Connect with us

Crypto World

Stripe-owned Bridge Bank Gains OCC Conditional National Charter Approval

Published

on

Crypto Breaking News

Bridge, the stablecoin platform owned by payments giant Stripe, has won conditional approval from the US Office of the Comptroller of the Currency to organize as a federally chartered national trust bank. The OCC decision, announced on February 12, would enable Bridge to operate stablecoin products under direct federal oversight once final clearance is granted and custody digital assets, issue stablecoins, and manage reserves within a nationwide banking framework. Bridge described the milestone as a step toward scaling stablecoins with robust governance, noting that the GENIUS Act—signed into law in July 2025—creates a regulatory backdrop in which banks can participate more confidently. The move coincides with Stripe’s 2025 acquisition of Bridge for about $1.1 billion to bolster stablecoin payments.

Key takeaways

  • Bridge has earned conditional approval to organize as a federally chartered national trust bank, placing its stablecoin and custody activities under federal oversight once final clearance is granted.
  • The charter would empower Bridge to custody digital assets, issue stablecoins, and manage stablecoin reserves within a regulated banking framework.
  • Bridge’s move is part of a broader OCC push to license crypto firms as national trust banks, with BitGo, Fidelity Digital Assets, Paxos, Circle, and Ripple cited in related actions.
  • The GENIUS Act’s implications are now central to the conversation, with Bridge describing its compliance framework as “GENIUS ready” as regulators clarify stablecoins, yield, and oversight.
  • The American Bankers Association has urged caution, arguing that GENIUS rules remain unclear and that national charters could be used to bypass existing regulatory oversight, prompting a careful pace in approvals.
  • Policy discussions in the White House and in Congress continue to weigh stablecoin yield and the broader digital-asset market structure, potentially shaping how chartered institutions interact with tokenized assets and investor protections.

Market context: The OCC’s latest action comes as the broader push for regulated stablecoin rails gains momentum and lawmakers pursue a comprehensive digital asset framework in the Senate. With the GENIUS Act guiding how federal charters apply to crypto services, the market is watching closely for clarity on yield, custody, and interoperability across regulated banks and crypto platforms. The development signals a potential shift toward more formalized on-ramps for institutions seeking stablecoin-based payments and settlements.

Why it matters

For users and developers, a federally chartered national trust bank could offer stronger consumer protections, clearer governance, and the potential for more scalable, regulated stablecoin services. A formal federal framework may reduce counterparty risk and improve liquidity for on-chain payments that depend on stablecoins for settlement and cross-border remittances, creating a more predictable environment for builders and merchants integrating digital assets into payments rails.

For issuers and platforms, obtaining a national charter could streamline governance, custody, and treasury operations, enabling broader product offerings at scale. Yet regulatory clarity remains a work in progress, particularly as GENIUS Act rules are implemented and interpreted, leaving room for ongoing debate over how stablecoins fit within the broader financial system and how yield incentives align with investor protections.

From a market perspective, regulated rails could attract traditional finance participants into the crypto ecosystem, potentially boosting liquidity and interoperability while concentrating influence among a handful of chartered institutions. The balance between robust oversight and fostering innovation will shape how quickly these rails expand and how risk is managed across custody providers, issuers, and banks working on crypto-native products.

Advertisement

What to watch next

  • Final OCC approval for Bridge’s national trust bank charter and any accompanying compliance conditions.
  • Regulatory clarifications around the GENIUS Act, including timelines for implementing rules affecting stablecoins and tokenized assets.
  • Updates on other charter applications (Circle, Ripple, BitGo, Fidelity, Paxos) and their progress through the OCC process.
  • Any Congressional or White House developments on the digital asset market structure framework and stablecoin yield policy.
  • Stripe’s follow-on steps to integrate Bridge’s charter with its broader payments ecosystem and stablecoin issuance plans.

