Crypto World
Develop a Hyper Casual Game Like Flappy Bird in 2 Weeks
The hyper casual gaming market moves faster than almost any other segment in the gaming industry. Trends emerge overnight, player attention shifts quickly, and the games that capture momentum early often dominate downloads and ad revenue. In this environment, speed is not just an advantage, it is a business strategy.
A Flappy Bird–style hyper casual game, built around a simple yet addictive core loop, remains one of the most powerful formats for rapid market entry. Its simplicity allows faster development, faster testing, and faster monetization validation.
However, here is the reality many enterprises tend to overlook. Building a hyper casual game in 2 weeks is not about rushing development. It is all about having the right development team, pipeline, and production discipline.
When executed correctly by a trusted hyper casual game development company, a 2-week MVP can help enterprises test concepts, validate monetization models, and enter the market before competitors react.
Why Flappy Bird–Style Games Are Ideal for Rapid Development
Flappy Bird–style games are often misunderstood as “easy to build.” In reality, they are simple in structure but demanding in execution. Their minimalism is precisely what enables speed but also what exposes poor quality quickly. When a game has only one mechanic, there is nowhere to hide flaws. These games succeed because they:
- Deliver instant engagement
- Require zero onboarding time
- Encourage repeated play
- Generate strong ad impressions per session
- Create addictive retry loops
However, for enterprises, the appeal is strategic rather than just creative. A Flappy Bird–style game allows businesses to:
- Validate a concept quickly
- Test a theme or brand engagement
- Trial monetization models
- Enter a new market with minimal delay
- Gather behavioral data rapidly
The short session design also aligns perfectly with ad-driven monetization, making them commercially viable testing tools. However, achieving this requires expert tuning, such as physics, input response, and difficulty curves must feel precise. Otherwise, players churn within minutes. This is exactly the reason why experienced hyper casual game developers matter.
What a Realistic 2-Week Development Timeline Looks Like
A credible 2-week timeline is structured, not chaotic. It follows a clear production plan.
Days 1–2: Concept Finalization & Scope Lock
The team defines:
- Core gameplay loop
- Visual direction
- Monetization approach
- Target platform
- Success KPIs
This stage prevents scope creep and keeps production focused. Enterprises that skip proper scoping often face delays later.
Days 3–6: Core Development
Developers build:
- Player controls
- Physics tuning
- Game loop logic
- UI framework
- Base art assets
At this stage, the goal is playability, not perfection. A professional hyper casual game development company uses reusable frameworks to accelerate this phase.
Days 7–10: Polish & Monetization Integration
This includes:
- Ad network integration
- Rewarded ad logic
- Basic analytics setup
- UI polish
- Sound and feedback tuning
Monetization is integrated early to validate revenue potential.
Days 11–14: Testing & Soft Launch Prep
The focus now shifts to:
- Bug fixes
- Performance optimization
- Device compatibility
- Soft launch build preparation
Testing ensures the game feels stable and smooth across devices.
Why the “Right Team” Matters More Than the Timeline
A 2-week build is only realistic when the hyper casual game development team has:
- Proper hyper casual game development experience & expertise
- Proven pipelines
- Reusable code frameworks
- Structured production workflows
- Clear communication loops
Without these, a 2-week target becomes unrealistic. The right team turns speed into a repeatable process rather than a risky gamble.
Planning to Build a Hyper Casual Game Like Flappy Bird in Quick Time?
Business Benefits of a 2-Week Hyper Casual MVP
A 2-week MVP is not about saving time alone. It is about creating a structured experimentation cycle. For enterprises, this becomes a business strategy.
1. Fast Market Validation
A rapid MVP allows enterprises to test hypotheses instead of relying on assumptions. Rather than debating whether an idea will work, companies can:
- Launch quickly
- Measure retention
- Track session lengths
- Analyze user behavior
- Evaluate monetization performance
This plays a significant role in replacing guesswork with real data. For decision-makers, this data-driven approach reduces strategic uncertainty and supports smarter investment decisions.
