Connect with us

Crypto World

Kevin O’Leary Wins $2.8 Million Defamation Judgment Against BitBoy Crypto

Published

on

Kevin O’Leary Wins $2.8 Million Defamation Judgment Against BitBoy Crypto

Kevin O’Leary just walked away with a $2.8 million courtroom win. The Shark Tank investor secured a default judgment against former crypto influencer Ben Armstrong, better known as BitBoy Crypto.

The funny thing? Armstrong did not even properly defend himself. A federal judge in Florida stepped in and awarded heavy punitive damages after claims surfaced that Armstrong publicly called O’Leary a “murderer.”

  • Judge Beth Bloom awarded O’Leary $2 million in punitive damages plus $750,000 for emotional distress.
  • The court rejected Armstrong’s attempt to blame the default on mental health struggles and incarceration.
  • Armstrong previously taunted O’Leary online, posting his personal phone number and alleging a cover-up regarding a 2019 boat crash.

The Feud Behind Kevin O’Leary Lawsuit

This whole fight traces back to a tragic 2019 boat crash involving O’Leary’s wife, Linda, where two people lost their lives. She was fully acquitted in 2021. Case closed.

Years later, Armstrong went online and ignored that outcome completely. He posted claims saying O’Leary and his wife “murdered a couple and covered it up.” Then it escalated. He shared O’Leary’s private phone number and urged followers to call him, throwing out lines like he was a “rabid dog” going after him.

Advertisement
Source: ALM

At one point, Armstrong even mocked critics by asking, “What are you gonna do, sue me?”

Turns out, that is exactly what happened. And on March 26, 2025, he got his answer in court.

Breaking Down the $2.8 Million Judgment

The ruling included $78,000 for reputational damage and $750,000 for emotional distress.

O’Leary even pointed to increased security measures and changes to studio access because of fears tied to Armstrong’s online following.

Advertisement

Then came the real blow. An extra $2 million in punitive damages, meant to send a message. Armstrong had already defaulted after failing to respond to the lawsuit in 2025. He later tried to undo that default in early 2026, arguing incarceration and mental health struggles kept him from defending himself.

The court did not buy it.

Source: Lastest Appearance For Bitboy

This judgment adds to what has already been a brutal stretch for Armstrong, who was pushed out of the HIT Network and is now staring at serious financial fallout.

The post Kevin O’Leary Wins $2.8 Million Defamation Judgment Against BitBoy Crypto appeared first on Cryptonews.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Crypto World

CFTC Chair Backs Blockchain-Powered Prediction Markets Despite Pushback

Published

on

CFTC Chair Backs Blockchain-Powered Prediction Markets Despite Pushback

US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) Chair Michael Selig has voiced support for prediction markets paired with blockchain technology, claiming they could become powerful tools for discovering truth.

Speaking at the FIA Global Cleared Markets Conference in Boca Raton, Florida, on Monday, Selig argued that prediction markets, also known as event contracts, can provide valuable signals about future events when participants put money behind their views, describing well-functioning markets as “truth machines.”

“When participants express views on future events — and back those views with capital — they create accountability, transparency and information,” Selig said. He added that highly liquid prediction markets often produce signals that the public increasingly sees as more reliable than traditional opinion polls.

“The reality is that prediction market platforms are now viewed by the public as more accurate than political polls,” Selig claimed, pointing to the 2024 US presidential election as an example where market pricing captured the scale of the outcome.

Advertisement

Related: Kalshi sued over Khamenei prediction market ‘death carveout’

US states take legal action against prediction markets

Selig’s backing of prediction markets comes as several US states have taken legal or regulatory action against these platforms, arguing that their event-based contracts resemble unlicensed gambling.

Last week, two US federal court rulings allowed Nevada regulators to continue pursuing legal action against prediction market platforms Polymarket and Kalshi. In February, the state sued Kalshi after the prediction market company lost its court challenge to stop the state’s regulator from taking action over its sports prediction markets.

Selig during the speech. Source: YouTube

Massachusetts has also taken action, filing a lawsuit against Kalshi over sports prediction contracts offered to residents. Meanwhile, Connecticut regulators issued cease-and-desist letters to Kalshi and Robinhood, ordering them to stop offering certain event contracts tied to sports outcomes.

The CFTC chair said the agency plans to provide clearer rules for how event contracts can be listed and traded under the regulator’s framework. He said staff have been directed to draft guidance outlining how these markets should operate while remaining compliant with existing derivatives laws.

Advertisement

Related: Kalshi, Polymarket eye $20B valuations in potential fundraising: WSJ

CFTC chair plans clearer crypto asset classification

Selig also said the CFTC plans to pursue a clearer classification framework for crypto assets and provide guidance on how rules apply to developers of non-custodial software such as digital wallets and decentralized finance applications.