A prominent blockchain researcher is pushing back against critics who say the Ethereum Foundation is dragging down ETH’s fundamentals. William Mougayar—Toronto-based investor, researcher, and author—argued in a post that the Ethereum Foundation (EF) is performing exactly the role it was designed for: a protocol steward that should diminish its own centrality over time, rather than act as a marketing engine for ETH or the ecosystem.

In a message posted on X titled “Leave the Foundation Alone,” Mougayar contends that ETH, Ethereum, and the Ethereum Foundation are three distinct entities with separate trajectories. He described the asset as money, the infrastructure as shared compute, and the Foundation as a non-profit steering the protocol toward irrelevance for its founders—an arrangement he says is essential for long-term decentralization. He warned that conflating the three leads to misguided forecasts and misplaced anger.

The exchange comes amid renewed chatter within the crypto community about the EF’s recent moves—such as ETH sales, unstaking activity, and a period of relative quiet from the organization—that critics claim undermine ETH’s price performance.

Despite the controversy, Mougayar’s stance underscores a broader debate: should a foundation that helps shepherd a public protocol actively market the asset or should it minimize its footprint to ensure the protocol survives beyond any one group’s interests? He likened calls for the EF to “king-making” to expecting the IETF to run Super Bowl ads for TCP/IP, arguing that foundational bodies are not tasked with such promotion.

The discussion unfolds as ETH trades near $2,117, up about 4.7% on the day, according to market data. Yet the token remains well off its peak, trading more than 57% below its all-time high of roughly $4,953 reached in August last year. The price backdrop adds nuance to the EF’s strategic moves and the community’s reactions.

The timeline around the EF’s liquidity actions has added fuel to the debate. In recent weeks, the foundation completed a third over-the-counter sale of ETH to BitMine Immersion Technologies, offloading 10,000 ETH at an average price of $2,292—roughly $22.9 million, according to Cointelegraph’s reporting. When included with two earlier transactions—5,000 ETH in March and another 10,000 ETH in the prior week—the foundation’s ETH sales to BitMine totalled about $47 million in recent weeks. The timing of these sales has been closely watched as a barometer for the EF’s stance on liquidity management and market signaling.

At the same time, the EF has unstaked substantial quantities of ETH. In the same period, the foundation unstaked 17,035 ETH, worth about $40 million. Earlier in the month, it also unstaked 21,270 ETH from the Lido validator pool, worth nearly $50 million. These movements—combined with ongoing OTC sales—have fed ongoing speculation about the EF’s impact on ETH’s circulating supply and liquidity, and how investors should interpret the foundation’s evolving balance sheet.

Key takeaways

• The Ethereum Foundation frames its role as a protocol steward aiming to reduce centrality over time, rather than acting as a marketer for ETH or the ecosystem.
• Critics argue that EF activity—sales, unstaking, and silence—can influence ETH price, while supporters say such moves reflect prudent liquidity management and long-term protocol health.
• Recent EF liquidity moves include a 10,000 ETH OTC sale to BitMine at an average of $2,292, plus earlier sales, totaling roughly $47 million in recent weeks.
• Unstaking actions—17,035 ETH (~$40 million) and 21,270 ETH (~$50 million) from Lido—have added to the perception of the EF gradually reducing its on-chain footprint.
• The debate touches on broader questions of decentralization, governance, and market signaling in a post-merge Ethereum ecosystem.

EF’s stated mission vs. market perceptions

According to Mougayar, the EF is deliberately hardening the protocol by shipping upgrades and funding research that others do not fund. He described this as a deliberate “subtraction path”—a shift toward a future where the world does not rely on the EF as a central node. In his view, this approach is what enables Ethereum to evolve beyond the influence of any single organization, which in turn can foster resilience as the network grows.

That framing stands in contrast to increasing calls within parts of the community for more aggressive outreach or institutional engagement from the Foundation. Mougayar’s analogy—comparing the EF to a protocol standard body rather than a marketing arm—highlights a core tension in how readers interpret the foundation’s responsibilities in a rapidly maturing ecosystem.

