Connect with us

Crypto World

Unified Liquidity Across All Blockchains

Published

on

Unified Liquidity Across All Blockchains

For years, the crypto industry has treated liquidity as a finite resource that projects must compete for through incentives and marketing. This approach has created fragmentation across networks, with the same assets requiring separate liquidity pools on different chains. Georges Chouchani, founder of Euclid Protocol, believes the industry has been solving the wrong problem.

In this exclusive interview, Chouchani explains how Euclid is building infrastructure that generates and optimizes liquidity rather than simply moving it between networks. With a recent $3.5 million raise from strategic investors, the protocol is preparing for its mainnet launch and token generation event.

Q: Liquidity has been a problem in crypto for years. What made you think the industry was solving it the wrong way?

A: I don’t think it’s about solving it the wrong way, but with the existing tech at that time, it was treated as a finite resource that applications and chains compete to grab through incentives and huge marketing spends. This is what we always term the “Zero Sum Game”. This hurt the industry by focusing on short-term tactics to acquire this liquidity, which is, by itself, mercenary (follows the highest returns). Protocols could not focus on the bigger picture or spend on improving their product and attracting long-term users. 90% of protocols fail due to a lack of liquidity available to tap into. With our tech, this changes. 

Q: Most solutions today focus on moving liquidity between networks. Why did you believe generating and optimizing liquidity was the more durable approach?

Advertisement

A: Bridges and solutions to move liquidity between networks make this liquidity less efficient because the moved liquidity is no longer the “same” as the original asset and liquidity it originally was on the origin chain. This is why we see pools for ETH and WETH (wrapped ETH) as completely different; this means instead of having one efficient pool for ETH, it’s broken down into tens of pools across different protocols and chains. This means it will never be enough to onboard retail liquidity to decentralized protocols. 

With Euclid, we allow this liquidity to be accessible from any network and protocol, removing the need to move, wrap and fragment assets. This means protocols no longer spend millions on incentives for short-term access to liquidity and focus on their business model and initial product.

Q: You describe Euclid as a unified liquidity layer. In simple terms, how is that different from what most projects call “unified liquidity”?

A: Unified Liquidity is usually a term used by a protocol to explain that you can use an asset on any chain directly without directly bridging, or you can easily move assets between chains. Although a great solution for fragmentation, it does not tap into liquidity available in markets (where assets can be bought and sold), since the liquidity still exists inherently on different protocols or networks (by liquidity, we mean how much you can sell without a big impact on the amount you receive, or the best quote). 

Advertisement

When we say a unified liquidity layer, we mean where markets are unified and accessible from 50+ networks. Before Euclid, if there is a $1M pool on 10 chains, you can only trade against $1M in liquidity, although $10M of liquidity actually exists. 

We can think of aggregators in the traditional sense as brokers that help traders settle a trade easily by finding the best path and taking a small fee for the effort. But the path still depends on the most liquid market for the trade. 

Euclid, however, you can think of it as the New York Stock Exchange, where all brokers trade across the world, as it is the most liquid venue to access. This is what our infrastructure offers. The goal is to power thousands of protocols, traders, and market makers by offering 24/7 highly liquid markets across any network. A goal so far thought impossible.

Q: Instead of finding prices from other markets, Euclid sets prices itself using an AMM and its own orderbook. Why was that an important choice?

Advertisement

A: Finding prices from other markets defeats our original goal of unifying liquidity. We would become like any aggregator out there. We do not want to find the best price in the market for users; we want to be the best price in the market. It is not an important choice for us; it is the only way to do it. We all build on decentralized markets because we want to get rid of middlemen that charge fees and have access to privileged information that can be directly given to the user. 

Our infrastructure allows products and protocols to offer direct access to markets, investment opportunities, and more liquidity to users directly without bridges, aggregators, solvers, or whatever you want to call them, in a way that is both time and cost-efficient as well as more secure long-term. 

Q: Euclid allows one liquidity pool to work across more than 50 networks. What does that change for teams that usually manage liquidity chain by chain?

A: Assuming a lending protocol that plans to go multichain across 50 networks, it requires liquidations and hence markets to liquidate assets on these 50 networks, else they need to rebalance or bridge assets to where it’s liquid enough. Also, liquidity fragmented across these 50 networks will mean that there is less liquidity in one pool, hence less optimized prices, more slippage and hence tighter spreads and worse liquidations for users, making the whole user experience and business model worse.

Advertisement

With Euclid, we take care of the liquidity and offer you the best markets for the protocol to liquidate and trade from anywhere. No need to rebalance assets on the backend, hedge, or bridge. The protocol can spend more time and money on building a better protocol as well as generating more revenue to invest in it long-term.

This is a game-changer for anyone looking to build and deploy decentralized protocols. 

Q: A lot of Euclid’s efficiency happens behind the scenes. What kinds of costs or complexity does it remove for users and protocols?

A: I could talk on and on about this. What we offer is more than a better quote when you buy Bitcoin; our infrastructure allows the efficiencies to show in all areas of the user experience using an integrated protocol.

First of all, interacting with assets on different chains or having a multichain portfolio is as easy as using Binance; you don’t have to worry about gas management, bridging, or asset rebalance. Although a few dollars here and there don’t seem like a big improvement, this saves the protocols millions every year that they can reinvest in the product and user experience. 

Advertisement

$1M in volume a year for an average trader could lose over $10,000 to capital inefficiencies in fragmented markets. Over 1,000 traders, this is $10M in lost capital to the users and protocol. These numbers scale fast and are the “wasted energy” of Web3 that could be put to good use instead. This is one of the major reasons the NYSE was created and became the biggest market for people, brokers, and institutions to trade on a daily basis.

Q: Euclid is sometimes grouped with interoperability or chain abstraction projects. Why do you think that comparison misses the point?

A: Our infrastructure DOES improve interoperability and offer better chain abstraction, but it is definitely not what we are building. Unified markets onchain does make building multichain protocols or offering it to users much easier, but this is an effect of what we are building and not our main goal. 

The mess that chain abstraction and interoperability are solving exists because fragmentation exists across networks. Euclid solves this for liquidity. Liquidity no longer is fragmented and it trickles down directly to the user experience. 

Advertisement

Today, protocols tackling chain abstraction require fillers or solvers in the backend to complete a user intent instantly, which is expensive and is the main reason behind capital inefficiency. If these protocols use Euclid instead (which they will be very soon), they won’t need middlemen of any kind to fill user intents, and will provide a much more seamless user experience to users.

Q: Euclid recently raised $3.5 million from strategic investors. What was hardest about raising funds for an infrastructure project like this in the current market?

A:  Although the market is harder than ever to raise in and liquidity is drying up, the main benefit is that only investors who are close and passionate about our vision decided to participate, which shapes us as long-term believers and supporters of the protocol and what we do. We’ve received support from strategic partners with whom we will work long-term to achieve our vision, and we are really grateful for this.

I also believe that today it is clearer than ever that infrastructure that permanently solves fragmentation and offers efficient markets is needed more than ever. As they say, you can predict the future of tomorrow by what is funded today.

Q: Several of the investors and partners are closely tied to the broader ecosystem. How do these relationships shape what Euclid is building next?

Advertisement

A: Capital is just one part of what we look for in investors. The access to integrate Euclid and put it on the map is what we are looking for. We are more confident than ever that our product fits in the ecosystem, but introductions are needed to start the flywheel as well. 

It also creates the feedback loop of understanding what our partners need and their biggest problems, so we can make sure that our product solves this for them and keep iterating and updating our infrastructure to match the demand out there.

Q: As Euclid moves toward mainnet and a token, how are you thinking about the token’s role within the system rather than as a standalone asset?

A: The token is a value-accruing asset that aligns the entire ecosystem’s incentives. Every trade directly and indirectly accrues value to the holders, as well as it allows the protocol to use this token to incentivize more integrations (hence volume) and liquidity for even more efficient markets, and hence even more demand on trades, creating what we call the liquidity flywheel. 

