Connect with us

Crypto World

Sell-Off Slams Treasuries, ETFs & Mining Infrastructure

Published

on

Crypto Breaking News

Crypto’s latest sell-off isn’t just a price story. It’s shaping balance sheets, influencing how spot ETFs behave in stressed markets and altering the way mining infrastructure is used when volatility rises. This week, Ether’s slide has pushed ETH below the $2,200 mark, testing treasury-heavy corporate crypto strategies, while Bitcoin ETFs have handed a new cohort of investors their first sustained taste of downside volatility. At the same time, extreme weather has reminded miners that hash rate remains tethered to grid reliability, and a former crypto miner turned AI operator is illustrating how yesterday’s mining hardware is becoming today’s AI compute backbone.

Key takeaways

  • BitMine Immersion Technologies, led by Tom Lee, is dealing with mounting paper losses on its Ether-heavy treasury as ETH dips and market liquidity tightens, with unrealized losses surpassing $7 billion on a roughly $9.1 billion Ether position that includes the purchase of 40,302 ETH.
  • BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) has seen underwater performance for investors as Bitcoin’s retreat from peak levels deepens, underscoring how quickly ETF exposure can shift from upside to downside in a volatile market.
  • A late-January US winter storm disrupted bitcoin production, highlighting the vulnerability of grid-dependent mining operations. CryptoQuant data show daily output for publicly listed miners fell sharply during the worst of the disruption, then began to rebound as conditions improved.
  • CoreWeave’s transformation from a crypto mining backdrop into AI-focused infrastructure underscores a broader trend: yesterday’s mining hardware and facilities are increasingly repurposed to support AI data centers, a shift reinforced by major financing—Nvidia’s $2 billion equity investment.
  • Taken together, the latest developments illustrate how crypto sell-offs ripple through treasuries, ETFs and the physical infrastructure that underpins the network, prompting a re-evaluation of risk management and asset allocation in the sector.

Tickers mentioned: $BTC, $ETH, $IBIT, $MARA, $HIVE, $HUT

Market context: The drawdown comes as institutional crypto exposure faces a confluence of price volatility, liquidity concerns and cyclical demand for compute capacity. ETF inflows and outflows tend to respond quickly to price moves, while miners’ production patterns reveal how power and weather can shape output in a grid-sensitive ecosystem.

Why it matters

The balance-sheet story around crypto treasuries is front and center again. BitMine’s exposure underscores the risk of anchoring large corporate reserves to volatile assets that can swing meaningfully within a single quarter. When assets sit in the treasury, unrealized losses are a function of mark-to-market moves; they become a real talking point when prices slip and capital-mix decisions come under scrutiny. The company’s $9.1 billion Ether position — including a recent 40,302 ETH purchase — highlights the scale of the risk, especially for a firm that seeks to model ETH performance as a core axis of its treasury strategy.

Advertisement

On the ETF side, investors in the IBIT fund have learned a hard lesson about downside risk in a bear market. The fund, one of BlackRock’s notable crypto vehicles, surged to become a flagship allocation for many buyers before the price retraced. As Bitcoin traded lower, the average investor’s position moved into negative territory, illustrating how quickly ETF performance can diverge from early expectations in an abrupt market reversal.

Weather and energy costs are still a significant constraint for miners. The winter storm that swept across parts of the United States in late January disrupted energy supply and grid stability, forcing miners to reduce or curtail production. CryptoQuant’s tracking of publicly listed miners showed daily Bitcoin output contracting from a typical 70–90 BTC range to roughly 30–40 BTC at the storm’s height, a striking example of how energy grid stress translates into on-chain results. As conditions improved, production resumed, but the episode underscored the vulnerability of hash-rate operations to external shocks beyond price cycles.

The AI compute cycle is reshaping the crypto infrastructure landscape. CoreWeave’s trajectory—from crypto-focused computing to AI data-center support—illustrates a broader redeployment of specialized hardware. As GPUs and other accelerators pivot away from proof-of-work demand, operators like CoreWeave have become a blueprint for repurposing mining-scale footprints to power AI workloads. Nvidia’s reported $2 billion equity investment in CoreWeave adds a regional confidence boost, reinforcing the view that the underlying compute fabric developed during the crypto era is now a critical layer for AI processing and data-intensive workloads.

