Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Business

Lawsuit over $21 million donor-advised fund highlights risks of DAFs

Published

on

Lawsuit over $21 million donor-advised fund highlights risks of DAFs

Ridvan_celik | Istock | Getty Images

A version of this article first appeared in CNBC’s Inside Wealth newsletter with Robert Frank, a weekly guide to the high-net-worth investor and consumer. Sign up to receive future editions, straight to your inbox.

With donor-advised funds gaining popularity as a vehicle for the wealthy to give back, risks and potential conflicts of interests are emerging — and being put on display in a lawsuit over a family’s $21 million charitable fund.

Advertisement

Philip Peterson, a 63-year-old Kansas resident, filed suit in January alleging that the nonprofit that administers his family’s donor-advised fund has refused to communicate with him and has failed to make charitable grants that he has recommended since early 2024. The suit, filed in Colorado federal court, alleges the Christian nonprofit, called WaterStone, cut off his access to information about the account and that he doesn’t know how the fund has fared since the end of 2023, when it had $21 million in assets.

Counsel for WaterStone, founded as the Christian Community Foundation, said in a statement that the Colorado Springs nonprofit has respected the wishes of Peterson’s late father, who originally created the fund in 2005 and died in 2019.

The case sheds light on the growing uptake, and dangers, of donor-advised funds, or DAFs, which have quickly become one of the most dominant forces in philanthropy. Americans donated nearly $90 billion to DAFs in 2024, per the most recent annual report from the DAF Research Collaborative. According to the most recent data available, DAFs held $326 billion combined in assets in 2024.

For Americans looking to give back and save on taxes, DAFs are marketed as a flexible and simple way to do so, often described as charitable saving accounts or credit cards. Instead of writing a check to a nonprofit, donors contribute cash and other assets to a DAF. While the tax deduction is immediate, the funds can be allocated to charities later.  

Advertisement

DAFs, unlike private foundations, are not required to distribute assets within a given timeframe, a common criticism among opponents who say DAFs are wealth hoarding vehicles.

The Peterson case offers a cautionary tale on the tradeoffs – especially when it comes to control. While donors are able to recommend how the funds are distributed to charity, the assets are legally controlled by the organizations that administer the DAF on their behalf. Though these organizations, also known as sponsors, typically respect their donors’ wishes, donors have little recourse if they do not.

“It’s sold to the public as, ‘This is your account, and you can decide where it goes, and you can move it, and you maintain full control.’ But if you don’t give up dominion and control, you don’t get the tax benefits,” said Ray Madoff, tax scholar and professor at Boston College Law School. “There’s a disconnect between the legal rules that govern it and the understanding of the parties. And this case is a perfect example of it.”

How much to give

Peterson told Inside Wealth that the rift with WaterStone started with a disagreement over how much to distribute.

Advertisement

In early 2024, Peterson alleges, WaterStone CEO Ken Harrison told him that the organization was going to keep the fund’s principal in perpetuity and only make grants from investment income. Peterson said he did not agree to the proposal as this would not allow the fund to make its customary annual grants of between $2.3 million and $2.5 million.

He further alleges that in March 2024, after he told Harrison over Zoom that he wanted to move the DAF to another sponsor, Harrison told him never to contact WaterStone again and abruptly ended the call.

Now Peterson is suing to assert his advisory privileges and regain access to the DAF, which was started by his late father, Gordon Peterson, a real estate investor and devout Christian, to support evangelical Christian causes. Peterson ultimately seeks the court to compel WaterStone to transfer the DAF to another organization so he can bring the fund’s giving back up to speed.

He said he requested WaterStone make a $1 million grant in 2024 but does not know if that grant – or if any grants – were issued that year. In 2025, WaterStone notified Peterson it would permit a $400,000 distribution from the fund, he said.

Advertisement

“I made a promise to my father. I promised him that if I was the remaining person on the account that I would direct the funds as I knew that he would 100% approve,” he said. “I want to be a man of my word.”

Philip Peterson, left, pictured with his father Gordon in 2015. Gordon Peterson passed away in 2019.

Courtesy of Philip Peterson

WaterStone declined to comment on specifics of Peterson’s allegations. The deadline for WaterStone to answer the complaint in court or move to dismiss it is mid-March.