It will also offer governance rights to its stakers to participate in voting on future incentives, fee structures, and next iterations of the product.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Crypto World

BTC takes aim at $70,000 after Trump says U.S. ahead of schedule in Iran attack

Published

on

Oil's historic day

A wild 24 hours continued in all markets after President Trump said the war against Iran could be over soon.

The action against Iran is “very far ahead” of what was expected to be a four-to-five-week time frame, said Trump in late-afternoon comments. He is expected to give updates on the situation at 5:30 pm ET.

Already in the midst of a sharp reversal higher after plunging Sunday evening as oil soared as much as 30%, crypto and equity markets added to gains following the comments.

Just ahead of the close, the Nasdaq was ahead 1.25% and S&P 500 0.8%. Bitcoin at just above $69,000 was up 2.4% over the past 24 hours.

Advertisement

Oil, meanwhile, tumbled even further. After rising as much as 30% to $120 per barrel on Sunday evening, WTI crude plunged all the way back to $85, now lower by 6% for the day.

Oil's historic day
Oil’s historic day (finviz)

Crypto-related stocks added to Monday’s gains, with Circle (CRCL) up 10% while Strategy (MSTR) and Coinbase (COIN) were 5% and 2% higher, respectively.

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Bitcoin Eyes $70K, Oil Prices Dump as Trump Claims the War Is Almost Over

Published

on

BTCUSD Mar 9. Source: TradingView


The S&P 500 and gold are also surging.

After a day of more fluctuations prompted by the quickly developing situation in the Middle East, bitcoin’s price aimed at $70,000 minutes ago as Trump addressed the war and the Strait of Hormuz.

His words sent shockwaves through other financial fields as well, especially with oil, as the CFDs on WTI Crude Oil plunged to under $90 per barrel after skyrocketing to $120 earlier today.

Advertisement

The POTUS’s indication that the war is pretty much completed comes in a rather intriguing time, as Iran just chose a new Supreme Leader – Mojtaba Khamenei, who is the son of the former. Trump repeatedly outlined that he is not happy with the choice, calling it a big mistake.

At the same time, reports continue to emerge that several countries in the region, including the UAE and Turkey, keep intercepting more drones and missiles from Iran.

Advertisement

While also addressing the situation in the Middle East, President Trump reportedly added that the US is mulling taking over the Strait of Hormuz, which has been essentially closed for days, thus reducing the amount of transported goods, mostly oil.

As mentioned above, oil prices dumped again following Trump’s latest remarks after reaching a multi-year peak this morning. Gold and the S&P 500 went on a run, with the former tapping $5,140/oz, while the latter climbed above 6,800.

You may also like:

Bitcoin quickly jumped from $68,000 to $69,600 (on Bitstamp) but was stopped there and now trades around $69,000 again. Ethereum has jumped past $2,000, while SOL is above $85.

BTCUSD Mar 9. Source: TradingView
BTCUSD Mar 9. Source: TradingView

 

SPECIAL OFFER (Exclusive)

Binance Free $600 (CryptoPotato Exclusive): Use this link to register a new account and receive $600 exclusive welcome offer on Binance (full details).
Advertisement

LIMITED OFFER for CryptoPotato readers at Bybit: Use this link to register and open a $500 FREE position on any coin!

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Pudgy Penguins’ Pudgy World launch lifts pengu token

Published

on

Pudgy Penguins’ Pudgy World launch lifts pengu token

Pudgy Penguins’ Pudgy World launch is turning PENGU into a high‑beta bet on NFT gaming as traders test whether the brand’s cultural hype can translate into lasting on-chain activity.

Summary

  • Pudgy Penguins’ Pudgy World launch is boosting attention and liquidity around the ecosystem’s PENGU token, turning it into a high-beta bet on NFT gaming.
  • PENGU’s trading volume has surged into the nine-figure daily range on some venues, signaling aggressive speculation rather than just passive community holding.
  • The launch ties Pudgy’s Web3 IP, gaming, and token together, positioning PENGU as a leveraged play on whether the brand can convert cultural hype into sustainable on-chain activity.

Global crypto markets are being steered less by conviction and more by where the next forced seller sits. At the margin, market structure, macro, and meme‑driven liquidity are colliding in real time – with Pudgy Penguins’ latest gaming push emerging as a surprisingly clear case study.

