Crypto World
Aave’s “Civil War” Claims First Casualty as Key Developer Walks Away
A long-running governance dispute inside the Aave ecosystem has escalated after a core engineering firm announced it will step aside.
Key Takeaways:
- Core developer BGD will not renew its contract, deepening a governance dispute between Aave DAO and Aave Labs.
- The conflict centers on plans to push users from Aave v3 to the upcoming v4 upgrade.
- The announcement rattled the market, with the Aave token dropping over 6%.
Bored Ghosts Developing (BGD), a software company contracted by Aave DAO to build and maintain key components of the lending protocol, said Friday it will not renew its agreement when the current term expires in April.
In a post on Aave’s governance forum, the team blamed Aave Labs, the company founded by protocol creator Stani Kulechov, for pushing a strategic shift tied to the upcoming Aave v4 upgrade.
Aave Developer Refuses to Support V3 Amid Push Toward V4
BGD said it could not continue work on Aave v3 while efforts were underway to steer users toward the new version.
“We believe even proposing this on the main revenue-maker & fully functional engine of Aave is borderline outrageous,” the group wrote.
The market reacted quickly. The Aave token fell more than 6% following the announcement.
Kulechov acknowledged the departure, writing on social media that the team had played a critical role in the protocol’s development.
BGD co-founder Ernesto Boado previously served as chief technology officer at Aave Labs.
“Aave V3 would not be what it is today without their contributions,” Kulechov said. Delegate Marc Zeller called the move “devastating,” noting that much of the platform’s revenue depends on BGD’s code.
Aave, with more than $26 billion in user deposits, is the largest decentralized finance lending protocol.
It is governed by tokenholders through a DAO structure, but tensions have been building for months over the role of Aave Labs and control of the brand.
Delegates recently sought to transfer brand assets, including naming rights, social media accounts and the aave.com website, from Labs to the DAO, though the proposal narrowly failed.
Labs later offered to redirect revenue from Aave-branded services to the DAO but tied the plan to recognizing Aave v4 as the project’s future technical foundation.
That clause alarmed BGD, which described Aave v3 as the ecosystem’s “crown jewel” and warned that altering lending parameters could pressure users to migrate prematurely.
Aave Labs Says V3 Will Remain Supported With No Immediate Migration
Aave Labs said there is no immediate timeline for migration and that v3 will remain supported. Kulechov added the company can assume maintenance duties if needed, and that the protocol will continue operating normally.
BGD’s contract ends April 1. The firm has offered a short-term transition arrangement to help the DAO find a replacement, marking the first tangible break in what was once viewed as one of DeFi’s most stable governance models.
Meanwhile, the US Securities and Exchange Commission formally concluded its multi-year investigation into the Aave Protocol without recommending any enforcement action.
The action ends nearly four years of regulatory uncertainty surrounding one of decentralized finance’s most widely used lending platforms.
The post Aave’s “Civil War” Claims First Casualty as Key Developer Walks Away appeared first on Cryptonews.
Decentralized identity protocol IoTeX has confirmed that it is investigating unusual activity tied to one of its token safes after onchain analysts flagged a possible security incident.
In a Saturday post on X, the project said its team was “fully engaged, working around the clock to assess and contain the situation.” IoTeX added that early estimates indicate the potential loss is lower than circulating rumors and that it has coordinated with major exchanges and security partners to trace and freeze funds linked to the attacker.
“The situation is under control. We will continue to monitor closely and provide timely updates to the community,” the project said.
IoTeX’s native token (IOTX) dropped following the incident, with the price sliding more than 8% over 24 hours to around $0.0049, according to data from CoinMarketCap.
Related: CertiK links $63M in Tornado Cash deposits to $282M wallet compromise
Analyst says compromised key drained $4.3 million
The response came after onchain investigator Specter claimed a private key connected to the safe may have been compromised.
The onchain sleuth revealed that the wallet was drained of several tokens, including USDC (USDC), USDt (USDT), IoTeX (IOTX) and wrapped Bitcoin (WBTC), with losses estimated at roughly $4.3 million. The stolen funds were reportedly swapped into Ether (ETH), and about 45 ETH was bridged to Bitcoin.
The analyst also published addresses associated with the suspected attacker, alongside transaction records showing rapid movements through decentralized exchanges and token swaps. The activity suggested an attempt to convert assets quickly and move them across chains to complicate recovery efforts.
Related: SwapNet exploit drains up to $13.3M from Matcha Meta users
Most crypto projects don’t recover from hacks
As Cointelegraph reported, nearly 80% of crypto projects hit by major hacks struggle to recover, largely due to mismanaged responses rather than the immediate financial damage, according to Web3 security leaders. Immunefi CEO Mitchell Amador said many teams are unprepared for breaches, leading to delayed decisions and poor communication during the crucial early hours, which worsens losses and shakes user confidence.
Even after technical fixes are implemented, the reputational impact can linger. Kerberus CEO Alex Katz noted that serious exploits often result in users withdrawing funds, declining liquidity and long-term credibility damage that projects rarely overcome.
Magazine: How crypto laws changed in 2025 — and how they’ll change in 2026
19 Febuary 2026
Key Takeaways
- Major cryptocurrencies declined even though there was an increase in Asian and U.S. stock markets based on technology.
- Weakness was attributed to the appreciation of the dollar and insecurities regarding interest rate policy of the Federal Reserve.
- Crypto rallies are not sustained since market demand is very poor and unreliable.
- Gold is still doing well as a safe haven, which undermines the bitcoin story of digital gold.
