Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Tech

Grammarly’s ‘expert review’ is just missing the actual experts

Published

on

A recently-added feature in Grammarly purports to improve users’ writing with help from the world’s great writers and thinkers — and some tech journalists, too.

Launched in August 2025 as part of a broader set of AI-powered features, Expert Review appears in the sidebar of Grammarly’s main writing assistant, allowing users to bring up revision suggestions “from the perspective” of subject matter experts.

Wired noted that this Grammarly frames this feedback as if it was coming from well-known authors, whether they’re living or dead. In some cases, according to The Verge, it can even appear to come from tech journalists at The Verge, Wired, Bloomberg, The New York Times, and other publications.

Of course, I couldn’t help but wonder: What about TechCrunch? I copy-pasted an early draft of this post into Grammarly in the hopes that that I might see some tips from my TC colleagues, but I was instead told to add ethical context like Casey Newton, “leverage the anecdote for reader alignment” like Kara Swisher, and “pose the bigger accountability question” like Timnit Gebru.

Advertisement

Which was all rather disappointing: Yes, the feature seems ill-conceived, but if all those other pubs are going to get mentioned, then what are we doing wrong?

Anyway, to state the obvious, none of these figures appear to be involved in Expert Reviews or to have given Grammarly permission to use their names. Alex Gay, vice president of product and corporate marketing at Grammarly’s parent company Superhuman, told The Verge that these experts are mentioned “because their published works are publicly available and widely cited.”

And in its user guide to the feature, Grammarly says, “References to experts in Expert Review are for informational purposes only and do not indicate any affiliation with Grammarly or endorsement by those individuals or entities.”

Techcrunch event

Advertisement

San Francisco, CA
|
October 13-15, 2026

Which is reasonably clear, I guess. But it raises the question: In what sense is Grammarly actually providing an “expert review”? Perhaps none at all, as historian C.E. Aubin told Wired: “These are not expert reviews, because there are no ‘experts’ involved in producing them.”

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Tech

This Android phone can run Windows games locally, no PC required

Published

on


In a recent video, creator ETA Prime showcases Red Magic’s phone running multiple Windows games directly on Android. The device is powered by a Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 SoC, paired with 24GB of LPDDR5T memory and 1TB of UFS 4.1 Pro storage.
Read Entire Article
Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Samsung will discontinue its Messages app in July and replace it with Google’s

Published

on

Samsung is putting the final nail in the coffin for its own messaging app. The smartphone maker posted an “End of Service Announcement” on its website, revealing that the Samsung Messages app will no longer be available by July of this year. Samsung also recommended that anyone still using Samsung Messages switch over to Google Messages as the default messaging app.

For Samsung Messages users in the US, the switch to Google offers RCS messaging that lets you send high-quality media, join group chats and get real-time typing indicators no matter the smartphone’s OS. Galaxy smartphone owners may lose out on some of the Samsung Messages customization options, but Google Messages will make up for it generative AI from Gemini that can remix your photos in chats. On top of those features, Google Messages makes it easier for Samsung users to switch chats between a smartphone, tablet or smartwatch.

It’s no surprise that Samsung is only using Google Messages from now on, since it has been phasing out Samsung Messages for a few years now. Dating back to the Galaxy Z Fold 6 and Flip 6, and then followed by the Galaxy S25 series, Samsung stopped preloading the Samsung Messages app and instead pre-installed the Google Messages app. The Samsung Messages app is still available on the Galaxy Store, but Samsung said the exact final date will eventually be announced on the app itself.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Monzo quits the US to focus on Europe ahead of a London IPO

Published

on

In short: Monzo announced on 1 April 2026 that it is closing its US operations, stopping new American sign-ups immediately and shutting existing accounts by June, and cutting approximately 50 roles. The decision comes three months after the UK challenger bank received a full banking licence from the European Central Bank and the Central Bank of Ireland, opening up expansion across the EU. It also arrives as Monzo prepares for a London IPO that Morgan Stanley is advising on, with a target valuation of between £6 billion and £7 billion.

Monzo is leaving the United States. The UK challenger bank announced on 1 April 2026 that it would cease accepting new American customers immediately, cut approximately 50 US-based roles, and close all existing American accounts by June. In a statement, the company framed the decision as a deliberate reorientation rather than a retreat: “With a fast-growing customer base of 15 million in the UK and the growth opportunity our European banking licence creates, we’re making a deliberate, strategic decision to focus on scaling in our home market and Europe and to step away from the US.” The announcement ends a seven-year experiment that never fully resolved its central structural problem, Monzo could not get a banking licence in the US, and without one, it could not compete.

Seven years, no charter

Monzo announced its American expansion in June 2019, rolling out a simplified version of its app to US customers and partnering with Sutton Bank, an Ohio-based FDIC-insured institution, to hold customer deposits and issue debit cards. The arrangement was always a workaround: without its own banking charter, Monzo could not originate loans, access core payment infrastructure directly, or compete in the lending and interchange revenue streams that define US retail banking profitability. It filed an application with the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency for a national bank charter in April 2020, but withdrew the application in late 2021 after regulators signalled it would not be approved. The company faced opposition from the National Community Reinvestment Coalition, among others, which argued that Monzo had not demonstrated sufficient commitment to serving local community needs. After withdrawing the OCC application, Monzo continued operating in the US through partner institutions, but it never secured the infrastructure that would have made its American business structurally viable.

The result, after seven years, was a product that offered a digital current account but not the full-service banking relationship that Monzo had built in the UK. US customers could not access mortgages, personal loans, or the premium credit products that generate meaningful revenue. They had a sophisticated spending tracker and a card linked to a partner bank’s balance sheet. That is a reasonable travel companion. It is not a challenger bank.

