Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Crypto World

Bitcoin Whales Accumulate Again at $71K, Santiment

Published

on

Crypto Breaking News

Bitcoin (CRYPTO: BTC) has hovered near the $71,000 level as large holders ramp up exposure, according to Santiment’s latest weekly assessment. The analysis highlights a renewed shift by wallets that hold 10 to 10,000 BTC, which Santiment described as a bullish signal if it endures. The share of the total supply controlled by this cohort rose to 68.17% from 68.07% a week earlier, signaling a persistent tilt toward big holders even as prices stabilize. Retail demand, meanwhile, remains fragile; the Crypto Fear & Greed Index was in Extreme Fear at 16 on Sunday, underscoring ongoing caution among everyday investors. Bitcoin was around $71,350 at the time of publication, marking a roughly 6% rise over the past week. On the liquidity side, US spot BTC ETFs logged their first five-day inflow streak of 2026, bringing in roughly $767.32 million this week, a reminder that regulated products continue to channel capital into the market.

For context, Santiment’s notes on on-chain behavior were complemented by a broader view of market sentiment. The firm’s observations on wholesale accumulation come as traders weigh the implications of a shift in ownership toward larger addresses. The wholesale activity is particularly relevant when juxtaposed with the persistence of cautious sentiment among retail participants, a dynamic that has characterized much of Bitcoin’s range-bound work over recent months. The interplay between accumulation by whales and the slower pace of retail adoption has created a tug-of-war that market participants are watching closely, especially in areas where technicals align with on-chain signals to form a potential base for price stability.

In a separate frame of reference, the market has been responding to regulatory and product-structure developments that shape how new participants access Bitcoin. ETF inflows, now aided by a broader appetite for regulated exposure, can lend a degree of liquidity that supports price discovery. At the same time, analysts caution that this is not a simple, linear uptrend; episodes of volatility can arise if large holders react to evolving risk cues or if retail conviction fluctuates sharply. The balance between on-chain momentum and macro-driven appetite for regulated products continues to define Bitcoin’s core narrative as the year progresses.

Past on-chain patterns also color expectations. A week earlier, Santiment noted a marked reversal among whales after a sprint of buying earlier in the month. In a Mar. 6 report, the firm highlighted that whales had sold roughly 66% of the Bitcoin they had purchased between Feb. 23 and Mar. 3, just as Bitcoin breached the $70,000 level and briefly touched $74,000. The takeaway is not that whales cannot sustain accumulation, but that their activity can pivot rapidly in response to price moves, implying that a potential bottom may require a clearer alignment of broader market participants around a stable price range. The market’s tendency to reward the consensus with a lag remains a recurring theme that analysts stress when evaluating the durability of any bottom signal. Willy Woo, a prominent on-chain commentator, recently framed Bitcoin’s price action as “solidly in the middle of its bear market through a lens of long-range liquidity,” a reminder that structural factors can influence how the market transitions from caution to confidence over time.

Advertisement

The current environment also reflects a broader appetite for regulated crypto exposure. The five-day inflow streak into US spot Bitcoin ETFs is a notable marker of renewed institutional interest, a trend that has historically added a layer of liquidity and can help moderate sharp downside moves. The inflows come as traders observe how on-chain activity interacts with price levels and how new participants engage with the asset through regulated vehicles. While this liquidity backdrop can support a steadier price path, it does not by itself guarantee a sustained rally, particularly in a market where sentiment remains guarded and retail participation shows mixed signals. In the mix of factors shaping near-term moves, the balance between whales’ accumulation and retail behavior, alongside evolving ETF dynamics, will likely influence Bitcoin’s trajectory over the coming weeks.

Key takeaways

  • Whale accumulation around $71k offers a potential floor if the trend persists, signaling renewed on-chain demand from large holders.
  • The rising share of supply held by wallets with 10–10,000 BTC suggests ownership concentration is increasing, which could impact price dynamics if these addresses sustain net buying.
  • Retail demand remains a wildcard, with Extreme Fear readings implying a cautious market that could slow any rapid upside despite bullish on-chain signals.
  • Regulated exposure via US spot BTC ETFs contributed to a five-day inflow streak of roughly $767.32 million, adding liquidity that can influence near-term price action.
  • Historical whale behavior—selling into strength—serves as a reminder that large holders can shift momentum quickly, creating risk for a sustained rally without broader participation.

Tickers mentioned: $BTC

Sentiment: Neutral

Price impact: Positive. Bitcoin’s price has moved higher in the week, reflecting on-chain accumulation and improving liquidity conditions from ETF inflows.

Trading idea (Not Financial Advice): Hold. The current mix of whale accumulation and cautious retail sentiment suggests waiting for clearer directional cues before committing to a new position.

Advertisement

Market context: A liquidity backdrop is evolving as US spot BTC ETFs post renewed inflows, complementing on-chain signals and shaping potential price moves as investors reassess risk and regulatory considerations.

Why it matters

On-chain behavior remains a critical lens through which investors assess Bitcoin’s near-term health. The consolidation of ownership among larger addresses can indicate a readiness to anchor prices at higher levels, especially if these participants sustain their accumulation into key support zones. If whales continue to accumulate while smaller holders trim their activity, the market could be positioning for a more durable base rather than a transient spike. This dynamic matters because it can reduce the likelihood of rapid, sharp declines and increase the odds of a steadier ascent should risk sentiment improve modestly.

Retail sentiment, captured by the Fear & Greed Index, matters because it often acts as a contrarian indicator. When everyday investors grow increasingly optimistic, the market may face a pullback if the enthusiasm outpaces underlying fundamentals. Conversely, persistent caution can delay upside while prices remain tethered to macro and on-chain cues. The emergence of ETF inflows adds another layer to the equation: while inflows are not a guarantee of a sustained rally, they can augment liquidity and provide a stepping-stone for broader participation, including institutional players who seek regulated exposure. Together, these factors sketch a market that could wobble near a confluence of on-chain signals, regulatory dynamics, and liquidity shifts rather than follow a simple, predictable trajectory.

In practical terms, traders and investors should watch how whale and retail balances evolve in tandem. A sustained rise in the share of BTC held by the 10–10,000 BTC cohort could reinforce a floor, especially if accompanied by continued ETF inflows. However, a resurgence in retail buying could introduce additional volatility, particularly if it coincides with macro developments or shifting risk appetite. The market’s path forward will likely hinge on the resilience of on-chain signals and the depth of liquidity provided by regulated products as the year progresses.

Advertisement

What to watch next

  • Monitor the balance between whale and retail wallet activity; a persistent tilt toward large holders could support a higher floor.
  • Track the Crypto Fear & Greed Index for shifts in sentiment that could precede a change in buying patterns.
  • Observe ETF inflows beyond this week’s levels to gauge whether regulated exposure remains a tailwind for liquidity and price discovery.
  • Watch price action around $71k and nearby psychological levels to assess how momentum players respond to resistance zones.
  • Stay alert to macro developments and regulatory signals that could alter risk appetite for the crypto sector.

Sources & verification

  • Santiment weekly summary on wallet balances and the share of supply held by 10–10,000 BTC addresses.
  • On-chain discussion of whale dynamics and potential bottom formation from Santiment.
  • Crypto Fear & Greed Index reading (Extreme Fear) for the period referenced.
  • Bitcoin price context around $71,350 with seven-day performance data (CoinMarketCap).
  • U.S. spot Bitcoin ETF inflows totaling approximately $767.32 million in the week reviewed.

Risk & affiliate notice: Crypto assets are volatile and capital is at risk. This article may contain affiliate links. Read full disclosure

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Crypto World

China and India Account for Nearly Half of Global Gold Demand, Data Shows

Published

on

Gold Price Performance

Gold has dropped nearly 10% since the US-Iran war erupted, as rising oil prices sidelined investors. However, strong emerging market demand is keeping the market grounded.

Data from The Kobeissi Letter shows that emerging economies have accounted for roughly 70% of global gold demand over the past decade. Within this, China and India alone accounted for nearly half of global purchases, highlighting their outsized influence on the market.

Follow us on X to get the latest news as it happens

Gold Price Performance
Gold Price Performance. Source: TradingView

China and India Drive Structural Gold Demand

China remains the largest contributor, accounting for 27% of global gold demand. According to the World Gold Council, the People’s Bank of China extended its gold-buying streak to a 17th consecutive month in March.

It increased reserves by 5 tonnes to 2,313 tonnes, about 9% of its total foreign reserves. Overall, China added 7 tonnes of gold in the first quarter.

