Connect with us

Crypto World

Binance and Changpeng Zhao Win Dismissal of $4.3B Terrorism Financing Civil Lawsuit

Published

on

Nexo Partners with Bakkt for US Crypto Exchange and Yield Programs

TLDR:

  • Binance and founder Changpeng Zhao had all civil terrorism financing claims dismissed by a Manhattan federal judge.
  • The 535 plaintiffs failed to prove Binance culpably linked itself to 64 terrorist attacks from 2017 to 2024.
  • Judge Vargas ruled the 891-page complaint was excessive but allowed plaintiffs to file an amended version.
  • Zhao accused plaintiffs of piggybacking on Binance’s 2023 guilty plea and its $4.32 billion criminal penalty.

Binance and its founder Changpeng Zhao have secured the dismissal of a major civil lawsuit. A federal judge in Manhattan ruled in their favor on Friday, March 7.

The case involved 535 plaintiffs, including victims and their relatives, tied to 64 terrorist attacks. The plaintiffs sought to hold Binance and Zhao financially liable for alleged cryptocurrency transfers to terrorist groups.

The attacks reportedly took place between 2017 and 2024 across several parts of the world.

Court Finds No Culpable Link Between Binance, Zhao, and Terrorist Organizations

U.S. District Judge Jeannette Vargas presided over the case in Manhattan’s federal court. She found that the plaintiffs did not sufficiently allege that Binance or Zhao participated in the attacks.

Advertisement

The judge ruled that neither defendant “culpably associated themselves with these terrorist attacks, participated in them as something they wanted to bring about, or sought by their actions to ensure their success.” Their only connection to the groups was through standard, arm’s-length transactions on the exchange.

The plaintiffs attributed the attacks to several designated foreign terrorist organizations. These included Hamas, Hezbollah, Iran’s Revolutionary Guard Corps, and Islamic State.

Palestinian Islamic Jihad, Kataib Hezbollah, and al Qaeda were also named in the complaint. Plaintiffs alleged that hundreds of millions in cryptocurrency flowed through Binance to these groups.

They also alleged billions in transactions with Iranian users were used to benefit attack proxies. Judge Vargas acknowledged Binance and Zhao may have had general awareness of financing risks.

Advertisement

However, she noted that their only tie to the organizations was that “they, or their affiliates, had accounts on, and have transacted on, the Binance exchange in an arms’ length relationship.” Awareness alone was not enough to establish legal liability under the law.

The judge further noted the complaint’s excessive length in her ruling. The 891-page, 3,189-paragraph filing was called “wholly unnecessary” despite its “weighty” allegations. Plaintiffs were given the option to file an amended complaint going forward.

Binance’s $4.3 Billion Criminal Penalty and Its Tie to the Dismissed Case

Zhao argued in court filings that plaintiffs sought to exploit Binance’s prior criminal proceedings. In November 2023, Binance pleaded guilty to violating federal anti-money-laundering and sanctions laws.

The exchange paid a $4.32 billion criminal penalty as part of that resolution. Zhao contended the plaintiffs tried to “piggyback” on that case to pursue triple damages under the Anti-Terrorism Act.

Advertisement

The court rejected that approach and dismissed all claims against the defendants. Both Binance and Zhao had condemned terrorism throughout their court filings. Their papers made clear that neither party sought to support or facilitate any terrorist activity.

Following the ruling, a Binance spokesperson issued a statement: “Binance was pleased to see that the court in this case correctly dismissed these baseless allegations. Binance takes compliance seriously and has no tolerance for bad actors on its platform.” The exchange also referenced a letter sent to Senator Blumenthal on the same day.

Neither Zhao’s legal team nor the plaintiffs’ lawyers were immediately available for comment. Plaintiffs retain the right to file an amended complaint following the dismissal. No timeline for a potential refiling has been publicly announced as of Friday.

 

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Crypto World

South Korea Bars Stablecoins from Corporate Crypto Investment Guidelines Over Legal Conflict

Published

on

Nexo Partners with Bakkt for US Crypto Exchange and Yield Programs

TLDR:

  • South Korea FSC excludes USDT and USDC from corporate crypto investment guidelines over legal conflicts.
  • The Foreign Exchange Transactions Act does not recognize stablecoins as a valid external payment method.
  • Listed companies may invest in the top 20 non-stablecoin assets, capped at 5% of their own capital.
  • A pending amendment to the Foreign Exchange Act could eventually open the door for stablecoin inclusion.

Stablecoins, including USDT and USDC, are set to be excluded from South Korea’s corporate cryptocurrency investment guidelines.

South Korea’s Financial Services Commission (FSC) is preparing rules to allow listed companies to trade digital assets.

According to Herald Economy, regulators have opted to keep dollar-pegged stablecoins out of the approved investment list.

The decision stems from a conflict with the Foreign Exchange Transactions Act. This law does not currently recognize stablecoins as a legal external payment method.

Legal Conflict Shapes the Stablecoin Decision

South Korea’s Foreign Exchange Transactions Act requires external payments to go through designated foreign exchange banks. Stablecoins are not classified as external payment instruments under this law.

Advertisement

Allowing corporate investment in stablecoins would create a direct legal contradiction. The FSC chose to exclude stablecoins from the new corporate investment guidelines.