2. Lower Initial Investment Risk
Traditional game development often demands significant upfront budgets. Hyper casual MVPs allow staged investment. Enterprises can:
- Test multiple ideas simultaneously
- Scale only the winners
- Drop underperforming concepts early
- Optimize budget allocation
This portfolio-style strategy is widely used by successful publishers. Instead of betting big on one idea, enterprises run controlled experiments.
3. Competitive Speed Advantage
In hyper casual game development, timing influences success heavily. Launching early allows a company to:
- Capture user attention before trends peak
- Establish early app store presence
- Gain organic installs
- Collect data before competitors enter
Even a few weeks can determine whether a concept feels fresh or saturated. Speed becomes a competitive moat.
4. Data-Driven Scaling Decisions
A soft-launched MVP produces valuable metrics such as:
- Day 1 and Day 7 retention
- Ad engagement rates
- CPI vs LTV performance
- Drop-off points
This data, in turn, plays a crucial role in informing:
- Whether to invest further
- Which features to expand
- How to refine monetization
- Which markets to target
Enterprises that scale based on data outperform those relying on intuition.
Common Factors That Delay Hyper Casual Game Development
Hyper casual game development projects often slow down due to avoidable issues.
1. Changing Scope Midway
Scope creep is the biggest enemy of rapid development. Adding some features all of a sudden, like:
- Extra levels
- Complex UI
- Narrative elements
- Multiplayer modes
Quickly breaks the 2-week timeline. Successful teams lock scope early and treat the MVP as a test, not a final product.
2. Overcomplicating Mechanics
Hyper casual games thrive on simplicity. When teams add:
- Multiple controls
- Advanced progression
- Layered systems
The game loses clarity, and development slows. Enterprises must respect the “one core loop” philosophy.
3. Ignoring Analytics Setup
Without analytics, an MVP loses its purpose. Analytics track:
- Retention
- User behavior
- Monetization efficiency
Skipping this step means launching blind. Enterprises should view analytics as essential, not optional.
4. Skipping Early Testing
Unpolished physics or laggy controls ruin user experience. Even some of the simplest games need:
- Device testing
- Performance checks
- Input responsiveness tuning
Quality issues harm retention immediately.
5. Lack of Structured Pipeline
Ad-hoc development wastes time. A structured pipeline, on the other hand, includes:
- Pre-defined frameworks
- Asset templates
- Clear milestones
- Reusable systems
Experienced teams rely on repeatable processes.
Why Enterprises Partner with a Hyper Casual Game Development Company
Building internally may seem attractive, but it often slows execution. A specialized hyper casual game development company provides:
1. Speed-Ready Pipelines
They use proven frameworks, reducing setup time. This, in turn, allows faster prototyping and iteration.
2. Monetization Expertise
The revenue model of hyper casual games depends on ads and a retention balance. Experts optimize:
- Ad frequency
- Placement strategy
- Rewarded formats
Poor monetization design hurts revenue.
3. Analytics Integration
Professionals set up tracking from day one. This ensures every launch produces usable insights.
4. Performance Optimization
Players in the hyper casual gaming model expect instant load and smooth play. Developers therefore optimize for:
- Low memory usage
- Smooth FPS
- Fast loading times
5. Rapid Iteration Capability
Experienced teams iterate weekly or even faster. This allows constant improvement post-launch.
Conclusion
In hyper casual gaming, ideas alone do not win. Execution speed does. A Flappy Bird–style hyper casual game built in 2 weeks can become a powerful validation tool, revenue channel, or user acquisition engine when developed correctly.
However, the real question is not whether it can be built quickly. The ideal question is whether it is built by an experienced hyper casual game development team that knows how to make speed work in your favor.
Antier, a top-rated hyper casual game development company, works with enterprises and studios to deliver hyper casual games quickly without compromising quality. The support from the team includes:
- End-to-end hyper casual development
- Monetization-ready builds
- Analytics integration
- Rapid MVP pipelines
- Post-launch optimization
The focus is not just launching fast; it is launching smart. Get in touch with us today to build your next hyper casual hit.
