A busy week lies ahead on the United States economic calendar, with labor market and inflation reports due while macroeconomic uncertainty remains elevated.

Crypto markets flatlined over the weekend, as investors licked their wounds following the massive $700 billion rout last week. The following several days could see more volatility with more government shutdown data on the way and a key inflation report.

US President Trump reiterated his 100,000 target for the Dow Jones as US stock futures rose on Monday morning.  Meanwhile, precious metal markets are recovering, with gold reclaiming $5,000 per ounce and silver rising back to $80 per ounce.

Economic Events Feb. 9 to 13

The latest partial US government shutdown has already affected key data releases.  The delayed December Retail Sales data is due on Monday, shedding light on the state of consumer spending.

This is followed by labor market data in the form of the January Jobs Report on Wednesday and Initial Jobless Claims data on Thursday.

“The most important thing, believe it or not, is the Labor Department’s nonfarm payroll report on Wednesday,” said CNBC’s Jim Cramer. “If that comes in soft, it means the Fed can keep cutting rates, and that’s great news for the stock market itself.”

Another big hitter, January’s CPI Inflation report, is due on Friday. The Consumer Price Index measures the average change over time in the prices paid by consumers for a basket of goods and services.

Key Events This Week:

1. December Retail Sales data – Monday

Advertisement

2. January Jobs Report – Wednesday

3. Initial Jobless Claims data – Thursday

4. January Existing Home Sales data – Thursday

5. January CPI Inflation data – Friday

Advertisement

6. 5 Fed speaker events this week

More government…

— The Kobeissi Letter (@KobeissiLetter) February 8, 2026

These labor market and inflation reports are critical in helping investors and Washington understand what is happening in the US economy, and are a key influence on the Federal Reserve’s monetary policy.

You may also like:

“Rate expectations have been remarkably stable over the last couple of weeks,” said Angelo Kourkafas, senior global investment strategist at Edward Jones, as reported by Reuters.

“We’ll see if any either weakness in the labor market data or any surprising cool-down in inflation accelerates a bit the timeline for when the market thinks the next rate cut may be delivered.”

Crypto Market Outlook

Crypto markets barely moved over the weekend, with total capitalization hovering around $2.45 trillion, its lowest level since November 2024. Bitcoin recovered to reclaim $71,000 following its crash to around $60,000 on Friday, but it remains 44% down from its all-time high and in a bear market.

Ether prices reclaimed $2,100 but couldn’t advance any further. The asset remains deep in bear market territory, down 58% from its August all-time high. The alcoins saw a minor bounce, but most of them are still on the floor after being obliterated in last week’s market crash.

Japan’s blockchain endeavours have taken on a more practical tone over the past couple of years, with major institutions now assessing where the technology genuinely fits into day‑to‑day financial and industrial workflows.

Some of the clearest signals are coming from the banking sector. In late 2025, the Japanese government confirmed its support for a project led by the country’s three largest banks to issue stablecoins for payments and settlement, under the oversight of the Financial Services Agency.

It’s a revealing direction. The work is centred on moving money and settling trades, not chasing volatility. That caution comes from experience.

Large Japanese institutions rarely move until they’ve weighed the operational and reputational implications, and blockchain still raises uncomfortable questions on both sides. It offers traceability and clean audit trails, but it also surfaces information in ways many organisations have never had to manage before.

This lands very differently inside a large organisation. On a public chain, transaction details are visible by default, and impossible to contain once they’re recorded. For teams used to controlling how information moves, and who sees what, that challenges long-standing expectations around confidentiality, trust and responsible data handling.

There’s a reason that kind of exposure makes people uneasy. It changes how risk is assessed and whether projects move forward at all.

The Cost of Transparency

Privacy sits at the centre of Japan’s digital strategy, and it draws a clear line around how far institutions are willing to go with blockchain. That sensitivity becomes hard to ignore once projects move beyond pilots and start brushing up against real operations.

On public blockchains, very little stays isolated. A payment here, a settlement there; before long, patterns begin to emerge. Volumes, timing and counterparties can quickly reveal more than the original transaction was meant to convey.

That way of working feels unfamiliar to many Japanese institutions. Banks are used to drawing clear lines between internal data, counterparty information and regulatory disclosure. Manufacturers and logistics firms draw similar lines around supply chains, pricing and sourcing. Public ledgers have a habit of ignoring those lines.

