Connect with us

Technology

Canon set a new record with its 410-megapixel 35mm camera sensor

Published

on

Canon set a new record with its 410-megapixel 35mm camera sensor

The megapixel race isn’t over if you ask Canon. Today, the company announced a new 35mm full-frame CMOS sensor with a resolution of 410 megapixels. That’s 24,592 x 16,704 pixels and a resolution that’s equivalent to 24K — or 12 times the resolution of 8K and 198 times the resolution of HD.

It’s the ”largest number of pixels ever achieved in a 35mm full-frame sensor,” according to Canon, but don’t expect the company to introduce it on its consumer-ready digital cameras. It’s designed for surveillance, medicine, and other industrial “applications that demand extreme resolution,” and don’t mind paying a small fortune for it.

Thanks to a “redesigned circuitry pattern” and a newly developed “back-illuminated stacked formation in which the pixel segment and signal processing segment are interlayered,” Canon says the sensor has a readout speed of “3,280 megapixels per second,” allowing full-resolution images to be captured at eight frames per second.

Canon will also offer a monochrome version of the sensor with a “four-pixel binning” function that improves low-light sensitivity by treating four nearby pixels as one. Although that reduces its overall resolution, it allows the monochromatic version of the sensor to capture 100-megapixel videos at 24 frames per second.

Advertisement

If you want to maximize your megapixels, you typically need to turn to medium-format or larger sensors and bigger cameras. The Phase One XF IQ4 150MP, for example, can capture images at 150-megapixels. But by putting this much resolution into a 35mm sensor that will be compatible with a wide range of lenses already available for full-frame cameras, Canon says it will help “contribute to the miniaturization of shooting equipment.”

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Technology

Google buys part of HTC’s XR business for $250 million

Published

on

Google buys part of HTC's virtual reality unit for $250 million

Google has agreed to acquire a part of HTC’s extended reality (XR) business for $250 million, expanding its push into virtual and augmented reality hardware following the recent launch of its Android XR platform.

The deal involves transferring some of the HTC VIVE engineering staff to Google and granting non-exclusive intellectual property rights, according to the Taiwanese firm. HTC will retain rights to use and develop the technology.

The transaction marks the second major deal between the companies after Google’s $1.1 billion purchase of HTC’s smartphone unit in 2017.

Google said the acquisition will accelerate Android XR platform development across headsets and glasses. The move comes as tech giants race to establish dominance in XR technology, with Apple and Meta maintaining their lead in the virtual reality market.

Advertisement

Google and HTC will explore additional collaboration opportunities, they said.

Source link

Continue Reading

Technology

Canon’s new RF 16-28mm F2.8 wide-angle zoom lens impressed me, but I’m less convinced we need it

Published

on

Canon RF 16-28mm F2.8 IS STM lens in the hand

  • It’s an ultra-wide zoom lens designed for full-frame cameras like the Canon EOS R8
  • Practically identical design to the RF 28-70mm F2.8 IS STM
  • A £1,249 list price – we’ll confirm US and Australia pricing asap

Canon has unveiled its latest ultra-wide angle zoom lens for it’s full-frame mirrorless cameras, the RF 16-28mm F2.8 IS STM, and I got a proper feel for it during a hands-on session hosted by Canon ahead of its launch.

It features a bright maximum F2.8 aperture across its entire 16-28mm range, and is a much more compact and affordable option for enthusiasts than Canon’s pro RF 15-35mm F2.8L IS USM lens. Consider the 16-28mm a sensible match for Canon’s beginner and mid-range full-frame cameras instead, such as the EOS R8.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Technology

Scale AI is facing a third worker lawsuit in about a month 

Published

on

Alexandr Wang, co-founder and chief executive officer of Scale AI Inc., stands for a photograph after a Bloomberg Technology television interview in San Francisco, California, U.S., on Thursday, Aug. 8, 2019. Wang spoke about how Scale AI is using artificial intelligence to improve the safety of self-driving cars. Photographer: David Paul Morris/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Scale AI is facing its ​​third lawsuit over alleged labor practices in just over a month, this time from workers claiming they suffered psychological trauma from reviewing disturbing content without adequate safeguards.