Large cryptocurrencies lost ground on Thursday, Ether, XRP, and Solana performed the worst, despite the rise of Asian and U.S. equities after a fresh surge in technology stocks optimism. Market data indicated that bitcoin was trading close to $66,700, about 1.7 per cent below in 24 hours whereas ether fell to approximately $1,965. XRP dropped almost 5 percent, Solana fell nearly 4 percent and BNB and Dogecoin were also trading in the red which is an indication of widespread weakness and not a token issue.
The pullback was achieved against the improvement of regional equities. Asian markets saw gains in thin holiday trading, which Asian markets were boosted by strength in technology stocks, and U.S. stocks regained their footing following the signing of a multi-year deal by Nvidia to provide AI chips to Meta Platforms. Regional indices followed by MSCI had recorded slight improvements, indicating the improvement in sentiment in the traditional markets.
Crypto, nevertheless, was not a part of the rally. Rebounds of prices in the recent past have been there in a few seconds and there have been consistent selling pressures anytime the momentum is lost. Although the market has ceased to break sharply as it was the case at the beginning of the year, it is also not performing at the current spot level that can sustain a more permanent recovery.
One of the factors that have contributed to the weakness is the stronger U.S. dollar, which strengthened following minutes presented by the Federal Reserve, which stated that policymakers were not in a rush to reduce the interest rates. Certain authorities even indicated that there would be potential increases in case inflation would be intractable. The stronger dollar generally squeezes the liquidity of the world, which puts a heavy burden on risk assets like crypto-currencies.
Conversely, gold has remained relatively strong as investors look to its conventional safe havens amid confusion on geopolitics, monetary policy and inflation. This schism has deepened the controversy around the long-standing bitcoin story of digital gold because the cryptocurrency continues to be even more volatile than the precious metal during macro stress.
Alex Tsepaev, the chief strategy officer of B2PRIME Group, says the resilience of gold can be explained by the fact that investors want to be simple in unstable markets.
“I believe that gold will continue to be a default haven and will probably attempt to break through the tough $5,000–$5,100 ceiling. That said, once risk appetite returns, ETF flows stabilize, and U.S. regulations stop dragging, Bitcoin may recover considerably more quickly,” he said
“After all, Bitcoin attracts liquidity faster than gold, partly because it’s still sometimes referred to as a speculative asset.”
In the meantime, geopolitical risks are also in the spotlight due to the continued U.S.-Iran tensions accompanied by the high oil prices. It is against this background that cryptocurrencies are stuck between a series of relief rallies and a yet not fully conducive macroeconomic environment to maintain a long-term upside.
In the meantime, traders seem conservative. Interest rate uncertainty, a strong dollar, and traditional havens among investors are still head winds on crypto markets, as global equities sentiment improves, even though increasingly.
European Central Bank (ECB) president Christine Lagarde is stepping down sometime before the French presidential election next year.
Under her leadership, the ECB has consulted on the Markets in Crypto Assets (MiCA) legislation that defined the crypto landscape in the European Union. The preeminent European bank also began work on the digital euro — the next iteration of the Eurozone’s currency.
But there is still work to be done on crypto policy in Europe. MiCA does not, in its current form, regulate decentralized finance (DeFi), and policymakers at the ECB are still deliberating over the digital euro’s final details.
While the exact timing of Lagarde’s departure has not yet been determined, observers are already speculating about who will take her place and how it will affect crypto policy in Europe.
Lagarde was a crypto-skeptic, critical of stablecoins
Like many central bankers, Lagarde has been cautious at best when it comes to cryptocurrencies. In 2022, she said regarding crypto, “My very humble assessment is that it is worth nothing.”
“It is based on nothing … There is no underlying asset to act as an anchor of safety.”
She said that crypto should be regulated, citing concern that investors did not understand the risks associated with crypto investing and would “lose it all.”
This set the tone for the ECB consultations on MiCA that would follow. The ECB itself does not create laws, but throughout the legislative process, the ECB advised, observed and offered comments, particularly over areas related to monetary policy and payments regulations.
Even after MiCA was passed, Lagarde advocated for tight regulations on stablecoins and aligning international standards. In September 2025, she called on lawmakers in Europe to provide safeguards for stablecoins and equivalence for foreign stablecoin issuers to prevent the risk of stablecoin runs.
“European legislation should ensure that such schemes cannot operate in the EU unless supported by robust equivalence regimes in other jurisdictions and safeguards relating to the transfer of assets between the EU and non-EU entities,” she said.
“This also highlights why international cooperation is indispensable. Without a level global playing field, risks will always seek the path of least resistance.”
She further stated that stablecoins are a threat to national sovereignty and turn money from a public good into a privately controlled enterprise.
“When stablecoins are left unchecked, we risk creating a system in which money is controlled by the private sector. That is not the mandate we were appointed to serve as public servants.”
Demand for digital cash and the euro
While a noted crypto skeptic, Lagarde acknowledged the demand for digital currencies back in 2021. In an interview that year at the World Economic Forum, Lagarde said, “If customers prefer to use digital currencies rather than have banknotes and cash available, it should be available.”
“We should respond to that demand and have a solution that is European based, that is secure, that is available, and friendly terms that can be used as a means of payment.” At the ECB level, this response took the form of the digital euro.
But the wheels of Brussels do not turn quickly. The investigation phase for a digital euro began all the way back in October 2021. In October 2025, the ECB completed the preparation phase when its governing council decided to start preparing for issuance.
The digital euro has faced harsh criticism, namely that it will give central banks yet another tool to monitor consumer behavior, control spending and eradicate anonymous transactions. There have also been concerns over offline operability and overreliance on digital systems.