Advertisement

“WaterStone has consistently carried out the articulated wishes of the donor since the donor advised fund in question was established,” WaterStone’s legal counsel said in a written statement, referring to Peterson’s father. “The plaintiff in this case is not the donor.”

Andrew Nussbaum, Peterson’s lawyer, said that WaterStone helped Gordon Peterson appoint his wife, Ruth, and son Philip as co-advisors to the DAF before he died. Ruth Peterson died in 2021, leaving Philip Peterson as the sole successor-advisor. Prior to 2024, WaterStone granted Philip Peterson’s grant requests, Nussbaum said.

Nussbaum said the lawsuit could set a chilling precedent if the court upholds WaterStone’s argument that designated successors do not have advisory privileges.

“If WaterStone is right, you’re talking about billions of dollars being beyond any kind of legal reach of the original donor-advisors or their successors to have any oversight related to the funds,” Nussbaum said.

Advertisement

Moreover, Peterson said he believes WaterStone has not honored his father’s wishes. He alleges that WaterStone has delayed or denied his grant recommendations even though they met the mission statement written by his father, which included a list of approved charities.

“I can tell you this: My dad would never have created a donor-advised fund if he knew that this was going to be the outcome. He felt very passionately about this,” he said.

DAF trade-offs

Law professor and DAF critic Roger Colinvaux said in his view, donors who want control of DAF assets are trying to have their cake and eat it too. 

“Whether you like DAFs or not, the DAF sponsor is an independent charity. It’s an independent entity, and its duties are not to the donor,” said Colinvaux, professor at the Columbus School of Law at the Catholic University of America. “If the plaintiff wanted the sort of control that the plaintiff seems to want, as evidenced in the complaint, there’s a structure for that, and that’s a private foundation.” 

Advertisement

Dana Brakman Reiser, professor at Brooklyn Law School, cautioned that Peterson’s story is a rare scenario. She said the biggest DAF sponsors like Fidelity Charitable and Schwab Charitable (now DAFgiving360) are affiliated with financial institutions and generally inclined to keep donors happy.

“It’s in their interest as long as honoring the donor’s request is not going to get the sponsor in trouble,” she said. Brakman Reiser added that the IRS prohibits using DAF assets to buy gala tickets or support private foundations or non-501(c)(3) organizations.

Get Inside Wealth directly to your inbox

Still, the interests of sponsors and donor-advisors are rarely perfectly aligned.

Sponsors typically collect fees for managing DAF assets, creating an inherent financial incentive to disburse fewer assets, according to Chuck Collins, the director of the Program on Inequality and the Common Good at the Institute for Policy Studies, a progressive think tank. While community foundations pioneered the DAF model, they are now competing with larger commercially-affiliated sponsors for donors’ dollars, he added.

Advertisement

“More and more, they are having to compete with the commercial DAFs like Fidelity that have very low overhead and don’t take much in the way of fees. And so what’s the business model for a community foundation where, you know, 80% of the donations coming in are from people wanting to create DAFs?” he said. “In reality, their business model now depends on people parking their assets for longer periods of time.”

While Peterson’s case is unusual, it’s not the first legal challenge surrounding DAFs.

In 2018, a hedge fund couple sued Fidelity Charitable, contending the sponsor broke an agreement to liquidate their donated shares gradually and instead sold off 1.93 million shares, a position originally worth $100 million, in a matter of hours. Fidelity Charitable argued that it had followed the law and the case was ruled in their favor.

In another noteworthy debacle, in 2009, a Virginia-based charity called the National Heritage Foundation wiped out 9,000 DAFs worth $25 million combined to pay out creditors after it filed for bankruptcy. 

Advertisement

Giving directly to charity doesn’t necessarily guarantee the assets will be used to the donor’s intent. But adding an intermediary into the equation adds another layer of complexity. 

The handful of lawsuits filed by donor-advisors over how DAF assets are spent or invested have thus far been largely unsuccessful in court.

In short, according to Colinvaux, courts have upheld that donors have ceded any control in order to qualify for the tax break. If donors had the right to control assets — as opposed to the privilege to advise — they would not be able to claim a deduction, he said.