Advertisement

“The plummeting local gold price did not interrupt Chinese investor appetite for gold ETFs. In March, the CSI300 stock index fell 6% and the local currency depreciated by 0.8% against the dollar; these factors, combined with safe-haven demand prompted by the US-Israel-Iran war, and continued regional geopolitical tensions, supported local gold ETF buying. We also witnessed some dip buying during the first half of the month,” the blog read.

India ranked as the second-largest contributor, accounting for 21% of global demand. According to ASSOCHAM, Indian households hold gold valued at approximately $5 trillion, exceeding the combined reserves of the world’s top 10 central banks.

Separately, the World Gold Council estimates that Indian household and temple holdings total around 25,000 tonnes, worth roughly $2.4 trillion.

This represents nearly 56% of India’s projected nominal GDP for 2026, highlighting the metal’s deep cultural and financial significance in the country.

Outside Asia, North America and Europe contributed 11% and 12% of global gold demand, respectively, indicating a comparatively smaller role in shaping long-term consumption trends.

Advertisement

On the supply side, mine production remains the dominant source, accounting for 74% of total global output. Africa leads global supply with a 26% share, followed by Asia at 19%. The Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS), Central and South America each contribute around 15%, while North America accounts for 14%.

Thus, while geopolitical tensions and oil prices have pressured gold in the short term, underlying demand from emerging markets, particularly China and India, remains a strong structural foundation.

Subscribe to our YouTube channel to watch leaders and journalists provide expert insights

The post China and India Account for Nearly Half of Global Gold Demand, Data Shows appeared first on BeInCrypto.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

SpaceX IPO: Is Elon Musk’s $1.75T Public Debut Worth the Risk?

Published

on

Brian Armstrong's Bold Prediction: AI Agents Will Soon Dominate Global Financial

Key Takeaways

  • SpaceX has submitted confidential IPO paperwork targeting a $1.75 trillion market cap with plans to raise $75 billion
  • AI giants OpenAI and Anthropic may also debut publicly in 2026, with combined valuations potentially exceeding $3 trillion
  • While IPO volume has dropped 41.5% in 2026, capital raised has surged 35% as larger companies dominate
  • Historical data reveals mega-IPOs typically decline in their first half-year: major debuts since 1999 averaged 10% losses
  • The aerospace company generated approximately $16 billion in revenue and $8 billion in profits during 2025

Elon Musk’s SpaceX has submitted confidential documentation for a public stock offering that could shatter all previous IPO records. The aerospace manufacturer is pursuing a staggering $1.75 trillion market capitalization while seeking to secure $75 billion through the public markets.

Should this valuation materialize, SpaceX would climb ahead of Tesla to become America’s eighth-most-valuable publicly traded corporation.

Musk, who simultaneously leads Tesla, has already demonstrated his ability to generate exceptional returns — Tesla shareholders have enjoyed roughly 23,000% gains since the electric vehicle maker’s 2010 market debut. Many are wondering if SpaceX can replicate that extraordinary performance.

SpaceX generated approximately $16 billion in annual revenue throughout 2025, alongside $8 billion in net profits. These figures place the company on remarkably solid financial ground compared to typical IPO candidates.

The aerospace giant operates Starlink, its satellite-based internet service, and recently completed a merger with Musk’s xAI venture, which encompasses both the Grok artificial intelligence system and the X social platform.

Advertisement

SpaceX isn’t the only tech titan preparing for a public market entrance. Artificial intelligence powerhouses OpenAI and Anthropic are both anticipated to submit IPO filings before 2026 concludes. The trio’s combined market value could surpass $3 trillion.

David Solomon, Goldman Sachs’ chief executive, recently noted during an earnings discussion that equity markets have demonstrated “exceptional strength” and suggested IPO momentum may intensify. Meanwhile, Morgan Stanley’s CEO Ted Pick observed that investor standards for new public offerings remain “exceptionally elevated” under current market conditions.

The Evolving IPO Environment

The 2026 IPO landscape reflects a clear trend toward quality over quantity. By mid-April, just 38 companies valued above $50 million had completed public debuts — representing a 41.5% year-over-year decline. Despite fewer listings, total capital raised has climbed 35% to reach $13.3 billion, per Renaissance Capital’s tracking.

This week witnessed Madison Air, a filtration systems manufacturer, complete 2026’s largest IPO to date, securing $2.2 billion at a $13.3 billion valuation. Shares jumped nearly 20% during opening trading. Defense technology company Arxis pulled in $1.1 billion and saw its stock surge 38% on day one.