The ECB claims that the digital euro will have strict privacy standards and that it will bring all the same benefits of cash to the digital monetary space. In October 2025, Lagarde said that the ECB wants to make the euro “fit for the future, redesigning and modernising our banknotes and preparing for the issuance of digital cash.”
Her colleague, ECB executive board member Piero Cipollone, iterated that the digital euro “will ensure that people enjoy the benefits of cash also in the digital era. In doing so, it will enhance the resilience of Europe’s payment landscape, lower costs for merchants, and create a platform for private companies to innovate, scale up and compete.”
New ECB frontrunners unlikely to depart from cautious stance
Lagarde’s decision to step down comes at a politically fraught time. Leaving before the next French presidential election will allow President Emmanuel Macron to participate in picking her replacement.
France is the second-largest economy in the EU, and according to Reuters, no ECB president has been picked without a nod from Paris.
The right-wing National Rally has been ascendant in the polls recently, while Macron has failed to offer stable governance, with seven different prime ministers serving under his tenure. National Rally president Jordan Bardella claims that, in choosing a new ECB president, Macron would be able to exercise influence beyond the end of his official term.
According to the Financial Times, the current frontrunners to replace Lagarde are former Spanish central bank governor Pablo Hernández de Cos and former Dutch central bank governor Klaas Knot.
In 2022, Hernández de Cos said at a Bank of International Settlements (BIS) conference that crypto can “pose highly significant risks that are hard to understand and measure, even for the most experienced agents.”
He called for a robust regulatory framework to transition crypto from “that hyperbolic ‘Wild West’ myth to a more desirable orderly ‘railroad of civilisation.’”
Knot has been similarly cautious. Speaking before the BIS in 2024, he acknowledged the possible benefits of certain aspects of blockchain technology.
Related: How euro stablecoins could address EU’s dollar concerns
“Creating a digital representation of an asset and placing it on a distributed ledger could bring benefits to the financial system. This includes efficiency gains and potentially increased liquidity of certain assets. Of course, there may also be risks for financial stability.”
Still, he stressed the regulators were assessing the implications these technologies would have on broader financial stability, stating that, “We cannot presume that this innovation, and potentially more decentralization, will bring significant benefits to the global financial system.”
In June 2025, he addressed stablecoins specifically. Knot said that whether the next form of money comes via stablecoins or already established payment networks “should be something we are agnostic on.”
While neutral on the manner of technology supporting financial innovation, he said that “fostering innovation must not come at the expense of stability.”
While often criticized for the glacial pace of progress, the EU managed to pass a comprehensive crypto framework earlier than the far more crypto-friendly United States. This framework included guidance and input from a crypto-cautious central bank, with a skeptic at the helm.
Magazine: Bitcoin may take 7 years to upgrade to post-quantum: BIP-360 co-author
Cointelegraph Features and Cointelegraph Magazine publish long-form journalism, analysis and narrative reporting produced by Cointelegraph’s in-house editorial team and selected external contributors with subject-matter expertise. All articles are edited and reviewed by Cointelegraph editors in line with our editorial standards. Contributions from external writers are commissioned for their experience, research or perspective and do not reflect the views of Cointelegraph as a company unless explicitly stated. Content published in Features and Magazine does not constitute financial, legal or investment advice. Readers should conduct their own research and consult qualified professionals where appropriate. Cointelegraph maintains full editorial independence. The selection, commissioning and publication of Features and Magazine content are not influenced by advertisers, partners or commercial relationships.
The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has paved the way for Wall Street to integrate stablecoins into traditional finance.
On February 19, the financial regulator issued guidance allowing broker-dealers to apply a 2% “haircut” to positions in payment stablecoins. A haircut is the percentage of an asset’s value that a financial institution cannot count toward its deployable capital, acting as a customer-protection buffer against market risk.
SEC Stablecoin Pivot Pressures Brokers to Build Crypto Rails
Previously, broker-dealers faced a punitive 100% haircut on stablecoins. If a financial firm held $1 million in digital dollars to facilitate rapid on-chain settlement, it had to lock up that capital.
That requirement effectively made institutional crypto trading economically radioactive for traditional financial institutions.
By dropping the capital penalty to 2%, the SEC has granted compliant stablecoins the same economic treatment as traditional money market funds.
“This is another terrific step in the right direction from our team in the Division of Trading and Markets to remove barriers and unlock access to on-chain markets,” SEC Chair Paul Atkins said.
Interestingly, this pivot is heavily anchored in the newly passed GENIUS Act. This is a federal regulatory framework for payment stablecoins in the US. It mandates 1:1 reserve backing and strengthens anti-money laundering (AML) compliance.
SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce noted that the new legislation forces stringent reserve requirements for stablecoin issuers.
According to her, these requirements are even stricter than those applied to government money market funds, which justify the reduced capital penalty.
“Stablecoins are essential to transacting on blockchain rails. Using stablecoins will make it feasible for broker-dealers to engage in a broader range of business activities relating to tokenized securities and other crypto assets,” Peirce added.
In light of this, US-regulated entities such as Circle’s USDC could see substantial adoption from firms in the $6 trillion sector.
As a result, industry executives were quick to celebrate the digital asset industry’s shifting fortunes.
Exodus CEO JP Richardson called it the most important crypto win of the year. He argued it makes tokenized treasuries, equities, and on-chain settlement “economically viable overnight.”