Scale, which was valued at $13.8 billion last year, relies on workers it categorizes as contractors to do tasks like rating AI model responses.

Earlier this month, a former worker sued alleging she was effectively paid below the minimum wage and misclassified as a contractor. A complaint alleging similar issues was also filed in December 2024.

This latest complaint, filed January 17 in the Northern District of California, is a class action complaint that focuses on the psychological harms allegedly suffered by six people who worked on Scale’s platform Outlier.

Advertisement

The plaintiffs claim they were forced to write disturbing prompts about violence and abuse — including child abuse — without proper psychological support, suffering retaliation when they sought mental health counsel. They say they were misled about the job’s nature during hiring and ended up with mental health issues like PTSD due to their work. They are seeking the creation of a medical monitoring program along with new safety standards, plus unspecified damages and attorney fees.

One of the plaintiffs, Steve McKinney, is the lead plaintiff in that separate December 2024 complaint against Scale. The same law firm, Clarkson Law Firm of Malibu, California, is representing plaintiffs in both complaints.

Clarkson Law Firm previously filed a class action suit against OpenAI and Microsoft over allegedly using stolen data — a suit that was dismissed after being criticized by a district judge for its length and content. Referencing that case, Joe Osborne, a spokesperson for Scale AI, criticized Clarkson Law Firm and said Scale plans “to defend ourselves vigorously.”

“Clarkson Law Firm has previously — and unsuccessfully — gone after innovative tech companies with legal claims that were summarily dismissed in court. A federal court judge found that one of their previous complaints was ‘needlessly long’ and contained ‘largely irrelevant, distracting, or redundant information,’” Osborne told TechCrunch.

Advertisement

Osborne said that Scale complies with all laws and regulations and has “numerous safeguards in place” to protect its contributors like the ability to opt-out at any time, advanced notice of sensitive content, and access to health and wellness programs. Osborne added that Scale does not take on projects that may include child sexual abuse material. 

In response, Glenn Danas, partner at Clarkson Law Firm, told TechCrunch that Scale AI has been “forcing workers to view gruesome and violent content to train these AI models” and has failed to ensure a safe workplace.

“We must hold these big tech companies like Scale AI accountable or workers will continue to be exploited to train this unregulated technology for profit,” Danas said. 

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Technology

Samsung’s clever new ‘Circle to Search’ trick could help you figure out that song that is stuck in your head

Published

on

'Circle to Search' on a Galaxy S25 Ultra can now identify a song you sing, hum, or play.

  • A new ‘Circle to Search’ trick is available on Samsung’s latest Galaxy phones
  • It lets you sing or hum songs that you want to identify
  • The feature worked well in our early hands-on demos

Sure, Shazam and the Google Assistant, or even Gemini, can help you identify a song that’s playing in a coffee shop or while you’re out and about. But what about that tune you have stuck in your head that you’re desperate to put a name to?

Suffice it to say, that’s not a problem I have for anything by Springsteen, but it does happen for other songs, and Samsung’s latest and greatest – the Galaxy S25, S25 Plus, and S25 Ultra – might just be able to cure this. It’s courtesy of the latest expansion of Google’s Circle to Search on devices.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Technology

Samsung Galaxy S25 vs. S25 Plus vs. S25 Ultra: specs comparison

Published

on

Samsung Galaxy S25 vs. S25 Plus vs. S25 Ultra: specs comparison

During its latest Unpacked event, Samsung dished all the details on the Galaxy S25 lineup. The Galaxy S25 and S25 Plus start at $799.99 and $999.99, respectively, while the S25 Ultra runs a cool $1299.99 in its entry-level configuration. You can preorder the phones ahead of their launch on February 7th, but before you do, you’re probably wondering what’s new.