Advertisement

However, not every 2026 IPO has celebrated success. Cryptocurrency platform BitGo, oncology-focused biotech Eikon Therapeutics, and diabetes technology developer MiniMed are all currently trading substantially beneath their initial offering prices.

Historical Patterns Suggest Caution

While enthusiasm surrounding SpaceX runs high, historical performance data suggests investors should temper expectations for the immediate post-IPO period.

Since 1999, the largest market debuts have consistently struggled during their first six months as public companies. Facebook plummeted 38% within half a year of trading. Alibaba declined 9%, General Motors slipped 8%, and Saudi Aramco shed 15%. Only Visa bucked the trend, climbing 23%. Collectively, these mega-IPOs averaged approximately 10% losses during their first six months.

If SpaceX follows this historical pattern with a 10% drop, investors would witness roughly $175 billion in market capitalization evaporate.

Advertisement

Retail investors must also consider whether the most significant appreciation has already occurred during private funding stages. While pre-IPO investment vehicles from ARK Invest, Robinhood, and Baron Capital provide some access, these funds have experienced considerable volatility throughout the past year.

SpaceX has yet to disclose when it will publicly file its registration statement or establish a definitive timeline for beginning public trading.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Tempo’s ‘Zones’ Promise Privacy But Raise Trust Concerns

Published

on

Privacy, Stablecoin, zk-Rollup, Institutions

Tempo unveiled a new “Zones” feature Thursday aimed at giving enterprises bank-style privacy on public stablecoin rails, but not everyone in crypto is convinced the trade-offs are worth it.

The payments-focused layer-1, co-developed with backing from Stripe and Paradigm, said Zones will let companies run transactions in permissioned environments while still tapping public blockchain liquidity. The pitch targets a long-standing issue for institutions: sensitive data like payroll, merchant volumes or treasury activity being exposed on public ledgers.

Some privacy-focused developers argue that the design sacrifices too much. Because each Zone is controlled by an operator that can see full transaction data and suspend a user’s ability to transfer or withdraw funds based on its own compliance rules, critics say it introduces centralized trust assumptions closer to an exchange than a trust-minimized blockchain.

The debate reflects a broader divide in crypto infrastructure as projects compete for institutional adoption. While Tempo is betting on simplicity and interoperability, rivals are leaning into advanced cryptography to keep transaction data confidential end-to-end.

Advertisement

Tempo’s Zones aim to hide enterprise flows

Tempo says that Zones are structured as parallel, permissioned chains attached to Tempo’s main network, designed for use cases such as payroll, fund management and B2B settlements. Companies can transact inside these environments while assets remain interoperable with the public chain, other Zones and shared liquidity pools.

Privacy, Stablecoin, zk-Rollup, Institutions
Tempo Zones. Source: Tempo

Each Zone is run by an operator that controls access and has visibility into transactions, while the public network verifies batched state updates and proofs. Tempo says this approach preserves the benefits of a public blockchain while offering the compliance and auditability enterprises expect from traditional financial systems.

Related: XRP Ledger taps Boundless for bank-grade privacy on public blockchains

While some projects rely on advanced cryptography to hide transaction data and provide user anonymity, Tempo argues that these approaches “introduce unnecessary operational complexity and usability tradeoffs.”

Some rivals prefer cryptographic privacy

Tempo’s operator-centric model has drawn criticism from some builders, who argue it weakens both privacy and self-custody. If a single party can access transaction data and control availability, they say, users are effectively trusting an intermediary rather than relying on cryptographic guarantees.

Advertisement

Projects like ZKSync, for example, rely on private chains anchored to public networks using zero-knowledge proofs. Arcium is exploring distributed models where data remains encrypted across nodes and only verified outputs are revealed, and Zama uses fully homomorphic encryption to enable computation on encrypted data.

Ghazi Ben Amor, senior vice president, business development at Zama, told Cointelegraph that, while the underlying cryptographic algorithms are “indeed extremely complex,” Zama abstracts that complexity and allows developers to code the smart contracts using Solidity and without any prior knowledge of cryptography.

He said that enterprises using Zama Protocol “don’t even notice any cryptography is operating behind the scene,” and argued that Tempo’s Zones are essentially private blockchains, no different from existing centralized payment systems, which have proven their limitations in terms of scalability.

Tempo did not immediately respond to Cointelegraph’s request for additional comment.

Advertisement

Magazine: Will the CLARITY Act be good — or bad — for DeFi?