“This puts pressure on every major broker-dealer to build stablecoin infrastructure or fall behind the ones who do. Because their competitors now can and there’s no longer a capital penalty that makes it uneconomical,” he explained.
Meanwhile, this approval continues the current SEC’s slew of pro-crypto regulations.
Over the past year, the SEC has launched a digital asset task force and initiated “Project Crypto” to modernize its rules. These efforts are designed to make the US the crypto capital of the world.
Crypto World
RWA Goes Mainstream: BlackRock and Apollo Plug Billions Into Uniswap and Morpho Protocols
TLDR:
- RWA integration reaches a new level as BlackRock’s $2.4B BUIDL fund goes live on UniswapX for 24/7 trading
- Apollo Global Management is authorized to acquire up to 90M MORPHO tokens over 48 months.
- MORPHO token surged 17.8% after Apollo’s formal cooperation agreement was publicly announced.
- Wall Street’s governance token purchases signal a major shift in institutional DeFi confidence.
RWA momentum reached a new milestone this week as BlackRock and Apollo Global Management moved beyond pilot programs into deep infrastructure integration.
BlackRock connected its tokenized fund to Uniswap’s trading rails, while Apollo signed a formal agreement with Morpho’s lending protocol.
Together, these moves mark a structural shift in how traditional asset managers are engaging with decentralized finance. Wall Street is no longer testing the waters; it is now actively building within them.
BlackRock Plugs BUIDL Into Uniswap’s Trading Infrastructure
BlackRock partnered with Securitize and Uniswap Labs to integrate its BUIDL fund into the UniswapX system. The fund currently holds approximately $2.4 billion in assets under management. Eligible institutional investors can now trade BUIDL against USDC around the clock, seven days a week.
Notably, the integration bypasses traditional AMM liquidity pools entirely. Instead, it uses UniswapX’s off-chain order routing system, which settles transactions on-chain.
Orders flow through a Request-for-Quote framework to whitelisted market makers, including Wintermute and Flowdesk, acting as solvers.
Sentora’s newsletter captured the weight of the moment, noting that “the era of testing is over,” and that Wall Street is now “actively utilizing decentralized protocols to trade and lend” tokenized assets.
Securitize handles compliance by pre-qualifying all participating wallets. This structure keeps institutional capital separate from non-KYC retail pools.
Beyond the technical setup, BlackRock also purchased an undisclosed amount of UNI governance tokens, marking its first direct financial engagement with a DeFi protocol’s governance structure.
Apollo Enters Decentralized Credit Through Morpho Agreement
Apollo Global Management, which oversees $940 billion in traditional assets, signed a formal cooperation agreement with Morpho.
The deal centers on building and scaling on-chain lending markets using Morpho’s infrastructure. Apollo and its affiliates are authorized to acquire up to 90 million MORPHO tokens over the next 48 months.
Sentora framed the broader trend clearly, stating that these institutions are “natively plugging tokenized assets into Uniswap’s liquidity rails and Morpho’s lending markets.”
The MORPHO token rallied 17.8% in the week following the announcement, according to CoinGecko data. Apollo’s acquisition strategy combines open-market purchases with over-the-counter transactions, with strict ownership caps and transfer restrictions built into the agreement.
Morpho’s architecture suits institutional needs because it allows permissionless market creation. Apollo can launch isolated lending pairs and custom vaults without waiting for a DAO governance vote.
This flexibility lets large managers set their own collateral ratios and interest rate parameters within a controlled environment.
Wall Street’s Growing Appetite for DeFi Governance Tokens
The RWA narrative is evolving beyond asset tokenization into active protocol ownership. Both BlackRock and Apollo are now acquiring governance tokens, a practice that traditional institutions previously avoided due to regulatory concerns.
As Sentora analyst Gabriel Halm put it, these firms view governance tokens as “essential infrastructure stakes, analogous to holding equity in a clearinghouse or a traditional exchange network.”
This shift also reflects a broader efficiency argument. Traditional markets carry T+1 or T+2 settlement delays and fragmented liquidity.
Halm noted that by “plugging tokenized Treasuries into decentralized routing and building structured credit on permissionless rails, institutions are actively upgrading their operational efficiency.”
These advantages are increasingly difficult for institutional managers to overlook as competition for yield tightens.
Meanwhile, the broader DeFi market shows mixed conditions. TVL and token supply remain flat, and leveraged ETH restaking strategies have moved into negative carry territory.
The debt-weighted average cost of borrowing ETH now sits at 3.40%, exceeding yields across all major liquid staking and restaking protocols tracked as of February 20, 2026.
Bitcoin market sentiment has cooled as speculative euphoria ebbs, according to a weekly assessment by Santiment. The analytics firm notes that calls for BTC to sprint into uncharted territory — with bold targets ranging from $150,000 to $200,000, or even a drop to $50,000–$100,000 — have faded from the discourse. The shift away from meme-driven optimism is framed as a healthier sign for the market, suggesting retail buyers are retreating from extreme projections. While price action has not produced a definitive trend, the combination of cooling FOMO and mixed on-chain signals points to a more cautious environment. Bitcoin previously surged to around $126,100 in October before sliding into a downtrend that persisted through year-end.
Key takeaways
- Calls for extraordinary BTC targets are fading, signaling a rebalanced risk appetite.
- Bitcoin traded near $60,000 on Feb. 6 and later rose toward the mid-$60s, reaching about $67,800 at the time of publication.
- Social sentiment around BTC has shifted from extreme bearishness to neutral, complicating short-term trading decisions.
- The Crypto Fear & Greed Index remained in Extreme Fear, underscoring persistent caution among investors.