A partial amendment to the Foreign Exchange Transactions Act was introduced to the National Assembly in October. The amendment aims to formally recognize stablecoins as a means of payment.

The bill, however, remains under review and has not yet been passed. Until the law changes, stablecoins cannot be included in corporate investment guidelines.

Advertisement

Instead, the FSC plans to permit the top 20 non-stablecoin digital assets by market capitalization. Bitcoin and Ethereum are among the assets expected to be approved under these rules.

Investment amounts may also be capped at 5% of a company’s own capital. This limit is designed to reduce exposure during the early market stages.

Some listed companies with cross-border trade had requested stablecoin inclusion in the guidelines. They argued stablecoins support exchange rate hedging and fast international settlements.

The FSC, however, maintained its position and excluded stablecoins from the permitted investment list.

Advertisement

Corporate Stablecoin Access Remains Outside Regulated Guidelines

Even without official guidelines covering stablecoins, companies can still trade them through other channels. Personal wallets like MetaMask and overseas exchanges such as Coinbase’s OTC platform remain accessible to corporations.

These transactions, however, operate outside any officially regulated framework. The guidelines do not block companies from using stablecoins entirely.

Authorities noted that some companies already use stablecoins through personal accounts or overseas exchange platforms for trade.

These transactions occur outside formal banking channels. The FSC acknowledged this but still chose not to formalize stablecoin use in the guidelines. Regulators placed legal consistency above industry convenience in this case.

Advertisement

An industry insider confirmed the corporate guidelines task force has wrapped up its work. “I know that the working task force on corporate guidelines has been completed,” the insider said.

They added, “It is in line with the legislative status of the Phase 2 Digital Asset Framework Act, so we have to wait and see, but it is a knotted situation.” Progress, therefore, depends heavily on how the broader legal framework develops.

The FSC’s approach signals a cautious entry into corporate digital asset participation. By limiting access to top non-stablecoin assets, regulators aim to manage financial risk.

Companies seeking stablecoin access will likely need to wait for the Foreign Exchange Transactions Act to be amended.

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Stablecoin Transaction Volume Hits a New Record High as USDC Surpasses USDT

Published

on

Stablecoin Transaction Volume Hits a New Record High as USDC Surpasses USDT

Stablecoins have hit an all-time high in monthly transaction volume, as Circle’s USDC (USDC) flipped Tether’s USDt (USDT), new data shows.

Key takeaways:

  • Stablecoin monthly transaction volume reached a record $1.8 trillion in February.

  • USDC comprised 70% of all stablecoin volume.

  • Rising stablecoin supply on exchanges puts crypto markets in a good position to recover.

USDC “consistently” flips USDt transfer volume

The stablecoin transfer volume reached $1.8 trillion in February, setting a monthly record, according to data from Allium.

Stablecoins are cryptocurrencies designed to maintain a stable value, typically pegged to fiat currencies like the US dollar, and can be hosted on multiple blockchains.

Advertisement
Stablecoin transaction volume ($). Source: Allium

Similarly, the volume of USDC transactions reached a high of $1.26 trillion, representing a new milestone in the adoption of the second-largest stablecoin by market cap since its launch in September 2018. 

Related: Florida Senate passes state-level stablecoin bill, awaits DeSantis’ signature

This was more than double that of USDt, whose transfer volume was $514 billion in February.

Transaction volume by stablecoin. Source: Allium

In fact, USDC has “consistently flipped” Tether in transfer volume over the last few months, founder at Moonrock Capital, Simon Dedic, said in a Friday post on X. 

USDC’s usage comes as a “surprise” given that its market cap is less than half that of USDt, Dedic added. USDC is the second-largest stablecoin by market cap at $77.4 billion, compared to USDt’s $184 billion.

Moreover, USDC’s supply has grown faster than USDt’s in recent weeks. Over $3 billion in USDC has been printed already in March, according to market intelligence firm Arkham, as USDt’s supply has remained relatively unchanged.

Advertisement

As Cointelegraph reported, USDC issuer Circle Internet Group reported strong Q4/2025 earnings, attributed to rapid growth in the USDC’s business and expanding payments operations.

Advertisement

More stablecoin liquidity suggests “buying power”

The Stablecoin Supply Ratio (SSR), or the ratio of the Bitcoin (BTC) market cap relative to stablecoin market cap, is “steadily recovering after crashing” in February, said CryptoQuant analyst Sunny Mom in a Friday Quicktake post, adding:

“This shows buying power is returning to the market.”

Bitcoin: Stablecoin Supply Ratio: Source: CryptoQuant

Meanwhile, Bitcoin’s latest push to $74,000 was fueled by a recovery in stablecoin supply on crypto exchanges, which rose to a three-week high of $66.5 billion on Friday. 

Stablecoin supply on exchanges. Source: CryptoQuant

Stablecoin inflows to exchanges have boosted the SSR alongside Bitcoin’s (BTC) price. On March 5, the total amount of stablecoins transferred to the exchange amounted to nearly $5.14 billion, up from $1.14 billion on March 1.

More stablecoins on exchanges means more buying power for cryptocurrencies. In the past, the return of sidelined capital to exchanges was a major catalyst for the start of Bitcoin bull markets.