Business
Can ASEAN Stop Competing Against Itself?
Across Southeast Asia, a high-stakes competition for artificial intelligence supremacy is intensifying, and regional leaders worry it could undermine their collective future.
Key takeaways
- ASEAN member states are competing against each other for AI investment through divergent strategies – Malaysia offers 0% tax rates, Indonesia prioritizes digital sovereignty with local language models, and Thailand leverages energy diplomacy.
- The Digital Economy Framework Agreement (DEFA), expected in 2026, could unlock a $2 trillion digital economy by 2030 – but only if member states shift from zero-sum rivalry to functional specialization as an integrated value chain.
- ASEAN’s strategic advantage lies in becoming a neutral digital hub where U.S. and Chinese tech ecosystems coexist under regional protocols – evidenced by payment interoperability already working across Indonesia, Thailand, Malaysia, Singapore, and the Philippines.
ASEAN’s 10 member states are deploying starkly different strategies to capture global tech investment. Malaysia offers corporate income tax rates as low as 0% in special economic zones like the Johor-Singapore Special Economic Zone (JS-SEZ), attracting hyperscalers priced out of Singapore.
The Malaysia Data Center Market is projected to grow from $6.14 billion in 2025 to $11.40 billion by 2031.
“Indonesia has chosen digital sovereignty over infrastructure. NVIDIA’s investment in Solo through Indosat’s Sahabat-AI initiative aims to build large language models in Bahasa Indonesia, trained on local data and cultural contexts. “
Indonesia is not content to be a server farm,” explained Dr. Maya Indrawati, a digital policy analyst in Jakarta. “They want to refine intelligence, not just rent infrastructure.”
Thailand leverages energy diplomacy, offering a green utility tariff guaranteeing long-term, low-cost renewable electricity for data centers. Prime Minister Srettha Thavisin has personally courted tech leaders, including NVIDIA’s Jensen Huang and Apple’s Tim Cook.
These competing strategies reveal a dangerous dynamic: ASEAN is fragmenting precisely when it should consolidate. “The risk isn’t external competition,” warned former Singapore diplomat Bilahari Kausikan. “It’s ASEAN competing against itself and losing the sovereign capacity to shape AI governance, ethics, and interoperability standards.”
The stakes are quantifiable. ASEAN Secretariat projections suggest the region’s digital economy could reach $2 trillion by 2030 if the Digital Economy Framework Agreement (DEFA), expected to be signed in 2026, is fully implemented.
DEFA aims to transform ASEAN from 10 competing destinations into one integrated digital value chain through functional specialization: Indonesia as the innovation testbed, Singapore as the governance laboratory, Malaysia providing semiconductor infrastructure, Thailand as the logistics gateway, and Vietnam anchoring hardware manufacturing.
Real coordination already exists at the street level. Indonesian QRIS payment codes work seamlessly in Thailand, Malaysia, Singapore, and the Philippines, demonstrating regional interoperability that policymakers have yet to scale.
According to Lenovo research, 96% of Asia-Pacific enterprises are increasing AI investments in 2026, with Singapore leading at $68 per capita.
The fundamental question confronting ASEAN is whether the region can shift from asking “who wins?” to “what can we become together?” As DEFA negotiations continue through 2026, that question will determine whether Southeast Asia emerges as a coherent digital power or fractures into rival tech hubs competing for scraps from Beijing and Silicon Valley.