Market observers, however, note that the EF’s actions are not occurring in a vacuum. The ETH price, while resilient in the near term, has faced sustained pressure from broader crypto cycles, macro factors, and debates about token supply, staking dynamics, and institutional participation. The latest price moves—ETH up roughly 4.7% on the day—show that the market remains sensitive to liquidity shifts and the narrative around Ethereum’s governance and development path.

Past reporting from Cointelegraph on the EF’s liquidity activity provides context for the latest moves. The 10,000 ETH sale to BitMine was the third OTC transaction in a sequence that has now moved tens of millions of dollars in ETH to a single buyer. Separately, the foundation’s unstaking activity has added a new layer of complexity to supply dynamics, particularly as ETH approaches key milestones in staking and network upgrades. The combined effect of sales and unstaking continues to shape debates about how the EF’s balance sheet and decision-making influence investor sentiment and price action.

For readers seeking more granular context on these transactions, the accompanying coverage reported that the third OTC sale occurred at an average price of $2,292 per ETH, and that the foundation’s unstaking volumes include a notable 17,035 ETH from staking deployments and an additional 21,270 ETH drawn from Lido staking pools—figures that underscore the scale of the Foundation’s liquidity management in the current cycle.

As the community digests these moves, observers will be watching not only ETH’s price trajectory but also the cadence of upgrades and the Foundation’s funding of independent research. In a market where liquidity and developer momentum are often intertwined, the EF’s strategy to fund research and advance protocol improvements without heavy promotional efforts remains a defining feature of Ethereum’s evolution.

Looking ahead, industry watchers will ask: where does the EF’s subtraction path lead next? Will further upgrades continue to comingle with liquidity actions, and how will institutional actors respond to a Foundation that openly embraces a reduced role in day-to-day market signaling? If the EF maintains its course, the next few quarters could illuminate how a decentralized protocol sustains momentum while gradually stepping back from direct influence—an experiment with implications for governance, funding models, and long-term network health.

Readers should stay attentive to forthcoming upgrades and EF-funded research milestones, as these signals will shape how investors and builders interpret the Foundation’s balancing act between stewardship and autonomy. Whether this strategy will translate into clearer long-term value for ETH holders remains a central question for the ecosystem in the months ahead.

Key Takeaways

• A preliminary framework for concluding hostilities between the U.S. and Iran is approaching completion, according to President Trump.
• The agreement includes provisions to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, a critical passage for approximately 20% of the world’s petroleum.
• Negotiators have established a 30-60 day window to resolve outstanding matters and finalize terms.
• Tehran’s nuclear ambitions represent the most significant unresolved obstacle in negotiations.
• Crude markets have already responded with declining prices following initial reports of diplomatic progress.

President Trump revealed on Saturday that a preliminary accord with Iran is approaching completion, establishing groundwork for comprehensive peace negotiations. The proposed agreement includes reopening the Strait of Hormuz, the critical maritime corridor that facilitates approximately one-fifth of global petroleum transportation.

The President disclosed the development via Truth Social, indicating that the framework had been “substantially completed” through discussions involving the United States, Iran, and multiple intermediary nations. He stated that complete details would be made public in the near future.

The strategic waterway has remained inaccessible since Iran imposed a closure following combined U.S.-Israeli military operations that resulted in the death of Iran’s long-standing leader Ali Khamenei during late February. This blockade has significantly impacted international petroleum markets and intensified wider economic challenges.

Brent crude contracts concluded Friday’s trading session slightly above $100 per barrel, while the American WTI benchmark finished the week exceeding $96. Oil prices had already begun retreating Thursday when preliminary indications of a possible ceasefire arrangement emerged in media reports.

Diplomatic Progress and Negotiations

On Saturday, Trump conducted conversations with heads of state from Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Qatar, Pakistan, Turkey, Egypt, Jordan, and Bahrain. These discussions were followed by a call with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who has traditionally resisted diplomatic overtures toward Iran.

Esmail Baghaei, spokesperson for Iran’s foreign ministry, verified that both nations were approaching the “concluding phase” of developing a memorandum of understanding. He characterized the 30-60 day timeframe for reaching a comprehensive agreement as achievable.

The proposed framework outlines that Iran would provisionally reopen the Strait of Hormuz and eliminate passage fees during the negotiation period. Reciprocally, Washington would terminate its maritime blockade affecting Iranian harbors. Tehran is additionally pursuing rapid release of roughly $100 billion in frozen financial assets currently held internationally under American sanctions.