- On-chain activity shows warning signs, with declining transaction volume, fewer active addresses, and slower network growth suggesting dormancy rather than expansion.
Tickers mentioned: $BTC
Sentiment: Neutral
Price impact: Positive. Bitcoin’s bounce back toward the mid-$60k range provides a modest near-term price lift after February’s dip.
Trading idea (Not Financial Advice): Hold. The combination of softened sentiment signals and dwindling on-chain activity argues for a cautious stance rather than aggressive positioning.
Market context: The mood around BTC sits at a crossroads between a cooler speculative outlook and a still-fragile risk-off backdrop. With daily trading volumes and on-chain participation cooling, the market appears to be testing whether the recent price appreciation can translate into sustainable user activity or whether it remains a symptom of speculative liquidity rather than fundamental growth.
Why it matters
The Santiment analysis captures a moment when the crypto narrative shifts from high-conviction price fantasies to a more grounded view of Bitcoin’s fundamentals and macro-driven price action. On one hand, prominent proponents previously predicting multi-hundred-thousand-dollar BTC prices have softened their stance, acknowledging the need for a longer, steadier runway. On the other hand, even as price nudges higher, traders face a paradox: sentiment has improved enough to reduce panic-driven moves, yet on-chain metrics tell a story of reduced network activity, which historically can precede meaningful price moves or retests of support levels.
Bitcoin’s price trajectory has been a central point of focus for market participants. After a push to the early 2025 high, BTC then retraced into late-year weakness, a pattern that left many investors cautious about the durability of any rebound. The February dip to around $60,000 was followed by a tentative recovery into the mid-$60k area, with the latest readings showing the asset hovering near $67,847 according to CoinMarketCap. This price action, set against fading meme-driven enthusiasm, underscores a market that may require clearer catalysts before committing to a fresh up-leg or a renewed consolidation phase.
From a sentiment perspective, the shift from “extreme bearishness” toward a neutral stance can both help and hinder decision-making. While neutral sentiment reflects a cooling of speculative frenzy, it can also reduce the clarity of trading signals, making it harder for participants to determine whether a breakout is genuine or simply a pause in the current range. Santiment cautions that relying solely on sentiment metrics in such environments can be misleading, urging traders to balance social indicators with real-time on-chain data and price action.
On-chain indicators add another layer of nuance. Transaction volume, active addresses, and network growth have all shown a tendency to trend downward, a sign that the network is being used less frequently. In practical terms, this dormancy can imply that a large portion of market participants are waiting on the sidelines, rather than actively expanding utilization or driving new demand for block space. While this is not inherently bearish, it does suggest that price momentum might rely more on liquidity and macro factors than on fundamental network-driven demand in the near term.
Meanwhile, the Crypto Fear & Greed Index has persisted in the Extreme Fear zone, a reminder that risk appetite remains fragile even as prices recover from mid-wFebruary lows. Such readings often reflect a market where traders are wary of mispricing or sudden reversals, preferring to observe and react rather than to chase momentum. The juxtaposition of a modest price uptick with cautionary social sentiment and waning on-chain activity paints a complex picture for investors weighing the odds of a sustained rally versus a prolonged consolidation or a deeper pullback.
Beyond BTC-specific dynamics, the broader market context remains relevant. A cooler sentiment regime can coincide with tighter liquidity and a more selective investment climate, impacting capitalization on new products, exchange-traded products, and institutional allocations. In this environment, investors may favor risk-managed strategies and deeper due diligence over rapid entry, even as favourable macro cues or favorable regulatory developments could tilt the balance toward a renewed upswing.
What to watch next
- Monitor on-chain metrics for signs of renewed active participation (transaction volume, number of active addresses, network growth) over the next few weeks.
- Track BTC price action around key levels near $68,000–$70,000 to identify potential breakouts or resistance tests.
- Watch sentiment indicators for any renewed swing toward bullishness or a return to fear-driven selling pressures.
- Observe any shifts in macro liquidity and risk sentiment that could provide a catalyst for a sustained move higher or a pullback.
Sources & verification
- Santiment: Weekly sentiment overview noting the decline in extreme price targets and the shift in retail optimism.
- CoinMarketCap: Bitcoin price data showing a dip near $60,000 in early February and a later level around $67,800 at publication time.
- Alternative.me: Crypto Fear & Greed Index reading at 8 (Extreme Fear).
- On-chain indicators referenced by Santiment: transaction volume, active addresses, and network growth trends.
- The broader discussion of BTC price dynamics and sentiment shifts summarized in Santiment’s weekly report.
Market reaction and key details
Bitcoin (CRYPTO: BTC) has navigated a climate where speculative frenzy has cooled, and investors are increasingly data-driven in their approach. Santiment’s latest weekly note highlights a notable retreat in calls for explosive BTC appreciation or drastic downside, signaling a more tempered market outlook. The shift away from outsized targets underscores a broader recalibration of risk as participants weigh the likelihood of a sustained rally against the possibility of choppy, range-bound trading.
The historical price arc serves as a reference point for the current mood. After peaking around $126,100 in October, BTC entered a downtrend that tempered expectations for a rapid, uninterrupted ascent. The subsequent months reinforced a picture of a market sensitive to macro headlines and liquidity cycles, rather than a purely driven by hyperbolic optimism. In early February, the asset found its footing around the $60,000 mark, only to recover modestly in the mid-$60,000s and hover near $67,800 at the time of writing. This sequence illustrates how price and sentiment can diverge in the short term, with cautious optimism coexisting with measured risk-taking.