You see it when teams start digging into the data. Traceability and clean audit trails sound great, until someone realises how much of it is visible and how easily it can be analysed. Information that would normally stay inside a business is suddenly far more exposed. And that discomfort is not just cultural; there are strict compliance reasons behind it.

Why Privacy Carries Real Weight in Japan

Anyone building or operating digital systems quickly runs into the Act on the Protection of Personal Information (APPI), Japan’s data protection regime overseen by the Personal Information Protection Commission. It isn’t treated as a box-ticking exercise. It’s the framework organisations use to decide what data can move, where it can go and who remains accountable once it does. 

Act amendments approved in 2020 and fully implemented from 2022, tightened expectations around breach reporting, individual rights and cross-border data handling. Once personal data leaves an internal system, organisations are expected to account for who can see it, how long it remains available and under what conditions it can be shared again.

Those changes pulled Japan much closer to GDPR-style expectations around accountability and data control. That alignment matters for blockchain. Rules designed around deletion rights, correction and purpose limitation sit comfortably with traditional databases, but they sit far less easily alongside immutable records and shared ledgers.

Once data is written on-chain, it is permanently recorded and replicated across multiple participants. That makes limiting access, correcting mistakes or reversing disclosure difficult later on. For teams used to accounting for every hand-off, that takes some getting used to.

The challenge also extends beyond domestic projects. Many blockchain applications operate across Asia-Pacific, where data protection rules vary. For compliance teams, that reality forces architectural decisions much earlier. What goes on-chain, and what stays off it, can determine whether a project ever clears internal review.

Where Builders Get Stuck

If you talk to teams building blockchain systems for institutions, the same issue comes up again and again. Most networks push them toward extremes. Either everything is visible by default, or almost everything is sealed off. There isn’t much middle ground.

That might be workable in early tests but it becomes far harder once regulators, auditors and risk teams get involved. Fully transparent systems expose more than most organisations are comfortable sharing. Fully private systems can make audits and reporting harder to support. 

Teams respond by pushing sensitive logic off-chain or into permissioned environments that feel safer. Extra controls get bolted on. Disclosures are handled as one-offs. Compliance is demonstrated manually when someone asks for it. Over time, logic ends up split between public chains, off-chain databases and closed networks, which slows deployment and makes oversight harder.

You can see the effect in adoption. Consumer use moves ahead. Institutional deployments move more cautiously, even where the interest is clearly there. The promise is obvious, but the foundations still feel underprepared for sustained scrutiny.

Designing for Proof, Not Exposure

This is where the conversation needs to change. Institutions are not trying to publish private or sensitive data. They are trying to demonstrate that certain conditions were met: that a rule was followed, that consent was captured, that access made sense at the time. Looked at this way, the challenge becomes operational rather than philosophical.

You don’t need to put the underlying data out in the open to do that. What matters is having a reliable way to prove those conditions hold.

That’s why selective disclosure and zero-knowledge techniques are appearing in architectures aimed at real-world deployment. They make it possible to demonstrate compliance, eligibility or adherence to policy without dragging entire transaction histories or user records into the open. What gets shared is the conclusion, not every step that led to it. New blockchains like Midnight present such solutions to the industry and various sectors exploring blockchain integration.

For teams used to managing risk, that feels like common sense. Disclosure becomes deliberate. Audits stop feeling like a guessing game. The risk of oversharing drops away. Data protection stops being something to fix later and starts shaping decisions much earlier.

If blockchain is going to move beyond pilots and proofs of concept, that change matters. Systems designed this way don’t ask institutions to rethink how accountability works. They fit into existing expectations instead of fighting them.

Why This Matters Beyond Web3

That approach carries particular weight in markets like Japan, where data handling is taken seriously, and regulatory enforcement leaves little room for ambiguity when expectations are missed. Architectures that make disclosure explicit and limited sit far more comfortably alongside APPI’s emphasis on accountability and purpose limitation. They also travel better across borders, where privacy rules may differ but scrutiny rarely eases.

The implications extend well beyond blockchain. AI systems, data-driven platforms and cross-border digital services face the same pressure as they scale. As the volume of data grows, maintaining trust without losing control becomes harder. Ways of proving compliance without oversharing will matter across the digital economy, not just in Web3.

Japan isn’t trying to slow blockchain down. It’s pushing it to grow up.