Sources & verification

  • Bridge announces conditional OCC approval to organize a federally chartered national trust bank (Bridge blog post).
  • OCC CAAS filing details Bridge’s application and approval on February 12 for a national bank charter.
  • Stripe’s 2025 acquisition of Bridge for approximately $1.1 billion to support stablecoin payments.
  • American Bankers Association letter urging OCC to slow crypto trust charter approvals and seek GENIUS Act clarity.
  • White House discussions with crypto and banking industry representatives on stablecoin yield and the market-structure framework.

Bridge advances toward a federally chartered stablecoin backbone under GENIUS Act

Bridge’s path to a federally chartered national trust bank represents a notable milestone in the evolving architecture of crypto rails in the United States. The OCC’s conditional blessing—arrived at a moment when several crypto firms are pursuing national trust bank charters—signals a shift from state-level trust status to a federally supervised framework. Bridge’s core business—custody of digital assets, stablecoin issuance, and reserve management—appears poised to move under the OCC’s direct oversight, subject to final approval conditions that would iron out governance, risk controls, and capital requirements. Bridge did not merely seek a license; it framed the move as an alignment with a broader regulatory philosophy spawned by GENIUS Act provisions, which aim to give regulated banks and crypto platforms clearer boundaries and predictable accountability in a rapidly changing landscape.

In a public post outlining the significance of the milestone, Bridge highlighted its commitment to a “GENIUS-ready” posture. The firm argued that a national trust bank charter would provide customers with a robust regulatory backbone, enabling them to build and scale stablecoin-enabled services with greater confidence. Bridge’s stance gains resonance in an ecosystem where stablecoins have become a fundamental component of daily settlement, cross-border payments, and DeFi liquidity flows. The company’s assertion that federal oversight can coexist with innovation reflects a broader assumption in the sector: when properly structured, regulated rails reduce systemic risk and lay the groundwork for responsible growth.

Context matters: Bridge’s bid comes amid a wave of OCC activity aimed at formalizing crypto banking services. Earlier in the year, regulators conditionally approved BitGo, Fidelity Digital Assets, and Paxos to convert state-level trust charters into national ones, while Circle and Ripple were also cited as pursuing national bank charters. The development underscores a shared regulatory objective—provide credible, centralized supervision for digital-asset activities that involve custody, settlement, and stablecoin issuance—without stifling technological progress. The OCC’s caution around GENIUS rule clarity, voiced by the American Bankers Association, reflects a healthy insistence on transparent standards before broad approvals, ensuring that national charters do not create loopholes that circumvent existing oversight or risk controls.

Bridge’s news sits within a larger policy milieu shaped by ongoing Senate deliberations on a comprehensive digital asset market structure framework. In parallel, White House officials have continued to meet with representatives from the crypto and banking sectors to discuss stablecoin yields and related conflicts of interest, highlighting the administration’s interest in aligning economic incentives with consumer protections. As policymakers weigh the balance between innovation and risk management, the question remains: will GENIUS Act guidance crystallize quickly enough to catalyze a new class of federally regulated crypto rails, or will regulatory ambiguity slow the pace of charter grants? The answer will influence how institutions, investors, and developers navigate the next wave of stablecoin adoption and institutional custody solutions.

Bridge’s forthcoming steps—whether that entails final OCC certification, the refinement of risk-management policies, or integration with Stripe’s wider payments infrastructure—will be closely watched by market participants seeking predictable regulatory footing for stablecoins and on-chain settlement. For many in the industry, the news signals a disciplined shift toward formalized governance and oversight that could unlock new levels of scale and reliability in digital-asset services. Yet the path remains contingent on regulatory clarifications, the pace of approvals for other charter applicants, and the evolution of how stablecoins are treated within the broader financial system. As the year unfolds, the OCC’s decisions and legislative updates will likely shape the contours of crypto banking for the foreseeable future.

Advertisement

Risk & affiliate notice: Crypto assets are volatile and capital is at risk. This article may contain affiliate links. Read full disclosure

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Crypto World

XRP Ledger nears BNB Chain in tokenized RWA rankings

Published

on

XRP Ledger faces test as tokenized Treasuries sit idle on XRPL

The XRP Ledger has climbed to sixth place among blockchain networks by tokenized real-world asset value, surpassing Solana and approaching BNB Chain, according to the latest RWA league table data.

Summary

  • The XRP ledger added $354 million in tokenized assets over the past 30 days.
  • It currently ranks behind BNB Chain in total tokenized assets.
  • If the current rate of RWA issuance continues, the ledger could challenge BNB Chain’s position among leading tokenization networks.

The ledger added $354 million in tokenized assets over the past 30 days, according to ETHNews. The growth occurred despite downward pressure on XRP’s market price during the period.

The network’s total RWA value, excluding stablecoins and combining distributed and represented assets, now exceeds that of Solana, which holds a slightly lower total in tokenized RWAs, according to the data.

Advertisement

The XRP Ledger currently ranks behind BNB Chain in total tokenized assets. The network would need to add additional tokenized value to overtake BNB Chain and secure fifth position globally, according to the rankings.

The increase in tokenized asset value on the XRP Ledger occurred while the token’s price declined during the broader market downturn. The divergence between price performance and on-chain asset growth indicates infrastructure development on the network, the report stated.

If the current rate of RWA issuance continues, the ledger could challenge BNB Chain’s position among leading tokenization networks, according to the analysis.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

CFTC’s Selig opens legal dispute against states getting in way of prediction markets

Published

on

CFTC's Selig opens legal dispute against states getting in way of prediction markets

The legal challenges from state governments against certain aspects of prediction markets such as Polymarket and Kalshi received a sharp rebuke from U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission Chairman Mike Selig, who is arguing that his federal agency has jurisdiction — not the states.

“To those who seek to challenge our authority in this space, let me be clear, we will see you in court,” Selig said in a video statement posted Tuesday on social media site X. He said his agency filed a legal brief in court to back up the federal role as the leading regulator over this corner of the derivatives markets.

“The CFTC has regulated these markets for over two decades,” he said. “They provide useful functions for society by allowing everyday Americans to hedge commercial risks like increases in temperature and energy price spikes, they also serve as an important check on our news media and our information streams.”

Selig did not mention sports bets in his list of examples, though that’s where many of the legal disputes are focused. States have gone after event-contract platforms with accusations they’ve breached sports-betting laws at the state level, such as in Nevada, Massachusetts and New York. A federal judge in Nevada concluded in November that the state authorities were correct and that the contracts aren’t properly the business of the CFTC, though that ruling is under appeal.

Advertisement

Coinbase, the top U.S. crypto exchange, has also sought to enter the prediction markets sector, and it’s currently suing Connecticut, Illinois and Michigan over those states’ attempts to regulate sports betting as gaming.

That’s the setting that Selig is weighing into as he declares “exclusive jurisdiction over these derivative markets.” But until the return to Washington of President Donald Trump, the agency had fought against these companies and some of their contracts, claiming that the sites’ political bets were unlawful and “contrary to the public interest.” But courts had gone against the CFTC in its legal fight with Kalshi, and when Trump’s administration overhauled the agency’s leadership, the fight was abandoned.

In early 2025, the president’s son, Don Trump Jr., joined Kalshi as a strategic adviser. In August, he then joined Polymarket’s advisory board.

In October, Trump Media & Technology Group (DJT), which owns President Donald Trump’s social platform Truth Social, said it was getting into the prediction markets business.

Advertisement

Within weeks of his confirmation by the Senate, Trump nominee Selig said that his agency was resetting its prediction markets approach and would pursue new policies on that front. He said the CFTC “will advance a new rulemaking grounded in a rational and coherent interpretation of the Commodity Exchange Act that promotes responsible innovation in our derivatives markets in line with Congressional intent.”

In the hours after Selig’s Tuesday statement, Utah Governor Spencer Cox responded with his own challenge.

“Mike, I appreciate you attempting this with a straight face, but I don’t remember the CFTC having authority over the ‘derivative market’ of LeBron James rebounds,” he wrote in a response on X. “These prediction markets you are breathlessly defending are gambling — pure and simple. They are destroying the lives of families and countless Americans, especially young men. They have no place in Utah.”