Pakistan, along with multiple Arab states, has advocated for extending the existing ceasefire by six weeks to provide additional time for diplomatic efforts.

Nuclear Program Stands as Major Obstacle

The preliminary framework leaves unaddressed the fundamental disagreement concerning Iran’s nuclear capabilities. The United States seeks a comprehensive agreement incorporating a two-decade moratorium on Iranian nuclear operations and Tehran’s commitment to transfer its inventory of highly enriched uranium to American custody.

Iran has categorically refused both demands. Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei declared publicly this week that no enriched uranium would be permitted to leave Iranian territory. Officials from Tehran have indicated that nuclear matters should be deliberated at a subsequent stage, concurrent with comprehensive sanctions removal.

Baghaei informed state media: “At this stage, our entire focus is on ending the war.”

Additional unresolved matters encompass Iran’s ballistic missile capabilities and its assistance to regional armed factions — both representing critical concerns for Israel and Washington’s Gulf allies.

Iran’s semiofficial Fars News agency disputed Trump’s characterization, asserting that any agreement would preserve Iran’s authority over transit routes, scheduling, and passage authorization through the Strait of Hormuz.

Hostilities have not formally concluded. American military personnel and equipment remain deployed in Israel, and armed conflict could restart should diplomatic efforts fail.

Certain Republican senators, including Lindsey Graham, have openly encouraged Trump to recommence military operations rather than offer diplomatic compromises.

This framework represents the most recent chapter in a protracted series of exchanges between Washington and Tehran that has alternated between promising diplomatic breakthroughs and threats of renewed military engagement.

XRP Ledger developer and Xaman founder Wietse Wind renewed a warning to XRP users after scam accounts again targeted the wallet’s brand. 

His latest post said fake Xaman accounts and websites continue to promote a desktop wallet and airdrop that do not exist.

The warning follows a similar alert from Ripple CTO Emeritus David Schwartz earlier this month, when he said fake airdrops, giveaways, and impersonators had increased across the XRP Ledger community. The fresh notice keeps attention on social engineering risks around XRP wallets.

Fake Xaman accounts target XRP users

Wind said more than 20 new X scam accounts impersonate Xaman Wallet each day. He also said more than 10 new domains appear daily, with websites pretending to be linked to the official wallet.

He warned users in direct terms: “There is no desktop wallet! No airdrop!” He added that the team reports the accounts, but new ones continue to appear. The message was aimed at users who may see fake links in replies, posts, or search results.

Scammers push fake wallet downloads

The fake campaigns often use copied branding to make users believe they are dealing with Xaman. Some sites push a fake desktop wallet, while others promote free token claims that ask users to connect wallets or sign transactions.

Xaman is a self-custody wallet for the XRP Ledger and Xahau ecosystem. Its official site says users control their assets through private keys held on their own devices, which makes transaction signing a key security step.

Earlier reports also described fake browser plugins, fake support pages, and direct messages from accounts posing as wallet staff. Those warnings said Xaman users should rely on in-app support and avoid outside channels that ask for wallet access.

Ripple-linked warnings continue

Related coverage reported that Schwartz warned XRPL users about a sharp rise in fake airdrops and giveaway scams. He said users should treat such posts with caution, adding that “any such posts you see are likely scams.”

Ripple has also warned users about fake support accounts and impersonation. Earlier reports said a fake Instagram account posed as Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse and pushed an XRP giveaway scheme. Such scams often copy real images and company names.

XRP users urged to avoid unknown links

The latest warning places wallet safety back at the center of the XRP community’s security debate. Fraud attempts often rely on user action, not a failure in the XRP Ledger itself.

Users should avoid unknown links, fake support messages, and websites asking them to connect wallets for free tokens. They should also avoid downloading any Xaman desktop app because Wind said no such product exists.

The message is direct for XRP holders: verify the source before signing any transaction. A fake airdrop, wallet download, or support message can become a wallet-draining attempt once a user approves it.

Binance Australia will require users to provide extra information when sending or receiving crypto from July 1, 2026. 

The exchange said the change applies only to Australian users and supports compliance with local rules.

