, ‘Babe, they’re AI. They’re not real.’”

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Something Very Bad Is Going To Happen Cast: Where You’ve Seen The Netflix Stars Before

Published

on

Camila Morrone as Roxana in season two of The Night Manager

Netflix’s new horror series Something Very Bad Is Going To Happen has already drawn comparisons to genre classics like Rosemary’s Baby and Carrie thanks to its nightmarish themes.

Created by Haley Z Boston, the writer of another Netflix horror Brand New Cherry Flavour, and produced by the Duffer Brothers (of Stranger Things fame), the series follows the unnerving events leading up to a young couple’s wedding.

If you’ve dared to watch it, you might have spotted one or two familiar faces among the cast. Wondering which of their past jaunts you’ve seen them in? Here’s a quick guide to where you could have spotted them before…

Camila Morrone

Advertisement
Camila Morrone as Roxana in season two of The Night Manager
Camila Morrone as Roxana in season two of The Night Manager

BBC/Ink Factory/Des Willie

You’re most likely to recognise Camila Morrone from her Emmy-nominated performance in the series Daisy Jones & The Six, where she played band photographer Camila Dunne, the wife of Sam Claflin’s character.

More recently, Camila appeared in the second series of The Night Manager as Colombian businesswoman Roxana Bolaños, a reluctant ally of Tom Hiddleston’s Jonathan Pine.

Over on the big screen, you might have seen her in the Eli Roth thriller Death Wish, Never Goin’ Back, Marmalade, Gonzo Girl or Mickey And The Bear.

Adam DiMarco

Advertisement
Adam DiMarco as Albie in the second season of The White Lotus
Adam DiMarco as Albie in the second season of The White Lotus

Adam DiMarco is best-known for playing the socially-awkward-yet-immensely-privileged Albie Di Grasso in The White Lotus’ second outing (yes, the Sicily season).

He currently stars as Peter in Prime Video college comedy series Overcompensating, and has also been seen in Pillow Talk, The Good Doctor, The Order, The Magicians and Charmed.

Gus Birney

Gus Birney as Mel in Netflix's Black Rabbit
Gus Birney as Mel in Netflix’s Black Rabbit

This isn’t Gus’ first foray into the horror world, as she’s probably most well-known for playing Gaynor opposite Courteney Cox in the comedy-horror series Shining Vale.

Gus has also appeared in Netflix’s 2025 miniseries Black Rabbit as hostess Mel, and had a recurring role in the Apple TV+ Dickinson, which stars Hailee Steinfeld as the writer Emily Dickinson.

You might have also caught her in The Last Frontier, The Blacklist, Insatiable or The Mist, as well as movies like I’m Thinking Of Ending Things, Plan B, Giving Birth To A Butterfly, Happiness For Beginners and Asleep In My Palm.

Advertisement

Karla Crome

Karla Crome as Jess in Misfits
Karla Crome as Jess in Misfits

British actor and writer Karla Crome is a regular on telly, following her major breakthrough in the E4 series Misfits, playing Jess in seasons four and five.

Since then, she’s gone on to appear in Lightfields, Prisoners’ Wives, The Level, You, Me And The Apocalypse, The Victim and Carnival Row.

She also played Lucy in Daisy May Cooper’s BBC series Am I Being Unreasonable?, as well as Pattie Walker in the much talked about Netflix show Toxic Town and Bella in Harlan Coben’s Lazarus.

Jeff Wilbusch

Advertisement
Jeff Wilbusch in the BBC drama The Little Drummer Girl
Jeff Wilbusch in the BBC drama The Little Drummer Girl

Jeff had his major breakthrough playing Moishe Lefkovitch in the Emmy-nominated Netflix miniseries Unorthodox.

You might have also seen him in Park Chan-wook’s acclaimed BBC spy series The Little Drummer Girl, which also starred Florence Pugh and Alexander Skarsgård.

He has also had roles in TV productions Oslo, Keep Breathing, The Calling, and in German horror film Dawn Breaks Behind the Eyes.

Jennifer Jason Leigh

Jennifer Jason Leigh in Quentin Tarantino's 2015 Western The Hateful Eight
Jennifer Jason Leigh in Quentin Tarantino’s 2015 Western The Hateful Eight

Andrew Cooper/The Weinstein Company/Kobal/Shutterstock

A fixture on our screens since the 1970s, Jennifer’s big break was in teen movie Fast Times At Ridgemont High.

Advertisement

She’s perhaps best known for her role in iconic ’90s thriller Single White Female, where she played the unhinged roommate Hedy opposite co-lead Bridget Fonda.

She later picked up a Golden Globe and Academy Award nomination for her depiction of fugitive “Crazy” Daisy Domergue in Quentin Tarantino’s The Hateful Eight.

You might have also seen her in many of the other projects in her vast filmography, which includes big hitters like Last Exit To Brooklyn, Miami Blues, The Machinist, Annihilation, Possessor, The Jacket, Synecdoche, New York, Margot At The Wedding and In The Cut.

TV fans will know Jennifer for her playing Elsa in Netflix comedy Atypical, as well as roles in Fargo, Weeds, Revenge, Twin Peaks: The Return, Patrick Melrose, The Affair, Lisey’s Story and Hunters.

Advertisement

Ted Levine

Ted Levine as Buffalo Bill in The Silence Of The Lambs
Ted Levine as Buffalo Bill in The Silence Of The Lambs

Ken Regan/Orion/Kobal/Shutterstock

Ted Levine has a certain knack for roles that make your blood run cold, and is most famous for playing serial killer Buffalo Bill in everyone’s favourite cannibal film The Silence Of The Lambs.

He’s also appeared in Heat, Shutter Island, The Hills Have Eyes, Memoirs Of A Geisha, American Gangster and The Report, balancing it out with roles in lighter titles like Flubber, Jurassic Park: Fallen World and The Fast And The Furious.

Ted is also a big name in TV, and you might know him for playing Leland Stottlemeyer in 2000s show Monk or for his appearances in Ray Donovan, Wonderland, Luck, The Bridge, Mad Dogs, The Alienist and Mayfair Witches.

Advertisement

Zlatko Burić

Zlatko Burić in Wonder Man
Zlatko Burić in Wonder Man

Croatian-Danish actor Zlatko is most recognisable for playing Russian oligarch Dimitry in the dark comedy Triangle of Sadness.

You might have also seen him in films like The Bride, 2012, Wolfs, Rumours, Mayday, Bleeder, 2025’s Superman and the Pusher trilogy.

Zlatko is less well-known for his TV work, but you might still recognise him from Wonder Man, Copenhagen Cowboy, Snatch or 1864.

Sawyer Fraser

Advertisement
Sawyer Fraser as Nico, a child with cancer, in The Good Doctor
Sawyer Fraser as Nico, a child with cancer, in The Good Doctor

Jeff Weddell via ABC via Getty Images

What with being a child, Sawyer doesn’t have too many roles under his belt just yet.

However you might have spotted him in medical drama The Good Doctor, after it gained a new audience when it was added to Netflix at the start of the year.

All eight episodes of Something Very Bad Is Going To Happen are now streaming on Netflix.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025