Advertisement

The European licence that changed the calculation

On 17 December 2025, the European Central Bank and the Central Bank of Ireland granted Monzo a full banking licence, making it the first digital bank to be fully regulated by the Central Bank of Ireland and establishing Dublin as its European headquarters. The licence unlocks what the OCC application never delivered: the right to hold customer deposits directly, originate loans, and operate as a full bank across the 27-member EU single market under the EU’s passporting regime. Europe’s appetite for homegrown technology champions in financial services has grown considerably in recent years, and Monzo’s Irish licence positions it to compete for that opportunity on equal terms with incumbent banks for the first time. The three months between the Dublin licence and the US exit announcement are not coincidental. The company now has a credible path to scaled profitability in a market where it is already the dominant challenger; the US, by contrast, remained a market where it was permanently constrained.

The 💜 of EU tech

The latest rumblings from the EU tech scene, a story from our wise ol’ founder Boris, and some questionable AI art. It’s free, every week, in your inbox. Sign up now!

An IPO in the background

The withdrawal also has a more immediate audience: the investors Monzo is courting ahead of a public listing. The company has appointed Morgan Stanley to advise on a London Stock Exchange IPO that is expected in 2026, with a target valuation of between £6 billion and £7 billion — compared with the $5.9 billion implied by a secondary share sale in October 2024. Companies preparing for public listings in 2026 have generally found that a clean, focused growth story commands a higher multiple than a sprawling international footprint with mixed results, and a US operation that could not clear its structural barriers was a complication the IPO story did not need.

Advertisement

The listing has already generated internal turbulence. TS Anil, who served as Monzo’s CEO for five years, stepped down in February 2026 following a reported dispute with the board over the timing and location of the IPO. Anil is understood to have favoured an earlier listing and had expressed interest in a New York venue; the board opted for London and more time. Diana Layfield, who spent nearly a decade at Google and more than a decade at Standard Chartered, was named his successor in October 2025 and took the role subject to regulatory approvals. Her mandate is the European expansion and the public listing. The US exit is the first visible act of that mandate.

The numbers behind the decision

Monzo’s financial trajectory gives the pivot a logic that is easier to explain to prospective public market investors than to American customers receiving account-closure notices. For the financial year ending March 2025, the bank reported revenue of £1.24 billion, up 48% year on year. Adjusted pre-tax profit reached £113.9 million, an eightfold increase on the prior year. Customer deposits grew 48% to £16.6 billion. A year that saw digital banking’s growth trajectory sharpen considerably across European markets validated the core bet: that a mobile-first bank with no branch network could generate the kind of revenue and profit that commands a credible IPO valuation. The US, in that context, was consuming resources that could instead be deployed against a market where the regulatory framework and customer base are already in place.

The subscription and premium-tier model that has driven platform revenue growth across technology is central to how Monzo has reached profitability in the UK: Monzo Plus and Monzo Premium accounts charge monthly fees and bundle benefits including travel insurance, higher interest rates on savings, and cashback. Replicating that model in the US required a depth of product, overdrafts, credit, savings, that a partner-bank structure made impossible. In the UK and, increasingly, in Europe, Monzo can offer all of it.

The broader picture

The move leaves the US challenger banking market increasingly to domestic incumbents and to a handful of well-capitalised European fintechs that have managed to secure their own charters. Revolut, Monzo’s nearest European rival, has been pursuing a US banking licence since 2021 and has yet to obtain one. The structural barriers that defeated Monzo’s OCC application remain in place. The lesson emerging from several high-profile European technology companies is that the conviction to double down on home-market strength, rather than spreading capital across geographies where the terms are unfavourable, is increasingly what investors reward. Monzo’s board, in pushing for a London listing and a European expansion over an American one, appears to have reached the same conclusion.

Advertisement

For American customers, the practical consequence is a June 2026 account closure. Monzo said it would provide guidance in the coming days on how to transfer funds, redirect direct deposits, and access statements after the accounts are closed. For Monzo itself, the US chapter closes with a banking licence in Dublin, a public listing in preparation, and 15 million customers in the UK who collectively generated more than a billion pounds in revenue in a single year. The experiment in America is over. The business case for ending it is not difficult to read.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

‘Marshals’ Release Schedule: When Episode 6 Hits Paramount Plus

Published

on

Marshals, a new Yellowstone spinoff starring Luke Grimes as Kayce Dutton, is airing on CBS right now. You can also tune in with Paramount Plus. The Yellowstone sequel series sees Grimes’ former Navy SEAL join an elite unit of US Marshals to bring range justice to Montana, according to a synopsis from CBS.

The show includes Yellowstone actors Gil Birmingham as Thomas Rainwater, Mo Brings Plenty as Mo and Brecken Merrill as Tate. Spencer Hudnut is the showrunner of Marshals — formerly known as Y: Marshals — and Taylor Sheridan is an executive producer.

Advertisement

When to watch new Marshals episodes on Paramount Plus

Episode 6 of Marshals airs on CBS on Sunday, April 5. Viewing options for Paramount Plus customers vary by subscription tier. You can watch the episode live if you have Paramount Plus Premium, which includes your local CBS station. If you subscribe to Paramount Plus Essential, you can watch the installment on demand the following Monday, but not live on Sunday.

Here’s a release schedule for the next three episodes of Marshals.

  • Episode 6, Out of the Shadows: Premieres on CBS/Paramount Plus Premium on April 5 at 8 p.m. ET/8 p.m. PT/7 p.m. CT. Streams on Paramount Plus Essential on April 6.
  • Episode 7, Family Business: Premieres on CBS/Paramount Plus Premium on April 12 at 8 p.m. ET/8 p.m. PT/7 p.m. CT. Streams on Paramount Plus Essential on April 13.
  • Episode 8, Blowback: Premieres on CBS/Paramount Plus Premium on April 19 at 8 p.m. ET/8 p.m. PT/7 p.m. CT. Streams on Paramount Plus Essential on April 20.