Nussbaum said Peterson’s case is different as it focuses on his rights to advise grants rather than control over how the assets are investments. 

Advertisement

Peterson said he tried to resolve the dispute with Waterstone for about two years before going to court. While he knows his suit faces considerable odds, he said he felt he had no choice.

“People put an enormous amount of trust in these companies, and we’re hopefully going to find out what these companies can and can’t do,” he said. “It may have a big effect on the industry, and I don’t want to be that guy. All I want to do is to be able to continue my father’s legacy.”

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Business

Why FPI interest in India ‘has pretty much died out’: Nithin Kamath points to valuations, taxes and global alternatives

Published

on

Why FPI interest in India 'has pretty much died out': Nithin Kamath points to valuations, taxes and global alternatives
Foreign investor appetite for Indian equities may be cooling sharply, if insights shared by Nithin Kamath are anything to go by. In a recent social media post, the Zerodha co-founder said feedback from a stock market insider suggests that global investors are increasingly turning cautious on India, citing a mix of macro, valuation, and policy concerns.

According to Kamath, India is currently viewed as geopolitically vulnerable—particularly to potential oil shocks—while the absence of compelling artificial intelligence-led investment opportunities has further dampened its appeal. Elevated valuations and concerns around the rupee have also added to investor hesitation.

He noted that many foreign investors who were sitting on gains have already booked profits and are reallocating capital to other markets such as Japan, Taiwan, South Korea, and parts of Europe, where relative valuations and growth narratives appear more attractive.

Policy-related factors are also playing a role. Kamath highlighted that India’s capital gains tax framework—especially the structure of long-term and short-term capital gains (LTCG/STCG)—along with the recent increase in Securities Transaction Tax (STT), has made the market less competitive versus global peers that are currently attracting stronger inflows.

Advertisement

With foreign portfolio investment (FPI) flows turning volatile, Kamath suggested that rationalising these tax structures could be a “low-hanging fruit” to improve India’s attractiveness and bring global investors back into the fold.


“Asked someone from the industry whether foreign investors are still interested in allocating to India. The TLDR: Interest has pretty much died out. India is seen as geopolitically exposed, especially to an oil shock. There are no real AI plays. Valuations are rich. And the rupee situation doesn’t help. On top of that, investors who were sitting on gains have taken money off the table and are now looking at markets like Japan, Taiwan, Korea, Europe etc instead,” the tweet said.
“He also pointed out that our LTCG/STCG structure and the increase in STT have made India less attractive compared to other markets that are seeing inflows. If we need to attract FPIs back, and we do, fixing this feels like pretty low-hanging fruit,” Kamath added.Nifty is down 9% this year, as FIIs continue to leave India. They have offloaded equities worth Rs 1,77,271 crore so far this year. In just six sessions this month, they have sold Rs 46,149 crore worth of stocks.
Domestic markets ended with cuts today, ending their five-session gaining streak. They fell amid significant selling pressure in financial stocks along with auto and FMCG counters. Nifty plunged 222.25 points or 0.93% to finish at 23,775.10. Meanwhile, Sensex declined 947.22 points or 1.22% to settle at 76,615.68.

(Disclaimer: The recommendations, suggestions, views, and opinions given by the experts are their own. These do not represent the views of The Economic Times.)

Continue Reading

Business

FBCG: Bluechip Growth Investing Can Help Earn Market-Beating Returns

Published

on

MDYG: A Solid Mid-Cap ETF To Ride Recovery And Earn Good Return Over Long Term

FBCG: Bluechip Growth Investing Can Help Earn Market-Beating Returns

Continue Reading

Business

Canada stocks lower at close of trade; S&P/TSX Composite down 0.42%

Published

on


Canada stocks lower at close of trade; S&P/TSX Composite down 0.42%

Continue Reading

Business

Macro buffers to help India tide over Gulf crisis: World Bank

Published

on

Macro buffers to help India tide over Gulf crisis: World Bank
New Delhi: India’s growth projection of 6.6% for FY27 faces downside risks from the Gulf conflict, but the economy remains well placed to navigate the global energy shock, supported by strong macroeconomic buffers, the World Bank said on Thursday.