Advertisement

Pudgy Penguins (PENGU), one of NFT land’s stickier brands, has launched its third title, Pudgy World, extending the project’s reach from profile pictures into casual gaming. CoinGecko highlighted the move in a post stating: “Pudgy Penguins launches its third game, Pudgy World. $PENGU is now trending #2 on CoinGecko, up 7.4% today.” The framing is not accidental. Trending status and intraday performance now function as both marketing and market structure, broadcasting where liquidity and attention are rotating in a session dominated by macro‑sensitive flows.

Underneath the social buzz, the numbers are modest but telling. CoinGecko data show Pudgy Penguins (PENGU) trading around $0.0069, with roughly $105.8 million changing hands over the last 24 hours. It is a classic reflexive micro‑cap: price action feeds narrative, which in turn drives more flow into a tightly held token tied to recognizable IP. As one community‑aligned commentator observed in response to the launch, the $PENGU ecosystem is “actively expanding and attracting new users,” with Pudgy World seen as evidence the brand is “making waves” rather than fading into NFT winter.

Against that sits a far heavier macro backdrop. Bitcoin trades near $68,615, up about 2.5% over the past day, on 24‑hour volumes above $50.7 billion according to CoinMarketCap, reaffirming its role as the market’s beta instrument when global risk sentiment shifts. Ethereum hovers around $2,011, down roughly 3.7% in the same period, with a market cap near $260.2 billion as traders debate how much further the current drawdown can run before structural buyers re‑engage.

In practice, this leaves PENGU and similar tokens trading like long‑dated venture risk embedded inside a macro‑sensitive, dollar‑denominated system. The launch of Pudgy World may be a bright spot for NFT loyalists, but it is also a reminder: even the most playful corners of crypto now sit squarely inside a trading environment defined by liquidity, leverage, and the timing of the next forced seller.Provide 3 titles for this article. The titles should be no more than 90 characters, only capitalize essential words, names and terms not every word. Next, summarize the entire article in 160 characters or less. Then provide 3 summary bullet points. write an original short decription for socials max length 200 characters, use emojis.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

DeFi lending platform Compound Finance hijacked again

Published

on

DeFi lending platform Compound Finance hijacked again

DeFi users reported suspicious functionality on the website of lending platform Compound Finance on Sunday.

The incident is the latest in a string of website hijackings that have affected Maple Finance, OpenEden and Curvance.

It’s the second time attackers have compromised Compound’s front end in less than two years.

Read more: Compound Finance and Celer Network websites compromised in ‘front-end’ attacks

Advertisement

Compound’s security provider later published an update on the project’s governance forum, reassuring users that the incident had been rectified and “all other credentials on the affected infrastructure account have been rotated.”

The post explains that the project’s website redirected users to “a phishing site hosted on a lookalike domain (‘compOOnd’),” but “no user loss of funds [was] identified.”

Compounding errors

Previously, the Compound front end was hacked in July 2024, along with other Squarespace-based DeFi domains.

There are worries that such attacks may become more common as AI tools lower the bar for would-be phishing scammers.

Advertisement

Read more: AI just bypassed the Cloudflare protection that DeFi needs

Luckily, any users of Compound were better protected yesterday.

Advertisement

According to the forum post, the app.compound.finance subdomain, on which users connect wallets and make transactions, “is served via IPFS, allowing [security providers] to independently verify its integrity.”

Sunday’s incident is the latest in a string of blunders for what was once one of DeFi’s top protocols.

Last year, the Compound DAO came under scrutiny over conflict-of-interest concerns related to service provider Gauntlet.

In 2022, an operational error bricked the cETH market (worth over $800 million at the time) for a week while a fix was implemented. The previous year, almost $150 million of excess rewards were distributed, also by mistake.

Advertisement

Got a tip? Send us an email securely via Protos Leaks. For more informed news and investigations, follow us on XBluesky, and Google News, or subscribe to our YouTube channel.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Mastercard and Google Team Up to Build Trust for AI-Powered Shopping

Published

on

Mastercard and Google Team Up to Build Trust for AI-Powered Shopping

Verifiable Intent creates a tamper-resistant, cryptographic record of what a user authorized when an AI agent acts on their behalf.