Altogether, the latest data points outpace simple price narratives. They illuminate how markets, capital structures and infrastructure intersect in a bear environment, revealing both fragility and resilience across different segments of the crypto ecosystem. The convergence of treasuries exposed to ETH, ETF holders re-evaluating allocations, weather-driven production swings, and infrastructure migration toward AI all signal a period of recalibration for investors, builders and miners alike.

Advertisement

What to watch next

  • BitMine’s forthcoming disclosures or earnings updates to gauge whether unrealized Ether losses translate into realized losses or further balance-sheet write-downs.
  • Performance of IBIT as BTC prices stabilize or fall further, and whether new inflows offset earlier drawdowns for long-term holders.
  • Mining sector resilience data, including weekly production numbers and energy-grid reliability metrics, to assess ongoing sensitivity to weather and energy costs.
  • CoreWeave and similar AI-focused infrastructure players’ investment milestones and capacity expansions, particularly any additional financing or partnerships with AI developers.

Sources & verification

  • BitMine Immersion Technologies’ Ether-related balance-sheet disclosures and references to unrealized losses as ETH trades below prior highs.
  • Performance and investor commentary regarding BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) amid BTC price moves and ETF liquidity.
  • CryptoQuant data detailing miner output fluctuations during the US winter storm and the subsequent recovery.
  • Reporting on CoreWeave’s transition from crypto mining to AI infrastructure and Nvidia’s equity investment in the company.

Crypto market stress and the AI-backed data-center shift

Bitcoin (CRYPTO: BTC) and Ether (CRYPTO: ETH) remain the two largest macro anchors in the crypto market, and their price trajectories continue to drive a wide array of spillover effects. The current pullback has placed a spotlight on how corporate treasuries are risk-managed during drawdowns, as well as how ETFs react when underlying assets encounter extended price pressure. BitMine’s Ether-heavy treasury is a case in point: with ETH hovering around the low-$2,000s, unrealized losses have mounted, illustrating the trouble with balance sheets anchored to a single, volatile asset. The company’s substantial Ether position, including a notable addition of 40,302 ETH, points to strategic bets on long-term exposure that, in the near term, translate into large mark-to-market swings. In this environment, even if losses remain unrealized, they shape investor sentiment and the risk calculus behind future capital raises or debt covenants.

The ETF angle adds another dimension to risk transfer. IBIT, the flagship BlackRock product, has exposed investors to Bitcoin price action in a new cycle, and the downturn has drawn attention to the sensitivity of ETF performance to rapid price moves. The fact that the fund’s investors have found themselves underwater — a reminder of how quickly market timing can unravel in a bear phase — underscores the need for robust risk controls around ETF allocations in crypto portfolios. The ETF’s ability to scale rapidly to a substantial asset base is impressive, but downtrends reveal the volatility that sits just beneath the surface of even the most sophisticated products.

Meanwhile, miners faced a concrete operational test in late January as a winter storm swept across the United States. The weather disrupted power delivery and grid operations, forcing several public miners to dial back production. CryptoQuant’s daily output data for major operators tracked a sharp decline from the usual 70–90 BTC per day to roughly 30–40 BTC during the storm’s peak, illustrating how grid stress translates into lower on-chain activity. This temporary slowdown is a reminder that mining is not a purely financial activity; it remains deeply connected to physical infrastructure and regional energy dynamics. As grid conditions improved, production began to rebound, revealing the sector’s capacity to adapt under adverse circumstances.

Against this backdrop, CoreWeave’s pivot from crypto mining to AI infrastructure emphasizes how the compute ecosystem evolves across cycles. The company’s transformation, coupled with Nvidia’s $2 billion investment, reinforces the idea that the compute fabric built during the crypto era has broad relevance for AI workloads and high-performance computing. This shift is not merely tactical—it signals a longer-term trend where hardware and facilities originally designed to support crypto mining become foundational for AI data centers and other compute-intensive applications. For operators, the challenge is to manage this transition smoothly, align financing with new business models, and keep services competitive in an environment where demand for AI-ready infrastructure remains strong.