You can also watch CBS and the sixth episode of Marshals without cable with a live TV streaming service such as YouTube TV, Hulu Plus Live TV or the DirecTV MyNews skinny bundle. In addition to offering a lower-cost option, Paramount Plus lets you watch the other two Yellowstone spinoffs: the prequels 1883 and 1923.

Advertisement

James Martin/CNET

After a price increase in early 2026, the ad-supported Essential version runs $9 per month or $90 per year. The ad-free Premium version runs $14 per month or $140 per year. Paying more for Premium gives you downloads, the ability to watch more Showtime programming than Essential and access to your live, local CBS station.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

This little-known Abuja factory is pumping out thousands of drones while copying Apple’s playbook in an unexpected security shift

Published

on


  • Terra Industries scales drone production to provide security for power plants, mines, and refineries
  • Local manufacturing cuts costs while raising new questions about production sustainability
  • Annual subscriptions introduce financial risk for clients in unstable economic environments

A Nigerian robotics startup is building thousands of drones each year to protect critical infrastructure across Africa.

It is applying a vertically integrated manufacturing strategy that draws inspiration from Apple rather than traditional defense contractors.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Nvidia shows neural compression can cut VRAM usage from 6.5GB to 970MB

Published

on


Consider Nvidia’s work on Neural Texture Compression (NTC). In its “Tuscan Wheels” demo, the company showed VRAM usage dropping from roughly 6.5GB with traditional BCN-compressed textures to 970MB using NTC, while keeping image quality close to the original.
Read Entire Article
Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

With One Million Displaced, Lebanon Turns to Digital Wallets for Aid

Published

on

Since March, Israeli attacks on Beirut and the occupation of southern Lebanon have displaced over 1 million people. Families are sheltering with relatives, renting if they can, or sleeping in cars and out in the open, placing immense strain on already fragile infrastructure. Over 130,000 people have also crossed into Syria, many in urgent need of food, cash assistance, and shelter, according to a report by the International Organization for Migration.

As humanitarian needs surge, so does the flow of money from abroad. Yet much of this support is not moving through traditional aid channels. Instead, it is being routed through digital fintech platforms to trusted individuals on the ground, who buy necessary items or distribute funds directly to the displaced.

There is no real-time dataset capturing donations linked specifically to the war. However, remittances—the closest available proxy—offer context. Lebanon receives roughly $6 billion to $7 billion annually from abroad, equivalent to about a third of its GDP, according to the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) in 2023.

The UNDP reported that remittance costs there averaged 11 percent, higher than the global average. In times of crisis, these flows often shift towards emergency support. What is different now is how that money moves: Increasingly, it is being sent instantly, peer-to-peer, through digital wallets.

Advertisement

“These informal inflows are captured by the formal BDL figures and constitute around 70 percent of the inflows during the crisis,” the UNDP added, noting that money is also often sent as cash with people traveling to the country.

From Gift Cards to Financial Infrastructure

Being Lebanese myself, my social media feed has been inundated with former colleagues and friends setting up their channels to receive donations, sharing photos of receipts, and showing where money is going.

One grass-roots campaign run by Lebanese lawyer Jad Essayli raised $65,125 in 10 days, purely through social media and digital transfers. When asked which platforms have been the most impactful, he and other fundraisers pointed to Whish Money, though many other platforms, including Paypal, Zelle, and Venmo are also being used.

Originally launched to digitize gift cards, the company has evolved into a broad financial platform offering remittances, peer-to-peer transfers, and payment services with more than 2 million users across 110 countries. “We started off from the fact that we wanted to disrupt the distribution of gift cards,” says Toufic Koussa, cofounder and chairman of Whish Money, describing how the company built an early wallet system in 2007 that allowed retailers to issue digital cards on demand. Over time, that infrastructure expanded into a full financial ecosystem.

Advertisement

When Banks Stop Working

The company’s core focus has been the unbanked and underbanked—those with limited or unreliable access to traditional banking. Those groups became central during Lebanon’s financial collapse. Globally, 1.4 billion people remain unbanked; the World Bank cites access to affordable financial services as being “critical for poverty reduction and economic growth.”

In Lebanon, as banks froze deposits and restricted withdrawals, platforms like Whish Money filled a critical gap, enabling people to move and access money outside the traditional system.

That infrastructure now shapes how aid moves in crisis. Money from family, diaspora, or grass-roots campaigns lands straight in a digital wallet and can be spent immediately. On Whish Money, peer-to-peer transfers are the most popular, followed by international remittances. Koussa also notes that Whish Money is uniquely connected to US banking infrastructure, allowing users to link accounts abroad directly to wallets in Lebanon.

Displacement is changing how people use these platforms. Overall growth is steady, but transaction patterns have shifted. Families are making bigger purchases, stocking up on essentials as uncertainty grows. Grocery bills that might have been $200 are now climbing as people prepare for the worst, Koussa says.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Garmin x Natural Cycles could be a big step forward for women’s health

Published

on

Natural Cycles, the only FDA- approved contraceptive and fertility tracking app will now be integrated into select Garmin watches. This is an intriguing step forward for women’s health, as it could allow for more insight into individual cycles.

Compatible Garmin wearables, including many we’ve hailed as being among the best smartwatches, will now include the Natural Cycles app with either a monthly or annual subscription. 

In case you’re unaware, Natural Cycles is a smartphone app that tracks your temperature throughout your cycle and shows you when you’re at your most fertile point. That means you can use Natural Cycles as an alternative to more “traditional” contraceptives like the pill or the coil, or you can use the app as a method to plan pregnancy. 

Previously, you’d have to use either Natural Cycles’ own NC band, a compatible Oura Ring or Apple Watch to track your temperature. Now, those sporting a compatible Garmin watch can benefit too.