The phones don’t look or feel much different, save for the slightly curvier Galaxy S25 Ultra. The Snapdragon Elite 8 is perhaps the S25 family’s most notable hardware upgrade, which is up to 40 percent faster than the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset and comes with a new neural processing unit to support Samsung’s expanded Galaxy AI experience. The company introduced multimodal and generative AI improvements, after all, and the Galaxy S25 line will be among the first to usher in new Google Gemini features.

Our reviews are still forthcoming, and it’s much too early for us to determine whether any of these phones are actually worth upgrading for. But that doesn’t mean we can’t distill their differences to help you determine which device you’d rather buy. Keep reading for a full breakdown of all of the hardware and software changes, the unique traits of each Galaxy S25 device, and a closer look at their specs — plus their counterparts from last year.

Design

Advertisement

In terms of shape and size, it’s hard to tell the Galaxy S25 and S25 Plus from their last-gen counterparts. But the S25 Ultra looks a bit different than the S24 Ultra with its subtly rounded corners and flat edges, which are more visually aligned with the smaller phones. It’s the thinnest and lightest Ultra yet, even if only by a hair. And the Ultra-exclusive S Pen is back, albeit without gestures and the remote shutter feature.

The Galaxy S25 Ultra now looks like it belongs with the rest of the family.
Photo by Chris Welch / The Verge

Samsung says the aluminum frame on the Galaxy S25 and S25 Plus features at least one recycled component. Both sandwich their components between slabs of Corning’s Gorilla Glass Victus 2, but the Ultra uses a titanium frame and a display that’s protected by Corning Gorilla Armor 2. It’s a ceramic-infused material said to be stronger than typical tempered glass with antireflective and scratch-resistant properties. (The rear still uses Victus 2.)

Samsung also tweaked the design of the camera modules on all three phones, adding a thicker bordering hump with a bolder aesthetic. The S25 and S25 Plus come in several new color options, too, including an “icy” blue and a new mint green to help them stand apart, as well as navy and silver for a more traditional aesthetic. Three more colors will be available exclusively from Samsung.com: black, red, and rose gold.

Advertisement

The Ultra has its own set of titanium colors, including black, gray, and silverish hues of blue and white. If you order the Ultra from Samsung.com, you’ll also be able to choose from rose gold, black, and green.

Storage and RAM

The Samsung Galaxy S25 series is available with largely the same memory and storage options as the previous models, except all three models now start with 12GB of RAM. You can get the base Galaxy S25 with 128GB or 256GB of storage, while the Plus starts with 256GB of storage with a 512GB option. The Ultra, meanwhile, offers the same starting configurations as the Plus, along with a 1TB configuration.

Processor

Advertisement

All three Galaxy S25 phones use a Snapdragon 8 Elite chipset — no matter where in the world you’re purchasing from. The processor uses an Oryon CPU similar to the ones you’ll find in newer Qualcomm laptops.

The 3nm chip has two “prime” cores and six performance cores with a dedicated “Hexagon” neural processing unit that supports multimodal AI capabilities with 40 percent faster efficiency compared to the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3. The added headroom allows support for more on-device AI functions, including Generative Edit. Many of these features should generally work faster without the added overhead of server-side processing.

Overall, Samsung claims the Snapdragon 8 Elite offers 37 percent faster CPU performance and 30 percent faster GPU performance for gaming, at least compared to the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 it’s replacing. That being said, we can’t yet discern how that translates in practice.

Display

Advertisement

All three Galaxy S25 phones have rounded displays this time.
Photo: Allison Johnson / The Verge

The Dynamic AMOLED displays on the Galaxy S25 smartphones are largely unchanged compared to the previous generation. The base Galaxy S25 still has a 6.2-inch Full HD Plus display, while the 6.7-inch display on the Galaxy S25 Plus remains Quad HD Plus.