Mastercard has unveiled Verifiable Intent, a new open, standards-based trust framework co-developed with Google, designed specifically for “agentic commerce” — a world where artificial intelligence (AI) systems don’t just assist shoppers, but actively plan, decide, and complete purchases autonomously.

The core problem Verifiable Intent aims to solve is visibility: when a consumer delegates a purchase to an AI agent, the clear “click buy” or “tap to pay” moment that traditionally signals intent disappears. Mastercard’s Chief Digital Officer Pablo Fourez argues that this creates a new challenge for every party involved — consumers need assurance their instructions were followed, merchants need confirmation an agent is authorized to buy, and issuers need to distinguish legitimate activity from fraud.

To address this, Verifiable Intent creates a tamper-resistant, cryptographic record of what a user authorized when an AI agent acts on their behalf — linking identity, intent, and action into a single, privacy-preserving audit trail.

Advertisement

The framework uses Selective Disclosure, a privacy control technique, to ensure that only the minimum necessary information is shared between parties and only when needed, allowing merchants and issuers to verify transactions without access to sensitive consumer data.

It leverages widely adopted standards from the FIDO Alliance, EMVCo, the Internet Engineering Task Force, and the World Wide Web Consortium, and is designed to work across agentic protocols, devices, wallets, and platforms. Mastercard says Verifiable Intent will be integrated into its Agent Pay APIs in the coming months.

Crypto Rails Join the Fray

Not everyone sees traditional payment networks as the right foundation for AI-driven commerce, however, highlighting a growing debate about whether AI agents will ultimately transact through incumbent networks like Mastercard or bypass them entirely in favor of crypto-native infrastructure.

“Very soon there are going to be more AI agents than humans making transactions. They can’t open a bank account, but they can own a crypto wallet. Think about it,” Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong posted on X today.

Advertisement

In September, EigenCloud, Ethereum’s largest restaking protocol with nearly $9 billion in total value locked, announced a partnership with Google Cloud to serve as the verifiable backbone for AI agent payments.

Meanwhile, the Ethereum Foundation launched a dedicated AI initiative called the dAI Team, with a stated mission to make Ethereum the preferred settlement and coordination layer for the emerging “machine economy.”

The following month, attention turned to x402 protocols, which enable AI agent payment systems and increase the practicality of agentic AI-led finance.

Taken together, these developments paint a picture of an industry racing to solve the same core problem from two very different directions. Mastercard and traditional finance are building trust layers on top of existing payment rails, while crypto proponents are betting that blockchain infrastructure is better suited to a world where AI agents are first-class economic actors.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

140,000 BTC Exit Short-Term Holders as Capitulation Pressure Builds in Bitcoin

Published

on

Net Metrics Miss the Real Story as Long-Term Holders Spend 370,000 BTC Monthly


Short-term holders are currently facing about 24% unrealized losses.

Bitcoin’s short-term holders have continued to realize losses, as on-chain data found sustained selling pressure across most of the past week.

According to the latest analysis by Axel Adler Jr., the Short-Term Holder Spent Output Profit Ratio (STH SOPR), a metric that measures whether coins held for less than 155 days are being sold at a profit or loss, remained below the neutral level of 1.0 for seven of the last eight days between March 2 and March 9.

Advertisement

A reading below 1.0 indicates that the cohort is selling at prices lower than their acquisition cost.

Bitcoin’s Weak Hands Are Selling

As of March 9, the intraday average STH SOPR stood at 0.987, and only six out of 35 observed blocks, or about 17%, closed above the 1.0 threshold. The 7-day moving average for the metric remained near 0.992, which further supports the view that loss realization among short-term holders has persisted for several consecutive days rather than appearing as a single isolated event.

During the same period, the metric crossed above 1.0 only once, on March 4, when the price of Bitcoin briefly reached $74,000 before returning to loss-selling territory. The lowest weekly reading occurred on March 6 at 0.979, while March 8 registered 0.991. Both of these instances confirm that most transactions from this cohort were executed below cost basis.