Privacy-by-design forces harder choices earlier, but it also clears a path through regulation, risk and trust that institutions can actually walk. For institutions, that’s what adoption looks like in practice. And if blockchain is going to move from promise to something organisations rely on in highly regulated markets, this is the direction it needs to travel.

Solana price is hovering near $85 as falling volume, shrinking open interest, and a weak chart structure keep downside risk in focus.

Solana was trading around $86.02 at press time, down 0.1% over the past 24 hours. The token has struggled to find a footing after a sharp pullback, falling about 13% over the past week and roughly 35% over the last 30 days. From its January 2025 all-time high near $293, SOL is now down close to 70%.

Price action has stayed heavy. While Solana (SOL) briefly pushed higher earlier this month, those gains faded quickly, pushing the token back toward the lower end of its recent seven-day range between $75.76 and $104.98. Buyers have stepped in to provide near support, but follow-through has been limited.

Market activity has continued to slow. Spot trading volume over the past 24 hours fell nearly 36% to $3.72 billion, pointing to fading participation. Futures data shows a similar picture.

According to CoinGlass data, derivatives volume dropped 22.44% to $9.46 billion, while open interest slipped 2.34% to $5.29 billion, suggesting traders are reducing exposure rather than adding new positions.

Risk-off sentiment and leverage unwinds add pressure

Solana’s weakness comes as risk appetite across global markets remains fragile. 

Rising geopolitical tensions and a more hawkish approach by U.S. policymakers have put pressure on high-volatility assets. Known for being a high beta, SOL has been hit more severely than many of its peers. 

Within crypto markets, leverage has been steadily flushed out. Recent sessions have seen liquidity sweeps wipe out billions in long positions, accelerating declines. While Solana’s open interest has occasionally increased alongside negative funding rates, this has more often been due to aggressive short positioning rather than new bullish bets. 

Sentiment has also been impacted by structural issues with the network. The number of validators has fallen by about 70% from its peak to less than 800, which raises concerns about the long-term viability of operations for smaller operators.

Discussions about inflation, value capture, and stake concentration have raised caution, especially as the sector’s memecoin-driven momentum waned.

Solana price technical analysis

On the chart, Solana continues to trade within a clearly defined bearish structure. Price was rejected near the Bollinger mid-band around $108, and the sequence of lower highs remains intact.

SOL is trading below both the 50-day and 100-day moving averages, which continue to slope downward. The $95–$100area has flipped into overhead supply after repeated failures, limiting recovery attempts. 

Instead of a steady base, daily candles have remained near the lower Bollinger Band, indicating ongoing selling pressure.

Momentum indicators are still weak. The daily relative strength index is oversold but lacks a bullish divergence, sitting near 30. Prior dips to comparable RSI levels have produced brief recoveries, but buyers have struggled to sustain follow-through.

The $85 region is serving as short-term support and is in line with a previous demand pocket. A daily close below this level would expose the $80–$75 area next.

To ease downside pressure, Solana would need to reclaim the mid-band and hold above $100, supported by stronger volume, something the market has yet to deliver.

A new report from digital asset manager CoinShares is pushing back on the growing narrative that bitcoin faces an imminent quantum computing crisis, arguing that only a small sliver of supply is realistically at risk in a way that could move markets.

CoinShares is fourth-largest manager of digital asset exchange-traded products globally behind BlackRock, Grayscale, and Fidelity and has a self-reported 34% market share of EMEA. It had over $10 billion in assets under management as of September 2025.

The Saturday report challenged widely cited estimates suggesting that as much as 20% to 50% of all bitcoin could eventually be vulnerable to quantum-enabled key extraction. Those figures, CoinShares said, blur the line between theoretical exposure and coins that could actually be compromised at scale.

CoinShares narrowed its focus to legacy Pay-to-Public-Key (P2PK) addresses, where public keys are permanently visible on-chain and therefore easier targets if quantum computers become capable of reversing them.

The firm estimates about 1.6 million BTC — or roughly 8% of total supply — sits in these older address types.

But CoinShares argued the number of coins large enough to create “appreciable market disruption” if stolen is far smaller: about 10,200 BTC. The remainder, it said, is distributed across more than 32,000 UTXOs averaging around 50 BTC each, making them far less attractive and far more time-consuming to crack even under optimistic assumptions.

