Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Crypto World

Is Model Valid in 2026?

Published

on

Crypto Breaking News

Bitcoin (CRYPTO: BTC) (BTC) has flashed a bottom signal that mirrors a setup from 2023, just ahead of a roughly 130% surge in 2024. Yet the current environment differs in meaningful ways. Liquidity conditions, ETF inflows, and macro data are shaping how the next phase could unfold, suggesting that the path forward may diverge from the last cycle even as the same price-pattern signals draw attention from traders and analysts.

Key takeaways

  • Bitcoin has logged 25 consecutive days in an “extreme high risk” zone, the longest streak on record, a pattern historically associated with late-stage drawdowns or the bottoming phase.
  • Historically, a transition from high risk to lower risk has coincided with the start of a powerful bullish expansion, a thesis echoed by observers examining BTC’s interactions with supply in profit/loss metrics.
  • Trader positioning appears discordant with an immediate uptrend; 30-day apparent demand has alternated between positive and negative, with selling pressure fading but not yet replaced by sustained buying.
  • ETF flow dynamics add to a cautious backdrop: gold ETFs have surpassed spot Bitcoin ETF inflows on a 90-day rolling basis, while Bitcoin funds have posted negative flows over the same horizon.
  • Inflation trends remain a constraint. Headline PCE is near 2.9% year over year, with core around 3.0% and core services considerably higher, signalingPersistent liquidity constraints that complicate a rapid liquidity-driven rally.
  • Price projections for a near-term relief rally suggest a potential push toward the $70,000–$80,000 zone, but several seasoned analysts warn that any such move could meet renewed selling pressure within a broader bearish liquidity regime.

Tickers mentioned: $BTC

Sentiment: Neutral

Market context: The broader crypto environment is being shaped by liquidity dynamics, ETF flows, and macro data that influence risk appetite and the cadence of any recovery in Bitcoin’s price.

Why it matters

The technical signals around Bitcoin’s bottom attempt come at a moment when macro and micro factors are reconfiguring how cycles unfold. The 25-day stretch in an extreme high-risk zone raises questions about whether the market is forming a capitulation-driven trough or merely experiencing a protracted consolidation before buyers return. The interpretation hinges on whether risk-off liquidity persists and whether new inflows can materialize to sustain a move higher.

Advertisement

On-chain and market-to-spot dynamics are diverging in meaningful ways. The BTC price signal that previously helped catalyze a robust expansion has to contend with a backdrop where demand signals off-chain—such as ETF flows and macro liquidity—are not as supportive as they were in the prior rally. The divergence between demand signals and supply-side patterns matters for traders who rely on a confluence of indicators to validate a bottom and confirm upside traction.

Several market observers emphasize that the current regime may not replicate the conditions that preceded the 2024 surge. For instance, a few analysts highlight the role of on-chain supply metrics in bottoming phases, noting that BTC’s interaction with supply held by different market cohorts has historically aligned with pivotal inflection points. Yet the macro environment—with inflation not decisively cooling and liquidity expansions not broad-based—could stretch any relief rally’s durability. This tension between on-chain indicators and macro liquidity creates a nuanced landscape for risk assets and for investors evaluating the risk/reward of new positions.

What to watch next

  • Monitor Bitcoin’s price action around the 45,000 level as a reference point for potential support, with attention to whether downside risk resumes toward historical floors near 30,000 and 16,000.
  • Track ETF and fund flows related to both gold and Bitcoin on a 90-day basis to gauge whether risk-off capital is gravitating toward traditional assets or remaining skeptical of crypto exposure.
  • Watch inflation data releases, including personal consumption expenditures (PCE) and related Fed commentary, to assess whether liquidity conditions remain constrained or begin to loosen modestly.
  • Observe changes in on-chain demand indicators, including the BTC supply in profit/loss and the so-called demand-from-whales metrics, to determine whether buyers are stepping in with conviction or merely testing the bid.
  • Follow macro risk sentiment and regulatory developments that could influence dollar liquidity and the propensity of market participants to reallocate capital into risk assets like cryptocurrencies.