Adler explained that the first clear signal of a change in market conditions would be STH SOPR closing above 1.0 for several consecutive days alongside rising prices.

Advertisement

Capitulation

In addition to the profitability metric, Adler examined changes in terms of the overall supply held by short-term investors. Over the past two weeks, the total volume of coins within the short-term holder cohort declined from approximately 6.06 million BTC to about 5.92 million BTC. This essentially indicated that roughly 140,000 BTC left the cohort.

You may also like:

Such a reduction reflects either capitulation through realized losses or the natural aging of coins into long-term holder status after surpassing the 155-day holding threshold. At the same time, the cohort’s realized price remained around $89,028, while the market price traded near $67,000 during the period analyzed.

The difference represents an unrealized loss of roughly 24% for the average short-term holder. Adler observed that this gap between the realized price and the current market value creates a structural supply overhang in the market. As prices recover, some short-term investors who purchased at higher levels may use rallies as opportunities to exit positions without losses, and would potentially add supply and reduce the strength of upward moves.

The combination of the two indicators points to an ongoing “cohort cleansing,” in which the more price-sensitive segment of the market is gradually exiting through selling pressure rather than through a recovery in profitability.

Advertisement
SPECIAL OFFER (Exclusive)

Binance Free $600 (CryptoPotato Exclusive): Use this link to register a new account and receive $600 exclusive welcome offer on Binance (full details).

LIMITED OFFER for CryptoPotato readers at Bybit: Use this link to register and open a $500 FREE position on any coin!

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana ETFs flash red as prices stay resilient

Published

on

Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana ETFs flash red as prices stay resilient

U.S. Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana ETFs saw rare same‑day outflows on March 9, but positive weekly flows and steady spot prices point to rotation, not capitulation.

Summary

  • Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana ETFs all booked one‑day net outflows, signaling a sharp but concentrated de‑risking across major U.S. spot products.
  • Weekly flows remain positive for BTC, ETH, and SOL, suggesting ETF desks are rotating risk within crypto rather than exiting the asset class.
  • Despite red ETF prints, Bitcoin trades in the high‑$60K band, Ethereum near $2,000, and Solana just under $90, underscoring a resilient spot tape.

U.S. crypto ETFs flashed a rare warning signal on March 9 as spot products for Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana all recorded simultaneous net outflows, even as underlying prices held firm near recent ranges.

ETF flows: risk-on, but defensive

On-chain analytics firm Lookonchain reported that U.S. Bitcoin ETFs saw a one-day net outflow of 5,409 BTC, while Ethereum ETFs shed 36,599 ETH and Solana products lost 68,933 SOL, underscoring a sharp but concentrated bout of de-risking across majors. A separate summary of the same dataset framed the move as a short-term shock inside a still-positive weekly trend, noting that “Bitcoin ETFs experienced a one-day net outflow of 5,409 BTC… however, the seven-day net inflow stood at a positive 8,154 BTC,” with Ethereum and Solana showing similar one-day outflows but net inflows over seven days.

Advertisement

In that analysis, Solana stood out as the most volatile leg of the trade: “Solana ETFs displayed the most dramatic shifts… with a one-day net outflow of 68,933 SOL… Contrarily, the seven-day net inflow reached +266,247 SOL,” a pattern more consistent with fast money rotation than structural capitulation.

Macro structure: liquidity, not faith

The flows come against a macro backdrop where crypto still trades as a high‑beta expression of global liquidity rather than a simple tech proxy.

As one ETF strategist put it in the Lookonchain-linked commentary, recent moves “could influence trading strategies, as traders monitor whether these outflows represent profit-taking or a shift in investor confidence amid broader market volatility,” highlighting that desks are treating ETF flows as a real‑time barometer of positioning, not a referendum on the asset class itself.

Advertisement

Price action: resilient tape

Despite the ETF outflows, majors held up. Bitcoin recently traded around the high‑$60K band, with multiple spot dashboards placing it near $68K–$69K and up roughly 1–3% over the last 24 hours at press time.
Ethereum changed hands near $2,000–$2,050, gaining about 3–4% on the day, while Solana hovered around $85.20, up 3.69% in 24 hours as it continued to “grind sideways just under $90.”