The key point is that most of the potentially exposed bitcoin isn’t sitting in a handful of giant, juicy targets. It’s scattered across more than 32,000 separate chunks of coins, and each chunk averages about 50 BTC.

A quantum attacker would have to crack those chunks one by one to steal them, instead of breaking into a single address and walking away with a market-moving haul. That makes the job slower, noisier and less profitable, even if one assumes the attacker has unusually strong quantum hardware.

CoinShares said breaking bitcoin’s cryptography would require fault-tolerant quantum systems roughly 100,000 times more powerful than the largest machines today, placing the threat at least a decade away. Ledger CTO Charles Guillemet, quoted in the report, noted that Google’s Willow is a 105-qubit machine, while key-breaking would require millions of qubits.

Instead, the firm endorsed a gradual transition to post-quantum signatures, framing quantum risk not as an emergency, but as a foreseeable engineering problem bitcoin can absorb over time.

Quantum fears aren’t new for bitcoin, but they’ve been creeping back into market conversations as prices wobble and investors look for structural risks to blame.

In December, CoinDesk reported that most bitcoin developers view quantum computing as a distant, non-issue, arguing machines capable of cracking bitcoin’s cryptography are unlikely to exist for decades.

Critics counter that the real problem is not the timeline, but the lack of visible preparation, especially as governments and major tech firms begin rolling out quantum-resistant systems.

Proposals such as BIP-360 aim to introduce new wallet formats that could allow users to migrate gradually, but the debate has highlighted a growing gap between developers and increasingly institutional capital that wants a clearer long-term plan.

Coinbase has returned to the Super Bowl with a bold, nostalgia-forward spot that eschews hard sells in favor of a shared cultural moment. Four years after its viral QR-code stunt, the exchange leaned into a Backstreet Boys karaoke-inspired concept, letting the lyrics of “Everybody (Backstreet’s Back)” flash across the screen in a one-minute montage. Marketing chief Catherine Ferdon described the creative as a deliberate attempt to spark a communal experience and to illustrate how the crypto community has evolved beyond a niche interest. The move comes as Coinbase seeks to sustain mainstream visibility at a time when crypto brands are navigating a dense regulatory backdrop and mixed public sentiment, rather than relying solely on direct product demonstrations.

The execution centers on text animation and a simple premise: a catchy, universally recognizable tune that listeners can sing along to, with the goal of memory and sharing rather than a traditional call to action. In that sense, the ad mirrors a broader approach in crypto marketing that prioritizes cultural resonance and broad memorability to drive top-of-munnel awareness, rather than relying on flashy product showcases alone. The spot’s design choices—minimal on-screen branding, a familiar chorus, and a single point of reference—signal Coinbase’s intent to let the moment carry the conversation rather than to funnel viewers immediately into signing up or downloading an app.

Coinbase’s 2026 appearance follows a notable high-water mark in 2022, when the company staged a color-shifting QR-code commercial that bounced across the screen and directed viewers to a sign-up link. The campaign, which offered BTC to new users, reportedly crashed Coinbase’s site and drew millions of visits in a matter of minutes, underscoring the game-changing reach of the Super Bowl for crypto marketing. The 2022 effort featured a simple hook and a sense of immediacy—an approach that Coinbase appears to be reinterpreting this year, albeit through a different cultural lens that hinges on shared experience rather than a direct promotional offer.

Key takeaways

• Coinbase returns to the Super Bowl with a one-minute, lyric-driven ad that emphasizes communal experience over a direct product pitch.
• The creative choice leans on nostalgia and a universally known song to foster memorability and discussion among a broad audience.
• The company’s earlier QR-code stunt in 2022, which steered viewers to a Bitcoin (CRYPTO: BTC) signup link, demonstrated the explosive potential of Super Bowl exposure for crypto brands, even as it overwhelmed the site.
• Public reactions online were mixed—some praised the simplicity and recall value, while others criticized the tone or timing amid market volatility and regulatory scrutiny.
• Coinbase executives defended the campaign as a breakthrough moment designed to “break through” in a crowded media landscape and to celebrate the crypto community’s growth.

Tickers mentioned: $BTC, $ETH

Sentiment: Neutral

Market context: The ad lands in a period of heightened attention to crypto brands in mainstream media, where reach and resonance compete with heightened regulatory scrutiny and evolving consumer attitudes toward digital assets. It underscores a trend of brands using high-visibility events to shape narrative and familiarity around crypto, even as market conditions and policy debates continue to influence user acquisition and brand trust.