In sum, the latest market moves illuminate a market in transition: from price-driven narratives to structural ones where balance sheets, ETF dynamics, weather-sensitive operations and AI compute needs converge. The next few quarters will reveal whether this confluence accelerates consolidation, prompts more diversified treasury strategies, or fuels a new wave of infrastructure repurposing across the crypto space and beyond.

Advertisement

https://abs.twimg.com/widgets.js

Risk & affiliate notice: Crypto assets are volatile and capital is at risk. This article may contain affiliate links. Read full disclosure

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Crypto World

Why Is the Crypto Market Up Today?

Published

on

TOTAL Price Analysis.

The total crypto market cap (TOTAL) and Bitcoin (BTC) finally broke free from the bearish curse they had been under for the past 12 days. As BTC neared $70,000, it sparked a rally amongst the altcoins as well, led by XDC Network (XDC).

In the news today:-

Sponsored

Sponsored

Advertisement

The Crypto Market Breaths a Sigh Of Relief

The total crypto market cap rebounded by $211 billion over the past 24 hours, signaling a relief rally after Thursday’s sharp sell-off. The recovery has improved short-term sentiment across digital assets. Closing the week in positive territory could help stabilize markets and support risk appetite through the weekend.

TOTAL is trading near $2.36 trillion at the time of writing, hovering just below the $2.37 trillion resistance. A decisive flip of this level into support would confirm strengthening momentum. Such a move could open the path for a continued advance toward the $2.45 trillion zone.

Want more token insights like this? Sign up for Editor Harsh Notariya’s Daily Crypto Newsletter here.

TOTAL Price Analysis.
TOTAL Price Analysis. Source: TradingView

Downside risk remains if bullish momentum fades. Failure to secure $2.37 trillion in support may trigger renewed selling pressure. Under this scenario, TOTAL could slip below the $2.30 trillion level and fall toward $2.22 trillion, erasing a significant portion of the recent recovery.

Sponsored

Advertisement

Sponsored

Bitcoin Attempts Recovery

Bitcoin is trading near $69,972 at the time of writing as it attempts to reclaim $70,000. This level remains a key psychological threshold for market participants. A successful flip into support would signal renewed buyer confidence and mark the early stages of a broader recovery attempt.

The immediate objective is to secure $70,000 as support and push higher toward $75,000. Achieving this would confirm improving momentum and strengthen bullish structure. If buying pressure persists, Bitcoin could regain traction and set its sights on the $80,000 level in the near term.

Bitcoin Price Analysis
BTC Price Analysis. Source: TradingView

Failure to reclaim $70,000 would weaken the recovery narrative. Renewed selling pressure could drag Bitcoin back toward $65,000 or lower. Such a move would invalidate the bullish thesis, reinforce downside risk, and prolong market uncertainty amid fragile investor sentiment.

XDC Network Jumps Sharply

XDC led the altcoin market, surging 23% over the past 24 hours to trade near $0.0370 at the time of writing. The rally reflects renewed buying interest and improving sentiment. Securing this level of support is critical for sustaining momentum and confirming the strength of the current price move.

Advertisement

XDC is now targeting a move toward $0.0413, but a breakout requires clearing the $0.0392 resistance. Rising inflows and sustained investor participation could provide the needed catalyst. A decisive breach would validate bullish continuation and strengthen confidence in XDC’s short-term recovery trajectory.

XDC Price Analysis
XDC Price Analysis. Source: TradingView

Downside risk remains if support fails to hold. A loss of $0.0370 could push XDC back toward $0.0345. Breaking below that level would expose price to a deeper pullback near $0.0299, erasing much of the recent recovery and weakening the bullish setup.