Sources & verification

  • Swissblock: analysis noting Bitcoin’s 25 consecutive days in an extreme high-risk zone and its historical associations with bottoms.
  • Michael van de Poppe (X/Twitter): BTC vs supply in profit/loss chart showing price interaction with bottoming-phase levels.
  • RugaResearch: observations that 30-day apparent demand has oscillated between positive and negative, with selling pressure fading but without a sustained buying surge.
  • Ecoinometrics: notes on inflation trends (PCE near 2.9% YoY, core near 3.0%, core services above 3.4%) and the durability of deflationary or accommodative regimes.
  • Bold.report: ETF flow data indicating gold ETFs have surpassed spot Bitcoin ETF inflows on a 90-day rolling basis, with Bitcoin funds posting negative flows over the same period.
  • Willy Woo: Bitcoin Flow Model commentary highlighting that near-term relief rallies may face selling pressure in a bear-dominated liquidity regime.

Bitcoin’s next inflection point: market structure and macro backdrop

Bitcoin (CRYPTO: BTC) (BTC) now sits at a crossroads where the pattern that preceded the 2024 rally could re-emerge, but only if the macro and liquidity narratives align in a favorable way. The most visible signal is the extended period spent in an extreme high-risk zone—the longest since such measurements began—an indicator that historically cycles through a capitulation move before a durable bottom forms. The question that market participants are asking is whether this time is different enough for supply-demand dynamics to tip in the bulls’ favor without the support of broad-based liquidity growth.

Supportive observations from on-chain analytics insist on a careful distinction between bottoming signals and the sustainability of a new upcycle. The BTC price has often traced major bottoms with a concurrent rebalancing of risk appetite among large holders; this rebalancing can occur even when the broader market weighs macro headwinds. In this context, the BTC price’s interaction with the supply held by different groups—retail, retail-scale whales, and long-term holders—becomes a focal point for predicting whether a new phase of accumulation could take hold.

Yet the market narrative remains cautious. ETF and commodity flows tell a story of a risk-off tilt that sometimes moves capital away from crypto toward traditional stores of value. The outperformance of gold ETFs relative to spot Bitcoin funds over the last quarter underscores a broader investor preference for assets perceived as less volatile or less correlated with the crypto cycle. Inflation remains a factor; headline PCE around 2.9% year over year and core measures near 3% imply that the Federal Reserve’s policy path could keep liquidity conditions constrained for longer than during prior upswings. While a relief rally to the $70,000–$80,000 zone is possible, analysts warn that any such move could confront renewed selling pressure if liquidity does not broaden or if risk sentiment deteriorates again.

Advertisement

From a market-structure standpoint, those observing BTC’s price in relation to supply and demand markers point to two critical thresholds. The first is a near-term resistance cluster that has historically capped upside within bear markets, while the second is a set of longer-term supports near the mid-40,000s and lower, which could preserve the secular downtrend’s integrity if breached. The interaction between price and the “profit/loss” distribution of BTC supply remains a useful lens for anticipating when a bottom may actually give way to a durable move higher, rather than a brief, volatile bounce.

Ultimately, the evolving environment suggests a more nuanced cycle than the one seen in past bull runs. While the bottoming signal is a notable datapoint, the absence of a synchronized, broad-based liquidity recovery means any upside move could be shallow and susceptible to flash selling. Market participants will likely need to weigh the on-chain signals against macro and policy-driven liquidity contours, accepting that the next bullish expansion, if it arrives, may unfold with a slower cadence and with greater sensitivity to inflation data, interest-rate expectations, and regulatory developments.

Risk & affiliate notice: Crypto assets are volatile and capital is at risk. This article may contain affiliate links. Read full disclosure

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Crypto World

Visa Direct Integration Lets OwlTing Users Fund USDC Straight From a Debit Card

Published

on

Visa Direct Integration Lets OwlTing Users Fund USDC Straight From a Debit Card

The integration marks the latest expansion of Visa’s stablecoin infrastructure, which now spans settlement, card spending, and direct on-ramp capabilities.