Advertisement
Garmin x Natural CyclesGarmin x Natural Cycles

Advertisement

Natural Cycles’ integration with Garmin could be a huge leap for cycle tracking. While many of the best wearables do offer some cycle tracking, personally I find it difficult to find one that’s actually insightful. Plus, those on a controlled cycle (say if you’re on the pill) will likely find that wearables seem to almost guess what’s going on with their body.

As reported in a 2025 study, although “general biometric wearables, such as smartwatches and fitness trackers” do provide useful data, it’s thought they “fail to capture the complexity of menstrual cycles, hormone therapies and their physiological implications”. 

I’d agree with this as I wear a Whoop MG and, although it’s undeniably great at tracking my (occasional) workouts and sleep, I wouldn’t necessarily rely on it for anything to do with my cycle tracking. 

Sure, it offers somewhat of an overview, and allows me to log my periods and symptoms via the journal, but I find Whoop tends to automatically list general behaviour as a symptom of my cycle. For example, if I record that I’m feeling nervous: that’s PMS. Had disrupted sleep? Classic PMS sign right there (or was it actually because my phone went off after I failed to put it on do not disturb and woke me up? We’ll never know.) 

Advertisement

Garmin and Natural Cycles

So, how will Garmin and Natural Cycles be any different? Well, a compatible Garmin will track your skin temperature during sleep, with the information then relayed to you via the Natural Cycles app. From here, you can see your fertile days — based purely on your own metrics rather than it being based on a “standard” 28-day cycle or relying on you, the user, to track your periods accurately. 

Advertisement

According to Natural Cycles, tracking your cycle with its app will offer you up to 93% effectiveness, which is the same as the contraceptive pill. This stat will likely impress those who have previously taken the contraceptive pill and experienced many unwanted side effects, including mood swings, acne and weight changes too. That’s a pretty common occurrence for those on the pill, with controlled studies reporting nearly 50% of those observed reporting side effects. Not only that, but just open up the accompanying leaflet in a box of one of the mainstream pills and you’ll be greeted with an unpleasant array of side effects that may or may not affect you.

Garmin and Natural Cycles appGarmin and Natural Cycles app

If you don’t want to risk experiencing any side effects, but want to avoid pregnancy, you’d be forced to avoid hormonal methods like the contraceptive pill and instead opt for either less reliable birth control methods or even have to endure an invasive and painful procedure instead. It undoubtedly feels like a lose/lose situation. 

With this in mind, tools like Natural Cycles within Garmin offer a welcome alternative to traditional birth control methods.

Advertisement

However, all of this isn’t to say that anyone who wants to either prevent or plan a pregnancy should just opt for a Garmin smartwatch and Natural Cycles. Instead, this partnership is ideal for those who either want to move away from traditional and hormonal methods of birth control but still want control over their bodies.

While we still have a huge way to go, I’m quietly optimistic about this milestone and would be keen to try it myself.

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

T.H.E. Show Vegas 2026: Best in Show Winners and Honorable Mentions

Published

on

T.H.E. Show returned to the Alexis Park Hotel in Las Vegas from March 20 to 22, 2026, marking its 30th anniversary right where it started. As North America’s longest running hi-fi show, its survival is not luck. It is persistence. Credit goes to the late Richard Beers for building it, Maurice Jung for keeping it alive after 2016, and now Emiko Carlin, who is steering the brand into its next phase with expanded events in Austin and New York City. The show had moved from Las Vegas to Southern California with stops in Newport Beach, Irvine, Long Beach, and now Costa Mesa, but it is still standing. That alone says something in an industry that tends to burn through its own history.

Context matters, and 2026 is shaping up to be one of the busiest show calendars this industry has ever seen. Between eight CanJam events, AXPONA, CES, ISE, NAMM Show, CEDIA Expo, the relocated Vienna based HIGH END, and a growing list of shows in Toronto, Paris, Singapore, SWAF, and CAF, it is relentless. There is barely time to unpack before the next badge gets printed.

Which makes T.H.E. Show’s return to Las Vegas feel less like nostalgia and more like defiance. Thirty years in, it is still in the fight.

alexis-park-resort-hotel-sign-2025-03-21

With four events on the T.H.E. calendar in 2026, the Vegas stop did not exactly start on solid footing. The show was originally scheduled for January 9 to 11 at the Tuscany Suites & Casino, but had to be postponed to March due to unforeseen issues with the venue. Credit where it’s due, the team managed to regroup and secure the Alexis Park Hotel in less than three months. That kind of turnaround is not easy in Las Vegas, where convention space gets locked up fast.

There were tradeoffs. The new dates could not accommodate every exhibitor, and the show ended up noticeably smaller than originally planned. In total, eight oversized ballrooms were filled with high-end audio systems, supported by a modest marketplace that included T10 Bespoke, Island Routers, a vinyl seller, and a portable audio accessories vendor. It felt more curated by necessity than design.

Advertisement

Timing did not help either. Running the same weekend as the Montreal Audiofest split both exhibitors and attendees across two countries that are not exactly a quick plane ride apart. Add AXPONA 2026 looming just weeks later, with the eCoustics team heading to Chicago that same week, and the reality sets in. There is only so much travel budget and bandwidth to go around, even in an industry that seems determined to test both in 2026.

Best in Show


Best Over $50K: YG Acoustics / Bergmann

yg-acoustics-vantage-3-live-vegas-2026

I’ve heard a number of YG Acoustics systems at shows over the years, and they rarely miss. This time, instead of rolling in with something that costs as much as a brownstone, they kept it almost reasonable. Almost. The Vegas system (presented by Supreme Acoustic Systems) came in around $100K and centered on the Vantage 3 Live active towers at $73K per pair, paired with a Bergmann Magne Airbearing Turntable at $12K, all sitting on a Music Tools ISOstatic rack at $1,495 per level.