The S25 Ultra’s display is slightly larger than last year’s at 6.9 inches — a 0.1-inch increase to make up for the slight curve — with the same QHD Plus resolution. All three still support a maximum 120Hz variable refresh rate.

Cameras

Advertisement

The Galaxy S25 and S25 Plus have the same three rear cameras, including a 50-megapixel wide sensor, a 12-megapixel ultrawide option, and a 10-megapixel telephoto sensor. Meanwhile, the Galaxy S25 Ultra offers four total rear cameras, including a main 200-megapixel wide-angle camera, a new 50-megapixel ultrawide camera with macro mode (up from the S24 Ultra’s 12-megapixel), a 50-megapixel telephoto sensor with 5x optical zoom, and a 12-megapixel sensor for 3x zoom. All still use the same 12-megapixel front camera.

The new camera borders are bold, but there aren’t many changes under the glass.
Photo by Dominic Preston / The Verge

Recording options are largely similar across the board, with all three Galaxy S25 models supporting 8K resolution at up to 30 frames per second on their main wide-angle sensors and 4K at up to 60 frames per second for all cameras. However, the Galaxy S25 Ultra supports 4K at up to 120 frames per second.

Samsung now enables 10-bit HDR recording by default on all S25 phones, and they retain the Log color profile option for advanced color grading. The cameras picked up other software-enabled tricks, too, including the Audio Eraser feature first seen in Pixel phones. That feature lets you choose and isolate specific sounds — including voices, music, and wind — with the option to lower the rest or mute them entirely.

Advertisement

There’s also a new Virtual Aperture feature in Expert RAW, allowing you to adjust your footage’s depth of field after recording. There’s a new suite of filters inspired by iconic film looks, too.

Samsung says its new ProScaler feature on the Galaxy S25 Plus and Ultra offers 40 percent better upscaling compared to the Galaxy S24’s based on its signal-to-noise ratio. Since that feature requires QHD Plus resolution, you won’t find it on the base Galaxy S25.

Battery

Like the Galaxy S24 line, the Galaxy S25, S25 Plus, and S25 Ultra use 4,000mAh, 4,900mAh, and 5,000mAh batteries, respectively. That being said, Samsung says they offer the longest battery life of any Galaxy phones to date, largely thanks to hardware and software efficiency improvements.

Advertisement

Fast charging over USB-C returns in all three, of course, but they’re now also “Qi2 Ready.” That means there are no magnets embedded directly in the devices — which is the case with Apple’s latest handsets — but you will be able to obtain 15W wireless charging speeds when paired with Samsung’s magnetic Qi2 Ready cases. That should effectively enable you to use magnetic Qi2 chargers with Samsung Galaxy S25 devices.

Android 15, One UI 7, and Galaxy AI

The Galaxy S25’s launch is less about the hardware and more an opportunity to introduce One UI 7, its AI-heavy take on Android 15. While there are several visual tweaks, the bigger change is in Galaxy AI’s expanded granularity and cohesiveness.

Gemini already seems far more useful than Bixby.
Photo by Dominic Preston / The Verge
Advertisement

Both Samsung and Google are introducing new multimodal AI features with the Galaxy S25’s launch. Google Gemini Live will launch first on the Galaxy S25, for example, though it will eventually come to the Galaxy S24 and Google Pixel 9. It’s a full-fledged conversational AI companion that’s now the default assistant when long-pressing the home button. (Bixby is still available in its own app.)

Gemini Live supports natural language commands for generative tasks and on-device functions. You can feed it images and files to facilitate requests, and it can dive into multiple apps to help complete them.

You can also get more personalized daily summaries with Now Brief, which is accessible directly from the lockscreen’s new Now Bar (which feels similar to the iPhone’s Dynamic Island). You’ll also notice a redesigned AI Select menu (which you may remember as Smart Select), 20 supported languages for on-device translations, call transcriptions directly within the dialer, and more. Most of these changes should port to older Galaxy flagships, but we’re not yet sure whether all of them will.

By the numbers

Advertisement

No, you’re not experiencing deja vu — the Galaxy S25 smartphones feel largely familiar on paper, as our comparison chart below illustrates. Outside the processor bump, the hardware differences are pretty minor compared to Samsung’s last-gen phones.

The software changes are the most significant upgrades this year, but many of those features will come to older phones, too, thanks to the now-customary seven years of OS updates you’ll get when purchasing a flagship Galaxy phone. Check out the full specs below to see how exactly these devices compare.

Related:

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Technology

Raymond Tonsing’s Caffeinated Capital seeks $400M for fifth fund

Published

on

women-led funds, venture capital, startups

Caffeinated Capital, a San Francisco venture firm started by a solo capitalist Raymond Tonsing, is raising a fifth fund of $400 million, according to a regulatory filing.

The firm, an early investor in software company Airtable and defense startup Saronic, has already raised $160 million toward the fund. If Caffeinated hits its target, it will be the 15-year-old firm’s largest capital haul date. Although the outfit didn’t announce its previous fund, PitchBook data estimates that Caffeinated closed its fund four with a total of $209 million in commitments.

Although Tonsing was Caffeinated’s only general partner until four years ago, Varun Gupta, who led data science and machine learning at Affirm, joined him as a second general partner in 2020.

Tonsing was an early investor in Affirm, a buy-now-pay-later platform that went public in 2021. The firm’s other notable exits include A/B testing startup Optimizely, which PitchBook estimates was sold for $600 million in 2020.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Technology

NYT Strands today — my hints, answers and spangram for Thursday, January 23 (game #326)

Published

on

NYT Strands today — my hints, answers and spangram for Tuesday, December 17 (game #289)

Strands is the NYT’s latest word game after the likes of Wordle, Spelling Bee and Connections – and it’s great fun. It can be difficult, though, so read on for my Strands hints.

Want more word-based fun? Then check out my NYT Connections today and Quordle today pages for hints and answers for those games, and Marc’s Wordle today page for the original viral word game.

Source link

Continue Reading

Technology

A Samsung integration helps make Google’s Gemini the AI assistant to beat

Published

on

A Samsung integration helps make Google’s Gemini the AI assistant to beat

One of the most important changes in Samsung’s new phones is a simple one: when you long-press the side button on your phone, instead of activating Samsung’s own Bixby assistant by default, you’ll get Google Gemini

This is probably a good thing. Bixby was never a very good virtual assistant — Samsung originally built it primarily as a way to more simply navigate device settings, not to get information from the internet. It has gotten better since and can now do standard assistant things like performing visual searches and setting timers, but it never managed to catch up to the likes of Alexa, Google Assistant, and now, even Siri. So, if you’re a Samsung user, this is good news! Your assistant is probably better now. (And if, for some unknown reason, you really do truly love Bixby, don’t worry: there’s still an app.)

The switch to Gemini is an even bigger deal for Google. Google was caught off guard a couple of years ago when ChatGPT launched but has caught up in a big way. According to recent reporting from The Wall Street Journal, CEO Sundar Pichai now believes Gemini has surpassed ChatGPT, and he wants Google to have 500 million users by the end of this year. It might just get there one Samsung phone at a time.

Gemini is now a front-and-center feature on the world’s most popular Android phones, and millions upon millions of people will likely start to use it more — or use it at all — now that it’s so accessible. For Google, which is essentially betting that Gemini is the future of every single one of its products, that brings a hugely important new set of users and interactions. All that data makes Gemini better, which makes it more useful, which makes it more popular. Which makes it better again.

Advertisement

Right now, Google appears to be well ahead of its competitors in one important way: Gemini is the most capable virtual assistant on the market right now, and it’s not particularly close. It’s not that Gemini is specifically great; it’s just that it has more access to more information and more users than anyone else. This race is still in its early stages, and no AI product is very good yet — but Google knows better than anyone that if you can be everywhere, you can get good really fast. That worked so well with search that it got Google into antitrust trouble. This time, at least so far, it seems like Google’s going to have an even easier time taking over the market.

