Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Crypto World

Bitcoin sinks further due to tariff turmoil, bearish sentiment

Published

on

Bitcoin sinks further due to tariff turmoil, bearish sentiment - 2

Bitcoin dropped to fresh lows around $73,000 on Tuesday, its lowest point since early 2025, and is now down more than 15% year-to-date.

Summary

  • Bitcoin has continued its downward trend since its October 2025 record high, partly triggered by President Trump’s tariff comments.
  • Despite supportive policies from a pro-crypto White House and strong institutional interest, Bitcoin’s market has been under pressure.
  • Bitcoin still trading more like a high-risk asset than “digital gold.”

Gold, meanwhile, posted its largest single-day gain since November 2008, recovering from a sharp decline earlier in the week, while silver surged by as much as 15% after a dramatic 27% crash on Friday.

Both metals’ sell-offs were triggered by President Trump’s Fed Chair nomination, Kevin Warsh, which tightened expectations on rate cuts and balance-sheet policy.

Advertisement
Bitcoin sinks further due to tariff turmoil, bearish sentiment - 2
Source: CoinGecko

Meanwhile, Bitcoin’s (BTC) drop, over 6% on the day, following a broader crypto slump, with Ethereum falling to $2,100.

The $65,000 level is now emerging as a focal point for market participants. This area represents not just a psychological round number, but a dense cluster of technical confluences that historically attract demand.

Bulls need to reclaim the $87,551 level to reverse the bearish trend, though that seems unlikely in the current market environment. Immediate resistance sits at $80,000 and $84,000.

Massive Selloffs

The cryptocurrency’s drop follows a turbulent year, marked by a steep decline from its October 2025 peak, when it hit a record high.

A series of market-moving events, including President Trump’s tariff comments, triggered a massive selloff that wiped out $19 billion in leveraged bets, with Bitcoin tumbling over 40% since then, according to Bloomberg.

Advertisement

Despite supportive policies from Trump, who pledged to turn the U.S. into the world’s “crypto capital,” Bitcoin has struggled to regain momentum, now testing critical support levels below $75,000.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Crypto World

Decentralized Compute Has Failed

Published

on

Decentralized Compute Has Failed

Opinion by: Leo Fan, founder of Cysic

Decentralized compute has failed. Not because it can’t find you a cheap GPU; it’s actually quite good at that. The problem is that every major network today still forces you to trust the node operator with your data and results. 

We have replaced Amazon’s login page with a wallet connection and called it Web3.

A staggering $2 billion to $3 billion was poured into “decentralized cloud” tokens from 2023 to 2025. Yet none of the top players can give a smart contract mathematical certainty that the work was done correctly. Zero-knowledge rollups, onchain AI agents and fully trustless apps remain impossible at scale.

Advertisement

The entire sector has decentralized supply and payments. Trust is still centralized. Until verification is cryptographic, “decentralized compute” is just Airbnb for GPUs.

The marketplace mirage

Current leaders are sophisticated spot markets, nothing more. Akash pulled in about $11 million in Q3 2025 revenue. Render managed about $18 million. Impressive for coordination layers, sure, but trivial next to AWS’s $100 billion-plus annual run rate.

These networks solved the easy part, idle GPU discovery and crypto payments, and declared victory. Their proof-of-work done? Usually, just “the node streamed the result plus some reputation score.”

That’s not verification. That’s a pinky promise with extra steps.

Advertisement

Real-world failures are already happening. In 2025, bad actors returned corrupted Blender renders through Render’s network. No onchain way to detect it. Io.net caught a Sybil cluster gaming reputation scores in May and further failures in November with aPriori’s mysterious Sybil cluster that claimed 60% of the airdrop across 14,000 wallets. Gensyn’s own whitepaper admits their “learning game” tolerates less than 49% malicious tolerance in practice.

These are the predictable outcomes when you replace mathematical proofs with social enforcement.

Think about what this means for actual use cases. A Layer 2 rollup outsourcing STARK proofs to any current decloud still needs a trusted multisig or single honest prover. The centralization risk remains unchanged. An autonomous agent doing inference on io.net? The on-chain contract can’t tell if the LLM output was correct or backdoored. We’ve recreated the oracle problem with more steps.

Breaking Web3’s core promise

Bitcoin never asked you to trust miners. Ethereum doesn’t require faith in validators. They gave you ways to verify. Today’s compute networks do the opposite:

Advertisement

“Here’s your result. Trust me, bro, and we’ll slash if someone complains.”

This philosophical mismatch kills the entire value proposition. The Total Addressable Market (TAM) for “decentralized GPU” gets capped at rendering and basic training because nobody will run sensitive workloads on networks where nodes see your plaintext data, such as DeFi bots, medical inference, and proprietary models.

Vitalik nailed it at Devcon 2024:

“If your scaling solution reintroduces trusted parties, you haven’t scaled. You’ve just outsourced.” 

Advertisement

That’s exactly what we’ve done. We outsourced AWS to a thousand smaller AWS nodes and patted ourselves on the back.

The market size illusion becomes clear when you do the math. Without verifiable execution, you can’t serve. Financial institutions need provable compliance. Healthcare systems require an auditable inference. Rollups demand trustless proof generation. AI agents must execute high-value transactions.

Related: Institutions must stake Ether on decentralized infrastructure

You’re left competing for Stable Diffusion hobbyists and Blender farms. Good luck building a trillion-dollar market on that.

Advertisement

The only path forward

Real decentralized compute requires cryptographic proof accompanying every result, including zkSNARKs, STARKs or optimistic fraud proofs, that are verifiable in under a second by any smart contract.

This isn’t theoretical anymore. Hardware-accelerated proving stacks using FPGAs and custom ASICs make this economically viable at GPU-scale bandwidth. The 2024-2025 ZPrize winners showed STARKs over cycle-accurate circuits running in under eight seconds on the latest FPGA clusters, heading toward sub-second on next-gen silicon.

When this verification layer exists, everything changes. A $10,000 DeFi agent can run private AlphaTensor-level reasoning onchain. Rollups can outsource proofs to 10,000 untrusted nodes with zero risk. Inference becomes as trustless as checking an Ethereum balance.

Open, permissionless networks of specialized provers will compete on latency and cost. But the key difference is that dishonesty becomes mathematically impossible, not just expensive. No reputation systems. No slashing games. Just math.

Advertisement

The real revolution

We didn’t decentralize compute by turning GPUs into an open market. That’s like saying we decentralized money by letting people trade dollars on DEXs.

We’ll deserve the name when computational results become as unforgeable as Bitcoin transactions are unspendable without the private key. It’s impossible to fake, trivial to check.

The breakthrough Web3 needs isn’t another 5% cheaper GPU hour. It’s the first network that can attach an unbreakable proof of correctness to every teraflop. That’s the infrastructure we were promised. Everything else is just a centralized cloud with extra steps.

Opinion by: Leo Fan, founder of Cysic

Advertisement