The country is expected to remain among the fastest-growing major economies. Growth for FY27 reflects the impact of higher global energy prices due to the Middle East conflict and is expected to average 7.1% in FY28-29, it noted.

The World Bank has assumed oil prices at $90-100 per barrel for FY27.

Despite external risks, macroeconomic strength and policy measures are expected to provide some insulation. However, the multilateral lender flagged energy diversification, prudent fiscal management and trade liberalisation as key priorities.

Aurelien Kruse, lead economist for India at the World Bank, said the country entered the current fiscal year from a position of strength.

Advertisement


“Substantial foreign reserves, low inflation, predominantly rupee-denominated public debt, a healthy financial sector, and trade diversification efforts play a major role in providing resilience from external headwinds,” said the World Bank.
The Reserve Bank of India expects growth of 6.9% for FY27. Without the ongoing conflict, growth was estimated at 7.2%, supported by stronger-than-expected performance in FY26, the World Bank said.

India’s gross domestic product (GDP) growth is expected at 7.6% in FY26, driven by private consumption, manufacturing, exports and investment, despite high tariffs imposed by the US.

Inflation is projected to rise to 4.9% in FY27, according to the World Bank, due to higher food prices, partial pass-through of global energy prices and currency depreciation pressures. Elevated energy prices are also likely to raise input costs for industry.

“Boosting private sector-led growth will be critical to strengthening economic resilience and supporting more young people to enter the workforce,” said Paul Procee, acting country director for India at the World Bank.

He added that achieving the goal of Viksit Bharat will require a predictable, business-friendly environment to unlock investment and create jobs at scale in sectors such as energy and infrastructure, manufacturing, tourism, healthcare and agribusiness.

Advertisement

New Delhi: India’s growth projection of 6.6% for FY27 faces downside risks from the Gulf conflict, but the economy remains well placed to navigate the global energy shock, supported by strong macroeconomic buffers, the World Bank said on Thursday.

The country is expected to remain among the fastest-growing major economies. Growth for FY27 reflects the impact of higher global energy prices due to the Middle East conflict and is expected to average 7.1% in FY28-29, it noted.

The World Bank has assumed oil prices at $90-100 per barrel for FY27.

Despite external risks, macroeconomic strength and policy measures are expected to provide some insulation. However, the multilateral lender flagged energy diversification, prudent fiscal management and trade liberalisation as key priorities.

Advertisement

Aurelien Kruse, lead economist for India at the World Bank, said the country entered the current fiscal year from a position of strength.

“Substantial foreign reserves, low inflation, predominantly rupee-denominated public debt, a healthy financial sector, and trade diversification efforts play a major role in providing resilience from external headwinds,” said the World Bank.

The Reserve Bank of India expects growth of 6.9% for FY27.

Without the ongoing conflict, growth was estimated at 7.2%, supported by stronger-than-expected performance in FY26, the World Bank said.

Advertisement

India’s gross domestic product (GDP) growth is expected at 7.6% in FY26, driven by private consumption, manufacturing, exports and investment, despite high tariffs imposed by the US.

Inflation is projected to rise to 4.9% in FY27, according to the World Bank, due to higher food prices, partial pass-through of global energy prices and currency depreciation pressures. Elevated energy prices are also likely to raise input costs for industry.

“Boosting private sector-led growth will be critical to strengthening economic resilience and supporting more young people to enter the workforce,” said Paul Procee, acting country director for India at the World Bank.

He added that achieving the goal of Viksit Bharat will require a predictable, business-friendly environment to unlock investment and create jobs at scale in sectors such as energy and infrastructure, manufacturing, tourism, healthcare and agribusiness.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business

Rise in the number of Welsh shoppers on the high street

Published

on

Business Live

Retail footfall was up in March shows new figures from MRI Software.

Shoppers in Swansea..(Image: SWEP/John Corbett)

The retail sector in Wales has been boosted with a healthy rise in shopping numbers, shows new research.

According to data from MRI Software, based on a survey of 700 store managers, in the five week period from March 1st to April 4th, footfall increased by 6.3% on February across all retail destinations and was up 2.8% year-on-year. This sustained growth reflects the impact of key calendar events, including Mother’s Day, St Patrick’s Day and the early start to Easter trading, which encouraged consumers back into physical retail destinations.