While Utah hasn’t been among states leading legal challenges against the prediction markets, there is a legislative effort there that seeks to target certain sports contracts. Cox advised Selig he’d use every power to “beat you in court.”

Advertisement

And U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren, the ranking Democrat on the Senate Banking Committee, argued that Selig is undermining state powers.

“President Trump’s CFTC Chair is trying to strip states of their authority to regulate gambling within their borders and hamstring their ability to protect Americans from getting ripped off,” she said in a statement. “The CFTC should focus on ensuring our derivatives markets don’t blow up the economy again, not helping corrupt political insiders cash in.”

UPDATE (February 17, 2026, 17:59 UTC): Adds response from Utah governor.
UPDATE (February 17, 2026, 21:30 UTC): Adds statement from Senator Warren.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

David Bailey-led company acquiring related firms

Published

on

David Bailey-led company acquiring related firms

Nakamoto (NAKA) has signed definitive agreements to acquire media and events firm BTC Inc and asset management firm UTXO Management.

The all-stock deal is — NAKA will issue 363. million shares for the purchase — is valued at approximately $107.3 million and expected to close in the first quarter of 2026, according to a Tuesday press release.

BTC Inc runs several high-profile bitcoin media properties, including Bitcoin Magazine, The Bitcoin Conference, and the enterprise-focused Bitcoin for Corporations program. UTXO, meanwhile, advises 210k Capital, a hedge fund allocating capital into bitcoin-related public and private markets.

“We intend to operate a portfolio of companies across media, asset management, and advisory services that can scale with Bitcoin’s long-term growth,” said David Bailey, CEO of Nakamoto. “This transaction signifies the first step of the company we intend to build, and we’re just getting started.”

Advertisement

The transaction has raised eyebrows among some market watchers due to the steep discount between the original pricing and the current execution. One user on X pointed out that Nakamoto was originally set to pay over $400 million based on the agreed $1.12 share price, but with the stock now trading below 30 cents, the acquisition is closing at roughly $107 million.

Bailey, who also leads BTC Inc, is central to all three companies involved, making this a related-party transaction. A special committee of independent directors approved the deal with input from outside legal and financial advisers.

NAKA shares are flat on Tuesday, trading at just $0.30 versus the roughly $2.00 level prior to converting to a bitcoin treasury strategy (when the company was named Kindly MD).

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Bitcoin’s Derivatives Crash: The Hidden Force Stalling Price Recovery

Published

on

Nexo Partners with Bakkt for US Crypto Exchange and Yield Programs

TLDR:

  • Bitcoin open interest peaked at 381,000 BTC across all exchanges during the October 2025 cycle top.
  • Binance recorded a 20.8% open interest drop between October 6 and 11, with Bybit and Gate.io falling 37%.
  • Post-peak declines have persisted monthly, with Binance down an additional 39.3% since the market top.
  • Shrinking derivatives exposure signals active risk reduction, making a sustained Bitcoin rally difficult.

 

Bitcoin’s price recovery has stalled, and the derivatives market may hold the answer. Open interest data across major exchanges shows a sustained and deepening contraction since the latest cycle peak.

Speculative activity that once fueled Bitcoin’s climb has now reversed course entirely. The data suggests that the collapse in derivatives positioning is playing a central role in keeping Bitcoin’s price under pressure.

A Record Build-Up Followed by a Sharp Collapse

Bitcoin’s derivatives market expanded aggressively throughout this cycle. On Binance, Bitcoin-denominated open interest peaked at 120,000 BTC in October 2025, compared to 94,300 BTC after the November 2021 high. That growth reflected an enormous build-up in speculative exposure heading into the cycle top.

Across all exchanges combined, open interest reached 381,000 BTC at the peak, up from 221,000 BTC in April 2024.

Advertisement

Analyst Darkfost noted on X that “speculation during this cycle reached unprecedented levels, and both novice and professional investors have paid the price.”

The unwind began swiftly after the October sell-off. Between October 6 and October 11 alone, Binance recorded a 20.8% drop in open interest. Bybit and Gate.io saw even steeper declines of 37% each during that same five-day window.