It’s not that Gemini is specifically great; it’s just that it has more access to more information and more users than anyone else

For years, there were three meaningful players in the virtual assistant space. Amazon’s Alexa, Google’s Assistant, and Apple’s Siri all offered similar features and were similarly accessible through speakers and phones and wearables. But now? The much-hyped, AI-first “Remarkable Alexa” is, by all accounts, massively delayed and massively underpowered. The latest versions of Siri shipped with a wackier animation and seemingly no new smarts or capabilities. 

There are other ascendant AI assistants, of course. ChatGPT, Claude, Grok, and Copilot all have strong underlying models, and some share the same multimodal capabilities as Gemini. There are lots of good reasons to pick them or even something like Perplexity over Gemini. But they’re missing the most important thing: distribution. They’re apps you have to download, log in to, and open every time. Gemini is a button you can press — and that’s a big difference. There’s a reason OpenAI is reportedly working on everything from a web browser to a Jony Ive-designed ChatGPT gadget: the built-in options usually win.

Advertisement

The built-in options are also the ones that tend to have the best integration across the platform, which might be the whole ball game. Gemini can already change settings on your phone and, with new upgrades, can even do things across apps — grabbing information from your email and dumping it into a text message draft, just to name one example. Because of the way iOS and Android are architected, no other assistant has this kind of access — and again, there’s no indication that Siri’s ever going to be as good as it needs to be. If the future of assistants is this kind of agentic, using-your-apps-for-you behavior, Google’s inherent advantage might be insurmountable. 

Google is practically spoiled for places to put Gemini

Meanwhile, Google is practically spoiled for places to put Gemini. The company recently announced that all paying Workspace customers will get Gemini access. You can access Gemini with one click from your Gmail inbox or summon it with one keystroke in Docs. And the underlying tech is even more pervasive. You can use Gemini to find stuff on YouTube and in Drive, and practically every time you search, a Gemini-powered AI Overview appears at the top of your results. “Today, all seven of our products and platforms with more than two billion monthly users use Gemini models,” Pichai said on Google’s earnings call last fall. (Fun fact: the word “gemini” appears 29 times in that earnings call transcript, only three fewer than “search.”) 

When it comes to how people actually encounter and interact with these models, though, the phone is still the AI device of choice. And that’s where Google has maybe its largest advantage. “Gemini’s deep integration is improving Android,” Pichai said on that earnings call. “For example, Gemini Live lets you have free-flowing conversations with Gemini; people love it.” For now, smartphones are the most compelling AI devices, and Google can integrate its systems unlike any other. Apple, scrambling to play catch-up with the iPhone, had to launch an awkward handoff with ChatGPT just so Siri could answer more questions. 

Advertisement

All of these assistants, including Gemini, still have lots of limitations. They lie; they misunderstand; they lack the necessary integrations to do even some of the basic things Alexa and Assistant have been able to do for years. The Gemini models still occasionally do ridiculous, deal-breaking things like tell people to eat rocks and generate diverse founding fathers. But if you believe the AI era is coming, or is maybe even here, then there is nothing more important right now than getting your AI platform in front of users. People are developing new habits, learning new systems, developing new relationships with their virtual assistants. The more entrenched we become, the less likely we will be to dump our AI friend for another one. 

ChatGPT had the first-mover advantage and captured the world’s imagination by showing just how compelling an AI chatbot could be. But Google has the distribution. It can put its sparkly icon in front of practically the entire population of the internet every single day, across a huge range of products, and get the kind of data and feedback it needs to eventually do this well. Even as it fights in court over how powerful its default status made it in search, Google is executing the same playbook with AI. And it’s working again.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Technology

Some shareholders of a16z-backed Divvy Homes may not see a dime from $1B sale

Published

on

A house of cards collapsing on dark background

The $1 billion acquisition of rent-to-own startup Divvy Homes, which was announced Wednesday, is expected to leave some shareholders without a payout, according to sources familiar with the deal. 