Frequently Asked Questions
01. Why are Flappy Bird-style games considered ideal for rapid development in the hyper casual gaming market?
Flappy Bird-style games are ideal for rapid development because their simple structure allows for quick concept validation, minimal onboarding time, and strong ad impressions, making them effective tools for testing and monetization.
02. What is the significance of having the right development team for building a hyper casual game in 2 weeks?
The right development team is crucial for building a hyper casual game in 2 weeks as it ensures proper execution, structured production discipline, and the ability to deliver a high-quality MVP that can validate concepts and monetization models effectively.
03. What does a realistic 2-week development timeline for a hyper casual game involve?
A realistic 2-week development timeline involves a structured plan that includes days for concept finalization, scope locking, defining the core gameplay loop, visual direction, and monetization approach, ensuring a focused and efficient development process.
Investment manager Brevan Howard’s cryptocurrency fund fell almost 30% last year as the bitcoin bull run faltered, the Financial Times (FT) reported on Wednesday.
The BH Digital Asset fund lost 29.5% of its value, its worst performance in a calendar year since its inception in 2021, according to the report, which cited people familiar with the fund’s performance. The fund underperformed bitcoin, which lost 6% in the period.
BH Digital Asset, which invests in crypto tokens and digital asset-related companies, enjoyed gains of 43% and 52% in 2023 and 2024, respectively, as the crypto market recovered from the lows of 2022 and the bitcoin price eclipsed $100,000 in December 2024.
“There are a lot of private equity and venture capital type instruments [in BH Digital Asset],” said one hedge fund investor, according to the FT’s report. “They have underperformed bitcoin but to give them credit, last year was terrible for crypto.”
Brevan Howard did not immediately respond to CoinDesk’s request for further comment.
It was only a matter of time before “vibe-coded” smart contracts led to a significant loss of funds and on Sunday, an oracle misconfiguration led to users of DeFi lending platform Moonwell being liquidated for a total of 1,096 Coinbase Wrapped Staked Ether (cbETH).
The protocol was also saddled with $1.8 million worth of bad debt as a result.
The error was introduced in pull request 578, submitted by Moonwell core contributor “anajuliabit” and co-authored by Claude Opus 4.6.
Including this incident, Moonwell has suffered three oracle malfunctions in the past six months, leading to over $7 million in bad debt.
Read more: Claude AI plugins can now vibe code smart contracts
cbETH = $1.12
Moonwell’s post-mortem report states that, this time, the issue lies in calculating the dollar price of cbETH.
“The oracle used only the raw cbETH/ETH exchange rate. This misconfiguration caused the oracle to report cbETH’s price as approximately $1.12 (reflecting the cbETH/ETH ratio of ~1.12) rather than the intended market value of roughly $2,200,” the report explains.
As a result, the error “wiped out most or all of the cbETH collateral for many borrowers.”
A total of 1,096 cbETH was liquidated. In turn, $1.78 million worth of bad debt was generated for the protocol.
Monitoring systems picked up the discrepancy and strict borrow and supply caps were set to prevent further interaction.
Despite this, liquidation of existing positions continued. Any oracle correction requires “a five-day governance voting and timelock period, which could not be bypassed.”
Trading Strategy’s Mikko Ohtamaa pointed out that “regardless of whether the code is written by an AI or by a human, these kinds of errors are caught in an automated integration test suite.”
He highlights that Claude can even write these tests itself, but that in this case “there was no test case for price sanity.”
Others highlighted the contributor’s GitHub profile which shows an extremely high workrate, over 1,000 commits in the past week.
Read more: Clawdbot creator Peter Steinberger: ‘Crypto folks, stop harassing me’
The dark side of the moon
Moonwell is a lending protocol active on the Base, Optimism, and Moonbeam networks. It holds around $90 million in total value locked (TVL), according to DeFiLlama data, down from a peak of $380 million in August last year.