For traders, the message is blunt: ETF red prints are back, but as long as weekly flows stay positive and spot refuses to break, the underlying market structure still looks like rotation within a risk bucket rather than an exit from it.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Crypto Traders Ignore High Oil Prices As BTC, Altcoins Rally

Published

on

Crypto Traders Ignore High Oil Prices As BTC, Altcoins Rally

Key points:

  • Rising oil prices have not hurt crypto sentiment as buyers attempt to push Bitcoin above $69,000

  • Buyers are attempting to propel several major altcoins above their overhead resistance levels, indicating demand at lower levels.

A sharp rally in oil prices failed to deter cryptocurrency buyers who pushed Bitcoin (BTC) above $69,000 on Monday. Although the spot BTC exchange-traded funds witnessed outflows on Thursday and Friday, the week saw net inflows of $568.45 million per SoSoValue data.  That was the second successive week of net inflows, a first in five months.

While some analysts believe that BTC may have bottomed out, on-chain analyst Willy Woo said in a post on X that BTC was solidly in the middle of a bear market from a long-range liquidity perspective and was forming a bull trap. 

Crypto market data daily view. Source: TradingView

Usually, when negative news fails to sink the price to a new low in a bearish trend, it suggests that the selling may be drying up. That doesn’t guarantee a sharp rally in the near term, as markets tend to consolidate in a range for a while before starting the next leg higher. 

Could buyers push BTC and major altcoins above their resistance levels? Let’s analyze the charts of the top 10 cryptocurrencies to find out. 

Advertisement

S&P 500 Index price prediction

The S&P 500 Index (SPX) closed below the 6,775 level on Friday, indicating that the bears are attempting to take charge.

SPX daily chart. Source: Cointelegraph/TradingView

The moving averages have completed a bearish crossover, and the relative strength index (RSI) has dipped into the negative territory, indicating the path of least resistance is to the downside. The next crucial support to watch out for on the downside is 6,550. If the level cracks, the correction may deepen to 6,147.

Buyers will have to drive the price above the moving averages to signal strength. That improves the prospects of a rally to the 7,290 level.

US Dollar Index price prediction

The US Dollar Index (DXY) is facing resistance near the 99.50 level, but the bulls have kept up the pressure.

DXY daily chart. Source: Cointelegraph/TradingView

The upsloping 20-day exponential moving average (98.17) and the RSI above the 63 level suggest that the bulls are in command. If the price closes above the 99.50 level, the index may retest the critical overhead resistance at the 100.54 level. A close above the 100.54 resistance suggests the start of a new up move.

Sellers will have to tug the price below the moving averages to retain the index inside the 95.50 to 100.54 range.

Advertisement

Bitcoin price prediction

BTC fell below the 20-day EMA ($68,553) on Friday, but the bears could not sink the price below the support line. That suggests demand at lower levels.

BTC/USDT daily chart. Source: Cointelegraph/TradingView

If the price maintains above the 20-day EMA, the likelihood of a break above the $74,508 resistance increases. Such a move suggests that the BTC/USDT pair may have bottomed out in the short term. The Bitcoin price may then soar to $84,000, where the bears are expected to mount a strong defense.

This positive view will be invalidated in the near term if the price turns down and breaks below the support line. The pair may then drop to the vital support at $60,000.

Ether price prediction

Ether (ETH) broke below the 20-day EMA ($2,018) on Friday, but the bears could not sink the price to the $1,750 level.

ETH/USDT daily chart. Source: Cointelegraph/TradingView

That suggests selling dries up at lower levels. The bulls are attempting to push the price back above the 20-day EMA. If they manage to do that, the ETH/USDT pair may climb to the 50-day SMA ($2,249). Sellers will attempt to halt the relief rally at the 50-day SMA, but if the bulls prevail, the pair may jump to $2,600.

Contrary to this assumption, if the Ether price turns down from the $2,111 level and breaks below $1,916, it signals that the pair may remain inside the range for a while longer.