The terms — and Divvy’s journey from buzzy startup to acquisition target — reflects the rollercoaster ride the proptech industry has endured over the past decade.

The San Francisco-based startup, founded in 2016, had raised more than $700 million in debt and equity from well-known investors such as Tiger Global Management, GGV Capital, and Andreessen Horowitz (a16z), among others. By 2021, the company was valued at $2.3 billion.

And while the Brookfield Properties purchase of Divvy for $1 billion was at half of its peak valuation, the acquisition could still be considered a win in an industry that has had a string of shutdowns and bankruptcies. 

Advertisement

However, it’s a loss for some shareholders, according to a letter from Divvy CEO and co-founder Adena Hefets, which was viewed by TechCrunch. 

“If the transaction closes, Divvy will sell substantially all of its assets, namely its home portfolio and brand, to Brookfield for approximately $1 billion. However, after repaying its outstanding indebtedness, transaction costs, and liquidation preference to preferred shareholders, we unfortunately estimate that neither common shareholders nor holders of the Series FF preferred stock will receive any consideration,” according to the letter, which was sent to shareholders, former employees, and “Divvy supporters.”

FF preferred stock, also known as Founders Preferred Stock, is a type of stock that is issued to founders of a company. The law firm Cooley defines the shares as being issued to founders “at the time of incorporation in order to facilitate sales of stock by founders in connection with future equity financings.”  

TechCrunch has reached out to Hefets and Divvy Homes for comment and will update the article with any response.

Advertisement

Another source told TechCrunch that equity holders “got zero’d” so “founders, employees and VCs” will get “nothing” from the sale. The identity of the source, who asked to remain anonymous, has been verified by TechCrunch.

Divvy operated a rent-to-own model in which it worked with renters who wanted to become homeowners by buying the home they wanted and renting it back to them for three years while they built “the savings needed to own it themselves,” it said.

The company ran into some hiccups when mortgage interest rates began to surge in 2022, leading it to conduct three known rounds of layoffs in a year’s time. Divvy’s last known funding occurred in August 2021 — a $200 million Series D funding led by Tiger Global Management and Caffeinated Capital. The Series D round was announced just six months after a $110 million Series C

Hefets also shared in the letter the “decision to sell wasn’t easy” and “came after a thorough review of Divvy’s strategic alternatives … and with significant deliberation around our options.” 

Advertisement

She said the move followed “years of fighting difficult market conditions, including rising interest rates, and making as many cost cuts as possible.”

As the company looked into what lay ahead in 2025, it decided the best way forward was to sell its “portfolio of homes now and return as much capital as possible to shareholders.”

“With almost a decade of pouring myself into this company, and believing in this mission, this was not the ending I had hoped for…While I am not proud of the financial outcome, I am proud of the impact we had on our customers’ lives,” Hefets added.

Want more fintech news in your inbox? Sign up for TechCrunch Fintech here.

Advertisement

Want to reach out with a tip? Email me at maryann@techcrunch.com or send me a message on Signal at 408.204.3036. You can also send a note to the whole TechCrunch crew at tips@techcrunch.com. For more secure communications, click here to contact us, which includes SecureDrop and links to encrypted messaging apps.

Source link

Continue Reading

Technology

Quordle today – my hints and answers for Thursday, January 23 (game #1095)

Published

on

Quordle today – my hints and answers for Tuesday, December 17 (game #1058)

Quordle was one of the original Wordle alternatives and is still going strong now more than 1,000 games later. It offers a genuine challenge, though, so read on if you need some Quordle hints today – or scroll down further for the answers.

Enjoy playing word games? You can also check out my NYT Connections today and NYT Strands today pages for hints and answers for those puzzles, while Marc’s Wordle today column covers the original viral word game.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025 WordupNews