Since then, the project has suffered a number of hiccups.
DeFi commentary account “Yieldsandmore” details two further incidents in recent months. The first came during last year’s infamous October 10 crash, when a pricing discrepancy between Chainlink feeds and decentralized exchanges on Base led to $12 million in liquidations and $1.7 million of bad debt.
The second came less than a month later, on November 4, when the $129 million Balancer hack had a knock on effect on Moonwell’s market-based wrsETH/ETH oracle, leading to $3.7 million of bad debt.
The two incidents were apparently exploited by the same attacker, who is “clearly constantly scanning Moonwell for extractable value.”
Previously, 2022’s $190 million Nomad Bridge hack devastated the protocol’s Moonbeam deployment, its sole instance at the time.
The incident saw TVL drop 80%, from over $100 million to just $21 million.
Got a tip? Send us an email securely via Protos Leaks. For more informed news, follow us on X, Bluesky, and Google News, or subscribe to our YouTube channel.
[PRESS RELEASE – Panama City, Republic of Panama, February 18th, 2026]
Sai today launched Sai Perps, a perpetuals trading platform built to be as fast and intuitive as a centralized exchange with the transparency and self-custody of on-chain settlement. The platform features gasless transactions, removing friction for traders while maintaining full on-chain security.
Sai also unveiled Let’s Go Saicho, a one-month on-chain trading competition running from February 18 through March 19, 2026, with $25,000 in total prizes. The campaign is structured in two phases designed to reward both performance and participation: a PNL competition for profitable traders, followed by a first-come, first-serve “Be Early” phase for traders who engage early and hit a minimum volume threshold.
“On-chain markets shouldn’t require traders to compromise between speed and self-custody,” said Matthias Darblade, a Sai contributor. “Sai Perps is designed for active traders who want a clean, CEX-like experience, while still getting the transparency and settlement guarantees that only on-chain infrastructure can provide.”
Why Sai vs. Other Perps DEXs
Sai Perps is built around the premise: trading should be accessible without the usual friction of on-chain perps. Compared to existing perpDEXs, Sai stands out in many ways:
- CEX-like UX, on-chain settlement: A streamlined trading experience designed to be fast and familiar, with trades settling on-chain for transparency and verifiability.
- Infrastructure built for deep, smooth markets: Sai has focused heavily on liquidity, risk systems, and oracle design to support more consistent execution and robust market integrity.
- Accessible to both new and experienced traders: A platform experience optimized for speed and clarity, without sacrificing advanced trading capability.
- Roadmap beyond crypto perps: Sai’s planned expansion includes stocks, commodities, and FX markets, plus user-focused capital efficiency features like Sai Savings (yield on deposits), and cross-chain deposits.
Let’s Go Saicho: $25,000 Trading Competition (Feb 18 – Mar 19, 2026)
Let’s Go Saicho is a one-month competition rewarding trading on Sai across two two-week phases:
- Phase 1 (Feb 18 – Mar 4): PNL Competition | $20,000 prize pool, 50 winners
- Phase 2 (Mar 5 – Mar 19): Be Early (First Come First Serve) | $5,000 prize pool, 50 winners
All markets listed on Sai are eligible in both phases. Traders may go long or short on any listed pair using supported collateral (e.g., USDC and other supported assets such as stNIBI, as available on Sai). For more details on Sai’s Trading Competition, visit here.
About Sai
Sai is a new perpetuals trading platform designed to feel as easy and fast as a centralized exchange, while still settling fully on-chain. Sai’s mission is to make advanced trading accessible without sacrificing transparency or self-custody.
Sai is focused on finalizing its core trading infrastructure and user experience, building liquidity and risk systems for smoother execution, and laying the groundwork for yield features that help users earn on idle collateral. Next on the roadmap: expanded markets (stocks, commodities, FX), Sai Savings, cross-chain deposits, and smart accounts for gasless trading.
