Connect with us

Crypto World

Trader Leaves Crypto Forever After Losing $10,000 in LIBRA

Published

on

Trader Leaves Crypto Forever After Losing $10,000 in LIBRA

One year has passed since Argentine President Javier Milei backed a project that drove hundreds of thousands of people worldwide to invest in Libra, a meme coin that turned out to be a rug pull.

Alfonso Gamboa Silvestre, a 25-year-old from Chile, was among the many traders who suffered steep losses. The token’s launch and swift demise cost him $10,000. Since that moment, he has left the crypto industry for good. 

A Presidential Endorsement That Drove a Buying Frenzy

On Valentine’s Day last year, Gamboa Silvestre was trading on his computer. The day seemed normal until a notification popped up on his phone from one of the many crypto groups he had on Telegram. 

Advertisement

He opened the message, which read something along the lines of “Argentina’s president just launched a crypto token.” Gamboa Silvestre ran to X (formerly Twitter) to see whether it was true. 

At first, he thought Milei’s account had been hacked. But after carefully reading the president’s verified tweet and the “Viva La Libertad Project” website he included, Gamboa Silvestre ruled out the possibility. 

So he bought the token. In total, he invested $5,000.

“I made two purchases. First, a smaller one. When I was totally sure it was [Milei’s] tweet, I made a bigger one,” Gamboa Silvestre told BeInCrypto in an interview in Spanish. 

After that, Gamboa Silvestre left the house to go out to dinner with his family, but he couldn’t keep his eyes off his phone. Libra’s price kept dropping, and he didn’t know what to do.

Advertisement

Choosing what looked best on the menu and averting his family’s worried gaze was hard enough, so he locked himself in the restaurant’s bathroom. 

“At first I thought the token was going to go down, and then it was going to go back up to infinity,” Gamboa Silvestre said. “But that didn’t happen. I saw that it was going down and down, and my February 14th ended up being a nightmare.”

As investors began withdrawing their money en masse, so did Gamboa Silvestre. He ended up doubling his original investment in losses. 

The event also marked his permanent exit from the crypto ecosystem.

From Active Trader To Complete Exit

Gamboa Silvestre first ventured into crypto in 2016, mostly out of curiosity. However, he began to take it seriously in 2022 and became an active trader. 

Advertisement

The meme coin sector had treated him well at first. 

Gamboa Silvestre was among the first investors in TRUMP and MELANIA, the two tokens launched by US President Donald Trump and First Lady Melania Trump less than 48 hours before Trump assumed the presidency. 

He fared well for himself, and he believed that the story would be similar with Libra.

“I thought that, since Milei had been having different meetings with Donald Trump and Elon Musk, I said, well, this is going down the same path, they’re going to do things right, and I’m going to be able to make money with that,” Gamboa Silvestre recalled. 

But things didn’t turn out that way. Besides the money he lost, Gamboa Silvestre surrendered something that was even more important to him: his love for crypto. 

Advertisement

“After what happened with Libra, I completely stepped away from that world. I stopped doing something that I really liked that had generated me a lot of profitability during that period,” he said. “In the future, I saw myself only living from that. But I lost all confidence.” 

Today, the only ties that Gamboa Silvestre has left to the industry are his participation in a class action brought against Milei.

Data Disputes Milei’s Claims

Gamboa Silvestre is one of 212 investors seeking reparation for their losses in a lawsuit pending in Argentina. 

Even though Milei has repeatedly dialled down the impact that LIBRA had on investors, the facts tell a different story. 

According to data from Ripio, just one centralized exchange operating in the country, 1,329 citizens lost money. These numbers directly contradicted Milei’s previous claims that only a handful of Argentine investors had been affected. 

Advertisement

Argentines weren’t the only ones who had lost money. The impact was international, affecting investors anywhere from Bosnia to Lebanon to Australia. 

In the United States, a separate class action lawsuit is moving forward against Hayden Davis, the American investor and CEO of Kelsier Ventures, who has been accused of being the mastermind behind the project.

Advertisement

Trust Erodes As Investigation Continues

Despite it being a year since Libra launched, Milei has yet to provide a coherent explanation of his level of involvement in the token project.

According to Agustín Rombolá, one of the lawyers representing the complainants in the class action, Milei’s answers have varied greatly over the past year. 

“He first told us it was a casino, that you don’t cry in the casino. Then he told us that he had the right to sell his opinions. And then he told us that he was not working as the president at the moment of the tweet. [After that], he told us he was scammed,” Rombolá told BeInCrypto. 

According to Congressman Maximiliano Ferraro, one of the most outspoken critics in the Libra scandal, Milei has yet to address a key issue regarding his role in the case.

“There are still many questions unanswered. Who approached the President, and how did they give him that [smart contract address] that had more than 40 characters and did not have a public status?” Ferraro said in an interview in Spanish.

As the investigation into what happened continues, the financial damage is still being tallied, as is the loss of trust.

Advertisement

For Gamboa Silvestre and thousands of others, Libra was not just a failed investment but a turning point that reshaped their relationship with crypto altogether.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Crypto World

ETH Whales Are Quietly Buying the Dip: On-Chain Data Reveals What’s Really Happening

Published

on

Nexo Partners with Bakkt for US Crypto Exchange and Yield Programs

TLDR:

  • ETH-accumulating whales increased their balance as the realized price dropped, confirming active buying at lower levels. 
  • The realized cap for accumulating whale addresses rose, ruling out any selling activity within this cohort. 
  • ETH is currently trading at $1,949, with a 1.80% price gain recorded over the past seven-day period. 
  • Trader Daan Crypto warns that a drop below $1,900 could push ETH toward its February lows fairly quickly. 

ETH continues to draw attention from large investors even as its price shows signs of pressure. On-chain data reveals that accumulating whale addresses are not selling their holdings.