Binance said users will need to provide sender information when receiving crypto deposits into their accounts. The rule applies to any amount of crypto sent to Binance Australia.

The exchange will also require beneficiary information when users withdraw crypto from Binance. Binance described the new process as a “mandatory requirement” for Australian users.

Deposits and withdrawals face new checks

For withdrawals, users must provide the beneficiary’s full name, country of residence, and city, town, or locality. If users send assets to themselves on another exchange, Binance said they only need to provide the name of the receiving exchange.

For deposits, users must go to the crypto deposit page and click the pending transaction. Binance said the pop-up will ask for the sender’s full name, country of residence, unique identifier, and city, town, or locality.

Missing details may delay transactions

Binance warned that transfers may be delayed or not processed if users do not provide the required details. In some deposit cases, the exchange said it may return the crypto assets to the sender or originating exchange.

The platform also said users will need to log in again from July 1, 2026, when the changes begin. Users who do not make crypto transfers do not need to take any action.

Australia moves toward stricter crypto oversight

The update comes as Australia expands anti-money laundering rules for virtual asset services. AUSTRAC said separate Travel Rule obligations apply to transfers of value involving virtual assets.

AUSTRAC’s transitional guidance says some virtual asset obligations are deferred until July 1, 2026. It also tells firms to prepare for customer checks, reporting, transfer of value, and record-keeping duties that start from that date.

Related crypto.news coverage reported that Australia’s 2026 rules include mandatory Travel Rule compliance from July 1, 2026. Separate coverage also said Australia has been moving toward bank-style rules for crypto exchanges and custody providers.

The Binance update shows how those rules may affect daily users. Crypto deposits and withdrawals will still work, but users must be ready to provide names and location details before transfers clear.

Hyperliquid’s native token HYPE has extended its record rally as new analysis points to the protocol’s built-in buyback system as a main driver behind the move, rather than ETF demand alone.

Forbes contributor Zennon Kapron argued that HYPE’s latest run is tied closely to Hyperliquid’s Assistance Fund, a protocol mechanism that uses trading fee revenue to buy HYPE in the open market. His report said Hyperliquid has used more than $1.16 billion in fee revenue for token purchases since launch.

The model differs from a normal company buyback. Hyperliquid does not run the process through a board vote or quarterly approval. The protocol routes revenue into the Assistance Fund, which then buys HYPE as part of its token model.

DefiLlama data supports that structure. Its Hyperliquid page states that 99% of fees from Hyperliquid Perps and the spot order book go to the Assistance Fund for buying HYPE, excluding some builder and unit protocol fees.

That creates a steady demand channel as long as trading remains active. When the exchange produces more fees, the buyback pool grows. When trading slows, the same support can shrink.

HYPE hits new highs 

Crypto.news price data showed HYPE trading near $63.16, up 13.72% in 24 hours, with a 24-hour high of $64.21. The same page listed HYPE’s all-time high at $64.23 on May 24, 2026.

The rally also pushed HYPE’s market cap above $15 billion, while its fully diluted valuation moved above $60 billion, according to the same crypto.news market page. The token also gained 47.28% over seven days and 53.79% over 30 days.

Earlier crypto.news coverage said HYPE broke above $60 on May 21 after a 16.15% daily gain. That report linked the move to ETF demand, DeFi-native speculation, thin float, and concentrated demand from traders and institutional products.

Another crypto.news report said HYPE had climbed nearly 49% in seven days as newly launched U.S. spot ETFs attracted more than $54 million in cumulative inflows. It also cited automated token buybacks as one factor behind the market move.

ETF demand adds a smaller second channel

Crypto.news reported that Bitwise launched its BHYP Hyperliquid ETF on the NYSE on May 15 with a 0.34% sponsor fee. The report said Bitwise would use 10% of that management fee to buy and hold HYPE on its balance sheet.

Bitwise said the move mirrors Hyperliquid’s own token model. In the same report, Bitwise CIO Matt Hougan said, “Hyperliquid’s token is explicitly designed so that rising trading activity on the Hyperliquid platform directly benefits token holders.”

The ETF channel still appears smaller than the protocol’s fee-funded buying. Crypto.news reported that Bitwise’s BHYP and 21Shares’ THYP had gathered more than $5.6 million in total net inflows after launch. That amount sits far below the hundreds of millions of dollars that the Assistance Fund has reportedly bought in some quarters.

