Why Global Crypto Regulation Is Keeping Institutions on the Sidelines

The EU, US, and UK have each unveiled comprehensive crypto frameworks , but staggered timelines and structural incompatibilities mean institutions are building infrastructure, not deploying capital.

2025 was supposed to be the year institutional adoption arrived. The headlines suggested as much: JPMorgan exploring crypto trading, major banks announcing stablecoin initiatives, regulators across three continents finalizing frameworks.

But look past the press releases. The world’s three largest financial markets have taken fundamentally different approaches, operating on misaligned timelines that leave global institutions in regulatory limbo.

MiCA: First Mover, Patchy Rollout

The EU’s Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation became the world’s first comprehensive crypto framework in January 2025. On paper, it’s the gold standard. In practice, implementation has been messier.

By December: 102 licensed crypto-asset service providers (CASPs) across the EU, with 12 being traditional credit institutions. But the stablecoin issuer market remains underdeveloped , just 30 active issuers.

The Netherlands and Malta issued licenses on day one. Germany followed in mid-January. Other member states are dragging transition periods to July 2026. Divergent national interpretations persist, and confusion remains about how MiCA interacts with existing payments rules.

The promise of “authorize once, operate everywhere” hasn’t fully materialized.

US: Stablecoins Solved, Market Structure Stalled

The United States delivered a split decision. On July 18, President Trump signed the GENIUS Act — the first federal crypto legislation in US history. The stablecoin framework requires 1:1 reserve backing with dollars or short-term Treasuries, monthly disclosures, and crucially clarifies that payment stablecoins aren’t securities or commodities.

SEC Chair Paul Atkins called it transformative. The OCC began implementation immediately.

But two catches loom. First, GENIUS doesn’t take effect until January 18, 2027. Second, the broader CLARITY Act — which would finally settle the SEC vs. CFTC jurisdiction battle for non-stablecoin crypto has stalled in the Senate.

The Senate Banking Committee produced an alternative framework (RFIA) that lets the SEC retain more discretion. Until reconciled, institutions still don’t know which regulator they’ll answer to for anything that isn’t a stablecoin.

“Pushing market structure legislation into next year reflects the depth of bipartisan engagement , not a loss of momentum,” the Blockchain Association told CoinDesk. For compliance teams, that’s cold comfort.

UK: Comprehensive Framework, 2027 Timeline

The UK is furthest behind but most methodical. In December, HM Treasury published final draft legislation bringing stablecoins, trading platforms, custody, staking, and intermediaries under the existing FSMA framework.

The go-live date: October 25, 2027.

Unlike the EU’s bespoke MiCA approach, the UK is extending existing regulatory architecture to crypto  same framework, new asset class. The FCA has launched three consultations covering conduct rules, market abuse, and prudential requirements.

Key divergence from the US: UK stablecoin issuers cannot pass interest from backing assets to holders. The Bank of England is also developing a separate regime for systemic sterling stablecoins, with proposed holding limits of £20,000 for individuals.

The FCA has launched a regulatory sandbox for stablecoin issuers — an implicit acknowledgment the framework needs real-world testing.

The Incompatibility Problem

For global institutions, these misalignments create deployment paralysis.

Timeline problem: MiCA is live but fragmented. GENIUS activates in 2027. The UK regime follows in late 2027. A coordinated global rollout means waiting for the slowest jurisdiction.

Structural conflict: MiCA prohibits interest payments to stablecoin holders outright. GENIUS prohibits issuer-paid interest but leaves a loophole for intermediaries like exchanges a gap US banks have criticized. The UK leans toward the EU’s stricter approach.

Multi-issuance ,where entities in different jurisdictions issue identical stablecoins under different regulatory regimes , remains unresolved. MiCA doesn’t expressly regulate it; the European Commission is expected to issue clarifying guidance.

TRM Labs found 80% of reviewed jurisdictions saw institutions announce digital asset initiatives in 2025. The operative word: announce.

What This Means

The institutional adoption headlines will keep coming. Banks will announce pilots. Asset managers will file applications. Treasury departments will explore tokenization.

But meaningful capital deployment , the kind that shows up in earnings reports rather than press releasesn remains constrained until regulatory harmonization catches up with regulatory announcement.

The optimistic read: 2025 built frameworks, 2026 builds infrastructure, 2027 deploys capital when all three regimes are operational.

The realistic read: regulatory harmonization across the EU, US, and UK has historically taken years. Wall Street built the rails in 2025. The trains won’t run until the tracks actually connect.

This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice.