Connect with us

Crypto World

FTX Users Reach Proposed Settlement With Fenwick & West in Fraud Lawsuit

Published

on

FTX Users Reach Proposed Settlement With Fenwick & West in Fraud Lawsuit

Users of the collapsed crypto exchange FTX and Silicon Valley law firm Fenwick & West have reached a proposed settlement in a lawsuit accusing the firm of helping facilitate the fraud that preceded FTX’s downfall.

Key Takeaways:

  • FTX users and Fenwick & West reached a proposed settlement in a lawsuit tied to the exchange’s collapse.
  • The deal, whose terms are undisclosed, is set to be submitted for court approval on Feb. 27.
  • The case is part of broader efforts by users to hold advisers and partners accountable after FTX’s failure.

In a joint filing submitted Friday to a federal court in Florida, Fenwick and lawyers representing FTX users said they intend to formally present the settlement for court approval on Feb. 27.

The filing did not disclose financial terms, but both sides asked the court to pause all pending deadlines and motions while the settlement is finalized.

FTX Collapse Triggers Wave of Lawsuits From Users

Advertisement

The case is part of a broader wave of litigation that followed FTX’s sudden collapse in November 2022, which left millions of customers unable to access their funds.

Users have brought claims against former executives, business partners, promoters and professional service providers tied to the exchange.

The lawsuit against Fenwick was first filed in 2023 and later amended in August.

It alleged that the firm played “a key and crucial role” in the conduct that enabled the FTX fraud, claiming Fenwick provided “substantial assistance” by designing and approving corporate structures that allowed misconduct to continue undetected.

Advertisement

According to the complaint, Fenwick advised FTX on structuring its operations in ways that avoided certain money transmitter registration requirements.

The suit also alleged the firm had visibility into the commingling of customer funds and the blurred operational boundaries between FTX and its sister trading firm, Alameda Research.

Fenwick has consistently denied the allegations. The firm previously sought to dismiss the case, arguing it had no knowledge of any fraud and that it provided routine, lawful legal services to its client.

Advertisement

In November, however, the court rejected Fenwick’s motion to dismiss, allowing the users’ amended complaint to proceed.

The proposed settlement comes after mixed results in users’ efforts to hold outside advisers accountable.

In February 2024, FTX users sued Sullivan & Cromwell, the exchange’s former primary outside counsel, alleging it played a role in the multibillion-dollar fraud.

That case was voluntarily dismissed eight months later, with plaintiffs citing insufficient evidence.

Advertisement

Sam Bankman-Fried Claims FTX Was Never Insolvent

As reported, Bankman-Fried has reignited debate over the FTX collapse, claiming the exchange always had enough assets to fully repay customers.

In a September 30 document, the former CEO argued that the $8 billion shortfall cited during bankruptcy “never left,” and that customer recoveries of up to 143% prove FTX suffered a liquidity crunch—not insolvency.

“There have always been enough assets to repay all customers—in full, in kind—both in November 2022, and today,” he wrote.

Advertisement

Bankman-Fried framed the collapse as a “classic bank run,” triggered by panic withdrawals that drained liquidity within days.

He maintained that FTX and Alameda’s assets exceeded liabilities up to mid-2022, and claimed that financing deals were underway before the bankruptcy filing.

His document disputes the bankruptcy team’s early reports of insolvency and blames their management for eroding value and prolonging creditor repayments.

The post FTX Users Reach Proposed Settlement With Fenwick & West in Fraud Lawsuit appeared first on Cryptonews.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Crypto World

Ethereum Dust Attacks Have Increased Post-Fusaka

Published

on

Ethereum Dust Attacks Have Increased Post-Fusaka

Stablecoin-fueled dusting attacks are now estimated to make up 11% of all Ethereum transactions and 26% of active addresses on an average day, after the Fusaka upgrade made transactions cheaper, according to Coin Metrics. 

Ethereum is now seeing more than 2 million average daily transactions, spiking to almost 2.9 million in mid-January, along with 1.4 million daily active addresses — a 60% increase over prior averages.

The Fusaka upgrade in December made using the network cheaper and easier by improving onchain data handling, reducing the cost of posting information from layer-2 networks back to Ethereum.

Digging through the dust on Ethereum

Coin Metrics said it analyzed over 227 million balance updates for USDC (USDC) and USDt (USDT) on Ethereum from November 2025 through January 2026.

Advertisement

It found that 43% were involved in transfers of less than $1 and 38% were under a single penny — “amounts with insignificant economic purpose other than wallet seeding.”

“The number of addresses holding small ‘dust’ balances, greater than zero but less than 1 native unit, has grown sharply, consistent with millions of wallets receiving tiny poisoning deposits.”

Pre-Fusaka, stablecoin dust accounted for roughly 3 to 5% of Ethereum transactions and 15 to 20% of active addresses, it said. 

“Post-Fusaka, these figures jumped to 10-15% of transactions and 25-35% of active addresses on a typical day, a 2-3x increase.”

However, the remaining 57% of balance updates involved transfers above $1, “suggesting the majority of stablecoin activity remains organic,” Coin Metrics stated.

Median Ethereum transaction size fell sharply after Fusaka. Source: Coin Metrics

Users need to be wary of address poisoning

In January, security researcher Andrey Sergeenkov pointed to a 170% increase in new wallet addresses in the week starting Jan. 12, and also suggested it was linked to a wave of address poisoning attacks taking advantage of low gas fees

These “dusting” attacks typically involve malicious actors sending fractions of a cent worth of a stablecoin from wallet addresses that resemble legitimate ones, duping users into copying the wrong address when making a transaction.

Advertisement

Related: Ethereum activity surge could be linked to dusting attacks: Researcher

Sergeenkov said $740,000 had already been lost to address poisoning attacks. The top attacker sent nearly 3 million dust transfers for just $5,175 in stablecoin costs, according to Coin Metrics.

Dust does not represent genuine economic usage

Coin Metrics reported that approximately 250,000 to 350,000 daily Ethereum addresses are involved in stablecoin dust activity, but the majority of network growth has been genuine.  

“The majority of post-Fusaka growth reflects genuine usage, though dust activity is a factor worth noting when interpreting headline metrics.”

Magazine: DAT panic dumps 73,000 ETH, India’s crypto tax stays: Asia Express

Advertisement