Nasdaq-listed fintech firm OwlTing Group (OWLS) has expanded its collaboration with Visa to integrate Visa Direct into its OwlPay payment infrastructure, creating a card-to-wallet on-ramp that lets eligible U.S. debit cardholders fund USDC transactions without needing a standalone exchange account.

The capability is now live inside OwlPay Harbor, the company’s enterprise-grade on/off-ramp layer, and is also accessible to consumers through OwlPay Wallet Pro, a self-custody digital wallet. A subsequent phase will bring the on-ramp to OwlPay Cash, the firm’s consumer remittance app.

Once funded, users can spend USDC at U.S. retailers via gift cards, transfer assets to third-party platforms, or send funds globally through settlement channels including pushes to eligible Visa debit cards, local bank accounts via the Circle Payments Network, and cash pickup through MoneyGram.

Advertisement

OwlTing CEO Darren Wang framed the integration as an effort to close the gap between existing card infrastructure and digital dollar rails. The company holds money transmission licenses or equivalents in 41 U.S. states as of March 2026, according to the announcement.

Visa’s Expanding Stablecoin Footprint

The partnership adds another layer to Visa’s rapidly growing stablecoin strategy.

The payments giant launched USDC settlement in the U.S. in December 2025 with Cross River Bank and Lead Bank on Solana, and in March expanded its collaboration with Stripe-owned Bridge to bring stablecoin-linked Visa cards to more than 100 countries. Visa’s stablecoin-linked card spending alone hit a $3.5 billion annualized run rate in late 2025, growing roughly 460% year over year, according to an Artemis report.

This article was written with the assistance of AI workflows. All our stories are curated, edited and fact-checked by a human.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Coinbase CEO Backs US Treasury Secretary‘s Push to pass CLARITY Act

Published

on

Coinbase, Cryptocurrencies, Law, Politics, Congress

Brian Armstrong, the Coinbase CEO who withdrew the crypto exchange’s support for the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act in January, said “it’s time” for the legislation to pass after months of delays.

In a Thursday X post, Armstrong said that Coinbase agreed with comments from US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent in a recent Wall Street Journal op-ed, in which he urged Congress to act on the crypto bill soon. According to the CEO, the current version of the legislation, after months of negotiations between lawmakers and representatives from the crypto and banking industries, was a “strong bill.”

“It’s time to pass the Clarity Act,” said Armstrong.

Coinbase, Cryptocurrencies, Law, Politics, Congress
Source: Brian Armstrong

Armstrong’s endorsement of the bill came about three months after the CEO said that the company could not support the legislation “as written,” leading to lawmakers in the Senate Banking Committee postponing a markup on CLARITY necessary for its approval.

At the time, Armstrong said that he expected the bill to pass “in a few weeks,” but concerns over ethics, tokenized equities, stablecoin yield and other crypto-related issues have stalled progress since January.

Advertisement

Related: Coinbase CEO denies White House clash, says negotiations are ongoing

The expected markup for the bill in the banking committee, not scheduled as of Friday, will follow approval from the Senate Agriculture Committee in January. Both committees need to address different aspects of securities and commodities regulations before a potential vote for the CLARITY Act in the full chamber.

Coinbase legal chief Paul Grewal said last week that lawmakers were “very close to a deal” on the bill.

Is the crypto industry’s influence growing in Washington?

Since before the inauguration of US President Donald Trump, many experts have questioned the influence of the crypto industry on elections, lawmakers’ decisions and White House policies.

Advertisement

Executives at Coinbase and Ripple Labs have been parties to the discussions with administration officials on the CLARITY Act, and Armstrong reportedly met with the president before Trump posted a social media message calling for immediate action on crypto market structure.

The relationships may have benefited Coinbase and other companies seeking crypto-friendly laws and regulations under Trump. Last week, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency approved Coinbase’s application for a national bank trust charter, following December approvals for Paxos, Ripple Labs, BitGo, Circle and Fidelity Digital Assets.

Magazine: Should users be allowed to bet on war and death in prediction markets?

Advertisement