High streets experienced the strongest growth up 8.7%, followed by retail parks, up 6.3% and shopping centres 1.6%. The broad uplift across the board highlights the strength of in‑person visits to retail stores and destinations as spring trading begins.

READ MORE: Welsh Government big win in legal challenge from Bristol AirportREAD MORE: New HQ for housing association Hedyn in the centre of Newport

Advertisement

As expected, Mother’s Day played an important role in shaping March’s footfall patterns. The week leading up to Easter delivered a 1.8% uplift week on week. However, when compared with the same period last year leading into Mother’s Day, footfall was 1.6% lower, suggesting shoppers were more considered in their spending.

Earlier in the month, St Patrick’s Day celebrations combined with warmer weather also helped in driving activity, particularly on Wales’ high streets where footfall rose 7.5% week on week during mid-March. Strong weekday increases during that week suggest social occasions combined with warmer weather continue to shape how consumers combine retail, leisure and hospitality visits.

The upward trend continued into the early Easter trading period, with the week leading into the holiday delivering a 7.5% increase in footfall across all Welsh retail destinations week on week. High streets led the growth recording an increase in footfall of 8.7% highlighting Easter as one of the year’s major retail trading periods outside of Christmas.

When measured against the equivalent week leading up to Easter 2025, footfall declined slightly by 0.2% overall. This suggests that while seasonal events still drive strong bursts of activity, consumers are approaching holiday spending more cautiously this year.

Advertisement

Jenni Matthews, analyst at MRI Software, said: “Despite ongoing economic uncertainty, footfall growth across Wales suggests that consumers are continuing to prioritise physical retail visits, particularly where value, convenience and a clear purpose are evident.

With Easter falling earlier in the calendar this year, March effectively marked the starting point for spring trading. While footfall trends remain stable, the data shows that events, holidays and social activities continue to drive visits to retail destinations, but shoppers are becoming more intentional as economic pressures persist. For retail stores and destinations, the challenge will be in demonstrating value to its shoppers as they become increasingly deliberate with their purchases.”

Continue Reading

Business

UnitedHealth Group: Don't Drink The CMS Kool-Aid

Published

on

UnitedHealth Group: Don't Drink The CMS Kool-Aid

UnitedHealth Group: Don't Drink The CMS Kool-Aid

Continue Reading

Business

Citigroup stock reaches 52-week high at 125.17 USD

Published

on


Citigroup stock reaches 52-week high at 125.17 USD

Continue Reading

Business

Micron Stock Rockets Toward $420 on Explosive AI Memory Demand and Record Q3 Guidance

Published

on

Earnings News: Micron Technology Inc (NASDAQ: MU)

BOISE, Idaho — Micron Technology Inc. shares climbed more than 3% Thursday to trade around $420.50 as investors continued to reward the memory chipmaker’s dominant position in the artificial intelligence boom, fueled by sold-out high-bandwidth memory production through 2026 and blockbuster guidance signaling another quarter of record revenue and margins.

The NASDAQ-listed company (MU) rose as high as $425 intraday amid broader optimism in tech stocks following a U.S.-Israel-Iran ceasefire that eased some geopolitical concerns. Micron has delivered staggering gains of more than 300% over the past year and roughly 40-50% year-to-date in 2026, with its market capitalization now exceeding $460 billion as it capitalizes on insatiable demand for advanced DRAM and HBM used in AI data centers.

Micron, a leading producer of DRAM, NAND flash and high-bandwidth memory essential for training and running large AI models, posted explosive fiscal second-quarter results in mid-March that crushed Wall Street expectations. For the quarter ended Feb. 26, 2026, the company reported revenue of $23.86 billion, up 196% from a year earlier and beating forecasts. Adjusted earnings per share surged to $12.20 from $1.56 in the prior-year period, handily topping consensus estimates.

CEO Sanjay Mehrotra highlighted “exceptional” performance driven by tight industry supply, strong AI demand and superior execution. Gross margins expanded dramatically to around 74%, reflecting premium pricing on AI-optimized products. The company also raised its dividend by 30% amid surging free cash flow, which hit record levels in the quarter.