On the sentiment front, the recovery from prior “extreme bearishness” suggests participants are beginning to consider price action in a more balanced light. Yet the absence of a clear, confirmatory trend means traders face a dilemma: whether to read the current neutral stance as a precursor to a durable rally or as a temporary pause before renewed volatility. Santiment emphasizes that sentiment metrics should not be the sole basis for decisions in such conditions; instead, they should be interpreted in the context of on-chain activity and price momentum to form a holistic view.
Despite the more constructive narrative around BTC, on-chain metrics offer a cautionary note. The indicators highlighted—transaction volume, active addresses, and network growth—are showing signs of deceleration. This pattern points to a market where a large share of participants is currently waiting on the sidelines, rather than actively expanding network usage or driving new adoption. While not inherently bearish, the data signals that any upside momentum may depend on a fresh round of sustained utility and user participation beyond mere price speculation.
Additionally, the Crypto Fear & Greed Index’s Extreme Fear reading reinforces the sense that risk tolerance remains constrained. In such an environment, even favorable price moves might be treated with scepticism by some investors who seek stronger proof of durable demand or clearer catalysts before committing additional capital. Taken together, the data landscape from Santiment — coupled with the price action and the on-chain signals — depicts a market undergoing a cautious recalibration rather than a wholesale paradigm shift toward new all-time highs.
TLDR:
- Robert Kiyosaki bought another full Bitcoin near $67K during recent market weakness.
- Bitcoin demand shifted above zero after months of persistent negative readings.
- Long-term holders are beginning to absorb new supply as selling pressure cools.
- The 21 million supply cap remains central to Bitcoin’s long-term scarcity narrative.
Bitcoin demand returned to positive territory as market participants reacted to fresh accumulation signals and renewed buying activity.
The shift comes as author Robert Kiyosaki disclosed another Bitcoin purchase during the recent price dip near $67,000.
At the same time, on-chain data shared by CryptosRus showed apparent demand moving above zero after months of weakness.
Together, these developments frame a market balancing short-term volatility against long-term supply constraints.
Robert Kiyosaki Adds to Holdings During Bitcoin Demand Shift
Robert Kiyosaki, author of Rich Dad Poor Dad, confirmed on X that he bought another full Bitcoin near $67,000. His statement came as Bitcoin traded around $68,000 during a period of price consolidation.
The purchase aligns with his repeated strategy of accumulating during downturns rather than selling into weakness.
In his tweet, Kiyosaki cited concerns about rising United States debt and potential large-scale dollar issuance. He argued that extensive monetary expansion would weaken the dollar and reinforce Bitcoin’s scarcity narrative. His comments referred to what he described as a coming “Big Print” by the Federal Reserve.
Kiyosaki also pointed to Bitcoin’s capped supply of 21 million coins. He stated that once the final Bitcoin is mined, the asset would stand stronger than gold. The supply ceiling remains central to discussions among long-term holders about Bitcoin demand.
Although Bitcoin has faced short-term price swings, Kiyosaki framed the decline as an opportunity. His approach reflects a broader accumulation thesis focused on fixed supply rather than daily volatility. The purchase adds to the ongoing debate over Bitcoin’s role as a hedge against currency expansion.
On-Chain Data Shows Bitcoin Demand Turning Positive
Separately, CryptosRus reported that Bitcoin demand has flipped positive after nearly three months of contraction.
Apparent demand moved to approximately +1,200 BTC following a prolonged negative stretch. In December, the metric had dropped to near -154,000 BTC, reflecting persistent distribution.
The data measures whether long-term holders are absorbing newly mined supply. When the reading remains deeply negative, excess supply typically weighs on price action. As the metric turns positive, selling pressure appears to ease.
According to the shared analysis, structural accumulation is beginning to re-emerge. Selling activity has cooled compared to previous months, supporting the recovery in Bitcoin demand.
However, market observers noted that a single positive print does not confirm a sustained trend.
Even so, historical patterns show that positive demand readings often precede stronger market phases. If the recovery persists, accumulation may gradually rebuild the foundation for price stability. For now, Bitcoin demand remains the central metric guiding near-term sentiment.
Is ETH finally going to rebound decisively, or will there be another crash to new lows.
Ethereum continues to struggle to reclaim the coveted $2,000 psychological level, as each attempt to do so results in a subsequent rejection and correction.
Popular analyst Ali Martinez weighed in on the asset’s recent performance and explained that it’s forming a bullish flag. However, there’s a major catch in his post, which could actually mean trouble ahead for ETH.
Ethereum $ETH is forming a bullish flag!
There’s just one twist… The chart is inverted. pic.twitter.com/Kb8eamJOMF
— Ali Charts (@alicharts) February 20, 2026
The “inverted” bullish flag shows that ETH has actually been in a consistent downtrend for weeks, but it has managed to compress within a tighter range more recently. Martinez believes a bigger move is in the making, but it could push the asset to new local lows of under $1,400.
Daan Crypto Trades also brought up ETH’s underwhelming performance as of late, indicating that the start of 2026 has been worse than how it moved in early 2025.
The analyst outlined hopes that the largest altcoin could finally rebound in the following few months, since the March-to-May period is historically more beneficial for it.
$ETH Has started the year of worse than last year so far. Historically, March through May are good months for ETH.
But we know how the market is all over the place recently and that there’s been pretty much zero correlation with other risk assets.
This makes for an awful… pic.twitter.com/CBAfLTduHx
— Daan Crypto Trades (@DaanCrypto) February 21, 2026
You may also like:
Another unfavorable development within the Ethereum investor ecosystem is the net flows within the spot ETH ETFs. Last week was in the red once again, with roughly $113 million leaving the funds.