Instead, these whales are buying at lower price levels. The realized price metric for this cohort has bent downward, which may seem alarming at first glance.

However, a closer look at balance and realized cap data tells a more complete story about what these large holders are actually doing.

What the Realized Price Drop Really Means for ETH

The realized price of accumulating whale addresses has turned downward for the first time. This kind of movement can point to two separate scenarios in the market.

Either a whale with a higher cost basis sold their ETH, pulling the average down. Or new buying occurred at lower prices, which also pulls the realized price downward.

Advertisement

To determine which case applies, analysts cross-referenced balance data and realized cap figures. In the same period where the realized price dropped, the balance of accumulating whales went up. At the same time, their realized cap also rose, not fell.

These two data points together confirm that no selling took place among this cohort. On the contrary, whales added more ETH to their holdings at reduced price levels. This buying behavior is what caused the realized price to bend downward, not distribution.

Advertisement

CryptoMe, a well-followed Cryptoquant on-chain analytics analyst, stated that accumulating whales’ trust in ETH still looks strong based on this data set.

Price Levels and What Traders Are Watching Closely

Even with whale accumulation continuing, the broader price action remains uncertain. ETH is currently trading at $1,949.06, with a 24-hour volume of over $18.8 billion. The asset posted a 0.23% gain in the past 24 hours and a 1.80% rise over the past seven days.

Crypto trader Daan Crypto Trades pointed out that liquidity levels are clear in this range. According to Daan, a move above $2,150 would mark a new local high and likely push prices further up. However, a drop to $1,900 or below opens the door to revisiting February lows.

That caution is worth noting, especially since the accumulating whale data only covers one segment of the market. Other investor groups and broader macro conditions can still move the ETH price independently.

The on-chain data does not account for retail behavior, derivatives activity, or sentiment shifts.

Advertisement

Therefore, while whale accumulation is a constructive sign, it does not guarantee price direction in the short or medium term.

Traders and investors are advised to monitor multiple data sources before concluding where ETH heads next.

 

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Community Banks Saw $78M Net Outflows to Coinbase, KlariVis Study Finds

Published

on

Community Banks Saw $78M Net Outflows to Coinbase, KlariVis Study Finds

New analysis from banking data company KlariVis found that 90% of community banks in its sample had customers transacting with Coinbase. Across 53 banks where transaction direction could be determined, $2.77 flowed to the crypto exchange for every $1.00 returning, resulting in a net $78.3 million deposit shift over 13 months.

The study reviewed 225,577 Coinbase-related transactions across 92 community banks and found that transfers were heavily concentrated in money market accounts, where 96.3% of identifiable transaction volume represented funds leaving banks for the exchange.

“In general, community banks can be defined as those owned by organizations with less than $10 billion in assets,” the Federal Reserve says on its website.

KlariVis said that if the patterns observed in the sample hold nationally, more than 3,500 of the country’s roughly 3,950 community banks could have similar customer activity tied to Coinbase transfers.

Advertisement

The size of the 53 banks with directional data ranged from $185 million to $4.5 billion in deposits, with smaller institutions showing higher relative exposure. At banks with less than $1 billion in deposits, 82% to 84% of Coinbase-related transactions represented funds moving out, compared with about 66% to 67% at banks above $1 billion.

Across those banks, total outflows reached $122.4 million compared with $44.2 million in inflows. The average outbound transfer was $851, while inbound transfers averaged $2,999 but occurred far less frequently.

Source: KlariVis report

Money market accounts accounted for $36.8 million of the net outflow, with average transfers of $3,593, significantly higher than checking account movements.

Community banks hold about $4.9 trillion in deposits and fund about 60% of small business loans under $1 million and 80% of agricultural lending, according to the report, which argues sustained deposit migration could affect local credit availability.

Using academic estimates that small banks reduce lending by about $0.39 for every $1 decline in deposits, KlariVis said the $78.3 million net outflow could translate into about $30.5 million in reduced lending capacity.

Advertisement

Related: Coinbase’s Base transitions to its own architecture with eye on streamlining

CLARITY Act stalled by debate over stablecoin yield

The study comes as the US Congress, banks and crypto-native companies debate the CLARITY Act, which aims to define the regulatory framework for digital asset markets and determine whether crypto exchanges and stablecoin intermediaries can offer yield on customer holdings.

While the GENIUS Act, passed in July 2025, bars stablecoin issuers from paying interest, it does not prohibit third-party intermediaries such as Coinbase from offering yield on stablecoin balances, which has become a major point of contention between financial institutions and crypto companies.

In August, Banking groups, led by the Bank Policy Institute, urged lawmakers to address what they describe as a “loophole” in the law, warning that allowing exchanges to offer indirect yield could accelerate deposit outflows, disrupt credit flows and shift up to $6.6 trillion from the traditional banking system.

Advertisement

Last month, Bank of America CEO Brian Moynihan echoed that sentiment, saying interest-bearing stablecoins could draw up to $6 trillion from the US banking system, citing US Treasury-backed research suggesting deposits could migrate if issuers are allowed to pay yield. 

Meanwhile, Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong has pushed back against restrictions on stablecoin rewards. In January, he withdrew support for a version of the bill, writing on X: “We’d rather have no bill than a bad bill.” He raised several concerns about the draft, one of which was that it would eliminate stablecoin yield and protect banks from competition.

Source: Brian Armstrong

Despite ongoing tensions between banks and crypto companies, US Senator Bernie Moreno said on Wednesday he thinks the CLARITY Act could advance through Congress by April. Prediction marketplace Polymarket currently shows an 83% chance that the legislation will be signed into law this year.

Magazine: Bitcoin’s ‘biggest bull catalyst’ would be Saylor’s liquidation: Santiment founder