That rapid contraction removed a large volume of leveraged positioning from the market. Without that speculative support, Bitcoin lost a key structural driver that had been pushing prices higher throughout the cycle.

Why the Derivatives Slump Keeps Price Recovery Out of Reach

The contraction has not stopped at that initial sell-off. Since then, declines have continued in nearly every subsequent month across major platforms. Binance has fallen an additional 39.3%, while Bybit is down 33% and BitMEX has dropped 24%.

Advertisement

Darkfost pointed out that the derivatives market “was definitely a primary driver during this cycle, but it has also become a key force behind the decline.” As open interest shrinks, so does the fuel needed to sustain upward price momentum.

Traders are either voluntarily reducing exposure or being forced out through liquidations. Either way, the result is the same; fewer active positions mean less buying pressure and thinner market participation overall.

Under these conditions, any price rally lacks the depth to hold. Without a meaningful recovery in open interest, Bitcoin remains vulnerable to further selling pressure.

Derivatives data continues to serve as one of the clearest indicators of where market sentiment truly stands.

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

The crypto tax reckoning is here

Published

on

The crypto tax reckoning is here

Doing crypto taxes this year is going to suck.

For the past decade, the IRS has treated cryptocurrency as property rather than currency, treating every sale and exchange as a taxable event. However, despite blockchains being public ledgers, tax compliance rates have always been low. The gap between what the IRS expects and what crypto users actually pay in taxes has been growing for years.

That gap is about to close significantly.

We are entering the crypto tax ‘enforcement era’

The shift didn’t happen overnight. In 2021, the IRS launched Operation Hidden Treasure to target deliberate concealment of crypto income. By 2022, it had hired agents with specialized blockchain expertise and secured court orders for data from major exchanges, including Coinbase. The message was clear: the era of lax enforcement was ending.

Advertisement

Now, in 2026, we’re seeing authorities take this a significant step further. This marks what I’d call the beginning of the end for crypto tax avoidance, not just in the US, but worldwide.

Forty-eight countries, including the U.S., U.K., EU members and Brazil, have agreed to implement the OECD’s Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework (CARF). All crypto-asset service providers must now report user transaction data to authorities. In the U.K., HMRC recently issued 650,000 nudge letters to crypto investors who owed tax, a 134% increase compared to last year.

In the U.S., the shift is even more concrete. For the first time, cryptocurrency exchanges will issue Form 1099-DA, a new document that declares your cost basis and proceeds directly to the IRS. It’s similar to the 1099-B used for stocks, and brokers had to issue them by February 17, 2026, covering all sales and exchanges from 2025. From the 2026 tax year onward, brokers will also report cost basis, giving the IRS an unprecedented view of investor gains and losses.

This represents a fundamental shift from self-disclosure to automatic reporting. The IRS can now easily compare what brokers report with what taxpayers file, making errors, omissions and under-reporting easier to detect.

Advertisement

I keep seeing crypto investors on X and Reddit saying the government will eventually remove taxes on crypto. They won’t. Users need to stop waiting for that to happen.

The Problem: rules are written by people who don’t use crypto

The Form 1099-DA was clearly drafted by legislators who know nothing about crypto, which is unfortunate.

These regulations treat cryptocurrency like stocks, but crypto behaves nothing like stocks. Real crypto users don’t just buy and hold on Coinbase. They move assets between multiple wallets, bridge across chains, interact with DeFi protocols, provide liquidity, stake tokens and use complex trading strategies across dozens of platforms. Many of these activities involve transactions outside centralized exchanges. This is where the new reporting framework falls short.

The new rules are going to be a real burden for anyone who uses crypto the way it was designed to be used. That’s a problem that goes beyond mere annoyance for individuals and will have significant repercussions for the industry as a whole.

Advertisement

If interacting with DeFi creates a huge tax compliance problem, fewer people will use it. If moving assets to self-custody means drowning in paperwork, people will leave their funds on exchanges. Though these regulations were inevitable and well-intentioned, they risk pushing users back to centralized systems that crypto was meant to replace.