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Trump-Linked World Liberty Finance Sells 173 WBTC Amid Bitcoin Volatility

Published

on

21Shares Introduces JitoSOL ETP to Offer Staking Rewards via Solana

TLDR:

  • 173 WBTC sold at $67K, totaling $11.75M in USDC during a volatile Bitcoin session. 
  • Initial trades were fast and decisive, signaling structured exits amid price weakness. 
  • Bitcoin dipped to low $60Ks but quickly recovered to $70K, showing market absorption. 
  • WBTC to USDC rotation reflects liquidity preference and defensive risk management strategy.

 

Trump-linked World Liberty Finance sold 173 WBTC near $67K, moving $11.75M into USDC. The trades were fast and decisive, coinciding with Bitcoin’s dip into the low $60Ks. 

Liquidity thinned, stops triggered, but buyers quickly stepped in. Bitcoin rebounded to $70K, showing the market absorbed pressure efficiently. The sale signaled caution, yet strength remained clear.

Timing and Market Mechanics of the WBTC Sale

Trump-linked World Liberty Finance executed 173 WBTC sales on February 5, coinciding with Bitcoin’s decline from the mid-$70Ks to the low-$60Ks. Initially, 40 WBTC were sold for $2.761M USDC, immediately followed by 33 WBTC for $2.276M USDC. 

Both trades occurred within a minute. Consequently, the market saw a clear signal of urgency rather than routine rebalancing.

Advertisement

Later, 100 WBTC were sold for $6.711M USDC as Bitcoin accelerated downward. This final trade appeared as a towering spike on the chart, coinciding with a steep price drop.

Therefore, the sequence indicates that the sales were structured and decisive, creating a liquidity event during volatility.

Moreover, moving from WBTC to USDC demonstrates a defensive approach. USDC preserves value while offering flexibility for future actions. Thus, the strategy prioritizes liquidity over exposure. 

Market participants noted that sales at the $67K level influenced sentiment. Even if independent, the “Trump-linked” label amplified attention, making the timing appear cautious.

In addition, the total volume, while meaningful, is not existential for Bitcoin liquidity. The $11.75M converted into USDC represents a tactical adjustment rather than a complete exit.

Advertisement

Consequently, the trades reinforced short-term bearish momentum but also created opportunities for buyers. The compressed timing, coupled with large trade sizes, allowed other market players to anticipate liquidity points.

Bitcoin’s Reaction and Market Absorption

Following the WBTC sales, Bitcoin briefly dipped into the low $60Ks on February 6. This drop coincided with the heavy USDC conversions. 

As a result, liquidity thinned, stop orders triggered, and weaker traders exited positions. Consequently, the session recorded an emotional low that reflected short-term fear.

However, Bitcoin quickly recovered to $65K and continued a controlled ascent. By evening, the price approached $70K, nearly erasing earlier losses.

Advertisement

Therefore, the market absorbed the $11.75M sell pressure without structural breakdown. This V-shaped rebound indicates strong buying interest.

Furthermore, the transaction demonstrates how tactical exits interact with market depth. Large holders rotated positions, yet equally serious buyers absorbed the coins efficiently.

Consequently, the market interpreted the Trump-linked sales as a liquidity event rather than a persistent sell-off.

As a result, Bitcoin’s quick rebound reinforced confidence in liquidity and market resilience. Finally, the WBTC sale highlights how high-profile players manage risk while maintaining market stability. 

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Crypto PACs Stack Millions Ahead of Midterms

Published

on

Coinbase, Politics, United States, Elections, Donald Trump, Features

Political action committees (PACs) representing the interests of the crypto industry have already secured millions of dollars in funding as the US heads toward its midterm elections.

Super PACs are the uber-rich, no-limits, non-disclosure counterparts to crypto PACs. Last year, the industry spent at least $245 million in campaign contributions alone.

The main super PAC funded by the cryptocurrency industry, Fairshake, raised some $133 million in 2025, bringing its total cash on hand up to over $190 million. Venture capital firm a16z contributed an initial $24 million, while Coinbase and Ripple each donated $25 million.

This influx of cash has alarmed activist and election reform groups. Saurav Ghosh, director of the Campaign Legal Center — a legal center concentrated on voting rights, fair districting and campaign finance reform — told Cointelegraph:

Advertisement

“This kind of influence buying ultimately undermines the democratic process by marginalizing everyday Americans, ensuring that their voices and interests take a backseat to the crypto industry’s deregulatory desires.”