On the opposite side, BitMine continues to accumulate. The Tom Lee-chaired company bought another 45,759 ETH last week, and now holds 4,371,497 tokens, valued at almost $8.7 billion. The company is down $8 billion on its Ethereum position, given its average entry cost of $3,820.
SECRET PARTNERSHIP BONUS for CryptoPotato readers: Use this link to register and unlock $1,500 in exclusive BingX Exchange rewards (limited time offer).
Disclosure: The views and opinions expressed here belong solely to the author and do not represent the views and opinions of crypto.news’ editorial.
I’ve watched enough liquidation cascades to know that prices move faster than narratives, timelines fill with confident takes, and even experienced traders start reacting to the loudest signal in the room. In those minutes, the core challenge is maintaining a coherent decision process when the environment tries to break it.
Summary
- Volatility exposes attention limits: When markets cascade, traders don’t just need predictions — they need compressed context. AI becomes the “second screen” that restores coherence under stress.
- Usage spikes during chaos, not calm: Data shows AI engagement surges around liquidation events, revealing that traders use it to filter noise and slow emotional reactions.
- Interpretation shapes market structure: As more traders rely on AI for real-time context, the quality of those interpretations can either dampen herding or amplify systemic risk.
That’s why the most meaningful shift I’m seeing is practical. Traders reach for AI during chaos because it compresses information, restores context, and slows emotional reaction time when the market speeds up. Engagement rises broadly over time, and then surges when markets stress-test attention. AI increasingly sits inside the crypto market structure, so those surges carry implications beyond product adoption.
When the screen turns red, attention becomes the bottleneck
During extreme volatility, traders struggle with context collapse. Price action, breaking news, on-chain chatter, funding changes, liquidation data, and social sentiment hit at once. The mental bandwidth required to interpret it all becomes the constraint.
A growing body of research links information overload to degraded decision accuracy under limited attention. A Federal Reserve paper lays out that mechanism and the measurable market effects.
In that environment, many traders gravitate toward tools that turn the flood into something legible. The demand shifts toward fast summaries, context comparisons, and clearer explanations of what has changed.
What tool usage time reveals about trader intent
Since August 2025, MEXC reports that 2.35 million users have used its AI trading suite, generating 10.8 million total interactions. Average daily active users reached about 93,000, with a single-day peak near 157,000; the conversational bot represented the largest share of activity in the suite.
Those totals matter, but the shape of usage matters more. Spikes cluster around stress events, when traders seek a compressed understanding quickly.
When the market accelerates, traders increase their use of AI as a lens for interpretation. That pattern also clarifies what traders mean when they say “AI helps me trade.” In volatile conditions, “help” often means filtering noise, summarizing the moving parts, and restoring situational awareness. The decision remains theirs, and the tool shapes what they can see in time.
AI as stress infrastructure for clarity and restraint
A lot of AI conversation in trading still centers on prediction. In lived market conditions, traders often value something else: coherence.
During volatility, a trader’s biggest risk is often cognitive. Stress narrows attention. Social proof grows louder. Rumor fills the gaps left by speed. Tools that provide fast context can lower the odds of impulsive action driven by panic and narrative momentum.
AI’s real utility shows up at the trader level. It can behave like an editor, distilling what’s known and flagging what’s uncertain — or helping the user anchor on relevant variables while the market tries to drag them into reaction.
That distinction matters because it draws a line between support and substitution. Support tools improve comprehension under stress. Substitution tools encourage delegation of judgment when uncertainty is highest.
Why this matters for market structure
Now zoom out. AI affects markets beyond retail-facing tools. AI adoption in capital markets spans trading and market intermediation, and carries risks tied to opacity, governance challenges, and correlated behavior when many systems respond similarly.
AI-driven trading can contribute to faster markets and higher volatility during stress, especially when strategies converge or react in similar ways to shocks. Crypto magnifies these dynamics. The market runs 24/7. Reflexive sentiment moves quickly. Professional market makers and retail traders often share the same venues and the same velocity of information. In that setting, exchange design and information presentation become part of how markets behave under pressure.
This is why I believe exchanges are increasingly evaluated on a broader definition of quality. Liquidity and fees remain essential, but users also judge the platform’s capacity to keep them oriented when volatility peaks. At scale, orientation becomes stability.
When large numbers of traders use AI tools during volatility to interpret the market in real time, the quality of those interpretations shapes behavior. A clearer context reduces crowding into the same rumors and overreactions. Poor context can accelerate herding, especially when uncertainty is highest.
The next phase of AI in crypto markets is accountability and provenance
If traders use AI primarily for interpretation during stress, the next phase is about accountability. Accountability starts with making it obvious what sources an insight relies on, what is confirmed versus inferred, and what the tool cannot responsibly conclude in real time. Analysts explicitly frame market-wide risks that can emerge from broad AI adoption, especially around correlated behavior and stress dynamics.
It also changes how AI-powered features should be framed. Tools that present themselves as authoritative forecasts can encourage over-delegation at the exact moment when humility and restraint matter most. Tools that emphasize context can encourage deliberation without pretending to eliminate uncertainty.
As AI spreads through trading and market infrastructure, monitoring and governance need to keep pace because systemic risks reveal themselves most sharply during stress.
AI is becoming the translation layer for speed
The industry often talks about AI as a trader. Many users already treat it as a translator. When markets break, traders lean on AI to convert noise into signal, speed into digestible context, and emotional pressure into something closer to restraint. That’s why adoption rises during volatility, and that’s why the stakes are bigger than feature engagement charts suggest.