The setup was refreshingly clean. No spaghetti pile of cables, no rack full of separates. Just two power cords and a pair of optical cables, one feeding each speaker. That alone tells you this is not your typical active speaker. The Vantage 3 Live uses a fully integrated DSP architecture with an external control unit that handles preamp duties and includes a phono stage. Everything is managed upstream, then sent digitally to the speakers.

The key here is that the signal stays in the digital domain all the way to the speakers, or is converted to digital before it gets there. That is why YG uses optical connections instead of traditional speaker cables. It is a different way of thinking about system design, and it cuts out a lot of variables.

There is no Bluetooth or Wi-Fi, but Ethernet based network streaming is built in, with support for TIDAL Connect and Qobuz Connect, and optional Roon integration. Use your phone or tablet, hit play, and let the system do the rest. No clutter, no guesswork, and very little standing between you and the music.

Advertisement
Bergmann Magne Airbearing Turntable at T.H.E. Vegas 2026
Bergmann Magne Airbearing Turntable with YG Acoustics Vantage 3 Live preamp/control unit.

Additional elements rounded out the system, including AGS Diffusors (Acoustic Groove System) from Nihon Onkyo Engineering, which could easily add another $20K to the total. No, I didn’t A/B test them like a lab experiment, but patterns matter. Two of the best sounding rooms at the show used AGS, and that’s not a coincidence. In addition, power conditioning was handled by the AudioQuest Niagara 5000 at $6,900, delivering clean and stable current to the entire system.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

The Vantage 3 Live is not shy about muscle. Each speaker packs 2,100 watts of amplification, with 700 watts dedicated to each driver. That kind of headroom is not just for bragging rights. It shows up immediately in control, dynamics, and composure, regardless of source.

“Is This Love” by Bob Marley and the Wailers on vinyl was captivating. The soundstage stretched wide without losing focus, and Marley’s voice stayed locked dead center. It had the kind of precision you expect from a mastering studio, pulling every last bit of information out of the grooves without sounding clinical.

Switching to digital via Roon and Anette Askvik’s “Liberty” didn’t feel like a compromise. Nothing collapsed, nothing softened. The presentation remained spacious, detailed, and controlled, with a level of consistency between analog and digital that most systems struggle to achieve. This is what YG does when everything lines up.

Advertisement

Learn more at supremeacousticsystems.com or listen to sound clips on Instagram.

Best Under $50K: Atlantis Lab / Neoson / Audiobyte

atlantis-lab-a31-pro-loudspeakers-vegas-2026
Atlantis Lab A31 Pro Loudspeakers in foreground.

Interestingly, just a few rooms over, the Atlantis Lab speaker system (presented by U.S. distributor Decibel+) went in the exact opposite direction of the YG setup. Where YG leaned on brute force and digital control, this one stripped things down to something far more old school. We’re talking roughly 1/100th the power, less than half the price, and yet it delivered a wildly intoxicating tube driven presentation that pulled you in just as quickly, if not faster.

The system was built around three brands that, frankly, were not on my radar before this show. Atlantis Lab handled loudspeakers, Neoson provided amplification, and Audiobyte (new company out of Romania) rounded things out with a streamer and DAC.

It should not have worked as well as it did on paper, especially in a show environment. But sometimes the rooms that make the least sense end up being the ones you remember. This was one of them.

neoson-evolution-veags-2026
Neoson Evolution Tube Amplifier

Atlantis Lab brought its high efficiency loudspeaker lineup, with models ranging from just over $3K to roughly $24K. The system was driven by the Neoson Evolution Tube Amplifier at $11,828, delivering 20 watts per channel of pure Class A power. Digital duties were handled by Audiobyte with the SuperHub streamer ($4K) and SuperVOX multibit DSD DAC ($4,500).

Advertisement

What made this setup more than just another good room was the backstory. We were told that each of the French brands was founded by two friends who intentionally designed their products with the other in mind. That kind of collaboration usually sounds like marketing copy. Here, it translated into real system synergy.

Atlantis Lab Loudspeakers T.H.E. Vegas 2026
Background (left to right):
Atlantis Lab A16 Pro ($3,218)
Atlantis Lab A18 Pro ($4,960)
Atlantis Lab A21 Pro ($4,196)
Atlantis Lab A23 Pro ($6,466)
Atlantis Lab A31 Pro ($14,194)
Foreground:
Atlantis Lab A38 Pro ($23,939)

I spent time with the three largest Atlantis Lab floorstanding models, all paired with the same Neoson Evolution Tube Amplifier and Audiobyte front end. The A23 Pro ($6,466 per pair) did not quite deliver the same level of impact, but that felt more like a room mismatch than a flaw. Large hotel ballrooms are not forgiving, and if you are not sitting in the right spot, even good speakers can sound a bit restrained.

The two larger models stepped up in a meaningful way. They filled the room with more depth, width, and texture, the kind of presentation you usually do not hear until prices climb into far more uncomfortable territory. Comparing the A31 Pro and A38 Pro, which are separated by roughly $10K, was less straightforward. The flagship may have offered a bit more bass weight and scale, but the difference was not night and day. Some of that could have been expectation bias creeping in.

What stood out with both was their ability to throw a wide, stable soundstage while maintaining composure off axis. They did not collapse the moment you shifted in your seat. More importantly, they had a knack for uncovering layers of detail without sounding analytical, pulling you deeper into the performance rather than pushing it at you.

Advertisement
Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

These are not brands most people walk into a show expecting to hear. That should change. 

Learn more at Decibel+ or hear sound clips on Instagram.

Honorable Mentions


Oriaco G6 / Electocompanient

oriaco-g6-vegas-2026

Tony Minasian’s custom built loudspeakers remain one of those under the radar discoveries you tend to only encounter at T.H.E. Show. He is not chasing mass market appeal. He builds each pair by hand using the best parts he can source, and prices them accordingly. At $4,500 per pair, his bookshelf models are not entry level, but they are clearly aimed at listeners who care more about nuance than brute force, especially those drawn to acoustic, unamplified music.