Kapron’s argument centers on that scale gap. ETF inflows can bring visibility and institutional access, but the buyback engine has operated as a larger and more direct source of HYPE demand.

Volume remains the key risk for HYPE

The buyback model depends on trading activity. Hyperliquid earns fees when users trade perpetuals and spot markets. Those fees then help fund HYPE purchases through the Assistance Fund, according to DefiLlama’s revenue description.

That structure can support the token during active markets. It can also weaken during slow periods. If trading volume drops, fee revenue falls, and the Assistance Fund has less capital available for buybacks.

Forbes cited that risk in its analysis, noting that the model works best when trading volume stays high. The report said a market downturn could reduce fee revenue and weaken the buyback support behind HYPE.

That makes the HYPE rally a test of Hyperliquid’s trading engine. The token has benefited from buybacks, ETF headlines, and rising market interest. Its next test may depend on whether Hyperliquid can keep volume high enough to feed the same demand cycle.

Cardano founder Charles Hoskinson has started a broad review of more than 11,000 decentralized autonomous organizations as debate grows over how the network should fund research, product work, and future governance changes. 

The review comes during a tense period for Cardano’s treasury system and its 2027 constitution process.

Hoskinson said he has begun a governance review covering more than 11,000 DAOs and a decade of research inside and outside crypto. He said the work will study executive function, roadmap control, and strategy setting across different governance models.

He added that the goal is to suggest new features for Cardano governance through the constitution and new technology. He also said he may become a delegate representative and host a mini-convention before the 2027 process.

Cardano funding vote creates pressure

The review comes as Cardano faces a dispute over a 32.9 million ADA proposal to fund Input Output Global’s research lab for another year. Related coverage reported that 81% of active stake opposed the proposal as of May 22.

Some delegate representatives want clearer milestones and open requests for proposals instead of direct renewal for IOG. The vote runs through June 8, placing Cardano’s research budget at the center of its on-chain governance system.

Research model meets product demands

Hoskinson has argued that Cardano’s identity depends on its science-based approach. Earlier reports said he warned the network could lose researchers if the funding proposal fails, with the lab also facing closure risk.

He also said, “Cardano is the science coin,” while defending research funding. The debate has drawn calls for more direct support for products that may bring users and liquidity, including DeFi tools, bridges, rollups, privacy features, and other applications.

Cardano revenue adds to constitution debate

DefiLlama data showed Cardano with about $517 in 24-hour chain revenue, $2,583 in chain fees, and $1.83 million in DEX volume. The same tracker listed ADA’s market cap near $9.08 billion.

Those figures have made governance spending a more public issue for the network. Supporters of tighter budgets want clearer results from treasury funds, while research supporters say deep technical work remains part of Cardano’s base.

Hoskinson’s DAO review now gives the community a new path for debate. His plan centers on governance design rather than one funding vote, and it may feed into the next constitution process.

The review could shape how Cardano handles roadmaps, executive functions, budget control, and conflict between developers and voters. For now, the June 8 vote remains the near-term test for the network’s treasury process.

Key Takeaways

• FTSE Russell is removing Alphabet and AMD from the Russell 1000 Value Index, reclassifying them as exclusively growth-oriented companies.
• In a contrasting move, Apple and Microsoft are being added to the value index, transitioning from pure growth to a hybrid growth-value classification.
• The preliminary changes will be finalized on June 18, with implementation scheduled for June 29 after market close.
• Approximately $12.2 trillion in investment capital is tied to Russell U.S. Indexes, making this rebalancing significant for market flows.
• The Russell 3000’s aggregate market capitalization surged 29% to reach $75.6 trillion, with Nvidia claiming the top spot among U.S. companies by market value.

FTSE Russell unveiled its preliminary index reconstitution list on May 22, initiating the semi-annual rebalancing cycle for its U.S. equity benchmarks set to conclude in June 2026.

The most notable developments from this preliminary announcement involve several household-name technology companies. Alphabet and Advanced Micro Devices will be dropped from the Russell 1000 Value Index. This change effectively designates both corporations as exclusively growth-oriented investments.

