Connect with us

Crypto World

Bitcoin Poised for Next Leg Down as $73K Precedes Death Cross

Published

on

Crypto Breaking News

Bitcoin is navigating a delicate chart landscape as traders weigh the risk of a protracted bear cycle against the possibility of a renewed bounce. After a March rally, market watchers say a sustained move higher will require a meaningful bullish catalyst to overcome persistent resistance and the weight of the larger trend. The asset touched monthly highs near $73,000 as geopolitical tensions underscored a broader risk-off tone, yet the path forward remains uncertain amid technical signals that historically precede retracements in bear markets.

Key takeaways

  • A weekly death cross—where shorter-term momentum crosses below longer-term moving averages—remains on track to confirm further downside unless a major bullish catalyst materializes.
  • Key overhead resistance sits in the mid-$70,000s, with psychological resistance around $75,000 and technical resistance near the 50-day simple moving average around $76,350.
  • Nearby levels include the 21-day SMA near $67,550, while the 21-week and 100-day SMAs sit near $88,000 and $87,300 respectively, defining longer-range tension points.
  • Longer-term expectations for the bear market point to a bottom at or below $50,000, though timing remains contested and depends on external catalysts and market momentum.
  • Market sentiment remains sensitive to macro factors and regional developments, translating into continued volatility even as the market tries to establish a clearer directional bias.

Tickers mentioned: $BTC

Sentiment: Bearish

Market context: The current setup mirrors a broader regime where liquidity and risk appetite are closely tied to macro cues and geopolitical risk. While occasional rallies spark talk of a new cycle, technicians emphasize that a durable shift requires sustained demand above key moving-average thresholds and a clean weekly close that confirms a change in trend rather than a temporary squeeze.

Why it matters

The looming death cross, a classic sign of potential downside in traditional market analysis, has traders watching the weekly chart for a potential inflection. If the cross confirms, it could signify a shift in momentum away from the recent bounce and toward a renewed leg lower. In that scenario, buyers would need to muster not just price strength but also conviction across timeframes to reassert control before the market slips further.

Advertisement

Beyond the technical read, the narrative around BTC remains tethered to external catalysts. The market has shown that headlines and macro developments can inject volatility even when chart patterns appear instructive. In the current environment, a decisive move higher would likely require a confluence of fundamental catalysts—such as positive developments in adoption, clearer regulatory signaling, or a surge in institutional demand—that can sustain a breakout beyond the mid-$70,000s. Until such catalysts emerge, the chart suggests that a period of consolidation or another test of support could define the near term.

Historically, the death cross has coincided with periods of drawdown or volatility, but it is not a guaranteed predictor of direction. Traders, therefore, emphasize risk management, looking for confirmation across multiple signals rather than relying on a single technical event. In this light, the market’s resilience around support zones—should price dip again—will be a critical test of whether buyers are accumulating for a more durable reversal or simply attempting to stall a broader decline.

What to watch next

  • Next weekly close: Watch whether BTC sustains levels above or around the 21-week/100-week moving averages to assess the strength of the longer-term trend.
  • Immediate resistance around $75,000 and the 50-day SMA near $76,350: A convincing breakout above these marks would be needed to alter the short-term narrative.
  • Support tests: A pullback toward or below the 21-day SMA around $67,550 could indicate whether bulls are building a base for a larger move or if sellers regain control.
  • Timescape & key technical levels: Monitor the interaction with notable levels, such as the Timescape Level around $71,300, for potential reversals or accelerations in price action.
  • External catalysts: Keep an eye on macro developments, regulatory signals, or significant on-chain activity that could alter risk sentiment and liquidity in the market.

Sources & verification

  • Keith Alan, cofounder of Material Indicators, X update noting continued price weakness beyond lower timeframes and highlighting key level references.
  • TradingView price data for BTCUSD, including the 21-day SMA and other moving-average levels used to anchor near-term analysis.
  • Cointelegraph coverage referencing the potential bottom around $50,000 and the looming weekly death cross as part of the longer-term bear-market narrative.
  • Historical context around the 21-week and 100-week SMAs and their role in shaping crossovers and potential trend shifts.

Rewritten Article Body

Bitcoin at a crossroads as weekly death cross looms and bears watch carefully

Bitcoin (CRYPTO: BTC) is negotiating a pivotal juncture as traders weigh whether a renewed leg lower is on the horizon or whether a bullish catalyst could reverse the current momentum. The asset flirted with monthly highs in the low-to-mid $70,000s, a level that has repeatedly tested bulls’ resolve in a market that remains sensitive to macro risk appetite and geopolitical headlines. The interplay of short-term momentum and long-term trend signals has created a scenario where a single daily candle could tilt expectations toward either sustained consolidation or a renewed surge—provided buyers muster the necessary conviction and volume to invalidate the bears’ case.

On the technical front, the market is watching for confirmation of a death cross that could signal a deterioration in momentum on a broader horizon. The setup involves the convergence of shorter- and longer-term averages in a way that historically precedes renewed downside pressure when not offset by a corresponding bullish catalyst. Traders point to the looming cross between the 21-week and 100-week SMAs as a potential precursor to the next leg down, a pattern that would reinforce a cautious stance unless buyers reassert themselves with a fundamental driver or a sustained breakout.

From a price-action standpoint, BTC has encountered a dense wall of resistance around the mid-$70,000s. The round-number psychology of $75,000 adds a psychological layer to the technical challenge, while the 50-day SMA near $76,350 introduces a second hurdle for a near-term breakout. The chart literature suggests that even if a bounce materializes, the market would need to secure a clear break above these milestones to shift the bias decisively away from a risk-off stance that has dominated sentiment in recent weeks.

Advertisement

Analysts emphasized the importance of the immediate price structure and the reaction to key levels. For instance, discussions around the 21-day SMA—roughly around $67,550—highlight the possibility of a test of near-term support if selling pressure intensifies. Such a test would be more than a routine retest; it could reveal whether the market is accumulating for a larger move or capitulating to a renewed wave of selling pressure. The balance between support and resistance in this zone is a microcosm of the broader struggle between buyers seeking a durable bottom and sellers pressing for lower prices in anticipation of more favorable entry points.

The broader market context cannot be ignored. Periods of heightened geopolitical tension, coupled with macro uncertainty, tend to compress liquidity and amplify price swings across crypto markets. In such environments, even patterns that are traditionally considered indicators of trend shifts must be interpreted against the backdrop of trader risk appetite and the availability of funds for leverage and financing. The presence of a potential death cross adds a layer of caution, but it does not by itself determine inevitability. A sustained positive catalyst—from institutional interest to regulatory clarity or meaningful adoption signals—could still catalyze a repricing that defies the immediate chart signal.

Within this framework, market participants are watching for a sequence of confirmations rather than relying on a single data point. The price level around $71,300, often cited in Timescape-era analyses, serves as a marker for whether the market is merely consolidating or preparing for a genuine breakout. The path forward may hinge on whether bulls can absorb selling pressure and maintain bid support at critical moving averages, allowing price to advance toward the next set of technical obstacles and perhaps establish a new foothold above the $75,000 threshold.

Beyond the charts, the narrative around Bitcoin remains influenced by external catalysts that can abruptly shift risk sentiment. Notably, the market’s sensitivity to developments in the broader financial ecosystem—ranging from regulatory signals to shifts in macro liquidity—means that even a technically fragile scenario can flip if a transformative event unfolds. In such moments, traders tend to recalibrate quickly, reassessing whether the current range represents a temporary pullback or the onset of a more meaningful downturn.

Advertisement

Ultimately, the question facing market participants is whether the bear-market thesis will hold in the near term or whether the combination of resistance, a potential death cross, and macro caution will be overridden by a potent, confidence-affirming catalyst. For now, the balance of evidence leans toward caution: the presence of tight ranges and overlapping moving averages suggests that a decisive breakout will require more than a routine swing; it will demand a convincing expansion of demand that can sustain price beyond the crossings and into a new structural regime.