With more participants relying on similar kinds of real-time interpretation under stress, AI shapes how the crowd understands events. At that point, AI influences behavior at scale, and behavior at scale becomes market structure.
Disclosure: This article does not represent investment advice. The content and materials featured on this page are for educational purposes only.
TLDR:
- Bitcoin’s cycle bottoms have grown shallower each time, falling from -92.7% in 2011 to -68.5% in 2022.
- BTC is currently 47% below its October 2025 ATH of $126K, with Fear and Greed at single digits.
- Green drawdown days near all-time highs are growing faster than red days for the first time in Bitcoin’s history.
- Comparing the 2025 selloff to 2018 may be the wrong framework, as structural data points to a maturing asset.
The latest Bitcoin selloff has renewed fears of a prolonged bear market, but historical drawdown data suggests this cycle may not follow the same path as those before it.
Bitcoin currently trades roughly 47% below its October 2025 all-time high of $126,000. Fear and Greed readings sit at single digits.
Yet 15 years of drawdown data, when mapped against the present, paints a different picture from what many traders are expecting.
Past Cycles Carried Far Deeper and Longer Drawdowns
In 2011, Bitcoin collapsed 92.7% from its peak. Nearly every day of its young existence was spent deep in drawdown territory.
The 2013–2015 cycle followed with a 72% decline, adding over 1,500 days of brutal losses to the historical record.
By 2017, Bitcoin had logged more than 2,500 drawdown days, and red still dominated the distribution chart. The 2018 bear market then pushed losses to 78.4%, reinforcing the same deep correction band between -60% and -80%. Those cycles defined what analyst Sminston With described as “the old Bitcoin.”
The critical pattern across all those cycles, however, is one of gradual improvement. Each successive bottom came in shallower than the one before it.
The sequence runs as follows: -92.7%, -87%, -84%, -77%, and then -68.5% in 2022. That consistent upward shift in the floor is not coincidental.
The current selloff, sitting at approximately -47%, has not yet approached any of those prior cycle bottoms. That alone separates this moment from what traders experienced in 2018 or 2015, even if sentiment feels comparable.
Structural Shifts in How Bitcoin Spends Its Time
After the 2021 bull cycle, a measurable change appeared in the drawdown distribution. Green bars, representing days spent within 0% to -15% of an all-time high, began growing at a faster rate than any prior period. Bitcoin was simply spending more time near its highs than it ever had before.
Sminston With noted that “green-white oscillations are replacing the deep red plunges,” referring to the shift away from the severe, prolonged corrections that once dominated Bitcoin’s history.
The transition zone between -15% and -35% has also grown, with Bitcoin spending close to 90 days there following the October 2025 peak.
This does not mean further downside is impossible. Some market participants are still calling for $40,000 or even $25,000.
However, the data shows that Bitcoin’s worst drawdowns have been getting structurally shallower, cycle after cycle, and the time spent near all-time highs has been growing.
The question the data raises is straightforward. If each cycle bottom has come in less severe than the last, and if Bitcoin is spending more time in the green regime than ever before, then comparing 2025 to 2018 may simply be the wrong framework for this moment.
IoTeX Investigates Token Safe Incident as Analysts Estimate $4.3M Loss
Ryan Garcia vs Mario Barrios: UK start time, undercard and how to watch fight tonight
Two new Apple Studio Displays could gatecrash March MacBook announcements
-
Video5 days agoBitcoin: We’re Entering The Most Dangerous Phase
-
Tech6 days agoLuxman Enters Its Second Century with the D-100 SACD Player and L-100 Integrated Amplifier
-
Crypto World4 days agoCan XRP Price Successfully Register a 33% Breakout Past $2?
-
Sports4 days agoGB's semi-final hopes hang by thread after loss to Switzerland
-
Fashion18 hours agoWeekend Open Thread: Boden – Corporette.com
-
Video1 day agoXRP News: XRP Just Entered a New Phase (Almost Nobody Noticed)
-
Tech4 days agoThe Music Industry Enters Its Less-Is-More Era
-
Business4 days agoInfosys Limited (INFY) Discusses Tech Transitions and the Unique Aspects of the AI Era Transcript
-
Entertainment3 days agoKunal Nayyar’s Secret Acts Of Kindness Sparks Online Discussion
-
Video4 days agoFinancial Statement Analysis | Complete Chapter Revision in 10 Minutes | Class 12 Board exam 2026
-
Tech3 days agoRetro Rover: LT6502 Laptop Packs 8-Bit Power On The Go
-
Sports2 days agoClearing the boundary, crossing into history: J&K end 67-year wait, enter maiden Ranji Trophy final | Cricket News
-
Entertainment3 days agoDolores Catania Blasts Rob Rausch For Turning On ‘Housewives’ On ‘Traitors’
-
Business3 days agoTesla avoids California suspension after ending ‘autopilot’ marketing
-
NewsBeat6 days agoThe strange Cambridgeshire cemetery that forbade church rectors from entering
-
Politics4 days agoEurovision Announces UK Act For 2026 Song Contest
-
Crypto World3 days agoWLFI Crypto Surges Toward $0.12 as Whale Buys $2.75M Before Trump-Linked Forum
-
NewsBeat6 days agoMan dies after entering floodwater during police pursuit
-
Crypto World2 days ago83% of Altcoins Enter Bear Trend as Liquidity Crunch Tightens Grip on Crypto Market
-
NewsBeat7 days agoUK construction company enters administration, records show