Why it matters

The Super Bowl spotlight is a rare opportunity for a crypto brand to move beyond technical jargon and reach a broad audience in a single, high-impact moment. By leaning into a communal, sing-along moment, Coinbase aims to embed itself in cultural memory, potentially boosting long-term recognition even among viewers who may not immediately engage in on-chain activity. The choice to foreground lyrics over a product feature suggests a shift toward brand-building as a gateway to eventual product adoption, especially as consumer perception of crypto oscillates between curiosity and caution.

From an investor and builder perspective, the campaign signals that Coinbase is prioritizing media presence and narrative control as part of a diversified strategy to attract new participants to the ecosystem. The reference to past performance—most notably the 2022 QR-code stunt that prompted a flood of sign-ups and traffic—highlights the outsized impact that large-scale media events can have on user interest and platform exposure. In a market where liquidity and risk sentiment swing with macro headlines, such brand visibility can provide a unique form of non-price-driven traction, potentially widening the funnel beyond the usual crypto-native audience.

The ad also intersects with the evolving conversation around crypto advertising itself. As regulators scrutinize marketing claims and risk disclosures, the ability to generate positive topical chatter without triggering regulatory pushback becomes a delicate balancing act. Coinbase’s approach—opening a conversation through a shared cultural moment rather than a direct sign-up prompt—may influence how other players craft campaigns that are memorable yet compliant, especially when targeting mass audiences in the United States and abroad.

Within the content, the emphasis on community and accessibility is reinforced by public commentary from industry figures. An engineer from the Ethereum Foundation noted that many attendees enjoyed singing along and found the moment approachable, illustrating how a crypto-brand moment can resonate with developers and enthusiasts alike. At the same time, critics argued that such campaigns can feel performative or disconnected from the underlying realities of asset risk and regulatory risk, reminding readers that mass-media stunts do not obviate the need for transparent disclosure and responsible messaging.

Coinbase’s leadership echoed that dual message. CEO Brian Armstrong defended the ad on social media, arguing that most people engage with ads in fleeting, buzzed settings and that a distinctive moment is often required to break through. The company’s marketing chief emphasized that the objective was to create a memorable, shareable experience that mirrors the crypto community’s growth. Taken together, these statements reflect a strategic bet: that a well-timed pop-cultural moment can bolster brand familiarity and open doors for deeper engagement as crypto markets and products mature.

Looking ahead, the broader context for Coinbase and similar brands remains nuanced. Mainstream media moments can catalyze new user interest, but they also invite scrutiny about risk disclosure and the real-world implications of crypto ownership. In parallel, the industry will likely watch for how such campaigns influence long-run adoption, whether subsequent campaigns lean into similar cultural cues, and how regulators respond to creative advertising that touches on financial products without overtly directing purchases.

What to watch next

• Monitor Coinbase’s post-campaign metrics: social engagement, traffic spikes, and any uptick in new sign-ups or app activity following the ad.
• Watch for further brand campaigns from Coinbase or rival exchanges that blend pop culture with crypto messaging, testing the balance between reach and regulatory compliance.
• Assess regulatory and policy developments that could influence future advertising strategies for crypto services, including disclosures and consumer protections.
• Track sentiment shifts across social platforms as viewers reflect on the impact of the ad and potential influence on purchasing behavior or sign-up decisions.
• Follow public comments from Coinbase leadership for signals about how the company plans to sustain broad awareness while navigating market cycles and evolving consumer expectations.

Sources & verification

• Official statements from Coinbase marketing chief Catherine Ferdon describing the ad’s intent and experience-driven approach.
• Post by Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong on X defending the campaign’s approach to break through with audiences.
• Historical reference to Coinbase’s 2022 QR-code Super Bowl spot and its reported traffic impact, including the sign-up link associated with Bitcoin (CRYPTO: BTC).
• Public comments from Ethereum Foundation engineer Chase Wright on reactions to the ad in social conversations.
• Media coverage and analysis of online reception, including diverse opinions on the ad’s simplicity, memorability, and timing amid market conditions.

Key figures and next steps

Coinbase’s campaign demonstrates a continued appetite for mass-media engagement as a path to broader crypto familiarity. While the short-term impact on sign-ups or asset prices remains debatable, the larger takeaway is clear: brands are experimenting with entertainment-led formats to connect with diverse audiences, and the crypto sector is not shying away from mainstream stages.