Bipartisan support ensures crypto lobby’s success

The US crypto industry’s main goal is to pass a large framework law, the CLARITY Act, which passed in the House of Representatives this summer and moved on to the Senate. The bill still hasn’t managed to satisfy the crypto industry, particularly Coinbase, nor the ethics and oversight concerns of Senate Democrats.

Now, the CLARITY Act is in limbo, and Congress is shifting its attention to the 2026 midterm elections. For nearly 80 years, the president’s party has almost always lost the midterms, the federal elections in the off-year between presidential elections. This is particularly important for the crypto industry, which enjoys more full-throated support among the Republican Party. Take, for example, the roll call for the Senate’s vote on the GENIUS Act: Nearly twice as many Democrats voted against the motion compared to those in support of it.

Coinbase, Politics, United States, Elections, Donald Trump, Features

Some in the crypto space have taken this to mean they need to take a partisan stance. Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss, founders of the crypto exchange Gemini, have poured millions into the conservative PAC Digital Freedom Fund, which aims to boost pro-crypto and pro-Trump candidates.

Others have stressed the need for bipartisan support, warning that backing one party is bound to backfire once the other eventually takes power.

Representative Sam Liccardo, a crypto-friendly Democrat, told Politico in October 2025, “I don’t think anybody in this town would recommend that an industry put their eggs in one party’s basket.”

Advertisement

One major lobby, Fairshake, has shown it’s more than willing to support Democrats, so long as they are sufficiently pro-crypto. The Super PAC actually spent more money in support of Democrats than it did Republicans from 2023 to 2024, according to Open Secrets.

Whether it be among Republicans or Democrats, the crypto industry’s political strategy has changed significantly both in how much and where it spends its dollars.

How did we get here?

Crypto made headlines in 2024 for donating nearly a quarter of a billion dollars to different political campaigns and super PACs — the largest contribution of any single industry.

But this wasn’t crypto’s first step in the political arena. During the crypto bull run of 2020-2021, crypto companies made massive ad buys. Celebrities like Matt Damon were advertising crypto investment platforms. Now-convicted fraudster Sam Bankman-Fried slapped the name of his now-defunct crypto exchange, FTX, onto the home of the Miami Heat basketball team.

Advertisement

At the same time, crypto increased its lobbying efforts in Washington. Major platforms like Coinbase and fintech developers like Ripple padded their budgets as the industry gained visibility.

Coinbase raised spending from $1.5 million in 2020 to $3.9 million in 2021. Ripple more than tripled the amount it spent on lobbying over the same period, spending $330,000 in 2020 and more than $1.1 million in 2021.

One major donor from the crypto space was Bankman-Fried. He made more than $100 million in political campaign contributions in the 2022 midterms. “He leveraged this influence, in turn, to lobby Congress and regulatory agencies to support legislation and regulation he believed would make it easier for FTX to continue to accept customer deposits and grow,” federal prosecutors said in a later indictment.

By Bankman-Fried’s own admission, he supported campaigns on both sides of the aisle, though he found Republicans “far more reasonable” on crypto.

The crypto market crashed soon after. FTX went bust, the Terra stablecoin system collapsed, and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the US’ main finance regulator under then-Chair Gary Gensler, opened enforcement actions against many crypto companies operating in the US.

Advertisement
American Airlines Arena was renamed FTX Arena in 2021 and has since been changed to Kaseya Center. Source: RoofLogos

Related: SBF always played both sides of the aisle despite new Republican plea

In 2023, the presidential election cycle began. Trump ran against ex-Vice President Kamala Harris. Crypto, for the first time, was on the presidential platform. Trump visited a Bitcoin (BTC) conference and made promises of ending “regulation by enforcement.

Crypto poured money into the race through PACs and super PACs. For the 2024 selections, these were namely:

Fairshake raised a whopping $260 million from 2023 to 2024, at least $92 million of which came from Coinbase. It made $126 million in independent expenditures and transfers to affiliated committees.