The Oriaco G6 is the standout. It has an uncanny ability to expose the small things that most speakers gloss over. The pluck of a guitar string, the decay of a piano note, the snap of a snare drum. Nothing feels exaggerated, just revealed with a level of clarity that pulls you in rather than pushing detail at you.

Advertisement

Tony usually keeps things grounded with a Denon integrated amp and a vintage Marantz CD player, but this year he stepped it up with Electrocompaniet electronics. The system included the ECI 6 MKII integrated amplifier ($6,500) and EMC 1 MKV CD player ($7,200), bringing the total system north of $20K. He even supplied a full loom of his own hand crafted cables, adding another $2,300 to the tally.

It is a complete system with very little left to chance, but the real story is the speaker which features an extra up-firing tweeter for spaciousness. If you are in the market for a high-end bookshelf and live anywhere near Southern California, it is worth reaching out for an audition. Or wait for T.H.E. Show SoCal, where there is a good chance you will find Tony set up again, quietly reminding people what a well voiced speaker can do.

Learn more at tonianlabs.com or hear sound clips on Instagram.

KEF R3 Meta / Eversolo

kef-eversolo-angle-vegas-2026

Stepping down to something far more attainable, Desert Premium Audio demonstrated a KEF and Eversolo system that landed just north of $16K and made a strong case for smart system building over brute force spending.

At the core were the R3 Meta bookshelf speakers ($2,500 per pair), supported by dual KEF KC92 subwoofers ($2,500 each), creating a full range foundation that punched well beyond what most would expect from standmounts. Amplification came from the Eversolo AMP-F10 ($2,480), while the DMP-A10 ($4,000) handled preamp duties and streaming. Rounding things out, the Onix XST20 SACD/CD transport ($2,399) added a physical media option for those not ready to abandon discs entirely.

Advertisement

It is a thoughtfully assembled system that balances modern streaming convenience with old school sources, and more importantly, shows how far careful matching can take you without chasing six figure territory.

German Physiks

german-physiks-vegas-2026

The most expensive system at T.H.E. Vegas came courtesy of Aaudio Imports, and it did not hold back. Priced just shy of $400K, the setup centered on the distinctive Borderland MK II omnidirectional loudspeakers from German Physiks ($54K per pair), driven by the Emperor Extreme solid state integrated amplifier ($60K). Cabling alone, from Stage III, accounted for well over $100K, which tells you exactly where this system was aimed.

The source chain was equally ambitious. A Pink Faun 2.16 Ultra music server and streamer ($43K) fed the system alongside the Ancient Audio Lector Joy CD player ($26K). Digital conversion was handled by the Ypsilon DAC 1000 SE ($50K), supported by a SIN PSD 10 power distributor ($25K), Reiki network switches ($10K), and ART electromagnetic treatment ($18K) to address every possible variable in the signal chain.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

On paper, it is the kind of system that should stop you in your tracks. In practice, I wanted to be convinced. Here’s a sound clip on Instagram.

Advertisement

T10 Bespoke

t10-bespoke-carbon-phantom-vegas-2026

Bear Clark, better known as “Hi-Fi Bear,” was on hand showing the T10 Bespoke wireless earbuds that we named Best in Show at CES 2026 just a few months ago. Starting at $3,000, each pair is hand built and fully customizable, along with its matching pendant charging case. And when we say customizable, we mean it. Snakeskin, gemstones, even diamonds. If you can imagine it, he can probably make it.

Or you can skip the subtlety entirely and go straight for The BillionEAR Attaché Smoker’s Edition at $14,500, which bundles the earbuds in an attaché case with cigars, a smoking pipe, and a few other indulgences thrown in for good measure.

Learn more at t10bespoke.com.

Usher Grand Tower

usher-grand-tower-loudspeakers-vegas-2026

The largest loudspeakers at T.H.E. Vegas came from Usher Audio with the Grand Tower ($42,000 per pair), driven by the BMC Audio CS3 integrated amplifier (around $10K). On paper, 200 watts per channel should have been more than enough to get them moving.

In reality, the room won. Inside a massive untreated ballroom, the Grand Towers struggled to pressurize the space and never quite locked in. It was less about the speakers and more about the environment. Even big systems can feel small when the room refuses to cooperate.

Island Router

island-router-vegas-2026

The Island Router is aimed at listeners who take their network as seriously as their system. Priced at $499, it brings enterprise grade routing and firewall capability into the home, with features like fault tolerant failover when two internet lines are connected, straightforward app based setup, and optimization designed to squeeze the most out of whatever bandwidth your ISP delivers.

There is a catch. No built in Wi-Fi. You will need to connect a separate wireless access point or hotspot if you want coverage throughout the house. It is not designed to be an all-in-one solution. It is designed to be stable, secure, and out of the way.

Advertisement

Ai Pro

Ai Pro offered up a range of affordable fashion headphones, charging cases, and solar charger.

T.H.E. Vintage Lounge

vintage-lounge-vegas-2026

A solid selection of vintage gear was also in active rotation, not just sitting there for nostalgia points. Highlights included the original Klipsch Cornwall, JBL 4430, and Falcon Acoustics LS3/5a, alongside racks of classic amplification. 

The Bottom Line

T.H.E. Vegas 2026 was not the biggest show, and it never really recovered from the last minute venue change or the unfortunate calendar clash with the Montreal Audiofest. The lighter exhibitor list and smaller footprint were noticeable. There is no point pretending otherwise.

But smaller is not always worse. The upside was real. Less crowd noise, more time in the rooms, and actual conversations with designers and distributors that did not feel rushed or transactional. It created space to hear systems more clearly, swap components, and discover brands that might have been lost in a larger, more chaotic show.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

Credit to the T.H.E. team for getting this event back on its feet under difficult circumstances. That kind of recovery is not easy, especially in a year where the industry calendar is already stretched thin.