For readers and market participants, the episode underscores the importance of separating hype from fundamentals. A single advertising moment can raise awareness, but sustained growth hinges on clear disclosures, measured risk communication, and a product-and-ecosystem narrative that withstands scrutiny and evolves with user needs.

The Bitcoin price has rebounded nearly 20% after slipping close to $60,000 on February 6. The move has revived “buy-the-dip” hopes and fueled talk of a local bottom. At the same time, US demand indicators have started to recover from recent lows.

But beneath the surface, volume signals, on-chain data, and price structure suggest the rally may be fragile. Several warning patterns now resemble setups that preceded major declines in this cycle.

Bear Flag Shows Big Money Is Not Fully Committed

One of the clearest warning signals comes from the Klinger Oscillator, a volume-based indicator that tracks big money flow.

Sponsored

Sponsored

Unlike indicators such as the CMF, which focus mainly on short-term big-money pressure, the Klinger Oscillator measures large-wallet volume intensity across trends. It is designed to highlight how large players position themselves over time, not just day-to-day activity.

In simple terms, it shows whether big money is quietly accumulating or preparing to sell into rallies.

Between October 6 and January 14, Bitcoin fell from around $126,000 to $97,800, a decline of roughly 22%. During that period, the Klinger Oscillator moved higher while the price weakened. This created a bearish divergence.

That divergence warned that volume strength by large wallets (possibly whales and institutions) was not supporting price recovery. Within weeks, Bitcoin extended its decline toward $60,000 as the Klinger reading dropped sharply (possible big money outflows).

A similar pattern is forming again.

Between February 2 and February 9, the price drifted lower while the Klinger Oscillator trended upward. This suggests large players may be positioning (recent buys) to sell into rebounds rather than build long-term exposure.

At the same time, Bitcoin’s drop from mid-January to early February formed a sharp downside “pole.” The current price bounce movement resembles a bear flag, a pattern that often signals a continuation of the lower trend, with a near 40% crash possibility if the lower trendline support gives way. That could trap the bulls buying into the bounce.

Sponsored

Sponsored

When rising Klinger readings align with a bear flag, it usually means rallies lack deep institutional support. Big players are active, but not in accumulation mode, and might distribute at any given chance. Days of BTC ETF outflows in the near term would validate the Klinger-led hypothesis.

Improving US Demand Has Failed to Mark Bottoms Before

This technical weakness does not exist in isolation. It comes even as US demand has started to improve.

The Coinbase Premium Index tracks whether Bitcoin trades at a premium or discount on US-based Coinbase compared with global exchanges. It primarily reflects American institutional demand.

On February 4, the index fell to around -0.22, showing weak US participation. This level closely matched December 31, 2024, when the index dropped to -0.23. At that time, Bitcoin traded near $93,300.

Sponsored

Sponsored

Want more token insights like this? Sign up for Editor Harsh Notariya’s Daily Crypto Newsletter here.

Many traders believed a bottom had formed. Instead, the price later fell to about $76,200, a decline of nearly 18%.

Since early February, the index has recovered to near -0.07, signaling improving US interest and aligning with the Klinger oscillator’s rising reading. However, history shows that demand recovery often comes before price bottoms, not after. In 2024, US demand improved first. The deeper correction came later.

On-chain data adds another layer of risk.

The 1-day to 1-week holder group, made up of short-term traders, increased its share of supply from about 2.05% to over 3.3% since February 5 (during the 20% rebound). That is a rise of more than 60% in just days, as highlighted by HODL Waves, a metric segregating wallets by time.

This cohort tends to sell quickly when prices weaken. Their growing presence makes the market more unstable. A similar surge in short-term holders in late January was followed by a rapid 3% pullback. So far, improving US demand is being matched by rising speculation, not strong conviction.

Sponsored

Sponsored

Key Bitcoin Price Levels Show Where the Bounce Could Fail

All signals now converge around a few critical Bitcoin price zones.

The first major support sits near $67,350. A daily close below this level could restart selling pressure.