Advertisement

Even more impressive was Micron’s guidance for the fiscal third quarter ending May 2026: revenue of $33.5 billion plus or minus $750 million — a figure that would represent another massive sequential jump and exceed the company’s full-year revenue for many prior years. Non-GAAP gross margin is projected near an eye-popping 81%, with adjusted EPS around $19.15. Management cited higher pricing, lower costs and a favorable product mix as drivers for further margin expansion.

“AI demand far exceeds supply, and we see that tightness continuing into 2027,” Mehrotra told analysts on the earnings call. The company’s entire HBM production for calendar 2026 is already sold out under binding agreements, providing rare visibility in the notoriously cyclical memory industry.

Micron has aggressively ramped production of its HBM3E and next-generation HBM4 products. In mid-March, the company announced it had begun high-volume shipments of its HBM4 36GB 12-high stack, designed for NVIDIA’s upcoming Vera Rubin platform. The new memory delivers more than 2.8 TB/s of bandwidth — a 2.3 times improvement — along with over 20% better power efficiency compared with prior generations.

While some reports have circulated about potential qualification delays or shifts in NVIDIA’s HBM4 allocations for initial Rubin builds, with SK Hynix and Samsung potentially taking larger early shares, Micron executives have pushed back strongly. Management reiterated that its full 2026 HBM supply — including HBM4 — remains fully contracted, with ongoing discussions for pricing and volume on advanced nodes. The company is also shipping samples of even higher-capacity HBM4 48GB 16-high stacks and expanding capacity through new fabs in the U.S., Singapore and Taiwan.

Advertisement

Analysts have responded with a wave of bullish upgrades and price target increases. KeyBanc recently set a $600 target, while UBS raised its target to $535. Consensus price targets now hover around $465 to $500, with some firms calling for $700 or more in optimistic scenarios. Ratings remain overwhelmingly Buy, with Wall Street viewing Micron as one of the purest and most leveraged plays on the AI infrastructure supercycle.

The company’s Cloud and Data Center business unit, which includes HBM sold to hyperscalers and GPU makers, has been the primary growth engine. Demand for memory in AI training clusters continues to outstrip available supply, even as non-OPEC+ producers add capacity elsewhere in the semiconductor chain. Micron’s technological edge in stacking and efficiency has allowed it to command premium pricing while competitors play catch-up.

Beyond HBM, Micron is seeing strength in traditional DRAM and NAND for data centers, PCs and smartphones. The firm highlighted innovations such as PCIe Gen6 SSDs and SOCAMM2 memory modules, further broadening its AI-adjacent portfolio.

Financially, Micron has transformed from a cyclical laggard into a high-margin growth story. Fiscal 2026 revenue is on track for massive expansion, with some analysts projecting full-year figures approaching or exceeding $70-80 billion in optimistic models. Free cash flow generation has enabled both aggressive capital spending — now projected above $25 billion for the year to fuel capacity growth — and shareholder returns via the dividend hike.

Advertisement

Still, risks remain inherent to the memory sector. While AI demand currently masks traditional cyclicality, any slowdown in hyperscaler capital expenditure, resolution of HBM4 technical bottlenecks across the industry or unexpected supply surges could pressure pricing. Micron’s heavy reliance on a concentrated customer base, including major AI players, introduces some concentration risk. Geopolitical tensions, export restrictions and the capital-intensive nature of fab expansions also warrant monitoring.

The stock’s rapid ascent has left valuations elevated by historical standards, though forward multiples remain reasonable given projected earnings growth. Shares have pulled back modestly from recent peaks near $471 but continue to attract momentum and growth-oriented investors.

Thursday’s gains built on a strong session earlier in the week, with elevated trading volume signaling sustained interest. By mid-afternoon, shares traded near $420.50, up about 3.4% on the day.

Micron executives expressed confidence in sustained fundamentals. With new manufacturing sites coming online gradually — meaningful contributions not expected until fiscal 2028 in some cases — supply constraints are likely to persist, supporting pricing power in the near to medium term.

Advertisement

As artificial intelligence spending by companies like Microsoft, Google, Meta and Amazon accelerates, with combined 2026 data center capex forecasts in the hundreds of billions, memory suppliers capable of delivering high-performance, power-efficient solutions are in the spotlight. Micron’s pivot toward AI-optimized products has decoupled it somewhat from broader PC and consumer cycles.