Advertisement

Next up, T.H.E. heads to Austin from May 22 to 24, 2026, while AXPONA 2026 is right around the corner. We will be in Chicago next week, where the scale, competition, and expectations all ramp up.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

The five best headphones of 2026

Published

on

Bose were the pretty much the first brand to bring noise-cancelling cans to the masses, but they also make a wide range of headphones to suit whatever need you’re after.

Whether it’s a pair of wireless over-ears, true wireless or open-earbuds; we’ve got plenty of options for you to choose from. The headphones we’ve highlighted are the best that Bose offers.

Each pair has been put through rigorous testing in real world settings. We test the noise-cancelling in outdoor environments, on planes (when we can), on public transport and walking around cities to give you our best judgement on good Bose headphones cancel noise.

We take calls on the headphones in quiet and busy areas to judge whether they’re good enough in that department. We’ll walk through areas with wireless interference to test how good the connection is. We’ll drain the battery over several hours to see if it lives up to Bose’s claims, as well as test the app and other features the headphones come with.

Advertisement

Sound, however, is king; and we’ll give these headphones a thorough listen with a wide range of music to see how good they sound. Where possible, we’ll compare new Bose headphones to older models to see if they’ve improved and how the sound might have changed.

The aim is always to give you the best picture of how good Bose headphones are. If there’s an area where we don’t think they’re good in, we’ll make it clear in our reviews and you can judge for yourself.

Advertisement

If you’re shopping around we have other lists we’d recommend you have a look at. Our selection of best headphones, best over-ears, best noise-cancelling headphones, and best wireless earbuds will keep you busy with plenty of alternatives to look at

Advertisement

We also have brand-specific best lists as well, including one for Bose’s biggest rival in the best Sony headphones.

SQUIRREL_ANCHOR_LIST

Advertisement

  • Class-leading noise-cancellation
  • Improved call quality
  • Tweaks to audio are positive
  • Comfortable to wear
  • Excellent Bluetooth performance
  • Technics edges it for sound
  • Battery life slipping behind others
  • Among the most expensive wireless earbuds

Bose’s noise-cancelling earbuds have been excellent ever since we reviewed the very first one. Nearly each and every single one of them has scored five-stars and that’s a run that continues with its latest ANC earbud in the QC Ultra Earbuds 2nd Gen.

They’re not the best noise-cancelling earbuds (that crown would go to Sony) but they’re not far off with a performance that’s even better than the previous earbuds, creating a world that’s almost dead silent, suppressing people’s voices and environmental noises with excellence.

The transparency is excellent too, perhaps the most natural-sounding on the market, filtering in outside sounds with brilliant clarity. If there’s an area they do struggle a little with, it’s in managing wind noise.

Advertisement

Call quality has improved, a previous bug bear of older Bose true wireless, this flagship picks up voices well and isolates your voice from any noises around you. You can now use the Bose earbuds for calls both inside and outdoors without too much of an issue.

The sound quality is mostly the same, with few improvements here and there. The bass performance is slightly reduced for a more balanced performance.  The highs are more detailed, while the midrange is clearer and more insightful. It’s an overall more detailed and clearer sound, and so far, the best of any Bose earbuds.

Battery life is the same as before and a little disappointing in the grand scheme of things. You’d hope for more than five hours per charge when Bose’s rivals are offering more.

Nonetheless, if you want the best that Bose offers for earbuds then look no further than the QC Ultra Earbuds 2. If you can’t afford this premium price, then we’d suggest having a look at the QuietComfort Earbuds, which are an excellent mid-tier choice.

Advertisement
  • Class-leading ANC for the money
  • Clear, spacious audio
  • Excellent Bluetooth performance
  • Customisable performance
  • Comfortable fit
  • Slightly chunky appearance
  • Not the most exciting sound
  • Below-par call quality
  • ANC isn’t adjustable

If you find Bose’s flagship earbuds too expensive for your wallet, there is a less expensive option in the QuietComfort Earbuds (2nd Gen) and they are an excellent choice.

They bring Bose’s noise-cancelling skills to more affordable prices, delivering class-leading performance for less than £200. They’re good at suppressing people’s voices, good at reducing noise on planes and public transport, with the ANC good enough that we never felt we had to raise the volume to remove more noise.

The transparency mode is not as clear as the flagship but that’s no surprise. It sounds natural enough and clear when the Aware mode is activated though there is some additional noise to the sound that they create.

The call quality isn’t great though, with voice pick not very strong leading to a mumbly performance.

The sound is on stronger footing. It’s clear, spacious, detailed and balanced across the frequency range. Bass is good, though not the biggest you’ll ever hear, and these aren’t the most dynamic and energetic of earbuds to listen to. They lack a little excitement, but they’re an easy pair to listen to.

Advertisement

When it comes to Bose’s true wireless options, these are the best value earbuds they offer.

  • Improved noise-cancellation
  • Comfortable to wear
  • Strong wireless performance
  • USB-C audio
  • Better battery life
  • Average call quality
  • Rivals offer better sound for less money

The sequel to the original QuietComfort Ultra Headphones is an improvement, despite the lower score we’ve awarded them.

If you want the Bose’s best performance for noise-cancellation, battery life, and sound; then the QuietComfort Ultra Headphones 2nd Gen are the headphones you should buy without delay.

The sound is improved with a little more detail, clearer highs and a better performance with Immersive Audio than their predecessors, though we still feel the sound of the headphones’ spatial audio could be better.

They suppress noises better than the original model, though it’s a slight improvement rather than a massive one. The transparency mode is clear and detailed, though call quality we’d rate as average. These headphones let in noise and that affects how clear calls, especially outside, can be.

Advertisement

The design hasn’t changed much aside from a slightly more premium look. These headphones can fold, which means you can pack them in a small bag if you don’t have much space, and they do come with a carry case to keep scratches and marks at bay.