Independent expenditures are expenditures “for a communication that expressly advocates the election or defeat of a clearly identified candidate and which is not made in coordination with any candidate or their campaign or political party,” per the FEC.

Advertisement

According to Follow the Crypto, the two other single-issue crypto PACs are affiliated with Fairshake, despite one being liberal and the other conservative. Defend American Jobs made $57 million in independent expenditures, and Protect Progress made $34.5 million over the same 2023-2024 period.

This vast amount of money entering PACs reflects a broader shift in how companies seek political influence.

“Super PACs are increasingly becoming in vogue for special interests who want to make their presence known in Washington,” Michael Beckel, research director of Issue One — a bipartisan political reform organization watching big money in politics — told Cointelegraph.

“Industry-aligned super PACs with huge bank accounts have made a huge splash and helped thwart new regulations on their business interests.”

Just a few years ago, “corporate influence operations focused more on lobbying and direct campaign contributions,” Beckel explained. “Now we’re seeing sector-specific super PACs with massive bank accounts.”

And it’s changing how laws are made in Washington.

Advertisement

Crypto lobby affects policy as Trump seeks to “nationalize” elections

Blockchain bigwigs now regularly visit Washington to meet with lawmakers and advise policymakers on how to regulate the industry.

Issue One vice president of advocacy Alix Fraser said, “The Trump administration is packed with tech industry insiders who have acted in the interest of their own companies — not the American people — to rig policy for their own profit.”

The degree to which the crypto industry is involved in the legislative process is no more apparent than with the market structure bill making its way through the Senate. Work on the bill stalled in mid-January after Coinbase withdrew its support.

The exchange’s CEO, Brian Armstrong, wrote on X:

Advertisement
Source: Brian Armstrong

The main point of contention is a provision that would outlaw one of Coinbase’s products: stablecoin yields for consumers. Banks are pushing to outlaw the practice, saying a flight of deposits from insured lenders could threaten financial stability. The crypto industry and Coinbase argue that the ban stifles innovation and is anti-competitive.

Earlier this week, the White House scheduled a closed-door summit for leaders from the crypto and banking industries to hash out their differences, but according to Reuters, no deal was made.

According to reporter Eleanor Terrett, Senate Democrats said that the talks were “constructive” and were optimistic about the chances of passing a bill. Reporter Sander Lutz said that Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer is “desperate” to get the bill finished, as Fairshake alone now has $193 million in its coffers.

“These payments help explain the crypto industry’s success in curtailing efforts to meaningfully regulate their business model, which is consistent with a well-established practice of wealthy corporate special interests using lobbying and political contributions to influence policy decisions,” Ghosh told Cointelegraph.

“This kind of influence buying ultimately undermines the democratic process by marginalizing everyday Americans, ensuring that their voices and interests take a backseat to the crypto industry’s deregulatory desires.”

Rick Claypool, research director at consumer rights advocacy group Public Citizen, told Cointelegraph that big money from lobbies like crypto pushes out the priorities of most voters from the agenda.

Advertisement

“This feeds cynicism — the sense that our elected officials prioritize the interests of wealthy donors over all other constituents — and erodes faith in our democratic institutions.”

Related: US crypto market structure bill in limbo as industry pulls support

The increased influence of monied interests in Washington comes at a time when election integrity itself is under threat. Trump has recently said Republicans should “nationalize” the midterm elections.

“The Republicans should say, ‘We want to take over. We should take over the voting, the voting in at least many — 15 places … the Republicans ought to nationalize the voting,’” he said.

Advertisement

He added that he will only accept the results if they are “honest,” while claiming that there was widespread voter fraud in many American cities. Election experts have refuted the claims. House Speaker Mike Johnson has admitted that he himself has no evidence of his own claims of voter fraud.

Marc Elias, a partner at Elias Law Group, said that Trump “is not interested in following the Constitution. As we have seen before, he prefers to act by force.”

Crypto is set to increase its influence in Washington as the very elections themselves are at risk of tampering and interference from the highest levels of government.

Magazine: 6 weirdest devices people have used to mine Bitcoin and crypto

Advertisement