SECRET PARTNERSHIP BONUS for CryptoPotato readers: Use this link to register and unlock $1,500 in exclusive BingX Exchange rewards (limited time offer).
The European Central Bank (ECB) is moving closer to a pilot for a digital euro, with Executive Board Member Piero Cipollone outlining plans to begin selecting payment service providers (PSPs) in early 2026, ahead of a 12-month test scheduled for the second half of 2027.
Cipollone on Wednesday held an executive committee meeting of the Italian Banking Association. He said the pilot would involve a limited number of payment service providers, merchants and Eurosystem staff. Selection of participating providers is expected to start in the first quarter of 2026.
Cipollone said the digital euro will be designed to ensure it protects European card schemes and keeps banks at the core of the Eurozone payments system, according to Reuters.
Pilot could give PSPs an early start
European Union-licensed PSPs will be at the core of digital euro distribution, Cipollone said. For participating PSPs, the pilot offers an early-readiness advantage ahead of a potential broader rollout, including hands-on experience with onboarding, settlement and liquidity management.
He added that it also provides clearer visibility on future infrastructure, compliance and staffing costs, helping companies plan investments more accurately.
With direct Eurosystem support and the ability to feed into the design process, participants should gain both operational insight and influence over how the digital euro ultimately takes shape.
Stablecoins are not the only threat to banks, says Cipollone
The digital euro pilot is also intended to protect domestic European payment projects, such as Italy’s Bancomat card network and Spain’s Bizum peer-to-peer system.
“Banks could lose their role in payments not just because of stablecoins but also due to other private solutions,” Cipollone said, pointing to Europe’s heavy reliance on international card networks like Visa and Mastercard.
He added that the digital euro would be structured to preserve the competitiveness of local systems.
“The cap on the fee that merchants will pay on the digital euro network will be lower than what the international payments network, normally the costlier, charge, but higher than what domestic payments scheme, normally the cheapest, charge,” Cipollone said.
Cointelegraph contacted the ECB for comment on the PSP selection but had not received a response by publication.
Related: Lagarde early exit report puts ECB succession and digital euro in focus
The news marks a milestone in the digital euro pilot after the ECB officially moved to the next phase of the project in October 2025, targeting a launch in 2029.
The central bank then projected that a pilot exercise could start in 2027 if legislation is put in place during the course of 2026.
Magazine: Is China hoarding gold so yuan becomes global reserve instead of USD?
The XRP Ledger has activated a new “Permissioned DEX” amendment, a technical upgrade designed to let regulated institutions trade on XRPL without opening markets to everyone.
The change, known as XLS-81, allows the creation of permissioned decentralized exchanges that work like XRPL’s existing built-in DEX, but with a key difference.
A permissioned domain can restrict who is allowed to place offers and who is allowed to accept them, creating a gated trading venue where participation can be tied to compliance requirements such as KYC and AML checks.
Think of it as a ‘members only’ marketplace, while still keeping the trading mechanics native to the ledger.
The feature is aimed at banks, brokers and other firms that may want onchain settlement and liquidity but cannot interact with fully open DeFi markets. For these players, the ability to control access is not optional but forms the minimum requirement.
The activation also adds to a growing set of “institutional DeFi” primitives XRPL has been rolling out this month. Token Escrow, or XLS-85, went live last week, extending XRPL’s native escrow system beyond XRP to all trustline-based tokens and Multi-Purpose Tokens, including stablecoins such as RLUSD and tokenized real-world assets.
Together, the two upgrades create a more complete toolkit for regulated finance on XRPL. Token escrow allows conditional settlement for assets issued on the network, while the permissioned DEX provides a controlled venue for trading them.
That combination is central to use cases like tokenized funds, stablecoin FX rails, and regulated secondary markets for tokenized assets.
While the changes are unlikely to matter to most retail traders day to day, they signal XRPL’s direction. It is building infrastructure for institutions first, even if that means leaning into gated markets rather than the fully open DeFi model that defined the last cycle.