If that breaks, the next downside targets are:

• $60,130, the recent low
• $57,900 (a key Fibonacci support and a mear 18% correction zone from the current levels)
• $53,450 a major retracement zone
• $43,470, the bear flag projection

A move from current levels to $43,400 would represent a further decline of roughly 35%. On the upside, Bitcoin must reclaim $72,330 to stabilize and get out of the possible bull trap. This level capped recent rallies.

Above that, $79,240 remains decisive. Recovering this zone would retrace about half of the prior fall and likely invalidate the bearish structure. Only then would the path toward $97,870 reopen. Until that happens, all Bitcoin price rallies remain vulnerable.

South Korea’s top financial watchdog is stepping up oversight of crypto markets days after a local exchange mistakenly distributed billions of dollars worth of bitcoin to users.

The Financial Supervisory Service said Sunday it will launch planned investigations into “high-risk” practices that undermine market order, including large-scale price manipulation by so-called whales, trading schemes tied to suspended deposits and withdrawals, and coordinated pump tactics fueled by social media misinformation.

The watchdog also said it plans to build tools that automatically extract suspicious trading patterns by the second and minute, alongside text-analysis systems using artificial intelligence to flag potential market abuse.

The announcement follows a widely reported exchange error last week in which some users of Bithumb, among the country’s biggest exchanges, were mistakenly credited with at least 2,000 bitcoin each instead of small promotional rewards, a blunder estimated at roughly $44 billion at the time.

BTC prices dropped 30% compared to the global average at the time, as some recipients tried to sell the assets. The exchange had restricted trading and withdrawals for the 695 affected customers within 35 minutes of the erroneous distribution on Friday.

Regulators said the incident exposed the “vulnerabilities and risks” of virtual assets and signaled they could conduct on-site inspections of exchanges if irregularities are found in internal control systems.

Beyond market manipulation, the FSS said it will introduce punitive fines for IT incidents across the financial sector and raise the security accountability of chief executives and chief information security officers, a shift that could have direct implications for crypto trading platforms.

The agency also confirmed it has set up a preparatory team for the Basic Digital Asset Act, which would expand Korea’s regulatory framework beyond the first phase of crypto rules.

The crackdown plan reflects a broader push by President Lee Jae-myung to stamp out what he has called “cruel financial practices,” with the FSS also outlining measures to strengthen enforcement against fraud and expand tools to combat voice phishing.

South Korean crypto exchange Bithumb said it has recovered nearly all of the Bitcoin mistakenly distributed during a promotional error that briefly disrupted prices on its platform earlier this month.

Bithumb says 99.7% of mistaken BTC has been recovered

In a notice published on its website, Bithumb said the incident stemmed from an internal mistake during a reward event on Feb. 6, when users were meant to receive small incentives denominated in Korean won. Due to a system configuration error, Bitcoin (BTC) was credited instead, prompting some recipients to immediately sell the assets.

The exchange said it has since recovered about 99.7% of the wrongly transferred Bitcoin, adding that the remaining amount was reconciled using Bithumb’s own funds after some users sold the assets during the brief window before the issue was identified.

As of late Feb. 7, the company said all affected balances had been fully restored, and customer assets were safely secured.

Bithumb moved quickly to block impacted accounts and initiate recovery procedures once the error was detected, stressing that the incident was the result of an operational failure rather than a security breach or hacking attempt.

The mistaken distribution briefly caused Bitcoin prices on Bithumb’s BTC/KRW market to plunge, diverging sharply from prices on other global exchanges. The episode highlighted how localized liquidity shocks on major platforms can affect price discovery, even when broader market conditions remain unchanged.

To address user impact, Bithumb said it would compensate traders who sold Bitcoin at unusually low prices during the incident and offer additional measures aimed at restoring confidence, including fee relief.

The exchange also said it has formed a dedicated internal task force to strengthen operational controls and prevent similar errors in the future.

Bithumb emphasized that the recovery of the assets demonstrates the effectiveness of its response systems and reiterated its commitment to safeguarding customer funds following the incident.

After falling to nearly $2.0 trillion last Friday, the total crypto market capitalization has rebounded to above $2.3 trillion. Investors appear to be spotting opportunities, and buy-the-dip sentiment is resurfacing.

The key question is whether this rebound is strong enough to form a classic V-shaped recovery. Several market signals offer insight.

Sponsored

Signs of Buy-the-Dip Behavior After the Panic Sell-Off

One of the earliest and most notable signals is the renewed inflow of stablecoins into centralized exchanges. This trend reversed after months of decline, even though selling pressure remains elevated.