The real headaches are just beginning

I spend a lot of time engaging with the crypto community online, and I’ve seen countless users try to file their taxes manually, hit a wall and then give up.

If you haven’t filed crypto taxes in the past, now is the time. We have users constantly messaging us, needing to file multiple past years. I’ve even seen investors trying to report on four or more tax years at once. They’ve probably never filed before, and now they’re scrambling because they know enforcement is ramping up.

The trick is to pull your records constantly, not just during tax season. Many trading platforms delete historical data after a certain period, but the IRS sees large flows when you offramp and wants to know where that money originated. Without those trading records, you can’t prove your cost basis or show losses.

Advertisement

What’s next for crypto tax reporting?

It’s clear we’re entering a new phase of crypto tax reporting. It’s shifting from being a vague, regulatory gray area to transparency and much tighter enforcement.

The crypto industry needs to adapt to this reality now, rather than fight or ignore it. The message for investors is clear –get compliant now. Gather documentation for all purchases, sales and transfers across wallets and exchanges. The longer you wait, the harder it’s going to be.

The challenge for the crypto industry is different: we need to continue developing tools that are agile and can adapt to the fast pace at which enforcement is introducing these rules. Ultimately, we need to make tax reporting as easy as possible for investors, so the industry can continue to thrive.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

HIVE Revenue Jumps 219% as AI Expansion Offsets Bitcoin Price Weakness

Published

on

HIVE Revenue Jumps 219% as AI Expansion Offsets Bitcoin Price Weakness

HIVE Digital Technologies delivered a record fiscal third quarter despite weaker Bitcoin prices, suggesting that its expansion into artificial intelligence and high-performance computing is offsetting broader crypto-market headwinds.

For the quarter ended Dec. 31, 2025, HIVE reported $93.1 million in revenue, a 219% increase from a year earlier. Gross operating margin expanded more than sixfold year over year to $32.1 million, representing about 35% of revenue.

The strong performance came even as Bitcoin (BTC) prices declined about 10% during the quarter and network difficulty rose about 15%, conditions that have pressured mining margins across the industry following the 2024 halving.

HIVE generated 885 Bitcoin during the period, a 23% quarter-on-quarter increase, while scaling its installed hashrate to 25 exahashes per second (EH/s).

Advertisement

Beyond mining, the company continues to build out its AI and high-performance computing (HPC) business. In February, HIVE signed a two-year, $30 million contract to deploy 504 Nvidia B200 GPUs for enterprise AI cloud services.

The deal is expected to add about $15 million in annual recurring revenue and lift HIVE’s HPC annualized revenue run rate by about 75%.

The company is targeting $140 million in annual recurring AI cloud revenue by the fourth quarter of 2026, as part of a broader plan to scale total HPC revenue to $225 million as it expands GPU cloud and colocation capacity.

HIVE Digital’s stock was down more than 2% on Tuesday. Source: Yahoo Finance

Related: Bitcoin mining’s 2026 reckoning: AI pivots, margin pressure and a fight to survive

HIVE’s expansion beyond Bitcoin mining gains traction

HIVE was among the early publicly listed Bitcoin miners, but it began pivoting toward HPC infrastructure several years ago as management anticipated increasing competition and margin compression in the mining sector.

Advertisement

That diversification has become increasingly relevant. Mining profitability deteriorated sharply after the 2024 halving reduced block rewards, while rising network difficulty and volatile Bitcoin prices added further pressure. The environment intensified after Bitcoin retraced from its October 2025 highs, forcing many miners to reassess capital allocation and infrastructure strategy.

HIVE’s “dual-engine” model, using Bitcoin mining as a cash-flow generator while building recurring AI and HPC revenue, reflects a broader shift among publicly traded miners seeking stability beyond Bitcoin’s price cycles.

Source: Joe Nakamoto

Several other Bitcoin miners, including IREN and TeraWulf, have shifted toward AI workloads, reflecting a growing view among analysts that the next infrastructure “supercycle” will be powered by artificial intelligence rather than crypto.

Related: Paradigm reframes Bitcoin mining as grid asset, not energy drain