Alphabet Inc., GOOGL

Apple and Microsoft are experiencing the reverse trajectory. These tech titans will be incorporated into the value index, transitioning from a pure growth designation to a hybrid category that encompasses both growth and value characteristics.

Micron Technology and Sandisk are also shifting categories, exiting the value index while being incorporated into the Russell 1000 Growth Index. The persistent rally in semiconductor equities has been the driving force behind this reclassification.

Market observers had broadly anticipated that Amazon would be redesignated as purely value-oriented, considering its decelerating revenue expansion in recent periods. In March, Jefferies’ equity research division projected Amazon would receive a “100% Value” classification. However, FTSE Russell’s preliminary announcement made no reference to Amazon in its growth and value index modifications.

The provisional list undergoes final review on June 18. The official index reconstitution becomes effective following the U.S. market close on June 29.

Investment Implications of the Rebalancing

While these reclassifications might appear to be mere administrative adjustments, they carry substantial financial consequences. Roughly $12.2 trillion in investment capital is either benchmarked against or directly invested in vehicles that mirror the Russell U.S. Indexes. Every classification adjustment triggers portfolio rebalancing across countless exchange-traded funds and mutual funds.

Historical trading patterns show exceptionally elevated volume during Russell rebalancing events. During June 2025, the closing auction session alone generated $217.2 billion in transaction volume.

Market Concentration Trends in the U.S.

The 2026 reconstitution also underscores the remarkable expansion of the overall equity market. The aggregate market capitalization of the Russell 3000 climbed from $58.4 trillion to $75.6 trillion based on the April 30 ranking date, representing a substantial 29% year-over-year appreciation.

Nvidia has ascended to become the most valuable U.S. corporation by market capitalization, following an extraordinary 82.5% valuation increase over the trailing twelve months. Alphabet delivered the most impressive annual performance among the top ten companies, advancing from fifth position to second place. Apple and Microsoft dropped to third and fourth positions respectively.

Nine companies maintained their standing within the top ten by market value. Walmart emerged as the sole new addition to this elite group, displacing Eli Lilly from the rankings.

Every company within the top ten now commands a market capitalization exceeding $1 trillion. Five have surpassed the $2 trillion threshold, while four have climbed above $3 trillion. This contrasts sharply with 2025, when only seven companies had achieved the $1 trillion milestone.

The collective market capitalization of the seven dominant U.S. technology companies — Apple, Microsoft, Nvidia, Amazon, Alphabet, Meta, and Tesla — expanded from $15 trillion in 2025 to $22.4 trillion, representing a remarkable 49% increase.

The dividing line between Russell 1000 large-cap constituents and Russell 2000 small-cap members also climbed 24%, now standing at $5.7 billion. Among small-cap stocks, the smallest component of the Russell 2000 possessed a market capitalization of $146.4 million, marking nearly a 23% increase from 2025 levels.

Companies promoted from small-cap to large-cap status were predominantly found in the technology and industrial sectors.

A blockchain researcher has pushed back against growing criticism of the Ethereum Foundation, arguing that the organization is doing “exactly” what it was designed to do, which the critics keep getting wrong.

In a post on X titled “Leave the Foundation Alone,” William Mougayar, a Toronto-based blockchain investor, researcher and best-selling author, argued that the EF is a protocol steward, not a marketing engine.

Mougayar said that ETH, Ethereum and the Ethereum Foundation are three separate entities with three separate trajectories. “The asset is money. The infrastructure is shared compute. The Foundation is a non-profit that is steering the protocol toward irrelevance for its own founders,” he wrote, adding that confusing the three leads to bad predictions and misplaced anger.

Source: William Mougayar

The post comes as the foundation has faced a wave of criticism from the crypto community in recent months. ETH sales, unstaking moves and public silence have drawn repeated accusations that the organization is harming ETH’s price performance.

Related: Ethereum is still a good long-term buy, according data: Analyst

EF is hardening the protocol

Mougayar said the EF is on a “subtraction path,” working to become less central to Ethereum over time. “ It is hardening the protocol so the world does not need it so much. It is shipping upgrades. It is funding the research that nobody else funds,” he wrote.