Risk & affiliate notice: Crypto assets are volatile and capital is at risk. This article may contain affiliate links. Read full disclosure

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Crypto World

Four months on, MEV Capital falls victim to $4B DeFi daisy chain implosion

Published

on

Four months on, MEV Capital falls victim to $4B DeFi daisy chain implosion

Almost four months have passed since the devastating disassembly of a DeFi daisy chain, which saw the value of the so-called “yield vault” sector drop by over $4 billion.

Since then, many of the “risk curators” involved have kept a low profile, while others are keen to rebuild confidence.

Last week, it became clear that one such curator hadn’t managed to weather the storm.

MEV Capital dissolves

Last week, The Big Whale reported that MEV Capital would be taken over by one of its partners, Belem Capital. Citing DeFiLlama figures, the article highlights an 80% drop in MEV Capital’s assets under management, dropping from $1.5 billion to $300 million.

Advertisement

The drop-off was sparked by the firm’s exposure to looped-leverage yield strategies involving deUSD, which depegged in early November in response to the collapse of Stream Finance (not, as the article claims, in the infamous October 10 market crash).

Elixir announced it would discontinue deUSD shortly thereafter.

MEV Capital’s CEO Laurent Bourquin, “seems to have abruptly stepped back,” according to the article.

Additionally, asset tokenization platform Midas Capital disclosed that it had “concluded all business” with MEV Capital, handing management of mMEV and mevBTC to RockawayX. 

Advertisement

DeFi’s ‘risk curator reckoning’

In late October, worries began to circulate over the integrity of a number of high-yield vault tokens across the DeFi sector.

Days later, one of these risk curators, Stream Finance, collapsed spectacularly after admitting it had lost $93 million. With the quality of its backing exposed, Stream’s vault token, xUSD, lost 75% of its value.

Other assets in the “daisy chain” of recursive lending followed suit, notably Elexir’s deUSD.

The resulting domino effect saw a scramble to unwind leverage across a handful of projects. In all, almost half of the sector’s $10 billion in total value locked was wiped out over the following month.

Advertisement

It’s since recovered slightly, sitting at around $6 billion.

Some handled it better than others, with users often waiting weeks with no news. Risk curator Re7 Labs even made legal threats to a self-styled “whistleblower” who had publicly complained on behalf of depositors.

‘Any curators reading these reports?’

November’s yield vault apocalypse hinged on recursive lending and borrowing of vault tokens between interconnected projects.

More sustainable projects, however, went unscathed. They’ve increasingly leaned into “institutional-grade” offerings of on-chain, but somewhat more tangible, real world assets (RWA).

Advertisement

The aforementioned Midas Capital tokenizes off-chain funds such as Fasanara’s F-ONE (as mF-ONE), for example. These come with regular reporting on the state of off-chain assets.

However, some remain unconvinced, asking “any curators reading these reports?” in response to Midas’ recent disclosure of an inaccuracy in their mF-ONE reporting. Another X user called the reporting “trash,” pointing to delays and missing information.

It should be noted that both accounts are contributors at Yearn, a fully on-chain yield aggregator platform.

Read more: Yearn hacker loses $2.4M of $9M loot as tokens burned from wallet

Advertisement

Off-chain risk, now on-chain

DeFi is often seen as plenty risky enough, but it’s certainly not immune from outside risks.

A detailed December report from curator Steakhouse Financial drew attention to a 2% drop in Midas-tokenized fund mF-ONE, in line with the real-world version.

The dip wasn’t enough to cause any mF-ONE collateralized positions to be liquidated, but still raised eyebrows as a novel asset class in DeFi.

Last week, risk management firm Chaos Labs revisited the episode, pointing to “a bankrupt auto-parts supplier” as the source of the shortfall.

Advertisement

It makes the case that “yield is risk,” and that “off-chain doesn’t mean safe by default.”