Advertisement

BNB price prediction

BNB (BNB) fell below the 20-day EMA ($633) on Friday, but the bears could not pull the price to the $570 level.

BNB/USDT daily chart. Source: Cointelegraph/TradingView

That attracted buyers who are trying to push the price back above the 20-day EMA. If they succeed, the BNB/USDT pair may retest the overhead resistance at $670. Sellers are expected to fiercely defend the $670 level, as a close above it opens the doors for a rally to $730 and then $790.

Instead, if the BNB price turns down from the current level or the $670 resistance, it suggests that the range-bound action may continue for a few more days. Sellers will have to yank the pair below the $570 level to start the next leg of the downtrend toward $500.

XRP price prediction

XRP (XRP) has been trading just below the 20-day EMA ($1.39) for several days, indicating that the bulls continue to exert pressure.

XRP/USDT daily chart. Source: Cointelegraph/TradingView

A close above the 20-day EMA will be the first sign of strength. The XRP/USDT pair may then rally to the $1.61 level and subsequently to the downtrend line of the descending channel pattern. Buyers will have to break and sustain the XRP price above the downtrend line to signal a short-term trend change.

Conversely, if the price turns down from the 20-day EMA and breaks below $1.27, it suggests that the bulls have given up. That may sink the pair to the support line, which is likely to attract buyers.

Advertisement

Solana price prediction

Solana (SOL) has been consolidating between $76 and $95 for several days, indicating a balance between supply and demand.

SOL/USDT daily chart. Source: Cointelegraph/TradingView

The flattish 20-day EMA ($85) and the RSI just below the midpoint do not give a clear advantage either to the bulls or the bears. 

The next trending move is expected to begin on a close above $95 or below $76. If buyers drive the Solana price above $95, the rally may reach $117. Alternatively, a break and close below $76 suggests that the bears have overpowered the bulls. The SOL/USDT pair may then slump to the Feb. 6 low of $67.

Related: Bitcoin at $67K despite oil shock is ‘strongest indicator’ bottom may be in

Dogecoin price prediction

Dogecoin (DOGE) fell below the $0.09 support on Sunday, but the bears could not sustain the lower levels. The bulls bought the dip and are attempting to reclaim the level.

Advertisement
DOGE/USDT daily chart. Source: Cointelegraph/TradingView

If the relief rally turns down from the 20-day EMA ($0.09), it suggests that the bears remain in control. That heightens the risk of a drop to Feb. 6 low of $0.08. 

Buyers are likely to have other plans. They will attempt to push the Dogecoin price above the moving averages. If they can pull it off, the DOGE/USDT pair may surge to the breakdown level of $0.12. Buyers will have to achieve a close above the $0.12 resistance to suggest that the pair may have bottomed out at $0.08.

Cardano price prediction

Cardano (ADA) slipped below the $0.25 support on Sunday, but the bears are struggling to sustain the lower levels.

ADA/USDT daily chart. Source: Cointelegraph/TradingView

The bulls will attempt a recovery, which is expected to face selling at the 20-day EMA ($0.27). If the price turns down sharply from the 20-day EMA, the bears will strive to sink the ADA/USDT pair to the support line of the descending channel pattern. If the Cardano price rebounds off the support line with strength, it suggests that the pair may remain inside the channel for some more time.

The bulls will have to drive and maintain the price above the downtrend line to signal a potential short-term trend change.

Bitcoin Cash price prediction

Bitcoin Cash (BCH) has been witnessing a tough battle between the bulls and the bears at the $443 level.

Advertisement
BCH/USDT daily chart. Source: Cointelegraph/TradingView

The bulls are attempting a relief rally, but the bears are likely to halt any recovery attempt at the 20-day EMA ($478). If the Bitcoin Cash price turns down sharply from the 20-day EMA, it increases the likelihood of a break below the $443 level. 

If that happens, the BCH/USDT pair will complete a bearish head-and-shoulder pattern. That may start a downward move to $375.

Contrarily, a close above the 20-day EMA suggests that the selling pressure is reducing. The pair may then rally to the 50-day SMA ($525).