There’s a new Cinema mode for watching video on the go that uses the headphones’ Immersive Audio feature for a bigger, deeper and wider performance. These headphones have also introduced USB-C audio with support up to 24-bit/192kHz. If you want to hear these headphones at their best, we recommend you have a listen over a wired USB-C connection.

They’re comfortable to wear as we’ve come to expect from Bose, and the battery life has been extended to 30 hours, so they can survive a few long-haul flights before they need a charge.

Though they scored lower than the original QC Ultra Headphones, these are a better effort. But they’re still pricey and rivals are better in some respects if you’re thinking of shopping outside of the Bose family.

Advertisement
  • Comfortable to wear
  • Clear, detailed sound
  • Solid battery life
  • Striking looks
  • Weak noise isolation
  • Indifferent call quality
  • Lacks bass
  • Expensive

There’s only been one pair of open-ears from Bose and they’re a pretty impressive one in the Ultra Open Earbuds.

They clip on to the ear rather than sit on the earlobe, effectively kickstarting the design that others have adopted.

Since release, Bose has leaned into the visual look of buds by offering different colours. If you want a pair of headphones that also stand out as fashion statement, the Ultra Open Earbuds are very bougie.

We found them very comfortable to wear, with the clip-on design not causing any irritation or pinching. They come with physical controls rather than touch, which makes using them easier. An IPX4 rating means they’re protected against some sweat and water, so you could consider taking these for a run or to the gym.

Battery life is 7.5 hours and in our tests that was right on the money. Fast-charging is supported but there’s no wireless charging unless you pay an additional £70. If there’s a sequel to these earbuds, we hope that Bose includes it as standard given the high price.

Advertisement

There’s support for Bose’s Immersive Audio feature, though we found it doesn’t work as well in an outdoor environment when the audio of the earbuds is competing with everything else.

The sound quality is up there with the best for open ears, though Bose’s in-ear true wireless offer much higher levels of clarity, detail and bass.

But the clarity, sharpness, and levels of detail the Bose offer are best-in-class. Where they’re lacking most is in the bass department, which is not a surprise as it affects most models, but if a sequel were to come along, bass would be an area for improvement.

Leakage of audio is also surprisingly little. Turn the volume up (which you will need to) and people around won’t hear much of what you’re listening to.

Advertisement

The clever, innovative design and solid sound make these open-earbuds a winner. The price is high but as like the rest of the headphones on this list, Bose charges a premium. These are, however, one of the best open-ears you can get.

  • Warmer, bigger bass than older model
  • Solid enough noise-cancellation
  • Very comfortable to wear
  • Excellent wireless performance
  • Beaten for battery life
  • Strange call performance

While the QuietComfort Ultra Headphones 1st Gen are still available at a reduced price, the over-ear headphones we think are best for most people are the QuietComfort Headphones.

These are priced around £229 / $229, and they’re a simple pair in comparison to the Ultra models. They don’t feature Immersive Audio, there’s no aptX Bluetooth, the battery life isn’t as long, and the noise-cancellation isn’t as strong.

But we’d expect fewer features and a trade-off in performance for the price.

As usual, the comfort levels of these headphones is good, with a light clamping force so the headphones don’t feel too tight, and the earpads providing a soft cushion against the head. There’s an adjustable slider to fit different head sizes.

Advertisement

Battery life is 24 hours, though our tests suggest it’s less than that. The noise-cancellation isn’t the most powerful performance but it’s good at cutting down environmental noise, traffic and people’s voices, though wind noise can distract on a blustery day.

The call quality isn’t the best, especially in noisy places as it becomes harder for the headphones to pick up your voice when it’s competing against other noise.

Though they look very much like the QC 45 headphones, the QuietComfort Headphones have a different sound profile. Warmer, with more bass, detail and definition than the older model.

These are a rock-solid pair of Bose headphones at a price that’s less expensive than Bose’s other over-ears. If the Ultra Headphones are too expensive, this over-ear is what we’d recommend if you’re not fussed about spatial audio and higher Bluetooth specs.

Advertisement

SQUIRREL_ANCHOR_LIST

Full Specs

  Bose QuietComfort Ultra Earbuds (2nd Gen) Review Bose QuietComfort Earbuds (2nd Gen) Review Bose QuietComfort Ultra Headphones (2nd Gen) Review Bose Ultra Open Earbuds Review Bose QuietComfort Headphones Review
UK RRP £299 £179.95 £449 £299 £299
USA RRP $299 $449 $299 $299
EU RRP €349
AUD RRP AU$449
Manufacturer Bose Bose Bose Bose Bose
IP rating IPX4 IPX4 No IPX4 No
Battery Hours 24 31.5 30 27 24
Wireless charging Yes Yes
Fast Charging Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Size (Dimensions) x x INCHES
Weight 77 G 250 G 237 G
ASIN B0F7M3HPBD B0D8BT4BRN B0CPFV77W4 B0CCZC9J1V
Release Date 2025 2024 2025 2024 2023
Audio Resolution SBC, AAX, aptX Adaptive SBC, AAC SBC, AAC, aptX Adaptive SBC, AAC, aptX Adaptive SBC, AAC
Noise Cancellation? Yes Yes Yes Yes
Connectivity Bluetooth 5.3 Bluetooth 5.3 Bluetooth 5.4, USB-C Bluetooth 5.3 Bluetooth 5.1
Colours Black, Whie, Plum, Violet Black, Lilac, Pink, Blue, White Black, Desert Gold, Driftwood Sand, Midnight Violet, White Black, White pink, white, blue, lilac, sandstone, black and twilight blue
Frequency Range 20 20000 – Hz 20 20000 – Hz 20 20000 – Hz – Hz 20 20000 – Hz
Headphone Type True Wireless True Wireless Over-ear In-ear Over-ear
Voice Assistant N/A


Source link
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025