CoinDesk Indices presents its daily market update, highlighting the performance of leaders and laggards in the CoinDesk 20 Index.
The CoinDesk 20 is currently trading at 1962.18, down 0.9% (-18.81) since 4 p.m. ET on Tuesday.
One of the 20 assets is trading higher.
Leaders: CRO (+0.1%) and UNI (-0.3%).
Laggards: APT (-3.0%) and SOL (-2.5%).
The CoinDesk 20 is a broad-based index traded on multiple platforms in several regions globally.
Disclosure: This article does not represent investment advice. The content and materials featured on this page are for educational purposes only.
MYX has completed and closed a strategic funding round led by Consensys ahead of its V2 launch.
Onchain derivatives protocol MYX has completed a strategic funding round led by Consensys, with participation from Consensys Mesh and Systemic Ventures, ahead of the MYX V2 launch. With the closing of this round, Consensys has officially become the largest investor in MYX. The raise supports the rollout of MYX’s Modular Derivative Settlement Engine, marking the platform’s transition into core infrastructure for omnichain derivatives.
MYX V2 represents a structural shift in how onchain derivatives are built and settled. Rather than operating as a vertically integrated dapp, MYX now serves as a modular settlement layer that other products and platforms can build upon.
At the protocol level, MYX V2 integrates account abstraction via EIP-4337 and EIP-7702 alongside Chainlink’s latest permissionless oracle stack. Together, these components are designed to remove long-standing frictions in onchain trading including slow listings for long-tail assets as well as inefficient use of capital and complex transaction flows.
MYX V2 enables gasless, one-click trading while preserving non-custodial control and introduces a Dynamic Margin system that supports up to 50x leverage without relying on traditional order book depth. This architecture allows MYX to offer oracle-anchored pricing that eliminates slippage for large orders, significantly reducing execution risk for professional traders.
By decoupling liquidity depth from execution quality, MYX aims to eliminate the trade-off between access and execution that onchain perps traders deal with every day. MYX states that with this approach, traders no longer need to wait for deep order books, ladder into positions, or eat slippage when trading size, especially in new or volatile markets. Pricing is anchored directly to oracles rather than transient market depth, allowing positions to be opened and closed at predictable prices regardless of local liquidity conditions.
According to the team, the result is materially lower effective trading costs than underlying spot markets, immediate access to newly emerging assets, and consistent execution even during periods of market stress. These mechanics are not discretionary or market-maker dependent; they are enforced by deterministic economic models, robust margin systems, and conservative security assumptions designed to perform under real trading conditions.
Disclosure: This content is provided by a third party. Neither crypto.news nor the author of this article endorses any product mentioned on this page. Users should conduct their own research before taking any action related to the company.
Bitcoin slips ~2% in 7d as MUFG touts stablecoins’ price-stable payments.
Summary
- TC trades near $68k, with a 7d move of about -2.25%, and a 24h range around $66.7k–$69.1k.
- MUFG’s Hardman says stablecoins better meet money’s role via price stability, fast settlement, and low-cost transfers versus BTC’s higher volatility.
- Stablecoins, often fiat-pegged, are gaining attention as digital cash and could see higher adoption in payments while BTC remains mainly a store-of-value asset.
An analyst at Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group has stated that stablecoins represent a more suitable currency option than Bitcoin for payment purposes, according to recent commentary from the Japanese financial institution.
Lee Hardman, an analyst at MUFG, one of Japan’s three largest banks, said stablecoins have attracted increased attention compared to other digital assets due to their function as digital cash.
Hardman stated that stablecoins better fulfill the requirements of money by offering price stability and fast, low-cost payment services, according to the analyst’s assessment. The analyst noted that Bitcoin’s high price volatility limits its use as a daily payment method.
Stablecoins are pegged to fiat currencies and maintain stable value, making them more likely to be used as a medium of exchange and payment, Hardman said.
The comments come as interest in Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies continues to expand globally, with financial institutions increasingly evaluating various digital asset classes for potential use cases.