Rising stablecoin balances on exchanges reflect investors’ readiness to deploy capital. This signal is particularly relevant to retail traders, who primarily trade on exchanges.

Data from CryptoQuant shows that the 7-day average value of ERC-20 stablecoins flowing into exchanges on Ethereum increased from $51 billion in late December 2025 to $102 billion as of now.

The $102 billion figure also exceeds the 90-day average of $89 billion. This suggests that capital deployment has accelerated over the past few weeks.

Sponsored

Although selling pressure remains significant, the growth in stablecoin inflows indicates renewed investor interest. Some market participants may already be accumulating positions at perceived market bottoms.

Additionally, the Accumulation Trend Score from Glassnode provides further confirmation. Wallets of all sizes, from small holders to large entities, are shifting toward stronger accumulation.

This indicator measures changes in balance across wallet cohorts and assigns a score between 0 and 1. Higher values indicate more aggressive accumulation behavior.

Glassnode’s chart shows the score moving from yellow and red zones (below 0.5) over the past two months to blue zones (above 0.5) across multiple wallet categories. Wallets holding 10–100 BTC stand out as the most aggressive buyers, with the indicator turning dark blue and approaching 1.

Sponsored

Observations from Lookonchain, an account that tracks notable on-chain activity, further support this data. The account has repeatedly reported whale accumulation in recent periods, not only in Bitcoin but also in Ethereum.

Overall, these signals suggest that buy-the-dip sentiment is returning among both retail investors, as reflected in rising stablecoin inflows, and whales, as reflected in on-chain accumulation. However, a sustainable recovery still depends on the market’s ability to hold key levels in total capitalization.

According to well-known analyst Daan Crypto Trades, TOTAL swept the April 2025 lows, which were associated with tariff-related news, and then closed back above them. He argues that the market must hold above $2.3 trillion in the coming days to justify expectations of a recovery toward $2.8 trillion.

Sponsored

“I think this is an important area for the market to hold if it wants to sustain a further relief bounce,” Daan Crypto Trades said.

He also noted that after several weeks of heightened volatility, market volatility could begin to decline. Price action may then stabilize within a defined range, allowing investors to reassess conditions and search for new opportunities.

Advertisement

A recent analysis from BeInCrypto also highlighted the importance of the $71,000 level for Bitcoin. Only if the price stabilizes above this support level can the market reasonably expect a broader, more extended recovery.

XRP edged higher over the past 24 hours, rising roughly 2% in a modest relief move after last week’s sharp sell-off.

But despite the uptick, the Ripple token’s (XRP) chart indicators suggest the bounce offers little cause for celebration, with sellers still firmly in control of the broader trend.

XRP price holds near $1.45, but broader downtrend remains intact

On the daily chart, XRP remains locked in a clear downtrend, marked by a series of lower highs and lower lows since late January. While price has stabilized near the $1.45 level after briefly dipping toward recent lows, the move appears more like short-term consolidation than the start of a meaningful recovery.

Momentum indicators reinforce that cautious view.

The relative strength index (RSI) is hovering in the mid-30s, well below the neutral 50 mark, indicating bearish momentum remains intact even after the latest bounce. Historically, sustained recoveries tend to coincide with RSI reclaiming neutral territory, something XRP has yet to achieve.

Volume-based indicators also point to continued selling pressure. On-balance volume (OBV) has been trending lower, suggesting that distribution is still outweighing accumulation. This implies that recent green candles may be driven by short covering or temporary relief rather than fresh buying interest.

XRP price faces heavy resistance near $2.05–$2.30 fibonacci zone

From a trend perspective, XRP is trading well below its 20-day simple moving average, currently near $1.68. The downward slope of that moving average underscores the lack of bullish follow-through and signals that rallies are likely to face selling pressure at higher levels.

Fibonacci retracement levels drawn from XRP’s recent swing high to its January low further highlight the challenge for buyers. The $2.05–$2.30 zone, which includes the 0.382, 0.5 and 0.618 retracement levels, represents a dense area of overhead resistance. A sustained move above that range would be needed to shift the short-term outlook more constructively.

Until then, analysts say the latest 2% rise should be viewed in context — as a pause within a broader downtrend rather than a decisive change in direction. With momentum and volume indicators still favoring sellers, XRP’s price action suggests caution remains warranted in the near term.