Upcoming fiscal third-quarter results, expected in late June, will be watched closely for further evidence of margin sustainability and any updates on HBM4 ramps or customer diversification. Analysts will scrutinize utilization rates, pricing trends and commentary on 2027 visibility.

For now, sentiment remains firmly bullish. Micron’s record backlog-like visibility in HBM, technological leadership and disciplined execution position it as a cornerstone player in the AI supply chain. Whether the current rally can extend further will depend on continued hyperscaler demand, successful capacity scaling and the broader trajectory of AI adoption.

Micron Technology, founded in 1978 and headquartered in Boise, employs tens of thousands worldwide. Its products power everything from smartphones and servers to the most advanced AI supercomputers. Once viewed primarily as a commodity memory maker, the company has emerged as a critical enabler of the artificial intelligence revolution.

Advertisement

With HBM capacity sold out for the year and explosive guidance pointing to another record quarter, Micron appears poised for what many describe as a multi-year growth phase — provided it can navigate the technical and supply challenges that define the high-stakes AI hardware race.

Continue Reading

Business

The Trade Desk Is Now A Deep Value Stock (NASDAQ:TTD)

Published

on

DoubleVerify Stock: Strong Retention, Attractive Valuation (NYSE:DV)

This article was written by

Julian Lin is a financial analyst. He finds undervalued companies with secular growth that appreciate over time. His approach is to look for companies with strong balance sheets and management teams in sectors with long growth runways.
Julian is the leader of the investing group Best Of Breed Growth Stocks where he only shares positions in stocks which have a large probability of delivering large alpha relative to the S&P 500. He also combines growth-oriented principles with strict valuation hurdles to add an additional layer to the conventional margin of safety. Features include: exclusive access to Julian’s highest conviction picks, full stock research reports, real-time trade alerts, macro market analysis, individual industry reports, a filtered watchlist, and community chat with access to Julian 24/7. Learn more.

Analyst’s Disclosure: I/we have a beneficial long position in the shares of TTD, META either through stock ownership, options, or other derivatives. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Seeking Alpha’s Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business

F&O watch: BSE gets Sebi nod to launch BSE Focused IT Index derivatives

Published

on

F&O watch: BSE gets Sebi nod to launch BSE Focused IT Index derivatives
Market regulator Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) has given approval to BSE to launch derivative contracts on the ‘BSE Focused IT Index’. BSE said in a regulatory filing on Thursday that details regarding the launch and contract specifications will be notified via separate exchange circulars.

The BSE Focused IT is a sector index that measures the performance of the 14 companies belonging to the Information Technology sector that are also BSE 500 firms.

The index constituents are Coforge, Cyient, HCL Technologies, Infosys, KPIT Technologies, LTIMindtree, Mphasis, Oracle Financial Services Software, Persistent Systems, Tata Consultancy Services (TCS), Tata Elxsi, Tata Technologies, Tech Mahindra and Wipro.

BSE Focused IT index was launched on October 7, 2024. The index has delivered negative 24% returns between January and March.

Advertisement

BSE shares ended 3% up on the NSE today at Rs 3,260 despite weak markets. Nifty plunged 222.25 points or 0.93% to finish at 23,775.10. Meanwhile, Sensex declined 947.22 points or 1.22% to settle at 76,615.68.


The stock also hit a fresh 52-week high of Rs 3,285.70. The capital market stock has seen a stellar run on the D-Street, delivering 76% returns in the past year. These returns came at a time when Indian markets faced multiple headwinds including rich valuations leading to FII outflows, tariff issues, a falling rupee and weak earnings. The latest setback for global markets including India has been the Iran-Israel war.
BSE shares are currently trading above their 50-day and 200-day simple moving averages (SMAs) of Rs 2,851 and Rs 2,609, respectively.The multibagger counter has delivered 2,070% returns in the past three years.

Also read: Why FPI interest in India ‘has pretty much died out’: Nithin Kamath points to valuations, taxes and global alternatives

(Disclaimer: The recommendations, suggestions, views, and opinions given by the experts are their own. These do not represent the views of The Economic Times.)

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025