After the aggressive sell-off toward the $1.8K region, the market has transitioned into choppy consolidation, while lower timeframes are now approaching a decisive breakout point. The key question is whether this compression resolves to the upside or results in continuation within the dominant downtrend structure.
Ethereum Price Analysis: The Daily Chart
On the daily timeframe, Ethereum is exhibiting clear consolidation behaviour following its sharp decline. The price action has become increasingly choppy, reflecting equilibrium between buyers and sellers. Instead of impulsive continuation, the market is printing overlapping candles with limited directional commitment.
This consolidation is confined between the $1.8K static support base and the channel’s midline acting as dynamic resistance. The mid-boundary of the descending channel continues to cap bullish attempts, preventing a structural trend reversal. Meanwhile, the $1.8K zone remains a strong demand area that has repeatedly absorbed selling pressure.
As long as the price remains trapped between these two boundaries, the primary scenario is range-bound fluctuation. A confirmed breakout above the channel’s midline would open the path toward higher resistance zones, while a breakdown below $1.8K would invalidate the equilibrium and likely trigger another impulsive leg lower.
ETH/USDT 4-Hour Chart
Zooming into the 4-hour timeframe, the market structure becomes more compressed. Ethereum has formed a clear triangle pattern, with descending resistance and rising support squeezing the price into a narrow apex. This pattern reflects volatility contraction and typically precedes an expansion phase.
The asset is now approaching the final portion of the triangle, suggesting that a breakout is imminent. Given the recent higher lows inside the pattern and the improving short-term structure, the probability of an upside breakout is increasing. The targets are clearly defined on the chart, with the first resistance zone aligned with the previously marked supply region above the pattern at the $2.4K area.
However, failure to break upward and a decisive breakdown below the ascending support would shift momentum back in favour of sellers.
Sentiment Analysis
The Binance ETH/USDT liquidation heatmap reveals significant liquidity dynamics around the current range. A dense liquidity cluster is positioned above the current price, indicating a concentration of short liquidation levels. Such clusters often act as magnets, drawing the price upward to trigger liquidations before a potential reaction.
At the same time, a developing liquidity concentration below the market reflects the accumulation of long positions. This suggests that traders are increasingly positioning for upside continuation, building long exposure near the consolidation zone.
The interaction between these liquidity pools increases the likelihood of a volatility expansion. A breakout to the upside could trigger short liquidations above the price, accelerating the move. Conversely, a downside sweep could target the long liquidity cluster before a potential rebound.
Overall, Ethereum is in a compression phase. The daily chart reflects equilibrium within a broader downtrend, the 4-hour chart shows a triangle nearing resolution, and liquidity positioning suggests that a decisive breakout move is approaching.
SECRET PARTNERSHIP BONUS for CryptoPotato readers: Use this link to register and unlock $1,500 in exclusive BingX Exchange rewards (limited time offer).
Disclaimer: Information found on CryptoPotato is those of writers quoted. It does not represent the opinions of CryptoPotato on whether to buy, sell, or hold any investments. You are advised to conduct your own research before making any investment decisions. Use provided information at your own risk. See Disclaimer for more information.
About two-thirds of crypto incidents investigated by blockchain analytics company AMLBot in 2025 were driven by social engineering rather than technical exploits, according to a report based on the company’s internal casework.
AMLBot said 65% of the incidents it reviewed last year involved access and response failures, such as compromised devices, weak verification and delayed detection, instead of vulnerabilities in blockchains or smart contracts.
The company said its analysis drew on about 2,500 internal investigations and should not be read as an industry-wide measure of crypto crime, according to a Wednesday report shared with Cointelegraph.
Primary attack vectors included device compromises via chat scams, impersonation scams, and other investment and phishing scams involving social manipulation.
Crypto phishing attacks are social engineering schemes that don’t require hacking code. Instead, attackers share fraudulent links to steal victims’ sensitive information, such as the private keys to crypto wallets.
The findings suggest that security improvements at the protocol level may not be enough to protect users if scammers can bypass safeguards by targeting people directly.