Steakhouse, whose high-yield vault is exposed to mF-ONE, said the post contained “inaccuracies and selective presentations” and accused Chaos Labs of “plagiarismgooning and fudmaxxing.” 

Founder of Steakhouse, Sébastien Derivaux, insisted that mF-ONE is “fit for high yield vaults as collateral.”

Worth it?

The mechanics of bringing RWAs into DeFi are complex. They also make adhering to the maxim “don’t trust, verify,” reliant on issuers’ reporting on off-chain assets.

Advertisement

Even stranger, their use as collateral may even see lenders receiving lower yield than the collateral itself. Whilst assuming both counterparty and underlying asset risk.

Got a tip? Send us an email securely via Protos Leaks. For more informed news and investigations, follow us on XBluesky, and Google News, or subscribe to our YouTube channel.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

MEXC Expands Tokenized Stock Listings Through Ondo Finance Partnership

Published

on

Coinbase, Kraken, Stocks, Bitpanda, Tokenization, RWA Tokenization

Crypto exchange MEXC has expanded its tokenized equities offering through its partnership with Ondo Finance, listing new onchain representations of US stocks that trade against Tether on its platform.

According to company announcements this week, the expansion includes 17 newly listed tokenized stock pairs and seven additional tokens tied to US defense and energy companies.

The tokens are issued as ERC-20 assets on Ethereum and trade against Tether (USDT) pairs on the exchange. The underlying shares are held in regulated trust accounts and subject to quarterly third-party audits, with the tokens designed to represent ownership of the corresponding underlying equities.

A March 3 announcement introduced 17 additional tokenized stock pairs spanning sectors such as technology, healthcare and finance.

Advertisement

Trading fees for the 17 newly listed tokenized stock pairs will be waived for the first 30 days. The companies did not disclose the names of the individual companies included in the batch.

A separate release on Wednesday added seven tokenized equities tied to defense and energy companies, including Lockheed Martin (LMT), RTX (RTX), ConocoPhillips (COP) and Occidental Petroleum (OXY). Withdrawals for the newly listed tokens are scheduled to begin March 5.

The partnership builds on a series of tokenized equity listings MEXC has introduced with Ondo Finance since launching the product in September 2025. The 17 new pairs are the ninth expansion of the offering.

MEXC is a centralized cryptocurrency exchange founded in 2018 and offering spot and derivatives trading for digital assets. According to CoinMarketCap data, it is the ninth-largest exchange by spot trading volume.

Advertisement

Ondo Finance is a New York–based blockchain company that focuses on bringing traditional financial assets onchain through tokenization. At the time of writing, assets issued through Ondo total about $2.66 billion in tokenized value, according to RWA.xyz data.

Coinbase, Kraken, Stocks, Bitpanda, Tokenization, RWA Tokenization
Source: RWA.xyz

Related: Kraken debuts tokenized stock perpetual futures for non-US traders

Crypto exchanges move to tokenize assets

The race among crypto exchanges to tokenize stocks has been gaining momentum.

In June, more than 60 tokenized equities became available on exchanges including Kraken and Bybit through Backed Finance’s xStocks product. The lineup included major companies such as Apple, Amazon, Nvidia, Tesla, Meta and Netflix.

Gemini has also moved into the sector through a partnership with Dinari. In July, the exchange said customers in the European Union could trade a growing list of tokenized US stocks on its platform, including shares tied to companies such as Exxon, Sony, BlackRock and Visa.

Advertisement

To be sure, tokenized equities remain largely unavailable to US users as the industry awaits clearer regulatory guidance for blockchain-based securities.

In the meantime, several exchanges are expanding into traditional equities through brokerage-style services. In April, Kraken said it would begin offering trading in about 11,000 US-listed stocks and exchange-traded funds as part of a phased rollout across the United States.

Over the past few months, Coinbase and Bitpanda have also announced stock trading features that allow users to buy and sell equities alongside cryptocurrencies on the same platforms.

Advertisement

Magazine: Bitcoin may face hard fork over any attempt to freeze Satoshi’s coins