He suggested that the criticism comes from people who want a king. He claimed that expecting the EF to market ETH or court institutions is “like expecting the IETF to run Super Bowl ads for TCP/IP.”

ETH is currently trading at $2,117.09, up by 4.67% over the past day. However, the token is down more than 57% compared to its all-time high of $4,953 recorded in August last year, according to data from CoinMarketCap.

Related: Harvard dumps entire ETH position after just one quarter

EF sells, unstakes ETH

Earlier this month, the foundation completed its third OTC sale of ETH to BitMine Immersion Technologies, offloading 10,000 ETH at an average price of $2,292, worth roughly $22.9 million. Combined with two earlier transactions, 5,000 ETH in March and another 10,000 ETH the previous week, the Foundation has sold approximately $47 million worth of ETH to BitMine in recent weeks.

The sale also came shortly after the foundation unstaked 17,035 ETH worth around $40 million. The EF also unstaked another 21,270 Ether from Lido, worth nearly $50 million, earlier this month.

Market Moves: Why is Ethereum Foundation selling? BTC futures warning signs

Key Takeaways

• A rate increase at the ECB’s June 10–11 policy meeting appears virtually guaranteed, with insiders calling it a done deal.
• Eurozone inflation currently stands at 3%, exceeding the central bank’s 2% objective by a full point.
• Tensions with Iran have disrupted critical shipping lanes through the Strait of Hormuz, escalating energy costs and intensifying inflationary pressures.
• Central bank officials are unlikely to signal a follow-up move in July, citing concerns about sluggish economic expansion.
• Analysts at Deutsche Bank predict two quarter-percentage-point increases in June and September, lifting the benchmark rate to 2.50%.

The European Central Bank appears ready to implement a rate increase when policymakers convene in June, as ongoing tensions involving Iran continue to elevate energy costs and drive up consumer prices throughout the currency bloc.

Martin Kocher, a member of the ECB’s Governing Council, indicated this week that officials are weighing the decision between maintaining current rates and implementing an increase. He noted that price growth this year is expected to exceed earlier projections.

Kocher delivered these remarks while attending a gathering of European finance ministers in Cyprus. He emphasized that significant uncertainty persists and refrained from providing any forward guidance extending past the June decision.

Price Pressures Exceed Central Bank Goal

Price growth across the eurozone had previously returned to the ECB’s 2% objective before the outbreak of the Iran crisis earlier in the year. Since then, it has climbed to 3%, primarily propelled by elevated energy expenses linked to disruptions affecting the Strait of Hormuz, a critical waterway for international energy shipments.

Four individuals with knowledge of the ECB Governing Council’s deliberations informed Reuters that the rate adjustment scheduled for June 11 is essentially confirmed. The central bank had previously indicated a probable action in June, and reversing course at this stage would undermine its authority, according to these sources.

Joachim Nagel, another ECB Governing Council member, stated that the likelihood of more widespread inflationary momentum is increasing. Kocher emphasized this point further, declaring that a rate adjustment would be unavoidable should the Strait of Hormuz remain blocked.

US President Donald Trump announced on Saturday that a peace agreement with Iran has been substantially negotiated, though no official particulars have been released. Sources indicated that even if a peace settlement materializes before the June gathering, it would not eliminate the rationale for tightening policy, as energy prices would require considerable time to decline.

Future Policy Path Remains Ambiguous

While the June decision appears settled, the trajectory beyond that remains highly uncertain. Sources indicate that ECB officials intend to steer clear of any statement that would lock them into a July rate adjustment.

Weak economic performance is the primary factor behind this cautious approach. Two sources pointed out that the central bank’s own economic projections may prove overly optimistic and could require downward adjustments. Diminished consumer spending and a softening employment market may independently contribute to lowering inflation, potentially diminishing the necessity for additional tightening moves.

Financial markets are currently anticipating three ECB rate increases over the coming twelve months. The central bank’s communication on June 11 is anticipated to temper those expectations.

Analysts at Deutsche Bank are projecting quarter-point increases in both June and September, which would elevate the policy rate to 2.50%. They characterize this level as representing the upper boundary of the neutral rate corridor.

Revised ECB projections for economic growth and price developments are scheduled for release at the June 10–11 meeting and are anticipated to influence the ultimate policy determination.