Investment scams and phishing lead by case count
Investment scams accounted for the largest share of cases (25%), followed by phishing attacks (18%) and device compromises (13%), as the most damaging categories in terms of case frequency.
Related: 22 Bitcoin worth $1.5M vanish from Seoul police custody
Pig-butchering scams accounted for 8%, over-the-counter (OTC) fraud for 8%, and chat-based impersonation represented 7%, collectively making up the second tier of the most frequent attacks.
Impersonation linked to $9 million in recent losses
AMLBot traced at least $9 million in stolen digital assets to impersonation-related attacks over the past three months.
Impersonation is the most damaging attack vector in terms of social engineering scams, Slava Demchuk, CEO of AMLBot, told Cointelegraph. “Attackers continue to exploit and trick victims with a ruthless game of charades, posing as trusted entities,” he said. “Sometimes they’re exchange support teams, investment partners, project managers or reps.”
Demchuk urged users not to share private keys or recovery phrases and to be wary of urgent requests involving fund transfers or wallet access, which he said are common entry points for social engineering scams.
Related: Binance confirms employee targeted as three arrested in France break-in
To protect against impersonation attacks, Demchuk urged crypto investors not to share their private keys and recovery phrases.
He also advised investors to ignore “urgent requests involving fund transfers of wallet access,” which are usually the first point of contact for social engineering scams.
CertiK reports January spike in crypto losses
Crypto scams saw an uptick in January, when scammers stole $370 million, the highest monthly figure in 11 months, according to crypto security company CertiK.
$311 million of the total value was attributed to phishing scams, with a particularly damaging social engineering scam costing one victim around $284 million.
Magazine: Meet the onchain crypto detectives fighting crime better than the cops
Dutch Bros delivers ‘record-breaking year’
Brevan Howard’s crypto fund lost 30% in 2025 in worst year since inception: FT
Shia LaBeouf Seen Drinking After Jail Release
-
Sports7 days agoBig Tech enters cricket ecosystem as ICC partners Google ahead of T20 WC | T20 World Cup 2026
-
Video2 days agoBitcoin: We’re Entering The Most Dangerous Phase
-
Tech3 days agoLuxman Enters Its Second Century with the D-100 SACD Player and L-100 Integrated Amplifier
-
Video5 days agoThe Final Warning: XRP Is Entering The Chaos Zone
-
Tech1 day agoThe Music Industry Enters Its Less-Is-More Era
-
Sports1 day agoGB's semi-final hopes hang by thread after loss to Switzerland
-
Crypto World1 day agoCan XRP Price Successfully Register a 33% Breakout Past $2?
-
Business15 hours agoInfosys Limited (INFY) Discusses Tech Transitions and the Unique Aspects of the AI Era Transcript
-
Video1 day agoFinancial Statement Analysis | Complete Chapter Revision in 10 Minutes | Class 12 Board exam 2026
-
Tech6 hours agoRetro Rover: LT6502 Laptop Packs 8-Bit Power On The Go
-
Crypto World5 days agoBhutan’s Bitcoin sales enter third straight week with $6.7M BTC offload
-
Crypto World7 days agoPippin (PIPPIN) Enters Crypto’s Top 100 Club After Soaring 30% in a Day: More Room for Growth?
-
Video6 days agoPrepare: We Are Entering Phase 3 Of The Investing Cycle
-
NewsBeat3 days agoThe strange Cambridgeshire cemetery that forbade church rectors from entering
-
Business6 days agoBarbeques Galore Enters Voluntary Administration
-
Business7 hours agoTesla avoids California suspension after ending ‘autopilot’ marketing
-
Crypto World6 days agoEthereum Price Struggles Below $2,000 Despite Entering Buy Zone
-
NewsBeat3 days agoMan dies after entering floodwater during police pursuit
-
Crypto World5 days agoKalshi enters $9B sports insurance market with new brokerage deal
-
NewsBeat4 days agoUK construction company enters administration, records show